*Are these turboprops fast enough? Did I miss any turboprop aircraft in this list? To watch more interesting airplane videos, check these out:* Top 5 Cheapest Turboprops 2021-2022 | Price & Specs ruclips.net/video/G7n1-3KgOuo/видео.html Top 3 Airbus Passenger Jets 2021-2022 | Price & Specs ruclips.net/video/_sgtqEQFprQ/видео.html Top 3 Dassault Falcon Business Jets 2021-2022 | Price & Specs ruclips.net/video/lB1OWW2WFJY/видео.html
Please add 3 important points : (1) maximum cabin height for passengers (not being anle to decently stand up in a plane makes any trip tiring), (2) stability of the aircraft in rough weather and (3) length and type of runway needed for take-off and landing. Without these 3 points, how can one decently compare different aircraft ? Thank you.
You started the video discussing top picks for business/personal use. In the game of "Which One Doesn't Belong", you went wildly off base with the Dash-8. As others have pointed out, the TBM 940 or Epic E1000gx would have made more sense of apples to apples.
We fly a Cessna 441 Conquest II. Our chirp laughs at his friends flying King Air's as he slides past them with a 30 knot speed advantage. He loves those Garrett dash 10s. Make her climb like an angel.
When you first hear a P-190 in the sky, your head will snap up to find it. When you see it, your mouth will drop. It is the most distinctive aircraft, period ! There was a company that brought a fleet into the San Francisco airports: San Carlos for SFO, Oakland, and San Jose. Suddenly, they stopped flying. I sure miss watching them!
I'm a retired Navy Flyer who was used to cruising at FL400 & 400KIAS in my squadron's Lockheed S-3 Viking aircraft when practicing airways training when back home from deployment at the Naval Air Station. As a new subscriber, I was pleased to watch your Top 5 Private Jets & Top 5 Private Turboprops vids. As I've been a fan of the Piaggio P.180/EVO Avanti II twin-engine for some time, I was pleased to see it in the #1 position of your private turboprop ratings. I'm also a recent fan of the private Celera 500L single-engine ultra-modern V12 diesel/Jet A pusher, and would love to see these 2 compared. I suggest in your vids of these private jet & TP aircraft that you pay particular attention to the ranges and maximum cruising altitude/FL of each aircraft as advertised by the manufacturers, as well as the max cruise speed. I'd also like to see the Avanti II & Celera 500L compared to the private jets. Friends who are airline pilots advise me that the range, max cruise speed & max cruise altitude are not the only important measures of an aircraft. They maintain that the PT-6 in the Avanti II hasn't a good climb performance compared to the jets, gives a very slow time to complete climb out comparatively, thus affecting the range. I assume that this may be a concern for the Celera pusher, as well, but not really sure. Would love to have your perspective on these concerns. Thanks for some really interesting video!
The TBN 940 ($4.1 million) is my favorite turbo prop (not listed here). It's the only plane I know that can land by itself without pilot input should the pilot become incapacitated.
IMHO, You have a mixed class of turboprops here, and left out the number 1 altogether.. For single engine/1 pilot I would select the TBM 9xx as number 1, Pilatus PC12 number 2, Cessna Denali 3, Piper PA46/M600 4 and maybe the King Air 260 5, although the King Air is a twin and different class. The Dash 8 is a commercial plane with higher capacity that fly's scheduled routes. The Piaggio is a low volume twin of I think higher capacity, although I'm not very familiar with them. But the first 5 are the ones for personal/ business use. Hope that helps. 8) Again, JMHO --gary
The choice between the Dash-8 and the TBM series would depend on the specific mission and requirements. While the Dash-8 is a regional aircraft known for its capacity, the TBM series is renowned for its speed and agility. Do you have a particular mission or context in mind where you think one of these aircraft might be a better fit, or are you interested in comparing them for a specific purpose?
The Dash 8 seems out of place in this, but the other assessments were very good. We are looking to go to a turboprop and due to the quiet and size of the cabin the Avanti is in our consideration. Maintenance, and support will be the deal breaker, we are still evaluating. Of course the speed and efficiency of the Avanti is unmatched. I used to work these as an Air Traffic Controller (Washington ARTCC) and was amazed at the performance.
Pity l am not a multi millionaire as the Piaggio Avanti would be on my shopping list . Takes the fabulous Italians to design an amazing looking aircraft. Well done . Designed 4 Europe & the Americas. Unfortunately wouldn't get me from Australia to those destinations without a few lay overs . Other than that its perfect 😀👏👏
I'd like to see Pilatus pick up from where Piaggio left off. the Avanti Evo had a lot to offer, and Pilatus could have worked out the kinks and improved the craftsmanship that Piaggio missed, as well as beefing up parts support.
What specifically do you think was lacking in Piaggio’s craftsmanship? I’ve never heard anyone complain about that before. Plus they are still in production (barely, I’ll admit) so talking like Piaggio is gone is premature.
The Evo New York too San Fran none stop at what Speed? And yes the 940 and Epic , were are they? Is the Q400 presented in Exec config. If so waht is the range?
As an ex Q400 driver I can tell you that you’re 10 knots slow on the Q400. It can do 370 KTAS, although you are riding up a bit close against the speed limit, so yes 360 is what’s usually seen. It’s an amazing aircraft in terms of performance, but awful in turbulence (feels like you’re in a washing machine) and not a well designed aircraft for pilot ergonomics. Bombardier wanted to keep the design commonality with the 100/200/300 in order to maintain a common type rating. A pity, as no one uses it really.
@@jamesmcpeake3235 that’s fantastic! Would love to get my hands on one someday. I read somewhere that the P180 is slow in climb though so block times suffer? Standard climb in the Q400 is 210 KIAS but high speed climb of 235 is often used (in both cases reducing at higher altitudes). The Q400 easily overspeeds even on one engine so plenty of attention needs to be paid to power management and it’s slippery as heck, unlike most turboprops. The propellers acting as big drag discs just doesn’t happen due to the blade angle at flight idle essentially creating very little drag. Deceleration for 250KIAS below A100 usually starts at around 12,000 feet or higher if you’re heavy and particularly with tailwind. Anyway enough from me. Thanks for sharing!
You asked what other turbo props would be of interest and I like the Aero Commander 1000/900 twin turbo prop aircraft and its history. It is a great plane to fly and it is fast and reliable. The hardest part of the aircraft is to taxi it.
The Aero Commander 1000/900 is indeed an intriguing twin-turboprop aircraft with a rich history. Its reputation for speed and reliability is well-known. It's interesting to hear that taxiing can be a challenge - any tips or memorable experiences you'd like to share about flying it?
It would be nice to know the Take-off and Landing Distance required! Also can the Piaggio Evo take off and land on a Non-Finished Runway like the Pilatus 12 & 24 can? 🤔
The TBM 940 should have been right up there, the Epic also. I have no idea what the Dash 8-400 was doing on the list, yes its quick but is it relevant in this company?. A highly capable plane that gets overlooked even though it has the measure of much of the King Air range is the Fairchild Merlin 3c carries more further and faster than most, and from the 70,s
In your commentary you say the Piaggio Avanti Evo range is 2759 nautical miles, (you mean kilometres) In your information you get it correct it's range is actually 1490 nautical miles. New York to San Francisco is 2247 nautical miles
I liked the part where you said the -8 400/Q400 had noise reduction. Honestly this is the one aircraft I would not fly in anymore without having my noise cancelling headphones
The range of the Piaggio Avanti Evo you stated had 2700 nm range, I think is incorrect unless this year they improved the range from 1700 sm miles to 2700 nm? I have always liked the Piaggio design.
Thank you for pointing that out! You are correct; the Piaggio Avanti Evo indeed has a range of approximately 1,490 nautical miles (nm), and not 2,700. But it does have the equivalent 2,795 kilometers of range. I appreciate your attention to detail and your fondness for the Piaggio design. Which other turboprops would you like us to feature next?
Yes you miss out the SAAB 2000.... But you say that the PIAGGIO AVANTI P180 EVO flew from NEW YORK TO SAN FRANCISCO 2759 NAUTICAL MILES, BUT WITH HOW MANY PASSENGERS AND CREW AND BAGGAGE???
That's right, I haven't had the chance to look at the SAAB 2000 yet, but would love to feature it in future videos. As for the Piaggio Avanti P180 Evo's flight range, I forgot to mention that it's possible with a single stop at full load since the total distance is 4,139 km. The P180's range is actually 2,795 kilometers and not in nautical miles. Sorry for that oversight! What other features of the P180 stood out to you the most?
The Piaggio most certainly does not have a range of 2,700nm. It does have a range of 1,700nm, requiring one fuel stop to travel between NYC and San Fran. Also, no TBM? Poor research on the part of this video's creator.
Thank you! I was looking for someone else to have posted this error before doing it myself. Overstating the Piaggio’s range by over 1000 nm is egregious. Even so, the Piaggio would still be my top choice as well. It is a fabulous aircraft for many reasons. It does need some upgrades to its avionics, needs auto-throttle (P&W’s fault), and external serviceability for the toilet, etc. these may never happen as the company is struggling financially. They need a deep pockets buyer to take over and make these upgrades, possibly switching to an engine company that will give them auto-throttle if P&W won’t (which is too bad because P&W has the reliability). But the Piaggio has the speed, efficiency, passenger space, and range that no other plane in its class has. Nothing else comes close.
Flight fast SIngle engine Number one, EPIC E1000 GX with a top speed of 333 knots, it is not only the fastest but also the fastest rising one, an impressive 4,000 feet per minute, reaching a higher attitude, of 34,000 feet. its range and 1,385 nautical miles flying at 325 knots at 34,000 feet altitude.25 mar. 2021 Number two, Daher TBM 940 This turboprop owes its success to its remarkable performance, as well as to its equipment, unique in the category of single-engine turboprop, such as an auto-throttle which facilitates the automatic pre-adjustment of the speed, during the various phases of flight from the climb. until the approach; an automatic defrost system, and many more. The specifications of the Daher TBM 940 Maximum cruise speed in long range settings 252 KTAS 467 km / h Maximum cruising speed at 28,000 ft. 330 KTAS 611 km / h Climb time to 31,000 ft 18 min. 45 seconds Certified ceiling of 31,000 ft. 9,449 m. Takeoff distance 2380 ft. 726 m. Landing distance of 2,430 feet 741 m. Number one, EPIC E1000 GX It is a single engine Turboprops made in the USA, carrying six people. Its manufacturer sells it as the aircraft in its class with access to the largest number of smaller airports. with a top speed of 333 knots, it is not only the fastest but also the fastest rising one, an impressive 4,000 feet per minute, reaching a higher attitude, of 34,000 feet. its range and 1,385 nautical miles flying at 325 knots at 34,000 feet altitude. If von slower, at 265 knots, its range is 1650 nautical miles. Its engine is a 1200 horsepower Pratt & Whitney. Takeoff distance 2254 ft. Landing distance of 2,399 feet. It costs $ 3,850,000. Twin turbo prop Mitsubishi MU-2: Addictive performance - AOPA MU-2 has minimum speeds based on flap ... The short- body Solitaire tops out at 310 knots. MITSUBISHI MU-2: ADDICTIVE PERFORMANCE BEST BANG-FOR-THE-BUCK TURBOPROP high wing loading for both speed and a solid ride through turbulence, and over-built military-style construction with no life limit on the airframe. MU-2 is a rocket. The short-body airplanes can top out above 300 knots, initially climbing at nearly 3,000 fpm. Best altitudes are 20,000 to 28,000 feet, accordingly, its handling is transport-like, Trimmed up, it stays where it’s put and rides through bumps like a steamroller with its 65-lb/sq .ft wing loading. With the spoiler system, there is no adverse yaw. Twin engine Aerostar 702: Still The Fastest Forty years after its introduction, the Aerostar remains the world’s fastest, general aviation piston airplane-period
Scaling up the P.180 could be a game-changer for regional flights. What do you think would be the biggest challenge in making it work at a sensible price?
![Chino Pacas - Modo Capone (with Drake & Fuerza Regida) [Video Oficial]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zjv8TQ0gBkg/mqdefault.jpg)
*Are these turboprops fast enough? Did I miss any turboprop aircraft in this list? To watch more interesting airplane videos, check these out:*
Top 5 Cheapest Turboprops 2021-2022 | Price & Specs
ruclips.net/video/G7n1-3KgOuo/видео.html
Top 3 Airbus Passenger Jets 2021-2022 | Price & Specs
ruclips.net/video/_sgtqEQFprQ/видео.html
Top 3 Dassault Falcon Business Jets 2021-2022 | Price & Specs
ruclips.net/video/lB1OWW2WFJY/видео.html
Nice effort!!
@@ignorethis68 Thank you! Much appreciated.
How’d you miss the TBM 940/930
@Johnny Jamir get rickets
Please add 3 important points : (1) maximum cabin height for passengers (not being anle to decently stand up in a plane makes any trip tiring), (2) stability of the aircraft in rough weather and (3) length and type of runway needed for take-off and landing. Without these 3 points, how can one decently compare different aircraft ? Thank you.
I would say the TBM 940 should be on the list.
Agree
And the Epic E1000- both should be featured…
The TBM 940 with a speed of 330 knots/380 MPH would be the 2nd fastest on the List.
Agree
With considerably lower operating costs as well.
Epic E1000 too.
None of them even come close to the Otto Celera 500L.
Now that the Epic has received certification, it definitely makes this list. As does the TBM940. Nice video though.
The Piaggio Avanti P180!!!Super cool,fast and cost effective.
Indeed!
You started the video discussing top picks for business/personal use. In the game of "Which One Doesn't Belong", you went wildly off base with the Dash-8. As others have pointed out, the TBM 940 or Epic E1000gx would have made more sense of apples to apples.
We fly a Cessna 441 Conquest II. Our chirp laughs at his friends flying King Air's as he slides past them with a 30 knot speed advantage. He loves those Garrett dash 10s. Make her climb like an angel.
Not a bad list. Very surprised that the TBM 940 is not on it with it's speed of 330 knots.
Its French.
The Piper M600 and the Piaggo Avanti Evo are my top picks. Great presentation.
Excellent choice of aircraft! Thanks for dropping by!
I'll go for Piaggio Evo.Thanks a lot for your time and patience.
Thank you for watching!
The Evo is fine, but good luck with parts support.
i fly the EVO - to what part shortage do you refer ................... have found NO such difficulties
The EVO is my favorite. Great Vid. Thanks
Good choice! Thanks for watching!
Piaggio started with building vespa scooters from WW2 aircraft scratch , finished by building the most efficient aircraft .
they haven't finished, lol
Interesting. I am surprised the EPIC wasn't there too. The Piaggio is fabulous, and I also liked the Piper M600.
Dropping two of the best Turboprops just doesn't feel right and destroys credibility. They are both two of the fastest single engine Turboprops
When you first hear a P-190 in the sky, your head will snap up to find it. When you see it, your mouth will drop. It is the most distinctive aircraft, period ! There was a company that brought a fleet into the San Francisco airports: San Carlos for SFO, Oakland, and San Jose.
Suddenly, they stopped flying. I sure miss watching them!
The Avanti will be on my list, after the winning PowerBall ticket.
I'm a retired Navy Flyer who was used to cruising at FL400 & 400KIAS in my squadron's Lockheed S-3 Viking aircraft when practicing airways training when back home from deployment at the Naval Air Station. As a new subscriber, I was pleased to watch your Top 5 Private Jets & Top 5 Private Turboprops vids.
As I've been a fan of the Piaggio P.180/EVO Avanti II twin-engine for some time, I was pleased to see it in the #1 position of your private turboprop ratings. I'm also a recent fan of the private Celera 500L single-engine ultra-modern V12 diesel/Jet A pusher, and would love to see these 2 compared.
I suggest in your vids of these private jet & TP aircraft that you pay particular attention to the ranges and maximum cruising altitude/FL of each aircraft as advertised by the manufacturers, as well as the max cruise speed. I'd also like to see the Avanti II & Celera 500L compared to the private jets.
Friends who are airline pilots advise me that the range, max cruise speed & max cruise altitude are not the only important measures of an aircraft. They maintain that the PT-6 in the Avanti II hasn't a good climb performance compared to the jets, gives a very slow time to complete climb out comparatively, thus affecting the range. I assume that this may be a concern for the Celera pusher, as well, but not really sure. Would love to have your perspective on these concerns.
Thanks for some really interesting video!
That's incredible! Appreciate the feedback as well. Thank you so much for sharing!
Good summery but EPIC needs to be in the mix !
The TBN 940 ($4.1 million) is my favorite turbo prop (not listed here). It's the only plane I know that can land by itself without pilot input should the pilot become incapacitated.
The Mooney M600 can also auto-land. It’s a Garmin feature, not a Daher feature. It was put into the M600 prior to the TBM 940.
My toilet seat also can auto land
I believe it’s available on the Piper too?
IMHO, You have a mixed class of turboprops here, and left out the number 1 altogether.. For single engine/1 pilot I would select the TBM 9xx as number 1, Pilatus PC12 number 2, Cessna Denali 3, Piper PA46/M600 4 and maybe the King Air 260 5, although the King Air is a twin and different class. The Dash 8 is a commercial plane with higher capacity that fly's scheduled routes. The Piaggio is a low volume twin of I think higher capacity, although I'm not very familiar with them. But the first 5 are the ones for personal/ business use. Hope that helps. 8) Again, JMHO --gary
You have a point there. Will try to make a narrower list sometime. Thanks for watching!
I fly a piper m600! :D The only disadvantage is that there are no beautiful flight attendants ladies on board!
I fly my toilet and I don't care about ladies
@@edwardvalivonis23 POO!
How can you possibly omit the TBM?? 🥴
Yes my favorite TBM
agreed, even more since I think their ending the King Air production
Probably known maintenance issues...
@@hendersona49 huh??
@@BigSky71 Becsuse of issues with the plane!!! The only TBM I know of keeps having oil leaking issues.
Dear Sophie! Your choices are my dreams.I love the Italian beauty PIAGGIO,it is surely no.1.Best wishes.
Do you think it was right to choose Dash-8, a regional aircraft instead of the TBM series?
The choice between the Dash-8 and the TBM series would depend on the specific mission and requirements. While the Dash-8 is a regional aircraft known for its capacity, the TBM series is renowned for its speed and agility. Do you have a particular mission or context in mind where you think one of these aircraft might be a better fit, or are you interested in comparing them for a specific purpose?
You did excellent
great list. thanks
You're welcome! Did any of the turboprops on the list catch your eye in particular?
Piaggio has lots of room and a fully enclosed lavatory. Man, I would want one.
The Dash 8 seems out of place in this, but the other assessments were very good. We are looking to go to a turboprop and due to the quiet and size of the cabin the Avanti is in our consideration. Maintenance, and support will be the deal breaker, we are still evaluating. Of course the speed and efficiency of the Avanti is unmatched. I used to work these as an Air Traffic Controller (Washington ARTCC) and was amazed at the performance.
Pity l am not a multi millionaire as the Piaggio Avanti would be on my shopping list . Takes the fabulous Italians to design an amazing looking aircraft. Well done . Designed 4 Europe & the Americas. Unfortunately wouldn't get me from Australia to those destinations without a few lay overs . Other than that its perfect 😀👏👏
Evo, just like my helmet, both have striking beauty
I'd like to see Pilatus pick up from where Piaggio left off. the Avanti Evo had a lot to offer, and Pilatus could have worked out the kinks and improved the craftsmanship that Piaggio missed, as well as beefing up parts support.
What specifically do you think was lacking in Piaggio’s craftsmanship? I’ve never heard anyone complain about that before. Plus they are still in production (barely, I’ll admit) so talking like Piaggio is gone is premature.
Avanti EVO for sure!
Love the Paggio, my only problem might be the serviceability in the US.
@@jamesmcpeake3235
Hmmmm......?
Good job, I thought you were spot on.
Appreciate the feedback! Thanks very much!
@Aviation Federation You overstated Piaggio’s range by over 1000nm. Actual range is 1720nm, which would require one stop NY to SF.
love it thankyou
Welcome!
What about the Daher TBM 900 (330kn) and the Epic e1000 (333kN)?
I would definitely put the 940 as one of the top two.
The Evo New York too San Fran none stop at what Speed?
And yes the 940 and Epic , were are they?
Is the Q400 presented in Exec config. If so waht is the range?
Hi there, you forgot the TBM 940
It's realy fast
As an ex Q400 driver I can tell you that you’re 10 knots slow on the Q400. It can do 370 KTAS, although you are riding up a bit close against the speed limit, so yes 360 is what’s usually seen. It’s an amazing aircraft in terms of performance, but awful in turbulence (feels like you’re in a washing machine) and not a well designed aircraft for pilot ergonomics. Bombardier wanted to keep the design commonality with the 100/200/300 in order to maintain a common type rating. A pity, as no one uses it really.
Thank you for sharing! Amazing bit of information for a future update!
@@jamesmcpeake3235 that’s fantastic! Would love to get my hands on one someday. I read somewhere that the P180 is slow in climb though so block times suffer? Standard climb in the Q400 is 210 KIAS but high speed climb of 235 is often used (in both cases reducing at higher altitudes). The Q400 easily overspeeds even on one engine so plenty of attention needs to be paid to power management and it’s slippery as heck, unlike most turboprops. The propellers acting as big drag discs just doesn’t happen due to the blade angle at flight idle essentially creating very little drag. Deceleration for 250KIAS below A100 usually starts at around 12,000 feet or higher if you’re heavy and particularly with tailwind. Anyway enough from me. Thanks for sharing!
You asked what other turbo props would be of interest and I like the Aero Commander 1000/900 twin turbo prop aircraft and its history. It is a great plane to fly and it is fast and reliable. The hardest part of the aircraft is to taxi it.
The Aero Commander 1000/900 is indeed an intriguing twin-turboprop aircraft with a rich history. Its reputation for speed and reliability is well-known. It's interesting to hear that taxiing can be a challenge - any tips or memorable experiences you'd like to share about flying it?
Hi very nice you give me experience thank you so much
My top pick P180 wonder what you will choice
Myth Busted: Turboprops are equally as safe as jet engines. In fact, turboprops and jets both have turbine engines and are virtually the same thing.
What about the Daher TBM 940? Its top cruise speed is 330 kts. This would fit where the Q400 is. Otherwise, it is a well-compiled list.
Thank you! Will update this list soon.
EPIC need a mention.
Great video. Agree with assessment but wonder why ATR 72 not included. Perhaps do another comparison of top performing commercial turbo prop aircraft?
It would be nice to know the Take-off and Landing Distance required!
Also can the Piaggio Evo take off and land on a Non-Finished Runway like the Pilatus 12 & 24 can? 🤔
Best video I ever saw!
Thank you so much!
Nice video, but you should compare at different ways! Single, multi,airline turboprop not all together......that’s my opinion.
In my country there's a PA 42-1000 that cruises around 400 knots
The TBM 940 should have been right up there, the Epic also. I have no idea what the Dash 8-400 was doing on the list, yes its quick but is it relevant in this company?. A highly capable plane that gets overlooked even though it has the measure of much of the King Air range is the Fairchild Merlin 3c carries more further and faster than most, and from the 70,s
In your commentary you say the Piaggio Avanti Evo range is 2759 nautical miles, (you mean kilometres) In your information you get it correct it's range is actually 1490 nautical miles. New York to San Francisco is 2247 nautical miles
I liked the part where you said the -8 400/Q400 had noise reduction. Honestly this is the one aircraft I would not fly in anymore without having my noise cancelling headphones
Off by about 1000 nm on the avanti evo range. They’d prob sell tons of em if they had a 2700 nm range
Yes, sorry about that @B Dash! Missed the mark on that one.
Is the Piaggio Avanti EVO in production, or is the company bust?
It's in production.
I have heard Piaggio Aero is on the market and looking for a buyer.
The piaggio is the rightful winner. Stunning plane.
Absolutely!
Number 1 is so beautiful
Indeed it is!
Is Piaggio still in business?
Any list of fast turboprop planes should have a TBM on it which has a top speed of 380 much faster than the M600
And over one million dollars more in price.
I am puzzled why you did not include or mention the TBM 940.
The range of the Piaggio Avanti Evo you stated had 2700 nm range, I think is incorrect unless this year they improved the range from 1700 sm miles to 2700 nm? I have always liked the Piaggio design.
Thank you for pointing that out! You are correct; the Piaggio Avanti Evo indeed has a range of approximately 1,490 nautical miles (nm), and not 2,700. But it does have the equivalent 2,795 kilometers of range. I appreciate your attention to detail and your fondness for the Piaggio design. Which other turboprops would you like us to feature next?
I like the avanti Evo
Description should include climb rate and cruise ceiling.
@RandyOrdonez Yes, performance characteristics should include climb rate, cruise ceiling, cruise airspeed, range.
assume you're going for still in production aircraft.
We are in complete agreement on the Piaggio. Nothing is close.
Yes we are
Can not believe you did not include the TBM 940 at 330 kts.
The list made perfectly good sense right until #2.
What is the Piaggio's record on reliability and maintenance?
Pilatus Pc -12 😍😍
디자인의 변화로 연료를 절약하는 놀라운 기술들
Yes you miss out the SAAB 2000....
But you say that the PIAGGIO AVANTI P180 EVO flew from NEW YORK TO SAN FRANCISCO 2759 NAUTICAL MILES, BUT WITH HOW MANY PASSENGERS AND CREW AND BAGGAGE???
That's right, I haven't had the chance to look at the SAAB 2000 yet, but would love to feature it in future videos. As for the Piaggio Avanti P180 Evo's flight range, I forgot to mention that it's possible with a single stop at full load since the total distance is 4,139 km. The P180's range is actually 2,795 kilometers and not in nautical miles. Sorry for that oversight! What other features of the P180 stood out to you the most?
The Piaggio most certainly does not have a range of 2,700nm. It does have a range of 1,700nm, requiring one fuel stop to travel between NYC and San Fran.
Also, no TBM?
Poor research on the part of this video's creator.
Thank you! I was looking for someone else to have posted this error before doing it myself. Overstating the Piaggio’s range by over 1000 nm is egregious. Even so, the Piaggio would still be my top choice as well. It is a fabulous aircraft for many reasons. It does need some upgrades to its avionics, needs auto-throttle (P&W’s fault), and external serviceability for the toilet, etc. these may never happen as the company is struggling financially. They need a deep pockets buyer to take over and make these upgrades, possibly switching to an engine company that will give them auto-throttle if P&W won’t (which is too bad because P&W has the reliability). But the Piaggio has the speed, efficiency, passenger space, and range that no other plane in its class has. Nothing else comes close.
My favorite fastest turboprop aircraft is a Daher TBM 940.
Flight fast
SIngle engine
Number one, EPIC E1000 GX
with a top speed of 333 knots, it is not only the fastest but also the fastest rising one, an impressive 4,000 feet per minute, reaching a higher attitude, of 34,000 feet. its range and 1,385 nautical miles flying at 325 knots at 34,000 feet altitude.25 mar. 2021
Number two, Daher TBM 940
This turboprop owes its success to its remarkable performance, as well as to its equipment, unique in the category of single-engine turboprop, such as an auto-throttle which facilitates the automatic pre-adjustment of the speed, during the various phases of flight from the climb. until the approach; an automatic defrost system, and many more.
The specifications of the Daher TBM 940
Maximum cruise speed in long range settings 252 KTAS 467 km / h
Maximum cruising speed at 28,000 ft. 330 KTAS 611 km / h
Climb time to 31,000 ft 18 min. 45 seconds
Certified ceiling of 31,000 ft. 9,449 m.
Takeoff distance 2380 ft. 726 m.
Landing distance of 2,430 feet 741 m.
Number one, EPIC E1000 GX
It is a single engine Turboprops made in the USA, carrying six people. Its manufacturer sells it as the aircraft in its class with access to the largest number of smaller airports. with a top speed of 333 knots, it is not only the fastest but also the fastest rising one, an impressive 4,000 feet per minute, reaching a higher attitude, of 34,000 feet. its range and 1,385 nautical miles flying at 325 knots at 34,000 feet altitude. If von slower, at 265 knots, its range is 1650 nautical miles. Its engine is a 1200 horsepower Pratt & Whitney. Takeoff distance 2254 ft. Landing distance of 2,399 feet. It costs $ 3,850,000.
Twin turbo prop
Mitsubishi MU-2: Addictive performance - AOPA
MU-2 has minimum speeds based on flap ... The short- body Solitaire tops out at 310 knots.
MITSUBISHI MU-2: ADDICTIVE PERFORMANCE
BEST BANG-FOR-THE-BUCK TURBOPROP
high wing loading for both speed and a solid ride through turbulence, and over-built military-style construction with no life limit on the airframe.
MU-2 is a rocket. The short-body airplanes can top out above 300 knots, initially climbing at nearly 3,000 fpm. Best altitudes are 20,000 to 28,000 feet,
accordingly, its handling is transport-like,
Trimmed up, it stays where it’s put and rides through bumps like a steamroller with its 65-lb/sq .ft wing loading. With the spoiler system, there is no adverse yaw.
Twin engine
Aerostar 702: Still The Fastest
Forty years after its introduction, the Aerostar remains the world’s fastest, general aviation piston airplane-period
Thanks for sharing this!
Super … 👏
Thank you! Cheers!
What is the range of the 2nd 3rd and 4th one
You didnt mention fuel efficiency. Some latest airbus jets can deliver 120 mpg per seat fuel efficiency, so how about these turbo props
I think Piaggio
Love somach
Also Piper Cheyenne 400 LS at 351 Kts..404 mph
How can i take ride on 1 ?
Good summery of TP s but Epic needs a mention !
Thanks for comment! Yes, I guess I was just not very familiar with Epic Aircraft yet!
TBM 900 series is obviously omitted. Nice video though
My bad.
The Epic 1000 should be there
Why not including the TBM 940?
the piagio duck is top (saussisse volante fantastique 700km/h :))))))))
Cheyenne 400LS should be on the list.
Why was the Dash 8 in here and the TBM isn't.
The Dash 8 seems to be a little out of place. It’s a regional airliner. The others are more executive. And yeah, the TBM...
I thought the EVO went bangrupt, Well the Company behind it that is?
You're missing the Tu-95... unless you add a word to your title... :-)
Where are the Daher TBM 9xx series ?!
You missed the Epic 3000 as a fast single engined turboprop!
Sorry but King Air should be #2. Great video anyway!
Fair enough. Thanks for watching!
For the money....give me an old Piper Cheyenne 400LS. With a 1000 hp per side...it climbed like a bottle rocket.
Scale up the P.180 to take about 75 passengers and you have a winner if it can be done at a sensible price.
Scaling up the P.180 could be a game-changer for regional flights. What do you think would be the biggest challenge in making it work at a sensible price?
If you are going to have the Q400 on the list..how about the Saab 2000 at 413 mph top speed.
That's actually a great suggestion for another video. Thanks!
Where's the Daher TBM ??
I like it
You missed out the TBM 940 etc