A Level Physics: Electricity: Mock Exam

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 мар 2018
  • Electricity mock exam review on Ohm's Law, Kirchhoff's Laws, Uncertainty, Potential Dividers, EMF and Internal Resistance.
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 52

  • @user-lf6ds3fb3x
    @user-lf6ds3fb3x 5 месяцев назад +3

    This was genuinely so helpful, thankyou so much because I can never seem to find good exam questions on youtube.

  • @pingu8394
    @pingu8394 2 года назад +5

    Sir I love your videos!!! Thank you so much for the concise and organised explanations/model answers!!!

  • @r3ma1n36
    @r3ma1n36 Год назад +1

    Thank you so much !!

  • @LiviBea
    @LiviBea 2 года назад +2

    rock on dude

  • @jaideeppatil4414
    @jaideeppatil4414 6 месяцев назад

    In the question at 17:42 can not solve it with the E.M.F = V+Ir formula, because when I try to solve it the r comes 0 ohms?

  • @bigg.grizzlybear2670
    @bigg.grizzlybear2670 5 месяцев назад +1

    1:41, Why did you use the parallel formula for the two 30 ohms resistors? Are they in parallel the two 30 ohm resistors?

    • @burrowsphysics
      @burrowsphysics  4 месяца назад

      Yes there are 2 parallel routes taking you from X to Y. One with a resistance of 60 (30+30) and the other with a resistance of 40 (20 + 20), hence the use of the parallel formula

  • @kevinio
    @kevinio Год назад +2

    11:45 in the final step shouldn’t it be 3x 230^2??

    • @burrowsphysics
      @burrowsphysics  Год назад

      Yes I believe you are correct! Thanks for flagging!

  • @medinecharyyeva9313
    @medinecharyyeva9313 4 года назад +3

    in 15:09 what would happen to the reading on the voltmeter if the resistance in the variable resistor was not fixed??

    • @rorymoynihan9517
      @rorymoynihan9517 2 года назад

      It would change, making the resistance fixed allows us to revive a single answer if it wasn’t, we wouldn’t be able to get an answer as there is no value of resistance we can use

  • @shoesharx7810
    @shoesharx7810 2 года назад +2

    Hi. Whilst you've stated in the comments that these are AQA past questions I do not recall ever seeing questions involving mean drift velocity (as seen in Q12). Can you clarify this please?
    Many thanks

    • @burrowsphysics
      @burrowsphysics  2 года назад

      If you see the publish date, it was from 2018. Highly possible that AQA have now removed this from their specification. I haven't taught AQA for a few years so I wouldn't know if they have or not! It is a useful concept to know about even if it isn't in the specification though

  • @qaliila
    @qaliila Год назад +1

    for qn 3 i calculated 1/120+1/500 and i didnt got 96.77 i got a different answer, i got 31/300 which is 0.0103 in decimals. what do i do wrong how did you got 96.77 ohms.

    • @burrowsphysics
      @burrowsphysics  Год назад

      Did you remember to take the reciprocal once you'd added them together? Remember 1/R total = 1 / R1 + 1 / R2... + ....

  • @takdirsaiful628
    @takdirsaiful628 4 месяца назад +1

    Hi is dis for ocr a?

    • @burrowsphysics
      @burrowsphysics  4 месяца назад +1

      pretty sure this is for AQA A but the electricity questions are pretty much the same in both

  • @gamingwithhbgalaxylife4224
    @gamingwithhbgalaxylife4224 4 года назад +5

    On question 11 shouldn’t it be R= 3*230squared/10500 ?

    • @lewiswinkless
      @lewiswinkless 4 года назад

      Yes it should be but his answer is still right so he just put in the wrong number

    • @someone3706
      @someone3706 4 года назад

      Yes, you are right

  • @primsiren1360
    @primsiren1360 3 года назад +1

    For 6 wouldn't it be A because the three resistors gives the highest resistance, and the question is asking which one dissipates (i.e wastes) the most?

    • @burrowsphysics
      @burrowsphysics  3 года назад +4

      High resistance doesn't mean you waste the most energy. You have to calculate the power dissipated by a resistor to do that which is proportional to current squared

  • @megata6184
    @megata6184 2 года назад

    Why do you not add the percentage uncertainties together for question 3, that's what we've been told when multiplying and divide numbers,

    • @burrowsphysics
      @burrowsphysics  2 года назад +1

      But they aren't being multiplied or divided here. When we have resistors in parallel we add their reciprocals and then reciprocal the answer.
      The approach here used the fact that percentage uncertainty means that the value could be 10% higher or 10% lower. I simply figured out how much bigger than the calculated value the total resistance COULD be and found it to be about 9% different

    • @megata6184
      @megata6184 2 года назад

      @@burrowsphysics thank you very much

    • @megata6184
      @megata6184 2 года назад

      @@burrowsphysics I had the idea that since we’re having to take the reciprocal we’re basically dividing but that’s not really the case

  • @umaniperera9408
    @umaniperera9408 5 лет назад +2

    COULD U HELP ME WITH THIS QUESTION PLEASE
    a cabel consists of 10 strands of copper wire each of cross-section area 1.1x10^-3 cm^2. Calculate (a) the resistance per meter of the cable (b) the minimum number of strands which would be required if the resistance per meter is not to exceed 0.010ohms. (resistivity of copper = 1.8 x 10^-8 ohm meter.)

    • @ohheho3895
      @ohheho3895 4 года назад +1

      @Yung PouriiP rude

  • @gamingwithhbgalaxylife4224
    @gamingwithhbgalaxylife4224 4 года назад +3

    I don’t understand how you got 0.8 for the percentage question 9 .

    • @lewiswinkless
      @lewiswinkless 4 года назад +4

      0.4%+0.4% because you are doing 0.5mx0.5m

  • @Nahum242
    @Nahum242 2 года назад +1

    isnt the anwser to question 8 D and not B

    • @burrowsphysics
      @burrowsphysics  2 года назад

      No you need the thermistor to have very high resistance and the LDR to have low resistance to maximise the voltmeter reading which is why D is wrong

  • @nawfaljafri
    @nawfaljafri 2 года назад +2

    good questions but you it woulve been better if you explained some of the concepts along the way too

    • @burrowsphysics
      @burrowsphysics  2 года назад +2

      Potentially but typically an exam comes after having explained concepts in class and I felt going into more detail would have simply made the video too long!

  • @syds9558
    @syds9558 4 года назад +2

    im lost on question 8 tbh

  • @AC-pz3lz
    @AC-pz3lz 2 года назад +1

    Can someone explain the equation used in question 8?

    • @burrowsphysics
      @burrowsphysics  2 года назад

      That's just the potential divider equation that you can use to calculate the potential difference across one of the resistors in series

  • @bobbyclarke591
    @bobbyclarke591 4 года назад

    7:50

  • @jacobonline6994
    @jacobonline6994 4 года назад +4

    question 11 is wrong, you're meant to do 3*230^2/10500 not 2*230^2/10500

    • @lewiswinkless
      @lewiswinkless 4 года назад +5

      His answer is right he just put a 2 instead of a 3

  • @qaliila
    @qaliila Год назад +1

    why did you multiplied 1/120 and 1/500 with 1.1. And what does 1/R max means

    • @burrowsphysics
      @burrowsphysics  Год назад

      Multiplying by 1.1 calculates the resistance if each of the resistors were 10% larger than the stated value. Using those 10% higher values calculate the largest possible combined resistance hence why Rmax is used

  • @medinecharyyeva9313
    @medinecharyyeva9313 4 года назад

    in Question 1 you don't have to find the total power in parallel like we do with resistance 1/R + 1/R ???????

  • @musfiqurrahman3964
    @musfiqurrahman3964 3 года назад +10

    You're making the calculations very complicated and this is gonna confuse the students. I don't recommend this video

    • @macvnc9060
      @macvnc9060 3 года назад

      Which video do you reccomend?

    • @user-hq6sp
      @user-hq6sp 3 года назад +9

      As a student, I think the calculations are quite clear to understand and found this video very useful. I will be recommending my friends to watch it

  • @HomelessCoaching
    @HomelessCoaching 2 года назад

    Can someone explain question 2 please?

    • @burrowsphysics
      @burrowsphysics  2 года назад +3

      Essentially you have 2 parallel branches connecting X to Y. (One branch with a total resistance of 30 + 30 = 60 and the other branch with a total resistance of 20 + 20 = 40)
      Since those two branches are in parallel, we calculate their total resistance using: 1/R = 1/40 + 1/60

    • @Johnny-ts5hh
      @Johnny-ts5hh 2 года назад

      Because you can't add 2 fractions with a different denominator, we have to find the lowest common in so we x one by 2 and the other by 3

  • @aron4317
    @aron4317 3 года назад +1

    I hate uncertainty question 😕

    • @burrowsphysics
      @burrowsphysics  3 года назад +4

      I don't think it is anyone's favourite part of being a scientist but it is an important part of all experimental work!