Hey man, thanks for making content so regularly and keeping us occupied during the quarantine. It really helps! Just don't burn yourself out. Vid was great by the way!
Easily one of the more tragic stories in BioShock.. Lamb is a monster who uses people for her own gain. Gil did everything for her and she just took advantage. The poor man only wanted to make things better in rapture..
In my opinion Alex the great was one of the most entertaining npc in Bioshock 2. The little welcome show he made for Delta, his singing, and just the way he interacted with splicers and Delta were all really hilarious
Literally one of my favourite characters in the whole series.The voice actor is perfect and his form is actually wretching. Great analysis! Can't wait till Sofia lamb breakdown.
6:48, Oh my god, is that what Gil looked like in his insane state. I'm honestly shocked right now. I've always wondered what he looked like after he went insane.😱😳😳😳
Poor Gil Alexander, your right about how he didn't deserve all this torment by Sophia Lamb. Good job on the Summary and I'll see you in the next video. :)
I spare him because I couldn't kill him. After playing Minerva's Den I found out that Tenanbaum could actually cure ADAM sickness so it is possible that she cured him as well.
So you didnt kill him cause of a "could be" Situation did you See the State He was in how could anything reverse this Mutation hes Not capable of reverting back, He tried to kill himself inside that Tank but He cant you doomed him to rot in this Tank forever after his pleads of ending his suffering....only that you can Sleep at night... how could you... Edit: ok worse you Release a insane Monster into the Sea wich has access to a Endless amount of Adam wich mutates him even further putting everyone in Danger by creating a Uncontrolable Force of Nature with the Power to level Citys You get worse by the minute
@only a comentary nothing special Mother Goose did find a way. After all the statue after you spare him shows you pulling a man from a monster so I am pretty sure he is cured eventually since ADAM has memory of past configurations. After all she can cure everything and everyone or she can kill him herself.
Not far from that place is the deep sea trench where Persephone is located. At the bottom is the glowing biomass that the sea slugs got the ability to produce ADAM from. Letting the already monstrous, insane Alex "live outside" and potentially find his way down there to a limitless supply of the stuff sounds like a bad idea to me.
Living as an Animal with a Human Consious, that sounds like Torture hes a brillant man reduced to a giant slug that eats of a Bio mass that mutates him probably further Imagine what a Monster He could become with such amounts of Adam He could rival Atlantis Leviathan
I love these videos, thank you for making them. They are beautifully presented & crafted. I love that Gil sang to stop you getting near him & started firing people left, right & center.
From what I remember, Lamb wanted to do this exact same thing to Eleanor, by pumping her full of Adam, her own “daughter” Lamb should’ve been fed to wolves, but in my playtrough she was left alive knowing all she did was for nothing, well deserved
[SPOILER] I was so confused with the moral choice you had to make over Gil, and which one was considered "good" - you have his sane persona begging you to kill him, whilst his current personally begs to live. Surely his sane mind is more capable of making decisions than his broken insane personality? I've seen a few people debating why sparing him is the "good" choice, and it's finally clicked with me. Basically, the "sane Gil" is, to all intents and purposes, dead. He's gone. His last wish is for you to destroy what he's going to become. However, the version of Gil that emerged wants to live. Even if he's stuck in a tube for the rest of his life, he desperately wants to survive.* So you have two versions, two personalities, essentially two people who are asking you to do something - end a life. Sane Gil doesn't want any part of him to exist if he becomes an insane monster, no matter what. The new Gil knows this and is aware of his new existence. Whether or not he's insane doesn't really matter to him - he wants to live. Sane Gil died a long time ago. Insane Gil still lives. So, who's actually going to be affected by your decision the most going forward? *whether he does actually survive by the end is a separate matter
That's a very good point on why sparing him is the good choice. Now, allow me to introduce my point on why not sparing him is also a good choice. You are right in one thing: the sane gil alexander is gone, basically dead at that point in the game. So i don't think we should judge him by the last wishes of the sane gil, but by the actions of the new one. (Just like we judge any other character in the game, by his actions) So, based upon the actions of this "new" identity, i don't think that leting him alive is the best choice. No matter how much he begs to live, his a freacking psycopath crazy with power that only keeps people alive as long as they have some use to him. Walking through fontaine futuristics you can find lots of corpses from people that he murdered purely out of anger or because they didn't have any more use to him, so he "fires" them (quite literally). He even names himself "alex the great" and demands everyone to obey him (when you enter the fontaine futuristics building, you can even see him murdering a splacer in cold blood just because he misspelled his name). Not to mention that once subject delta has the genetic key, gil is unconscious, but if you don't kill him, do you really think he will be jus "cool" with it? No! When he wakes up, he will probably figure out a way to fix his security bots and kill anyone that even thinks about repeating what delta did, making him even more angry and blood thirsty. But this time no one will ever find a way to kill him. Making him an even more sadistic dictator that can't be killed. Anyway you do have a good point.
Joãopedro Pelisson Well in all fairness, the main reason to go to where Alex the Great was in the first place was to get his genetics to complete some sort of key that would take you to where Eleanor and Sofia were. Once that objective was completed, he kind of became no use to anyone anymore and there’d be no reason to go to where he is. If he wants to spend an eternity all alone, that’s on him.
@@joaopedropelisson5925 Sorry for taking so long to reply! I didn't remember the exact state that Gil was left in if you spared him, but your last interaction ends with him begging for you to spare his life & vowing never to return to the outside world. If you pull the switch he is electrocuted & he's definitely fully conscious before and during that action: [bioshock.fandom.com/wiki/File:Killing_Gill_-_Bioshock_2_(HD)_Gameplay!!!] Since the other choice is to walk away, it seems that he's fully conscious when spared - you've already disconnected him from Rapture's systems (by destroying the four signal relays he used) to float in his jar for all eternity. Until everything goes kaboom, of course! Since he can no longer control anything outside his jar, he's not a threat to anyone - theoretically he could persuade someone to fix the relays for him, but the area is cut off from the rest of Rapture. All that's left are a couple of Big Daddies & a handful of totally insane splicers, neither of which would be able (or even willing) to perform such a complex & intricate a task. That said, my instinct when first playing the game followed that of many others - it feels like you should kill Gil out of mercy. But then you have to ask yourself: Who is suffering right now? Will the suffering stop if you choose to kill in the name of mercy? How likely is it that your action or inaction would result in the suffering of others? Interestingly there's one question I didn't even think of before. Have you ever heard of that moral dilemma where you're at a train junction & a control lever. Five people are tied to the tracks ahead of you & the oncoming train. You also see one tied to another track that branches off, so if you pull the lender the train will go down the branch-off instead. Your instinct might be to pull the lever (save five people at the cost of one life) but is that your choice to make? Is it morally acceptable to take an active part in someone's death, or is it better to not become involved in this horrific scenario? After all, you didn't tie those people to the tracks, someone else put this plan into motion and they're the sole reason people are going to die no matter what you do. It's hard to explain the moral dilemma of this scenario, but it's wanting you to consider whether you're willing to become a cog in this machine of death & take on the same choice as the person who caused this. If you choose to act them someone who could have lived if you didn't act, will now die because you decided to pull the lever. The single victim on the track doesn't get to choose whether or not they die for others, you're making that choice not only for the single victim, but for the other five as well as those on the train. If you choose to act & become part of the scenario, then the single victim will die because you decided to pull the lever and make it happen. You decided that those five people should be more important than the single person. What if you know a bit more about the people involved? What if the group have terminal cancer whilst the single person is a small child? What if the five people are your immediate family & the single person is a total stranger or someone you actively dislike? Why do those facts matter when it's still a case of killing one to save five? Sorry this is so long, it's just a really interesting thought experiment which is similar to your choice with Gil. Killing him means that you have to physically pull the lever & kill him with your own hand. Or do you just leave, refusing to become involved at all once you've got what you needed? Refusing to make a decision could be seen as an active decision in itself, but it gets really complicated if you want to know for certain whether refusing to get involved counts as specifically CHOOSING not to act, or if it's NOT choosing to act. So yeah, basically it can get super complicated when you think about it too much.
I only spared him so Eleanor wouldn't get the wrong idea of justice and misunderstand my intent. It is interesting in terms of narrative, but in gameplay, I do wish there was more to it. You know how Gracie would be grateful if you spared her life, making yours a bit easier later on? I kinda wish Alex The Great did that, contacting you and expressing genuine remorse about what he did, making it up to you by giving you a bit of Adam or something while in Persephone.
That was intentional. I felt that it didn't really impact the overall story of him or Bioshock 2, due to it barely being mentioned. If that makes sense.
Hey Bioshockhub, loved the video and I subbed. I was wondering if you could do a video or multiple videos such as plasmids vs vigors (which is more powerful, their history, etc.) and maybe a versus series (big daddy vs. handyman, Booker vs Jack, Delta vs Songbird, and maybe any of the Bioshock characters fighting characters from other media such as anyone from Marvel, DC, or image comics) I love binge watching the lore videos you make as I have recently gotten back into Bioshock and wanted to relearn the lore again. Keep up the good work and I can't wait to see what you do next
I have to admit that Im not sure what to do with Gil. Should I listen to the kind and intelligent man he used to be and put him out of his misery? Or should I listen to this utterly insane and cruel ( yet strangely funny and kinda charismatic ) mutant and release him? I did both but neither of those choices seemed quite right ( or quite wrong ) to me.
*Ponder this: In Minerva's Den, we are shown that there's a massive bio-luminescent biomass underneath Rapture. Supposedly this is what makes those sea slugs produce ADAM. It's been implied to be s demiurge if I read the wiki correctly.* *Now what if you let Gill live and he lives in the ocean... And then finds the biomass?*
I find it hard to terminate him even when he asks that we do. He did, however, cruel things. It is even suggested he helped make Subject Delta.What will I do that during my next playthrough?
One thing thats never touched on, is gil seems to be able to survive underwater. So would he survive in the ocean too? He even says he will live outside if you leave him alivd,but is he being honest or just crazy? Its never explained why if he could splice enough to live underwater, why didnt other splicers?
"DISMISSED! FIRED! TERMINATED!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!" I think he based his "The Great" performance on The Invisible Man. Pretty fitting, what Monocain did to Jack Griffin, Adam did to Gil Alexander. But damn, if what his normal form said about the Alpha Series is true, it really shows the consequences of even going through with the experiment. He said that Alpha Series were designed to feel crippling despair when something bad happens to a Little Sister, or otherwise when they are no longer considered Little Sisters. And keep in mind, you fight a near endless supply of them in the finale. Unless they happen to be using vita stations, just imagine how many Little Sisters were lost. Gil's absence in Infinite is depressing since he was such an important part of the lore.
It’s sad that happened but how is it that he got that large and why didn’t that happen to Fontaine since they both had massive amounts of Adam in their body.
Spoiler! Do you think it was right to kill Gil in the game? On the diary he left he begged for peace so I personally did it. But the game treats this as a horrible act. I thought it was a kindness but what do you think?
It felt wrong Not releasing Gilbert of his pitiful existence and pain it May not ease Our own mind but that man has suffered enough it would be cruel Not to kill him in the end
Yes, your right Gil Alexander and Dr. Suchong are brave scientist and created new technology and prototypes Big Daddies. I think I wound spare Gil's life, he making great things. Lamb was responsible for this, not Gil.
Do you happen to have a video on Big Daddy development? Like the chronology of how the models of the Big Daddies came to be and the development of their bonding procedures with Little Sisters? (I don’t even know if there’s enough information in the lore to even do that) Great video by the way!
Hey man, thanks for making content so regularly and keeping us occupied during the quarantine. It really helps! Just don't burn yourself out. Vid was great by the way!
You're very welcome my friend. I'm going to do everything I can to try and make it easier for everyone to be entertained. Thank you so much.
Easily one of the more tragic stories in BioShock.. Lamb is a monster who uses people for her own gain. Gil did everything for her and she just took advantage. The poor man only wanted to make things better in rapture..
It's indeed a heavy blow in terms of a backstory. That's for sure.
In my opinion Alex the great was one of the most entertaining npc in Bioshock 2.
The little welcome show he made for Delta, his singing, and just the way he interacted with splicers and Delta were all really hilarious
He was a very interesting character.
“All I can say is... Adam is one hell of a drug.” -TheBioshockhub, 2020
Yessir lol.
TheBioshockHub 😂😂😂🤣Keep up the great work man.
@@sora034
But isnt Adam the Drug?
Yes adam is a drug lol 🧬🩸💊
I remembered there's an audio diary of him regretting having not recognized Eleanor Lamb and turning her into a little sister.
Literally one of my favourite characters in the whole series.The voice actor is perfect and his form is actually wretching. Great analysis! Can't wait till Sofia lamb breakdown.
I'm really glad you enjoyed the video! And he became one of my favorites as well.
6:48, Oh my god, is that what Gil looked like in his insane state. I'm honestly shocked right now. I've always wondered what he looked like after he went insane.😱😳😳😳
It's disturbing honestly.
The irony is that his recorded tapes pleading someone to end his life. Now he's pleaded for his life asking me to spare him.
Especially since he had just lost everything again and he’s apologizing
Poor Gil Alexander, your right about how he didn't deserve all this torment by Sophia Lamb. Good job on the Summary and I'll see you in the next video. :)
I'm glad you enjoyed the video :) Also, thank you for the kind comment.
He did it of his own volition... that woman's influence and way with words were more powerful than all of Rapture's steel and fire.
@@benmccarthy353 Yeah but she manipulated him which resulted in him being in the mess to begin with.
I spare him because I couldn't kill him. After playing Minerva's Den I found out that Tenanbaum could actually cure ADAM sickness so it is possible that she cured him as well.
So you didnt kill him cause of a "could be" Situation did you See the State He was in how could anything reverse this Mutation hes Not capable of reverting back, He tried to kill himself inside that Tank but He cant you doomed him to rot in this Tank forever after his pleads of ending his suffering....only that you can Sleep at night...
how could you...
Edit: ok worse you Release a insane Monster into the Sea wich has access to a Endless amount of Adam wich mutates him even further putting everyone in Danger by creating a Uncontrolable Force of Nature with the Power to level Citys
You get worse by the minute
@only a comentary nothing special Mother Goose did find a way. After all the statue after you spare him shows you pulling a man from a monster so I am pretty sure he is cured eventually since ADAM has memory of past configurations. After all she can cure everything and everyone or she can kill him herself.
@@onlyacomentarynothingspeci2419 it's not real son. You can calm down.
I wonder if Gilbert lived in the canonical ending
It would probably depend on what the player chose to do, I'd imagine at least.
Gill was the guy you started out hating but ending up wanting to help out in the end
Bioshock story depth in 1 & 2 is absolutely insane
Great video!
6:46
Boy does Clive Barker and H.P. Lovecraft must be so proud of their life's work right now.
I couldn't wait to deal with Sophia after this.
Thank you so much! I have been asking this for so long.
You're very welcome.
Not far from that place is the deep sea trench where Persephone is located. At the bottom is the glowing biomass that the sea slugs got the ability to produce ADAM from. Letting the already monstrous, insane Alex "live outside" and potentially find his way down there to a limitless supply of the stuff sounds like a bad idea to me.
Living as an Animal with a Human Consious, that sounds like Torture hes a brillant man reduced to a giant slug that eats of a Bio mass that mutates him probably further
Imagine what a Monster He could become with such amounts of Adam He could rival Atlantis Leviathan
I'm really glad that you keep the Bioshock videos even years after; you are the reason I enjoy these game more!
And I love making the videos for people to enjoy :)
I love these videos, thank you for making them. They are beautifully presented & crafted. I love that Gil sang to stop you getting near him & started firing people left, right & center.
this channel deserves to be more relevant. thank you for what you do. by FAR my fav rpg.
Thank you very much my friend.
From what I remember, Lamb wanted to do this exact same thing to Eleanor, by pumping her full of Adam, her own “daughter”
Lamb should’ve been fed to wolves, but in my playtrough she was left alive knowing all she did was for nothing, well deserved
That still shot of Gill reminds me of the Navigators from DUNE
[SPOILER]
I was so confused with the moral choice you had to make over Gil, and which one was considered "good" - you have his sane persona begging you to kill him, whilst his current personally begs to live. Surely his sane mind is more capable of making decisions than his broken insane personality?
I've seen a few people debating why sparing him is the "good" choice, and it's finally clicked with me.
Basically, the "sane Gil" is, to all intents and purposes, dead. He's gone. His last wish is for you to destroy what he's going to become.
However, the version of Gil that emerged wants to live. Even if he's stuck in a tube for the rest of his life, he desperately wants to survive.*
So you have two versions, two personalities, essentially two people who are asking you to do something - end a life.
Sane Gil doesn't want any part of him to exist if he becomes an insane monster, no matter what.
The new Gil knows this and is aware of his new existence. Whether or not he's insane doesn't really matter to him - he wants to live.
Sane Gil died a long time ago.
Insane Gil still lives.
So, who's actually going to be affected by your decision the most going forward?
*whether he does actually survive by the end is a separate matter
That's a very good point on why sparing him is the good choice. Now, allow me to introduce my point on why not sparing him is also a good choice.
You are right in one thing: the sane gil alexander is gone, basically dead at that point in the game. So i don't think we should judge him by the last wishes of the sane gil, but by the actions of the new one. (Just like we judge any other character in the game, by his actions)
So, based upon the actions of this "new" identity, i don't think that leting him alive is the best choice. No matter how much he begs to live, his a freacking psycopath crazy with power that only keeps people alive as long as they have some use to him. Walking through fontaine futuristics you can find lots of corpses from people that he murdered purely out of anger or because they didn't have any more use to him, so he "fires" them (quite literally).
He even names himself "alex the great" and demands everyone to obey him (when you enter the fontaine futuristics building, you can even see him murdering a splacer in cold blood just because he misspelled his name).
Not to mention that once subject delta has the genetic key, gil is unconscious, but if you don't kill him, do you really think he will be jus "cool" with it? No! When he wakes up, he will probably figure out a way to fix his security bots and kill anyone that even thinks about repeating what delta did, making him even more angry and blood thirsty. But this time no one will ever find a way to kill him. Making him an even more sadistic dictator that can't be killed.
Anyway you do have a good point.
Joãopedro Pelisson Well in all fairness, the main reason to go to where Alex the Great was in the first place was to get his genetics to complete some sort of key that would take you to where Eleanor and Sofia were. Once that objective was completed, he kind of became no use to anyone anymore and there’d be no reason to go to where he is.
If he wants to spend an eternity all alone, that’s on him.
@@joaopedropelisson5925 Sorry for taking so long to reply! I didn't remember the exact state that Gil was left in if you spared him, but your last interaction ends with him begging for you to spare his life & vowing never to return to the outside world. If you pull the switch he is electrocuted & he's definitely fully conscious before and during that action: [bioshock.fandom.com/wiki/File:Killing_Gill_-_Bioshock_2_(HD)_Gameplay!!!]
Since the other choice is to walk away, it seems that he's fully conscious when spared - you've already disconnected him from Rapture's systems (by destroying the four signal relays he used) to float in his jar for all eternity. Until everything goes kaboom, of course!
Since he can no longer control anything outside his jar, he's not a threat to anyone - theoretically he could persuade someone to fix the relays for him, but the area is cut off from the rest of Rapture. All that's left are a couple of Big Daddies & a handful of totally insane splicers, neither of which would be able (or even willing) to perform such a complex & intricate a task.
That said, my instinct when first playing the game followed that of many others - it feels like you should kill Gil out of mercy. But then you have to ask yourself: Who is suffering right now? Will the suffering stop if you choose to kill in the name of mercy? How likely is it that your action or inaction would result in the suffering of others?
Interestingly there's one question I didn't even think of before. Have you ever heard of that moral dilemma where you're at a train junction & a control lever. Five people are tied to the tracks ahead of you & the oncoming train. You also see one tied to another track that branches off, so if you pull the lender the train will go down the branch-off instead. Your instinct might be to pull the lever (save five people at the cost of one life) but is that your choice to make? Is it morally acceptable to take an active part in someone's death, or is it better to not become involved in this horrific scenario? After all, you didn't tie those people to the tracks, someone else put this plan into motion and they're the sole reason people are going to die no matter what you do.
It's hard to explain the moral dilemma of this scenario, but it's wanting you to consider whether you're willing to become a cog in this machine of death & take on the same choice as the person who caused this. If you choose to act them someone who could have lived if you didn't act, will now die because you decided to pull the lever. The single victim on the track doesn't get to choose whether or not they die for others, you're making that choice not only for the single victim, but for the other five as well as those on the train. If you choose to act & become part of the scenario, then the single victim will die because you decided to pull the lever and make it happen. You decided that those five people should be more important than the single person. What if you know a bit more about the people involved?
What if the group have terminal cancer whilst the single person is a small child?
What if the five people are your immediate family & the single person is a total stranger or someone you actively dislike? Why do those facts matter when it's still a case of killing one to save five?
Sorry this is so long, it's just a really interesting thought experiment which is similar to your choice with Gil. Killing him means that you have to physically pull the lever & kill him with your own hand. Or do you just leave, refusing to become involved at all once you've got what you needed? Refusing to make a decision could be seen as an active decision in itself, but it gets really complicated if you want to know for certain whether refusing to get involved counts as specifically CHOOSING not to act, or if it's NOT choosing to act.
So yeah, basically it can get super complicated when you think about it too much.
I only spared him so Eleanor wouldn't get the wrong idea of justice and misunderstand my intent. It is interesting in terms of narrative, but in gameplay, I do wish there was more to it. You know how Gracie would be grateful if you spared her life, making yours a bit easier later on? I kinda wish Alex The Great did that, contacting you and expressing genuine remorse about what he did, making it up to you by giving you a bit of Adam or something while in Persephone.
Great video man !
your fired! fired! fireeed!
Another great one!!!
You skipped the part where he fell in love with Lamb but she rejected him
That was intentional. I felt that it didn't really impact the overall story of him or Bioshock 2, due to it barely being mentioned. If that makes sense.
@@TheBioshockHub I understand but I thought it was one of the main reasons he was so devoted to her.
@@blackkitty369 That was partly the reason, the other was a dedication to bettering Rapture.
@@TheBioshockHub True.
That could also be a reason why he chose to be her experiment in order to show her that he can sacrifice himself for her
Never clicked on a video so fast. Am so interested in this Character, Thank You.
You're very welcome!
Im only sparing him for the Trophie when I eventually go back give him the mercy.
Another great lore video
Thank you amigo.
Alex the great seriously reminds me of those computer doctors from Fallout NV: Dr. Mobius and Dr. Klein
This is one of the sadder lore videos
I agree.
Great video
Thank ya!
Hey Bioshockhub, loved the video and I subbed. I was wondering if you could do a video or multiple videos such as plasmids vs vigors (which is more powerful, their history, etc.) and maybe a versus series (big daddy vs. handyman, Booker vs Jack, Delta vs Songbird, and maybe any of the Bioshock characters fighting characters from other media such as anyone from Marvel, DC, or image comics) I love binge watching the lore videos you make as I have recently gotten back into Bioshock and wanted to relearn the lore again. Keep up the good work and I can't wait to see what you do next
and he really looks like edward bernays
the game sees killing him as the evil choice
I have to admit that Im not sure what to do with Gil. Should I listen to the kind and intelligent man he used to be and put him out of his misery? Or should I listen to this utterly insane and cruel ( yet strangely funny and kinda charismatic ) mutant and release him? I did both but neither of those choices seemed quite right ( or quite wrong ) to me.
It's definitely a moral choice question.
*Ponder this: In Minerva's Den, we are shown that there's a massive bio-luminescent biomass underneath Rapture. Supposedly this is what makes those sea slugs produce ADAM. It's been implied to be s demiurge if I read the wiki correctly.*
*Now what if you let Gill live and he lives in the ocean... And then finds the biomass?*
That would turn him into some sort of insane monster type character, I think.
Great video as always
Thank you very much Drake.
Love your content my guy
Love the support :)
i agree with grant Erik thanks for entertaining us you don't have to but that's very much appericated
Gil Alexander was one of the nice's people entire Game
Forgot to comment. Watched this. Was really good. 😁
Thank you Jess!
I find it hard to terminate him even when he asks that we do. He did, however, cruel things. It is even suggested he helped make Subject Delta.What will I do that during my next playthrough?
One thing thats never touched on, is gil seems to be able to survive underwater. So would he survive in the ocean too? He even says he will live outside if you leave him alivd,but is he being honest or just crazy? Its never explained why if he could splice enough to live underwater, why didnt other splicers?
very informative and good pacing!
Thank you amigo.
@@TheBioshockHub of course dude!
"DISMISSED! FIRED! TERMINATED!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!" I think he based his "The Great" performance on The Invisible Man. Pretty fitting, what Monocain did to Jack Griffin, Adam did to Gil Alexander. But damn, if what his normal form said about the Alpha Series is true, it really shows the consequences of even going through with the experiment. He said that Alpha Series were designed to feel crippling despair when something bad happens to a Little Sister, or otherwise when they are no longer considered Little Sisters. And keep in mind, you fight a near endless supply of them in the finale. Unless they happen to be using vita stations, just imagine how many Little Sisters were lost. Gil's absence in Infinite is depressing since he was such an important part of the lore.
Request:What if subject delta survived in bioshock 2
It’s sad that happened but how is it that he got that large and why didn’t that happen to Fontaine since they both had massive amounts of Adam in their body.
Well Fontaine got bigger and gray hahahaha.
With all that exposure to Adam, it really makes me wonder how frank Fontaine didn't end up like Gibert.
Can you Ranking Bioshock games from best to worst pls
Sure. That might be a bit as I'm working on other videos at the moment, but I can definitely do that.
Your videos are really cool and interesting
I'm glad you enjoy them!
Spoiler! Do you think it was right to kill Gil in the game? On the diary he left he begged for peace so I personally did it. But the game treats this as a horrible act. I thought it was a kindness but what do you think?
Personally, I do. He was in a lot of pain from the experiment, so I think putting him out of his misery was for the best.
It felt wrong Not releasing Gilbert of his pitiful existence and pain it May not ease Our own mind but that man has suffered enough it would be cruel Not to kill him in the end
Yes, your right Gil Alexander and Dr. Suchong are brave scientist and created new technology and prototypes Big Daddies. I think I wound spare Gil's life, he making great things. Lamb was responsible for this, not Gil.
Lamb is evil.
Phantom Eye Were you the one who commented on all the ytp collabs from a few years back?
He is the only main npc that I kill
Same. I feel he's already suffered enough.
TheBioshockHub First playthough of bioshock 2 I killed everyone because I just wanted to beat the game
Agnus Dei.
FIRED
@@TheBioshockHub 😄 AcCesS gRanTed.
Can you make a video for Songbird?
Sure! It just might take a bit, if that's okay.
After you cover so many characters; I’d like to see what would you do if you were that character ex. what would you do if u r Jack
CLOSURE!
"Fired...Fired... FIRED"
😂 idk why but i dont saw the scene with gil alaxender i walked and searched him but he doesn't Show so I played and saved elenor
Do you happen to have a video on Big Daddy development? Like the chronology of how the models of the Big Daddies came to be and the development of their bonding procedures with Little Sisters? (I don’t even know if there’s enough information in the lore to even do that) Great video by the way!
ruclips.net/video/hrXxCHRwstg/видео.html
(I hope this is okay for now)
Hello...
Hello there.
First let me say as a long time BioShock fan I love your work. Second I must say I hate Sofia lamb so much.
Thank you for the support and I agree about Lamb. Sorry for the delayed reply!
@@TheBioshockHub No need for the apology I'm glad you responded. Makes me inspired to start my own BioShock channel :)
who is worse, comstock or sofia lamb
Both are terrible.
That's just fucked up and sad man
6:48 so...that is he look like in the tank...jesus...
Oof! That's heavy dude
Even though this was a bit of a shorter lore video, it packs a punch for sure.