ATF Demonstration Backfires! (Attempts To Make Guns Look “Bad”)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 мар 2024
- ▶ FREE Gun Law Map: uscca.co/OMlp
▶ Join USCCA + Get Free Handgun Case: uscca.co/OM7N
This video is for educational purposes.
-------------
Must-Watch Interviews With Gun Owners Who Used Their Firearm In Self-Defense:
(Raw Video) Lyft Driver Destroys 2 Armed Robbers Trying To Steal His Car...
Watch it here ▶ • (Raw Video) Lyft Drive...
Gun Owner Loses Everything Because...
Watch it here ▶ • Gun Owner Loses Everyt...
Gun Owner Protects Loved Ones And Gets Locked Up (Self Defense Story)
Watch it here ▶ • Gun Owner Protects Lov...
He Was FORCED To Shoot 2 Armed Robbers To Save His Kids...
Watch it here ▶ • He Was FORCED To Shoot...
▶ FREE Gun Law Map: uscca.co/OMlp
▶ Join USCCA + Get Free Handgun Case: uscca.co/OM7N
There is something here that I have noticed and have been saying for a while now in regard to school / mass shootings and the ar/15. Have you noticed that in these school/mass shootings that the Ar15 used was always a stock version?
these individuals had gone through extensive planning to perpetuate their crime. So I'm expected to believe that it never occurred to any of them that a stock ar15 might not be the best choice and that modifying one with a short barrel, a forward grip or the parts to fully automate them would be far more efficient for making a higher kill ratio?
Thar just doesn't make any sense to me.
School shootings are most likely due to bullying and bad parenting and underdeveloped schooling. as we see today in most our representatives of state as-well many groups out today manners have gone out the door. Example - waiting for someone to finish speaking before you speak.
Example - if your not going to say something nice don’t say anything at all
Schooling wise- while the education system currently provides valuable knowledge the key aspect it’s missing is how to implement it.
Example- gen z thinks they weren’t taught how to do their taxes
@jackblack9208 Don't give them any ideas.... just saying.
@@jackblack9208The ATF Do not have authority or any rights to make any decision on firearms. Because they don't have the authority to do so at all. Because it It's protected under the second amendment in the Constitution, which second amendment is right to bear arms, the ATF Can Not make no decisions on any firearm as For the school shootings that is all on the cops Because his are private example. Cops was rather stay outside of a school taking selfies with their thumbs up each other's butts and their hands in each other's pockets. While innocent, children and teachers again taken away from their loved ones and get in hurt. And another school incident happened in Texas again, where the cops never showed up. Cause they were a bunch of cowards that are afraid of their own shadow decided to take selfies with each other again with the thumbs up each other's butts and the hands in each other's pockets. Why innocent children and teachers again hurt and get taken away from their loved ones. The ATF doesn't know nothing about guns And it's not the gun's fault. The guns can't get up and hurt somebody. Only the person behind the firearm can hurt somebody. The ATF are a bunch of oxymorons that couldn't find their way out of a Wet paper bag but holes in it That's how stupid the ATF is
that is nothing but a lie about the switch.
All they proved is that the ATF should not be allowed to handle guns.
All they proved was gun owners know more about guns and how to handle them than the ATF does. Sorry but I'll trust my dog with a gun more than those two morons.
the video looked like a monkey trying to F*** a football
*MOST ACCURATE COMMENT TO DATE!!!* 💯
AMEN!
100% Accurate
The reason I will never trust them is that they talk about criminals and citizens all as the same base.
I get your point but criminal are also citizens. Committing a crime doesn’t make you not a citizen. And being a citizen doesn’t mean you’re not a criminal. These things have no correlation.
@@JJohnson313 Law abiding citizens people who actually follow the rules are getting harassed rather than the criminals is what I think he meant to write.
@@JJohnson313 the sarcasm wasn’t needed. You know wtf I was talking about. This is why this crap is always an unnecessary argument in court
Limousine liberals view ownership of firearms as a criminal act.
They don’t want us shooting straight because they may end up being the targets if they keep going down the path they’re going. Straight up.
Having the ATF director be a guy who is obviously terrified of guns and very anti 2A is an absolutely horrible and oppressive idea
Exactly what they wanted.
He's a lawyer...enough said.
All they proved is that their experts wouldnt even pass a basic competency test...
The director can not even differentiate between shaking his head or nodding in response to a question: :"You're seeing this on the rise with gangs..."
Director *moves his box of rock in a circular fashion
I don’t understand why nobody ever talks about the fact that after fighting off a tyrannical English government the people demanded the 2nd amendment before they would ratify the constitution.
And the 2nd is not for hunting!
@@BDAILY365 Even if you choose to use a 50 BMG 😜
It doesn't fit into their gun control, disarm Americans agenda. What stupid puppets these people are.
I don't understand why all 2A supporters haven't ditched USCCA after their turn around on policy holders for political optics(before any verdict is in for that matter).
off topic : did that to mess with those walking by the way on that delivery day that were trying to bother, not affiliated with anything or associated with them. just happened to like the lyrics and beat and the a/c was on while feeling over exhausted and sweaty. pass it on
There's No Such Thing As An Expert In The ATF.
Ex - - - has been , use to be ; xs - pert - - - a spray of liquid , a squirt
Experts in tyranny I would argue.
@@TheSakufighter I Can't Argue That.
There might be some experts there, but they are being told what to say, which is what the anti-gun people and the Biden admin want to hear.
They're ALL experts at gaslighting!🤪
Gov: *creates law with specific rules*
Gun owner: *complies*
Gov: HEY, that’s a loophole!
The firearms 'expert' isn't answering questions with much confidence.
Hunting should never come up in a conversation about the second amendment.
Yeah, I don't know why everyone thinks it says " the right to own hunting rifles"...
Hunting is part of the 2nd Amendment. There I just did it.
@@rustyhighlander786 Hunting and guns go hand in hand son. It is our heritage. It is our son’s future. Literally tens of thousands of our constitutional rights are NOT explicitly stated for obvious reasons. That is the genius of our US Constitution. Unlike the bible or the quran.
@@mrsmartypants_1 just so you know and won't say foolish things in the future, Jesus actually proclaimed arms ownership as a vital part of existence due to the right of self defense which God recognized as law.
The statements Jesus made concerning this put it above governmental law, since he did not quantify it to national origin or citizenship, but stated "any man". At the time weapons(swords) ownership was largely restricted by the Roman Empire to Roman citizens only, or those given government permission. Roman protections for citizens was also such that a land owner could slay an imperial soldier on the spot if he caught the soldier stealing crops from his land. The fact that we have a second amendment came straight from the Bible as a check against government.
Next time before you try to boast over the Bible, you might want to actually read it so you understand what you are saying. Every right we have proceeds from God and the Biblical understanding our founding fathers had.
@@mrsmartypants_1 They bring up hunting to undermine every other part of the 2nd amendment. They pretend its the purpose of it and not a secondary part of owning a gun.
It’s funny how they always somehow see "hunting" in the Second Amendment despite it not being there, yet somehow can’t see "shall not be infringed", which IS clearly there…
The 2nd Amendment is about the people protecting themselves from a tyrannical government. If things keep going the way they are. We the people are going to have to do just that.
They bring up hunting while talking and pretending it's about criminals they don't even hide it
@@jeff1806 Exactly
@@jeff1806we are already there...........................................
what does infringed mean?
"big gun scary
guns are dangerous, so civilians shouldn't have them, but cartels should"
-ATF
"Terrorist is the calculated use of violence, or the threat of violence, to attain political goals through fear, intimidation or coercion" please explain how this does not describe the ATF? Also point to the explicitly enumerated power that allows their existence.
It describes any government.
Yes, an 18 year old can fire a rifle…many are taught in our great armed forces and entrusted with our security.
And have fully automatic rifles, translated to “big scary magazine clip holders that can unload any amount of bullets in half a second with its bump stock switchinator clipazine”
@@johndolenc7658While an AR15 is not considered an assault rifle, okay At all, so people need to stop thinking that AR15 is a misalt rifle cause stupid. People don't know nothing about guns and stupid people should shut their mouths
@@yoo7307 funny thing is there is no such thing as a "assault refile" never has been. same thing for a "sniper rifle" no such thing. any weapon used in the act of assaulting a building or compound is considered a assault weapon for the duration of the action then it is back to being what it was before. as for a "sniper rifle" is any rifle used by a sniper for the intended purpose of sniping out side of that it is just a rifle. Politics and the media keep taking military terminology and twisting it to suit their own purposes.
hell, even 17 year olds can get into the army and learn how to fire a weapon. saw that in my time during Basic Training in the Army.
@@svartrbrisingr6141 Same bruh. Just last year even. Some of those kids never should be given a weapon in the first place. I was so frustrated watching them...but maybe the Army can change that.
$200 tax on a Constitutional right. What next? Speech, voting, church, meeting with friends?
Have to correct you. It isn't a Constitutional right. It Constitutionally PROTECTED. If they give it, they can take it. They never gave it. It was and is ours. The Constitution reminds them they CAN NOT take it.
…. Ever heard of the Boston tea party
That's the plan.
They test ran that a few years ago so it’s not too far off.
Correct
No one has to make the ATF look stupid. They are experts on that. Lmao!
I worked in a restaurant. They hired a new manager. By his choice, he first worked 3 days in every position at the restaurant, including dishwasher. He said if he was going to be in charge, he wanted to know about each aspect he was in charge of. ATF should try doing the same thing. BTW, he was a great manager.
It’s all about continuing the fallacy that “danger” goes with the weapon and not the person wielding it.
Exactly, none of my inanimate objects have ever taken action without me initiating the action which I was responsible for effecting.
I was once looking to see how my toast was coming along.
Just then, the toaster popped off, and the toast hit my eye.
I considered that to be assault, therefore the toaster was a dangerous assault toaster, and I wanted the government to ban it.
But they said, “Don’t be silly, it’s just a toaster.”
Then, I painted the toaster black and retrofitted it with a tactical plug thingy.
The next day a swat team raided my house and confiscated my “extra super scary dangerous tactical assault toaster”.
Keep in mind its only dangerous if you don't pay the tax on it
EXACTLY !
The sleepy joe and the ATF just want money to fund thier proxy wars and corporate cronies
Extortion fee
@@Loli_lover206 💯 percent
I wrote a very pointed and lengthy letter to Mr. Dettlebach several months ago, accusing him and the agency he runs of multiple violations of Constitutional rights. Specifically, I questioned under what authority his agency even exists, since it has no Constitutional authority to regulate alcohol, tobacco, or explosives, and is explicitly forbidden from regulating/licensing/restricting firearms in any way. I got no response, as expected.
So what now
@@jman1989 hope Congress does the right thing and either defunds the ATF or abolishes it as being unconstitutional.
@@maratb5291 hope? We are going to war I guess
You wasted your time lol
They ask that you PAY for the right to be first on a list of gun owners to be forcefully disarmed when the laws allowing them to move forward inevitably pass
This is what Australia did, asked the government to let them PAY to be on a hitlist for when guns are fully banned. Totally legit, legal owners registered in a database at all times that knows all the things you do related to it, you pay for that disgusting privelage and then the people wonder why men won't stop to help a random person being mugged in the street, there's no way we'd take a risk of being stabbed/shot by a criminal with an illegal weapon when we can't own one ourselves let alone defend ourselves.
Fight for your 2A, because our older generations gave up our rights for a little comfort, the cowards.
Seems like a prime example of fake it until you make it. Each of these folks made the mistake of going public where the eyes of the real can call their bluff.
Cause the cartels are very careful about not breaking the atf rules...
😂😂😂 RIGHT!!!
Yup they don't have to be when the ATF helps arm them 😂
TRUE PATRIOTS 😂
Almost all crime committed with a firearm was committed with guns that were not acquired legally and if we do away with the second amendment these people will still have ways to get these firearms. Like how hard is this to understand?
No firearm I've ever purchased came with "intent" in the box.
The reason the "expert" couldn't disassemble the glock was because the one he struggled with had a switch on it, you can't disassemble a glock with a switch on it until you put the switch into semi auto mode instead of giggle mode. I've never owned or used a switch and even I know this, the expert isn't truly an expert and made an ass out of himself and the director and I loved every second of it.
Ditto!!! It's almost like watching an old Laurel & Hardy film or Dumb & Dumberer. It still cracks me up a month later! 😂🤣😂🤣
I’ve never heard someone call it giggle mode that’s funny
Ha Ha Ha, yeah that EXPERT Was A DEM JOKE FOR SURE
Is this the same event that the ATF director showed he did not know the difference in a clip and a magazine?
Yeah it is
The fact that the ATF is so ridiculous that I’m still trying to figure out any of these idiots determined who’s an expert.
The fact that one of their points is “if it has a stock it’s more tactically more dangerous” means we can have it just without the stock
Policy is already set. We have Constitutional policy that should not be infringed.
Yet it is. All the time and they are working tirelessly to do it more.
@@TheSakufighter - That is because we stopped tar and feathering when we needed to.
The head of the ATF has proven he is ignorant about firearms before congress. The problem is it is easier to go after law abiding citizens than to look for criminals.
Thats why they want everybody registered.. Criminals have no money to steal from.
his ignorance was wasted in congress. congress sits around on our dime making ludicrous laws about which they know nothing,nada,zip about. they sit around making laws that say you cannot have a bayonet lug,or a pistol grip.this is a true and alarming fact that our reps are idiots. some one educate me on the dangers of a bayonet lug(w/no mention of the bayonet itself)
if you make "everything" illegal, you create a huge and powerful government agency with almost unlimited power. Power is the key to this, not public safety, not saving lives; power...
@@pinegroveoutdoors1081 Power is not given..Power is taken..always has, and always will be. We only have one choice to make this stop..
itll get (better) and then theyll get right back to it again..
Surprised noone is talking about that woman pointing the golden handgun DIRECTLY at their "expert" while she spoke
*Shows AK pattern rifle*
"You wouldnt use this for hunting"
Meanwhile, that one AK pattern smoothbore "shotgun" that uses rifle rounds meant for hunting: "Am I a joke to you?"
The Vepr Molot KM-209? The .366 one in Russia's market or is there an American variant?
The ignorance of our government is staggering. These people know next to nothing about guns and they make ridiculous arguments.
That is not accidental. It’s another kind of filibuster.
The blind describing an elephant.
In colored detail
Dude, don’t Insult one of the best animals to ever exist by using them as an example in this situation
As someone who moved from Texas to Michigan a few years back, that gun law map is helpful. Gun laws here feel so restrictive in comparison to my home town. Good knowledge to have.
Agree you need to access guns easier. Your love for school shootings need not stop
As an American we shouldn't have to ask anybody about our rights to own a gun
ATF ?? Alcohol , Tobacco , and Firearms.,. All are "LEGAL " so why does this agency exist ????
It's a spinoff of the IRS. Alcohol and tobacco are heavily taxed.
Remove firearms from it and it's arguably a specialized tax enforcement agency. But you'll notice that you never hear ATF arguing about whether grandma's homemade ginger ale is alcoholic enough to need to be taxed or not. When's the last time you heard of them being mentioned in connection with Alcohol or Tobacco?
@@DanielCovington Well that's what it was originally created for. It was created to help with finances specifically the taxes from Alcohol, Tobacco , and firearms. They overreached and now can control firearms.
Good question.
If you are unable to disassemble something so simple, you are NOT QUALIFIED to tell US about firearms
I know, right? You would think it to be a simple matter for the so-called expert, but apparently not. It's as if that ATF imbecile doesn't know that users' manuals and youtube exist, either one of which could show him how to disassemble a Glock! I mean really, imbeciles like that get called experts!?
indeed, i just purchased my first 2 fire arms, b4 i even start shooting them im getting the cleaning kits and getting to know my fire arms first how to take them apart and put them back together, I am not a pro but i know common sense for safety know your fire arms i think would be common sense but that specialist guess is not qualified at all
its the internet, listen to whoever you wanna but ill trust this guy before i trust the ATF 😂
@@foogey.3252 he IS the "A.T.F"
If the government really supported the constitution. And wasn't afraid of the citizens. Every law abiding American citizen would be issued a base issued gun free by the government.
Like that's going to ever happen.
Thank you , Great video !!!
A Person you voted for, and put in office, should NEVER BE ABLE TO TAKE AWAY YOUR VOTE- OR RIGHTS.
Agreed
mostly not them. the atf is a power unto themselves,who tho UNelcted pass regs that have the power of law.how is that ??
These clowns should get an Academy Award for the drama and BS. 🙄
I give you props for watching that show. I got board and confused really fast. I felt like Margret looked.
Bless you my friend.
NO LAW against building your own weapons !
Tools not weapons first but I agree with you.
And if there was would it matter? If so you are the problem
@@elijahwilliams7975 they're literally weapons, that's why we need them lmao
don't know much about weapons I find it odd I can go to a sporting goods shop and buy a crossbow no questions asked but cant buy a gun cause of some stuff in my past that had noting to do with a gun
@@roberthoppock5349 can always buy black powder guns
Just look at the fake concern on that woman's face.
My understanding of SBR/SBS restrictions was that they were in the 1938 NFA because it was originally going to also restrict handguns. SBR/SBS wording was to prevent people from circumvent this by cutting down a long gun. When the handgun provisions were removed, they forgot to remove SBR/SBS sections. Funny thing is Congress later shortened the minimum rifle barrel length to 16" to accommodate the surplus M1As the DOD sold to civilians.
bureaucrats and reporters ... your go-to source of accurate legal advice
To repeat an old quotation: "There is NO SUCH THING as a 'dangerous weapon,' there are only dangerous people."
Oh, I don’t know. Something that blows up in your face because it is poorly maintained is pretty dangerous.
Yes, government employees and politicians. Very dangerous
@@Frankie5Angels150sooo YOU failing maintaining a clean firearm and it exploding in your face is the GUN’s fault. Okay 👌
@@CraftageNate no, its the owners fault. now, a poorly designed firearm that explodes in your face despite being well maintained is not the fault of the owner.
@@dragonmasterlangeweg7625 Though one could argue it's on the owner for not doing their research and utilizing a faulty or visually poor quality/ramshackle product 😅
The part that always gets me is when they bring up the ‘rate of fire’. Unless everybody is using drum clips , these ‘rates of fire’ are unrealistic.
Even with drum magazines, hundreds of rounds a second is unrealistic.
Well they are experts. 😢
This should really be a more viewed video. I’ll be sharing it 👍
well done. thank you
They should have asked Dettelbach something he’s more familiar with, like implementing communism.
“Well, step one is take away their guns!”
The average price of a jelly donut?
The use of personal pronouns or how to identify what someone identify's as. 😂
That's right, people violence not gun violence ...
Awesomely detailed brother 💪
Two thumbs waaaaay up!! You are doing the Lord’s work!!!
Ah yes superbly dangerous, unless you pay the crown $200...
I hardly noticed the M-249 sitting there next to all the scary arm braces and "glock" switches.
Just an example of what the ATF sold to the cartel
It gets tiresome to have to keep filing lawsuits to maintain a Constitutional Right but we can't stop challenging them in court no matter how much it costs or how long it takes.
I don’t trust our government at all these days!
ATF must be shut down !
There needs to be a disbandment of the ATF. Alcohol is legal, tobacco is legal and firearms are legal. So no need for ATF.
@@michaelleclair8278 so why dont millions of us petition our government and have em shut down?
@@batbutonfire sounds like a great idea. I would sign it.
Yes
There is another organization, can't remember the name, that handles drugs. Though I have no idea what they are doing now.
I would bet Detlebach has NEVER even fired a gun of any kind.
The head of the ATF should be fired and sued for millions for gross negligence. He has lied to the American people and has shown to be incompetence for his position. His position is a misuse of taxpayer dollars and should be considered embezzlement.
Ty for doing what you do
I am impressed by the bravery of the news woman to fearlessly be in the same room with so many terrifying deadly objects! I thought for sure that at any moment they would jump up off the table and attack her!!!😳😳😳
point !
Where was the gun violence? We constantly hear about how violent guns are but those were model citizens.
$200 makes it less dangerous 😂
what was "bad" was the complete lack of knowledge about firearms displayed by two of the ATF's senior leadership. CLearly, neither of them knew much about the firearms they were discussing and then passing off this ignorance to the general public.
You guys refused to help Kyle, you are no better and are afraid of all of them
3:11 😂😂😂😂 you know what else is identical? Tyranny and disarming your populace
The ATF expert and his numbnuts boss repeatedly failed to check the weapons were empty and flagged multiple people.
And had their lack of gun safety led to a round being fired, they would have used that moment as proof to how dangerous guns are, not how blatantly ignorant they are.
Thank you
It’s comical that the AFT keeps mentioning the cartel as if they are going to fallow the laws anyway…? They must be totally clueless.
This is a visual of the old saying...."The blind leading the blind"
This video serves as a reminder of the importance of responsible firearm education and advocacy. Keep up the good work in debunking these misconceptions!
As soon as i heard them compare the "same 2" guns, I threw up. Get these clowns out forever. ATF needs to be completely removed at this point and should be banned for having any rights to say what gun we cant own.
3 idiots in a room n you get a bunch of BS!
I went to one of the small ATF seminars that they provide for people in the firearms industry. The FBI, ATF, and a I think a USCCA guy were there. The USCCA guy talked about security on the job and it was good, guy was interesting and engaging. The FBI guy talked about resources for workers to contact and that was good, again, interesting and engaging. The two ATF agents would have been better off not talking in anyway shape or form, every word made me think less and less of them and the ATF, they would say "any questions" and not be able to answer one question, and referring almost all to "another department." The head guy for the region looked like he wanted to put us all in jail and sounded angry for the minute that he talked at the podium and then took no questions himself. The ATF people that were there seemed to me to be incompetent but they could have been being purposefully obtuse, they seemed to have really poor social skills too, like scary kind of poor social skills.
It continues to amaze me that theses guys at the atf think criminals are going to obey the laws
They don't care about criminals, it's the citizens they want to disarm. Criminals are free no matter the crime. Ten million illegals brought in by democrats. Criminals, terrorists and foreign militaries. Democrats want to grant them citizenship so that they can buy guns legally to use against American citizens.
This video never gets old! 🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Love how real this USCCA narrator is. "I even messed up a little there and still got it done faster."
These 'experts' make me feel like an expert
The incompetent agents have trouble with paperweights as well, not at all surprising.
Great Video , I agree with everything you said !!!! 💥🔫🔫🇺🇸
I wouldn't trust them to make toast. Looks like a new episode of the three stooges.
It's not about right or wrong. It's about control!
If you fill the form out online, your data is collected and put in a dayabase registry.
They put people who does not know what they need to know to do their job. Great.
Zero crime using .50 caliber rifles. Bullets cost $5 per each. $12000 per each rifle.
the only crime that could maybe be linked to a .50 caliber rifle is theft, more specifically someone stealing stuff to afford the ammo.
Moe, Larry and Curly have more firearms knowledge than these 3 clowns.
we have OUR RIGHT to own, but still need Permission???..........and from Govm't🤨
It’s stupid how these directors get appointed yet they’ve never served in the military or in any law enforcement. That should be a prerequisite for all of them.
Liberal activists are not gun experts
The worst part is you’d be surprised how people who served will go against their oath.
0:57 The ATF would NEVER do anything for the purpose of making it more convenient for law abiding citizens to own firearms.
I haven't touched a gun in 30+ years and I wouldn't handle those guns like they did - they were like toddlers handling those guns - and their explanations were atrocious
THESE ARE SO-CALLED ATF EXPERTS? Maybe experts in the A & T aspects
I can't imagine admitting to people that I worked for or had worked for the ATF.
Somebody in Congress needs to bring in a real gun expert, like a military instructor. Ideally this person would also own firearms and be a hunter and/or competition shooter. He'll go into Congress with a big case of weapons, and explain the parts, operation, and terminology used for modern firearms. Have it entered into the Congressional Record. Make it so every member of Congress is educated on firearms. No politics, no bias, no push toward legislation. Just a straight-up vocabulary lesson. There's no reason that any lawmaker who's making gun laws doesn't know these terms and true statistics. Show that either a.) your Congressman is misinformed and incorrect, and correct them, or b.) Your Congressman is a straight-up liar. It should be done after each Congressional/Senatorial election. Even anti-gun people wouldn't object to learning facts, right? ... Right?
ALL “ARMS”; I don’t care about the form factor- SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. Get angry America!
So, Howitzers? Mortars? Surface to Air Missiles? Perhaps a Reaper Drone or Two? ALL ARMS?
@@rollofthed4742
If the argument is that the people are not responsible enough to possess these weapons, then the government definitely shouldn't.
A Government is made up of a nations people, if you wanna be the person who pilots the drones, get good. If you don't trust the selection process, don't toss it out entirely. Nobody needs a Rail Gun in their garage.@@DanielCovington
@@rollofthed4742Yes All according to the constitution. To insure the government cannot use tyrannical power against the public. Does that make you feel afraid? 🤔
No but also, I'm an Air Force veteran, who understands the historical context of the Constitution, and I'm not foolish enough to believe that a "well regulated militia" can hold a candle to The United States Armed Forced, nor should they.@@TheTonyEd
Just a safety tip: If you have an SBR and you can see the tip of the bullet, that's too short, you need a slightly longer barrel.
It's about the money, and the power over citizens.
That woman is absolutely insufferable. " You don't need that for hunting 🤓"
Pretty sure she doesn't know the first thing about hunting either.
@@DanielCovington pretty sure she doesn’t know anything at all, except being a far left woke corrupt liberal dim..
@@DanielCovington she's in the media, her job is just to read her lines. Expecting her to know about guns is like expecting Joe Biden to not wander off during a speech.