Thanks Dave, you made my day. It took me two complete days to make this one. The first time I recorded it in a hotel room in Newfoundland and messed it up.
Great video. Do you think you could do one further explaining workmanship and fracture mechanics? Or at the very least, when and who decides which to use?
Hi paul,hope you doing well!if you not mind,by using conventional UT flaw scanning,any technique we can use beside of manual plotting to categories the flaw as a planar defect such on ISO etc.? probably the different db on each angle probe used...tq....
9712 only applies to the certification and qualification standards for NDT Personnel. It doesn't have any method-specific inspection requirements or criteria outside of becoming certified.
Thank you so much Paul... Could you please make a similar I formative video for AWS D1.1 FOR tubular section. Especially for pipes having dia less then 400mm and having a long seam weld and a circumferential weld. D1.1 doesn't have a simple table like it has for non- tubular section although it has some charts for acceptance criteria.... I don't get them properly... Please help. Thank you.
If you aren't sure which table to use, I'll generally ask customers for the WPS for whatever welds I'm inspecting. It will tell you the accept/reject table in the NDE section. Hope that helps!
@@weslecoffman8533 they didn't had anything like that. In there WPS things were available only for non tubular... They didn't even had a WPS for tubular section... Because those sections were customised, those weld joints were not supposed to be there according to drawing. And they were not supposed to be welded on site. Except only errection joints. But it's ohk.... Now I am not working in that project anymore, its already completed. Thank you for writing to me 🙏 i really appreciate it. 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙏.
That was explained so clearly, precisely and quickly. Well done. Deserves more that a like. 👍
Thanks Dave, you made my day. It took me two complete days to make this one. The first time I recorded it in a hotel room in Newfoundland and messed it up.
Another awesome video. Your 'Steer clear" quote was funny too. Thank you, Jim.
you are just phenomenal sir,awesome teaching
Great video Paul!
Hi Paul thanks, very usesfull
Thanks for video 🙏 From Borneo Sarawak.
Great Paul thank you could you, please do the same Video ISO 13588 and ISO 19285
Great video. Do you think you could do one further explaining workmanship and fracture mechanics? Or at the very least, when and who decides which to use?
Oh yeah, that one's on the list
Hi paul,hope you doing well!if you not mind,by using conventional UT flaw scanning,any technique we can use beside of manual plotting to categories the flaw as a planar defect such on ISO etc.? probably the different db on each angle probe used...tq....
Hello sir please make videos on European standard EN 9712 for ut and mt
He is a canadian
9712 only applies to the certification and qualification standards for NDT Personnel. It doesn't have any method-specific inspection requirements or criteria outside of becoming certified.
Thank you so much Paul...
Could you please make a similar I formative video for AWS D1.1 FOR tubular section. Especially for pipes having dia less then 400mm and having a long seam weld and a circumferential weld.
D1.1 doesn't have a simple table like it has for non- tubular section although it has some charts for acceptance criteria.... I don't get them properly... Please help.
Thank you.
In Canada we use CSA W59 which has now deviated from AWS. Perhaps someday I'll make an AWS video, or they'll update the code and I won't have to.
If you aren't sure which table to use, I'll generally ask customers for the WPS for whatever welds I'm inspecting. It will tell you the accept/reject table in the NDE section. Hope that helps!
@@weslecoffman8533 they didn't had anything like that. In there WPS things were available only for non tubular... They didn't even had a WPS for tubular section... Because those sections were customised, those weld joints were not supposed to be there according to drawing. And they were not supposed to be welded on site. Except only errection joints.
But it's ohk.... Now I am not working in that project anymore, its already completed.
Thank you for writing to me 🙏 i really appreciate it. 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙏.
Hello sir I'm kabilraj from India for my question future of ndt engineers good or bad.. ?