I have the Quest and Pico 4 and I do prefer the Pico 4 for my PCVR gaming especially the FOV and color. QUest has a vibrant color but I feel like it is too saturated in some games especially the ones I play. Pico 4 also works perfectly with VD
Haven't encountered a headset that would win it from my Pico4 and Quest3. They are both great headsets. Quest a lot for stand alone and PCVR, Pico4 mainly PCVR, all connected wireless with Virtual Desktop.
I on the other hand adore tethered VR headsets... the cable bothered me the first week, but now I don't even think about it anymore. (I probably developed unconscious strategies to navigate around it) The increase in image quality is really why I am having a hard time going wireless.
@@PixelShade Amazing. For the majority of players it's the opposite case. I've read so many complaints about malfunctioning cable connections in diverse Facebook groups, hardly any about wireless setups. But mostly USB connections. Maybe display ports are another thing. In my situation I have my router less than two meters away from my headset. It has mostly a very high bitrate. Good that we have options, right?
In my opinion connecting the quest to a USB port is slower than a direct to display port connection. I get more frames per seconds with direct to display port.
I’m not sure about that but there is certainly a LOT more latency with the Quest using a regular usb that doesn’t direct output video. Plus, with a direct display port or video output USB-C, you can take advantage of Nvidia Reflex with an Nvidia GPU for even better response times. It made a noticeable difference in iRacing to me on my G2.
In europe the big sreen beyond is 1369 euro and another 149 euros for the audio strap....the quest 3 512 gb is 699 with asgards wrath 2 and 6 months of subscription to meta + another 80 euros for bobo vr m3 pro; the cristal light will be around 1000 euros with taxes. Meta is selling a lot of quest 3, the more they sell the better will be their customer service, if you buy something few people buy then the customer service may be lacking, in any case i want a good allrounder so my choice is done
Your forgetting one thing Meta is absolutely horrendous with there customer support, they already the number one in the Vr Headset market yet they have one of the worse support out there
Thanks for all your videos. They are very informative on VR headsets. I have one of the alternatives for right now which is the Quest 3. I do SIM racing and have it connected via USB link cable. All my racing games run very good and the visual clarity and FOV are good and adequate for my racing. The Sweet Spot is very good and entire lens looks very good to see details while racing. I am still learning the Quest 3 so I don't know everything yet. My previous VR headset was and is the Rift S (backup headset) which has a lower Resolution but it connects to the Display Port of the RTX-3080-TI GFX card. Both headsets I can run in Oculus VR mode which the newer racing games provide in STEAM. Take care.
@@virtuallyreal I dont think getting pico neo 3 link or any other VR headset currently for PCVR is feasible when crystal lights launch is right around the corner, except if one wants wireless PCVR or something cheaper. Very excited to see how it performs, i hope that %30 reduction in weight will make it comfortable in head for long term sessions.
@@wolveslands6701 big difference in weight and cost between the two though. Both have Display port connections which is all that really matters if looking for high quality PCVR visuals, the n3L will outshine quest 3 and Pico 4 godlike settings for example purely because of the display port.
@@virtuallyreal Crystal light having display port is exactly why im looking forward to it, i dont care about wireless PCVR, im okay with compromising the freedom of wireless for a clearer, faster compression-less image with ultra low latency only possible with wired connection, for at least now.
Pre-Order Pimax Crystal Light: pimax.com/product/pimax-crystal-light-preorder-fee/?ref=mrtv (Affiliate)
Bigscreen Beyond: bit.ly/3YtEm9x (Affiliate)
Quest 3: amzn.to/3W27E0y (Affiliate)
Pico 4: amzn.to/3xNboJj (Affiliate)
Which headset are you gonna get?
I imported a pico 4, and i like it more than Quest 3. The low binocular overlap of the Q3 feels like a major oversight.
Agreed.
That, and also the QC problems related to the displays having mura and dead pixels.
I have the Quest and Pico 4 and I do prefer the Pico 4 for my PCVR gaming especially the FOV and color. QUest has a vibrant color but I feel like it is too saturated in some games especially the ones I play. Pico 4 also works perfectly with VD
Same, also the weight distribution makes the Pico significantly more comfortable.
It was great timing from Varjo to get out of the market for consumer VR headsets. They simply cannot compete with Pimax.
Can't compete in what regard? Its also always a bad thing if a company decides to ditch the consumer market for VR so this was a huge loss.
Haven't encountered a headset that would win it from my Pico4 and Quest3. They are both great headsets. Quest a lot for stand alone and PCVR, Pico4 mainly PCVR, all connected wireless with Virtual Desktop.
I on the other hand adore tethered VR headsets... the cable bothered me the first week, but now I don't even think about it anymore. (I probably developed unconscious strategies to navigate around it) The increase in image quality is really why I am having a hard time going wireless.
@@PixelShade Amazing. For the majority of players it's the opposite case. I've read so many complaints about malfunctioning cable connections in diverse Facebook groups, hardly any about wireless setups. But mostly USB connections. Maybe display ports are another thing. In my situation I have my router less than two meters away from my headset. It has mostly a very high bitrate. Good that we have options, right?
In my opinion connecting the quest to a USB port is slower than a direct to display port connection. I get more frames per seconds with direct to display port.
I’m not sure about that but there is certainly a LOT more latency with the Quest using a regular usb that doesn’t direct output video. Plus, with a direct display port or video output USB-C, you can take advantage of Nvidia Reflex with an Nvidia GPU for even better response times. It made a noticeable difference in iRacing to me on my G2.
would the crystal light be considered like a valve index 2? in a way?
HTC could easily have a winning headset. if they made an affordable PCVR pancake $700 vr headset
In europe the big sreen beyond is 1369 euro and another 149 euros for the audio strap....the quest 3 512 gb is 699 with asgards wrath 2 and 6 months of subscription to meta + another 80 euros for bobo vr m3 pro; the cristal light will be around 1000 euros with taxes. Meta is selling a lot of quest 3, the more they sell the better will be their customer service, if you buy something few people buy then the customer service may be lacking, in any case i want a good allrounder so my choice is done
Your forgetting one thing Meta is absolutely horrendous with there customer support, they already the number one in the Vr Headset market yet they have one of the worse support out there
I wonder if it would be possible to have a 60 ghz wigig for the quest 3 exactly like the pimax crystal, that would be amazing.
Hi, I have a mini DP port in my gaming laptop , will the pimax crystal light works with this mini DP port
Yes but you need an adapter
Thanks for all your videos. They are very informative on VR headsets.
I have one of the alternatives for right now which is the Quest 3. I do SIM racing and have it connected via USB link cable. All my racing games run very good and the visual clarity and FOV are good and adequate for my racing. The Sweet Spot is very good and entire lens looks very good to see details while racing. I am still learning the Quest 3 so I don't know everything yet.
My previous VR headset was and is the Rift S (backup headset) which has a lower Resolution but it connects to the Display Port of the RTX-3080-TI GFX card.
Both headsets I can run in Oculus VR mode which the newer racing games provide in STEAM.
Take care.
Any news from Bigscreen regarding upgraded to full screen 90hz or new version?
Nope.
I play at 75hz and it's smoother than Index at 90hz. I also feel much less motion sickness with the Beyond versus the Index.
@@808jonnysmith thats oleds for you Baby
@@808jonnysmith Makes sense since pixel respons time is so much higher for Micro Oled compared to LCD.
The light is the best glasses for this price. 35 PPD!! The rest cnanot compete. its either 2k euros like big scren beyond or low quality
bigscreen is 1k not 2k
@@Eskoxo 2k in europe
@@TommyScott-g1pthe price of bigscreen beyond in Europe is €1369
@@Eskoxo You also need to add the cost of VR base stations for Bigscreen VR.
@@Eskoxo Bigscreen pricing is a rip off if you live outside the USA.
Looking forward to XR4 content. I’m surprised Varjo isn’t sending it out yet.
Probably it's not ready for prime time.
@@mixedrealityTV yeah. They may have rushed it out to beat Apple.
Thank you!!
And about Pico neo 3 link ?
It's also a good headset. But it is starting to look a bit dated!
Supersampling with custom drivers, it's far from looking dated visually 😁
@@virtuallyreal I dont think getting pico neo 3 link or any other VR headset currently for PCVR is feasible when crystal lights launch is right around the corner, except if one wants wireless PCVR or something cheaper.
Very excited to see how it performs, i hope that %30 reduction in weight will make it comfortable in head for long term sessions.
@@wolveslands6701 big difference in weight and cost between the two though.
Both have Display port connections which is all that really matters if looking for high quality PCVR visuals, the n3L will outshine quest 3 and Pico 4 godlike settings for example purely because of the display port.
@@virtuallyreal Crystal light having display port is exactly why im looking forward to it, i dont care about wireless PCVR, im okay with compromising the freedom of wireless for a clearer, faster compression-less image with ultra low latency only possible with wired connection, for at least now.
make a film about ey tracking pls
Bizarre that you include the Somnium but don't include Pimax Super 🤷♂️
The Somnium is closer than the Super. So nothing Bizarre about it.
@mixedrealityTV it needs base stations and is more expensive than the Super even without base stations. How does that make it closer? Indeed bizarre
@@vincentsantucci2478Closer to release...
👍🏼
PSVR 2