9:17 If Biden follows Jason's prediction, Kamala Harris would essentially be mirroring the script of the HBO series "Veep." Her ambition would compel her to run, potentially leading to a tie in the election. In such a scenario, the deciding vote would be cast by her Vice President, who served during her presidency, ultimately determining the next President of the United States.😂
Dealing with controversy may be as simple as posting "Views expressed on our site are as individual as each of our contributors. Individual viewpoints will vary and may not reflect the view of our staff or editor(s). We encourage free expression. If you see something you find offensive, please skip the article and move on to content you find more agreeable. Please feel free to block any contributor whose postings make you feel uncomfortable. We do not allow calls for violence or harm to another." Provide an email address to report violent content, abusive content, illegal content, etc. Provide a special bookmark for offensive material so an internal scan of bookmarked pages can indicate if an identifier comes up repeatedly. Create a Policy and Procedures eManual listing clearly what is considered violence, abuse, illegality. Gray areas must be reviewed by senior staff, with any additions to the P&P manual inserted, including the notation "Revised day/month/year." Offenders who are banned for violent or abusive content will be provided a documented history of their prior warnings via email or standard post, including the reasons as defined in the P&P eManual, Section, Page, Paragraph.
This is intellectually boring. Bringing on two people who agree... Or at least are afraid to say what's true and willing to self censor... Living under fascism is such a buzz kill. You're afraid to say what you mean... You're too out of touch to even understand the data. An article saying fuck all the way off... How courageous in silicon valley 🤣🤮 If they aren't talking about the data... Which I haven't read it yet... But it's written by leftist so I'm pretty sure they won't.......... Bring on a libertarian or a republican when talking about DEI. Have a view that most in California have never heard before
@@arielquelme echo chambers are boring. Why even bother having two people say the same thing... Just takes more time. I prefer people to be honest when discussing politics. You'll never get that with two Democrats unfortunately. They admit on the video that they are afraid of saying what they really feel.... Self censorship occurs under authoritarian regimes... You we all know who they are scared of... And it isn't Trump I like Jason. He's smart when politics isn't involved lol It'd be great to have him wake up to the fact he's been lied to
If you make things meritocratic some groups will be more successful than other - and often not the ones you think too. We need to be ok with the fact that some groups will do better, since it makes society more productive overall & benefits everyone. The same reason you should not resent rich people if they make value for everyone. I'd focus on finding places which are not meritocratic and making them more so. Not for moral sense - but because you'll have a more efficient society which benefits everyone. Maybe sounds cold and is a hard sell, but my two cents.
Its wild how he still will vote Biden after he just showed his lack of life left. The dude isnt there, if anything just undervote or go 3rd party. People like that vote for the party are the reason we only have 2 viable parties.
![How to Get a Developer Job - Even in This Economy [Full Course]](/img/1.gif)
9:17 If Biden follows Jason's prediction, Kamala Harris would essentially be mirroring the script of the HBO series "Veep." Her ambition would compel her to run, potentially leading to a tie in the election. In such a scenario, the deciding vote would be cast by her Vice President, who served during her presidency, ultimately determining the next President of the United States.😂
Alex needs to chill with his TDS. Be more fair and real. Cmon dude.
Alex defending discrimination. I suggest he reads The Civil Rights Act of 1964.
"Oh, pay for views as advertisements, cool, that's just brilliant."
Dealing with controversy may be as simple as posting "Views expressed on our site are as individual as each of our contributors. Individual viewpoints will vary and may not reflect the view of our staff or editor(s). We encourage free expression. If you see something you find offensive, please skip the article and move on to content you find more agreeable. Please feel free to block any contributor whose postings make you feel uncomfortable. We do not allow calls for violence or harm to another." Provide an email address to report violent content, abusive content, illegal content, etc. Provide a special bookmark for offensive material so an internal scan of bookmarked pages can indicate if an identifier comes up repeatedly. Create a Policy and Procedures eManual listing clearly what is considered violence, abuse, illegality. Gray areas must be reviewed by senior staff, with any additions to the P&P manual inserted, including the notation "Revised day/month/year." Offenders who are banned for violent or abusive content will be provided a documented history of their prior warnings via email or standard post, including the reasons as defined in the P&P eManual, Section, Page, Paragraph.
Just a little bit of right leaning backlash and you guys flip out. It really speaks to how left leaning you and your environment actually is
The virtue signalling is strong in this one.
Sir there is a need of your videos should be edited good and the most important thing thumbnail so you want then let me know
This is intellectually boring. Bringing on two people who agree... Or at least are afraid to say what's true and willing to self censor...
Living under fascism is such a buzz kill.
You're afraid to say what you mean... You're too out of touch to even understand the data.
An article saying fuck all the way off... How courageous in silicon valley 🤣🤮
If they aren't talking about the data... Which I haven't read it yet... But it's written by leftist so I'm pretty sure they won't..........
Bring on a libertarian or a republican when talking about DEI. Have a view that most in California have never heard before
So this is not debate, but echo chamber
@@arielquelme echo chambers are boring. Why even bother having two people say the same thing... Just takes more time. I prefer people to be honest when discussing politics.
You'll never get that with two Democrats unfortunately. They admit on the video that they are afraid of saying what they really feel.... Self censorship occurs under authoritarian regimes... You we all know who they are scared of... And it isn't Trump
I like Jason. He's smart when politics isn't involved lol
It'd be great to have him wake up to the fact he's been lied to
If you make things meritocratic some groups will be more successful than other - and often not the ones you think too.
We need to be ok with the fact that some groups will do better, since it makes society more productive overall & benefits everyone. The same reason you should not resent rich people if they make value for everyone.
I'd focus on finding places which are not meritocratic and making them more so. Not for moral sense - but because you'll have a more efficient society which benefits everyone.
Maybe sounds cold and is a hard sell, but my two cents.
I'm voting for Biden because he believes in separation of church and state, alrighty then!
Why are regular citizens so bound to a political party?
he has BLM on his twitter profile lmao
A lot of white guilt there. 😆
Its wild how he still will vote Biden after he just showed his lack of life left. The dude isnt there, if anything just undervote or go 3rd party. People like that vote for the party are the reason we only have 2 viable parties.