The only plugin alliance channel strip I'd love to see in the future is one done similarly to Scheps omni with modules that can be reordered and inserts for other plugins. I think it would also be sweet to be able to combine different modules from their different consoles into one plugin like an 80s series pre with a SSL eq and a 50 series comp then put a SPL transient designer or DeEsser in the inserts.
@@tomw1970 The NoiseAsh Prestige Racks is really amazing, and I use it all the time . . . it's only $29 and it is very useful and versatile . . . ! . . . The Medley EQ has a Rule Tec Bass section, two API style bands in the middle, and Need (Neve) style High Band, and a Sky Band (like Maag's 40k band) . . . And I Still use my Lindell 80. 50, and 69, all of the time . . . ! . . . Yet if You want the Ultimate Swiss Army Knife of EQs . . . The Kirchhoff EQ is Amazing . . . with 32 Bands that can be switched individually to bands with curves and Tonal Character, modelled after Pultec, "British N" (Neve), SSL E&G, "Tone Stack", "250" (Amek?), and Blue (Maag) . . . And . . . Their Own curves and filters are Fantastic . . . And it is Included in the PA Mega Bundle subscription . . . ! . . . 🙂 (-;
@SingularityMedia . . . Yet . . . I keep Grabbing for the Lindell 69, 80, and 50 . . .Somewhere in almost every mix . . . Because of how well they work on my Drums and Percussion tracks . . . And that is Why I am here . . . to get more insight into this amazing tool, that I just keep Grabbing for . . . ! . . . & . . . ! will likely be adding the UAD Helios type 69, So my Lindell Channel 69 will have a Kindred Buddy to hang out with . . . ! . . . Just like how my Lindell Chanell 80 Loves hanging out with the Need Pre Trilogy, and the Need Console 84 . . . !?@y@?! . . . . . . And The Kirchhoff EQ and the Cenezoix Compesser , are about as innovative as it gets . . . ! . . . 🙂 (-;
I really liked this thing. All the Channel Strips have functions I don't like and when that happens I just add other plugins to complement. But I think the Eq, THD and compression are really cool! Great Review! Cheers!
A note on the low end boost: Tobias Lindell excluded it purposefully so there wouldn't be a boost every time it's added to a track. You can bring this back by adding 2.5 dB to the low end and saving it as the default preset.
Thanks I . . . I Love the Lindell 69, 80, & 50 . . . And I am demoing the UAD Helios style 69, and it made me wonder about these things . . . and You just answered my questions . . . in addition to the video mentioning that Attenuation switch adds Resonance of the Frequency you set Filter too . . . And I Noticed the 80 Cycle Resonance when I switch to 80 . . . So, it is nice to have that confirmed, as well . . . ! . . . 🙂 (-;
@@whitenoisestudio i mean i am doing mostly real instrument recording kinda tracks most of the time (edit: peoples mileage may vary). Anywho... horses for courses i suppose.
I haven’t used this plug-in, but the curves on the eq kept me reaching for the waves version back when I used their plugins. Was a constant go-to for guitars.
Wow, another channel strip. Been waiting my whole life to add one more this to my 40 other channel strips collection. So i can forget about it and continue using ProQ3 and Pro C2 like i do everyday
it cost me 30 bucks because i still have forever 29 and to be honest its nice to have a helos native. UAD has yet to port the one they make. I do love the eq but totally agree with all your points. the output gain is clean the eq can crunch easily and the bus section is dumb lol
A lot of people are bored by analog emulations - I am able to get excited about analog emulations, when they either push analog modeling technology forward, or emulate new products. I dont know of another manufacturer (outside of perhaps UAD) who have modelled this compressor specifically. We are a long way off from perfectly emulating some analog devices, anything that pushes us closer to that goal is interesting to me (though Brainworx don't comment too much on this particular objective - they just make their products). All of that being said, this sounds very good - wish they would have maintained the integrity of the circuit in their emulation with regard to the low band....who really knows how extensively devs try and "model". Sadly, these days - I think a lot of them slap a fancy GUI on a set of old algorithms, add a little saturation and a default .5dB volume boost when instantiated, and call it a day....not saying that is happening here, but analog emulation is a can of worms
Hahah, that 0,5 dB of gain at the output is absolutely a thing. For me it's a bit scammy since you can easily be fooled that it sound better because of that. By th eway, this plugin is coded by LSR, not brainworx. Waves Kramer HLS channel ( HeLioS) is also based on this type of console, the one from the rolling stones recording truck specifically if i recall correctly.
@@whitenoisestudio Yes thats true - Lindell are pretty good usually. And I do find the Waves version very useable. They’re unbelievably hit and miss but they do have some good emulations- that and the PIE compressor are fabulous. I’m sort of waiting for the next big innovation in modeling technology to come through. Acustica are getting close with their newer products specifically (like straw). That one is absolutely incredible and may be basically 1:1 for all I know. Hopefully we dont have to wait for quantum computing for this to happen, and then I can finally sell my hardware.
Acustica is usually great. My complaints aboit them are that often the guis are cramped, their product naming is confusing as hell for an old man like me and I can't keep up with their release schedule ;-)
But the thing about the Plugin-Alliance SSL strips is that they make the E, the G, and the J. And each letter brings you closer and closer to Z, and of course Z stands for impedance, and impedance is a big part of audio engineering, which is how this Helios channel was created - with engineering. So that you don’t have to be the engineer. You can take a break and rest and let someone else be the engineer who steers the train. This way you’re not always training and overloading your brain, so your brain can breathe and work properly. Your brain will work, so you see it is called “Brainworx” for your brain and my brain and all of us working. Alright!! 😎👍👍
Great review! I like the AMEK 9099 as far as channel strips from Plugin Alliance, and the Lindell 50 and 80 Series work well. I usually turn off the TMT features because I don't think the differences add up in the end. Lately, I've been using Eventide's UltraChannel, which is ancient in comparison, but it has pretty much everything you would need without all the fancy modeling stuff.
Vintage plugin! If yoiu already plan to use TMT , you should enable it right at the start and never touch it again later in the mix. It can throw off your setting too much.
TMT is nothing but a marketing gag. Your perception is absolutely correct. The thing is - and most people do overlook that - most of the time there is a whole different signal on each channel. Which means you wouldn't notice any interaction with the channel right next to it. If you have let's say a synth lead on channel 5 and a bass guitar on channel 4 your mix doesn't get miraculously wider or "deeper" just because the synth channel high shelf starts at 10,1KHz instead of 9.98 KHz. That just isn't the case. It simply doesn't matter. That is the reason why the audio inddustry didn't care to eliminate those little differences, because they just don't have any major impact. The only situation, where such tiny differences do matter is when you have (almost) the same signal in two channels. Only then you would hear slight phase-related and amplitude-related effects but they would be so subtle that it would get lost in a full mix anyway. The main effect of making things wider comes from placing your stereo mics or ERs. The technical differences are way more crucial than any difference caused by TMT could ever be. And before anyone comes up with "He doesn't know what he's talking about": I've been an mixing engineer for 23 years, been mixing on a 48channel Neve VR Legend. There is one thing that hasn't been modelled yet - that is the bleeding of loud signals onto the next channel of a console. I believe this would have way more effect on a mix than TMT have ever had.
I feel we have reached the end of the road with these type of plugins. Now all that's left is an EQ that looks like Fab Filter with the analog sound of Acustica Audio. But again, people are still better off with something as simple as SlickEQ. Reverbs are an exception because they can still scale more in 'realism' and 'other worldly beauty'
Really good point though....Do we really need more of these? They're not really the hardware. They go for this hardware replacement dream thing.... We don't need that. We have so many of the warming etc available already. We can get the curves that don't good and The compression styles that work..... We know the general things we want in a mix. I say develop more new innovative pligins. Plugins that aren't pretending that they're not digital and take advantages of what's possible to do as a plugin.
Yeah I don't know. I don't mind channelstrip plugins, but for me, hardware is still more grabby which hasn't been emulated yet in channelstrips. Some more specific plugins have managed that already.
@@whitenoisestudio I don't dislike them or anything..It's the do we need more that are basically trying to emulate the specific board, question? And not doing much that the mixer couldn't do.... When it's a plugin. Doesn't need to have the same limitations
Good run-through, as always. You didn't seem to 'bash' it all, lol. I was expecting worse, as I rather like the 'sound'. There don't seem to be any videos of the hardware anywhere, which seems really odd. Any idea why Marlon?
Thanks! There are only 20 of that mixing desk around anymore, and my guess is they might not all be in the best shape. Still no excuse to have it not on video ofcourse ;-)
Since I discovered Acustica Audio a few years ago, non of this stuff can really tickle my fancy anymore. Only Fabfilter, TDR and a handful of other brands I will still use....
Acustica really does some great plugins, only their Guis are often very cramped. And I cannot keep up with their release schedule. It's also a bit weird when you get a plugin, in 3 weeks they will have the new greatest ever. I'm just afraid they go too hard right now and that somewhere it will break down..
@@whitenoisestudio heel eerlijk. Dat dacht ik ook. Echter, Ocean en Straw zijn van een ander kaliber. Verder is Frost, Pensado2 EQ en Magic Flow te gek. Maar ben het met je eens. Wat moet ik nu met al hun andere plugins lol. Die hypermode is wel echt waanzinnig.
The “fader” transformer that is totally transparent is a bit of joke (if it is actually true). Although, boosting the EQ into a saturated input gain is how most channel of a desk react. It actually is very similar on an SSL desk for example. A thing that I haven’t noticed at all with PA SSL channelstrips and that only UAD emulated properly (to my despair). So it’s def not something wrong here. I don’t know if you worked on analog desk long enough, but if you did you’d have maybe noticed that. As much as PluginDoctor reviews are super useful and I thank you for doing so! I think it is important to have enough experience with the original piece to review a plugin that emulates it and be able to know what is to be expected from it. Otherwise it’s almost like tasting chicken flavored crisps without having tasted chicken in your life before. And saying in a review online "These crisps have a weird taste, not like all the others, that's weird.". No it's not, it's how they are supposed to taste, if yall see what I mean :).
You can easily abuse plugin doctor, but it can be ok to show what is happening. i disagree with your statement about having used the original hardware. You can judge a plugin on it's own merits and come to a conclusion.
In a way but I might have not been clear enough about that point maybe. Let me rephrase : When you talk about it saturating when pushing the EQ it’s actually a normal behavior. It’d be like analyzing a Pultec plugin and say “Damn be careful it adds harmonics” if you see what I mean. By knowing the hardware well, these types of “fake surprises” could be avoided. Obviously everybody can have an opinion about anything, as it comes down to taste. But saying that something is a bit odd whereas it is expected is another thing. If you see what I mean? No offense at all intended by the way, I am no hater (and no snob too despite maybe how my first comment maybe sounded haha).
Haha no problem and I see where you come from. On that specific part, I included that because I know most users and viewers are not familiar with how easily a console like this can be pushed into saturation like that. On other emulations it's not always this easy ;-)
@@whitenoisestudio Yes that makes sense. On other channel emu it might actually not really be possible, as not all of them emulated that part of the circuit (unfortunately haha).
boosts of eq are really smooth; similar to la2a compressor,...you hardly destroy the sound; for the bus thing you mentioned,....look at robert babicz tutorial when he inserted plugin on every track without applied any settings....and then he did a/b ...it's really nice sounding....so 69 is the same,....i wonder why you didn't test and comment on that ?
I haven't seen anyone put your on every channel and AB. This is the best demonstration I've seen so far. Plugin alliance boosted so much. Not even pretending to level match...... ridiculous. Lindell has good oversimply right? It's been a while I think I remember that they do. And a lot of brainworks plugins don't. At least not nearly enough internally to cover aliasing with any kind of drive at all. Maybe they've gotten better recently.
@@whitenoisestudio I'm sorry, but your videos from the past hunt you to be in ❤️ with Waves Audio 😆. In all the forums I go to, anyone discussing your channel always brings up your attachment to Waves Audio. I guess it's a stigma that you'll have a hard time getting rid of if you have changed your ❤️ about your stance with Waves Audio. I was just pulling your leg on your title topic.
All good! Nah man, I am not trying to get rid of any stigma whatsoever. I don't care about that. When I am the first one to release a video when I say Waves made a huge mistake doesnt help, then nothing will. Waves is always the number 1 plugin company for everyone to trash, justified or not. it's very fashionable to be against Waves. I found it to be very dissapointing to see all those Waves bashing videos after Waves' stupid subscription plans, when I knew frsthand I was the only one (!!) who actually told Wvaes directly it was a stupid idea. Such trendhoppers. I approach their plugins unbiased and honestly basically every time their plugins are simply well designed with no flaws. I couldnt be arsed to review their latest amp sims, they did nothing for me either positively or negatively.
SSL4000E vs G vs 9000J: ruclips.net/video/7vdQYssq8bo/видео.html
Yo have to test this thing on a rock track. Thats were this consolo shines
110% agree.
Yeah, I find it really hard to get excited about these kinds of plugins now. I don`t need more console emulations. We need more innovative stuff.
A bit like that yeah.
Exactly
The only plugin alliance channel strip I'd love to see in the future is one done similarly to Scheps omni with modules that can be reordered and inserts for other plugins. I think it would also be sweet to be able to combine different modules from their different consoles into one plugin like an 80s series pre with a SSL eq and a 50 series comp then put a SPL transient designer or DeEsser in the inserts.
@@tomw1970
The NoiseAsh Prestige Racks is really amazing, and I use it all the time . . . it's only $29 and it is very useful and versatile . . . ! . . . The Medley EQ has a Rule Tec Bass section, two API style bands in the middle, and Need (Neve) style High Band, and a Sky Band (like Maag's 40k band) . . . And I Still use my Lindell 80. 50, and 69, all of the time . . . !
. . . Yet if You want the Ultimate Swiss Army Knife of EQs . . . The Kirchhoff EQ is Amazing . . . with 32 Bands that can be switched individually to bands with curves and Tonal Character, modelled after Pultec, "British N" (Neve), SSL E&G, "Tone Stack", "250" (Amek?), and Blue (Maag) . . . And . . . Their Own curves and filters are Fantastic . . . And it is Included in the PA Mega Bundle subscription . . . ! . . . 🙂
(-;
@SingularityMedia
. . . Yet . . . I keep Grabbing for the Lindell 69, 80, and 50 . . .Somewhere in almost every mix . . . Because of how well they work on my Drums and Percussion tracks . . . And that is Why I am here . . . to get more insight into this amazing tool, that I just keep Grabbing for . . . ! . . . & . . . ! will likely be adding the UAD Helios type 69, So my Lindell Channel 69 will have a Kindred Buddy to hang out with . . . ! . . . Just like how my Lindell Chanell 80 Loves hanging out with the Need Pre Trilogy, and the Need Console 84 . . . !?@y@?! . . .
. . . And The Kirchhoff EQ and the Cenezoix Compesser , are about as innovative as it gets . . . ! . . . 🙂
(-;
I really liked this thing. All the Channel Strips have functions I don't like and when that happens I just add other plugins to complement. But I think the Eq, THD and compression are really cool! Great Review! Cheers!
Great sound! I don't care what's under the hood.
A note on the low end boost: Tobias Lindell excluded it purposefully so there wouldn't be a boost every time it's added to a track. You can bring this back by adding 2.5 dB to the low end and saving it as the default preset.
Yep. He mentioned that in the gearspace thread right?
@@whitenoisestudio Yep!
Thanks I
. . . I Love the Lindell 69, 80, & 50 . . . And I am demoing the UAD Helios style 69, and it made me wonder about these things . . . and You just answered my questions . . . in addition to the video mentioning that Attenuation switch adds Resonance of the Frequency you set Filter too . . . And I Noticed the 80 Cycle Resonance when I switch to 80 . . . So, it is nice to have that confirmed, as well . . . ! . . . 🙂
(-;
Tbh... this is my favourite lindell channel strip. It sounds great.
Sure thing! If this plugin is great for you, excellent!
@@whitenoisestudio i mean i am doing mostly real instrument recording kinda tracks most of the time (edit: peoples mileage may vary). Anywho... horses for courses i suppose.
I haven’t used this plug-in, but the curves on the eq kept me reaching for the waves version back when I used their plugins. Was a constant go-to for guitars.
It's so broad it probably sounds good ;-)
Wow, another channel strip. Been waiting my whole life to add one more this to my 40 other channel strips collection. So i can forget about it and continue using ProQ3 and Pro C2 like i do everyday
it cost me 30 bucks because i still have forever 29 and to be honest its nice to have a helos native. UAD has yet to port the one they make.
I do love the eq but totally agree with all your points. the output gain is clean the eq can crunch easily and the bus section is dumb lol
''the output gain is clean the eq can crunch easily and the bus section is dumb''.
Man I could have made the video 5 seconds long! Great summary ;-)
A lot of people are bored by analog emulations - I am able to get excited about analog emulations, when they either push analog modeling technology forward, or emulate new products. I dont know of another manufacturer (outside of perhaps UAD) who have modelled this compressor specifically. We are a long way off from perfectly emulating some analog devices, anything that pushes us closer to that goal is interesting to me (though Brainworx don't comment too much on this particular objective - they just make their products).
All of that being said, this sounds very good - wish they would have maintained the integrity of the circuit in their emulation with regard to the low band....who really knows how extensively devs try and "model". Sadly, these days - I think a lot of them slap a fancy GUI on a set of old algorithms, add a little saturation and a default .5dB volume boost when instantiated, and call it a day....not saying that is happening here, but analog emulation is a can of worms
Hahah, that 0,5 dB of gain at the output is absolutely a thing. For me it's a bit scammy since you can easily be fooled that it sound better because of that.
By th eway, this plugin is coded by LSR, not brainworx. Waves Kramer HLS channel ( HeLioS) is also based on this type of console, the one from the rolling stones recording truck specifically if i recall correctly.
@@whitenoisestudio Yes thats true - Lindell are pretty good usually. And I do find the Waves version very useable. They’re unbelievably hit and miss but they do have some good emulations- that and the PIE compressor are fabulous.
I’m sort of waiting for the next big innovation in modeling technology to come through. Acustica are getting close with their newer products specifically (like straw). That one is absolutely incredible and may be basically 1:1 for all I know. Hopefully we dont have to wait for quantum computing for this to happen, and then I can finally sell my hardware.
Acustica is usually great. My complaints aboit them are that often the guis are cramped, their product naming is confusing as hell for an old man like me and I can't keep up with their release schedule ;-)
But the thing about the Plugin-Alliance SSL strips is that they make the E, the G, and the J.
And each letter brings you closer and closer to Z, and of course Z stands for impedance, and impedance is a big part of audio engineering, which is how this Helios channel was created - with engineering.
So that you don’t have to be the engineer. You can take a break and rest and let someone else be the engineer who steers the train. This way you’re not always training and overloading your brain, so your brain can breathe and work properly. Your brain will work, so you see it is called “Brainworx” for your brain and my brain and all of us working.
Alright!! 😎👍👍
I must admit that my brain stopped worxing somewhere halfway through reading this. I need an engineer to fix me ^^
@@whitenoisestudio - Ahh… my hard working is paying off much goodly! Alright! 😄👍
Great review! I like the AMEK 9099 as far as channel strips from Plugin Alliance, and the Lindell 50 and 80 Series work well. I usually turn off the TMT features because I don't think the differences add up in the end. Lately, I've been using Eventide's UltraChannel, which is ancient in comparison, but it has pretty much everything you would need without all the fancy modeling stuff.
Vintage plugin! If yoiu already plan to use TMT , you should enable it right at the start and never touch it again later in the mix. It can throw off your setting too much.
TMT is nothing but a marketing gag. Your perception is absolutely correct. The thing is - and most people do overlook that - most of the time there is a whole different signal on each channel. Which means you wouldn't notice any interaction with the channel right next to it. If you have let's say a synth lead on channel 5 and a bass guitar on channel 4 your mix doesn't get miraculously wider or "deeper" just because the synth channel high shelf starts at 10,1KHz instead of 9.98 KHz. That just isn't the case. It simply doesn't matter. That is the reason why the audio inddustry didn't care to eliminate those little differences, because they just don't have any major impact.
The only situation, where such tiny differences do matter is when you have (almost) the same signal in two channels. Only then you would hear slight phase-related and amplitude-related effects but they would be so subtle that it would get lost in a full mix anyway. The main effect of making things wider comes from placing your stereo mics or ERs. The technical differences are way more crucial than any difference caused by TMT could ever be.
And before anyone comes up with "He doesn't know what he's talking about": I've been an mixing engineer for 23 years, been mixing on a 48channel Neve VR Legend.
There is one thing that hasn't been modelled yet - that is the bleeding of loud signals onto the next channel of a console. I believe this would have way more effect on a mix than TMT have ever had.
just want to note the the gain unity button behaves differently between the channelstrip and the masterbus version
Thanks!
I feel we have reached the end of the road with these type of plugins.
Now all that's left is an EQ that looks like Fab Filter with the analog sound of Acustica Audio. But again, people are still better off with something as simple as SlickEQ.
Reverbs are an exception because they can still scale more in 'realism' and 'other worldly beauty'
Nah. Competition between brands is good for us as customers. Keep em coming!
Really good point though....Do we really need more of these? They're not really the hardware. They go for this hardware replacement dream thing.... We don't need that. We have so many of the warming etc available already. We can get the curves that don't good and The compression styles that work..... We know the general things we want in a mix.
I say develop more new innovative pligins. Plugins that aren't pretending that they're not digital and take advantages of what's possible to do as a plugin.
Yeah I don't know. I don't mind channelstrip plugins, but for me, hardware is still more grabby which hasn't been emulated yet in channelstrips. Some more specific plugins have managed that already.
@@whitenoisestudio I don't dislike them or anything..It's the do we need more that are basically trying to emulate the specific board, question? And not doing much that the mixer couldn't do.... When it's a plugin. Doesn't need to have the same limitations
Good run-through, as always. You didn't seem to 'bash' it all, lol. I was expecting worse, as I rather like the 'sound'. There don't seem to be any videos of the hardware anywhere, which seems really odd. Any idea why Marlon?
Thanks! There are only 20 of that mixing desk around anymore, and my guess is they might not all be in the best shape. Still no excuse to have it not on video ofcourse ;-)
Master bus version could be cool if it functions like Slate VCC or Waves NLS.
I agree :-)
Since I discovered Acustica Audio a few years ago, non of this stuff can really tickle my fancy anymore. Only Fabfilter, TDR and a handful of other brands I will still use....
Acustica really does some great plugins, only their Guis are often very cramped. And I cannot keep up with their release schedule. It's also a bit weird when you get a plugin, in 3 weeks they will have the new greatest ever. I'm just afraid they go too hard right now and that somewhere it will break down..
@@whitenoisestudio heel eerlijk. Dat dacht ik ook. Echter, Ocean en Straw zijn van een ander kaliber. Verder is Frost, Pensado2 EQ en Magic Flow te gek. Maar ben het met je eens. Wat moet ik nu met al hun andere plugins lol. Die hypermode is wel echt waanzinnig.
Ik kan het allemaal niet meer bijhouden van ze. Het is zoveel ;-)
Not being able to create a dip lower than 700hz is awkward but I liked it, otherwise.
Pls do a comparison of 69
Hmm?
The “fader” transformer that is totally transparent is a bit of joke (if it is actually true).
Although, boosting the EQ into a saturated input gain is how most channel of a desk react.
It actually is very similar on an SSL desk for example. A thing that I haven’t noticed at all with PA SSL channelstrips and that only UAD emulated properly (to my despair).
So it’s def not something wrong here. I don’t know if you worked on analog desk long enough, but if you did you’d have maybe noticed that.
As much as PluginDoctor reviews are super useful and I thank you for doing so! I think it is important to have enough experience with the original piece to review a plugin that emulates it and be able to know what is to be expected from it.
Otherwise it’s almost like tasting chicken flavored crisps without having tasted chicken in your life before. And saying in a review online "These crisps have a weird taste, not like all the others, that's weird.". No it's not, it's how they are supposed to taste, if yall see what I mean :).
You can easily abuse plugin doctor, but it can be ok to show what is happening.
i disagree with your statement about having used the original hardware.
You can judge a plugin on it's own merits and come to a conclusion.
In a way but I might have not been clear enough about that point maybe. Let me rephrase :
When you talk about it saturating when pushing the EQ it’s actually a normal behavior. It’d be like analyzing a Pultec plugin and say “Damn be careful it adds harmonics” if you see what I mean. By knowing the hardware well, these types of “fake surprises” could be avoided. Obviously everybody can have an opinion about anything, as it comes down to taste. But saying that something is a bit odd whereas it is expected is another thing. If you see what I mean?
No offense at all intended by the way, I am no hater (and no snob too despite maybe how my first comment maybe sounded haha).
Haha no problem and I see where you come from.
On that specific part, I included that because I know most users and viewers are not familiar with how easily a console like this can be pushed into saturation like that.
On other emulations it's not always this easy ;-)
@@whitenoisestudio Yes that makes sense. On other channel emu it might actually not really be possible, as not all of them emulated that part of the circuit (unfortunately haha).
Sadly lindell channel strips are very linear and a joke.
boosts of eq are really smooth; similar to la2a compressor,...you hardly destroy the sound;
for the bus thing you mentioned,....look at robert babicz tutorial when he inserted plugin on every track without applied any settings....and then he did a/b ...it's really nice sounding....so 69 is the same,....i wonder why you didn't test and comment on that ?
Waves Helios emu adds a way more pleasant colour imo
I haven't seen anyone put your on every channel and AB. This is the best demonstration I've seen so far. Plugin alliance boosted so much. Not even pretending to level match...... ridiculous. Lindell has good oversimply right? It's been a while I think I remember that they do. And a lot of brainworks plugins don't. At least not nearly enough internally to cover aliasing with any kind of drive at all. Maybe they've gotten better recently.
This plugin has up to 16x oversampling and it cleans up aliasing nicely.
I don't want to really bash it, but since it's not a Waves Audio plugin, I'll bash it all day long!
Ok weird. You should ask the waves representatives what i told them straight to their faces about the subscription plan.
@@whitenoisestudio I'm sorry, but your videos from the past hunt you to be in ❤️ with Waves Audio 😆. In all the forums I go to, anyone discussing your channel always brings up your attachment to Waves Audio. I guess it's a stigma that you'll have a hard time getting rid of if you have changed your ❤️ about your stance with Waves Audio.
I was just pulling your leg on your title topic.
@@whitenoisestudioI'm a good sport and I'll thumbs up your video :)
All good!
Nah man, I am not trying to get rid of any stigma whatsoever.
I don't care about that.
When I am the first one to release a video when I say Waves made a huge mistake doesnt help, then nothing will.
Waves is always the number 1 plugin company for everyone to trash, justified or not.
it's very fashionable to be against Waves.
I found it to be very dissapointing to see all those Waves bashing videos after Waves' stupid subscription plans, when I knew frsthand I was the only one (!!) who actually told Wvaes directly it was a stupid idea. Such trendhoppers.
I approach their plugins unbiased and honestly basically every time their plugins are simply well designed with no flaws.
I couldnt be arsed to review their latest amp sims, they did nothing for me either positively or negatively.
hehehe
Better to learn your stock daw plugins than waste time and money deciding whether a plugin such as this is worth your money..
The compression sounds nice but that's not enough for me to buy it. Also, isn't the drive on the midrange band is kind of stupid?
That's the overall saturation on this plugin, which sound like that if you boost mids too much.
Of all the channel strips plugin alliance offers that I like, this isn't one of them.
😮😮😮
*boosts 10dB* bE CaReFuL ThaT SaTuRaTiOn HaPpEnS QuIcKlY 😂
yeah otherwise you wouldnt notice it. 10 points for taking the effort tO tYpE LiKe ThIs
Put it on vocals and see what happens...
The Mids are Weird in this Plugin..... probably not the best of Lindell Plugins
Man go ahead and bash it
lol
same channel strip, nothing new
only producer care about color, normal people GAF
Lame plugin
Another boring emulation
What are they thinking
Companies should be driven by money, better innovative plugins would sell better
You'd be surprised. A lot of people still hang in the '' old = good'' vibe.
@@whitenoisestudio I have my secret weapon too
THE NULL TEST @@
hahaha. For clean digital eq curves it certainly works ^^