Statistical degrees of freedom - What are they REALLY?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 авг 2024
  • When degrees of freedom are introduced in intro stats classes, students often get confused. However, there is a quite easy way to understand them using the geometry behind statistics. This video builds upon an earlier video about variance estimation, but it is not necessary to have watched it:
    • Variance: Why n-1? Int...
    Timeline:
    0:55 Usual explanation
    3:24 Introduction to geometry of statistics
    6:02 Data partition into mean and residual vectors
    8:48 Degrees of freedom as possible vector movement
    13:30 Differences due to sample mean vs. population mean
    15:37 Residuals vector and variance
    17:38 Why underestimation can be compensated by "sample size reduction"

Комментарии • 17

  • @statsandscience
    @statsandscience  11 месяцев назад +6

    I made a quite bad mistake around 10:46 onwards (written and spoken) - it is of course the dot product that is the relevant concept here, not the cross product. I am sorry if that caused confusion, I added some links to videos explaining dot products together with a correction text and I hope that helps... thanks @a.r.k.2734 to point that out in the comments.

  • @user-nz4es4gd4b
    @user-nz4es4gd4b 10 месяцев назад +3

    thanks for making it harder than it was

  • @knmrt2760
    @knmrt2760 Год назад +3

    That was very interesting, I've studied maths and some statistics but I've never quite understood the concept behind degrees of freedom I always took them for granted and used them as advised to make my formulas work etc...

  • @dan0_0nad76
    @dan0_0nad76 3 месяца назад

    This video helped a lot, thank you for providing such intuitive animations❤❤

  • @benjaminp.vallieres4281
    @benjaminp.vallieres4281 Год назад +4

    I don't understand this, but I feel like I have to if I ever want to understand those ***** degrees of freedom.

    • @statsandscience
      @statsandscience  11 месяцев назад

      Thanks for your comment, feel free to ask something!

  • @JohannaSchulz-nu5pu
    @JohannaSchulz-nu5pu Год назад +1

    Finally a new video from you!! 👍

  • @kyledagman
    @kyledagman 4 месяца назад

    This is a really great explanation of the geometric interpretation of degrees of freedom with random vectors. You covered basically the same ground as the "Of random vectors" section of the Degrees of Freedom Wikipedia article, but your visualizations really helped me to understand better. Thank you so much for the great presentation!
    I will need to do more research on how this interpretation makes sense when looking at things other than the unbiased estimator of population variance, such as for the Chi-Square and Student's t Distributions. Does this interpretation also work in those contexts?

  • @a.r.k.2734
    @a.r.k.2734 Год назад +1

    This is a really cool way to look at degrees of freedom in stats! Thank you for sharing. I believe you misspoke around 11:30 when you said the cross product is zero when two vectors are perpendicular; it's the dot product that's zero when two vectors are perpendicular.

    • @statsandscience
      @statsandscience  Год назад

      Wow, what a hiccup...! You are right of course. Thanks for pointing that out and for the nice comment!

  • @roncastel3627
    @roncastel3627 7 месяцев назад

    Awesome, nice work

  • @idlesummer2918
    @idlesummer2918 2 месяца назад

    hi! this video was greatly insightful. i do get where the divisor n-1 is coming from both geometrically (as the projection of a vector) and how it was derived mathematically. but im still confused as to how the degrees of freedom and the sum of squared deviations of the sample are related from this geometric perspective.

  • @davecorry7723
    @davecorry7723 11 месяцев назад

    1:42 "Suppose you have only one data point, let's say 2. Then someone else tells you they added a second value but don't tell you which number exactly ... So the degrees of freedom for those two numbers is 2." But why isn't it 1? Because 2 is *not* free to vary: it's the unvarying number 2.

  • @siddharthgurav6407
    @siddharthgurav6407 6 месяцев назад

    Please make P-value video

  • @elenamascarenas9317
    @elenamascarenas9317 9 месяцев назад

    what do you mean by "the residuals vector needs to lie on a single line"?

    • @statsandscience
      @statsandscience  9 месяцев назад

      That just means that regardless of your actual data, the vector of residuals will be located on the same line. the lengths might differ, so they might be closer to zero or further out depending on your data, but the direction will be the same.