Yesss, Haxo Gambit. I play this with white I'm 1350 and I get that exact sequence of moves that you showed consistently. If the king goes back to e1, you can throw in Qh5+ to induce the weakening move g6 before taking the bishop. 👍
I already knew these tips by myself because I have a ton of experience with openings, I totally agree with you and this is a great educational video. Sometimes I reinvent the wheel, but I never do it during games only in my studies and with the engine analysis, like for example I have some lines that have never been played before in the London, saving them for tournament OTB games (hopefully my future opponents don't read my comment 😂)
I am not sure about the decimal point stuff. Some of the lines I play today are lines that back in the stockfish 9/10 used to give small advantages but now with modern stockfish are not even top lines any more. I am not changing my lines based on a minimal engine fluctuation.
6:26 funny, I play this exact line with black. I go for 8...Ng4?, which is the only full on trick in my opening repertoire. Of course I generally don't like moves like this and I've looked at 8...d6 too, but the 70+% win rate speaks for itself.
Hi Jack, great video! I was wondering, as someone who is approaching 2400 in rapid, do you see yourself moving to blitz soon? There must be so few players in the pool and so many cheaters at that level...
probably not, i don't really like Blitz nor am i naturally fast. i'm trying to play more OTB which is what i'm investing most of my time into - i probably do more studying than i do playing games atm.
its called the Haxo Gambit in the Scotch Gambit. the theory isn't really important though, just highlighting that if you closely follow theory you'll get deliberate advantages. but if you play systematic openings you don't get these same consistent opportunities.
It's killer. I play the Haxo Gambit, and I get crushing attacks all the time. You don't have to be lucky to execute the trap, Ive had the exact sequence he showed in at least 10 of my last 100 games.
generally this would be my rule of thumb with white: any gambit that is worse than -0.5 shouldn't be played with black: any gambit that is worse than +0.8 shouldn't be played of course its all up to you but those would be my recommendations. if you are going to go for something with a bad evaluation make sure its extremely niche so your opponent won't know the theory.
I know I'm only 1600, but I don't think not using openings of your own style against much higher-rated players is beneficial. In a way you hinder your own opening development by defaulting to simpler openings against them. The example you mentioned describes me perfectly: I play the Sicilian, and there is no way I would default to a Caro just because my opponent is let's say 2100. (Also, I don't think checking you opponent's rating is beneficial for most players, I for one usually only check before the end of my games when the oppoment might offer a draw or when I might get into a time scramble.) Otherwise great vid, I'm glad I found this channel!
I follow this principle in chess. -- Develop pieces to best places when opponent waste tempo . I mostly wins a pawn or a piece till Endgame come. My rapid chess rating is 1900 .
Nice video! As an ~1550 player now, I can no longer find suitable materials like this easily. Thanks and please keep on!!
That Lichess Opening Puzzle Is just what I exactly need. Thank you Jacksark you're a hero!
thanks for this video. after watching this video i finally reached 1900elo. i was suck at 2000elo from years
😂🎉
Yesss, Haxo Gambit. I play this with white I'm 1350 and I get that exact sequence of moves that you showed consistently. If the king goes back to e1, you can throw in Qh5+ to induce the weakening move g6 before taking the bishop. 👍
I already knew these tips by myself because I have a ton of experience with openings, I totally agree with you and this is a great educational video.
Sometimes I reinvent the wheel, but I never do it during games only in my studies and with the engine analysis, like for example I have some lines that have never been played before in the London, saving them for tournament OTB games (hopefully my future opponents don't read my comment 😂)
A very educative video, keep it up Jack!
Thanks for cranking out the videos recently Jack! Been taking notes and hope to cross 2000 soon.
I am not sure about the decimal point stuff. Some of the lines I play today are lines that back in the stockfish 9/10 used to give small advantages but now with modern stockfish are not even top lines any more. I am not changing my lines based on a minimal engine fluctuation.
I love your videos man! I always learn so much.
6:26 funny, I play this exact line with black. I go for 8...Ng4?, which is the only full on trick in my opening repertoire. Of course I generally don't like moves like this and I've looked at 8...d6 too, but the 70+% win rate speaks for itself.
The who gambit? I could not catch the name of the positional gambit you mentioned around 11:00 minutes.
@@ChessWithMouselip Chepukaitis Gambit 🔥🔥
Jack how ur rapid rating is way higher compared to ur blitz rating 😭
i swear 90% of my Blitz losses are me getting flagged tbh 😭😭
The arsenal delusion has turned into chess delusion now with that thumbnail mate. 💀😂
shush bro i’m manifesting 2400
the best is just to memorize the exact moves you need to play in every position
i saw jack's new video, i click it
Hope this helps currently 1950+ being stuck here for quite time is hassle lol
Jack I miss watching you grind on rapid😭
Hi Jack, great video! I was wondering, as someone who is approaching 2400 in rapid, do you see yourself moving to blitz soon? There must be so few players in the pool and so many cheaters at that level...
probably not, i don't really like Blitz nor am i naturally fast. i'm trying to play more OTB which is what i'm investing most of my time into - i probably do more studying than i do playing games atm.
yeah what the hell was that first scotch gambit? you have to show all the moves man
its called the Haxo Gambit in the Scotch Gambit. the theory isn't really important though, just highlighting that if you closely follow theory you'll get deliberate advantages. but if you play systematic openings you don't get these same consistent opportunities.
Google is free yk...
It's killer. I play the Haxo Gambit, and I get crushing attacks all the time. You don't have to be lucky to execute the trap, Ive had the exact sequence he showed in at least 10 of my last 100 games.
Did you forget to edit the retries out?
do you have the timestamp? hahhha i’ve alrdy edited out 2 of them since the videos been up 😭😭
Thank you sir
at 8:49 Matrix code was altered
😭😭 i always worry this happens without me noticing
Lol
14:04 wtf happened here
noooo theres 2 of them in this video 😭😭😭 my stutter being exposed
W consistent videos
I didn't understanded name of positnoal gambit can any one tell me
the Chepukaitis Gambit in the Trompowsky, super cool line
10:40 blackmar diemar gambit is in this list right?
generally this would be my rule of thumb
with white: any gambit that is worse than -0.5 shouldn't be played
with black: any gambit that is worse than +0.8 shouldn't be played
of course its all up to you but those would be my recommendations. if you are going to go for something with a bad evaluation make sure its extremely niche so your opponent won't know the theory.
@jacksarkisian thanks
Then you got the Stafford over here with +1.8 lol
blackmar diemer gambit is -0.6
@tiberiusClark5362 it is playable for me
Bro lagged at 8:49
This guy’s accent is as weird as mine…and I’m also from Adelaide.
Liked and subscribed ♟️💯👌👍
Dude youre like the Magnus Carlson of covid chess boomers
11:46 who plays Bf4 breyer 💀💀
Third*
🥉🥉
I know I'm only 1600, but I don't think not using openings of your own style against much higher-rated players is beneficial. In a way you hinder your own opening development by defaulting to simpler openings against them. The example you mentioned describes me perfectly: I play the Sicilian, and there is no way I would default to a Caro just because my opponent is let's say 2100. (Also, I don't think checking you opponent's rating is beneficial for most players, I for one usually only check before the end of my games when the oppoment might offer a draw or when I might get into a time scramble.) Otherwise great vid, I'm glad I found this channel!
clickbait. jack isn't 2400. unsubbed.
Bruh...
soon bro i'm less than 50 elo away 😭
"GET A LIFE"
2400 rapid is like at least NM level or above. Time to get a title Jack!
@@Stxzrm "GET A LIFE B@ZO"
I follow this principle in chess.
-- Develop pieces to best places when opponent waste tempo .
I mostly wins a pawn or a piece till Endgame come.
My rapid chess rating is 1900 .
Checking miss & accuracies leads to boring and chess engine type of games.
Check only for blunders & mistakes.
First
🥇🥇
Pair your chsnnel with Alex B and zero reason any competent player shouldnt make 2000
@jacksarkisian
Where is this mistake a tron?
first link in the description bro ❤️
first
🥈🥈