And likely plenty of technology to colonize other star systems, either via sleeper ships or by that time already developing *some kind* of FTL travel. Which is not only better opportunity, it's also far more secure as it ensures humanity's survival should anything happen to Solar system at large.
@playgrrrr Well... it's because some people think that we will have to go to other planets like Mars because we're ruining our own and stuff, and this speech discusses that... and also because it's awesome.
@@mihan2d FTL travel is by today's knowledge impossible for you will reach a point where you wont go faster no matter how much energy you use long before reaching lightspeed
If your interested try to play terragenisis its a really cool game you start on mars and you have to terraform it if your done you get other planets if you like terraforming try it
Same here, something that I've thought about on a few occasions. Honestly, that magnetosphere part is probably the biggest challenge, as it seems virtually impossible to re-liquefy the core of that planet and nearly impossible to add enough magnetism in orbit at L1 to actually shield the planet from solar winds. I haven't done the calculations, but I suspect you'd need an iron sphere the size of Earth's moon to provide that level of magnetism, or at least somewhere between terawatts to petawatts of power to generate that level of electromagnetism. We'll likely not live long enough to see any advancements in this area, but it's fun to dream :)
Aeturnalis hope fully we can find stuff when humans land on mars, maybe some compounds hidden in the soils. Possibly even some stuff that could let us see mars isn’t dead, maybe if we were to pump heat into the core an old vulcano gets reawakened, It is possible. That a planet is looking dead but is active on the inside. But what if the crust was massively compacted and it the core just got too weak to make vulcanos active? Then maybe some power from the outside could help. By weakening the crust by drilling holes in it, and injecting a massive amount of explosives in the holes and then inject all the heat
@@Aeturnalis I think building a giant iron sphere isn't the most efficient way to accomplish this. In principle, all we need is a bar magnet. I ruled out electromagnets because they seem to need way too much power, or not, depending on your calculations. But yeah. A permanent magnet would only need to be magnetized periodically, instead of constantly like an electromagnet. However, I don't think I can design a magnet like that. It'd have to be extremely strong and powerful.
@@ДаниилРабинович-б9п First? That was never claimed. They'll inevitably be there though, and when they set up their colony I hope to see them drop the rancid two-party system in turn. What are you implying?
@@aespa690 I’m pretty sure he has at least a bachelors in environmental science, so objectively he is a scientist, but to say “high caliber” is subjective. There’s scientists designing and using particle accelerators and sh!t like that lol high caliber is probably better used when referring to them
The problem with this picture is that its not exactly clear just how much of that ancient water is left after billions of years of atmosphere depletion cased by the weak magnetosphere. It could be that the majority of it has already been blasted off by solar wind. Current pressure is 1/100 that of earth. Mars has effectively lost its entire atmospheric mass of gasses many times over (since it was being replenished by regenerative outgassing from rocks and ice, which was all also lost). That includes water and its components. There's still some remaining ice there, but even in the best case scenario restoring anything resembling these images of deep planet spanning oceans on Mars may not be possible anymore without adding new water.
I was thinking the same thing. Like we aren't even close to truly knowing what we have to work with there. A reason why I stopped watching discovery science and others was because of the a matter of fact way they said everything. I enjoyed watching amateur videos created by scientists or even high quality production videos from organizations like NASA on youtube more. Now RUclips is being inundated with main stream wanna be people with their a matter of fact dialog. I understand it sells but a little more humility would be great.
even if Mar have little Ancient Water left we can fixed that by importing the water from elsewhere and we got plenty of water in our Solar System, the Kuiper Belt asteroids, most of them made of ice, water ice, so just bring them to mars and bombarded them unto the planets, that's how Earth got her water
@@DarthMalgusSith_Lord Okay but with all that energy you'd spend moving asteroids you might as well just live in space colonies. Terraforming doesn't make any economic sense.
@Up-a-Creek that's a good question, human nature are unpredictable, sometime we're rational and mostly we become too greedy for certain thing. i already lost hope in humanity, so i don't mind if they drive themselves into extinction
oil is not evil. It's irresponsible use is. Without oil, musk wouldn't stand a chance. But he never mentions that. i forgot the exact numbers, but to keep a tiny colony alive on mars will require 1000 re-supply missions every two years. So we rape the earth so we can keep a handful of people alive on a dead planet! 1000 spaceships every two years requires lots of OIL! But musk won't tell you that! Instead, packs of braindead morons try to convince the rest of us that musk is a genius. i don't see it. Every time i watch musk talk i question whether he got past 3rd grade. The guy who narrates this video watched too much total recall. Just like musk.
@@michael-dm2bv He doesn't have to tell anyone oil is currently necessary. Anyone in the field and most people out of it can see it for themselves. And _virtually _*_everyone_* who's *anyone* in the big leagues of science knows Elon's intellect isn't rare in virtually every respect. He's just the man behind the project who's vaguely in charge of it. The point is to change how much oil we need to use to do things, and eventually bring it to zero.
As someone who loves to play Terraforming Mars on a relatively frequent basis, this is some much appreciated context to everything you can do in that game
pasoundman Err well it’s one of the most highly rated board games on boardgamegeek nowadays. Can’t tell you which of your personal local stores will sell it but I’m sure you can google it
@@Kuddochan if you want a game that involves terraforming a REALLY good one Terragenesis it even has different fractions with their own goals to achieve and you can colonize a whole bunch of different planets including random and custom ones if you pay a but extra (the base game is free though a lot of the game can be unlocked by beating different planets). You can even create your own biosphere with plants and animals you need to balance and maintain.
@@Kuddochan It’s still pretty high. Nominated for the Spiel de Jahares last year, in fact! It didn’t win but… my shop has dedicated an entire shelf to it and all its expansions (and the Dune games). And we sell it quite regularly. It’s no Gloomhaven, but it’s doing quite well!
So it seems to me like the one big hurdle to overcome here is the construction and maintenance of dynamos to shield mars, everything else seemed to be a more or less natural process that we could potentially speed up as well. Maybe bezos and musk could work together to get this done.
One catch is, notice how he mentioned that about half the atmosphere/carbon dioxide is locked up as dry ice? Mars has an incredibly thin atmosphere, so even if you released all the carbon dioxide on the planet you might still not have an atmosphere thick enough for humans. It's certainly a start, but we may want to supplement it. That being said, I hear we humans are pretty good at pumping carbon dioxide into the air...
@@benwest5293 Ive seen other videos, PBS Spacetime did one talking about this, where they crunched some numbers and decided that it likely wouldn't be possible to get the atmosphere thick enough. I think it was PBS Spacetime.
@@benwest5293 Its not good enough for humans probably, but it sure enough might be good enough for the plants or smaller animals which can be used to kickstart the ecosystem on Mars.
I'm sorry because this is an awesome video but this time you made some wild hypothesis here. The Mars Express image of Hebes Chasma is made in "false colors". This is not what it looks like in real life but a combination of filters of the High Resolution Stereo Camera (HRSC) with an arbitrary color paletta that would make features of interest have a higher contrast. Thus, the green region is nothing related to life (in principle) and the blue regions are not water itself (misteriously captured just once). Nonetheless the OMEGA instrument onboard of Mars Express revealed gypsum to be present in the surface of Hebes Chasma; gypsum is a water-bearing mineral so it is easy to assume that Hebes Chasma once had water. But again you are not seeing wet lake beds here and the blue color is not what you would percieve as blue in real life. If you want to take a closer view of those apparent "water flows" you should look at HiRise images from the MRO mission on the Hebes Chasma Region: www.uahirise.org/hiwish/view/9511 For example you can see here (hirise-pds.lpl.arizona.edu/PDS/EXTRAS/RDR/ESP/ORB_045700_045799/ESP_045736_1790/ESP_045736_1790_RED.abrowse.jpg), with a resolution of 27 cm/pixel, that the feature you point out in 11:01 is considered to be just a "dark landslide on northeast flank of Hebes Mensa", dark sand (proably not making dunes there and being smooth because of the slope). Source 1: www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Mars_Express/Hebes_Chasma_a_trough_in_the_Grand_Canyon_of_Mars Source 2: sci-hub.tw/10.1029/2018JE005658 Source 3: www.uahirise.org/ESP_045736_1790
Finally someone talks about the most interesting part of the entire video I was looking everywhere trying to find something about the lakes because like you think surface water on another planet would get a couple of news sites excited And have at least a few youtube videos made about it But I couldn't really find anything i guess this explains it. I gotta say tho it really does look like water flows And it's like at the hottest part of the planet in a deep pit where the atmosphere would be thicker But I guess I got excited for no reason got damn...
I'm really enjoying this Mars series. Any chance at a Venus one after? I feel Mars is really recognizable, but Venus is hidden under thick clouds so I don't know much about it's geography.
It doesn't have much geography. The planet is so volcanically and tectonically active that any given point on the surface is short lived and doomed to be covered by lava flows or landslides
@@bluebonic3497 A quick google says that's false. Venus doesn't have tectonic plate. And while Earth's average surface age is 100 million years, Venus's is estimated at 300-600 million.
Best way to make mars habitable? Scraping off the top layer of crust, and turning it into a space habitat. Then scraping off the new top layer and doing the same. And again. And again. And again. By the end of it, you'll have several million earths worth of living area, all perfectly tailored to human specification. Even to the ends of being giant multi-earth-sized zoos and ecosystems.
Mars has really good potential. It’s also really good because Mars is mostly co2 so if we just thicken the atmosphere we can keep mars warm. However the only challenge with mars is core is cold so it dosent have a magnetic-sphere but hopefully we can find ways. :)
He addresses this pretty early on in the video. We can place a dynamo at the L1 Lagrange point between Mars and the Sun and produce an artificial magnetic field there to shield Mars. You don't necessarily need to restart Mars' own magnetic field
The problem with Venus is, it's closer to the sun. Terraforming a planet is a multi generational project (ie 100s of years if not 1000) and with each passing century sun is getting hotter so Venus will "soon" (in astronomical terms) fall off the inner edge of sun's habitable zone
Will there be countries on mars or the whole planet will be united and will only have a single ruling government for the whole planet. If world government will exist, what will be it's consequences and will it be for the greater good of humanity as a species.
Whili I enjoy the theoretical excercise, it always surprises me how some people really think living on Mars will be a thing in the future. Just imagine how much more costly it would be to change the martian athmosphere compared to prevent the earth climate from changing so much that Mars becomes a better place to live in.
Honestly we should try the upper sky of venus. High gravity, similar air pressure and temperature to earth, less radiation than Mars and dense lower clouds make floating airships possible.
Even if we somehow solved the massive problems like Mars dead core for example, gravity is an issue that we won't be able to solve, Mars just has way to low of gravity for any sort of long term settlement
This video has a number of issues stemming from the assumption that enough ice and frozen gas remains on Mars to make terraforming possible. The issues are gone into in great depth in this video describing an actual in depth terraforming procedure: ruclips.net/video/RcXBuYwm3xk/видео.html Essentially though you can't terraform Mars without importing massive amounts of water as well as nitrogen and oxygen (potentially as co2 from Venus) from elsewhere. This is because most of the water and co2 that Mars used to have has been lost to the solar wind over time. Ultimately not enough co2 actually remains to create an atmosphere that would make liquid water possible. Mars also has weaker gravity than Earth, which means it actually needs a much thicker atmosphere to produce the same Earth-like atmospheric pressure.
Please just stop. Mars has permafrost all over. Research evidence by landers, rovers and martian meteorites. Some people really want to make things as difficult as they can, don't they, like Isaac Arthur you linked to - who makes SCI-FI fantasy videos not factual, realistic videos. I'm baffled you can't tell the difference.
@@strategicthinker8899 Firstly you don't address the lack of enough frozen gasses which is the bigger problem here. Secondly just because there's plenty of permafrost doesn't mean there's *enough* to support a whole hydrosphere with large above ground bodies of water. Maybe you should watch the video I linked because it actually runs the numbers rather than just going off of intuition.
For liquid water to exist 12 millibars of pressure is needed. Mars atmosphere is currently 6 millibars but in some really deep caverns on mars pressure reaches 12 millibars which indicates that even on present day mars liquid water on the Martian surface is possible. So creating enough atmosphere for liquid water on the surface of mars is possible considering the amount of dry ice at the Martian south pole
@@ryanhassett3733 even if we solve the water problem there's also the lack of a magnetic field and a dead core, which doesn't even seem possible to fix, and the even bigger problem we won't be able to fix (except through maybe genetic engineering) gravity, Mars gravity is way to low to have any long term settlements
I'm a researcher and my specialty is Mars. For the most part this is very good and accurate. I especially enjoyed the references to little-known features like Echus, Juventae, Welles, and Hebes. However, do a little research and you'll find photos from the ESA Mars Express orbiter of unimstakeable liquid lakes extant on Mars today; belying the party line that Mars is cold, dry and dead. (By the way, they have much better resolution and color than we ever get from NASA/JPL/MSSS). Also, I'm hoping for it to come in my lifetime, but I have yet to see any video about Mars that doesn't call it "The Red Planet". This is because of the over-hyped idea that the regolith is almost entirely iron oxide, which is ridiculous. OVERALL, the color is more like the Arizona desert. Thanks!
Study more, so far I see no mention of the need for nitrogen to create a stable atmosphere. Everywhere I see this sci-fi nonsense about 'terraforming' mentioned there is crickets about the vast amounts nitrogen needed.
@@frankderks1150 i gave you a thumbs up. there is nitrogen. 2.7% and the Argon is a noble gas at 1.6% but you make a good point about Nitrogen. I'm interested in seeing what they come up with.
I hate to burst everyone's bubble, but thats not water. The image in use is a false color image taken by the mars orbiter. Its mean to express the different rock layers visible to the camera. The real color you'd see in person is what google maps is showing. Sadly thats not liquid water pooling in Hebes Chasma.
The magnetosphere problem is a myth, at least on human timescales, we do not need to give mars a manetosphere as long as we dont live for hundreds of millions of years.
It can still be a problem because there can still be radiation and the atmosphere could be stripped much faster than that. We should do the L1 magnetic field thing or place ultra powerful magnets at the poles
@@therealspeedwagon1451 How exactly do you belive it could be gone in a short amount of time, when we know for a fact that it took hundres of millions of years with similar conditions to deplete it in the first place, this makes no sense only a very close/powerful gamma-ray burst or close super nova could do that. The reason for a magnetosphere sattelite would be to provide some shielding while we create the atmosphere, not to prevent its errosion.
Incredible view, graphic, animation etc. Excellent video trying to explain in so much of detail. Didn't even know all this names and places on Mars. Well made very informative video. Thanks a lot 👍🤘👌
That's pretty optimistic considering most professionals that study Mars say terraforming Mars is pure science fiction, some things just aren't possible. In all honesty Venus' atmosphere would be the best bet for colonization because you don't have to worry about one of the biggest problems with the idea of Mars colonization, the gravity being so low. Humans are evolved for the incredibly specific conditions on Earth, and even then we can only go about 5 miles up and about 7 down before we would die from lack of oxygen, high pressure or heat.
I think we are going to become cyborgs and will be able to live in space, inside artificial space stations, long before terraforming a whole planet to another earth.
Yeah turning a whole planet seems a bit far fetched tbh. Can someone remind me; why do we have to leave in the first place? Maybe just... idk, not start a nuclear war and destroy the planet? It’s going to get warmer on Earth wheather humans are here to accelerate it or not.
@@Momo-idky Very interesting, thanks. So it was likely not flowing water but glaciers that created these erosion marks, though the general shape that water would take if Mars were heated up remains the same.
*Trump 2224* Make Mars great again! _Forget red counties & red states. I'm running from the Red planet!_ - God Emperor Trump, floating down the corridor of Trump™ Space Station at Lagrange point 3.
in view of the fact that any method of terraforming is unknown to humanity, you can decide for yourself how long it might take but if terraforming were possible then it would likely take a very very long while.
Dark features in Hebes Casma are sand dunes. In infrared images volcanic rock/sand looks dark with bluish tint caused by heavy minerals rich in iron. What you see as pools of water, planetary geologists see as dunes made from heavy minerals sand. You can even see the 'flat lakebed' is actually convex - typical for large dunes. Sorry, but you are dead wrong in that regard.
Yeah we can't keep our Earth safe and know only 3% of our Earth. We dug only 0,002% of the way till earth's center and we can suddenly 'terraform' another planet and see clues from heckling sattelite image. I'm not a hater but this all looks like fairy tales
What you are describing here takes centuries of effort and an immense amount of money to fund it... with a fraction of that budget you could make life on Earth way better for all...
If we could put some giant lightning rods that goes into the planets core and then create a molten center again. It should work to make a magnetosphere, and all the drilling that need to be done would generate pollution that would trap the suns heat. Thereby heating it both from within and from the outside.
If we did make an artificial magnetism it would make an atmosphere, therefore making the planet able to trap the suns heat,that would instantly trigger a chain reaction event with the core of the planet starting to melt and ice becoming water on the surface etc.
How about not storing our eggs in one basket, that’s the real problem, why not have a backup when things get out of hand, whether that’s climate change or a virus or nuclear war, anything
@@aespa690 it is not. Climate change is real and it’s going at a much faster pass than it normally does. We should be worried and we should stop it but that doesn’t mean we can do other things while we stop it
It's sad Mars lost most of its water when its magnetic field "Disapeared". Sadly even if we could create a new magnetosphere, the geological activity that Mars still presents is unlikely to create an atmosphere with the rigth pressure to allow liquid water to flow. We could however direct icy meteorites to the planet therefor warming it and releacing both water and some gases
I realy dont get all of that Mars hype. Even if we use all these resources and more to terra form completely, mars will still not be an an atonamasly functioning Planet. Because of gravaty. The only way to change the gravaty on mars is 1. Add more mass or 2. Live in in rotating weel like citys. What is frankly speaking crazy. You can live on mars under the earth like a caveman and mine minarels and that's fine it will be profitable but only outposts are possible as a person cannot live their intire live with dutch low gravity and nobody wants it. As that brings health problems with it like heartfailior, blindness, savere osteoporosis ect. You also shouldn't get pregnant as that could kill the mother and the kid. We should not spend resources on something that is not possible anyway. If we terra form anything in the solar system then that should be venus as that is the only planet that is as big our planet and thus would have the same Gravaty if terra formed.
I pray all scientist to make first earth habitable and explore all fish in ocean amd search for fresh water on earth i think their are most mystery on earth which has to be solved.
Considering that we really only have about 2 to 3 centuries left at best before we render our planet uninhabitable to humanity, it's quite obvious that a transition to Mars is necessary in order to preserve our species. The biggest challenges will likely not be solvable in that time frame - magnetosphere, breathable air, and perchlorate concentrations, which wasn't addressed. Honestly, it's in our best interest to start our feeble attempts at stabilizing Mars now while simultaneously working to preserve habitability on the planet that we evolved on. ...and triggered bootlicker conservatives will appear in ...3 ...2 ...1 lol
@@strategicthinker8899 He asks while Oregon and California are engulfed in fires so extensive that the sky in big cities glows orange with the flames and light levels are dimmed by the smoke. Have you not seen it on the telly ? Australia's turn later in the year. 500,000 ordered to evacuate in Oregon amid extensive property loss.
@@petarkukuljica4372 It's also been much colder in the past too ! Your point ? Life on earth will *ADAPT* as it always has. The best adaptation might be a radical reduction in population actually.
Strategic Thinker, no actually, I’d rather have people come up with something unique and creative for once. Not everything has to be linked to another country you came from.
@Huh ? We shouldn’t Terraform Planets as any life that was adapted to the Environment of the Planet beforehand would be killed because they couldn’t survive in conditions that we could. We could’ve studied the life on that Planet and stuff but then we will it off. We also shouldn’t Terraform Planets because many places on those planets might be flooded and many cool sights that maybe people would wanna see would be flooded and to never be seen again. Also by the time we would have Terraformed a planet, That Planet mostly likely have hundreds of Millions of People Living on it. We could easily live in Contained Habitations and not Terraform the Planet. Terraforming would be useless. The Last Reason I think we shouldn’t Terraform Planets is because low Elevation cities could be flooded. We would have to evacuate possibly millions of people to do that! Ya these are my reasons we shouldn’t Terraform Planets.
Yes very nice, one more attempt to explain how we could Terraform mars, without taking Gravaty into account. We can't live with sutch low Gravaty as it is present on mars. Or rather survive. If we Terraform anything than that should be Venus as that planet has nearly the same mass as earth and could in a Terraformed stade provide the same levels of Gravaty as earth does.
Thank you for an excellent video, the idea of a lake in Hebes Chasms is tantalising. However, I am struggling to find much information supporting this interpretation of the ESA satellite imagery in the scientific literature. Is there an alternative explanation for the blue areas in the satellite imagery? I find it hard to believe liquid water in the form of a lake on mars could have been overlooked when so much fuss was made about the recurring slope lineae.
So for the Hebes Chasma part especially I thought it should be pointed out that the image you were looking at is not true color, its enhanced to be visually nice for us. The greens and blues arent really green and blue, you can tell especially that it's not true color by looking at the edges around the canyon to the surface of Mars and how bright it is that show just how enhanced and tuned some of the images are. What we actually see with our eyes is rather dismal and plain, most images are enhanced to liven it up for us.
I should also say, theres lots of conspiracy theorists out there who dont understand what that means. So I should try and be clear, the image where you're pointing out blues and greens from the ESA's Mars Express is not true color, you had lots of good images of true color showing just how dull it was. The blues and greens show where it is deeper.
if you think there's even a 1% chance of us terraforming mars in the next 50 you're stuck inside head. real life isn't starwars people! we cant even terraform our own planet less alone another planet.
"An entire culture dedicated to a common goal, working together as one to turn a lifeless rock into a garden"
“When you spend your whole life living under a dome, even the idea of an ocean seems impossible to imagine.”
We had a garden and we paved it.
"The Agricultural Sector of the World"
@@Migmaqiw ohhh yes, my favourite quote from the expanse...
@James Clark i wasn't even talking about flat earth, tf you mean?
Step 1, don't send genetically modified mutant cockroaches to mars
Nah fuck you i'll do exactly just that
man of culture :3
Or Mosquitos!
TerraforMars
You can send insects bois to stop the cockroaches chad
Atlas Pro decided that covering Earth was too easy and went off to conquer Mars instead
“If we have the technology to terraform Mars, we have more than enough capacity to make our planet better for us to live again” - Neil deGrasse Tyson
And likely plenty of technology to colonize other star systems, either via sleeper ships or by that time already developing *some kind* of FTL travel. Which is not only better opportunity, it's also far more secure as it ensures humanity's survival should anything happen to Solar system at large.
@CG Breeki What's your point exactly?
@playgrrrr Well... it's because some people think that we will have to go to other planets like Mars because we're ruining our own and stuff, and this speech discusses that... and also because it's awesome.
@@mihan2d FTL travel is by today's knowledge impossible for you will reach a point where you wont go faster no matter how much energy you use long before reaching lightspeed
@Jonathan Stiles why would Earth not be well adapted to us?
I hope they get to terraforming Mars soon. I got five kids to feed!
what are you gonna feed em , martian dust ???
@@norbert-yy4be I heard mars soil is a chad drug
Do you want them to feed your 5 children??
@@norbert-yy4be clearly you've never watched Total Recall.
@@overthecounterbeanie no I havent
They should try this on the third planet from the sun.
Omg! Yes perfect candidate!
@@joshuakyle9494 I’m not quite sure you understood the joke, this is not serious, it’s sarcasm.
Tussal Squid idk I mean... I wouldn’t care if humans went extinct. Earth would be much better
@@LynTheAce Not really, so many things depend on humans, too many people think the Earth would be better while it really wouldn’t.
@@joshuakyle9494 That’s my point.
This is some good stuff to watch. Can’t wait.
Terraforming is really something I’m interested in
If your interested try to play terragenisis its a really cool game you start on mars and you have to terraform it if your done you get other planets if you like terraforming try it
Check my Channel.
I once made like 3 super short vids on TerraGenesis
Same here, something that I've thought about on a few occasions. Honestly, that magnetosphere part is probably the biggest challenge, as it seems virtually impossible to re-liquefy the core of that planet and nearly impossible to add enough magnetism in orbit at L1 to actually shield the planet from solar winds. I haven't done the calculations, but I suspect you'd need an iron sphere the size of Earth's moon to provide that level of magnetism, or at least somewhere between terawatts to petawatts of power to generate that level of electromagnetism. We'll likely not live long enough to see any advancements in this area, but it's fun to dream :)
Aeturnalis hope fully we can find stuff when humans land on mars, maybe some compounds hidden in the soils.
Possibly even some stuff that could let us see mars isn’t dead, maybe if we were to pump heat into the core an old vulcano gets reawakened,
It is possible. That a planet is looking dead but is active on the inside. But what if the crust was massively compacted and it the core just got too weak to make vulcanos active? Then maybe some power from the outside could help. By weakening the crust by drilling holes in it, and injecting a massive amount of explosives in the holes and then inject all the heat
@@Aeturnalis I think building a giant iron sphere isn't the most efficient way to accomplish this. In principle, all we need is a bar magnet. I ruled out electromagnets because they seem to need way too much power, or not, depending on your calculations. But yeah. A permanent magnet would only need to be magnetized periodically, instead of constantly like an electromagnet. However, I don't think I can design a magnet like that. It'd have to be extremely strong and powerful.
MMHA: Make Mars Habitable Again
Make Mars great again
MaMaHA
Make Ares Great Again!
~ There I fixed the title. 😅
lmao
For real though, please nobody bring that republican vs democrat crap to Mars. Leave it on Earth, find a better way.
@@ДаниилРабинович-б9п First? That was never claimed. They'll inevitably be there though, and when they set up their colony I hope to see them drop the rancid two-party system in turn. What are you implying?
I realised Atlas Pro is actually a high calibre scientist, rather than just a RUclipsr.
no hes not
He is not but very passionate RUclipsr
@@aespa690 I’m pretty sure he has at least a bachelors in environmental science, so objectively he is a scientist, but to say “high caliber” is subjective. There’s scientists designing and using particle accelerators and sh!t like that lol high caliber is probably better used when referring to them
I love how they named a valley after HG Wells
bruh
ORSON Wells!
Up-a-Creek or a David Bowie
Charon, pluto's moon, has a region called Mordor
He said Orson but yeah
I didn't even know so many areas of Mars have their own names
Watch the video he did on Mars's geography, it has a lot more names.
Mars is well studied so...
Venus also has many named sites, well pretty much every solid body in our solar system has named places expect the smallest of moons.
Rumor is M&M's plans to construct a candy factory on mars. They'll call the site M&M on M. Catchy huh?
@@pbxn-3rdx-85percent really? I thought Mars bar was already their export
The problem with this picture is that its not exactly clear just how much of that ancient water is left after billions of years of atmosphere depletion cased by the weak magnetosphere.
It could be that the majority of it has already been blasted off by solar wind. Current pressure is 1/100 that of earth. Mars has effectively lost its entire atmospheric mass of gasses many times over (since it was being replenished by regenerative outgassing from rocks and ice, which was all also lost). That includes water and its components.
There's still some remaining ice there, but even in the best case scenario restoring anything resembling these images of deep planet spanning oceans on Mars may not be possible anymore without adding new water.
I was thinking the same thing. Like we aren't even close to truly knowing what we have to work with there.
A reason why I stopped watching discovery science and others was because of the a matter of fact way they said everything. I enjoyed watching amateur videos created by scientists or even high quality production videos from organizations like NASA on youtube more. Now RUclips is being inundated with main stream wanna be people with their a matter of fact dialog. I understand it sells but a little more humility would be great.
even if Mar have little Ancient Water left we can fixed that by importing the water from elsewhere and we got plenty of water in our Solar System, the Kuiper Belt asteroids, most of them made of ice, water ice, so just bring them to mars and bombarded them unto the planets, that's how Earth got her water
@@DarthMalgusSith_Lord Okay but with all that energy you'd spend moving asteroids you might as well just live in space colonies. Terraforming doesn't make any economic sense.
@@ObjectsInMotion well yeah, we need a stable home, a planet to lived on, to established a civilisation and to ensured our species survival
@Up-a-Creek that's a good question, human nature are unpredictable, sometime we're rational and mostly we become too greedy for certain thing. i already lost hope in humanity, so i don't mind if they drive themselves into extinction
7:40 we should call it "the grandest canyon" cause screw arizona
The even better canyon
The even better canyon
The even better canyon
No just take the title Grand Canyon and replace Arizona’s with “also a canyon”
Imagine
Somewhere in the far far future
"Terraforming Earth"
Terra means Earth / land mass. Terraforming means making Earthlike. You can't make Earth, Earth, when it's already Earth.
@@janchovanec8624 okay my bad
But I'm talking about making it liveable
@@janchovanec8624 You really did not get it, right? He means one day we will have destroyed earth so much we will need to terraform it.
I mean terraforming techs will probably first be tried in earth's deserts before sending them to other planets
@@vomm or an alien lifeform looking at our wasteland of a planet and wondering if we could be terraformed/livable
First step: Go to mars
Alternative: Don't ruin Earth
Yep , I hate to say it but if c19 knocked off 93 % of the planets population it would be perfect.
Ash j ebola* . also: HOW DARE YOU? 😉 /sarcasm /joke /I like your thinking
@@dajjukunrama5695 what did the internet do to you that you have to make people understand that its sarcasm
@@ashj_2088 C19 what is that ?
@@raifikarj6698 covid19
00:00 - Intro
01:34 - I. Magnetosphere
02:40 - II. Atmosphere
04:13 - III. Hydrosphere
NASA: "We declare that Mars has no oil"
America: *has left the chat*
Would mars have oil? Wouldn't that be a pretty good indicator of life in the past since oil is compressed organic matter?
@@Alice-si8uz yes because some scientists theorize that Mars once had life, so maybe the died organic matter would have compressed to form oil
oil is not evil. It's irresponsible use is. Without oil, musk wouldn't stand a chance. But he never mentions that.
i forgot the exact numbers, but to keep a tiny colony alive on mars will require 1000 re-supply missions every two years.
So we rape the earth so we can keep a handful of people alive on a dead planet!
1000 spaceships every two years requires lots of OIL!
But musk won't tell you that! Instead, packs of braindead morons try to convince the rest of us that musk is a genius.
i don't see it. Every time i watch musk talk i question whether he got past 3rd grade.
The guy who narrates this video watched too much total recall. Just like musk.
@@michael-dm2bv
He doesn't have to tell anyone oil is currently necessary. Anyone in the field and most people out of it can see it for themselves. And _virtually _*_everyone_* who's *anyone* in the big leagues of science knows Elon's intellect isn't rare in virtually every respect. He's just the man behind the project who's vaguely in charge of it.
The point is to change how much oil we need to use to do things, and eventually bring it to zero.
@@ivoryas1696 - like the tusks of elephants?
As someone who loves to play Terraforming Mars on a relatively frequent basis, this is some much appreciated context to everything you can do in that game
I'm unaware of how and where you can play this. Can you illuminate me please ?
pasoundman Err well it’s one of the most highly rated board games on boardgamegeek nowadays. Can’t tell you which of your personal local stores will sell it but I’m sure you can google it
@@Kuddochan found loads of terraformers via google later. weird !
@@Kuddochan if you want a game that involves terraforming a REALLY good one Terragenesis it even has different fractions with their own goals to achieve and you can colonize a whole bunch of different planets including random and custom ones if you pay a but extra (the base game is free though a lot of the game can be unlocked by beating different planets). You can even create your own biosphere with plants and animals you need to balance and maintain.
@@Kuddochan It’s still pretty high. Nominated for the Spiel de Jahares last year, in fact!
It didn’t win but… my shop has dedicated an entire shelf to it and all its expansions (and the Dune games). And we sell it quite regularly. It’s no Gloomhaven, but it’s doing quite well!
Looks like Mars doesn't have the nether which means it can't be habitable, looks like we need a portal and a ton of lava buckets.
XDXDXD this is no minecraft dude XDXD
I get the minecraft reference, but how does not having a nether make it uninhabitable?
@@NotFlappy12
liquid core, creating magnetosphere. Lava (magma), like in the Nether.
@@_Killkor oh... That's a dumb joke
@@NotFlappy12 at least there was an attempt
In order to make thing habitable, first you must need water so a 2x2 unlimited water source should be put first
I only have 5 iron got 1 ingot?
@@user-og6ei8pr7b Use the first Bucket two times, but I don't have Iron in any way.
@@user-og6ei8pr7b Use the extra two iron ingots for a sword.
Minecraft's physics just dont work, hope they make it just like lava
so how may ice cubes is that? : )
Those cinematic shots are amazing!
Your profile pic is amazing
So it seems to me like the one big hurdle to overcome here is the construction and maintenance of dynamos to shield mars, everything else seemed to be a more or less natural process that we could potentially speed up as well.
Maybe bezos and musk could work together to get this done.
One catch is, notice how he mentioned that about half the atmosphere/carbon dioxide is locked up as dry ice? Mars has an incredibly thin atmosphere, so even if you released all the carbon dioxide on the planet you might still not have an atmosphere thick enough for humans. It's certainly a start, but we may want to supplement it. That being said, I hear we humans are pretty good at pumping carbon dioxide into the air...
@@benwest5293 Ive seen other videos, PBS Spacetime did one talking about this, where they crunched some numbers and decided that it likely wouldn't be possible to get the atmosphere thick enough. I think it was PBS Spacetime.
@@benwest5293 Its not good enough for humans probably, but it sure enough might be good enough for the plants or smaller animals which can be used to kickstart the ecosystem on Mars.
@@jatzi1526 It's time to call China for help
@@_Killkor What?
It really does make me excited the thought of mars being colonized one day
Russian Mars empire hmmm...
Not going to happen
@@zikkicharade damn bro, that's crazy but I don't remember asking
@@papahairy5315 that kind or reply works if he was saying that to you
@@samarkand1585 didn't ask
"The only erosion feautures I** found"?? Holy mons you actually did a lot of research for this quality video! Thank you so much!
He literally spent so long staring at the Martian map that he found valleys they haven’t even name yet
I'm sorry because this is an awesome video but this time you made some wild hypothesis here. The Mars Express image of Hebes Chasma is made in "false colors". This is not what it looks like in real life but a combination of filters of the High Resolution Stereo Camera (HRSC) with an arbitrary color paletta that would make features of interest have a higher contrast. Thus, the green region is nothing related to life (in principle) and the blue regions are not water itself (misteriously captured just once). Nonetheless the OMEGA instrument onboard of Mars Express revealed gypsum to be present in the surface of Hebes Chasma; gypsum is a water-bearing mineral so it is easy to assume that Hebes Chasma once had water. But again you are not seeing wet lake beds here and the blue color is not what you would percieve as blue in real life.
If you want to take a closer view of those apparent "water flows" you should look at HiRise images from the MRO mission on the Hebes Chasma Region: www.uahirise.org/hiwish/view/9511
For example you can see here (hirise-pds.lpl.arizona.edu/PDS/EXTRAS/RDR/ESP/ORB_045700_045799/ESP_045736_1790/ESP_045736_1790_RED.abrowse.jpg), with a resolution of 27 cm/pixel, that the feature you point out in 11:01 is considered to be just a "dark landslide on northeast flank of Hebes Mensa", dark sand (proably not making dunes there and being smooth because of the slope).
Source 1: www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Mars_Express/Hebes_Chasma_a_trough_in_the_Grand_Canyon_of_Mars
Source 2: sci-hub.tw/10.1029/2018JE005658
Source 3: www.uahirise.org/ESP_045736_1790
Finally someone talks about the most interesting part of the entire video I was looking everywhere trying to find something about the lakes because like you think surface water on another planet would get a couple of news sites excited And have at least a few youtube videos made about it But I couldn't really find anything i guess this explains it. I gotta say tho it really does look like water flows And it's like at the hottest part of the planet in a deep pit where the atmosphere would be thicker But I guess I got excited for no reason got damn...
This video video was made in collaboration with Elon Musk
Maybe not only elon musk but other companies too
Nah, Elon's steps would have been: 1. Nuke Mars 2. Success
@@TheToso86 radiation
@@ladofthedamned7796 no one is denying it
Ew no thanks
I'm really enjoying this Mars series. Any chance at a Venus one after? I feel Mars is really recognizable, but Venus is hidden under thick clouds so I don't know much about it's geography.
It doesn't have much geography. The planet is so volcanically and tectonically active that any given point on the surface is short lived and doomed to be covered by lava flows or landslides
@@bluebonic3497 A quick google says that's false. Venus doesn't have tectonic plate. And while Earth's average surface age is 100 million years, Venus's is estimated at 300-600 million.
I wish we could go to Mars someday and terraform it, making it habitable.
Thanks for the tip now let me attempt to turn my mars habitable
Best way to make mars habitable? Scraping off the top layer of crust, and turning it into a space habitat.
Then scraping off the new top layer and doing the same.
And again.
And again.
And again.
By the end of it, you'll have several million earths worth of living area, all perfectly tailored to human specification.
Even to the ends of being giant multi-earth-sized zoos and ecosystems.
Interesting idea.
Mars has really good potential. It’s also really good because Mars is mostly co2 so if we just thicken the atmosphere we can keep mars warm. However the only challenge with mars is core is cold so it dosent have a magnetic-sphere but hopefully we can find ways. :)
Nukes baby!!
#nukethecore
He addresses this pretty early on in the video. We can place a dynamo at the L1 Lagrange point between Mars and the Sun and produce an artificial magnetic field there to shield Mars. You don't necessarily need to restart Mars' own magnetic field
@@benwest5293 its still theoretical
The problem with Venus is, it's closer to the sun. Terraforming a planet is a multi generational project (ie 100s of years if not 1000) and with each passing century sun is getting hotter so Venus will "soon" (in astronomical terms) fall off the inner edge of sun's habitable zone
Do you think that all those location names will stay the same or change if we actually colonise Mars?
Change obviously
Depends on whose the mayor.
They would stay the same since there is no reason to change them
@bnet sucks why would political correctness necessitate the renaming of Olympus Mons
@@justinbeath5169 man i imagine some 2100 retarded people saying "ohh those fuckin privileged earthlings decided our city's names,thats not fair"
Will there be countries on mars or the whole planet will be united and will only have a single ruling government for the whole planet. If world government will exist, what will be it's consequences and will it be for the greater good of humanity as a species.
A new video!
[Gandalf voice] "Hope is kindled"
Whili I enjoy the theoretical excercise, it always surprises me how some people really think living on Mars will be a thing in the future. Just imagine how much more costly it would be to change the martian athmosphere compared to prevent the earth climate from changing so much that Mars becomes a better place to live in.
Honestly we should try the upper sky of venus. High gravity, similar air pressure and temperature to earth, less radiation than Mars and dense lower clouds make floating airships possible.
Even if we somehow solved the massive problems like Mars dead core for example, gravity is an issue that we won't be able to solve, Mars just has way to low of gravity for any sort of long term settlement
If the U.S. discovers oil on mars the amount of money to maintain living their won't be an issue
Mars? More like Aires amirite
You know where the door is
@@ladofthedamned7796 I have multiple doors in my house
Step one: actually get there in the first place
This video has a number of issues stemming from the assumption that enough ice and frozen gas remains on Mars to make terraforming possible. The issues are gone into in great depth in this video describing an actual in depth terraforming procedure: ruclips.net/video/RcXBuYwm3xk/видео.html
Essentially though you can't terraform Mars without importing massive amounts of water as well as nitrogen and oxygen (potentially as co2 from Venus) from elsewhere. This is because most of the water and co2 that Mars used to have has been lost to the solar wind over time. Ultimately not enough co2 actually remains to create an atmosphere that would make liquid water possible. Mars also has weaker gravity than Earth, which means it actually needs a much thicker atmosphere to produce the same Earth-like atmospheric pressure.
Yeah it's a bit strange that he doesn't talk about the problems of terraforming at all.
Please just stop. Mars has permafrost all over. Research evidence by landers, rovers and martian meteorites. Some people really want to make things as difficult as they can, don't they, like Isaac Arthur you linked to - who makes SCI-FI fantasy videos not factual, realistic videos. I'm baffled you can't tell the difference.
@@strategicthinker8899 Firstly you don't address the lack of enough frozen gasses which is the bigger problem here. Secondly just because there's plenty of permafrost doesn't mean there's *enough* to support a whole hydrosphere with large above ground bodies of water. Maybe you should watch the video I linked because it actually runs the numbers rather than just going off of intuition.
For liquid water to exist 12 millibars of pressure is needed. Mars atmosphere is currently 6 millibars but in some really deep caverns on mars pressure reaches 12 millibars which indicates that even on present day mars liquid water on the Martian surface is possible. So creating enough atmosphere for liquid water on the surface of mars is possible considering the amount of dry ice at the Martian south pole
@@ryanhassett3733 even if we solve the water problem there's also the lack of a magnetic field and a dead core, which doesn't even seem possible to fix, and the even bigger problem we won't be able to fix (except through maybe genetic engineering) gravity, Mars gravity is way to low to have any long term settlements
Problem 1: Mars needs additional water.
Problem 2: Earth's seas are rising.
👀 I think we have an answer here, boys.
yes..
Give this man NASA science team, Bezos' bank account, and Musks' technology and we're pretty much set
Elon Musk is very unrealistic. How is he going to make a magnetosphere, which maybe the most important step in terraforming Mars??
I'm a researcher and my specialty is Mars. For the most part this is very good and accurate. I especially enjoyed the references to little-known features like Echus, Juventae, Welles, and Hebes. However, do a little research and you'll find photos from the ESA Mars Express orbiter of unimstakeable liquid lakes extant on Mars today; belying the party line that Mars is cold, dry and dead. (By the way, they have much better resolution and color than we ever get from NASA/JPL/MSSS). Also, I'm hoping for it to come in my lifetime, but I have yet to see any video about Mars that doesn't call it "The Red Planet". This is because of the over-hyped idea that the regolith is almost entirely iron oxide, which is ridiculous. OVERALL, the color is more like the Arizona desert. Thanks!
Study more, so far I see no mention of the need for nitrogen to create a stable atmosphere. Everywhere I see this sci-fi nonsense about 'terraforming' mentioned there is crickets about the vast amounts nitrogen needed.
@@frankderks1150 i gave you a thumbs up. there is nitrogen. 2.7% and the Argon is a noble gas at 1.6% but you make a good point about Nitrogen. I'm interested in seeing what they come up with.
I hate to burst everyone's bubble, but thats not water. The image in use is a false color image taken by the mars orbiter. Its mean to express the different rock layers visible to the camera. The real color you'd see in person is what google maps is showing. Sadly thats not liquid water pooling in Hebes Chasma.
The Legend Has Returned!
The magnetosphere problem is a myth, at least on human timescales, we do not need to give mars a manetosphere as long as we dont live for hundreds of millions of years.
What makes you believe that we would not want to live for hundreds of millions of years.
@@death_parade With our current technology trying to take care of more then a few millenia ahead, is idiotic and a waste of resources.
Yp. Very true. At least one commenter here is woke and not regurgitating old science from the 1980s. Congrats.
It can still be a problem because there can still be radiation and the atmosphere could be stripped much faster than that. We should do the L1 magnetic field thing or place ultra powerful magnets at the poles
@@therealspeedwagon1451 How exactly do you belive it could be gone in a short amount of time, when we know for a fact that it took hundres of millions of years with similar conditions to deplete it in the first place, this makes no sense only a very close/powerful gamma-ray burst or close super nova could do that.
The reason for a magnetosphere sattelite would be to provide some shielding while we create the atmosphere, not to prevent its errosion.
I’ve played TerraGenesis so I can do this shit in my sleep
Good video
Looks like a lot of work for this video. Well done!
Omg I love this channel
Me too
it stopped when I wanted to know about the biology part :(
Do a similar video on how can we terra form Moon
8:57, *cavities in Mars
Incredible view, graphic, animation etc. Excellent video trying to explain in so much of detail. Didn't even know all this names and places on Mars. Well made very informative video. Thanks a lot 👍🤘👌
It’s so sad how I’ll never see this in my lifetime. I’m 19 if anyone’s wondering.
Musk said he wants 1 million people on Mars by 2050
@@jonathanwilliams1065 Musk is smoking that good shit.
@@jiji-the-Legend No, he's just about the only person that could possibly pull it off.
No, no one is wondering
Are you and CPG grey related?
Well that was amazing. It'll probably take, at minimum, a few millennium to do. But damn do I want civilization to exist on Mars. It would be so cool.
That's pretty optimistic considering most professionals that study Mars say terraforming Mars is pure science fiction, some things just aren't possible. In all honesty Venus' atmosphere would be the best bet for colonization because you don't have to worry about one of the biggest problems with the idea of Mars colonization, the gravity being so low. Humans are evolved for the incredibly specific conditions on Earth, and even then we can only go about 5 miles up and about 7 down before we would die from lack of oxygen, high pressure or heat.
Find a huge water ice asteroid and slam it into mars
You play Universe Sandbox 2
@@Iberian_XAVO Never heard of it. Just seems like the obvious thing to do
@@kirkc9643 i though It was a joke because thats the only way to do It on the game
If it's made of water ice or other volatiles, it would be a comet
@@Aeturnalis good point
I think we are going to become cyborgs and will be able to live in space, inside artificial space stations, long before terraforming a whole planet to another earth.
we are probably gonna be dead, if humanity gets past its present issues someone in the future will potentially reach that level.
Maybe
Yeah turning a whole planet seems a bit far fetched tbh. Can someone remind me; why do we have to leave in the first place? Maybe just... idk, not start a nuclear war and destroy the planet? It’s going to get warmer on Earth wheather humans are here to accelerate it or not.
Cool
Newest data suggests that liquid water actually never existed on Mars' surface, and that the planet was once an ice ball planet.
source?
@@Momo-idky Very interesting, thanks. So it was likely not flowing water but glaciers that created these erosion marks, though the general shape that water would take if Mars were heated up remains the same.
G so how did it lose its ice?
Partypooper
*Trump 2224*
Make Mars great again!
_Forget red counties & red states. I'm running from the Red planet!_
- God Emperor Trump, floating down the corridor of Trump™ Space Station at Lagrange point 3.
Fully terraforming mars would take centuries!
in view of the fact that any method of terraforming is unknown to humanity, you can decide for yourself how long it might take but if terraforming were possible then it would likely take a very very long while.
I think it would take lots of thousands years.
So did building the USA...
Let's get started, then
@@marianconstantindumitriu6062 Only qa few hundred years for the USA.
Dark features in Hebes Casma are sand dunes. In infrared images volcanic rock/sand looks dark with bluish tint caused by heavy minerals rich in iron. What you see as pools of water, planetary geologists see as dunes made from heavy minerals sand. You can even see the 'flat lakebed' is actually convex - typical for large dunes. Sorry, but you are dead wrong in that regard.
I'm a big fan of introducing lichen as soon as possible to the surface of Mars.
Starting from zero huh... It's cool. I wanna se dinosaurs again
i am lichen that plan.
@@hosmerhomeboy roFL 🤣 😂 😆
KSR
Yeah we can't keep our Earth safe and know only 3% of our Earth. We dug only 0,002% of the way till earth's center and we can suddenly 'terraform' another planet and see clues from heckling sattelite image. I'm not a hater but this all looks like fairy tales
I bet everyone is here for the nerdiness, because we are all curious about stuff we probably have no use in knowing.
Hope Rock Nope. I am here to glg over nerdism
Anjay
You have one of the best voices on youtube.
Is this a Altas Pro video? Or a *Documentary*
Even if Mars isn't made habitable, just take me there now. Done with this damn planet. 😌
Happy to oblige.
Go to Antartica, it's the closest thing to Mars on this planet. It's cold, frigid and dry, just like the Martians like it.
Before you go to mars try to colided ceres to mars, ceres is much of water and can to making mars habitable
What you are describing here takes centuries of effort and an immense amount of money to fund it... with a fraction of that budget you could make life on Earth way better for all...
If we could put some giant lightning rods that goes into the planets core and then create a molten center again. It should work to make a magnetosphere, and all the drilling that need to be done would generate pollution that would trap the suns heat. Thereby heating it both from within and from the outside.
If we did make an artificial magnetism it would make an atmosphere, therefore making the planet able to trap the suns heat,that would instantly trigger a chain reaction event with the core of the planet starting to melt and ice becoming water on the surface etc.
There is nowhere near enough water on Mars to support any meaningful ecology. You’d need to add thousands of trillions of tons of water.
Oh my god, we need to go to Mars NOW
Yes, Better yet, why don't you all go. Grab the oppurtunity. Mars is great. Mars is awesome. I'm stayin here to watch the earth for you hehehe.
You must be hitting ceres to mars if you want to making mars habitable because ceres much of water
Yeah how about we save our own planet first
Why need earth when you can have Mars imperialism
@@realyoriginalchanel3218 why have Martian imperialism when you can have galactic imperialism
How about not storing our eggs in one basket, that’s the real problem, why not have a backup when things get out of hand, whether that’s climate change or a virus or nuclear war, anything
Our own planet is fine. Stop buying the lies of corrupt politicians and activists who have made billions profiting off the global warming hysteria
@@aespa690 it is not. Climate change is real and it’s going at a much faster pass than it normally does. We should be worried and we should stop it but that doesn’t mean we can do other things while we stop it
I helped Isaac Arthur on a video with a similar topic:
ruclips.net/video/RcXBuYwm3xk/видео.html
It's sad Mars lost most of its water when its magnetic field "Disapeared".
Sadly even if we could create a new magnetosphere, the geological activity that Mars still presents is unlikely to create an atmosphere with the rigth pressure to allow liquid water to flow. We could however direct icy meteorites to the planet therefor warming it and releacing both water and some gases
the answer is nukes lol
I realy dont get all of that Mars hype. Even if we use all these resources and more to terra form completely, mars will still not be an an atonamasly functioning Planet. Because of gravaty. The only way to change the gravaty on mars is 1. Add more mass or 2. Live in in rotating weel like citys. What is frankly speaking crazy. You can live on mars under the earth like a caveman and mine minarels and that's fine it will be profitable but only outposts are possible as a person cannot live their intire live with dutch low gravity and nobody wants it. As that brings health problems with it like heartfailior, blindness, savere osteoporosis ect. You also shouldn't get pregnant as that could kill the mother and the kid. We should not spend resources on something that is not possible anyway. If we terra form anything in the solar system then that should be venus as that is the only planet that is as big our planet and thus would have the same Gravaty if terra formed.
Did you watch the video?
@@chadleach6009 yes and he didn't sad one word about Gravaty.
@@sapereaudediogenes7282 what's the problem with gravity? It might not be ideal for human development but we certainly can survive there.
I have a dream, that one day we can Make Ares Green Again, then we can build back better.
I was on timeout on the stream near the end
I pray all scientist to make first earth habitable and explore all fish in ocean amd search for fresh water on earth i think their are most mystery on earth which has to be solved.
Considering that we really only have about 2 to 3 centuries left at best before we render our planet uninhabitable to humanity, it's quite obvious that a transition to Mars is necessary in order to preserve our species. The biggest challenges will likely not be solvable in that time frame - magnetosphere, breathable air, and perchlorate concentrations, which wasn't addressed. Honestly, it's in our best interest to start our feeble attempts at stabilizing Mars now while simultaneously working to preserve habitability on the planet that we evolved on.
...and triggered bootlicker conservatives will appear in ...3 ...2 ...1 lol
I know as a kid, i aways imagined the British setting up a colony on Mars in an attempt to recreate the British Empire
Humans: plans to terraform mars
Also humans: can't even save own planet from destruction
it hasn't gone yet though so no immediate need for earth 2.0
What destruction?
@@strategicthinker8899 He asks while Oregon and California are engulfed in fires so extensive that the sky in big cities glows orange with the flames and light levels are dimmed by the smoke. Have you not seen it on the telly ? Australia's turn later in the year. 500,000 ordered to evacuate in Oregon amid extensive property loss.
@@pasoundman oh no btw earth has been much warmer and life flourished its gona be fine
@@petarkukuljica4372 It's also been much colder in the past too ! Your point ? Life on earth will *ADAPT* as it always has. The best adaptation might be a radical reduction in population actually.
Are you reading with autotune ?
Anyways nice informative vid....
I swear to god, if we go to mars in the future and we name a territory something like “new America” I’m going to eat a shoe.
Please do. I guess you'd rather name it New Israel?
lol
Strategic Thinker, no actually, I’d rather have people come up with something unique and creative for once. Not everything has to be linked to another country you came from.
*how to make mars habitable*
terragenesis players: now this looks like a job for me
yea lol
The Sons of Hephaestus would like to know your location
@Huh ? I am a son
@@ragnarok3374 Nooooo Rangnarok ! You could have been the perfect planet to terraform !
@Huh ? We shouldn’t Terraform Planets as any life that was adapted to the Environment of the Planet beforehand would be killed because they couldn’t survive in conditions that we could. We could’ve studied the life on that Planet and stuff but then we will it off. We also shouldn’t Terraform Planets because many places on those planets might be flooded and many cool sights that maybe people would wanna see would be flooded and to never be seen again. Also by the time we would have Terraformed a planet, That Planet mostly likely have hundreds of Millions of People Living on it. We could easily live in Contained Habitations and not Terraform the Planet. Terraforming would be useless. The Last Reason I think we shouldn’t Terraform Planets is because low Elevation cities could be flooded. We would have to evacuate possibly millions of people to do that! Ya these are my reasons we shouldn’t Terraform Planets.
When are they going to make Uranus habitable?
It is already Johny, _it is already._
Yes very nice, one more attempt to explain how we could Terraform mars, without taking Gravaty into account. We can't live with sutch low Gravaty as it is present on mars. Or rather survive. If we Terraform anything than that should be Venus as that planet has nearly the same mass as earth and could in a Terraformed stade provide the same levels of Gravaty as earth does.
Yes! Somebody gets it! Thankyou!!! 👍👍👍
Thank you for an excellent video, the idea of a lake in Hebes Chasms is tantalising. However, I am struggling to find much information supporting this interpretation of the ESA satellite imagery in the scientific literature. Is there an alternative explanation for the blue areas in the satellite imagery? I find it hard to believe liquid water in the form of a lake on mars could have been overlooked when so much fuss was made about the recurring slope lineae.
First take care of Earth then think about putting your ass out in space
So for the Hebes Chasma part especially I thought it should be pointed out that the image you were looking at is not true color, its enhanced to be visually nice for us. The greens and blues arent really green and blue, you can tell especially that it's not true color by looking at the edges around the canyon to the surface of Mars and how bright it is that show just how enhanced and tuned some of the images are. What we actually see with our eyes is rather dismal and plain, most images are enhanced to liven it up for us.
I should also say, theres lots of conspiracy theorists out there who dont understand what that means. So I should try and be clear, the image where you're pointing out blues and greens from the ESA's Mars Express is not true color, you had lots of good images of true color showing just how dull it was. The blues and greens show where it is deeper.
if you think there's even a 1% chance of us terraforming mars in the next 50 you're stuck inside head. real life isn't starwars people!
we cant even terraform our own planet less alone another planet.
who said 50yrs? and how do you terraform the planet of origin from which the term is derived?
eleven. atmosphere
...
...
...
oh, those are roman numerals
Will be nice to have another blue planet in the Solar System
Neptune:
@@siriusk1453 hahaha
Steps to stop making Earth uninhabitable?
tryophobia
The production levels of my favorite RUclipsrs are so high rn