We are Cushitic not Arabs and the only one confused is those that want to put the black label on anyone that is dark skinned because they want to be part of something outside their own culture.
Well done 👏🏾 I have seen countless videos about this and you explained better than anyone from genetic point to scientific prospective. Good job! I can see that you have researched this topic very well.
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 Somalis are not mixed with Arabs, Otherwise they would look like Swahili coastal people and Some Zanzibaris who are mixed with Arabs.
I’m Oromo the biggest tribe in east Africa we are black related Kemet to Nubia of Egypt and we are also related to Habish and Gala of India. We kushites have 0 percent relation to Arab or white by race. Proud to be black
OK but don't forget Kemet is an near eastern civilization and the closest ppl related to ancient Egyptians are the Negev Beduines and Yemenite Al Jawf not Oromo coming from an actually factual sorse. Secondly Habeshas came from the habeshat clan from Yemen there basically half Yemeni half Cushites at the time making that video I didn't know their origins and now I know and as a Yemenite I claim them. And don't lie to yourself if you Cushites have zero Arab ancestry you'll look like dinkas and mursis, Cushites the reason why you look unique is because of the partial west eurasian ancestry coming from Natufians. It's good to be proud and black as long as you're honest with historical facts.
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476arabs come from eastern africa Dna is older and history longer Migration to North africa and middle east levant region were linked before Europeans destroyed it and seperated and created the souze canal It means life started in east africa And arabs got our genes and recyle happend So arab are us
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476I’m not Cushitic I’m Tigray and it was Axum then along with Eritrea. We had relations with Yemen and that was when our Queen Saba expanded our territory for trade purposes but Yemenis were not white skinned then. That’s where Arabic comes from (it came much later than Ge’ez, Cushitic languages and local Yemeni indigenous languages)
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476habesha is not used in Ethiopia it is used by diaspora to cause les division. Arabic word since after Axum their wasn’t a name for Ethiopia and the people moved south into Cushitic territory and started mixing their wasn’t one significant ethnic group. Even Abysinnia is an outside name because it wasn’t established after Axum. It has nothing to do with outside ethnic groups mixing. Yemen means to the right in our language, Queen Saba gave them that name. Yemen means nothing to them as far as definition, they had their own indents ethnic group names
*info* Kushities speakers and Kushities are two different tribe and they never been same, as a Somali Kushities speakers this is our history. 1:our ancient language was *Af-re* = mouth of owners 2 our ancient name was *Re* = the owners 3:Our territory name was *Ifet* If= Universe Et = Land.... *Fir* people who migrated from *Ifet* have colonized Egypt but they were always horn of African indigenous
Thank you for making this video about the cushites or kushites, even though there are mistakes you made such as you failed mention the fact that the Oromo Borana are Oromo first. Furthermore, you also claim that the cushites or kushites are not black that's not true since we the noble Oromo we call ourselves black and kushites or cushites. Naagaayaa and peace from an Oromo sister :)
In a social construct you cushites are black but there is no such thing as a Black race there indeginous Black people in Australia India se asia and Africa ect but all these black skinned people are not related genetically and because of that scientifically Cushites are caucasoids and are more genetically and culturally related to North Africans and Middle easterners not with Bantus or West Africans.
@@rebbybam230if your Amharic maybe because the language has Cushitic influence but if you are Tigray or Tigre no your not Cushitic and your language doesn’t correlate you can’t force yourself on other peoples identity
How did you settle on the appearance of the natufians. My understanding is they were basically East Africans who lived moved to Eurasia. Those people existed before the migration of white skinned people. In the Neolithic period basically basically everyone everyone was black
Genetic tests Genetic analysis Your understanding is flawed if you base your evidence due to skin tone as the oldest Africans ( khoisanids ) today are much lighter than typical africans soo in your logic their less African.
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 the khoisans are old but they too have a skin color mutation that makes them mid brown. my understanding is based on research results. what genetic tests are you relying on? do you mind sharing????
Natufians came from east Africa. Not the other way around. Haplogroup E is African Haplogroup, the younger E1b1b is characterised as Natufian. When infact it is highly concentrated nearly entirely at the horn of Africa. Make no mistakes the confusion is because of the YT people and their divide and conquer tactics (calling them Caucusoids) that lead to multiple intertrible genocides and ethnic cleansing such as that seen in Rwanda.
This is facts. The E1b1b originates in east africa undoubtably. Horners are the ancestors of Natufian farmers and the Morrocan farmers. not the other way around. this was just recently discovered in 2007
@@Mohamed_xxc the proto-afroasiatics the fathers of all afroasiatics (hamitic+semitic+coptic) originated on the red sea in East Sudan, East Eritrea, and north Somalia. They migrated out going northeast into asia. and northwest into north africa. berbers and arabs are the sons of east africans. people used to think east africans are arabs(natufians) mixed with nilotic africans to create but thats not true. weve been here much longer. E1B1B migration pattern is proof
@@mkodyglobalsouthsoldierYou can check the dna studies done on Cushitic people! These studies shows they are mixed west Eurasian and East African. Every single study shows the SAME results. Some black Africans have problems with that and keep repeating the same nonsense again and again.
Yet ignorance is still rampant... people can't distinguish between ancient intermixing being the ethnogenesis of a people is not the same as modern admixture 😂
@Understanding Humans the girl you used when you was talking about amhara and tigre she is somali and her name is maya jamac. also you forget to mention the 2 biggaste sultanaes the ajuuran empire and the yacyuubi dynesty also known as hiraan imamate
5:08 the girl on the left is not Amhara. She’s half Somali half English. Not full Cushitic either.😑 (Edit: i meant right, she is a presenter in the UK)😅
and Kush or Akuch means God in Tamazight too. I think that there is a deep connection between imazighen all over the North Africa and the Cushitic people.
Here is a shorter talk version of the word Africoid. Africoid An inclusive term? A broad term, Africoid is used not only to describe peoples of Sub-Saharan African descent, those people today called Congoids (formerly called "Negroids"), but is also used to refer to other peoples who also often are also referred to as black, but whom some anthropologists have termed Hamitic, Capoid, Australoid (also known as Veddoid when applied to Southeast Asians), and Sudroids or more inclusively Dravidians, because they exhibit certain faciocranial and other physical characteristics which are not commonly attributed to Congoid (formerly called "Negroid") peoples. Chief among these physical characteristics are limited or nonexistent prognathism,a brachycephalic cranium (in the case of Capoid blacks), or hair which is relatively straight and finer in texture (in the case of, again, some "Caucasoid", Sudroid, Veddoid, and Australoid people).
Africoid Polynesians are seen as part Africoid due to the admixture of Australoid and Mongoloid characteristics. The Africoid concept is expounded upon in the works of Afrocentric scholars such as Cheikh Anta Diop, and Chancellor Williams. Criticism of race categorization Critics of the race classification school such as Alan Templeton, Rick Kittles and S.O.Y Keita generally reject emphasis on traditional racial categories. They hold that race is not very useful in understanding the movements and origins of peoples and that racial terms such as "Caucasoid" and "Negroid" too often seek to plug such peoples into stereotypical checkboxes and deny them the full range of human variability. This more race neutral view contradicts the assertions of some Afrocentrics as to idealized racial types but also echo concerns raised by writers like C.A. Diop, namely: why are European populations conceived of as varying so widely in skin color, features, hair, and other indices but not Africoids? Africoid as a term incorporating Oceanic, Dravidian and Australoid peoples Some Afrocentrists argue for the primacy of phenotypes in describing a broad cultural-genetic set of black peoples stretching from Africa to Australia to Asia. Other DNA data however, which details the genetic complexity of peoples, calls into question conceptions of a single, rigid black or "Africoid" type that cuts across broad areas including Asia and Australia. Physically there may be similarities (dark skin or curlier hair for example) but genetically the data are much more complex. Indeed some supporters of the term Africoid (see Scholarly use section below) note that DNA and serological (blood)analysis for example, places populations like Australian Aborigines, Dravidians of India and dark-skinned Pacific/Indian Ocean peoples closer to the populations of mainland East Asia than the stereotypical sub-Saharan Negroid phenotype. Scholarly use of the term Africoid descriptive of local populations Some mainstream scholars advocate a non-racial terminology more directly based on the local variability of the population data, and its changes over time, holding that this allows for a wide range of types and variation, and that continued use of racial definitions and concepts are problematic: "Much of the previous work focused on “racial” analysis. The concept of race is problematic, and (‘racial” terms have been inconsistently defined and used in African historiography as noted recently (MacGaffey, 1966; Sanders, 1969; Vercoutter, 1978).. There is little demarcation between the predynastics and tropical series and even the early southern dynastic series. Definite trends are discernible in the analyses. This broadly shared "southern" metric pattern, along with the other mentioned characteristics to a greater or lesser degree, might be better described by the term Africoid, by definition connoting a tropical African microclade, microadaptation, and patristic affinity, thereby avoiding the nonevolutionary term "Negroid" and allowing for variation both real and conceptual."
Somali son of Kush son of Ham son pf propehet Noah. We say we are not black because we see that term non native to our history and made up by colonialists. But that doesn't mean we don't love our African blood brothers. We are proud Africans.
Zanzibaris are mostly bantus with a little Arab admixture just 20 to 30 % depending on the individual, Somalis are not mixed with modern Arabs but share a Neolithic Ancestry with modern Arabs, the Natufians, who came to the horn mixed with the Indeginous proto nilotic and gave rise to Somalis. If Somalis mixed with Arabs they'll look like Habeshas as Habeshas are half Yemenis half Cushitic hybrid ethnic group.
The mixed people of Zanzibar are mixed with Arab and Bantu while half of Somali peoples DNA are Nilotic related. Nilotes are phenotypically different than Bantus. So idk what's so hard to understand?
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 No, The Somali/ Cushitic entire dna originates from the horn of Africa and it's native to the horn, where humanity started. It is not mixed with natufians that you said came to the horn and mixed with the indigenous proto nilotic and gave rise to Somalis and is also not mixed with any others. With that theory you are implying that humanity started outside of horn of Africa/Africa. Ancient people migrated from the horn of Africa and went to other parts of the world.
I just searched Somali people on Pinterest and Viola I don't know that she was mixed at that time am not an expert on mixed phenotypes hope you understand
@h.u.m.a.n.s476 Somalis like promoting mixed/lighter skin Somalis because of how global beauty standards are like. Sorta like how all the Bollywood actress are very light skin Indians but if you go to India you'll see the majority of Indian women are much darker. Most Somali women are look nothing like those pictures you posted. They're typically darker with more obvious African features. Just like how most Indian women don't look white as Bollywood potrays.
Don't mix truth with Arabo/Eurocentric narratives. Cush are not Arabs or so called caucasian race. “When his majesty took action against the Asiatic sand-dwellers, his majesty made an army of many tens of thousands from all of Upper Egypt: ...; from Lower Egypt: ...; and from Irtjet-Nubians, Medja-Nubians, Yam-Nubians, Wawat-Nubians, Kaau-Nubians; and from Tjemeh-land". Written in 6th dynasty of Kemet 4k years ago, and as seen on ancient tomb wall paintings, Cush Kingdom and Nubia region in general had not just Cush, but multitude of tribes that were coalesced into federation. The horn of Africa, was known as PWNT to Kemet. East central Africa was known as Ta Netjer, Land of Gods. With the Pygmy people being referred to as the dancers of the Gods.
Hello bro,my compliments for the efforts you put into this video,however I would like to clarify some things first.The term Cushite and people from the kingdom of Kush should not be confused,some people have got it mixed it up,whether it is a twist of historical context or plain ignorance I don't know.The real people of Kush are nilo-saharan such as the Nubians who still exist to this day in Sudan in Kordofan,Nuba mountains or Northen Sudan.The Cushites however are distinctly seperate from the kingdom of Kush.In the context of the Somali they hail from Punt as it was once called or parts of Abbysinia in what is now modern day Ethiopia.Of course this is not an attack on my cushitic brothers,I just wanted to point out the facts as such mistakes could lead to dilution of history in the long run.
Bro, You're 80% off on your research. Furthermore, the Somalis in the contemporary pictures you're displaying aren't pure Somalis. Not all of them are true cushites, the majority are well known or famous half-Somalis and half-White or half-Arab. Therefore, I'm not sure what you're attempting to prove here. Do your research thoroughly before uploading inaccurate data.
Name the points that you think am wrong if your can debate And who cares if there half somali half white or Arab ave found those pictures on Pinterest written underneath the Pinterest pic Somali girls soo how do you expect me to know their biographies of mixed ancestry while am searching for a thumnail picture and to be honest ave come across lighter skinned pure Somali women who look exactly like that.
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 To begin with, you and I cannot even debate about what Somalis are since I’m Somali and you are not. And If I may correct you, the Somali people have existed for thousands of years, well before the historical period of North Africas you’ve mentioned, dating back to the era of the ancient Egyptians. Have you thought about the possibility that the individuals you stated who got together and then ‘paw’💥 like a big bang from which Somalis emerged if they are actually from Cushities? excluding Niloties. rather than the other way around? You have obviously not done enough research on that. Secondly, you should have a professional representative from the country whose pictures you want to display, rather than visiting Pinterest to discover some incorrect images. Modern Somalis are particularly difficult to understand due of their extreme diversity. For instance, throughout the last centuries and even more recently, people from Persia, South and West Asia, and crazy as it may seem even Chinese and Portuguese have been to the Horn of Africa(Somalia). (Btw Vasco Da Gama's son Cristóvão da Gama, who was murdered in 1542, is buried in Somalia.) so, as a result, Somalis are diverse. This explains why some have fair skin, some have dark skin and straight hair, and some even have that Chinese look. But that is only a surface-level mixture. there are also pure Somalis too. While some Somali girls do have fair complexion, most Somali women prefer to seem lighter or fairer, thus they often bleach their skin to give the appearance you see. To be honest, though, some of the older photos are authentic Somalis.
@@yassinosman7346I understand what you're saying and only a small percentage of the Somali population could really count as mixed race and those are the mostly light-skinned ones who have ancestors from Yemen
Somalis are way blacker and more African in appearance than the pictures you chose. Go watch some videos from Mogadishu or Hargeisa with people just walking around. They don't look like your selected pictures which cherry picked more lighter skin ambiguous looking Somalis. Your average Somali aint get confused for anything other than black African. @h.u.m.a.n.s476
There is a debate that Semetic language actually arised from Africa through the Habesha people. The Habesha you put here are Cushites that started to speak Semetic languages later. This is wrong. There is the D'amat kingdom which is Semetic that was there before the influence of Cush on Habesha. Infact we did have all the religious practices of ancient Egypt and could be the land of Punt they are talking about. I guess that is why they ignore our D'amat empire or that there is absoutely no difference to our civilizaiton with what they call the Saba kingdom because they are the same and it was actually our influence on Arabia. We also dont have that towering thing you talked about that the cushitic people have and have the most ancient form of the Semetic language that is north of us. What I am saying is we are a race on our own and aren't cushite.
Well you're wrong here's why. When making that video I didn't know anything about the Habeshas except for speaking south semitic languages, but when I started fishing out the origins of the Habeshas as a Yemenite I was very surprised and happy, the origins of Habeshas is the yemenic tribe of Habeshat who when Saba had territories in the Ethiopian highlands settled there, this Habeshat tribe later evolved into the Habesha identity and its clans or subtribes later evolved into actual tribes like Amharas, tigreans and Harares etc, The Habeshas were for a long time ethnic Yemenis but over time through intermirrages or concubinage absorbed the neighbouring cushitic admixure that's why modern Habeshas look in between Yemenite Semitic and Cushites as for the origins of semitic language it comes from the proto Afroasiatic people known as proto Natufians who later evolved into Levant Neolithic Farmers, Iberomerucians and Natufian hunter gatherer and which with other foreign admixure later evolved into Arabs, Egyptians, Levantines, Mesopotamians, Amazigh, Cushites and the Habeshas, and proto Natufians comes from the levant sinai area.
This video is wrong about how the mixing happened but right about East Africans being mixed. First of all lets use logic. Why would farmers from the Middle East migrate into Africa? Especially when you consider that Cushites are nomads and not farmers. It makes more sense for nomads to migrate than farmers. Also why is there more linguistic diversity of the Afro-Asiatic family in East Africa than in the Middle East if the migration was from outside of Africa into Africa? What makes more sense is East African nomadic herders migrated from Africa into Asia and spread the Afro-Asiatic languages and their genes outward than the reverse.
@@StopTheLiess cushitic means someone who live or has lived in Kush kingdom and speak cushitic language. Tutsi are cushitic people but have lost their cushitic language because they live with Bantu people. Somali, oromo , Sidama, stayed with cushitic people , It is why the have kept the cushitic language. It's easy to loose the language. Tutsi of Rwanda speak Rwanda language, Tutsi of Burundi speak Burundi language, Tutsi- Bahima of Uganda speak uganda language. They are same Tutsi but speak different language because the have lost the Tutsi original language.
The term Caucasian is built on pseudo science. This is from Wikipedia: -The Caucasus as the origin of humanity and the peak of beauty - In the eighteenth century, the prevalent view among European scholars was that the human species had its origin in the region of the Caucasus Mountains.[22] This view was based upon the Caucasus being the location for the purported landing point of Noah's Ark - from whom the Bible states that humanity is descended - and the location for the suffering of Prometheus, who in Hesiod's myth had crafted humankind from clay.[22] In addition, the most beautiful humans were reputed by Europeans to be the stereotypical "Circassian beauties" and the Georgian people; both Georgia and Circassia are in the Caucasus region.[23][22] The "Circassian beauty" stereotype had its roots in the Middle Ages, while the reputation for the attractiveness of the Georgian people was developed by early modern travellers to the region such as Jean Chardin.[22][24]
It’s a pretty good video over all but the Narrator must be careful when saying not related or unrelated. He must understand that he is making an assumption when he says certain groups are not related to each other. Unless you believe all tribes of people came each from a unique creator independently of each other
But the thing is I can't tell Cushites apart you all look the same and instead of hating each other come together unite have solidarity just like the Arabs do
there is no identity crisis lol very offensive when the people have a clear identity! I could apply the words identity crisis to other groups such as North Africans but a Somali I can spot easily from a mile away!
In the West it's another case where you're identity is the colour of your skin. And North Africans have no identity crisis there Egyptians there Amazighs and there Arabs where is the identity crisis in that.
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476You say ancient egypt is not Black African. Obviously you don't have a sense of time. You think that Kushites were not black. You are confused. There were Black people in India, the Buddah was a Black African. You really need to come out of your box and do more research and stop contradicting yourself and misleading people
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 Egyptologists say Egypt was white, they show us the difference between the dark brown and black drawings and say dark brown and brown images are Egyptian and the black images are Kushite. All those images are black Africans. And you saying Kushites are mix breed, your brain has been white-washed. Stop what you're doing. Who do you think you're doing a favour? What do you think you're proving? Stop it
There are 4 races,black,white,asiatic and brown. Browns are mixed race. Most blacks do not have other race admixture. Most whites have other race admixture and most asiatics have other race admixture. Mixed and admixture are not same thing by the way. The only race that is mixed is browns and they are intermediate types.
False the white is just genes adaptation of colder climates the neolithic ancestors of Europeans were light brown skinned similar to tan southern Europeans who had the genetic adaptation for white skin and got mutated once settled in Northern Europe for centuries and brown skin is not an intermediate skintone as you claim its the normal one coz almost all the ancestors of Europeans, north africans and west asians were brown and those who lived in colder climates got mutated to white that's why in every brown family in North africa or west Asia can have 2 or 3 members who are either white skinned or darker.
quote- African peoples are the most diverse in the world whether analyzed by DNA or skeletal or cranial methods. The peoples of the Nile Valley quote- Simplistic "race percentage" models are dubious in Africa which has the highest genetic diversity in the world. That diversity proceeded from deeper sub-Saharan Africa, to East and N.E. Africa, then to the rest of the globe. All other populations, including Europeans and "Middle easterners" carry this diversity which was built into Africa to begin with. Africans thus don't need any "race mix" to look different. Their diversity is built-in and supplied the whole globe. Any returnees or "backflow" to Africa looked like Africans, including Europeans. (Brace 2005, Hanihara 1996, Holliday 2003). and quote- African people have a range of physical variation and don't need inspiration or mixes from cold-climate/light skinned Europeans or Asiatics to explain why. Features like narrow noses, thin lips, height etc are all indigenous to Africa. Africa has both the highest phenotypic diversity and the highest genetic diversity in the world and don’t need cold-climate/light skin inspiration for that established fact. All cold-climate/light skinned Europeans and Asiatics are SUBSETS of original African diversity. Modern DNA studies find even though some African peoples look different, they are genetically related through the PN2 transition clade of the Y-chromosome. Thus light-skinned African Libyans and dark-skinned Zulus are all genetically related Africans, even though they don't look exactly the same. (Keita 2004; Tishkoff 2002, Ely et al, 2006, Stevanovitch 2004)
proto nilotic theory is false some cushitic mixed a bit with them while they were in the nile but not all and cushitic originated along the red sea and moved in to egypt and sudan and went back into the horn and kenya while some cushitic like the beja still live in egypt and sudan
Nilotes and cushites never mixed. They don’t even speak similar languages, have similar cultures or food. When someone tells you their history you can’t believe it but you can believe things that have no real sources. Btw Yemenis never looked like that back then. Those are Persian features and Persians are the birth of a lot of white ethnic groups, Hindu etc. they came well after the horns. Greeks were the first to come. This natufian group we never heard of until the internet which have no artifacts left today were non existent if you ask me. Persians are not related to Horners they went to war with Axum for land and along with other kingdoms. But Persians are the birth of Europeans and “Asians” mainly Hindu
You have no idea what your talking about all your talking point can be debunked by factual science and anthropological evidences. The Cushites are a result of Natufians who's modern unmixed descendants are the people found in Socotra, dhofar and mahra provinces and the proto nilotics who's modern unmixed descendants are the mursi people they mixed when the mostly male Natufians started to arrive in the horn and gave rise to the cushitic people who's culture is similar to the socoris and mehris etc their nilotic ancestors are still living a neolithic lifestyle till this day. And you Persians were the origins of whites is another blatant lie . The Yemenites look different from the Beduine gulf Arabs who are similar in terms of genetics and your comparing them to Persians out of all people, Yemenites have Yemenid phenotype and look semitic with either brown, olives to pale depending on the tribe not like Persians who look like light skinned indians with gracile features.
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 where are your artifacts and sources that their were contact with random people called Naturian and so on. Their appearance has never changed get over it and stop forcing yourself on people’s history. Learn about your own roots
@StopTheLiess I know a shit load of my roots iven the smallest detail you and Here is a summary of the key archaeological evidence regarding the Natufian culture: The Natufians were a sedentary hunter-gatherer culture that existed in the Levant region (modern-day Israel, Palestine, Jordan, Lebanon) from around 15,000 to 11,500 years ago, during the Epipaleolithic period. They are considered a key precursor to the development of agriculture and the Neolithic Revolution in the region. Some of the major archaeological evidence of the Natufians includes: 1. Settlements and Structures: - Natufian settlements were semi-permanent, with evidence of substantial stone-built houses and structures. - Excavations have uncovered large, circular or oval stone foundations that likely supported wooden superstructures and roofs. - These settlements were often situated in caves, rock shelters, or on hilltops, suggesting a more sedentary lifestyle compared to earlier Paleolithic cultures. 2. Tools and Implements: - The Natufians produced a variety of stone tools, including sickle blades, pestles, grinding stones, and stone axes, indicating the processing of wild grains and other plant materials. - They also used bone tools, such as harpoons, awls, and needles, which may have been used for fishing, sewing, and other daily tasks. - The presence of these specialized tools suggests an increasing reliance on the exploitation of wild plant and animal resources. 3. Burials and Cemeteries: - Natufian burial practices reveal a complex social organization, with evidence of ritual behavior and the beginnings of social stratification. - Excavations have uncovered Natufian cemeteries, where individuals were buried with a variety of grave goods, such as shells, beads, and animal remains. - Some burials also show evidence of intentional cranial deformation, which may have been a cultural practice. 4. Art and Symbolic Objects: - Natufian sites have yielded a range of artistic and symbolic objects, including carved stone and bone sculptures, decorative items such as beads and pendants, and rock art. - These artifacts suggest the development of symbolic thinking and the beginnings of artistic expression in this culture. 5. Subsistence and Diet: - The Natufians relied on a broad spectrum of wild plants and animals, including the hunting of gazelle, deer, and other mammals, as well as the gathering of wild cereals and legumes. - Evidence of the intensified exploitation of wild grasses, such as the presence of sickle blades and grinding stones, indicates a shift towards more intensive plant food processing and the potential beginnings of plant domestication. The Natufian culture is considered a crucial transition between the Paleolithic and Neolithic periods, as it shows the development of more complex social structures, the beginnings of plant and animal domestication, and the emergence of the first sedentary communities in the Levant region. You want evidence for Natufians here read for your self.
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 where are their LIVE artifacts not these made in stories with no real facts or legitimate sources? You really don’t know about your origins in sure your confusing your origins with other peoples origins.
But those in Kenya looks strange like they look different , from the other oromos , other oromos look identical to habesha semetic , some across Kenyan it's border looks darker n different
We are a Cushitic, we have beautiful cultures, and we are pure BLACK African. Sub-Saharan African have different shapes and features, and no one looks like others example South Sudanese dont look like Nigerian or South African. Like wise, we have oure own African shape and we are pure BLACK African not mixed
Yes you are mixed every human race is mixed there's no purity no pure race name one race that is pure maybe the andamanese people and Cushites are also mixed-up if not explain why you have semitic features even though your subsaharan and Semites are not subsaharan explain that.
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 no we don't have semitic features we have cushitic features even Tutsi in Rwanda they have cushitic features no one is calling them that they have semitic features sorry bro you claiming something that doesn't belong to you
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 "Why you have Semitic features even though your sub-Saharan and Semites are not sub-Saharan explain that. "The chicken or the egg? Amniotic eggs showed up roughly 340 million or so years ago, and the first 🐔chickens evolving at around 58 thousand years ago at the earliest, it's a safe bet to say the 🥚egg came first. Eggs were around way before chickens even existed. Btw. the Cushitic are the "eggs" via the 'Out of Africa' theory...proved by your own statement about " maybe the Andamanese people"🤦♂
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 You must have never been to the Caribbean, if you say this. Just because you know some Jamaicans in England doesn't meen you know Caribbean people. ruclips.net/video/fAZBLzWCUbU/видео.html
You mean the Kushites? They are black lets not go there AT ALL. 25th Dynasty Kushite Kemet pharoah was described as The Assyrian King Esarhaddon describes Taharqa's captured family as: “His wives, his sons and [his] daughters [who]se bodies like his, have skins as black as asphalt (he counted as booty)" Also, Arabs didn't enter Sudan until the 12th Century after the fall of Christianity!
Good work. And i agree with most statements. But the origin of ancient egyptian and i mean ancient not the hellenistic or roman egypt which came after 400-300bc are a combination of different african groups like cushitic, nilotic, chadic and khoisan in lower egypt (the cultural and politic center) with the ancient north african and descendents of the natufians and some smaller percentage of asiatic groups were also present in upper egypt (the delta). If you are skeptical about this please just compare the different kushitic and chadic hairstyle with the ancient egyptian ones. The reason for those population movements were the climate change in africa with the desertification of the GREEN SAHARA. Which triggered population movement in africa and brought all those different groups together in the nile valley. Also please google if the ancient natufian had any neanderthal admixture which only african group didnt had.
The African groups you mentioned might have contributed to the Ancient Egyptian genome yet the mullato apperence to some Egyptians but their genomic contribution was overshadowed by the neolithic populations that meet in the Egyptian nile and mixed like the Natufians, Anatolian farmers and Zagros farmer the saharra was green at that period and even before the saharra desertification began
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 The groups you were talking about are also mentioned by the ancient egyptian and were called the hyksos (which means foreigner) around 1500 bc. The true originator of ancient egypt where the people of napta playa. Napta playa was a astronomical observatory which was used to watch the same star constellation that the later pyramids also watched. And you can also find similiar observatory in africa like "adams calender" in south africa. I dont deny the contribution of the natufians but there were concentrated more in the delta region then the heart land of egypt. And most genetic study were done in roman & hellenistic eras close to the delta. The most convincing argument for a southward origin is the example of the Legendary Land of Punt also reffered go as "Ta netjer". The land of Gods. Hatshepsut build a temple and also depicted the puntites on them. And they depitected them the same way as they would depicted themselves. And punt clear lays in the horn of africa because of the trade goods which where identified. Ancient egypt will always remain a mystery to people who close of they eyes to the connection to other african societies. But if you compare egyptian culture, gods, hairstyle, music instruments and depictions of themselves to other african groups before 700bc the truth will become undeniably.
I have a close realative that have dna from one of the Pharoah your lies are starting to crumble I also have east african dna I am Black american your lies are crumbling
@@dedunscrown-js8clactually scientists have proven in a recent study that the Land of Punt was in Somalia, Somali ruled Djibouti, Somali ruled east Ethiopia (Ogaden region aka somali state Ethiopia) and parts of Eritrea (only the afar coast)
@@dedunscrown-js8cl horn of Africa coastal people (Somalia, Somali populated and ruled Djibouti, and Eritrea) was the land of punt... East Africa covers countries like south Sudan Kenya Uganda tannzania which had nothing to do with the ancient coastal Cushitic Afroasiatic tribes of the Horn of Africa where all scholars place the land of Punt
![Kingdom of Kush - History Of Africa with Zeinab Badawi [Episode 4]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CwaP1kyAqqo/mqdefault.jpg)
We are Cushitic race from prophet Noah son Ham am from Somalia 🇸🇴 respect ✊
And Ham raped Noah's wife and Ham and the Kushites were cursed by Noah.. nothing to be proud about.
Then who is Nilotic ?
We are Cushitic not Arabs and the only one confused is those that want to put the black label on anyone that is dark skinned because they want to be part of something outside their own culture.
We are Somali. We are proud to be pure BLACK African
Farhan EXACTLY!!! its offensive to say identity crisis when they know what they are -SOmali!
Well done 👏🏾 I have seen countless videos about this and you explained better than anyone from genetic point to scientific prospective. Good job! I can see that you have researched this topic very well.
Thank you very much I appreciate your honesty and am glad you find my video useful thank you
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 Somalis are not mixed with Arabs, Otherwise they would look like Swahili coastal people and Some Zanzibaris who are mixed with Arabs.
I’m Oromo the biggest tribe in east Africa we are black related Kemet to Nubia of Egypt and we are also related to Habish and Gala of India. We kushites have 0 percent relation to Arab or white by race.
Proud to be black
OK but don't forget
Kemet is an near eastern civilization and the closest ppl related to ancient Egyptians are the Negev Beduines and Yemenite Al Jawf not Oromo coming from an actually factual sorse.
Secondly Habeshas came from the habeshat clan from Yemen there basically half Yemeni half Cushites at the time making that video I didn't know their origins and now I know and as a Yemenite I claim them.
And don't lie to yourself if you Cushites have zero Arab ancestry you'll look like dinkas and mursis, Cushites the reason why you look unique is because of the partial west eurasian ancestry coming from Natufians.
It's good to be proud and black as long as you're honest with historical facts.
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476arabs come from eastern africa
Dna is older and history longer
Migration to North africa and middle east levant region were linked before Europeans destroyed it and seperated and created the souze canal
It means life started in east africa
And arabs got our genes and recyle happend
So arab are us
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476I’m not Cushitic I’m Tigray and it was Axum then along with Eritrea. We had relations with Yemen and that was when our Queen Saba expanded our territory for trade purposes but Yemenis were not white skinned then. That’s where Arabic comes from (it came much later than Ge’ez, Cushitic languages and local Yemeni indigenous languages)
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476habesha is not used in Ethiopia it is used by diaspora to cause les division. Arabic word since after Axum their wasn’t a name for Ethiopia and the people moved south into Cushitic territory and started mixing their wasn’t one significant ethnic group. Even Abysinnia is an outside name because it wasn’t established after Axum. It has nothing to do with outside ethnic groups mixing. Yemen means to the right in our language, Queen Saba gave them that name. Yemen means nothing to them as far as definition, they had their own indents ethnic group names
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476what artifacts are left of these Nauruans because we never heard of them and I have no reason to believe they existed
*info* Kushities speakers and Kushities are two different tribe and they never been same, as a Somali Kushities speakers this is our history.
1:our ancient language was *Af-re* = mouth of owners
2 our ancient name was *Re* = the owners
3:Our territory name was *Ifet* If= Universe Et = Land....
*Fir* people who migrated from *Ifet* have colonized Egypt but they were always horn of African indigenous
Thank you for making this video about the cushites or kushites, even though there are mistakes you made such as you failed mention the fact that the Oromo Borana are Oromo first. Furthermore, you also claim that the cushites or kushites are not black that's not true since we the noble Oromo we call ourselves black and kushites or cushites. Naagaayaa and peace from an Oromo sister :)
In a social construct you cushites are black but there is no such thing as a Black race there indeginous Black people in Australia India se asia and Africa ect but all these black skinned people are not related genetically and because of that scientifically Cushites are caucasoids and are more genetically and culturally related to North Africans and Middle easterners not with Bantus or West Africans.
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 why did you not mention tigre and Amhara as Cushites tho ?????????? Cus we speak semetic so we are mixed of semetic too ?
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 why not mention habeshas as Cushites?
@@rebbybam230because we’re not cushites
@@rebbybam230if your Amharic maybe because the language has Cushitic influence but if you are Tigray or Tigre no your not Cushitic and your language doesn’t correlate you can’t force yourself on other peoples identity
How did you settle on the appearance of the natufians. My understanding is they were basically East Africans who lived moved to Eurasia. Those people existed before the migration of white skinned people. In the Neolithic period basically basically everyone everyone was black
Genetic tests
Genetic analysis
Your understanding is flawed if you base your evidence due to skin tone as the oldest Africans ( khoisanids ) today are much lighter than typical africans soo in your logic their less African.
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 the khoisans are old but they too have a skin color mutation that makes them mid brown. my understanding is based on research results. what genetic tests are you relying on? do you mind sharing????
😂 in the end you were right 👌 100% spot on.
It’s about tribes... we all African
All the indiegous tribes of Africa were black!
Natufians came from east Africa. Not the other way around. Haplogroup E is African Haplogroup, the younger E1b1b is characterised as Natufian. When infact it is highly concentrated nearly entirely at the horn of Africa. Make no mistakes the confusion is because of the YT people and their divide and conquer tactics (calling them Caucusoids) that lead to multiple intertrible genocides and ethnic cleansing such as that seen in Rwanda.
This is facts. The E1b1b originates in east africa undoubtably. Horners are the ancestors of Natufian farmers and the Morrocan farmers. not the other way around. this was just recently discovered in 2007
@@ibrahimelmi210sources: siad barre’s toilet💀
It doesn’t say the horn but rather it says east africa which is modern day sudan
@@Mohamed_xxc the proto-afroasiatics the fathers of all afroasiatics (hamitic+semitic+coptic) originated on the red sea in East Sudan, East Eritrea, and north Somalia. They migrated out going northeast into asia. and northwest into north africa. berbers and arabs are the sons of east africans. people used to think east africans are arabs(natufians) mixed with nilotic africans to create but thats not true. weve been here much longer. E1B1B migration pattern is proof
@@ibrahimelmi210 bro yes we are a mix😂😂😂😂😂
And where did you pull this from? Your ass?
great work! very clear
Thank you!
As Kushitc Somali thank you for this great work
Pleasure is all mine brother you can watch the specific video I made about the somalis
Where ajuran empire rolled some many countries
ok
At 1:01 the women with hazel eyes she not Cushtic but Blasian Jamaician women who has Africian and South Asian, Eurpean mixed backgound
Thanks 👍 for reminding me she passed for a cushite thus I thought that she was a cushite
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 Just really think about what you stated here🤣
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476mad level of running a show
If pictures not correct
Is your txt and script correct ??? 😂
@@mkodyglobalsouthsoldierYou can check the dna studies done on Cushitic people! These studies shows they are mixed west Eurasian and East African. Every single study shows the SAME results. Some black Africans have problems with that and keep repeating the same nonsense again and again.
This topic has been done to death, and 1:53 good to see I'm still a bit of an influential figure, LOL!
Thank you very much
ya its true
Yet ignorance is still rampant... people can't distinguish between ancient intermixing being the ethnogenesis of a people is not the same as modern admixture 😂
I agree@@skp8748
That image is a bit outdated though, it's a Mozabite man, when it should be a brown skinned Sa'idi Egyptian, also more like +80% and ~20%.
that theory is debunked
@Understanding Humans the girl you used when you was talking about amhara and tigre she is somali and her name is maya jamac. also you forget to mention the 2 biggaste sultanaes the ajuuran empire and the yacyuubi dynesty also known as hiraan imamate
Ave made a video about Somalis and in that video I mentioned those kingdoms and those girls it's Pinterest I search and download
5:08 the girl on the left is not Amhara. She’s half Somali half English. Not full Cushitic either.😑 (Edit: i meant right, she is a presenter in the UK)😅
Amharas are half Yemenite half Cushite they have some cushitic blood in them
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 oké… and your point being?
@@rebz549 she looks somali without hijab
No one thinks Cushites are Arab. Why do non-cushites always bring this up?
I am proud to be Cushitic ❤️💚🤍
and Kush or Akuch means God in Tamazight too. I think that there is a deep connection between imazighen all over the North Africa and the Cushitic people.
Thanks for sharing
Amazigh language is in the same camp as the cushitic language as its called hamitic languages.
Cushitic folks are not caucasoids.That's pseudo science if any one says that.They are Africoid peoples.
Here is a shorter talk version of the word Africoid.
Africoid
An inclusive term?
A broad term, Africoid is used not only to describe peoples of
Sub-Saharan African descent, those people today called Congoids
(formerly called "Negroids"), but is also used to refer to other
peoples who also often are also referred to as black, but whom some
anthropologists have termed Hamitic, Capoid, Australoid (also known as
Veddoid when applied to Southeast Asians), and Sudroids or more
inclusively Dravidians, because they exhibit certain faciocranial and
other physical characteristics which are not commonly attributed to
Congoid (formerly called "Negroid") peoples. Chief among these
physical characteristics are limited or nonexistent
prognathism,a brachycephalic cranium (in the case of
Capoid blacks), or hair which is relatively straight and finer in
texture (in the case of, again, some "Caucasoid", Sudroid, Veddoid,
and Australoid people).
Africoid
Polynesians are seen as part Africoid due to
the admixture of Australoid and Mongoloid characteristics.
The Africoid concept is expounded upon in the works of Afrocentric
scholars such as Cheikh Anta Diop, and Chancellor Williams.
Criticism of race categorization
Critics of the race classification school such as Alan Templeton,
Rick Kittles and S.O.Y Keita generally reject emphasis on traditional
racial categories. They hold that race is not very useful in
understanding the movements and origins of peoples and that racial
terms such as "Caucasoid" and "Negroid" too often seek to plug such
peoples into stereotypical checkboxes and deny them the full range of
human variability. This more race neutral view contradicts the
assertions of some Afrocentrics as to idealized racial types but
also echo concerns raised by writers like C.A. Diop, namely: why are
European populations conceived of as varying so widely in skin color,
features, hair, and other indices but not Africoids?
Africoid as a term incorporating Oceanic, Dravidian and Australoid peoples
Some Afrocentrists argue for the primacy of phenotypes in describing a
broad cultural-genetic set of black peoples stretching from Africa to
Australia to Asia. Other DNA data however, which details the
genetic complexity of peoples, calls into question conceptions of a
single, rigid black or "Africoid" type that cuts across broad areas
including Asia and Australia. Physically there may be similarities
(dark skin or curlier hair for example) but genetically the data are
much more complex.
Indeed some supporters of the term Africoid (see Scholarly use section
below) note that DNA and serological (blood)analysis for example,
places populations like Australian Aborigines, Dravidians of India and
dark-skinned Pacific/Indian Ocean peoples closer to the populations of
mainland East Asia than the stereotypical sub-Saharan Negroid
phenotype.
Scholarly use of the term Africoid descriptive of local populations
Some mainstream scholars advocate a non-racial terminology more
directly based on the local variability of the population data, and
its changes over time, holding that this allows for a wide range of
types and variation, and that continued use of racial definitions and
concepts are problematic:
"Much of the previous work focused on “racial” analysis. The concept
of race is problematic, and (‘racial” terms have been inconsistently
defined and used in African historiography as noted recently
(MacGaffey, 1966; Sanders, 1969; Vercoutter, 1978).. There is little
demarcation between the predynastics and tropical series and even the
early southern dynastic series. Definite trends are discernible in the
analyses. This broadly shared "southern" metric pattern, along with
the other mentioned characteristics to a greater or lesser degree,
might be better described by the term Africoid, by definition
connoting a tropical African microclade, microadaptation, and
patristic affinity, thereby avoiding the nonevolutionary term
"Negroid" and allowing for variation both real and conceptual."
I am Black american and I have people in my family that look like them they would fit perfectly
Glory seeking slave
Somali son of Kush son of Ham son pf propehet Noah.
We say we are not black because we see that term non native to our history and made up by colonialists. But that doesn't mean we don't love our African blood brothers. We are proud Africans.
Somalis are not mixed with Arabs, Otherwise they would look like Swahili coastal people and Some Zanzibaris who are mixed with Arabs.
Zanzibaris are mostly bantus with a little Arab admixture just 20 to 30 % depending on the individual, Somalis are not mixed with modern Arabs but share a Neolithic Ancestry with modern Arabs, the Natufians, who came to the horn mixed with the Indeginous proto nilotic and gave rise to Somalis.
If Somalis mixed with Arabs they'll look like Habeshas as Habeshas are half Yemenis half Cushitic hybrid ethnic group.
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 omg stop this none sense
What nonsense everything there has historical context.
The mixed people of Zanzibar are mixed with Arab and Bantu while half of Somali peoples DNA are Nilotic related. Nilotes are phenotypically different than Bantus. So idk what's so hard to understand?
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 No, The Somali/ Cushitic entire dna originates from the horn of Africa and it's native to the horn, where humanity started. It is not mixed with natufians that you said came to the horn and mixed with the indigenous proto nilotic and gave rise to Somalis and is also not mixed with any others. With that theory you are implying that humanity started outside of horn of Africa/Africa. Ancient people migrated from the horn of Africa and went to other parts of the world.
3:35 The girl on the left is half Somali and half Swedish. I think it would be better if you did not use half cushites in your videos.
I just searched Somali people on Pinterest and Viola I don't know that she was mixed at that time am not an expert on mixed phenotypes hope you understand
Her father is somali and cushitik
What is wrong with that if her father is somali and so she is cushitic
Her father is a blond swedish man. Her mother is Somali@@MyMohamednur
@h.u.m.a.n.s476 Somalis like promoting mixed/lighter skin Somalis because of how global beauty standards are like. Sorta like how all the Bollywood actress are very light skin Indians but if you go to India you'll see the majority of Indian women are much darker. Most Somali women are look nothing like those pictures you posted. They're typically darker with more obvious African features. Just like how most Indian women don't look white as Bollywood potrays.
Aksum or Akhsum or Axsum means ''Meat" In all Tamazight (Berber) dialects.
Nice to know
But there's a habesha empire called Axum
And the habeshas comes from the habeshat clan from Yemen.
Ethiopians arabs basically i learned here
@@anirbellahcen5551 lies Aksum means the name. It’s full name is three words
Don't mix truth with Arabo/Eurocentric narratives. Cush are not Arabs or so called caucasian race.
“When his majesty took action against the Asiatic sand-dwellers, his majesty made an army of many tens of thousands from all of Upper Egypt: ...; from Lower Egypt: ...; and from Irtjet-Nubians, Medja-Nubians, Yam-Nubians, Wawat-Nubians, Kaau-Nubians; and from Tjemeh-land".
Written in 6th dynasty of Kemet 4k years ago, and as seen on ancient tomb wall paintings, Cush Kingdom and Nubia region in general had not just Cush, but multitude of tribes that were coalesced into federation. The horn of Africa, was known as PWNT to Kemet. East central Africa was known as Ta Netjer, Land of Gods. With the Pygmy people being referred to as the dancers of the Gods.
Theirs is no pygmies in the horn or ever were
Hello bro,my compliments for the efforts you put into this video,however I would like to clarify some things first.The term Cushite and people from the kingdom of Kush should not be confused,some people have got it mixed it up,whether it is a twist of historical context or plain ignorance I don't know.The real people of Kush are nilo-saharan such as the Nubians who still exist to this day in Sudan in Kordofan,Nuba mountains or Northen Sudan.The Cushites however are distinctly seperate from the kingdom of Kush.In the context of the Somali they hail from Punt as it was once called or parts of Abbysinia in what is now modern day Ethiopia.Of course this is not an attack on my cushitic brothers,I just wanted to point out the facts as such mistakes could lead to dilution of history in the long run.
Merci de mettre l’or logique en route..
Le seul couchitique francophone c'est Djiboutian est-ce que je suis tort. 😂😂😂
WHY WOULD THEY BE ARAB IF THEY DONT LOOK ARAB
They have cushitic look but assimilated into Arab culture such as Sudanese Arabs
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 Somalis don’t have Arab culture, we share Islam which is not culture.
Bro, You're 80% off on your research. Furthermore, the Somalis in the contemporary pictures you're displaying aren't pure Somalis. Not all of them are true cushites, the majority are well known or famous half-Somalis and half-White or half-Arab. Therefore, I'm not sure what you're attempting to prove here. Do your research thoroughly before uploading inaccurate data.
Name the points that you think am wrong if your can debate
And who cares if there half somali half white or Arab ave found those pictures on Pinterest written underneath the Pinterest pic Somali girls soo how do you expect me to know their biographies of mixed ancestry while am searching for a thumnail picture and to be honest ave come across lighter skinned pure Somali women who look exactly like that.
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 To begin with, you and I cannot even debate about what Somalis are since I’m Somali and you are not. And If I may correct you, the Somali people have existed for thousands of years, well before the historical period of North Africas you’ve mentioned, dating back to the era of the ancient Egyptians. Have you thought about the possibility that the individuals you stated who got together and then ‘paw’💥 like a big bang from which Somalis emerged if they are actually from Cushities? excluding Niloties. rather than the other way around? You have obviously not done enough research on that.
Secondly, you should have a professional representative from the country whose pictures you want to display, rather than visiting Pinterest to discover some incorrect images.
Modern Somalis are particularly difficult to understand due of their extreme diversity. For instance, throughout the last centuries and even more recently, people from Persia, South and West Asia, and crazy as it may seem even Chinese and Portuguese have been to the Horn of Africa(Somalia). (Btw Vasco Da Gama's son Cristóvão da Gama, who was murdered in 1542, is buried in Somalia.) so, as a result, Somalis are diverse. This explains why some have fair skin, some have dark skin and straight hair, and some even have that Chinese look. But that is only a surface-level mixture. there are also pure Somalis too. While some Somali girls do have fair complexion, most Somali women prefer to seem lighter or fairer, thus they often bleach their skin to give the appearance you see. To be honest, though, some of the older photos are authentic Somalis.
@@yassinosman7346I understand what you're saying and only a small percentage of the Somali population could really count as mixed race and those are the mostly light-skinned ones who have ancestors from Yemen
Somalis are way blacker and more African in appearance than the pictures you chose. Go watch some videos from Mogadishu or Hargeisa with people just walking around. They don't look like your selected pictures which cherry picked more lighter skin ambiguous looking Somalis. Your average Somali aint get confused for anything other than black African. @h.u.m.a.n.s476
Where is land punt of Somalia
The North East half of Somalia
I don't have people in my family who look like the wyte looking tureg but the other groups definitely
There is a debate that Semetic language actually arised from Africa through the Habesha people. The Habesha you put here are Cushites that started to speak Semetic languages later. This is wrong. There is the D'amat kingdom which is Semetic that was there before the influence of Cush on Habesha. Infact we did have all the religious practices of ancient Egypt and could be the land of Punt they are talking about. I guess that is why they ignore our D'amat empire or that there is absoutely no difference to our civilizaiton with what they call the Saba kingdom because they are the same and it was actually our influence on Arabia. We also dont have that towering thing you talked about that the cushitic people have and have the most ancient form of the Semetic language that is north of us. What I am saying is we are a race on our own and aren't cushite.
Well you're wrong here's why.
When making that video I didn't know anything about the Habeshas except for speaking south semitic languages, but when I started fishing out the origins of the Habeshas as a Yemenite I was very surprised and happy, the origins of Habeshas is the yemenic tribe of Habeshat who when Saba had territories in the Ethiopian highlands settled there, this Habeshat tribe later evolved into the Habesha identity and its clans or subtribes later evolved into actual tribes like Amharas, tigreans and Harares etc, The Habeshas were for a long time ethnic Yemenis but over time through intermirrages or concubinage absorbed the neighbouring cushitic admixure that's why modern Habeshas look in between Yemenite Semitic and Cushites as for the origins of semitic language it comes from the proto Afroasiatic people known as proto Natufians who later evolved into Levant Neolithic Farmers, Iberomerucians and Natufian hunter gatherer and which with other foreign admixure later evolved into Arabs, Egyptians, Levantines, Mesopotamians, Amazigh, Cushites and the Habeshas, and proto Natufians comes from the levant sinai area.
This video is wrong about how the mixing happened but right about East Africans being mixed. First of all lets use logic. Why would farmers from the Middle East migrate into Africa? Especially when you consider that Cushites are nomads and not farmers. It makes more sense for nomads to migrate than farmers. Also why is there more linguistic diversity of the Afro-Asiatic family in East Africa than in the Middle East if the migration was from outside of Africa into Africa? What makes more sense is East African nomadic herders migrated from Africa into Asia and spread the Afro-Asiatic languages and their genes outward than the reverse.
@@JK-xl8lj You are right the owner of this channel is implying that humanity did not start in Africa.
Tutsi are cushitic people who have adopted bantu language but stay with pastoral cushitic culture
True
There just linguistically assimilated same with the Massais of Kenya and Tanzania who are ethnic South cushitic by speak a nilotic language.
Then you’re not Cushitic anymore if you don’t speak a Cushitic language. You speak a Bantu language and probably took on their culture
@@StopTheLiess cushitic means someone who live or has lived in Kush kingdom and speak cushitic language. Tutsi are cushitic people but have lost their cushitic language because they live with Bantu people. Somali, oromo , Sidama, stayed with cushitic people , It is why the have kept the cushitic language. It's easy to loose the language. Tutsi of Rwanda speak Rwanda language, Tutsi of Burundi speak Burundi language, Tutsi- Bahima of Uganda speak uganda language. They are same Tutsi but speak different language because the have lost the Tutsi original language.
The term Caucasian is built on pseudo science. This is from Wikipedia:
-The Caucasus as the origin of humanity and the peak of beauty -
In the eighteenth century, the prevalent view among European scholars was that the human species had its origin in the region of the Caucasus Mountains.[22] This view was based upon the Caucasus being the location for the purported landing point of Noah's Ark - from whom the Bible states that humanity is descended - and the location for the suffering of Prometheus, who in Hesiod's myth had crafted humankind from clay.[22]
In addition, the most beautiful humans were reputed by Europeans to be the stereotypical "Circassian beauties" and the Georgian people; both Georgia and Circassia are in the Caucasus region.[23][22] The "Circassian beauty" stereotype had its roots in the Middle Ages, while the reputation for the attractiveness of the Georgian people was developed by early modern travellers to the region such as Jean Chardin.[22][24]
It’s a pretty good video over all but the Narrator must be careful when saying not related or unrelated. He must understand that he is making an assumption when he says certain groups are not related to each other. Unless you believe all tribes of people came each from a unique creator independently of each other
Every human being is related to one another were all the Descendants of Adam and Eve its just some people share genetic similarities than others
Wel done’ but those people knows!! Who and what they are.. no identity crisis at all!’
Well said this Saturday a video about the cushitic Phenotypic diversity will be out soo stay tuned and let me know your opinions in it's comments.
🤔
5:07 the right person is somali maya jama not ethiopian
My bad I searched Ethiopian man on Pinterest and Viola
But the thing is I can't tell Cushites apart you all look the same and instead of hating each other come together unite have solidarity just like the Arabs do
no problem but i wasnt talking about the women not man@@h.u.m.a.n.s476
most the purest ones look alike such as somali afar beja @@h.u.m.a.n.s476
and adal was in somaliland/djbouti not somalia @@h.u.m.a.n.s476
there is no identity crisis lol very offensive when the people have a clear identity! I could apply the words identity crisis to other groups such as North Africans but a Somali I can spot easily from a mile away!
In the West it's another case where you're identity is the colour of your skin.
And North Africans have no identity crisis there Egyptians there Amazighs and there Arabs where is the identity crisis in that.
The cushites you are showing don't look like the kushites we see on the drawings on the walls. Your work needs a whole lot of research, alot
What Cushites on the Wall am just showing the Cushitic speakers
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476You say ancient egypt is not Black African. Obviously you don't have a sense of time. You think that Kushites were not black. You are confused. There were Black people in India, the Buddah was a Black African. You really need to come out of your box and do more research and stop contradicting yourself and misleading people
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 Egyptologists say Egypt was white, they show us the difference between the dark brown and black drawings and say dark brown and brown images are Egyptian and the black images are Kushite. All those images are black Africans. And you saying Kushites are mix breed, your brain has been white-washed. Stop what you're doing. Who do you think you're doing a favour? What do you think you're proving? Stop it
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 so you're not showing Kushites, you're showing kushitic speakers😏
There are 4 races,black,white,asiatic and brown. Browns are mixed race. Most blacks do not have other race admixture. Most whites have other race admixture and most asiatics have other race admixture. Mixed and admixture are not same thing by the way. The only race that is mixed is browns and they are intermediate types.
False the white is just genes adaptation of colder climates the neolithic ancestors of Europeans were light brown skinned similar to tan southern Europeans who had the genetic adaptation for white skin and got mutated once settled in Northern Europe for centuries and brown skin is not an intermediate skintone as you claim its the normal one coz almost all the ancestors of Europeans, north africans and west asians were brown and those who lived in colder climates got mutated to white that's why in every brown family in North africa or west Asia can have 2 or 3 members who are either white skinned or darker.
quote-
African peoples are the most diverse in the world whether analyzed by
DNA or skeletal or cranial methods. The peoples of the Nile Valley
quote-
Simplistic "race percentage" models are dubious in Africa which has
the highest genetic diversity in the world. That diversity proceeded
from deeper sub-Saharan Africa, to East and N.E. Africa, then to the
rest of the globe. All other populations, including Europeans and
"Middle easterners" carry this diversity which was built into Africa
to begin with. Africans thus don't need any "race mix" to look
different. Their diversity is built-in and supplied the whole globe.
Any returnees or "backflow" to Africa looked like Africans, including
Europeans. (Brace 2005, Hanihara 1996, Holliday 2003).
and quote-
African people have a range of physical variation and don't need
inspiration or mixes from cold-climate/light skinned Europeans or
Asiatics to explain why. Features like narrow noses, thin lips, height
etc are all indigenous to Africa. Africa has both the highest
phenotypic diversity and the highest genetic diversity in the world
and don’t need cold-climate/light skin inspiration for that
established fact. All cold-climate/light skinned Europeans and
Asiatics are SUBSETS of original African diversity. Modern DNA studies
find even though some African peoples look different, they are
genetically related through the PN2 transition clade of the
Y-chromosome. Thus light-skinned African Libyans and dark-skinned
Zulus are all genetically related Africans, even though they don't
look exactly the same. (Keita 2004; Tishkoff 2002, Ely et al, 2006,
Stevanovitch 2004)
proto nilotic theory is false some cushitic mixed a bit with them while they were in the nile but not all and cushitic originated along the red sea and moved in to egypt and sudan and went back into the horn and kenya while some cushitic like the beja still live in egypt and sudan
Nilotes and cushites never mixed. They don’t even speak similar languages, have similar cultures or food. When someone tells you their history you can’t believe it but you can believe things that have no real sources. Btw Yemenis never looked like that back then. Those are Persian features and Persians are the birth of a lot of white ethnic groups, Hindu etc. they came well after the horns. Greeks were the first to come. This natufian group we never heard of until the internet which have no artifacts left today were non existent if you ask me. Persians are not related to Horners they went to war with Axum for land and along with other kingdoms. But Persians are the birth of Europeans and “Asians” mainly Hindu
You have no idea what your talking about all your talking point can be debunked by factual science and anthropological evidences.
The Cushites are a result of Natufians who's modern unmixed descendants are the people found in Socotra, dhofar and mahra provinces and the proto nilotics who's modern unmixed descendants are the mursi people they mixed when the mostly male Natufians started to arrive in the horn and gave rise to the cushitic people who's culture is similar to the socoris and mehris etc their nilotic ancestors are still living a neolithic lifestyle till this day.
And you Persians were the origins of whites is another blatant lie .
The Yemenites look different from the Beduine gulf Arabs who are similar in terms of genetics and your comparing them to Persians out of all people, Yemenites have Yemenid phenotype and look semitic with either brown, olives to pale depending on the tribe not like Persians who look like light skinned indians with gracile features.
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 where are your artifacts and sources that their were contact with random people called Naturian and so on. Their appearance has never changed get over it and stop forcing yourself on people’s history. Learn about your own roots
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 Stio forcing Nilotes on Kushites they don’t share culture, history, looks or even clothing
@StopTheLiess I know a shit load of my roots iven the smallest detail you and Here is a summary of the key archaeological evidence regarding the Natufian culture:
The Natufians were a sedentary hunter-gatherer culture that existed in the Levant region (modern-day Israel, Palestine, Jordan, Lebanon) from around 15,000 to 11,500 years ago, during the Epipaleolithic period. They are considered a key precursor to the development of agriculture and the Neolithic Revolution in the region.
Some of the major archaeological evidence of the Natufians includes:
1. Settlements and Structures:
- Natufian settlements were semi-permanent, with evidence of substantial stone-built houses and structures.
- Excavations have uncovered large, circular or oval stone foundations that likely supported wooden superstructures and roofs.
- These settlements were often situated in caves, rock shelters, or on hilltops, suggesting a more sedentary lifestyle compared to earlier Paleolithic cultures.
2. Tools and Implements:
- The Natufians produced a variety of stone tools, including sickle blades, pestles, grinding stones, and stone axes, indicating the processing of wild grains and other plant materials.
- They also used bone tools, such as harpoons, awls, and needles, which may have been used for fishing, sewing, and other daily tasks.
- The presence of these specialized tools suggests an increasing reliance on the exploitation of wild plant and animal resources.
3. Burials and Cemeteries:
- Natufian burial practices reveal a complex social organization, with evidence of ritual behavior and the beginnings of social stratification.
- Excavations have uncovered Natufian cemeteries, where individuals were buried with a variety of grave goods, such as shells, beads, and animal remains.
- Some burials also show evidence of intentional cranial deformation, which may have been a cultural practice.
4. Art and Symbolic Objects:
- Natufian sites have yielded a range of artistic and symbolic objects, including carved stone and bone sculptures, decorative items such as beads and pendants, and rock art.
- These artifacts suggest the development of symbolic thinking and the beginnings of artistic expression in this culture.
5. Subsistence and Diet:
- The Natufians relied on a broad spectrum of wild plants and animals, including the hunting of gazelle, deer, and other mammals, as well as the gathering of wild cereals and legumes.
- Evidence of the intensified exploitation of wild grasses, such as the presence of sickle blades and grinding stones, indicates a shift towards more intensive plant food processing and the potential beginnings of plant domestication.
The Natufian culture is considered a crucial transition between the Paleolithic and Neolithic periods, as it shows the development of more complex social structures, the beginnings of plant and animal domestication, and the emergence of the first sedentary communities in the Levant region. You want evidence for Natufians here read for your self.
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 where are their LIVE artifacts not these made in stories with no real facts or legitimate sources? You really don’t know about your origins in sure your confusing your origins with other peoples origins.
borena people are oromo you dont have to saparate
Thanks for reminding me I didnt know before
But those in Kenya looks strange like they look different , from the other oromos , other oromos look identical to habesha semetic , some across Kenyan it's border looks darker n different
AHMARA AND TIGRES ARE NOT CUSHITES. THEY ARE SEMITIC
We are a Cushitic, we have beautiful cultures, and we are pure BLACK African. Sub-Saharan African have different shapes and features, and no one looks like others example South Sudanese dont look like Nigerian or South African. Like wise, we have oure own African shape and we are pure BLACK African not mixed
Yes you are mixed every human race is mixed there's no purity no pure race name one race that is pure maybe the andamanese people and Cushites are also mixed-up if not explain why you have semitic features even though your subsaharan and Semites are not subsaharan explain that.
No, we are pure AFRICAN. Keep your colonized thoughts to yourself.
Cushitic African.
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 no we don't have semitic features we have cushitic features even Tutsi in Rwanda they have cushitic features no one is calling them that they have semitic features sorry bro you claiming something that doesn't belong to you
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 "Why you have Semitic features even though your sub-Saharan and Semites are not sub-Saharan explain that. "The chicken or the egg?
Amniotic eggs showed up roughly 340 million or so years ago, and the first 🐔chickens evolving at around 58 thousand years ago at the earliest, it's a safe bet to say the 🥚egg came first. Eggs were around way before chickens even existed.
Btw. the Cushitic are the "eggs" via the 'Out of Africa' theory...proved by your own statement about " maybe the Andamanese people"🤦♂
They look like Caribbean people to me.
No they don't most carribean people are pure west Africans with miner amerindian, European and asian ancestry.
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 You must have never been to the Caribbean, if you say this. Just because you know some Jamaicans in England doesn't meen you know Caribbean people. ruclips.net/video/fAZBLzWCUbU/видео.html
You mean the Kushites? They are black lets not go there AT ALL. 25th Dynasty Kushite Kemet pharoah was described as The Assyrian King Esarhaddon describes Taharqa's captured family as: “His wives, his sons and [his] daughters [who]se bodies like his, have skins as black as asphalt (he counted as booty)" Also, Arabs didn't enter Sudan until the 12th Century after the fall of Christianity!
Good work. And i agree with most statements. But the origin of ancient egyptian and i mean ancient not the hellenistic or roman egypt which came after 400-300bc are a combination of different african groups like cushitic, nilotic, chadic and khoisan in lower egypt (the cultural and politic center) with the ancient north african and descendents of the natufians and some smaller percentage of asiatic groups were also present in upper egypt (the delta). If you are skeptical about this please just compare the different kushitic and chadic hairstyle with the ancient egyptian ones. The reason for those population movements were the climate change in africa with the desertification of the GREEN SAHARA. Which triggered population movement in africa and brought all those different groups together in the nile valley. Also please google if the ancient natufian had any neanderthal admixture which only african group didnt had.
The African groups you mentioned might have contributed to the Ancient Egyptian genome yet the mullato apperence to some Egyptians but their genomic contribution was overshadowed by the neolithic populations that meet in the Egyptian nile and mixed like the Natufians, Anatolian farmers and Zagros farmer the saharra was green at that period and even before the saharra desertification began
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 The groups you were talking about are also mentioned by the ancient egyptian and were called the hyksos (which means foreigner) around 1500 bc. The true originator of ancient egypt where the people of napta playa. Napta playa was a astronomical observatory which was used to watch the same star constellation that the later pyramids also watched. And you can also find similiar observatory in africa like "adams calender" in south africa. I dont deny the contribution of the natufians but there were concentrated more in the delta region then the heart land of egypt. And most genetic study were done in roman & hellenistic eras close to the delta. The most convincing argument for a southward origin is the example of the Legendary Land of Punt also reffered go as "Ta netjer". The land of Gods. Hatshepsut build a temple and also depicted the puntites on them. And they depitected them the same way as they would depicted themselves. And punt clear lays in the horn of africa because of the trade goods which where identified. Ancient egypt will always remain a mystery to people who close of they eyes to the connection to other african societies. But if you compare egyptian culture, gods, hairstyle, music instruments and depictions of themselves to other african groups before 700bc the truth will become undeniably.
3:34 😂 No Son.They speak AfroAsiatic
3:00 No.
I have a close realative that have dna from one of the Pharoah your lies are starting to crumble
I also have east african dna I am Black american your lies are crumbling
You're being ulediotic
Laughable 😂😂
5:40 ancient egypt actually called sub sahara their homeland land of punt. Which was eastern sahel.
Eastern Sahel what do you mean Mauritania
@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 eritrea area, Where the kingdoms of punt, d'mt, axum have been.
@@dedunscrown-js8clactually scientists have proven in a recent study that the Land of Punt was in Somalia, Somali ruled Djibouti, Somali ruled east Ethiopia (Ogaden region aka somali state Ethiopia) and parts of Eritrea (only the afar coast)
@@hassanabdikarimmohamed2505 east african "peoples" was the land of punt. Not just the coast closer to arabia.
@@dedunscrown-js8cl horn of Africa coastal people (Somalia, Somali populated and ruled Djibouti, and Eritrea) was the land of punt... East Africa covers countries like south Sudan Kenya Uganda tannzania which had nothing to do with the ancient coastal Cushitic Afroasiatic tribes of the Horn of Africa where all scholars place the land of Punt