Your attention to amusement details kill me. The dropdown, the solar panels opening to the music (that was plain beautiful), the approach back to Kerbin... Very well done, sir!
+Hazard-ish As a small suggestion, I would like to see more parts in normal time. You speed up almost everything and it doesn't give people an accurate picture of the actual physics.
Sorry for the wait, everyone. I've been very busy recently and haven't had the time to make videos. Finding the right music also took longer than expected for this one so if anybody has any music suggestions for future videos let me know :)
+Hazard-ish in general audionautix.com is great for KSP music. Its license free too :) Thanks for the nicely edited and fast paced KSP video. Really enjoyable!
+Hazard-ish Check out an artist called "without.directive". He has a lot (if not all) of his music for free download and I wouldn't think that he would be against you using his music if you asked him. Has a very diverse style of mostly instrumental and some with vocals. Not all of it will be what you're looking for, like I said he touches on many different genres. I think he's an unknown artist that deserves a little attention. At the very least give it a listen when you're bored one day :) Can't wait for part 3 Hazard-ish. Your vids are always so fun to watch.
+Hazard-ish I Have A Suggestion For Part 3. Make A Station And Have A Little Probe Come To The Scanner Probe Every So Often To Fetch Extra Resources Or To Pump It Up With Electricity To Scan More! Also, The Station Is Also Made With Another SSTO Around Minmus, So Put One Into Orbit Of Minmus To Make The Station Core Core (Yes, I Meant To Put That) So That It Could Dock With The Other SSTO To Get Back To Kerbin. 1 SSTO Will Be Left In Orbit Of Kerbin While The Other SSTO Will Land On Kerbin And The Other One Will Follow! Think You Can Do That? I Am Sure You Can Expand The Base And Make A Station At The Same Time! ;D
You need to make a tutorial series on SSTOs. I know most of us are very inexperienced on them, and you seem to be quite the expert. Looking forward to the growth on your channel, nice job mate.
There's some trick to it that I don't completely understand. The two lateral docking ports on the center column are what's connected to the two side beams. You can use docking ports as decouplers normally, which doesn't present a problem. The issue is that you can't attach the "port" side of a docking port to something's radial surface; it needs a normal node. After fooling around with the reroot tool for awhile, I can't figure a way to do it. Trying to attach the outer side of a docking port to the I-beam directly just results in the radial attachment node taking precedence. So, even though the port LOOKS like it's attached to the I-beam using its port side, it's flipped around. The best I can come up with is attaching the side beams' end docking port to the center beam's side docking ports in the VAB, and then using the rotate tool to make them appear parallel, even though they're still coupled. Alternatively, you could attach cubic octagonal struts to the side beams in an inconspicuous way, using the move tool to clip it into the I-beam. Then you'd have a node the docking port could connect to. If there's a way to actually attach the outside of the docking port directly to the radial surface of an I-beam, I'd be thrilled to hear about it.
That poor kerbal during reentry. Also, can you imagine sitting in one seat without being able to remove your EVA suit for a 1 month long space flight? Yikes!
Really incredible work. I just found your channel today through your reddit post about stock hinges, and I'm hooked on going through all of these. I'm consistently amazed by your craftsmanship and skill in KSP - extremely well done, and you've definitely earned a new sub.
I've discovered this channel recently. I am really lovin it. The other day I read in the comments that the videos you make have something special, something that makes them really cool. I think that your ideas and how you put them into practice are extremely elegant, and they convey the impression that it couldn't have been executed better. Anyhow, keep the good work up.
Wow, thank you! I love hearing things like this. I do try to make each of my videos interesting - the only problem with that is they can take a while to finish :P
+Michael Easton Thanks! Part 3 will have to wait for a short while since I'm working on another project (that will be uploaded shortly!) but will be much more impressive than this installment :D
hazarish,you deserve SO MANY MORE SUBS.your every epesode is very entertaining, and is well edited.i expected u to have 1 million, but 30k!?! its not bad but wow.EVERYONE! SHARE HIS/HER VIDEOS :D
Didnt expect that dropping the cargo in mid air is also an option ;D But in the latest version I would have expected the kerbal to be burned in the atmosphere ^^ Love your videos, keep up the great work :)
Hazard, you have very neat and clean editing skills. I trade off between you and Scott Manley for content on KSP and find your skill sets pretty equal. I would love to see you combine your speed builds with career mode. This artistic choice would be very fun to watch in career mode and it's high speed pace keeps me engaged even in the house keeping portions. Keep doing great work!
I really want to make a Mun base, but... The science module is... 2.5 Kerbal Units large, and it won't fit in the Mk-3 cargo bays... How do I build a good SSTO that can do it?
+Mastikator 1.1? YES! 1.0.5? Sort of. I'll be sure to mess around with all of the new parts added which is great but, with ships as big as ones I'm working on currently (800+ parts), it's the Unity 5 performance increase that I am looking forward to.
+Hazard-ish I'm gonna love those Vector thrusting engines. On another note, I'm pretty upset about how they are replacing the MK 1 cockpit. In light of this, I had backed up the files for it and plan to release a mod for when the update comes out!
I'm glad people haven't forgotten about it! I've got most of that video finished but I need to do some other videos before I can wrap it up. I am working on it though and it's going to be a good one! :)
you should make a new base using ksp 1.2 , what better way to show off all the new parts and mechanics, plus these vids are orgasmic, i think i became a little aroused when all those solar panels extended ;) and not to mention deploying moon cargo like a boss
+oEQjet Good question, I don't know actually. In retrospect, I probably should have - it would have been a little bit more efficient! Thankfully I still had plenty of fuel at the end though :)
+Hazard-ish Speaking of efficiency, you can alter the periapsis of an hyperbolic orbit by burning radially, being more efficient and less time consuming, than burning retrograde at a high periapsis for capture. As a bonus, the capture at lower altitude and higher speed will be more efficient, thanks to the Oberth-effect. (compared to capture in high orbit and followed by lowering of the orbit to the target altitude)
+Adil Basically at high-altitudes and high-speeds, where you fly through the sphere of influence and don't get captured, you can more efficiently change your periapsis (lowest point of an orbit) by burning towards the planet/moon, 90° offset towards your velocity-vector, instead of directly against your velocity vector. If you now circularize at the lower periapsis you were more efficient (used less fuel) than first circularizing in a high-orbit and then lowering it to the target altitude and circularizing again.
You could make a video teaching how to make these new planes? I really like your videos and think their incredible projects, but I have difficulty in making aircraft and would love it if you make a Video teaching how to assemble them.
Do the upturned wingtips have a function? I usually find I don't need much yaw control, and I would think the best place to put it would be at the center anyway.
+HebaruSan Extra yaw control is never a bad thing! Also, this crafts centre of lift is REALLY far back (as you can probably tell) so any slight maneuvers during scent can result in magnified wobbles.
Yea, a question. Why did you use 4 RAPIERs if you were only going to use 2 of them outside the atmosphere? You could've EASILY placed whiplashes instead of those 2 RAPIERs and save fuel.
+adamsrealm Nope, re-entry heating was on 100% and I never touched the dreaded debug menu. As you can see from my descent profile, I came in at a very shallow angle. I started my third aerobrake at sunrise and landed at the KSC in what is equivalent to the afternoon. In real-life time the final aerobrake and decent took roughly half an hour to complete. This is because I used the 'max delta physics' slider to my advantage by setting the game to calculate the physics at the lowest possible speed. Additionally, the cockpit I used for this craft was custom-built. Although it actually provided a little bit more drag than a pre-made cockpit, because it consists of many parts attached to each other as opposed to one, the heat it is exposed to during re-entry can be distributed among the many parts - the low physics setting (available in game settings) also ensures this has a chance to happen before things explode. The vast majority of my final procedure was done above 30km where there is much less re-entry heat. In fact, at around the 6:00 mark, you can see that I dip in an out of the atmosphere - falling and rising again by about 4km to drain speed without falling too far down. Although at higher altitudes like this there is much less heat, there is much less drag to slow down which is why the aerobrake took so long as previously stated. Essentially, the atmosphere provides an impulse - a small force over a very long time does just as much work on the SSTO as a larger force over a much shorter time (which is how most re-entrys go) although the second option is much more deadly. Despite all this, the landing took several attempts because explosions which is why I ran the Kerbal around at the end - I couldn't believe that I didn't blow up! :) Hope that answers everything!
Hey, just how exactly do people (like you) design sstos? I've been trying to get several to work and I can't figure out how. I've been assuming that there's some sort of 'magic ratio' that sstos adhere to. Am I on the right track? Please help.
+greymangames Mostly comes down to good enough TWR (and enough fuel) after switching from air-breathing engines to rockets, to minimize the losses through drag in the upper atmosphere, while at the same time taking an efficient path through the atmosphere to minimize the need for additional burns outside the atmosphere to achieve orbit. It's as much skill of engineering as it is skill of piloting the craft.
greymangames I don't know of any, I just went and looked at SSTOs in the forum and flew a few, where the .craft files were provided. After that it was test and error.
![[Stock] Minmus Base: SSTO Shipment 1 - KSP](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vI3bvYF45oc/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Stock] Minmus Base: SSTO Shipment 1 - KSP](/img/tr.png)
![[Stock] Minmus Base: SSTO Shipment 3 - KSP](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3aF590BArhM/mqdefault.jpg)
You know you're a badass when you don't actually need to land the plane to put down the cargo. On a moon.
Your attention to amusement details kill me.
The dropdown, the solar panels opening to the music (that was plain beautiful), the approach back to Kerbin...
Very well done, sir!
+Túlio Miranda Hearing things like this makes it all worthwhile :) glad you noticed!
+Túlio Miranda The changing of modes of the rapier engines as well.
+Túlio Miranda {reads comment} Huh? solar panels? {rewatches video} ohh.. wow, that's cool
+Hazard-ish As a small suggestion, I would like to see more parts in normal time. You speed up almost everything and it doesn't give people an accurate picture of the actual physics.
+TheRealToaster2 He'll be able to get away with that when 1.1 is released.
In late December.
I have officially found someone better than scott manley at KSP
That's late.
Hazardish uses cheatmode... si easy To be better
Sultranos ,no he is legit dumbass
@@RexRegire not anymore he doesnt use cheats
Sorry for the wait, everyone. I've been very busy recently and haven't had the time to make videos. Finding the right music also took longer than expected for this one so if anybody has any music suggestions for future videos let me know :)
Try to do the Endurance from Interestellar and fly it to Eve. Nice video :D
+Hazard-ish in general audionautix.com is great for KSP music. Its license free too :)
Thanks for the nicely edited and fast paced KSP video. Really enjoyable!
+Hazard-ish Check out an artist called "without.directive". He has a lot (if not all) of his music for free download and I wouldn't think that he would be against you using his music if you asked him. Has a very diverse style of mostly instrumental and some with vocals. Not all of it will be what you're looking for, like I said he touches on many different genres. I think he's an unknown artist that deserves a little attention. At the very least give it a listen when you're bored one day :) Can't wait for part 3 Hazard-ish. Your vids are always so fun to watch.
+Hazard-ish I Have A Suggestion For Part 3. Make A Station And Have A Little Probe Come To The Scanner Probe Every So Often To Fetch Extra Resources Or To Pump It Up With Electricity To Scan More! Also, The Station Is Also Made With Another SSTO Around Minmus, So Put One Into Orbit Of Minmus To Make The Station Core Core (Yes, I Meant To Put That) So That It Could Dock With The Other SSTO To Get Back To Kerbin. 1 SSTO Will Be Left In Orbit Of Kerbin While The Other SSTO Will Land On Kerbin And The Other One Will Follow! Think You Can Do That? I Am Sure You Can Expand The Base And Make A Station At The Same Time! ;D
+Hazard-ish incompetech.com/
I love the way you nonchalantly drop off the cargo like "Right there ya go, I'm off"
I actually laughed out loud when I saw him drop the materials and jet off. Well done sir!
You need to make a tutorial series on SSTOs. I know most of us are very inexperienced on them, and you seem to be quite the expert. Looking forward to the growth on your channel, nice job mate.
The expert at using cheats to be sure.
@@evedoingthingsaaaaa hey!! Leave.him.alone.bud
Nice. Really liked the solar panels, they looked wonderful, like that 😁
i am still trying to figure out how the 2 solar rods were stuck to the center one. Like there is no docking ports or separators holding it together
There's some trick to it that I don't completely understand. The two lateral docking ports on the center column are what's connected to the two side beams. You can use docking ports as decouplers normally, which doesn't present a problem. The issue is that you can't attach the "port" side of a docking port to something's radial surface; it needs a normal node. After fooling around with the reroot tool for awhile, I can't figure a way to do it.
Trying to attach the outer side of a docking port to the I-beam directly just results in the radial attachment node taking precedence. So, even though the port LOOKS like it's attached to the I-beam using its port side, it's flipped around.
The best I can come up with is attaching the side beams' end docking port to the center beam's side docking ports in the VAB, and then using the rotate tool to make them appear parallel, even though they're still coupled.
Alternatively, you could attach cubic octagonal struts to the side beams in an inconspicuous way, using the move tool to clip it into the I-beam. Then you'd have a node the docking port could connect to.
If there's a way to actually attach the outside of the docking port directly to the radial surface of an I-beam, I'd be thrilled to hear about it.
I just love how you dropped it off like a total badass, never even touching the surface ;)
Yay! More awesome SSTO action!
Your designs are genius, your play masterful, and your planning almost precognitive. Teach me, master.
That payload drop was fantastic.
Bloody brilliant job.
That poor kerbal during reentry. Also, can you imagine sitting in one seat without being able to remove your EVA suit for a 1 month long space flight? Yikes!
Kerbals are a hardy species
They don't poop.
I stranded a kerbal on the orbit for 37 years
@@ox1y1gen poor kerbal
@@ox1y1gen lol and I thought my kerbal had it bad when he was stuck on the Mun for 2 years
That was beautiful. Plain artistry. I love the plane tails strapped to the sides of your SSTO.
Nice to see some more quality instead of quantity
We need a craft download... I'm crying of happiness.
5:23 with the music and the camera angle and the lighting is majestic. this game has me addicted. you are a god.
Really incredible work. I just found your channel today through your reddit post about stock hinges, and I'm hooked on going through all of these. I'm consistently amazed by your craftsmanship and skill in KSP - extremely well done, and you've definitely earned a new sub.
Hazard-ish, I just.... IDK anymore. 10/10.
I've discovered this channel recently. I am really lovin it. The other day I read in the comments that the videos you make have something special, something that makes them really cool. I think that your ideas and how you put them into practice are extremely elegant, and they convey the impression that it couldn't have been executed better. Anyhow, keep the good work up.
Wow, thank you! I love hearing things like this. I do try to make each of my videos interesting - the only problem with that is they can take a while to finish :P
Te wait was totally worth it. I can't figure out how can you make this. You are awesome :D
That dropoff was disgusting... I Love It!
nice work m8 ^^
Your videos are seriously impressive. And that shot at 5:20 is beautiful too.
Holy shit thanks for uploading, my hero
Impressive ! your video looks very professional. Everything just fit perfectly.
Please keep making more video :)
Wow. Just Wow. I can't wait till ep. 3
Holy crap that drop down was pure badass
Great video, cant wait for more!
+Michael Easton Thanks! Part 3 will have to wait for a short while since I'm working on another project (that will be uploaded shortly!) but will be much more impressive than this installment :D
Hazard-ish Cant wait!
Beautiful craft, beautiful video - amazing skill. Who needs cockpits anyways :D
Nice work as always! :)
best KSP builder and gamer
P.S best youtuber ever
You is the KSP God, you is amazing
We have the technology, we can make part three!!
This is a really interesting challenge... I might try doing a spaceplane-only save sometime soon.
hazarish,you deserve SO MANY MORE SUBS.your every epesode is very entertaining, and is well edited.i expected u to have 1 million, but 30k!?! its not bad but wow.EVERYONE! SHARE HIS/HER VIDEOS :D
*his
Oh and also for part one ship cause that looks awesome to fly
Didnt expect that dropping the cargo in mid air is also an option ;D
But in the latest version I would have expected the kerbal to be burned in the atmosphere ^^
Love your videos, keep up the great work :)
Dat SSTO looks incredible
Meanwhile... I try to figure out how to rescue a stranded ship from the mun... Good work, man
I like how you deorbit straight to the runway and land. I envy you :p
Love your vids!
very nice solar array :)
This is beautiful, you should make a tutorial on how to make good SSTO's, that would be really cool
Yes it's part two!
Hazard, you have very neat and clean editing skills. I trade off between you and Scott Manley for content on KSP and find your skill sets pretty equal. I would love to see you combine your speed builds with career mode. This artistic choice would be very fun to watch in career mode and it's high speed pace keeps me engaged even in the house keeping portions. Keep doing great work!
damn that exit was smooth
Beautiful
Bro i never comment on ur vids BUT THAT COCKPIT THOUGH
HAZARD-ISH I love your vids :)
Comment for future (2020), I remember when you only had 40,000 subs, now you have a billion
Special delivery!
your rockets are so cool!
Yay!! It Is Here! I Am Happy! ;D
I really want to make a Mun base, but... The science module is... 2.5 Kerbal Units large, and it won't fit in the Mk-3 cargo bays... How do I build a good SSTO that can do it?
Lance Stinson Wings. Ever heard of a custom design?
The Emerald Men it is impossible to do that. Teach me.
This is so cool
Are you excited for 1.0.5? I know I am!
+Mastikator 1.1? YES! 1.0.5? Sort of. I'll be sure to mess around with all of the new parts added which is great but, with ships as big as ones I'm working on currently (800+ parts), it's the Unity 5 performance increase that I am looking forward to.
+Hazard-ish I'm gonna love those Vector thrusting engines. On another note, I'm pretty upset about how they are replacing the MK 1 cockpit. In light of this, I had backed up the files for it and plan to release a mod for when the update comes out!
+Hazard-ish that performance increase is what im wating for too.
Major Missile wha Nam?
Still waiting for part 3 ^^
I'm glad people haven't forgotten about it! I've got most of that video finished but I need to do some other videos before I can wrap it up. I am working on it though and it's going to be a good one! :)
+Hazard-ish I hope it will be good one! Thanks for giving me hope haha i was kinda sure it's dead
you should make a new base using ksp 1.2 , what better way to show off all the new parts and mechanics, plus these vids are orgasmic, i think i became a little aroused when all those solar panels extended ;) and not to mention deploying moon cargo like a boss
Cant wait!
The Firzen me to
Omg I did not know minimum was in kerb ins orbit!
holy shit i would love that icecream
TNT_AND_THE_FLAME, its not a science base, just to let kerbals stay at minmus to eat near endless icecream. yep.
we need a new shipment from minimum, my mint ice cream is running low and I'm grumpy without m mint ice cream :)
Your profile pic looks ready.
Klaas Gersson and the new language too
Your a very skilled player here. I suck at even going to the moon on a one way mission. 😂
that's fucking awesome
2:45 omfg, its a atom
pgmbuilder120 OMG you're right
Every time I see those mountains coming over the horizon, I wonder how on earth you get it so accurate every time you re-enter?
So why don't you turn on your nuclear engine the moment you change rapier modes?
+oEQjet Good question, I don't know actually. In retrospect, I probably should have - it would have been a little bit more efficient! Thankfully I still had plenty of fuel at the end though :)
+Hazard-ish Speaking of efficiency, you can alter the periapsis of an hyperbolic orbit by burning radially, being more efficient and less time consuming, than burning retrograde at a high periapsis for capture. As a bonus, the capture at lower altitude and higher speed will be more efficient, thanks to the Oberth-effect. (compared to capture in high orbit and followed by lowering of the orbit to the target altitude)
a bunch of stuff that i really don't understand
+Adil Basically at high-altitudes and high-speeds, where you fly through the sphere of influence and don't get captured, you can more efficiently change your periapsis (lowest point of an orbit) by burning towards the planet/moon, 90° offset towards your velocity-vector, instead of directly against your velocity vector. If you now circularize at the lower periapsis you were more efficient (used less fuel) than first circularizing in a high-orbit and then lowering it to the target altitude and circularizing again.
thanks for explaining, i never understood the terms
God damnit, I hate how you always land them back at the KSC. It makes me too jelly!
Today I landed on the Mun.
What? My ship exploded and Jeb was the only survivor? Nah, I used kerbal physics so I could get there. ;3
You do this and then I can't even get an SSTO to work properly for myself... I need to work on my design skills...
DAT hovering tho
you need to do a tutorial in the cockpit design
Why don't you use conics mode 3? It helps me avoid retrograde orbits like you had...not really a huge deal, just ocd thing :)
Hazardish, can you please explain your witchcraft at 1:35 ? I can't hit Eve if I wanted to, let alone Minmus.
You could make a video teaching how to make these new planes? I really like your videos and think their incredible projects, but I have difficulty in making aircraft and would love it if you make a Video teaching how to assemble them.
ITS BEEN 2 YEARS ALMOST AND STILL NO PART 3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I love this! tho I guess there is Not going to be a part 3 right?
How are you do good?? Subbed!
Geezus! Thats amazing :D
Uhm... Craftfile? :)
I am very interested in how you attached the engines.
Imagine if one of those tipped over..... :(
I would cry ;-;
I haven`t played in a while, but why doesnt the nuclear engine consume any oxidizer?
How does it fly so well with no canards!?
Landing is for noobs. Darn, that was smooth.
Do the upturned wingtips have a function? I usually find I don't need much yaw control, and I would think the best place to put it would be at the center anyway.
+HebaruSan Extra yaw control is never a bad thing! Also, this crafts centre of lift is REALLY far back (as you can probably tell) so any slight maneuvers during scent can result in magnified wobbles.
Yea, a question. Why did you use 4 RAPIERs if you were only going to use 2 of them outside the atmosphere? You could've EASILY placed whiplashes instead of those 2 RAPIERs and save fuel.
You have to have "ignore max temp" cheat on because kerbals roast in less than a second with re-entry heat
+adamsrealm Nope, re-entry heating was on 100% and I never touched the dreaded debug menu. As you can see from my descent profile, I came in at a very shallow angle. I started my third aerobrake at sunrise and landed at the KSC in what is equivalent to the afternoon. In real-life time the final aerobrake and decent took roughly half an hour to complete. This is because I used the 'max delta physics' slider to my advantage by setting the game to calculate the physics at the lowest possible speed.
Additionally, the cockpit I used for this craft was custom-built. Although it actually provided a little bit more drag than a pre-made cockpit, because it consists of many parts attached to each other as opposed to one, the heat it is exposed to during re-entry can be distributed among the many parts - the low physics setting (available in game settings) also ensures this has a chance to happen before things explode.
The vast majority of my final procedure was done above 30km where there is much less re-entry heat. In fact, at around the 6:00 mark, you can see that I dip in an out of the atmosphere - falling and rising again by about 4km to drain speed without falling too far down. Although at higher altitudes like this there is much less heat, there is much less drag to slow down which is why the aerobrake took so long as previously stated. Essentially, the atmosphere provides an impulse - a small force over a very long time does just as much work on the SSTO as a larger force over a much shorter time (which is how most re-entrys go) although the second option is much more deadly.
Despite all this, the landing took several attempts because explosions which is why I ran the Kerbal around at the end - I couldn't believe that I didn't blow up! :)
Hope that answers everything!
Holy shit.
Lovely little SSO :) Did you share the ship file anywhere?
Please can you put craft download links in. I need to try this out
How did you use the exposed chair as a main pilot seat? I thought you can't do that?
Could you add a link to download the craft? A VERY GREEEAT SSTO!
For the first episode to please
Could you possibly put out the save file for craft I would love to use it
are the nosecones on the rapiers useful in anything or it is just for looks purpose?
a more advanced version of planet base
mods...
Hello there. New to KSP. Does stock mean a prebuilt ship, or does it mean you designed the ship yourself using only stock parts?
Designed and built by myself but only using stock parts :)
like. a. boss.
Still waiting for part 3 rip
Hey, just how exactly do people (like you) design sstos? I've been trying to get several to work and I can't figure out how.
I've been assuming that there's some sort of 'magic ratio' that sstos adhere to. Am I on the right track?
Please help.
There isn't. Trial and error (mostly error) is what works for me :/
+greymangames Mostly comes down to good enough TWR (and enough fuel) after switching from air-breathing engines to rockets, to minimize the losses through drag in the upper atmosphere, while at the same time taking an efficient path through the atmosphere to minimize the need for additional burns outside the atmosphere to achieve orbit.
It's as much skill of engineering as it is skill of piloting the craft.
Jain Zar
Is there an updated guide anywhere for it that i can reference?
greymangames I don't know of any, I just went and looked at SSTOs in the forum and flew a few, where the .craft files were provided. After that it was test and error.
May I please have the .craft file you make the best creations.
Wait, re-entry with a Kerbal on top of the SSTO? How didn't he burn to ashes?
Are you some sort of magician? It seems as though you were lined up for the runway on the opposite side of Kerbin! What is this sorcery?