Linux Mint 21.3 VS Ubuntu 24.04 LTS (RAM Consumption)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 39

  • @sundaramtechnologies4824
    @sundaramtechnologies4824 4 месяца назад +1

    In all of your video there is no chart display about comparisons. request to display table chart at end of video

  • @codeman99-dev
    @codeman99-dev 5 месяцев назад +8

    Totally useless comparison! Kernel 5.15 vs 6.8...
    You understand that a distribution has very little control over the ram? The only way to create an "easy on RAM distribution" is to strip out kernel modules and use applications that require less ram.
    If you run the same kernel version, desktop environment, and applications... the result will largely be the same.

    • @GIRGHGH
      @GIRGHGH 5 месяцев назад

      I mean, if they were the same in every way it would kinda defeat the purpose of doing a comparison.

  • @ЛюбаХ-б2в
    @ЛюбаХ-б2в 3 месяца назад

    Добрый день! На одну из систем можно установить такие программы как Archicad, фотошоп, Avtocad и т.д.?)

  • @themanlyman7737
    @themanlyman7737 5 месяцев назад +3

    My linux mint used 1.7 gb at idle, any idea why that is?

    • @xbeast7585
      @xbeast7585 5 месяцев назад

      maybe you've mysql and apache2 service running in the background

    • @themanlyman7737
      @themanlyman7737 5 месяцев назад

      @@xbeast7585 no it's a fresh install, but after I check using htop it is showing around 800m of usage, it is using the app system monitor that show 1.7gb

  • @chad_8313
    @chad_8313 5 месяцев назад +2

    That 5.15 kernel is ancient

    • @lowstaar
      @lowstaar 4 месяца назад

      It works

  • @kingyaya1285
    @kingyaya1285 5 месяцев назад +3

    mint is basically ubuntu under the hood.

    • @catayloprince4772
      @catayloprince4772 5 месяцев назад +1

      True. But it think is a car with custom seats and dashboard.

    • @Cyclopea56
      @Cyclopea56 5 месяцев назад

      E Ubuntu é um Debian 🔥

  • @Nin_Cada
    @Nin_Cada 5 месяцев назад +5

    Windows with idle ram of 4gb left the chat😂

  • @xritics19
    @xritics19 5 месяцев назад +3

    Well...Windows must be the fastest OS so...In fact, not at all! It's the slowest! If you have a program that drain all of your ram, this program go fast but the rest of programs not...Have a lot of ram is good but if you can't, you need to use programs or OS that don't drain your ram! This is a fact!

  • @Smjork
    @Smjork 5 месяцев назад

    Put the same kernel, the same Desktop Environment, etc, etc ... on both distros and you'll get the chance to avoid being a complete dumbass.

  • @jimw7916
    @jimw7916 5 месяцев назад +9

    The more ram consumption ..... the faster the OS I cant believe how many people still cant see this. There is no faster data reads and writes inside a computer ................... RAM is the FASTEST. The more data sitting in ram , the faster you can access it.

    • @RenderingUser
      @RenderingUser 5 месяцев назад +10

      That's a statement by people with the luxury to afford over 8 gigs of ram. Having as much free ram as possible is crucial on a lot of systems. Cause modern programs these days are huge. And having enough free ram determines whether having two apps open is super fast or super slow.
      Can't multitask when half your pc is sitting inside swap. And it's not exactly pretty when you have to deal with desktop environment data being constantly pulled from swap

    • @romulo2714
      @romulo2714 5 месяцев назад +5

      @@RenderingUser Y'know, I have 12 and I sorta still prefer the low ram consumption so my games won't stutter. When I'm gaming how fast my OS is doesn't matter that much, I'm not interacting with it's components, as longas it does the minimum to keep my game running that's fine.

    • @RenderingUser
      @RenderingUser 5 месяцев назад +3

      @@romulo2714 exactly. Idk why suddenly some people decided to get riled up and declare that it's good that all ram is being used

    • @romulo2714
      @romulo2714 5 месяцев назад +2

      @@RenderingUser Preach.

    • @jimw7916
      @jimw7916 5 месяцев назад

      @@RenderingUser thats a statement that is fact. BUY some ram

  • @davidgari3240
    @davidgari3240 5 месяцев назад

    Yeah, well Windows ME (Millenium Edition) would run fine and get out of bed quicker with 64 MEGABYTES for the entire OS.
    So, what's yer point?
    '
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Me