Jordan Peterson Meets Maajid Nawaz | Interview In Full | LBC
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 сен 2024
- Maajid Nawaz sat down with Professor Jordan Peterson for an exclusive LBC interview which covered topics ranging from gender pronouns to being compared to Hitler.
LBC is the home of live debate around news and current affairs. We let you join the conversation and hold politicians to account.
Subscribe for more: l-bc.co/subscribe
Watch More Here:
The Latest Coronavirus Videos: l-bc.co/Covid1...
The Latest Brexit Videos: l-bc.co/Brexit...
The Best Of James O’Brien: l-bc.co/JamesO...
The Best Of Iain Dale: l-bc.co/IainDale
The Latest Donald Trump Videos: l-bc.co/Donald...
Join in the conversation and listen at www.lbc.co.uk/
Sign up to LBC’s weekly newsletter here: l-bc.co/signup
Like, follow and subscribe to LBC!
Website: lbc.co.uk
Facebook: lbc
Twitter: / lbc
Instagram: / lbc
"Women prefer care jobs.... thats not right, actually. Most people in care jobs are women"
This is why I love this guy. So. Incredibly. Careful. And. Specific.
James Fortune that’s why the left is unable to successfully misconstrue Dr. Peterson’s words. And what so naturally occurs is the pathetic and yet feeble attempt of the left to bash and mislabel Peterson as an alt right racist.
It’s not working.... the left is getting weaker
They'll still attempt to misquote him though, look at the state of this:
ruclips.net/video/Jhl5yeZlltI/видео.html
He doesn't say that. He says that there are multiple ways people are oppressed and to blame it ALL on men is a mistake.
Joshua Lopez True
Oners82 Women were not persecuted as Jews and blacks were. They lacked full equality but weren't targeted. This isn't to say that there weren't laws which directly negatively affected women. But a persecuted minority, which is what radical leftist try to make women of the era out to be, is an incorrect notion.
Talk into your mic bro.
It helps if you imagine the microphone is a big steaming bowl of pho. Love your show
😜it's the only time when Magid's congeniality works against him! 😅
FOR REAL!!
thats what i was just thinking!
"I move away from the mic to breathe in"
Isn't it a bit sad that we are actually congratulating them on having a civil discussion about important topics, which should be the norm but isn't.
Odd times we are going through aren't they. They are coming to an end.
It does feel good watching a civil intellectual conversation without someone screaming racist !
Get a woman on the panel and all civility disappears...
Isa I guess the importance of an issue is subjective, though I tend to think policies surrounding freedom of speech, current ideological movements and cultural shift tend to be important.
+Isa: What exactly is that ideology? Could you describe some of its ideological points?
Maajid Nawaz is such a passionate and enjoyable interviewer. Being polite and competent; never too sharky or teethless either. High quality, outbalanced interview! Thanks, man!
I wish he would speak into the microphone !
my favorite part was when he says "so what you're saying is" in reference to every British woman that interviewed him lolll
I think Maajid needs recognition here. Although not politically agreeing with Peterson he gives a fair and balanced interview allowing him to get his point across, something not often seen in British journalism.
Yes i like him sometimes but im very wary of him, he was a radical islamist but now says he's a moderate Muslim? Seems like he's doing taqiyya
You say 'Taqiyya' as if you know what it means. Majid is a Munafiq. He only represents himself and those that have an anti-Islamic agenda.
totally, she made herself look really stupid but I felt a wee bit sorry for her (much as I abhor her interview technique) as I think she had more of a point than she was capable of getting across. I'd be interested to see how she might talk to him off camera as he very clearly made her think...
@@jagoman85 what is anti islamic agenda is it people who don't want sharia ?
I think he especially deserves credit for the end of the interview, he asks about something he has strong feelings on, and resitsts interupting the guest on his show.
More I watch of Jordan Peterson more I am bemused why he is sometimes called controversial. Nearly everything he says is just common sense.
You're right, it is common sense, except for those who are hard of thinking. Look at some of the comments and you'll see that this is the case. There are none so closed than those who maintain one stance throughout their lives. Are they happy this way? Yes but they will never realise their real potential and it is this that also makes them cowards to some degree. Minds which are still do no favours to the head they inhabit.
This is why the Left have shot themselves in the foot. As usual they try to trash the reputation of anyone they think doesn't agree with their philosophy. The more people see that Jordan is not what the Left have tried to portray him, the more the Left look stupid and lacking in credibility.
Because in this era of insanity, everything common sense is controversial, this is how the SATAN works. You say there are TWO GENDERS, this is controversial. You say, men are stronger and taller than women, this is controversial. You say men earn more because they more often take the riskier, more boring, less flexible, dirtier, less social, more technical, longer hour jobs (all of which are scientifically proven), and this is controversial. You say, gays and lesbians have a life expectancy far lower than straight people and this is controversial. You see, everything common sense and scientific are controversial to these people!
That's right Robert Bolder. Common sense has not been heard enough for quite some time. That's why it sounds so astonishing. It is exactly what I thought when hearing Jordan. It's common sense. But the Marxists have taken control of speech & thought by their actions. They invented Political Correctness to control speech. We are now pushing back & Jordan is the start.
Ah but the fact that people have different common senses it where the confrontation comes from. But most people haven't thought about what should be common sense as much as jordan has to begin with.
Asking questions and listening to the answers is a far better way to conduct an interview than judging people with preconceived ideas about them ( James O'Brien, cathy newman are you listening ) well done maajid.
The left haven't a clue how to do this.
Oners82
No, it's because you don't listen to any other viewpoint. It's because you're militant and aggressive and lack basic manners and courtesies. It's because you respect only ideology and not people. You don't even have the brains to stay on topic with this thread, which is about asking questions and listening to people, NOT about the ideas being debated.
The left's idea of debate is smashing people over the head with bike locks and shutting down any speakers you dont agree with using violence. The greatest centers of circle-jerk currently on the planet are the universities which are soley in the grip of far-left politics and which shit out far-left drones by the bucket load every year.
And the lies you tell, the divisive identity politics, the re-writing of history to con the following generations into your narrative, the ideology itself which has led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people over the last 100 years and yet you ignore, you are the enemy of the free world and of the future progress of mankind. The sooner we are shut of you and your ilk, the better.
Oners82 It's not like Peterson's ideas weren't explored in this interview.
Antagonism has no place in an interview. Why would you even want an on-the-spot opinion? It has no genuine thought behind it.
I know why you'd want it: you'd want it in the hope they fuck up and say something which can be misconstrued as offensive or inappropriate if you cut it right.
(When I say you, I don't mean you, Oners, I mean the hypothetical person who would seek Newmanist antagonism in interviews)
Joshua: yes, the type of interviewer whose only objective is to catch you out because they assume bad faith in the interviewee - that s/he is really a charlatan.
t s Those two names you listed should have been sacked
"So what you're saying is..." and they laugh. I just got the joke by watching this interview for the second time.
Calm, logical discussion. Refreshing.
Jeffrey Rust I agree. This is what society needs.
What happened to this anyway?
Very refreshing. I have one question. How does one get a job as a broadcaster And not know to speak INTO the mic and not past it!!
It’s nice that a technical issue was the only down part of the video.
LBC should be commended for allowing JP to speak openly despite the current smear campaigns against him. Maajid is someone who is able to interview a guest in a diligent and probing manner, in stark contrast to Cathy Newman.
Great interview. Respect and listening to each other. Maajid's comment at the and about "we're having this conversation" really is a positive upbeat way to both describe and end the interview. well done.
Fantastic interview. Incredibly professional. Thank you for asking and not interpreting and straw manning. This is how it should go.
Comix Villain Agreed. Excellent interviewer
I find it funny because his best interviews that I have seen so far have been with men😂😂
Wow, I had forgotten what a professional interview looks like. Thank you Maajid.
Keyword: looks
Not really professional when he doesn't know what the microphone is for.
JP is so careful with his words.
I wish people would think more before speaking.
Yes it's awesome , remember he also says you take the risk to offend someone.
yeah bc he's lying
I wish more people would think while listening to him
As if on cue - they will always be someone to prove you're correct, eh Dream State? XD
It doesn’t matter how much careful you are with your words, d left will eventually get you. They got Jesus!
What I like about Majid is that his willingness to listen to another viewpoint and perhaps learn from it. Even if it goes against his religious teachings he listens and you can see him sublty perhaps incorporating that into his way of thinking. Such a progressive man
maajid is a great interviewer, a true liberal.
i strangely found it comforting seeing maajid was drifting away from the mic. It shows he was truly engaged in the conversation, not just an egomaniac presenting his own propaganda show like james obrien
Daddy Dana: Great comment and it's so true. Pfft!..Don't get me started on James 'Gaslighting' O Brien: Yes,as you say he's an egomaniac and also a propagandist, but it's his Gaslighting technique with callers who disagree with him that(to me) is his most hateful trait that nobody ever talks about: If you don't know what 'Gaslighting' is, just Wiki it,read the first sentence and tell me if that doesn't describe that lunatic O Brien's interview technique....perfectly!
Or maybe he doesnt understand how the mic works...
does maajid really believe that about gender reassignment surgery? sauce pls.
And i somewhat agree it is Polands (or any other european countries) moral responsibility to take in 'refugees'. However it's not a moral obligation.
What is 'morally correct' for a nation to do is not always good for the native population. The foremost moral obligation a state has is to protect its own people.
I'd like to hear how he phrased those two arguments.
Daddy Dana I don't know why James obrien gets to interview people when he's useless at it and universally despised
White Void no
This is how journalism should be conducted, BBC should be like this.
Suzy Siviter CBC too!
The BBC, many years ago, used to have meaningful one to one conversations on TV. Now you can only find these excellent chats and lectures on RUclips..
This is how journalism should be worldwide
I heard a recent BBC radio 3 interview with JBP in which the interviewer was determined to be Devil's advocate and try to heat things up with constant interrupting. This LBC is a much better interview.
@@martynhunter3542 The BBC, like nearly all the MSM, has been lost to the left for years.
Very sad to see.
As a 55 yo I never thought I come round to considering if the £ 3.8 BILLION the BBC gets from the licence payer should be stopped.
The organisation needs completely overhauling from the top downwards and return to being impartial and educational and completely drop the fallacy of being "Progressive"
“Maajid, grab that thing and put it about a fist away from your face!!!” - Joe
sucker*
Damn straight Joe Rogan had to tell him several times in the podcast
Hunter Cox lololol
"Pull that sucker right up to your face. Yeah, like that." - Joe Rogan
The interviewer was brilliant here. No agenda, just happy to ask brilliant questions.
My great grandmother had 20 kids. 10 died.
This was like a real conversation instead of the interrogation I usually dread.
Seen a lot of Jordan's interviews and had never heard of LBC. Have to say I was really impressed with Maajid's interview style and nice to see someone listen and explore ideas rather than be combative for the sake of being combative. If you see this comment Maajid thank you for showing that there are members of the media that converse like human beings, respect.
Connor1992wes if you care about UK politics LBC is one of the best radio stations
Connor1992wes watch all his interviews on the JRE podcast. Joe is good at asking questions and the one with Peterson and Bret Weinstein is great.
LBC is credible....great interviewers all round.
Maajid's a good dude, he and Jordan are both fighting good fights
"Now I have come to a crossroads in my life.
I always knew what the right path was. Without exception, I knew. But I never took it.
You know why?
IT WAS TOO DAMN HARD!!! " (Al Pacino's speech in Scent of a Woman)
Professor Peterson is so appealing to young men because he inspires them to take a hard way, a path of principle that leads to character.
He inspires them to step into the Forge, to face the Crucible.
To pick up their Cross, and carry it, endure it and in the process try to be a better person.
Now this is a man of Western culture.
A truly admirable gentleman
Now where else does strength come from? Not sitting on your iPhone all day. U see so many manlets today 18 year old with no biceps long and lanky..
I've read through hundreds of comments on this thread and this is by far my favourite. Very well put! 👏👏👏
Well, that is one of the most informative and enjoyable discussions I have ever listened too. I am an old Scottish guy (lapsed protestant) and kind of centre left in my beliefs. I totally got the argument for individual sovereignty overriding religion, race and social categorisation. Thank you to Jordan and Maajid.
I'm a centre left aussie. Can't believe people paint this bloke as a far right figurehead. He just seems like he genuinely wants to help people. Though, I don't agree with his carnivore only diet, lol.
@@aidanm5578 he has to eat the way he does to keep his health.
It was when JP still made sense, one of the last instances of him doing so. How he has changed. Once articulate, cogent and a proponent of common sense, he is different individual these days. Watching the video above there is no hint of the polemicist and apologist for the right wing fundamentalists from whom he now draws his income. His recent emotional outbursts against everything he perceives as an ideological threat to conservatism, fundamentalism even, are a far cry from the JP we see above. I am not sure what happened, but he is no longer working in academia and seems to draw an income from his on line presence and his public lectures. Can it really be true that he has literally sold his soul to the right
@@dragosapina5692 yeah. I didn't agree with him fully to begin with but respected some of his perspectives, but he's fallen a long way to a hard right polemicist online now
@@windywindmill98 Following him lately, or at least keeping up with news about him, I now wonder whether it is accurate to say that he has 'fallen' at all. I was inclined to be more defensive of him previously as I thought many of his critics were putting words in his mouth and accusing him of attitudes and sentiments he simply did not demonstrate. It seemed to me people were to ready to make assumptions about him based on preconceptions only, and not based on anything he had actually said - yet. The incompetents and prejudice of some of his early critics gave him more credibility than he deserved though. He wrote a self help book, which genuinely seemed to strike a cord with many people. However as laudable as that may be, even in that instance he wasn't exactly unique or especially insightful in his advice - not to the extent that justified him becoming the guru figure he seemed to become. He never had the gravitas to match his aspirations and intellectual pretensions, however, and while its possible the intention he received turned his pretensions into actual delusions. What is extraordinary though is his anger and lack of ability to engage in any rational discussion. He is clearly far from the philosopher he seems to believe himself to be, but he seems to also think he is a wit of Wildean proportions yet his retorts to his critics seem to be increasingly schoolyard in character. There are those who see his contortions of logic and abuse of a thesaurus as impressive, but more because of the sentiments he expresses rather than the strength of his arguments, but you get the sense that those people believe anyone who has read a book is an intellectual. Is he an actual idiot, or is he severely unwell? Dont know. He is not a sage, philosopher or a reliable authority on anything anymore - not even on the field of psychology - so divorced from reality has he become.
Two great minds at work! After having watched countless J.P videos i must say Maajid is so far the best at "moderating" Jordan. Jordan is by this point so used to delivering his message that he tends to repeat much of the same things. But here Maajid both manages to extract some deeper explenations that Jordan often forgets to include, and also is not afraid to interrupt Jordan mid ramble where needed. Good work, great interview!
TheHitchHiker spot on. Not a fan of Majid but completely agree
Good point!
Maajid, come up on the mic
I missed some of his half of the conversation because he kept drifting away from the Mic.....
ditto
I had to keep shifting the volume depending on who was speaking
I cringed when Joe made that comment, it was like he didn't realise Majid does a radio show just like him...but yeah I guess Majid does need to be told to speak directly into the mic not 30cm to the side of it :)
Samurai Canks “Eat the mic” someone once told me. Unless you’re singing, then distance control is important.
Honestly, it seems like people try to make Dr. Peterson into some caricature of an old, paranoid, angry man who's not ready for the revolutionary shift(which isn't coming, by the way). If they just took the time to listen, really listen, they'd realize that he's entirely sensible, very empathetic, intelligent and well spoken individual.
yes this thank you
See opinion I don't like that I disagree with emotionally. Mischaracterize. Over emphasize already addressed statements that are retracted or has added context that is ignored. Labeling. Article written, "associated with the alt-right". Wikipedia article edited, "associated with the alt-right by (insert corporate news sources here). CANCEL. GUILT SUPPORTERS BY ASSOCIATION. GUILT SPONSORS. Deplatformed. Rinse and repeat. Don't blame yourself, they prey upon the human need to understand something quickly with a buzzword and many whose opinions are not black or white are seriously hurt by flawed interpretations.
If everyone thought with the same intensity and compassion yet firm logic as Jordan peterson the world would be at peace.
But why is he so overrated?
Maryam Kim hi Maryam..... I just replied to one of your previous comments where you called him banal and Common sense, now you are calling him over rated on somebody else’s comment. You have also commented elsewhere berating him, which is your prerogative.... however all of your comments are personal attacks and do not seek to question or pull apart his arguments. You therefore do not seem to be adding anything to the conversation other than trying to figure out for yourself why people “rate him”. Even in this comment you have totally mischaracterised what the person is saying by boiling it down to then overrating him. Please do say something useful and make the debate interesting. Peace and love
This is THE best Jordan Peterson interview I have ever seen. Excellent job by Maajid... Just remember to talk directly into the microphone in future 🤣
I've been scrolling down the comments to see if anybody else noticed that Mr. Nawaz kept getting further and further away from his microphone. The entire interview was very professional and enlightening but just to suggest to Mr. Nawaz that some of the listeners might not have been able to hear his questions as well as if he had spoken directly into his microphone.
One of the most constructive journalistic interviews with JP that I’ve seen.
Yes, Newman was fun to watch, but I didn’t learn anything beyond the fact she’s an incompetent egotist.
And that she's a Crazy Left Wing Lunatic.
thats not true, i also found out that I feel sorry for the guy that married her as well, can you imagine that household.
And a toxic feminist.
shes just doing her job...give her a break
@Iain Mckenna
"shes just doing her job...give her a break"
She needs to be given a permanent break
"You shouldnt throw around insults like this (hitler) because it dilutes the currency of that person?" How true can a statement possibly be
I think that is also true when it comes to discrediting Muslims from their views by accusing of ' Tuqyia ', which only exist in Jihadists' and dogmatic Islam critics' minds.
Dilutes the currency of the comparison.
it dilutes the currency of comparison, listen properly.
In what sort of insane world would it be necessary to even point this out? What sort of boneheads would need to be told such an obvious thing? If I were the state of Israel or one of the major Jewish organizations in the United States, for instance, I would be tempted to sue people who do this for insulting the memory of the Jews murdered by the Nazis. Come to think of it, the Romani, the Poles, and many other ethnic groups would also have good reason to be outraged.
I am transgendered and find myself bored with the raft of identity politics of self-defined profiles. My approach is to state directly, "I am female" regardless of what clothing I wear, what my voice sounds like. And to buffer any faux-pas gender terms applied to me, as simple human action. I don't want anyone to feel like they are sitting next to a hand-grenade of outrage, my life is about being human.
"hand-grenade of outrage" I really like that. I'm tempted to steal it.
My daughter is gay and it was very hard for her to find a partner who isn't a postmodernist neo-marxist Third Wave feminist. She told me she found them creepy. Luckily she is now in a relationship with a traditional Chinese girl who shares the same views and they both can get on with their lives as people.
Thank you
Amazing that we have to congratulate you on what should be a normal attitude! From the outside I've always thought if I were gay/trans and that's all I was defined by in society, I'd be fucking fuming; I'm an individual and more than the label you are trying to tag me with.
A Z Society can be horrible but that gives us the opportunity to counter it with a human attitude.
Great interviewing - loved this discussion - shame it wasn’t longer!
Thiomas Sowell looked into a statement that male doctors made a lot more than female doctors. He found out that the male doctors worked up to 500 more hours.
J Kay Thomas Sowell is awesome
J Kay
Funny you say that....ironically both my parents work in manufacturing, not only do they havr the same job but work in the same building and have same positions (plant managers)
Both make 80,000 a year base salary, but my dad far exceeds my mother her whole life due to 2 main reasons. 10 hours OT weekly for many years and never calling in sick no matter how sick he was.
My mother essentislly has no paid sick time end of year while my father accumulated 12 weeks sick and had bern maxed out.
This is nothing but personal anedote but men are willing to just irrationally work harder even if it means hindering ones health.
My mother rather work less, use her paid sick time every year and spend time with me (her son) going shopping or heading to NYC for the day window shopping n eating at resturants. Just normal mother son time back when i was in middle/highschool.
But my mother is 100% more healthier than my father now due to that main reason. Which is why men die younger than women
Thomas Sowell has been dropping Truth Bombs longer than I have been alive (I am 40). Also why you never see him anymore, leftist rather debate knuckle heads they can easily straw man.
ikr
Those pesky facts researched by geniuses...
The words 'forced re-education' really gave me chills.
Orwell.. animal farm... they take the sheep away and make them repeat a new and changed chant, four legs bad two legs good...
Olwen S AGREE
Just like what's happening in China.
Learn to think for yourselves.
rough slugger Animal Farm is fantastic, if you haven’t already read The Gulag Archipelago I cannot recommend it enough.
When your so engrossed in the conversation you forget your doing a radio show.
yeah Maajid forgets he needs to talk into the mic :/
Yeah just here 29:29
Shastflame Arashi I totally agree, the debate is so interesting you completely focus on what is being said.
*you're. When you start a sentence with "when" and don't finish it, fill it full of bad grammar all because you're too busy trying to get a silly thumbs up on social media (here I'll finish my when sentence), then you look a plank.
@@MeeHandle calm down you the grammar police or something
Very interesting. Very informative. Very thought provoking. Excellent interview and discussion.
Wow you are so easy to impress 🙄.
@@carlplz00001 yes
Majid is so engaged he's leaning towards Peterson, completely forgetting his mic 🤣 Great interview!
Did my head in tbh
😂😂😂😂
@@shanginadildo it would for someone like you
@@jamiesimms7084 Jamie Simms got kegged by @John Shaw in school, pass it on
@@MW-pm1kl strange people
Great work Maajid and Prof Peterson. Truly enjoyable conversation between reasonable, thinking individuals.
This was one of the extremely rare professional and sincere interviews ever conducted with Jordan Peterson. Splendid job Maajid, kudos for you ♡
P. S. Keep the mic close to your mouth please 😊
Someone should show the radio host, how his microphone works.
My Mum is a feminist and I dislike her for that. She brought me up with the impression I am the enemy, and I don't think that's been helpful.
Steve Thomas honestly I get exactly where your coming from
It ain't helpful to anyone
Your mother needed psychiatric help.
I am a woman who believes in equal rights for all genders. As per defination of FEMINISM it makes me a feminist.
I have a son.
I hope i have raised him to treat all with respect irrespective of someoes sexual orientation or race.
If she didn't teach you to behave in society and operate with a moral compass then she failed in her role. That's really the core job of a parent, to teach you how to survive. Teaching you to see yourself as a 'problem' isn't teaching you anything but guilt.
secular value nah feminism is to provide equal opportunity and rights for women. It's not for all genders. It was never the purpose of feminism. But that doesn't mean that if you are a feminist that you aren't for the equal rights for all genders. In any case as long as you are for equal rights for everyone and that's what you teach your kids it doesn't really matter.
I love Jordan's use of language, he has such an awesome library of vocab. Love the content also, subscribed.
"he has such an awesome library of vocab" That is pretty much all he got though haha.
@Electro-Cute he has much more than just words. He presents facts that people can understand.
Cathy Newman could learn a thing or two from you Maajid!
360flipmaster So you’re saying women need men to learn from?
Not necessarily, Cathy Newman could even learn from a marsupial.
360flipmaster so you are saying !!!!!!
Are... Are... You.. Mansplaining!!??? 😵
360flipmaster she wouldn't learn being a woman
I wish people on the left would give Jordan Peterson a fair shake. There is nothing radical or incendiary about anything he says...unless of course one is trying to force their ideological agenda upon the masses....then he is an anathema.
As a Canadian, I’m happy that his voice is being heard and he is becoming more and more popular. He is an excellent counter argument to the leftist (approaching totalitarian)Trudeau Liberals....and also the extreme right.
Keep up the good work Jordan
You're right, there's nothing radical about him. He's the same boring reactionary religious fundamentalist we've been hearing for decades. Nothing he says is a challenge to the status quo or power, instead he literally just gives poor justifications for them. Even his self help stuff is the same old garbage you can read in literally all the millions of self help books on the market.
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon ...thank you for giving me an example of what I’m talking about when I’m speaking of the Radical left misrepresenting Jordan Peterson.
I was agreeing with you that he's not radical. He's about as reactionary as they come. I grew up in a very traditional conservative Pentecostal church where women and men were segregated, women covered their heads with kerchiefs, wore dresses past their knees and also weren't allowed to hold any position of power in the church. His views about women are identical to my old pastors and he even uses the same justifications for them. What's radical about that? Nothing.
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon ....have you even heard Peterson speak?...and I’m not talking about an edited interview from VICE. Have you seen the unedited interview with Cathy Newman? You are completely misrepresenting his views on women just like the two interviews I mentioned had done.
As far as religion is concerned...a fundamentalist is the last thing he is. I’ve heard him refer to himself as a nominal Christian.
Yes, I've listened to a lot of his lectures. I've also read 12 rules and Maps of Meaning. Jordan Peterson's rhetorical style involves saying something that's more or less uncontroversially true while at the same time implying something controversial. For instance, Jordan Peterson will make a claim that there are biological differences between men and women which is obviously true. But he'll say it in the context of a conversation of the underrepresentation of women in government which implies what exactly? So how do you respond to this? Either you fall into the trap of arguing against the obviously true statement or you have to guess at what he is implying. In response to which he can accuse you of misrepresenting him.
I don't really care what he calls himself, I care about what his positions and politics are. To me, I can't tell the difference between his views and your average Christian fundamentalist.
Very nice civil discussion.
Yes.
*Triggered* haha sorry had to get that out of my system but yeah you're right
Certainly was a civil and intellectually engaging discussion.
Especially when you compare it to interviews on MSM like the BBC, NBC, CCN etc... which all feel more like a political tribunal with the purpose of grilling a non-PC or non conformist heretic rather than an interview or a debate.
Well yeah because it is all about public spectacle and networks that stir up the most drama and the most heat are the ones everybody is constantly talking about. It's a working system and the networks have no reason to want to change that. The only way out is society finally growing up and embracing the idea of different viewpoints rather than hating upon them or using them to create unnecessary conflict. That goes for most political systems as well. But society growing up? What was the definition of madness again?
Thankyou both common sense and reason is refreshing , the left particularly should learn this
I’d love James O’Brien to interview this guy. I’d love to see how he holds up to James’ incisive interrogation! 😂
Me too! What a debate that would be.
O’Brien knows very well what a far right pandering little disingenuous bigot weasel grifter Peterson actually is, so I’d imagine Peterson wouldn’t take part in that debate.
Love a good non aggressive reasoned debate/conversation.
totally
you mean impotent
Absolutely brilliant interview. I'm glad people like Peterson exist - putting themselves on the line to stand up to radical groups.
Pure BS
@@gerhardgiedrojc991 working 14% more hours translates to 44% more money. I’d like to know what jobs pay increases like that!
Men work in more dangerous jobs and that accounts for increased wages. Women work in jobs that don’t scale. You can’t scale caring for people to 10000 more people like men can in electronics or computing.
Does this guy ever listen to himself?
Dangerous and manual jobs don’t tend to pay that well.
Fishing, the pay can range from abysmal to decent but most younger people I know have been leaving the industry in the last few decades since it didn’t give them a decent and steady income.
Even lorry driving is listed as one of the most dangerous jobs and it pays very poorly.
Logging and forestry. Again not exactly a high paying job. I’m sure you could find a few jobs, perhaps in remote locations or short, seasonal contracts that pay more than the usual but then you have to support yourself for the rest of the year.
@@murph8411
You bring up some interesting points.
I’m also not sure what Peterson meant by the increased earnings comment?
In Canada, most skilled trades jobs pay very well.
These jobs often have overtime & many workers claim Government employment benefits, if unable to work, which amounts to 60% of their usual wages.
Many people from traditional fishing communities worked in the oil industry as it payed much higher than the fishing industry.
I know a few people that worked oil & gas industry for a few years & saved enough to pay for their house in full, no mortgage.
For me, depression made me aimless, not the other way around. Once I got treatment and medication I had drive and passion and desires for my future.
Works both ways it seems
Will it does make sense. If you suffer debilitating depression, to the extent that you wish to take your own life; then you won't want to plan for a future you may not be in...
Holy cow how smart can one man be. This Peterson guy is incredible
You need to get out more mate
@@akhinambiar why's that? Will I find someone like Jordan Peterson outside?
@@evan2173 I don't know you're experience or who you know. But in my experience, I come across a lot of opinionated people, political agenda people, debaters, "big words" people.
I haven't come across much people that tackle arguments with data, not only argue statistics, but constructed system of values that seriously confronts some of our difficult societial problems. Exposing issues accurately then bold enough to stand behind and not wavering. He goes a step further by having solid values that stems from historical and philosophical fields.
I don't know man.. Not just a simple psychologist imo.
i guess what Akbar Nambir Jihad is trying to say it s that if u want to speak with ppl alooot more inteligent than J. Peterson u should ''go out more'' to ur local mosque and chat to your friendly Imam about a peace spreading book.
@@Rexuar i guess what Akbar Nambir Jihad is trying to say it s that if u want to speak with ppl alooot more intelligent than J. Peterson u should ''go out more'' to ur local mosque and chat to your friendly Imam about a peace spreading book.
Big respect to Maajid, he kept it light hearted with his 'so what your saying' kathy Newman joke
Solo Pariah yeah I’ve sat on the fence a bit Re Maajid, thought sometimes he didn’t let people talk; but this interview knocked me off lol. Impressed 👍
@@cavewaller because he is levels below Peterson intellectually he'd look a fool lol
Because he's with someone who can answer him back and won't be spoken down.
@@gc8610 not really the back and forth was quite dynamic and there were times either of them were was genuinely stumped, but mostly because their areas of expertise don't overlap much.
Maajid didn't have a choice, Jordan will chew him up and spit him out
Quality interview, enjoyed this. One of the better interviews with Peterson lately that weren't obvious attempts to trick him into saying something offensive. Subscribed as I suspect I'll enjoy your content more in the future. Good job Maajid
ruclips.net/video/6wWo_cRJLxY/видео.html
This is an amazing conversation everyone should listen to. Even when their views differ, there is a great sense of respect and intellectual integrity between these two. Seems like the reverse of Americas political discourse these days. LOVE from Australia ❤️
MOST MEN KNOW THIS IN THEIR GUT. I have thought this particular statement for such a long time to finally see someone say it is a relief
not just anyone... A well studied psychologist, professor, and a father who loves and is loved by his family.
Completely agree. Every experience you have as an adult male teaches you this. HOWEVER, I circumvent this by dating girls who don't subscribe to this mainstream attitude of "alpha male" hierarchy. That said I don't agree with Peterson that this is normal going forward. It;s normal going backward, but i think our new mission as men is to find a better goal than having the biggest dick and the hottest chick. The same self responsibility onus Peterson talks about is on us, but not to do what I think HE would want us to do.
You seem to have misunderstood. Alpha is relative, women go for men they see as equal to or greater than themselves, you cant circumvent the normal hierarchy, you have your place in it.
Mmmmm... to critique hierarchy is not wish its demise. He has nuanced views on the Bible and psychology but he lumps other schools of thought all together as worthless... it’s not a balanced POV
that man is literally a genius, Amazing. Bravo Mr. Peterson
I've seen Maajid get very vocally overpowering before multiple times. I believe he was sheepish and away from the Mic in this because he was truly being educated and would have no self platform to retaliate, not in a bad way I also believe he was completely fascinated and fixated.
Peterson is a genius that every person should listen to once on a subject before committing to their views. He is pure unadulterated factual evidence
@@wigoutwigout maajid is the interviewer? I just dont think he realized he was moving away from the mic and that people were gonna have a hard time hearing him
This man is not a genius. He just reads and talks. Nothing special. Think for yourself.
Just seen this. Fantastic interview
Young woman listen too!
:P
No they don't! Lol
Spread the word sister!
😘
Yep! I am female and I have been listening to Dr Peterson for two years- from before he was well known.
Love LBC these days. Good work Maajid
Majid is so passionate about having a valuable and meaningful discussion with Jordan, that he is forgetting to use the microphone! This is GREAT content! Riveting!
I'd say rabbit in the headlights because he can't beat him in debate just my opinion.
@@edmundblackaddercoc8522 He doesn't really seem to be trying to win a debate. Just providing an excellent interview.
Jordan shouting can't hear presenter, how many years experience does he have.
Got to sign. Off, Impossible to hear questioned
@Andrew Holcrft explain?
Great interview, BUT ... Maajid, you gotta work on your microphone technique, youre barley audible is some parts
Every time I listen to Peterson, I realize he is a level above even bright people. The man is brilliant.
yes.He is brilliant.
And also a horrible person. And beeing so smart, it is very hard for the average joe to spot his fallacies , so he is terrible dangerous ...
@Petrit Takeashit it is funny how peterson's fans can't raise above the personal level, always seeking an ad hominem as their argument ...
Again, I did not spoke about me, so I cannnot see where " i was putting myself above others "...
1 second ago
@speedy. You have thrown your opinion in here that JP is a "horrible person." But you have in no way produced any evidence or reasoning for that statement. Nor why you consider him "terribly dangerous." And because he is so precise with his speech is the reason that the "average Joe" can understand him. You, on the other hand, seem unable to. Which perhaps makes you less than the "average Joe"? And without myself wishing to be seen as a member of the "Grammer Police" your, Shall we call them, typos would cause most people to draw the same conclusion as I. May I suggest you try proofreading your words before posting them? Then you might change your pseudonym to "slowly".
5 minutes into the video and he is allready speaking non-sense.
@Ivan Amassivedump And what you said says more about you than speedy : "Jordan is right. So, if you disagree with him, you have a problem." Basically you are looking for something to dismiss the opposing view with an ad hominem fallacy. Jordan Peterson, is OBJECTIVELY wrong about many things like EVERY OTHER HUMAN. and I've noticed that his followers are allmost making a personality cult around him. For example, there's no post-modern neo-maxism, that doesn't and can't exist as postmodernism and marxism are very different.
Great to see an interviewer who actually ask what Peterson means, instead of assuming what he means.
Maajid "I will speak towards anything, but the mic" Nawaz
How frustrating is it? I would like to imagine he knows how to do it by now.
Seriously irritating me
A balanced and respectful interview. Both men are intelligent, articulate and debate in a mature manner. Great stuff.
JP is very disturbed due to years of depression. It's a shame really as he is now so wrapped up in his delusion his entire life revolves around it.
@@paintspot1509 Lol…yea ok there sport. Send me the bill for your co-pay counseling appointment because you need it and badly.
This was an extremely productive conversation and I hope you guys meet again in the future. This beats the hell out of Peterson crushing cans like Dyson all day.
This comment made my day. Cheers.
Those can be fun, TBH.
Though, more of these and less of those would be a good thing
The munk thing was a farce, I get the impression JBP or Fry for that matter, were mislead a bit of the content of that dumpster fire. The lefty idiots were just going bCk and forth about how oppressed each of their groups are. A few personal character attacks thrown in to spice it up. They never even bothered addressing PC at all, and just ended up with an example of why PC culture is a shit idea.
I thought the girl did a lot better job than Dyson but I wasn't paying full attention so I'm not quite sure. Dyson just talked so much, the whole time it seemed like, to say one thing, "I am (a part of) a group that has been oppressed." I put the "(a part of)" because he doesn't really see himself as being a member of a group, he sees himself as that group, period, and every other group that he is a part of. And then once asked to explain his point (not even prove it, just explain what he meant more concisely) he just said, "you can't possibly understand what it's like to be seen as a group, not an individual, because you're white and white is never seen as just a group." The issues that they're (the left) chasing are the exact issues they're creating, this is the issue with talking about this whole "debate," they are basically just creating an uncatchable, ununderstandable fight that they're trying to "win" and you have to accomadate them and their opinions even though they don't have to show actual data/proof.
One thing that I've recently thought of was that instead of political differences, at least today in America, being linear i.e. left, right, etc. its more like a horseshoe. the extremes are closer to the extreme opposite than the middle. Ex. Identity politics is the center of both the extreme left and extreme right, most of their points are the exact same but for different people basically. This is only a new thought I've been experimenting with though so it's probably a whole lot worse than it seems in my head.
Munk Debate in a nutshell:
Peterson: ideas, facts
Fry: ideas, facts
Dyson: race, blacks
Goldberg: women, oppresion
Maajid use the mic please, you're litteraly talking in a different direction and its audibly noticable
You have to blame the producer for Maajid being unheard by not speaking in to his microphone. Why didn't the producer tell him. It's one of the jobs of the producer for goodness sake.
Preach it dude
You have to blame the speaker if he is otherwise a seasoned professional. How many years does a person need to be in such a profession and not understand how a microphone works?
@@mikebetts2046 I don't think he's used to having to compete with someone barking loudly one inch from the mic. It doesn't matter which, but one of them needs to adjust their proximity to the mic, so that they are equidistant, since we can adjust our volumes just fine; either Maajid sits closer (and we lower the volume) or Jordan sits back (and we raise it). Personally, I think Jordan should relax rather than forcing Maajid to lean in. But that's a metaphor for a deeper conversation about western civilization than this one.
Wtf? Tell me what is normal today? Everything is almost complete screwed up! This(interview) is not sad this is an enlightenment to hear now a days, if anything!
This comment thread is not related to the content of the interview, but rather on the technical aspects of it. A professional in the industry of speaking to and with guests for an on-air broadcast should see to it that both can be heard properly.
WHY have a microphone only to turn away from it while talking? the levels are off and every response sounds like he's shouting?!
Exactly! A rookie mistake, though I doubt Maajid Nawaz is a rookie. WTF?!?!?!?
How does someone make it to adulthood, let alone get to interview Jordan Peterson, without understanding how a microphone works?
I had to stop watching 12:20 in because of this dumbass host who can't talk into the microphone.
I think he simply was drawn into Jordan Peterson's presence and lost his sense of surroundings only to focus on solely Peterson. A magnanimous man for sure so can you blame him for losing his composure?
bizarro that the host was the one struggling with the mic situation (jbp is just a pro at this point i guess)
This was a masterclass in professional journalism, Maajid. Well done.
You clearly did your homework researching for this. And you managed to give Jordan time to clearly lay out his stances on issues, as well as asking him questions that challenged them - and all without the kind of trick questions many journalists resort to when interviewing Peterson.
Any intelligent question asked of jordan peterson is a trick question, the guy is rife with contradictions. I mean, Joe rogan poked a huge hole in the guy, and rogan is a joke to begin with.
This is the best video I've seen with Peterson. And Mr. Nawas was an absolute delight. I commend him in the facilitation of this conversation.
Margaret Swartz me too! I’m in awe! Mr. nawaz was articulate and intelligent! He allowed JP to respond without cutting him off, and wasn’t condescending to him! A delightful dialogue-)
What a thoroughly civil, informative and enjoyable interview. Maajid Nawaz has shown the BBC, ITV, SKY and C4 how it should be done, indeed, how it USED to be done several decades ago before the MSM fell into the grip of the leftists.
Angus McAngus leftists lol you literally don’t understand the MSM then.
@@Satorotas89 How about you providing us with an explanation then?
C4 news is pretty good imo especially when it Krishnan doing the interview
Angus McAngus sorry for the late reply, it’s not my responsibility for you to be aware of the string pullers I’m afraid, and there’s quite a few of those to detail. To get you started, look at the Rona Fairhead situation at the (now abolished) BBC trust, former HSBC (aka the worlds most corrupt bank) exec, friend of George Osborne & personal choice for the role of David Cameron. BBC reporting has been further and further to the right since, as numerous studies have shown. Can’t paste links, but there are several academic studies which you can easily find on google and the IEA produced one back in 2017, although I struggle to trust the IEA personally.
As for the ‘MSM’ you mention, the ownership of print and TV media is divided largely between Murdoch, Rothemere and the Barclay brothers, all hyper conservative right wing agenda pushing media barons, your statement is a non starter and comes with zero evidence.
Just to be clear, rather than whinging like you are, it is much better to understand where the money comes from and arm yourself with the knowledge of bias, which will exist in every media outlet, whether private or public. I hope that makes sense! Cheers.
@@Satorotas89 brilliantly put, the UK’s MSMs are either owned by right wing Americans, (the daily mail, the sun etc) or left wing Russians (the guardian, the independent).
I'm aware that Jordan suffers from some emotional wellbeing difficulties... i hope he realises how important and reassuring his thinking and words are :)
Commissar Corbynov imagine knowing as much as this man knows, beyond the regular man. I can’t imagine having such terrible knowledge.
Pommie bears For sure! It’s a lot to take on
@@soundwavesuperior6761
probably how you deliver the message
"more so some of us who can see into the future and are saddened by the fact that the world is being destroyed."
this sentence alone shows you are an idiot, ill subscribe some you tube links to make you feel better
@@stephencoveney4269 get over yourself bud
How's the Kool-Aid?
Great interview, not enough ads though. I only got interrupted every couple of minutes which made it very difficult to reach a state of ultimate rage.
Use the Brave browser, it's free, and they have a mobile version as well as PC version. It stops ads, no more interruptions, my friend :)
I am female, I like what Jordan Peterson says. Not only young men like him.
Same here I love him
It’s nice to hear that Grace, Jordan says himself that he would like more women to listen to him, although he admits a higher proportion of his advice is more suitable to men
💕 JP
same. female here and I agree with almost everything he has to say. he is a very rational and logical thinker.
Stupidity knows no gender obviously.
That, was one very interesting and well constructed interview. Jordan Peterson is deeply engaging, and thought provoking. With the exception of the arrogant half-wit James O Brian, LBC are putting out some quality content.
Andy Satch eeeeveryone hates James Obrien. Sack him Lbc
God, James O'Brien is absolutely jank.
I have no time for Shelagh, she's horrible. A genuine sounding bloke called her the other day saying there are too many people in the country and stressed that he didn't care what colour or race they were, there were just too many. She snapped "you want this to be about race don't you!" FFS...
This conversation has given me hope. It's like Peterson has managed to look inside my head and heart, extracted my core beliefs and values and expressed them in a way that I couldn't in a dozen lifetimes. He talks so eloquently and truthfully that for me it borders on an art form. Like a songwriter whose songs totally resonate with you. And Nawaz is an open minded, respectful and excellent interviewer. This is what a gentleman's conversation sounds like. I just hope it doesn't became a thing of the past...
Far Canal, wonderfully said :D
What do you mean by "gentleman's conversation sounds like?" Are u saying women are not capable of having such a conversation?! ...... naah... just kidding - couldn't resist :) and totally agree - well said. Wonder how many men or women breathing right now feel the core and somewhat float in a copmprehensive mind state of your lines......
Doug Miles This made me chuckle 😅
I completely agree and relate to what you are saying. But I'd add that you write far more eloquently than you give yourself credit for btw 👍🏼
Two individuals actually listening to each other. More of this on the internet please.
Not only titanically intelligent, but a genuinely good man. Much to admire in Peterson
FreedomToons I uh-gu-ree with that.
Mmmmm... I think JP is genius level smart but I think he has a relative morality and deals in hyperbole i.e. to critique hierarchy is not wish its demise. Also he has nuanced views on the Bible and psychology but he lumps other schools of thought all together as worthless... he has a lot of helpful things to say but he’s not perfect.
He's useless outside of his field, and people think because he's smart is psychology he's an authority on everything. Postmodern neo-marxism is literally not a thing and something he just made up, also his views on religion are garbage.
Adam... FINALLY!!! Why is the voice of sanity so rare when talking about JP!?
FreedomToons does not make him beyond reproach. He has had enough praise... how about we talk about IDEAS!
Dear producer, stop being terrible at your job. Move the damn camera angles so the mic isn't in their faces, make them hold the microphone to their faces (c'mon Maajid) and stop screwing with the zoom on the cameras, it makes it look terrible and it's irritating. Take the orange tape off the mic stands, too, it's glaring as hell, especially zoomed in. I mean for such a high production budget, the actual production value is really, really, really bad. Maajid can''t even hear how terrible he sounds, because he's not wearing monitoring headphones. Wow. Great talk, though, love these guys.
What this comments section needs is more people mentioning Maajid not talking into the microphone.
opprobriousness because he is supposed to be a professional at his job. Dr Peterson is not a journalist nor an interviewer yet he can somehow grasp the importance of speaking into the microphone.
@@gavincampbell4991 Whoosh.
Gotcha covered
Who's watching this in 2019?
That one dude has terrible Mic technique.
Craaaazy number of adverts, none timed for an opportune moment. Unwatchable.
Mcafee Adblocker is a free, download it, friend, I have just watched the whole show and not ONE single advert....
Maajid asks all the probing questions that Cathy Newman should have asked, but didn't. The result is a very interesting and revealing conversation. Thank you, gents!
Newman knew what the end of the interview was going to look like before it started. She had a list of questions and no intention of asking a follow up one after Peterson replied. The day she dies there will be 'so what you're saying is' jokes doing the rounds.
Indeed, or "What's in it for women?".
One of a precious few interviews with both participants being excellent. If we'll have much more of such things there will be a great hope for humanity.
Really serious dialog, research, analysis and thinking needed on the relations and compatibility in the same physical space of muslim and judeo-christian values.
If answer is positive - great, let's live together in prosperity and peace. If answer is negative - let's live separately in prosperity and PEACE.
Andreas, I see your point. Let's think about it - I guess this somehow is related to a concept of "nation building" when west feels "obliged" to intervene in foreign places in order to "solve" other people's misery. It's on one side, but looks like you mean something of a different nature - intervention in order to defend ourselves from potential (which can become very real) danger coming from other places, which will really destroy the whole concept of living separately but in Peace.
So here we are - it all depends and devil is in details.
IF people can live separately in countries with completely different political, ethical and religious environments AND not threaten each other than it may be a valid option. Supporters of "nation building" will not appreciate this and always demand our interventions in the places where humans are suffering.
With regards to your specific comment if something is inherently evil than this must and inevitably will present danger to us and real long term peace does look like unrealistic. I don't think islam as a religion is though, but have to admit that I know next to nothing about it..... What is clear beyond any doubt that radical islam and radical islamic terrorism definitely belong there.
Dude i kind of see your point but nooo matter what especially with the internet and social media the world is going to become more interconnected and therefore more interdependent. If you have been born into a place where you're on either end of the spectrum, either you can't trust or are brainwashed by the people you literally depend on to survive purely based upon them placing their subjective ideas in the realm of objective facts then no progression can be made internally within those countries let alone internationally. Plus this seems to state that the only difference between nations is belief. If we separated countries based on values how do they each get the resources they require? Pretty sure we've had that exact situation multiple times through history and the only answer almost every nation provides is war.
Well, I think if we discover, based on intellectual reasons, that living together peacefully is not possible, then the smart thing to do is live apart in peace. I don't see why the idea that the societies are incompatible is so inconceivable, certainly there is a lot of evidence to support it. Bad things seem to happen whenever we have come into close proximity with each other.
Great respect for Dr Peterson for his work and knowing how to use a MICROPHONE.
The greatest interview I have ever seen. So pleased I stumbled across it. Congratulations Maajid for staying focussed and fair with your analysis. Jordan Peterson is a fair and unbiased thinker and speaker and it’s rare to see him treated as such.
What I love about Jordan is that he has his rationale backed up by evidence NOT prejudice.
🤣
@@stephenreeds3632 he lies about his "evidence" gIibly and plausibly .
If you fact - check his assertions, they crumble, while he claims the "Science is clear ", when he misinterprets the findings.
Wayyyy too many comments about a mic on here. Not the best technique but I could hear every single word of this great interview.
LBC I am very impressed with Maajid Nawaz's interview style! He seems very sincere, open, intelligent & empathetic. You have gained a sub in me!! BRAVO!
Comment section breakdown:
Mic comments 80%
Credit to both for a rational, thoughtful conversation 19%
Lost feminists 1%
Have a nice day.
Hahaha God I love u guys. Comment section always makes me laugh stay strong.
😂😂😂😂💀💀💀💀
I would count mic comments too in the second category, only that the mic comment category want to be funny.
u take that back.. Or else 100% of the 1%'s kittens will be angry!!! :(
wtf? hahahahah
Your mic is right there my man, its not just for show
You're right. It is just a stand for the LBC logo...
Maajid: that was excellent interview. Good you've managed to keep JBP on point and I am glad you repeated the questions :). JBP is great thinker and I would love to see you talking somewhere with JBP about Islam. It literally made me interested of what ideas and thoughts would come up during that conversation.
why didn't LBC edit the audio before posting this?
So far, the best interview Peterson has had in the UK. Congratulations Maajid - good journalism and great to see someone put a heavy discussion of ideas into the public domain so readily. It's great to see a renaissance of intellectual discourse in the world at the moment. This kind of platform really shows up the mainstream media as being wooly and naive.
Hes just brilliant.
Maajijd Nawaz is an excellent host as well, great video.
Absolute legend isn’t he!
Nice profile photo
LBC needs to get those mics at a different angle from the camera if they're going to make video posts of these broadcasts. Very distracting.
far more people are listening on radio that's probably the best place for sound quality
But like what angle? If the mic needs to be in front of the person, and (assuming the viewer wants to see the persons face) the camera needs to be in front of them too unless they zoom right in you will see the mic, the problem is that maajid is more interested in getting his face on the camera than put his voice on the mic so we can hardly hear him while Peterson is loud .
ME 0020 - no, this video will get a lot more views than the live radio show did. People all over the world will watch/try to listen to this.
well he really shouldn't cause he's got a face for radio lol but this video has what 7k views you only get something like 7$ per 1k views on YT there will be well over 100k people that would have listened to this live and the ad revenue LBC pulls in is far more worthwhile than the pittance they get on here iv'e seen farage live on YT he only manages to pull in maybe 2k people and that's a liberal estimate from what iv'e seen
Good quality lapel mic would do the job.
Enjoying this program, please learn how to use your microphone, its very hard to hear at times
This is only the second peterson interview where he's actually been allowed to talk.
He is not "allowed " to talk, he is invited to talk! And that's what an interview should be like! Thumbs up to Majid's professionalism, he is letting the viewers to concentrate on J.P. personality and views...I do not agree all the time with the professor although I deeply respect him, but, I enjoyed the interview itself!!! Great job Majid!!!
What about the ones on Rogan?
Maajid doesn't normally allow people to talk, in fact, he is a serial interruptor. This interview is almost uniquely different, and frankly, far better.
There's been a few - Femsplaining is a great one. But Joe Rogan as well of course. And what about Sam Harris?
@@BydSteve ben shapiros sunday special too
Jordan states the obvious .. and thats why he is getting publicity in this day and age where the obvious is not very obvious to so many people
maajid. talk into the mic buddy
Now here’s an interviewer who takes his profession seriously. He asks questions to learn more about his guest and, in the process, takes along his audience with the same goal in mind. And that goal is to become more knowledgeable about a person or topic, maybe even spur you on to begin your own journey of enlightenment.
Too many so called interviewers are entertainers first. Their goal is not to gain wisdom and insight but to either be buddies with their ideologue soulmates or to attempt to skewer and belittle those with whom they disagree.
Great job Mr. Nawaz.
Excellent Interview Maajid!!! But remember to talk into the mic.
They need to just get him an omni-directional mic so he doesn't have to worry about where his face is. He is trying to speak directly to Jordan which is very polite but the big ass mic is just in the way.