I disagree on the point by Pravin that China started the war with India in 1962. From what I know, the Indian Prime Minister at that time PM Nehru deducted that China was very weak and India should take the opportunity to attack China and take more territories. However, his plan backfired and India lost badly. At that time, China could have kept he disputed territory but was too generous returning the disputed territory and Indian prisoners of war to India.
I don't know what kind of history they teach you in PRC, but that's absolutely incorrect! And we have immense data & historical evdience to support that!
No history education is required on either side. A few simple questions can clarify the logic: What benefits did the 1962 war bring to China? Nothing, no land, no honor; What harm has it brought to China? At that time, the relationship between China and the United States and the Soviet Union was not good, and India was just the opposite. Therefore, fighting against India was a huge diplomatic risk. It is neither beneficial nor full of risks. Why does China want to attack India and India still loses? The only answer is that India attacked China.
@@jishe8957 Ah! The mindless conspiracy theorist school of history & analysis! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 By that same logic, exactly the same things can be said for Indian side. IN fact, India lost territory! So, by your (asinine) logic, China must have started the war...! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Fortunately, we don't have to resort to hypothetical & puerile what-ifs & concocted scenarios. We have reams of data/evidence!
@@shantanusapru In the 1962 war, although India was severely beaten, it did not lose any land or pay compensation. It lost nothing but humiliation, right?
@@jishe8957 I really can't argue with people who don't know basic facts... For starters, just read the Encyclopaedia Britannica's entry on the 1962 Indo-China war. Just quoting a relevant portion (as YT doesn't allow to post URLs): "At the conclusion of the conflict, China retained control of about 14,700 square miles (38,000 square km) of territory in Aksai Chin."
Oh my goodness. India should simply be broken up into separate Nations eg. Khalistan (Sikhs), Kashmir Muslims, & other nations with the following ethnic groups: Hindi 43.6% Bengali 8% Marathi 6.9% Telugu 6.8% Tamil 6.7% Gujarati 4.6% Urdu 4.2% Kannada 3.6% The Hindus are a miniority & cursed with their Caste System.
Hi Julian Craze.. Nehru has done a few good things for India, one among those is DEEP STATE, which actually controls center, Military and Govt. State Govt are kind of independent but no one can think of separation.. no matter what Govt comes at center, India's policy at a broad level will not change. Over past Indian have learned one thing... UNITED WE STAND DIVIDED WE FALL. So you dream will never come true
Why would China make trouble with India if India behaves in a friendly manner? India should reflect on history when talking about the disputed territory in the Himalayas. Instead, India has taken an opportunistic attitude on this issue, n appears to have a chip on its shoulder with regard to China! JKH
India wants trouble with both pakistan and Chinese. 😉😉😉😉😉 Because pakistan and China both are not democracy. Thank you pakistan for being islamic state of pakistan and China being people autocracy of Chinese.😉😉😉
@@anuradharaghavan872China didn't cross that river, Indian soldier did. you can see in the footage, carve on the mountain side are Chinese flag. and the Indian can be seen crossing the river. also the India soldier didn't get killed by weapons. more of them died to exposure because of the freezing water. the confrontation was actually very small, the death was due mostly to weather and how the Indian were not ready to deal with their wounded quickly in a very hostile environment.
Because of repel of article 370 threatened China and the speech of Amit in parliament that we will take Aksai chin from China that why China had the right and it did enter Galwan, but why u say they entered according to bhakts no one entered
Should ask themselves why all your neighbors are moving away from you and getting closer relationship with China? Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Maldives and now Bhutan. If you hasn't done anything wrong to all these neighbors, then what is the reason for them to moving away from you and getting closer with someone you see as your enemy?
Like it or not, China will always be India's neighbour. It's better for neighbours to get along than not. In my view, their border disputes, which stem from the British Empire's overreach, could and should be settled with reasonableness and realistic accommodation from both sides, and not be allowed to be used by opportunistic politicians, ambitious military establishments, and 3rd party countries as an excuse to incite nationalistic fervors for their own interests. After all these decades, it should be clear neither side could impose its will entirely on the other over a sparsely populated but expansive and difficult terrain. China has demonstrated that it can settle border disputes reasonably with their neighbours, as in the case of Russia, Kazakhstan, Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan, etc. Only in cases where 3rd party interests, namely the U.S.A., intervenes and supports the other side, or the other side takes unilateral actions that violate its interests or previously agreed conditions, would China use its military to protect its sovereignty. Even today, India maintains 4 times the troop strength than China does at their border. Pretty good indication of the difference in their attitudes and intentions. I look forward to seeing a demilitarized border with joint patrols for law enforcement purposes only.
Awww.. right British Empire's overreach as compared to some Chinese dynasty's land grab, right?! At least the Republic of India rightfully inherited the realm from the British Empire. The same can't be said about Mao's PRC though.
@@jarjarbinks3193 How did the British Empire acquire its lands in the East? It hasn’t even wiped the shit off its own butt, so how do you Indians “inherit” it with such joy?
I hope this happens sooner than later so that we sikhs, kashmiris, nagas repeat the mukiti vahini path, leading to our Independence from colonial union of india. We will miss no chance to make alliance with Chinese Pak forces and create our version of mukiti vahini during the war
"A mouse got very happy that Cat agreed to cooperate with mouse and began moving forward with flaunting its tail........But what awaited it in the end was a Lion." U think this is a small Country like Taiwan or Philippine's that China can easily wage war and walk away🤣🤣.....u must be dreaming👌.
India is not even in the minds of Chinese policy makers. If any Indian honestly look at his own country and had been to China, India is way behind China in all fields. Best concentrate to alleviate its poverty and caste system than to keep making China the focus. The border dispute is just Modi's way to distract Indians from introspection.
I have to say I find it very bizarre that China would want a war with India in the next few years. Yes capacity wise China can, with many countries, such as Phillipines. But territory is not the strategic goal, neither is the BRI. And BTW I don't think India can hinder BRI. If you happen to read Sun Tzu, you might find him saying to battle using real soldiers and shedding blood is the worst strategy. The best is the conquest of hearts. Actively attacking India would be beyond stupid political wise.
A war with India? 😂 Whether people like it or not, USA, China, Russia, India are top 4 ranked in military... These 4 countries going to war means a recession that world won't be able to control... This is not Soviet era where one country can fall and rest can move on.. 😅 This video is soo dumb... The best example is Ukraine and Russia... Let's say Russia is equal to China in military even though Russia is far experienced just like India and USA with border conflicts and terrorism(even though China has capabilities, remember, China main power is it's navy not army or airforce) ... Let's just assume China is equal to Russia, then... Is he saying Ukraine is equal to India? 😅 I mean, It doesn't matter how powerful China is... Before India China war ends, entire world economy will be destroyed.. A war without escalation? Both China and India doesn't have capability to contain the war in just one region... It'll spread like forest fire... Soo all this assumption about China and India war needs to go... Because we won't have any war even in distant future.. Border conflict is geopolitical move where both loose few soldiers to prove point but people thinking it'll escalate to war needs to grow up... China is increasing troops in border 😂biggest joke.. If China is soo powerful, why haven't they taken Taiwan yet? Imagine not being able to take Taiwan but acting like you can take Indian land 😅 Even if China becomes as well as capable as USA, they won't be stupid to start a war with India because USA will take advantage and destroy China.. The only one who'll take advantage of China-India war is Pakistan but India can hold Pakistan at bay... So India and China won't win if they start a war... USA will be the most beneficial...
@@THUGPUTINif you understand that a war between China and India will benefit the US then you should know that the US will on,y supply weapons to India, they will never supply troops or join you in your wars, that way they can make money from you and later they can take both China and India with Russia not having the economy to fight the US, this leaves the US full world domination, the end game… The reason why the US is so against China is because they are changing the rules, they want a multipolar world and this threatens the US’s hegemony. China has never claimed to want hegemony, this is the rhetoric of the west and India…
@@THUGPUTIN 4th? India can't even manufacture bullets, 4th in what? India lacks war resources and capital, what does it rely on? Malnourished poor soldiers?🙄🙄
@@THUGPUTINA quick fight and quick retreat is possible, as in 1962, with the aim of reducing India's national strength and balancing the power in the Indian Ocean, so that the Indian Ocean can form the pattern of Southeast Asia today.
I am not sure that China did start the 1962 war. Why would they withdraw afterwards? I certainly hope they don't decide on a war in 2024 either, although China does consider Arunshal Pradesh part of Xizang, which it historically was.
I'm Chinese. Believe me, China has always pursued a policy of peace and friendship. As long as India does not make the mistakes of 1962, China and India can have good neighborly friendship. Moreover, India should show the courage to correct historical mistakes.
@@aryaman05 Your comment is full of provocation and meaningless. In our Chinese eyes, India has never experienced a real war. The Indian army also lacks combat effectiveness.
@@bhabhubb6481 Xizang is an inalienable part of China's territory. Since the Yuan Dynasty, the central government has always exercised effective jurisdiction over Xizang. The Tibetan people are an important member of the Chinese national family. Xizang was called "Tubo" in the Tang and Song Dynasties, "Uszang" in the Yuan and Ming Dynasties, and "Tanggute" and "Tubot" in the Qing Dynasty. It has been called "Xizang" since the reign of Kangxi in the Qing Dynasty. On May 23, 1951, Xizang was peacefully liberated. After the Xizang rebellion was pacified in 1959, the central government began to exercise full and direct jurisdiction over Xizang. On September 9, 1965, the Xizang Autonomous Region was officially established. On December 23, 2019, absolute poverty was basically eliminated in Xizang, and the whole region was lifted out of poverty.
The McMahon Line was first drafted in 1913, and the treaty to ratify them (Simla Accords) was never signed by the Republic Of China(ROC) who had just overthrown the Qing dynasty. There was no such thing as the McMahon Line in 1890, and China isn't disputing where the Line was drawn, she's disputing the validity of the Line in its entirety. The primary Indian claim is that the ROC did sign the Simla Accords because a British official called Olaf Caroe fabricated a narrative in 1938 where the ROC signed the Simla Accords (they didn't) and ceded parts of Tibet to the Raj. In 1963 a British diplomat compared a pre-1938 treaties compendium with the post-Caroe compendium and found that Caroe had changed the note on the ROC's not signing the Simla Accords into one where the ROC signed it and considers the Indo-Tibetan border finalised. Nehru picked up a copy of Caroe's fabricated compendium so he got the impression that his country was legally entitled to more than she actually was. Compounding this was the US' decision to add fuel to the flames by declaring the McMahon Line as the legitimate boundary in an attempt to contain the spread of communism, despite reservations from the US State Department and protests from the fiercely non-communist Chiang Kai-Shek, leader of the ROC. However, we all know Nehru irreversibly altered his country's relations with China in 1962, so by 1963, when the fabrication was discovered, it was already too late to stem the tide of Indian nationalism based on the false compendium entry. And that leaves us with the situation today, in the aftermath of a British attempt to de jure carve out a piece of Chinese territory which failed but had some success de facto, then a British fabrication of her failed attempt to carve out Chinese territory, then an Indian acceptance of the British fabrication alongside American endorsement, and a Chinese refusal to accept the fabrication as anything remotely legal. Some Indians recognise that they don't actually have a legal claim to South Tibet, so they've begun using a different claim in that the people living in South Tibet want to be part of India more than China; in essence, a claim based on the principle of self-determination. This is India's secondary claim. However, as history has shown time and time again (Catalonia, Confederate States, Taiwan, Corsica, Chechnya, Tibet, Naxalites), without the permission of the larger body, a smaller section of the population will not be allowed to separate from its original country regardless of what they want. A much more detailed account of the McMahon Line and its history is available here, written by Peter Lee who, contrary to impressions given by his surname, is not at all Chinese.
A decade since Modi came to power his supporters claim that Modi is all talk no action. They claim Modi is happy to be at par with Ethiopia and Somalia, his only policy is domestic politics
Indians harbour the dream/fantasy of being considered as the world's foremost No.1 superpower BUT there's a problem, a BIG problem that is.. India is not a permanent member of the UNSC with veto powers. The hallmark of genuine superpower status Q: What can Indians do in order to be accepted as a permanent member of the UNSC with veto powers? Note: This is my favourite, simply because not a single Indian can answer this one 😂 just plenty of blank talks about their birthday wishes but no answers
Chinese are UNSC permanent member but all they can do is go for cease fire on request of pakistan. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 P5 have the power but they are controlled by super powers like india, Israel, Japan Germany etc. 😆😆😆😆😆😆
They will have to please all P5 at the same time, or try to do the same as what Gaddafi did in the UNSC. Indian love to say “we will see”, and nothing can be seen for decades.
China officially announced it lost 4 soldiers in the Galwan Incident while India official figure stood at 20* Indians: China lost 40 according to the CIA, China lost 44 according to Russia, China lost 50 according to Lord Krishna 😁 *Actually it is doubtful China suffered any casualties at all. Its officially announced 4 deaths was meant to calm things down with India 😂
Countries that lead the world in 44 critical technology* sectors: 1. China = 37 2. USA = 7 3. UK = 0 4. Germany = 0 5. Japan = 0 *In fields like defence, space, robotics, energy, the environment, biotechnology, artificial intelligence (AI), advanced materials and key quantum technology areas Source: Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) **India leads the world in the field of cow husbandry, which is neither a technology nor critical
Your podcast is very informative. Based on the facts in Hamas Israeli conflict will definitely have impact on Indian elections which was not the content of the podcast. Modi made blunder after blunder and put nation on the spot.
Nope... It's already clear that Muslim will again vote for congress and fail big time... Karnataka is already suffering from this... Bjp was smart to give away karnataka and showcase of congress governance.... They couldn't make Delhi as example of freebies politics because Delhi is too left and congress and bjp won't win Delhi anytime soon... So its AAP and same goes to punjab... I don't see AAP losing punjab to congress... Maybe a coalition with bjp might come to power.. Isreal - Palestinian conflict will help BJP... How? Well kerala support to Palestinian and Hamas leader directly talking will help bjp big time... I. N. D. I. A had great start and perhaps had the opportunity to put bjp under them but unity is what they lack.. The biggest problem is rahul Ghandi himself... Rahul cannot win without outside support, ie..... Global leftist support... Sashi tharoor and Sachin pilot are two most powerful leaders congress have and they don't even promote them.. 😅
China and India are ancient civilizations. Its best they cooperate than go to war. These two BRICS members must develop trust and not fall in to believing war will solve their border issues. These two great nations together will create global synergy.
India is neither a nation, nor civilisation or great. India is home to 3 ditinct civilisations and dozens of nations. 3 civilisations Indo aryan, Dravidian and sino tibetic (north east nations). Nations are Punjabi, kashmiri, Gujarati, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Kannada etc
China's annual surplus from India is approximately US$100 billion, making it the second largest surplus country after the United States. I don't see the significance of a Sino-Indian war when China is focusing on economic construction and constantly improving people's living standards. Factories and technology are more valuable than land.
Fun fact: China shares land borders with 14 of its neighbours. Over the years, it has settled border disputes with 12 of them, with Bhutan and India left. Hopefully, border disputes with Bhutan would be settled soon. It can be considered a success by China even if India is left with unsettled disputes. Because everyone knows you can't settle anything with Indians. That's why all its neighbours prefer Beijing over New Delhi
As always, excellent analysis. Let's remember that if the Americans are biding time to prepare for war with China, so are the Chinese. After Ukraine war, Russo China military development cooperation is expected is reach its acme. In my opinion, these intervening few years will help China more than the Americans.
I agree. According to the Pentagon, the Chinese building capacity is more than 200 times bigger than America capacity. They can churn out subs, jets, ships, missiles very fast and with increasing quality.
China don't invent US does. Just by copying shape, once cannot build 5th gen fighter. US is near 6th gen. Israel has helped China in developing their defense tech. After Hamas incident, Israel now will not believe China
@@INDIAN-sx9kc Jf 17 much better than poor Tejas how many Tejas been purchased by Indian how many been export ? 😂😂 The most funniest part is The most finest part is India producing nothing but Claim they have quality? on? nothing?🎉🎉
Just let you know, very few people in China know about 1962. Personally speaking, I don't think it is a war, Chinese only mobilized 30k troops which is nothing. In a real war against Vietnam in 1980, China mobilized half a million troops. So if Vietnam can make a good relationship with China, why can't India do? Indian government needs to move forward.
Superiority complex mean you do what you need to do at your own pace and capability. When you start comparing means you are worried and not confident.@@SA-xm4jk
I find the comments section entertaining, in fact better than watching a movie. Mr. Pravin spoke for 16 minutes and 1962 border war only came in at 13 minutes. No serious discussion (discussion in a sense, no replies for a given comment) about what he spoke in the first 13 minutes. Everyone is excited and jumped in for 1962 war: The usual suspects comments were: 1. battle harden solders, 2. 1967 we won 3. We gave them bloody nose 4. The list goes on, I have to use mnemonic technique to list them all. Alternate viewpoints is typically labelled CCP bots.
@@Ajay-vf6di You know what CPC mouthpiece look like? GO check CGTN, Global Times, People's Daily, Xinhua, etc. They don't talk about war with any other countries so openly. I am sorry, but this channel is not qualified to be CPC mouth piece.
@@turtlesoup8134 they maintain different kinds of mouthpieces. Some are sophisticated and some are cheap feet licking once. This channel is the second type. If at all china want war. Bring it on, no need to send this pimps to create a narrative. He says humbling india 😂😂😂😂 OMG China started believing it's own propaganda. This are side effects of being too much fake.
@@vijayarajan3276 here is my argument. If china want to start a war, india will go for it. Ur r worried about fire power, that can be borrowed like israil is doing right now. If ur nerves about getting close to West, that is the most important thing to do right now. Left has destroyed india with there bullshit ideology. India won't get better opportunity to open up to West. What about Russia? They can understand, coz even they don't want Chinese domination in the region. Finally the point is simple. If we have to choose between two scoundrels West and china. It is wise to go with a known scoundrel because we already know how he operates. This new clown, doesn't worth.
@@nirmalbhel3231 Those are just passing quarrels between two lovers who have been in love with each other for thousands of years. And there was a jealous and malicious outside third party sowing lies during those three quarrels. But like all lies, their effects don't last. Let the love-making continue.
@@simonchowkwchow5083 India and world have realized.. Never believe Chinese Communist Party. China and Chinese and Indians don't want war but the party will do it.
@@nirmalbhel3231 Then let the BJP fight the Communist Party of China then. Don't let them bother the people of both India and China who want to make love not war.
Must teach the fox a lesson. The fox , play around , jumping up and down, dancing, creating snoring noices near the lion’s ears. The fox , all along , never has any self esteem and lacks independent thinking, gaining no respect from other nearby animals, and this fox , moreover always hide behind the tiger’s back, shouting very loud to the sleeping lion . Now the tiger has decided not to ambush or suddenly bite the lion’s tail, so to say, the borned- with - no -self -respect fox is worried now just because it knows what it has been dancing around for. The fox find out that it after all lacks sinking jaws like that of the lion. Animal kingdoms will not respect this fox.
So to say, there is this , now, unveiled what exactly is this borned- no- self- respect fox ? Not to say struggling for 300 years without a fight, not even a claw fight or without a bite, how can the lion respect the fox? The fox just listen to the tunes of Dor Ray Me. Animal kingdom will not respect this type of foxy behavior.
Every Indian should learn from the wisdom of India's greatest sage of our time Jayant Bhandari, his TRUTH Will hopefully allow India to make peace with China.
LAC, line of actual control is the source of China Indian war. In my humble opinion, the British were playing with words. That’s the British’s mindsets. However both Indian and are very capable of making their own words too. Such as using LMC for line of mutual control? Make them the free trade zones, instead killing. There’s nothing to gain for both sides. Just change one word will bring tremendous gains for both side.
Cooperation in BRI. No skirmishes in the naval security. BIMSTEC cancellation. China won Myanmaar, Maldives, Srilanka, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. China increases influence in Afghanistan. Now India got Bhutan and Nepal. But politician are bragging about Pok, akhand bharat and gilgitbaltistan. South East Asia being bussiness hub than India. Buying Weapons from anywhere for diplomatic purpose, no use.
if there is war, it is to break the India US alliances. like Ukraine, US will not help, India would feel betray and pointless to work with US anymore and so the Quad would collapse on it own. thus to avoid this, India should reduce it ties with US military and seek Russian counterbalance.
With Modi's administrations policies on economy and defence, India has lost both its economic and military utility for USA. Add to that the misadventures of desi James Bond, India is now more of a problem than solution to anything in western eyes. Now the question is, how much India cooperates with China. Coming of Nawaz Sharif, reopening of cricket ties and ISI killing all anti India elements, is an indication that India might join BRI. If that happens, then we might see Americs leveraging Taliban and Sikhs to its advantage. Interesting times ahead.
@@HarjeetSingh-ev8vk His got none - just a blind Indian nationalist - way too many of them, is like in America. Our American govt. + the whole West fear the BRI because of a new system block is coming up in which will destroy the value of USD. We are in trouble if BRI succeed, is why our govt. via NED been funding oppositions both militarily and politically, this include India...The Fact, Taiwan DPP 'Japanese blood' govt. is funded by NED.... China just invested in Afghanistan + Pakistan on the mineral sector. Indian's offer was rejected by the Taliban...Pride with the mindset of caste system is going to destroy India...I was indoctrinated to hate CPC since birth like how Indians and Pakistanis...but I despise liars more...
The most stupid assesment I've come across till now. The fact of the matter remains that India's military capacity has more than doubled since 2008 be it in combat capabilities, modernisation or mobility. India is a neutral country and it has no will to either join the west or the Chinese. We have our own ambitions
I DISAGREE...please read the book of "The Art of War" by Sun Tzu if you really wanted to understand the Chinese philosophy. “The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War “The greatest victory is that which requires no battle.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War Tell me, why would China go to war with India when the Chinese are winning years or decades ahead in every sectors?
Read the book “India’s War with China” The author Neville Maxwell had access to documents that are still remain classified in India as they contain sensitive material
With trade deficit of 8:1, China will avoid any armed conflict with India, though they are more advanced, pro active and equipment. India too is dependent on Chinese imports. They already achieved their strategic objective in Ladakh what they wanted without firing a single shot.
they may not have 'fired a single shot' but they did bring in crude weapons and kill our soldiers and their soldiers got killed in return too. so, the galwan valley incident cannot be classified under 'without firing a single shot'.
Listen carefully Indians! China has $3.5 trillion dollars worth of forex reserves. Plus China has $2 trillion dollars worth of loans to BRI countries. On top of that, China has $3 trillion dollars worth of assets globally like mineral rights, ports, start-ups, stocks, sovereign wealth funds etc. Add to that, China recorded $880 billion dollars worth of trade surplus last year alone. While India only got $500 plus billion forex reserves and India wants to counter China? This is not even a David vs. Goliath kinda thing, this is an ant taking on a T-rex 😂
China thinks strategically. Peace with India would be a preferred scenario for them. They don’t need a war to boost their image. They have no need for more land in the border region with India. However, they will certainly protect their border against Indian adventurism.
Last time you said the same when Both Xi & Biden meet India is in Risk But After that Pelosi landed In Taiwan You did not Make video Now India is not in Risk Again you came today Premature not even hours Biden said Dictator further is comming pl Make video When India is De risked only Making Videos India is at Risk for past years and nothing Happing is Boring at lest next 6 months what will happen please tell What abot 2+2 recently concluded in Delhi is it only Time pass For blinken & Austin
Kuch bhi bolta hai Pravin. No war probable between India-China. Regular skirmishes may continue. And pravin, your understanding of AI is clearly close to zer, bakwas band kar
I always hoped it would be the tortoise and the hare story with India - China. It still may be as Xi looks overly confident and overly proud and their population demographic failure has begun and economically they are on the descent. But i do worry that Indias rise has started 2 decades too late in order to confront China. Because China is on the decline and its Superpower status is slowly disappearing, it may well want confrontation with India to prove something to the world. Satyameva Jayate 🙏🕉️. I am very proud that the Vedic people of Bharat have never been a coveting, aggressive people. They have only ever been a in search of eternal knowledge.
@@mysmartkryptonite354 Prove this world is a oblait spheroid. Even with those countless pictures from space, you will find countless people contradicting your arguments. 🤣🤣🤣
Major issue in meeting is trading rules of oil trade in middle east and Iran sanctions. If you want to rule the world you need to control the oil. Real issue is petrodollar trades.
Excellent vlog thanks for your efforts and comprehensive analysis. Well I agreed wd Mr.prawen that environment is very exclusive for China 🇨🇳 to have expedition against his neighbouring rival and USA already had given green signal in shape of tiewan that USA believed one China policy.
To say China🇨🇳 is scared of India🇮🇳 is like saying India's scared of Pakistan🇵🇰 ! The reason is simple, China's GDP is 7 times that of India's as India's GDP is 8 times that of Pakistan. China is 3 times geographically larger than India as India is also 3 times larger than Pakistan 😄
Modi is the only CM in India's history who visited China 12 times as a CM. After Godhra riots when US/UK banned Modi from getting a visa, China recruited Modi as its agent to increase Chinese exports to India. Reason Modi kept increasing imports from China even after Galwan clash resulting in the death of 20 Indian soldiers and kidnapping of 10, who were released later. Modi also defended China by saying :"Na koi ghusa hai...". On September 10, 2020 Modi signed away parts of India to China in Moscow. No news of this in the Indian media. As long as Modi is in power there will be no war and China will keep grabbing Indian land without fear of retaliation.
But who can stop China from doing better than US??? India??? In fact, many aspects China is better than US now. Go and do some research about China developments.
bwahaha you want to checkmate China when you are playing tiddlywinks😅😅 China is always at least 8 steps ahead of india - you should clean up your slums and install more toilets first before thinking about chess. 🤣🤣
China got great moment to free its Nabour countries ( Sikh RAJJ , KHALISTAN ) and others make it easy for the whole world , KHALISTAN must need its share to the Arabian sea
Not only Sikh but also for Kashmir, Sikkim, Nagaland, 7 sister States. I have even heard Kerala and Tamil will benefit too....Any Indian States wants independence will benefit....
If like that type of war happen india would unite even more . In North East ;south etc Prior 1962 there were many seperitist movements in india . In 1962 war a wave of nationalism sparked across the country and the people . Every person was ready to donate money to fight the war . Those who were seperitists automatically supported india and india excluding the communist party which supported china due to ideological differences . War in India brings people together actually . And this happened repeatedly ...😊
@@loveblindhate9318 Indian demography has changed. From every state, 30 - 50% people have out and lives in other states... Breaking India is Pak & China's dream, which was possible before 1962. China did one good thing in 1962, United India , 1975 & 71 helped further. Still there are few people who are taking money from outside are creating this type of statesments
@@nirmalbhel3231 First, breaking India is NOT and Never Pakistan nor China's dream. When you watch anti China news like Wion and others funded channels is the problem. India govt. policies are ones who is breaking India up. Second, China isn't competing with India, they are competing with US and Europe. China's economy is about 5x of India's plus their have high tech. that India don't have....In the 60's and 70's, China was poorer than India and backward due to Western sanctions. China's ugly 'divorce' with Soviet hurt them too. In the 70's, Soviet took India's side, China had ZERO military support from any country. Soviet aided India in the 1971 war also or else they would have lost....Third, will be my question to you - what percent of Indian people is living under poverty, be honest now.....There is a difference between knowingly lie and unknowingly lie....The latter is called 'intellectual slave', made famous by an Indian scholar....
I don't know why people think superpowers or imperialists are different in keeping a third challenger down. In politics, especially the past two centuries, when both sides cannot definitely defeat each other, finding another country which's enormous enough to divide the spoils is quite compromised. Even Barack Obama had preached the alliance he called Chimerica in 2007, which was rejected and harshly criticized by citizens from both sides at that time.
I disagree on the point by Pravin that China started the war with India in 1962. From what I know, the Indian Prime Minister at that time PM Nehru deducted that China was very weak and India should take the opportunity to attack China and take more territories. However, his plan backfired and India lost badly. At that time, China could have kept he disputed territory but was too generous returning the disputed territory and Indian prisoners of war to India.
I don't know what kind of history they teach you in PRC, but that's absolutely incorrect!
And we have immense data & historical evdience to support that!
No history education is required on either side. A few simple questions can clarify the logic:
What benefits did the 1962 war bring to China? Nothing, no land, no honor;
What harm has it brought to China?
At that time, the relationship between China and the United States and the Soviet Union was not good, and India was just the opposite. Therefore, fighting against India was a huge diplomatic risk.
It is neither beneficial nor full of risks. Why does China want to attack India and India still loses?
The only answer is that India attacked China.
@@jishe8957 Ah! The mindless conspiracy theorist school of history & analysis!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
By that same logic, exactly the same things can be said for Indian side. IN fact, India lost territory! So, by your (asinine) logic, China must have started the war...!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Fortunately, we don't have to resort to hypothetical & puerile what-ifs & concocted scenarios. We have reams of data/evidence!
@@shantanusapru In the 1962 war, although India was severely beaten, it did not lose any land or pay compensation. It lost nothing but humiliation, right?
@@jishe8957 I really can't argue with people who don't know basic facts...
For starters, just read the Encyclopaedia Britannica's entry on the 1962 Indo-China war.
Just quoting a relevant portion (as YT doesn't allow to post URLs): "At the conclusion of the conflict, China retained control of about 14,700 square miles (38,000 square km) of territory in Aksai Chin."
Oh my goodness. India should simply be broken up into separate Nations eg. Khalistan (Sikhs), Kashmir Muslims, & other nations with the following ethnic groups:
Hindi 43.6%
Bengali 8%
Marathi 6.9%
Telugu 6.8%
Tamil 6.7%
Gujarati 4.6%
Urdu 4.2%
Kannada 3.6%
The Hindus are a miniority & cursed with their Caste System.
and why "should" it be? what will that achieve? and how
Bachkana comment
CCP propaganda. The Chinese military is a paper war machine. Chinese economy imploding. Xi out of his depth. West is winning the long game
is on the ultimate agend of murica..
Hi Julian Craze.. Nehru has done a few good things for India, one among those is DEEP STATE, which actually controls center, Military and Govt. State Govt are kind of independent but no one can think of separation.. no matter what Govt comes at center, India's policy at a broad level will not change. Over past Indian have learned one thing... UNITED WE STAND DIVIDED WE FALL. So you dream will never come true
Why would China make trouble with India if India behaves in a friendly manner? India should reflect on history when talking about the disputed territory in the Himalayas. Instead, India has taken an opportunistic attitude on this issue, n appears to have a chip on its shoulder with regard to China! JKH
India wants trouble with both pakistan and Chinese.
😉😉😉😉😉
Because pakistan and China both are not democracy.
Thank you pakistan for being islamic state of pakistan and China being people autocracy of Chinese.😉😉😉
Why did China enter galwan valley in 2020 and killed Indian soldiers when the two countries had no-weapons-use agreement?
@@anuradharaghavan872China didn't cross that river, Indian soldier did. you can see in the footage, carve on the mountain side are Chinese flag. and the Indian can be seen crossing the river. also the India soldier didn't get killed by weapons. more of them died to exposure because of the freezing water. the confrontation was actually very small, the death was due mostly to weather and how the Indian were not ready to deal with their wounded quickly in a very hostile environment.
Because of repel of article 370 threatened China and the speech of Amit in parliament that we will take Aksai chin from China that why China had the right and it did enter Galwan, but why u say they entered according to bhakts no one entered
@@ahmadkidwai3141
Pakistani and Chinese soowar bakths. Know there can never be peace in South Asia with permission of India.
Should ask themselves why all your neighbors are moving away from you and getting closer relationship with China? Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Maldives and now Bhutan. If you hasn't done anything wrong to all these neighbors, then what is the reason for them to moving away from you and getting closer with someone you see as your enemy?
You do not know the condition of Indian people now - we have no voice in this 'new India'
Like it or not, China will always be India's neighbour. It's better for neighbours to get along than not. In my view, their border disputes, which stem from the British Empire's overreach, could and should be settled with reasonableness and realistic accommodation from both sides, and not be allowed to be used by opportunistic politicians, ambitious military establishments, and 3rd party countries as an excuse to incite nationalistic fervors for their own interests.
After all these decades, it should be clear neither side could impose its will entirely on the other over a sparsely populated but expansive and difficult terrain.
China has demonstrated that it can settle border disputes reasonably with their neighbours, as in the case of Russia, Kazakhstan, Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan, etc. Only in cases where 3rd party interests, namely the U.S.A., intervenes and supports the other side, or the other side takes unilateral actions that violate its interests or previously agreed conditions, would China use its military to protect its sovereignty.
Even today, India maintains 4 times the troop strength than China does at their border. Pretty good indication of the difference in their attitudes and intentions.
I look forward to seeing a demilitarized border with joint patrols for law enforcement purposes only.
Awww.. right British Empire's overreach as compared to some Chinese dynasty's land grab, right?! At least the Republic of India rightfully inherited the realm from the British Empire. The same can't be said about Mao's PRC though.
@@jarjarbinks3193 How did the British Empire acquire its lands in the East?
It hasn’t even wiped the shit off its own butt, so how do you Indians “inherit” it with such joy?
@@jarjarbinks3193there was no India back then 😂
@@Cheesecake99YearsAgo There was no China either just 60 years back as that area was under Japanese control!
@@Cheesecake99YearsAgo Prior to the Japanese, it was the Manchus and therefore it wasn't the Han China either!
I hope this happens sooner than later so that we sikhs, kashmiris, nagas repeat the mukiti vahini path, leading to our Independence from colonial union of india. We will miss no chance to make alliance with Chinese Pak forces and create our version of mukiti vahini during the war
You are a canadian khalistani shikh,
but indian shikhs are not khalisthanis.
And 50% of population of punjab is non shikh.
@@pradipray1251 Learn to spell Sikh first and then return and write something that makes sense
Chup saala band gobi. Teri pagdi mein tatti kar na chahiye.
Great point for most part, but I don't thnk China will initiate a war against India unless provoked harshly.
it is true. after China settle the difference between U.S. and China. it might be the time to put India to its rightful place...
"A mouse got very happy that Cat agreed to cooperate with mouse and began moving forward with flaunting its tail........But what awaited it in the end was a Lion."
U think this is a small Country like Taiwan or Philippine's that China can easily wage war and walk away🤣🤣.....u must be dreaming👌.
India is not even in the minds of Chinese policy makers. If any Indian honestly look at his own country and had been to China, India is way behind China in all fields. Best concentrate to alleviate its poverty and caste system than to keep making China the focus. The border dispute is just Modi's way to distract Indians from introspection.
At the end of the day, China will win if they go to war
@@sagar9703bha Rats 😂
@@sagar9703Suckdeep the PLA is having a BBQ picnic party in depsang plains, gogra hot springs and demchok while Modi is begging for status quo ante 😂
I have to say I find it very bizarre that China would want a war with India in the next few years. Yes capacity wise China can, with many countries, such as Phillipines. But territory is not the strategic goal, neither is the BRI. And BTW I don't think India can hinder BRI.
If you happen to read Sun Tzu, you might find him saying to battle using real soldiers and shedding blood is the worst strategy. The best is the conquest of hearts. Actively attacking India would be beyond stupid political wise.
A war with India? 😂 Whether people like it or not,
USA, China, Russia, India are top 4 ranked in military... These 4 countries going to war means a recession that world won't be able to control... This is not Soviet era where one country can fall and rest can move on.. 😅
This video is soo dumb... The best example is Ukraine and Russia... Let's say Russia is equal to China in military even though Russia is far experienced just like India and USA with border conflicts and terrorism(even though China has capabilities, remember, China main power is it's navy not army or airforce) ...
Let's just assume China is equal to Russia, then... Is he saying Ukraine is equal to India? 😅
I mean, It doesn't matter how powerful China is... Before India China war ends, entire world economy will be destroyed..
A war without escalation? Both China and India doesn't have capability to contain the war in just one region... It'll spread like forest fire...
Soo all this assumption about China and India war needs to go... Because we won't have any war even in distant future.. Border conflict is geopolitical move where both loose few soldiers to prove point but people thinking it'll escalate to war needs to grow up...
China is increasing troops in border 😂biggest joke..
If China is soo powerful, why haven't they taken Taiwan yet? Imagine not being able to take Taiwan but acting like you can take Indian land 😅
Even if China becomes as well as capable as USA, they won't be stupid to start a war with India because USA will take advantage and destroy China..
The only one who'll take advantage of China-India war is Pakistan but India can hold Pakistan at bay... So India and China won't win if they start a war... USA will be the most beneficial...
Amerika has vast experience in creating RED FLAGS. In all shades.
If your master Amerika wants you to fight China, you will.
@@THUGPUTINif you understand that a war between China and India will benefit the US then you should know that the US will on,y supply weapons to India, they will never supply troops or join you in your wars, that way they can make money from you and later they can take both China and India with Russia not having the economy to fight the US, this leaves the US full world domination, the end game…
The reason why the US is so against China is because they are changing the rules, they want a multipolar world and this threatens the US’s hegemony. China has never claimed to want hegemony, this is the rhetoric of the west and India…
@@THUGPUTIN 4th? India can't even manufacture bullets, 4th in what? India lacks war resources and capital, what does it rely on? Malnourished poor soldiers?🙄🙄
@@THUGPUTINA quick fight and quick retreat is possible, as in 1962, with the aim of reducing India's national strength and balancing the power in the Indian Ocean, so that the Indian Ocean can form the pattern of Southeast Asia today.
I am not sure that China did start the 1962 war. Why would they withdraw afterwards? I certainly hope they don't decide on a war in 2024 either, although China does consider Arunshal Pradesh part of Xizang, which it historically was.
Never was, the locals there are Christian and some are Buddhist
There are no Han Chinese there
@@Rudraksh-ql4ce so there were no hindus ever in xizang. it was under chines empire control for more than 1000 years
Never prepare for future war but talk and walk on preventing future war....build trust and collaborate on economy developments
Have you heard of the quote "If you want peace, be prepared for war" ?
I'm Chinese. Believe me, China has always pursued a policy of peace and friendship. As long as India does not make the mistakes of 1962, China and India can have good neighborly friendship. Moreover, India should show the courage to correct historical mistakes.
what historical 'mistakes' ?
Bharat of today is Not India of '62.
Free Tibet
@@bhabhubb6481free khalistan
@@aryaman05 Your comment is full of provocation and meaningless. In our Chinese eyes, India has never experienced a real war. The Indian army also lacks combat effectiveness.
@@bhabhubb6481 Xizang is an inalienable part of China's territory. Since the Yuan Dynasty, the central government has always exercised effective jurisdiction over Xizang. The Tibetan people are an important member of the Chinese national family. Xizang was called "Tubo" in the Tang and Song Dynasties, "Uszang" in the Yuan and Ming Dynasties, and "Tanggute" and "Tubot" in the Qing Dynasty. It has been called "Xizang" since the reign of Kangxi in the Qing Dynasty. On May 23, 1951, Xizang was peacefully liberated. After the Xizang rebellion was pacified in 1959, the central government began to exercise full and direct jurisdiction over Xizang. On September 9, 1965, the Xizang Autonomous Region was officially established. On December 23, 2019, absolute poverty was basically eliminated in Xizang, and the whole region was lifted out of poverty.
The McMahon Line was first drafted in 1913, and the treaty to ratify them (Simla Accords) was never signed by the Republic Of China(ROC) who had just overthrown the Qing dynasty. There was no such thing as the McMahon Line in 1890, and China isn't disputing where the Line was drawn, she's disputing the validity of the Line in its entirety. The primary Indian claim is that the ROC did sign the Simla Accords because a British official called Olaf Caroe fabricated a narrative in 1938 where the ROC signed the Simla Accords (they didn't) and ceded parts of Tibet to the Raj.
In 1963 a British diplomat compared a pre-1938 treaties compendium with the post-Caroe compendium and found that Caroe had changed the note on the ROC's not signing the Simla Accords into one where the ROC signed it and considers the Indo-Tibetan border finalised. Nehru picked up a copy of Caroe's fabricated compendium so he got the impression that his country was legally entitled to more than she actually was. Compounding this was the US' decision to add fuel to the flames by declaring the McMahon Line as the legitimate boundary in an attempt to contain the spread of communism, despite reservations from the US State Department and protests from the fiercely non-communist Chiang Kai-Shek, leader of the ROC.
However, we all know Nehru irreversibly altered his country's relations with China in 1962, so by 1963, when the fabrication was discovered, it was already too late to stem the tide of Indian nationalism based on the false compendium entry. And that leaves us with the situation today, in the aftermath of a British attempt to de jure carve out a piece of Chinese territory which failed but had some success de facto, then a British fabrication of her failed attempt to carve out Chinese territory, then an Indian acceptance of the British fabrication alongside American endorsement, and a Chinese refusal to accept the fabrication as anything remotely legal.
Some Indians recognise that they don't actually have a legal claim to South Tibet, so they've begun using a different claim in that the people living in South Tibet want to be part of India more than China; in essence, a claim based on the principle of self-determination. This is India's secondary claim. However, as history has shown time and time again (Catalonia, Confederate States, Taiwan, Corsica, Chechnya, Tibet, Naxalites), without the permission of the larger body, a smaller section of the population will not be allowed to separate from its original country regardless of what they want.
A much more detailed account of the McMahon Line and its history is available here, written by Peter Lee who, contrary to impressions given by his surname, is not at all Chinese.
Is there any good links to reading material where I can learn more on this
A decade since Modi came to power his supporters claim that Modi is all talk no action. They claim Modi is happy to be at par with Ethiopia and Somalia, his only policy is domestic politics
Indians harbour the dream/fantasy of being considered as the world's foremost No.1 superpower BUT there's a problem, a BIG problem that is.. India is not a permanent member of the UNSC with veto powers. The hallmark of genuine superpower status
Q: What can Indians do in order to be accepted as a permanent member of the UNSC with veto powers?
Note: This is my favourite, simply because not a single Indian can answer this one 😂 just plenty of blank talks about their birthday wishes but no answers
Chinese are UNSC permanent member but all they can do is go for cease fire on request of pakistan. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
P5 have the power but they are controlled by super powers like india, Israel, Japan Germany etc. 😆😆😆😆😆😆
I wonder why the Chinese were given Veto in 1971 ? China was extremely weak , poor and destitute back then
They will have to please all P5 at the same time, or try to do the same as what Gaddafi did in the UNSC.
Indian love to say “we will see”, and nothing can be seen for decades.
China officially announced it lost 4 soldiers in the Galwan Incident while India official figure stood at 20*
Indians: China lost 40 according to the CIA, China lost 44 according to Russia, China lost 50 according to Lord Krishna 😁
*Actually it is doubtful China suffered any casualties at all. Its officially announced 4 deaths was meant to calm things down with India 😂
Countries that lead the world in 44 critical technology* sectors:
1. China = 37
2. USA = 7
3. UK = 0
4. Germany = 0
5. Japan = 0
*In fields like defence, space, robotics, energy, the environment, biotechnology, artificial intelligence (AI), advanced materials and key quantum technology areas
Source: Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI)
**India leads the world in the field of cow husbandry, which is neither a technology nor critical
Your podcast is very informative. Based on the facts in Hamas Israeli conflict will definitely have impact on Indian elections which was not the content of the podcast. Modi made blunder after blunder and put nation on the spot.
Nope... It's already clear that Muslim will again vote for congress and fail big time... Karnataka is already suffering from this... Bjp was smart to give away karnataka and showcase of congress governance.... They couldn't make Delhi as example of freebies politics because Delhi is too left and congress and bjp won't win Delhi anytime soon... So its AAP and same goes to punjab... I don't see AAP losing punjab to congress... Maybe a coalition with bjp might come to power..
Isreal - Palestinian conflict will help BJP... How? Well kerala support to Palestinian and Hamas leader directly talking will help bjp big time...
I. N. D. I. A had great start and perhaps had the opportunity to put bjp under them but unity is what they lack.. The biggest problem is rahul Ghandi himself...
Rahul cannot win without outside support, ie..... Global leftist support...
Sashi tharoor and Sachin pilot are two most powerful leaders congress have and they don't even promote them.. 😅
It is jf 17 Chinese and pakistan bluder will make modi win. 😆😆😆😆😆😆
China and India are ancient civilizations. Its best they cooperate than go to war. These two BRICS members must develop trust and not fall in to believing war will solve their border issues. These two great nations together will create global synergy.
India is neither a nation, nor civilisation or great. India is home to 3 ditinct civilisations and dozens of nations. 3 civilisations Indo aryan, Dravidian and sino tibetic (north east nations). Nations are Punjabi, kashmiri, Gujarati, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Kannada etc
In 1962, the Chinese military officers in the frontline reported to Chairman Mao in telegram: India army 一触即溃.
China's annual surplus from India is approximately US$100 billion, making it the second largest surplus country after the United States. I don't see the significance of a Sino-Indian war when China is focusing on economic construction and constantly improving people's living standards. Factories and technology are more valuable than land.
Fun fact: China shares land borders with 14 of its neighbours. Over the years, it has settled border disputes with 12 of them, with Bhutan and India left. Hopefully, border disputes with Bhutan would be settled soon. It can be considered a success by China even if India is left with unsettled disputes. Because everyone knows you can't settle anything with Indians. That's why all its neighbours prefer Beijing over New Delhi
another fact:India is the only country on earth that has problems with all its neighbors.🙄🙄
Henry kissenger: "To be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal.”
As always, excellent analysis.
Let's remember that if the Americans are biding time to prepare for war with China, so are the Chinese. After Ukraine war, Russo China military development cooperation is expected is reach its acme. In my opinion, these intervening few years will help China more than the Americans.
I agree. According to the Pentagon, the Chinese building capacity is more than 200 times bigger than America capacity. They can churn out subs, jets, ships, missiles very fast and with increasing quality.
China don't invent US does. Just by copying shape, once cannot build 5th gen fighter. US is near 6th gen. Israel has helped China in developing their defense tech. After Hamas incident, Israel now will not believe China
@@Liboch Pravin is a ChSO4 (a.k.a., Ch*tium Sulphate)
But what about the quality?
More Jf 17 blunders on the way
@@INDIAN-sx9kc Jf 17 much better than poor Tejas how many Tejas been purchased by Indian how many been export ? 😂😂
The most funniest part is The most finest part is India producing nothing but Claim they have quality? on? nothing?🎉🎉
Just let you know, very few people in China know about 1962. Personally speaking, I don't think it is a war, Chinese only mobilized 30k troops which is nothing. In a real war against Vietnam in 1980, China mobilized half a million troops. So if Vietnam can make a good relationship with China, why can't India do? Indian government needs to move forward.
Inferiority complex at play. Period.
Superiority complex mean you do what you need to do at your own pace and capability. When you start comparing means you are worried and not confident.@@SA-xm4jk
@@SA-xm4jkhey are worried that their beggar neighbor will come to steal things, and that beggar is always stealing and then pretending to be innocent.
Get your facts right. The mobilisation was of 8 divisions. Roughly 80K-100K troops
I have thousand reason to show that India started 1962 war .. Then china responded..
I find the comments section entertaining, in fact better than watching a movie. Mr. Pravin spoke for 16 minutes and 1962 border war only came in at 13 minutes. No serious discussion (discussion in a sense, no replies for a given comment) about what he spoke in the first 13 minutes. Everyone is excited and jumped in for 1962 war:
The usual suspects comments were:
1. battle harden solders,
2. 1967 we won
3. We gave them bloody nose
4. The list goes on, I have to use mnemonic technique to list them all.
Alternate viewpoints is typically labelled CCP bots.
This channel is out and out ccp's mouth piece. Take it easy.
@@Ajay-vf6di You know what CPC mouthpiece look like? GO check CGTN, Global Times, People's Daily, Xinhua, etc. They don't talk about war with any other countries so openly. I am sorry, but this channel is not qualified to be CPC mouth piece.
@@Ajay-vf6di You are proving my point. Give your counter argument instead of CCP bot as I have mentioned. Otherwise, don't bother to write a comment.
@@turtlesoup8134 they maintain different kinds of mouthpieces. Some are sophisticated and some are cheap feet licking once. This channel is the second type.
If at all china want war. Bring it on, no need to send this pimps to create a narrative.
He says humbling india 😂😂😂😂 OMG
China started believing it's own propaganda. This are side effects of being too much fake.
@@vijayarajan3276 here is my argument.
If china want to start a war, india will go for it.
Ur r worried about fire power, that can be borrowed like israil is doing right now.
If ur nerves about getting close to West, that is the most important thing to do right now.
Left has destroyed india with there bullshit ideology. India won't get better opportunity to open up to West.
What about Russia? They can understand, coz even they don't want Chinese domination in the region.
Finally the point is simple. If we have to choose between two scoundrels West and china. It is wise to go with a known scoundrel because we already know how he operates. This new clown, doesn't worth.
A long bow to draw by a warmongering armchair warrior. We should take every opportunity to talk peace and goodwill.
That is ugly to hope others having bad relationships
Mr Sawhney rings the bell often and with enthusiasm, one of this time he may be right. And behold …
Aiyah! China want to make love with India not war. A successful love-in with India will also 'humble' both sides the proper way.😁
1962, 1967, Galwan Dokalam are examples of love!
@@nirmalbhel3231 Those are just passing quarrels between two lovers who have been in love with each other for thousands of years. And there was a jealous and malicious outside third party sowing lies during those three quarrels. But like all lies, their effects don't last. Let the love-making continue.
@@simonchowkwchow5083
@@simonchowkwchow5083 India and world have realized.. Never believe Chinese Communist Party. China and Chinese and Indians don't want war but the party will do it.
@@nirmalbhel3231 Then let the BJP fight the Communist Party of China then. Don't let them bother the people of both India and China who want to make love not war.
Must teach the fox a lesson. The fox , play around , jumping up and down, dancing, creating snoring noices near the lion’s ears. The fox , all along , never has any self esteem and lacks independent thinking, gaining no respect from other nearby animals, and this fox , moreover always hide behind the tiger’s back, shouting very loud to the sleeping lion . Now the tiger has decided not to ambush or suddenly bite the lion’s tail, so to say, the borned- with - no -self -respect fox is worried now just because it knows what it has been dancing around for. The fox find out that it after all lacks sinking jaws like that of the lion. Animal kingdoms will not respect this fox.
High on some stuff left over by the Brits?! Stop hallucinating too much. India doesn't change tunes based on what the leader does the next day.
Forgetting about the time that Mao jumped into bed with US to spite his former commie big brother the USSR?
So to say, there is this , now, unveiled what exactly is this borned- no- self- respect fox ? Not to say struggling for 300 years without a fight, not even a claw fight or without a bite, how can the lion respect the fox? The fox just listen to the tunes of Dor Ray Me. Animal kingdom will not respect this type of foxy behavior.
China lost 1967 war to India and then to Vietnam.. China can roar only
Every Indian should learn from the wisdom of India's greatest sage of our time Jayant Bhandari, his TRUTH Will hopefully allow India to make peace with China.
LAC, line of actual control is the source of China Indian war. In my humble opinion, the British were playing with words. That’s the British’s mindsets. However both Indian and are very capable of making their own words too. Such as using LMC for line of mutual control? Make them the free trade zones, instead killing. There’s nothing to gain for both sides. Just change one word will bring tremendous gains for both side.
Pravin can you explain to us what would be the objectives the Chinese would want to accomplish in this short war ?
Cooperation in BRI. No skirmishes in the naval security. BIMSTEC cancellation. China won Myanmaar, Maldives, Srilanka, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. China increases influence in Afghanistan. Now India got Bhutan and Nepal. But politician are bragging about Pok, akhand bharat and gilgitbaltistan. South East Asia being bussiness hub than India. Buying Weapons from anywhere for diplomatic purpose, no use.
if there is war, it is to break the India US alliances. like Ukraine, US will not help, India would feel betray and pointless to work with US anymore and so the Quad would collapse on it own. thus to avoid this, India should reduce it ties with US military and seek Russian counterbalance.
@@lagrangeweiChina vs India, which one will Putin choose at the moment? The answer is simple. The issue is far more complicated.
Meeting between two blind men will not bring any good to world.
Excellent analysis sir jee.
A Very well detailed subject in short version..should be longer video
Sir will be nice to hear your opinion on india VS Canada and India VS Qatar ongoing confrontations.
With Modi's administrations policies on economy and defence, India has lost both its economic and military utility for USA. Add to that the misadventures of desi James Bond, India is now more of a problem than solution to anything in western eyes. Now the question is, how much India cooperates with China. Coming of Nawaz Sharif, reopening of cricket ties and ISI killing all anti India elements, is an indication that India might join BRI. If that happens, then we might see Americs leveraging Taliban and Sikhs to its advantage. Interesting times ahead.
China has reduced BRI from 1 trillion to $110 billion. BRI is gone.. no country benefitted from it. Pak Sri Lanka are good examples
@@nirmalbhel3231what is the source of your claim?
Canadian khalisthani hallucinates
@@HarjeetSingh-ev8vk His got none - just a blind Indian nationalist - way too many of them, is like in America. Our American govt. + the whole West fear the BRI because of a new system block is coming up in which will destroy the value of USD. We are in trouble if BRI succeed, is why our govt. via NED been funding oppositions both militarily and politically, this include India...The Fact, Taiwan DPP 'Japanese blood' govt. is funded by NED.... China just invested in Afghanistan + Pakistan on the mineral sector. Indian's offer was rejected by the Taliban...Pride with the mindset of caste system is going to destroy India...I was indoctrinated to hate CPC since birth like how Indians and Pakistanis...but I despise liars more...
The most stupid assesment I've come across till now. The fact of the matter remains that India's military capacity has more than doubled since 2008 be it in combat capabilities, modernisation or mobility. India is a neutral country and it has no will to either join the west or the Chinese. We have our own ambitions
I DISAGREE...please read the book of "The Art of War" by Sun Tzu if you really wanted to understand the Chinese philosophy.
“The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.”
― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
“The greatest victory is that which requires no battle.”
― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
Tell me, why would China go to war with India when the Chinese are winning years or decades ahead in every sectors?
Just speechless. Great insight and knowledge
Please put us wise on Hammad Israel war
We consider you a very impartial n intelligent analyst
Please
Excalant explaction ❣️👍❣️🙂
Why bring India into the discussion??
Read the book “India’s War with China”
The author Neville Maxwell had access to documents that are still remain classified in India as they contain sensitive material
With trade deficit of 8:1, China will avoid any armed conflict with India, though they are more advanced, pro active and equipment. India too is dependent on Chinese imports.
They already achieved their strategic objective in Ladakh what they wanted without firing a single shot.
Thats true but they can create uneasy in business by delaying supplies. Think it this way.
Exports to India account for less than 3% of China's total exports. This really isn't a problem.🙄🙄
they may not have 'fired a single shot' but they did bring in crude weapons and kill our soldiers and their soldiers got killed in return too. so, the galwan valley incident cannot be classified under 'without firing a single shot'.
@@anuradharaghavan872 did their soldiers get killed or is what GOI has fed it's audience
@@safashaikh2894 Since you have access to the Internet go find out yourself.
Listen carefully Indians!
China has $3.5 trillion dollars worth of forex reserves. Plus China has $2 trillion dollars worth of loans to BRI countries. On top of that, China has $3 trillion dollars worth of assets globally like mineral rights, ports, start-ups, stocks, sovereign wealth funds etc. Add to that, China recorded $880 billion dollars worth of trade surplus last year alone. While India only got $500 plus billion forex reserves and India wants to counter China? This is not even a David vs. Goliath kinda thing, this is an ant taking on a T-rex 😂
Joke of the century.😆😆😆😆
All they got is dollars which is the currency of USA.😆😆😆😆😆🫣🫣🫣
Hello ttui89.
Do you want dollars or Chinese yen.😆😆😆😆😆😆
Excellent and honest Analysis, a true thinker and writer
Lol😆😆😆😆😆
If you pakistani and Chinese trust USA and India 🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
You know what is india doing with kashmir.
China thinks strategically.
Peace with India would be a preferred scenario for them.
They don’t need a war to boost their image.
They have no need for more land in the border region with India.
However, they will certainly protect their border against Indian adventurism.
Great analysis and a timely warning for us.
Biden 🗣️👉Xi Jinping DICTATOR 🤭😂😂 hipocricy
WOW great Analysis.
As always very informative and knowledgeable. Thank you for sharing Sir
Quit strange that you as an indian were laughing on war with india and china ??
Last time you said the same when Both Xi & Biden meet India is in Risk But After that Pelosi landed In Taiwan You did not Make video Now India is not in Risk Again you came today Premature not even hours Biden said Dictator further is comming pl Make video When India is De risked only Making Videos India is at Risk for past years and nothing Happing is Boring at lest next 6 months what will happen please tell What abot 2+2 recently concluded in Delhi is it only Time pass For blinken & Austin
Kuch bhi bolta hai Pravin. No war probable between India-China. Regular skirmishes may continue. And pravin, your understanding of AI is clearly close to zer, bakwas band kar
Are there any Indians ？ please tell me is the British Empire's colonization of India over?
This was the plan all along
I always hoped it would be the tortoise and the hare story with India - China. It still may be as Xi looks overly confident and overly proud and their population demographic failure has begun and economically they are on the descent. But i do worry that Indias rise has started 2 decades too late in order to confront China. Because China is on the decline and its Superpower status is slowly disappearing, it may well want confrontation with India to prove something to the world. Satyameva Jayate 🙏🕉️. I am very proud that the Vedic people of Bharat have never been a coveting, aggressive people. They have only ever been a in search of eternal knowledge.
Why as neighbours one should not be involved in taking side thus will hurt all sides in the near future.
Great presentation, mashallah.
Chinese agent speaking in India. Thank god this fellow was dishonorably discharged from the army ( even during congress times).
Proof.
@@mysmartkryptonite354 Prove this world is a oblait spheroid. Even with those countless pictures from space, you will find countless people contradicting your arguments. 🤣🤣🤣
why he is not making any news
No new video i m waiting for new video sir
Where are you sir
We want your view on israel vs muslim fight
Major issue in meeting is trading rules of oil trade in middle east and Iran sanctions.
If you want to rule the world you need to control the oil. Real issue is petrodollar trades.
Russia is actually Chinese friend
No disrespect, but what the heck does that meeting have to do with your country? A bit Persecutory Type, it appears.
Who said they are in brics.
Is this correct that IDF used AI in making an incursion in Gaza?
There should be a radical change.
Sir, Hindi mei bhi apna Vlog kijiye.Defence per aapka Vlogs bahut hi knowledge wala hota hai. Actual country ka conditions aap batate hain.
pravin sawhney = CHINESE HUMAN EXCRETA
Excellent vlog thanks for your efforts and comprehensive analysis. Well I agreed wd Mr.prawen that environment is very exclusive for China 🇨🇳 to have expedition against his neighbouring rival and USA already had given green signal in shape of tiewan that USA believed one China policy.
From disputed territory to disputed border. Pravenn Shanaya 😆😆
In 3 years narrative change.😆😆😆😆😆
Americans depend a lot over its and its allies naval power. Could that be a game changer for the US.
No all allies depend on US
To say China🇨🇳 is scared of India🇮🇳 is like saying India's scared of Pakistan🇵🇰 ! The reason is simple, China's GDP is 7 times that of India's as India's GDP is 8 times that of Pakistan. China is 3 times geographically larger than India as India is also 3 times larger than Pakistan 😄
Joke of the century.😆😆😉😆
The meeting was Bharat bad luck?
The way US has told Xi dictator, beast... is good for India. More FDI to India
Modi is the only CM in India's history who visited China 12 times as a CM. After Godhra riots when US/UK banned Modi from getting a visa, China recruited Modi as its agent to increase Chinese exports to India. Reason Modi kept increasing imports from China even after Galwan clash resulting in the death of 20 Indian soldiers and kidnapping of 10, who were released later. Modi also defended China by saying :"Na koi ghusa hai...". On September 10, 2020 Modi signed away parts of India to China in Moscow. No news of this in the Indian media. As long as Modi is in power there will be no war and China will keep grabbing Indian land without fear of retaliation.
America Exceptionalism versus god's chosen people, who will win? Money will speak.
You are right. American Exceptionalism is a very dangerous idea created by political zionism.
👍👍👍
Funniest theory I'd ever heard of. Illogical.
Bhai sahib, kithayy?
We starting to miss the sound of your voice lol, don't worry ustad, just Pakistani humour. Stay blessed.
😂😂😂😂
✌️😁😁😁😁😁✌️
What happens when there is mushroom cloud on Beijing Shanghai and the pondis and bads
One condition, China must not do better US
But who can stop China from doing better than US??? India???
In fact, many aspects China is better than US now. Go and do some research about China developments.
India should find new & creative ways to tackle china. India can & should checkmate china. China is not invincible & India is not uncreative!
bwahaha you want to checkmate China when you are playing tiddlywinks😅😅 China is always at least 8 steps ahead of india - you should clean up your slums and install more toilets first before thinking about chess. 🤣🤣
!Bollywood, Indians are invincible in bollywood films.😉😉
do you need 16 mins to explain your points ?
China got great moment to free its Nabour countries ( Sikh RAJJ , KHALISTAN ) and others make it easy for the whole world , KHALISTAN must need its share to the Arabian sea
This man is Congress mouthpiece.
I think Global times
China WAR with INDIA be so beneficial for Sikh Nation ( KHALISTAN ZINDAABADD )
With old capital as Lahore as capital of Khalistan.. no one in India wants. More Sikhs lives in other states of India not in Punjab
Not only Sikh but also for Kashmir, Sikkim, Nagaland, 7 sister States. I have even heard Kerala and Tamil will benefit too....Any Indian States wants independence will benefit....
If like that type of war happen india would unite even more .
In North East ;south etc
Prior 1962 there were many seperitist movements in india .
In 1962 war a wave of nationalism sparked across the country and the people .
Every person was ready to donate money to fight the war .
Those who were seperitists automatically supported india and india excluding the communist party which supported china due to ideological differences .
War in India brings people together actually .
And this happened repeatedly ...😊
@@loveblindhate9318 Indian demography has changed. From every state, 30 - 50% people have out and lives in other states... Breaking India is Pak & China's dream, which was possible before 1962. China did one good thing in 1962, United India , 1975 & 71 helped further. Still there are few people who are taking money from outside are creating this type of statesments
@@nirmalbhel3231 First, breaking India is NOT and Never Pakistan nor China's dream. When you watch anti China news like Wion and others funded channels is the problem. India govt. policies are ones who is breaking India up. Second, China isn't competing with India, they are competing with US and Europe. China's economy is about 5x of India's plus their have high tech. that India don't have....In the 60's and 70's, China was poorer than India and backward due to Western sanctions. China's ugly 'divorce' with Soviet hurt them too. In the 70's, Soviet took India's side, China had ZERO military support from any country. Soviet aided India in the 1971 war also or else they would have lost....Third, will be my question to you - what percent of Indian people is living under poverty, be honest now.....There is a difference between knowingly lie and unknowingly lie....The latter is called 'intellectual slave', made famous by an Indian scholar....
I don't know why people think superpowers or imperialists are different in keeping a third challenger down. In politics, especially the past two centuries, when both sides cannot definitely defeat each other, finding another country which's enormous enough to divide the spoils is quite compromised. Even Barack Obama had preached the alliance he called Chimerica in 2007, which was rejected and harshly criticized by citizens from both sides at that time.