The Mimeoplasm and Yarok decks were awesome! Also, I loved that Scapeshift + Roil Elemental + Stolen Yarok play from the Tatyova deck! The Trostani's one is also awesome, you just had bad draws today, great video as always!
Sultai is the most powerful color combination in EDH, by far. Anything with green has a huge advantage over every non-green deck, and black is the second best color, and blue the third, so.... yeah, they tend to be awesome.
Also at 7:13 didn't dede reveal a spring bloom druid instead of a beast within? I'm also pretty sure they played that burgeoning as if it was an exploration.
If your opponent is able to repeatedly turn a Fetchland into a Black Lotus, you know that you're in for a solid uphill battle!!! Loved to see Tatyova doing Tatyova stuff! She's just insane! Great game, although I really would have loved to see Trostani take off! Really enjoy that deck of yours, Andrew!
At 6:50, there is a slight activation error - Michael has to discard the card as a cost, not an effect. The way he handled bouncing Tatyova allows the perception that he changed his discard choice after the activation resolved. This is not the case - all words to the left of the ":" must occur to pit the ability on the stack.
Cobra is good if you can put multiple lands onto the battlefield at once, Swordtooth gives access to a second Tatyova trigger each turn. It's hard to see, but I think Adam's hand is quite empty at that time, hence he's picking Swordtooth to refill it (Tatyova isn't on the battlefield then, but he tries to cast her the following turn).
@@sebastianahrens2385 You nailed it. Cobra wouldn't have provided much value considering how much mana I had, I was optimizing for a chunky blocker and a way to dump even more lands in to play.
@@adameister5883 No offense to the other Tatyova's on this channel but their lists were terrible. Thanks for showing them how its done. Add a couple extra turn spells!
You should have let Dede use your Séance to deal with some threats of Michael and then destroy it, it would be a lot smarter for your sad and slow game :P.
I recently bought your Trostani list because of how fun and explosvie it has looked on earlier videos, sadly you got stuck on mana. From playtesting i found abit more 2-3 mana ramp spells made a huge diffrence together with the mana doublers + seedborn muse, while taking out some of the giant 6-8drops
If you ever play with Dédé again, unless he asked to pronounced Diddy (like Diddy Kong), it's usually pronounced more like Day-Day. Here's the song "Dédé" from Les Colocs ruclips.net/video/lN4jink8cu8/видео.html
I don't quite get why Andrew gave up in the end. Unless Michael had some additional reach, he only has 23 damage on the board, so you live another turn. When Andrew casts the Regal Behemoth, he can stack the Monarch and Bramble triggers so he can tap for 3x on his lands when paying for the Bramble to copy the Regal Behemoth, still floating 1 green. Lands now tap for 4x per land with 4 lands untapped (1 forest, 1 W/G, 1 colorless, 1 white source). Tap white mana for floating 1 Green, 4 White - populate with Vitu Guildmage on the Behemoth, leaving 1 white floating. Lands now tap for 5x. Tap forest, colorless and white, 5 green, 5 colorless, 6 white floating - Cast Trostani, leaving 3 green, 5 colorless, 4 white floating. Populate the Behemoth two more times to net 10 live. You're left with a board of 5 Regal Behemoths, Trostani, Bramble, Guildmage - total 33 power and 40 life. Michael is at 10... Annihilator 2 is laughable with a Sakura-tribe Elder and a land to throw away. How is that game lost to attempt? You have sufficient attempts on the board. I know I made a semi-complicated min-maxing but even just copying the Behemoth with the Bramble, play Trostani and populate with the remaining mana should be enough to try at least.
He also had Panharmonicon, so he'd get double Bramble Sovereign triggers and double Trostani life gain. Of course, he'd still die to 2 hits from the flying hexproof Mimeoplasm, but he could probably have won on his next turn first.
@@NMS127 I am a fool, I forgot the Panharmonicon, so it would be even more ridiculous. Michael had only 10 life and couldn't kill Andrew on the board, so I would have played the game out and attempt to win on the next turn if I were Andrew.
Lol, I'm building a Yarok deck so I'm watching all the videos I can on him. And this is the second one where he gets stolen by a Tatiyova to make them really go off with landfall.
Just some suggestions for potential deck matches ayli Eternal pilgrim lifegain reanimator , kenrith returned King pillowfort Re-Animator, Urza construct build,
Hey there. May I suggest for you to add the name of the player when presenting their starting hands? At least for me, it would help me pay more attention to the first rounds of the game. Very often, when you mention someones name in the early rounds I have to maybe pause the video to understand would played each card. I believe that adding the name of the player on the beginning helps the viewers creating a "link" between each player and their commander.
Oof I know the feel of having only 1 white most of the game with trostani also wonder if you could update us on your trostani deck and the changes you have made I been working on mine alot and (though I have alot of diffrent cards in there) it runs in the same aspects that yours does but its lacking a few cards to make it ideal P.S. have you tried darien king of kjeldor in your deck with him and trostani people either have to kill one of them or 1 shot you but you do you figured I would try to suggest some spice :) Love your videos keep up on the good work good sir!!
Roil Elemental takes control away from the owner until it leaves the battlefield, which essentially happens when Adam dies. Without an effect that takes that control away from the original caster/"owner", the overtaken creatures return to the last place they were controlled indefinitely (most likely by the caster of the creature or the reanimator of it). For instance if Michael reanimated one of Andrew's creatures from the graveyard, and Adam took control with Roil Elemental, but then dies, the creature returns to Michael, as it's the last place it was controlled without a control-altering effect.
@@m.r.r.2636 Incorrect. rule 800.4a states that: When a player leaves the game, all objects (see rule 109) owned by that player leave the game, any effects which give that player control of any objects or players end, and all spells and abilities controlled by that player on the stack cease to exist. Then, if there are any objects still controlled by that player, those objects are exiled. This is not a state-based action. It happens as soon as the player leaves the game. If the player who left the game had priority at the time he or she left, priority passes to the next player in turn order who’s still in the game.| So @SirChrisJames was correct in saying that all the permanents of other players that were under the losing players control should've been exiled. Since the return trigger also gets removed from the stack
There are no "return control" triggers. Even if the controlling effects had been permanent, they would've ceased the moment Adam lost, returning the creatures to their previous controllers. In order for an object to be exiled, it has to be cast or put into the battlefield by that player. If Adam had used Bribery to grab a creature from an opponent's library, for example, then that creature would've been exiled.
@@m.r.r.2636 hmm looks like you are right and i was wrong. Since roil elemental doesn't specifically say that when it leaves the battlefield it returns all creatures. I thought it was worded like oblivion ring and it would put a trigger on the stack. So i have to apologize for implying your incompetence. Sorry
That was a tough break for Adam. I thought that he had the game wrapped up. I prefer Ob Nixilis the Fallen over Roil Elemental, because he wins games instead of stealing creatures
@@DommyXMommy you're right. Sorry for the confusion, but you see I play a Yarok deck and that's a play line that I use. And Adam's board state looked very similar to games that I've had played
In this case, it's specifically cards owned by the player. If Adam had somehow cast his opponent's creatures, they would have been exiled when he left the game. However, Roil Elemental only gains control of target creature(s) until it leaves the battlefield. So when Adam was brutally murdered Roil left the field, returning all the things it stole back to their original owners instead of exiling them. Muddstah posted this article in another comment and it does a great job of explaining why this happens: blogs.magicjudges.org/rulestips/2012/08/multiplayer-monday-what-happens-when-a-player-leaves-the-game/
You're partly correct. You can find a better explanation than I could ever hope to give here as to why it worked the way we showed: blogs.magicjudges.org/rulestips/2012/08/multiplayer-monday-what-happens-when-a-player-leaves-the-game/
Dude in my lord windgrace deck it does work especially if i float mana sacificing my lands to a squandered resources or zuran orb then getting them back with Splendid reclamation it gets dumb especially if you have both squandered resources and a Amulet of vigor
Adam dissapointed me BIG TIME! Tatyova is my main deck and I couldn't stay all the missplay and lack of interaction from him. Especially, counterspell package, which could have been better and cheaper. Adam had the game all the time, but still managed to give it away But I like your channel anyway, keep it up))
I like watching your videos, but as someone who doesn't know a lot a cards, I have to keep pausing the video to understand what is going on. So a suggestion would be to increase the zoom time for recent played cards so people can actually read the whole card. Sometimes cards can have a lot o text, so this give us some time to read. Thanks, keep up the good work!
Hi Renan, Thanks for the suggestion! I've actually increased the length the card stays on screen a few times at this point. My main concern now is that if I leave it up any longer, it obstructs the view of the table. I'll see if I can tweak it more though.
Playing a card that let's all your opponents sac an artifact or enchantment, is not really a 3 for 1. Each player loses 1 card, including the caster of the spell, it's basicly 1for 1 but then for the entire table at the same time.
no hate but commanders like tatyova and yarok are some of the most boring and linear commanders out there. Such a shame to see the more interesting decks at the table have such a tough start
When the rest of the table gangs up on you and makes it an archenemy game because you built a good deck doesn't mean he isn't a powerful player. Adam did mess up by not blocking the first time but there's only so much one can do against 3 opponents. This is why combo decks suffer against creature beats. Adam had the win but it was ripped from him by the other 3 players who just wanted the game to go on longer. That doesn't really sound like fun.
@@kj635 Of course. That's what needs to be done. It's just infuriating watching someone construct a good deck, pilot it pretty well, and then draw the ire of the table because their deck is doing what it needs to do to win. After a certain point, they decided that simply removing his cards wasn't enough and they needed to remove the player through the only known method this channel implores, creature beats.
@@charlesmaillho367 I don't get it. So because there's a combo player that seems to be popping off, it's unfun that the other players pull together to stop him from winning? That sounds reasonable enough to me to warrant gathering up against someone.
@@m.r.r.2636 Then you must have never been in Adam's shoes before. When it seems like the game is going in your favor and then everyone decides they don't want to play with you anymore what is fun about that?
Muddstah, you should know by now that all permanents owned by a losing player should be exiled :( rule 800.4a states that: When a player leaves the game, all objects (see rule 109) owned by that player leave the game, any effects which give that player control of any objects or players end, and all spells and abilities controlled by that player on the stack cease to exist. Then, if there are any objects still controlled by that player, those objects are exiled. This is not a state-based action. It happens as soon as the player leaves the game. If the player who left the game had priority at the time he or she left, priority passes to the next player in turn order who’s still in the game. So all the permanents of other players that were under the losing players control should've been exiled since the return trigger is removed from the stack.
I'm going to assume that this is referring to the point where someone is taken out after stealing a bunch of things? This seems to come up a lot. There's a major different between what is "owned" and what is "controlled". The Roil Elemental stealing things would qualify under this clause: *any effects which give that player control of any objects or players end* - which means that with Adam being knocked out, so too are the effects. This goes in to detail better than I can: blogs.magicjudges.org/rulestips/2012/08/multiplayer-monday-what-happens-when-a-player-leaves-the-game/
@@MTGMuddstah hmm looks like you are right and i was wrong. Since roil elemental doesn't specifically say that when it leaves the battlefield it returns all creatures. I thought it was worded like oblivion ring and it would put a trigger on the stack. So i have to apologize for implying your incompetence, when you were in fact doing the correct thing.
"Temur Sabertooth, a card which is never used in a fair way". Yeap. That's why I love it
The Mimeoplasm and Yarok decks were awesome! Also, I loved that Scapeshift + Roil Elemental + Stolen Yarok play from the Tatyova deck! The Trostani's one is also awesome, you just had bad draws today, great video as always!
Sultai is the most powerful color combination in EDH, by far. Anything with green has a huge advantage over every non-green deck, and black is the second best color, and blue the third, so.... yeah, they tend to be awesome.
Wasnt Adam's "exploration" actually a burgeoning on the table?
1 like = $1 towards getting Andrew some glasses that actually work.
Reading is hard!
@@MTGMuddstah But didnt he still play with it like it was an exploration? Lol!
Also at 7:13 didn't dede reveal a spring bloom druid instead of a beast within? I'm also pretty sure they played that burgeoning as if it was an exploration.
@Creed Ian I don't
Yeees! Turn counter added! I really, REALLY love that overlay now. Thank you for providing so much content and constantly working to improve it.
the bounce spellshaper messed up a lot of the game, cool card
At long last, I get to see my first commander ever, The Mimeoplasm, do fun stuff in a game in this channel. :D
If your opponent is able to repeatedly turn a Fetchland into a Black Lotus, you know that you're in for a solid uphill battle!!! Loved to see Tatyova doing Tatyova stuff! She's just insane!
Great game, although I really would have loved to see Trostani take off! Really enjoy that deck of yours, Andrew!
Caveman design
At 6:50, there is a slight activation error - Michael has to discard the card as a cost, not an effect. The way he handled bouncing Tatyova allows the perception that he changed his discard choice after the activation resolved. This is not the case - all words to the left of the ":" must occur to pit the ability on the stack.
I'm going to chalk that up to nervousness being on camera.
@@MTGMuddstah that's fair. Thought I'd point it out for all us rules nerds :p
I love all of the Commanders, so this is going to be an exciting game for me!
"Yarok: Dede has been lost to the void!
"
"Mimeoplasm: I don't know where Michael is!"
hhahahahaha
Adam used his Regrowth to get Wayward Swordtooth? I definitely would have grabbed Lotus Cobra or Ramunap Excavator?
Cobra is good if you can put multiple lands onto the battlefield at once, Swordtooth gives access to a second Tatyova trigger each turn. It's hard to see, but I think Adam's hand is quite empty at that time, hence he's picking Swordtooth to refill it (Tatyova isn't on the battlefield then, but he tries to cast her the following turn).
@@sebastianahrens2385 You nailed it. Cobra wouldn't have provided much value considering how much mana I had, I was optimizing for a chunky blocker and a way to dump even more lands in to play.
@@adameister5883 Gotcha. I also questioned your wisdom casting GSZ for a Birds of Paradise.... until i realized you had Chord of Calling too.
@@adameister5883 No offense to the other Tatyova's on this channel but their lists were terrible. Thanks for showing them how its done. Add a couple extra turn spells!
I usually watch your videos at 1,25 speed, but this is Trostani time. Savor every moment!
You should have let Dede use your Séance to deal with some threats of Michael and then destroy it, it would be a lot smarter for your sad and slow game :P.
Andrew you should pte your creature to get your second white source in early game lol
Great game as always! Hopefully I can also sit down at a table and play some games with you guys in a future event!
Really enjoyed this video! One of the best lately! That Tatyova deck did some crazy stuff it makes me want to build a Simic deck lol
As a fellow Trostani player, I get happy when I see a video of you playing your deck, then get sad as you either get focused or fall behind.
Actually, the creatures taken by Adam would be exiled as he leaves the game (800.4a)
Edit: Oh wait, Roil Elemental, that makes sense.
Thank you. I was confused as well.
But why are they not exiled?
Roil Elemental gave control. With the elemental gone, control goes back before they get exiled.
LMAO the "flying eldrazi spaghetti monster" lmao
I recently bought your Trostani list because of how fun and explosvie it has looked on earlier videos, sadly you got stuck on mana.
From playtesting i found abit more 2-3 mana ramp spells made a huge diffrence together with the mana doublers + seedborn muse, while taking out some of the giant 6-8drops
Yea, I definitely need to tweek it a bit more.
Whoa, Cryptic Command in Sultai is bold
If you ever play with Dédé again, unless he asked to pronounced Diddy (like Diddy Kong), it's usually pronounced more like Day-Day.
Here's the song "Dédé" from Les Colocs
ruclips.net/video/lN4jink8cu8/видео.html
I don't quite get why Andrew gave up in the end. Unless Michael had some additional reach, he only has 23 damage on the board, so you live another turn.
When Andrew casts the Regal Behemoth, he can stack the Monarch and Bramble triggers so he can tap for 3x on his lands when paying for the Bramble to copy the Regal Behemoth, still floating 1 green.
Lands now tap for 4x per land with 4 lands untapped (1 forest, 1 W/G, 1 colorless, 1 white source).
Tap white mana for floating 1 Green, 4 White - populate with Vitu Guildmage on the Behemoth, leaving 1 white floating. Lands now tap for 5x.
Tap forest, colorless and white, 5 green, 5 colorless, 6 white floating - Cast Trostani, leaving 3 green, 5 colorless, 4 white floating. Populate the Behemoth two more times to net 10 live.
You're left with a board of 5 Regal Behemoths, Trostani, Bramble, Guildmage - total 33 power and 40 life. Michael is at 10... Annihilator 2 is laughable with a Sakura-tribe Elder and a land to throw away.
How is that game lost to attempt? You have sufficient attempts on the board. I know I made a semi-complicated min-maxing but even just copying the Behemoth with the Bramble, play Trostani and populate with the remaining mana should be enough to try at least.
He also had Panharmonicon, so he'd get double Bramble Sovereign triggers and double Trostani life gain. Of course, he'd still die to 2 hits from the flying hexproof Mimeoplasm, but he could probably have won on his next turn first.
@@NMS127 I am a fool, I forgot the Panharmonicon, so it would be even more ridiculous. Michael had only 10 life and couldn't kill Andrew on the board, so I would have played the game out and attempt to win on the next turn if I were Andrew.
Lol, I'm building a Yarok deck so I'm watching all the videos I can on him. And this is the second one where he gets stolen by a Tatiyova to make them really go off with landfall.
Heck yeah 2 of my favorite commanders! (Yarok and Tatyova)
Trey Curet Honestly it’s a personal preference but I agree with you, those 2 commanders are generic snoozefests.
Where can I see that tatyova decklist? The link in the description is not working
i want the tatyova´s deck!!!PLS, can someone share the list with me??? :,c
that link dont work
Is Adam also AP from legendary creature podcast??? They have a very similar tattoo
Man, I watched this video for Tatyova, but she got targeted so hard, eating counter after counter, and even a kill spell over Oracle! Bummer.
wow michaels deck was awesome
Just some suggestions for potential deck matches ayli Eternal pilgrim lifegain reanimator , kenrith returned King pillowfort Re-Animator, Urza construct build,
Hey there. May I suggest for you to add the name of the player when presenting their starting hands? At least for me, it would help me pay more attention to the first rounds of the game. Very often, when you mention someones name in the early rounds I have to maybe pause the video to understand would played each card. I believe that adding the name of the player on the beginning helps the viewers creating a "link" between each player and their commander.
He says it. He goes "Here's Adam with his ________ deck starting with..."
Andrew loves Trisonani. I'm a big fan of Teysa myself.
Tristani
Was there a particular reason you held up so much mana for so many turns, whilst having enough mana to activate Vitu-Ghazi Guildmage?
Idk Roil elemental never really works when I try to play it.
To be fair, Adam wanted Avenger of Zendikar. I've only seen the elemental do stuff every now and then, so I don't play it much anymore either.
Adam could cast tatyova turn 3, followed by scapeshift with cobra on the table the next turn. That was the dream hand...
Oof I know the feel of having only 1 white most of the game with trostani also wonder if you could update us on your trostani deck and the changes you have made I been working on mine alot and (though I have alot of diffrent cards in there) it runs in the same aspects that yours does but its lacking a few cards to make it ideal
P.S. have you tried darien king of kjeldor in your deck with him and trostani people either have to kill one of them or 1 shot you but you do you figured I would try to suggest some spice :)
Love your videos keep up on the good work good sir!!
"we don't actually know how to read" lolz
I thought Adam dying would cause all the creatures he had stolen to be instead exiled. Is there an interaction I’m missing?
Roil Elemental takes control away from the owner until it leaves the battlefield, which essentially happens when Adam dies. Without an effect that takes that control away from the original caster/"owner", the overtaken creatures return to the last place they were controlled indefinitely (most likely by the caster of the creature or the reanimator of it).
For instance if Michael reanimated one of Andrew's creatures from the graveyard, and Adam took control with Roil Elemental, but then dies, the creature returns to Michael, as it's the last place it was controlled without a control-altering effect.
@@m.r.r.2636 Incorrect. rule 800.4a states that: When a player leaves the game, all objects (see rule 109) owned by that player leave the game, any effects which give that player control of any objects or players end, and all spells and abilities controlled by that player on the stack cease to exist. Then, if there are any objects still controlled by that player, those objects are exiled. This is not a state-based action. It happens as soon as the player leaves the game. If the player who left the game had priority at the time he or she left, priority passes to the next player in turn order who’s still in the game.|
So @SirChrisJames was correct in saying that all the permanents of other players that were under the losing players control should've been exiled. Since the return trigger also gets removed from the stack
This should help clarify any confusion: blogs.magicjudges.org/rulestips/2012/08/multiplayer-monday-what-happens-when-a-player-leaves-the-game/
There are no "return control" triggers. Even if the controlling effects had been permanent, they would've ceased the moment Adam lost, returning the creatures to their previous controllers.
In order for an object to be exiled, it has to be cast or put into the battlefield by that player. If Adam had used Bribery to grab a creature from an opponent's library, for example, then that creature would've been exiled.
@@m.r.r.2636 hmm looks like you are right and i was wrong. Since roil elemental doesn't specifically say that when it leaves the battlefield it returns all creatures.
I thought it was worded like oblivion ring and it would put a trigger on the stack.
So i have to apologize for implying your incompetence. Sorry
Really need this yarok list
Muddstah calling out all mtg players. We know we can't read >:I
That was a tough break for Adam. I thought that he had the game wrapped up. I prefer Ob Nixilis the Fallen over Roil Elemental, because he wins games instead of stealing creatures
crovax 13 he couldn’t run ob nix tho because tatyova isn’t black
@@DommyXMommy you're right. Sorry for the confusion, but you see I play a Yarok deck and that's a play line that I use. And Adam's board state looked very similar to games that I've had played
Ob is great but sadly not in Simic colors
Yeah I had no idea Gonti had nabbed that Cryptic Command. Oh well, it was a fun game!
when a player dies all cards controlled by that player are exiled
In this case, it's specifically cards owned by the player. If Adam had somehow cast his opponent's creatures, they would have been exiled when he left the game. However, Roil Elemental only gains control of target creature(s) until it leaves the battlefield. So when Adam was brutally murdered Roil left the field, returning all the things it stole back to their original owners instead of exiling them. Muddstah posted this article in another comment and it does a great job of explaining why this happens: blogs.magicjudges.org/rulestips/2012/08/multiplayer-monday-what-happens-when-a-player-leaves-the-game/
You're partly correct. You can find a better explanation than I could ever hope to give here as to why it worked the way we showed: blogs.magicjudges.org/rulestips/2012/08/multiplayer-monday-what-happens-when-a-player-leaves-the-game/
Great gAme love your channel
Oh, god, its Thursday!!!
This game convinced me to buy a lotus cobra
It's an incredible value engine. Dropping it early game can really rocket you forward.
Dude in my lord windgrace deck it does work especially if i float mana sacificing my lands to a squandered resources or zuran orb then getting them back with Splendid reclamation it gets dumb especially if you have both squandered resources and a Amulet of vigor
Adam dissapointed me BIG TIME!
Tatyova is my main deck and I couldn't stay all the missplay and lack of interaction from him. Especially, counterspell package, which could have been better and cheaper. Adam had the game all the time, but still managed to give it away
But I like your channel anyway, keep it up))
Sorry to hear that. I'm happy with how I played the game. I play with what I have access to, but of course counters could be better.
Was that a Redless game on purpose ir just happened? :P
that comeback tho !!
Ugh I really wanted that Tatyova list 😭
It's up now!
I was here for Adam, but I stayed for Tatyova
Why was the beast within a spring bloom Druid
Because I had both cards in my hand and just play the wrong one, they have the same mana cost. Is still a beast within in my graveyard after.
I like watching your videos, but as someone who doesn't know a lot a cards, I have to keep pausing the video to understand what is going on. So a suggestion would be to increase the zoom time for recent played cards so people can actually read the whole card. Sometimes cards can have a lot o text, so this give us some time to read. Thanks, keep up the good work!
Hi Renan,
Thanks for the suggestion! I've actually increased the length the card stays on screen a few times at this point. My main concern now is that if I leave it up any longer, it obstructs the view of the table. I'll see if I can tweak it more though.
13 turns, no Trostani. ouch!
Good vid bruh
Heck yea!
Shouldn't the card on top of adam's library been a burgeoning
When yarrok got stolen you know it's serious and demands concentrated effort
Nice
Second time in a row that Trostani falls
Playing a card that let's all your opponents sac an artifact or enchantment, is not really a 3 for 1. Each player loses 1 card, including the caster of the spell, it's basicly 1for 1 but then for the entire table at the same time.
I suppose that's true. I was speaking more along the lines in that three cards were sacrificed for his one.
@@MTGMuddstah no problem lol. Nice video 😉
@@traycarrot not gonna spent time explaining.
"Temur Sabertooth, which is a card that is never used in a fair way"
My janky Nethroi cattribal deck disagrees with you.
So Adam should have won then?
no hate but commanders like tatyova and yarok are some of the most boring and linear commanders out there. Such a shame to see the more interesting decks at the table have such a tough start
Last time I was this early, veil of summer was still $1.
i like the game play, just music was super bad for it.
It's rok not rik
This is not a good representation of the true power of the mime.
Crptic in mimeoplasm? Yikes. Yarok was a bit of a let down as well.
This game highlights that just because someone has a powerful deck does not mean that they are a powerful player
When the rest of the table gangs up on you and makes it an archenemy game because you built a good deck doesn't mean he isn't a powerful player. Adam did mess up by not blocking the first time but there's only so much one can do against 3 opponents. This is why combo decks suffer against creature beats. Adam had the win but it was ripped from him by the other 3 players who just wanted the game to go on longer. That doesn't really sound like fun.
I mean, the other players maybe also wanted to win and that's why they stopped him?
@@kj635 Of course. That's what needs to be done. It's just infuriating watching someone construct a good deck, pilot it pretty well, and then draw the ire of the table because their deck is doing what it needs to do to win. After a certain point, they decided that simply removing his cards wasn't enough and they needed to remove the player through the only known method this channel implores, creature beats.
@@charlesmaillho367 I don't get it. So because there's a combo player that seems to be popping off, it's unfun that the other players pull together to stop him from winning? That sounds reasonable enough to me to warrant gathering up against someone.
@@m.r.r.2636 Then you must have never been in Adam's shoes before. When it seems like the game is going in your favor and then everyone decides they don't want to play with you anymore what is fun about that?
Noice
So many poor choices of combat for adam.
Muddstah, you should know by now that all permanents owned by a losing player should be exiled :(
rule 800.4a states that: When a player leaves the game, all objects (see rule 109) owned by that player leave the game, any effects which give that player control of any objects or players end, and all spells and abilities controlled by that player on the stack cease to exist. Then, if there are any objects still controlled by that player, those objects are exiled. This is not a state-based action. It happens as soon as the player leaves the game. If the player who left the game had priority at the time he or she left, priority passes to the next player in turn order who’s still in the game.
So all the permanents of other players that were under the losing players control should've been exiled since the return trigger is removed from the stack.
I'm going to assume that this is referring to the point where someone is taken out after stealing a bunch of things?
This seems to come up a lot. There's a major different between what is "owned" and what is "controlled". The Roil Elemental stealing things would qualify under this clause: *any effects which give that player control of any objects or players end* - which means that with Adam being knocked out, so too are the effects.
This goes in to detail better than I can: blogs.magicjudges.org/rulestips/2012/08/multiplayer-monday-what-happens-when-a-player-leaves-the-game/
@@MTGMuddstah hmm looks like you are right and i was wrong. Since roil elemental doesn't specifically say that when it leaves the battlefield it returns all creatures.
I thought it was worded like oblivion ring and it would put a trigger on the stack.
So i have to apologize for implying your incompetence, when you were in fact doing the correct thing.
I mean, if it helps, you can call me out on confusing Burgeoning for Exploration.