Corrosion Inspection on Noisy Steel

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 дек 2024

Комментарии • 19

  • @monkey16384
    @monkey16384 8 месяцев назад +2

    The Ghost shirt you wore really helped me absorb the subject material Paul!! Folks in the trades have GREAT taste in music. Seriously, thank for the clear comparison of transducer size vs. probability of detection. As a soon to be UT2, this is a valuable lesson!

    • @hollowayndtengineeringinc.5201
      @hollowayndtengineeringinc.5201  8 месяцев назад +2

      I wanted to lower the table and show Papa Emeritus' full headshot, but the lights on my table move with it. Oh well, if you know Ghost, you know what he looks like. Awesome band live too!

  • @ndthero
    @ndthero 8 месяцев назад +1

    Fine job sir. Breaking down the sensitivity aspect between these transducers as it relates to corrosion and similar style indications is well done.

  • @rubiselcuba
    @rubiselcuba 8 месяцев назад +2

    Great video, Paul, as usual.

  • @simon-pierrelussier2775
    @simon-pierrelussier2775 8 месяцев назад +2

    IDK what I did to get this video suggested by youtube's algo, but I like it!

  • @Cluni-80s
    @Cluni-80s 8 месяцев назад +1

    I remember we faced a lot of noise while mapping the corrosion on tanks using Silverwing's Scorpion 2. If I am not mistaken, the Excel macro report generator they provided had a high/low filter that kept everything tidy. It was ages ago, so I am a bit fuzzy on the details, it might not be related to the video.
    Paul, you are the gift that keeps giving, as always, thank you for the valuable insights.

  • @fishindude6799
    @fishindude6799 7 месяцев назад +1

    Could you do a video on erw longitudial seams.

  • @dinho9492
    @dinho9492 8 месяцев назад +1

    Thanks🙏 From Borneo ( Sarawak )

  • @uw0538
    @uw0538 5 месяцев назад +1

    thank you for this videos ,there is a way to inspect corrosion without the contact with the material ??

    • @hollowayndtengineeringinc.5201
      @hollowayndtengineeringinc.5201  5 месяцев назад +1

      You could use low frequency eddy current, but it's more of a screening tool.

    • @uw0538
      @uw0538 5 месяцев назад

      @@hollowayndtengineeringinc.5201 do you have some documentation or example of that.thanks

  • @UTEXScientific
    @UTEXScientific 8 месяцев назад +1

    Thank you Paul!

  • @forbido
    @forbido 8 месяцев назад +1

    Great video

  • @TheKajunkat
    @TheKajunkat 8 месяцев назад

    I would assume that almost all of the plate defects should show up at approximately half the nominal thickness.

    • @hollowayndtengineeringinc.5201
      @hollowayndtengineeringinc.5201  8 месяцев назад +1

      Sometimes yes, sometimes no. If you see the macro image, they could be anywhere. For laminations, yes... they're usually "big sheet" reflectors about half way thru

    • @TheKajunkat
      @TheKajunkat 8 месяцев назад

      @@hollowayndtengineeringinc.5201 is there a way to tell the difference in laminations and hydrogen blisters or hac?

  • @santiagocruz9060
    @santiagocruz9060 8 месяцев назад

    In this case we asume HIC defect?

    • @hollowayndtengineeringinc.5201
      @hollowayndtengineeringinc.5201  8 месяцев назад +1

      Definitely not. If HIC is suspected for the service of the equipment, then an appropriate inspection technique should be applied. In this case, it's just noisy hot rolled steel.