Its an explosive triggered by the control team, as soon as its doing something they dont want it to and it could land somewhere unwanted they blow it for safety
Then the Starship itself blew up - they all seem to have cut this out of the video - it was right at the end - it was meant to come down in the Pacific
Thank you for uploading this, that was a beautiful launch! Can't believe they finally got that skyscraper of a rocket into space. The launch pad looks to have survived too thanks to that water deluge system.
Omg the raptors didn't fail in 2:30 of burn . Incredible!!!! Absolutely stunning development. Major props to the space x raptor team. They burned bright and true.
The only reason they failed during the last lunch was because of the massive amount of debris from the launch pad that was kicked up during the launch.
@@danieldevito6380I have a hard time believing that the tornado of concrete *wasn't* a factor in the engine failures of IFT-1, but to my knowledge there hasn't been any official confirmation. Also, I think there were some engines out on this booster's static fire as well, which was with the deluge system active. I could be wrong, but I think this was the first time we'd seen all 33 Raptors light up at once, and the fact that they all remained lit all the way through ascent is incredible.
@@Delta-V-Heavy That's exactly what I said. The engines were damaged during the last launch when the launch pad couldn't take the incredible force from the 33 engines and blew apart. Not only did the engines take damage, but every structure within 300'+ of the launch took damage as well. With the amount of damage that was done to the pad area area after the last launch, the rocket was lucky to have even made it off of the ground.
It's surprising that all 33 raptor engines fired the whole time to stage separation when they are a bit of a hodge podge of versions on these first few boosters.
The only reason why B7 suffered so many engine failures was because of the debris kicked up from the pad and the fire that raged through the engine section.
I’m convinced that the breakup of the launch pad caused the Raptor engines to fail in the first launch. No launch pad destruction= no engine destruction. That was key and was what I thought happened the first time after seeing the launch pad destruction and how far concrete flew from onsite reports.
@@ed0078I would argue it was a great success, my guess is that they were expecting reaching RUD, and it being in 2nd stage with the 33 raptor motors on full throttle is a huge accomplishment.
RUD is a bit of a meme in the community, which is why it's often used. Terms like 'blew up,' 'explosion,' or 'fireball' are often not used because they can be misleading. Destruction of a vehicle can be caused by any number of things--for example, atmospheric stresses--which may produce a breakup that *looks* like an explosion but could not be accurately classified as one. There's also the differences between a detonation and a conflagration, which further muddy the waters. The generally accepted term to describe anything that deviates from mission expectations is 'Anomaly,' which is incredibly nonspecific. It is used, not because other words are scary, but because it would be irresponsible to use any more specific terms before what actually happened has been narrowed down. Anomaly, used in the moment, means something has gone wrong or generally not according to plan; more specific terms are only used later, once the precise nature of the anomaly is known. SpaceX likes to use Rapid Unscheduled Dissassembly for catastrophic anomalies--at least those in which no one is harmed--because it's more fun to say.
Not only can you see the explosion in the top of the booster after separation but the hot staging also damaged ship 25's engines causing the automatic FTS to fire.
I get WHY they're hot staging I guess, but idk, doesn't seem like that must thrust can be safely staged like that and have the booster be fully operational. Seems like a stretch, but I hope I'm wrong!@@straighttalk2069
"And, as you can see, the super heavy booster has just experienced a rapid unscheduled disassembly..." Huh, it did...what? Number-5 "No, no disassemble!"
Nah the explosion came from the engines. They were exploding one by one like a domino effect. It took like 10 seconds for the booster to fully explode after the first engines blew. The hotstaging ring did its job well I think.
0:44 can see heat shield tiles falling off Starship !!! This remains a huge problem for them. Would be more productive to start with a disposible 2nd stage for lauching Starlink sats.
The explosion was a result of catastrophic engine failure. They were exploding one by one like a domino effect after the first ones popped. It took like 10 seconds for the booster to fully explode after the first engines blew. The hotstaging ring did its job well I think.
I HAVE A QUESTION....the separation of the 1st and 2nd (MECO) went without a hitch....so after the separation the booster had an unscheduled disassembly happen correct? The starship is unfazed by this, and keeps going. Why did starship explode?
I have instead the feeling that the hot staging is a risky choice if you want avoid Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly of the stage that you want to recovery.
@@andreabindolini7452 hot staging is actually pretty common. Maybe some first time kinks in the software or in the actual joining. I'm sure they will let us know soon.
The difference was 50 years ago we built rockets just to get there and return with an insane budget NASA hasn’t seen in decades. Now we’re building the technology for long term sustainable colonies on the moon so it’s a little different than before.
@@jamieravioli3225 uhhh no? It’s severely under budget. The US military takes the cake I don’t know where you got NASA having the biggest budget over any other government organization.
He's already set up the first global internet available literally everywhere. What do want, for him to come to your house and suck your dick? Piss off.
такой космос нам не нужен (с) надеюсь, єти хлопці, таки, посерьйозней станут относиться к своим проєктам, успехов! We don’t need such space (c) I hope these guys will take their projects more seriously, good luck!
no.. that isnt even the most cheering you could hear but because twitter downgrades everything related to streams the cheering employees are a great bonus because they've spent so much time working on starship and the launch site and to see it finally lift off for a second time with all the added upgrades is amazing
@@ufloc don’t forget that you might be talking to one of those who believes that space doesn’t exist and this is all a hoax, there’s no fixing those people!
The test was a success really. They hadn't got anything planned for after separation. Both vehicles were destined to land in the sea. So the fact starship practically made it to orbit is a great bonus
![Baby Kia - GLOVES & DRACS (BLACK AF1s) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ajm8LeB0qQk/mqdefault.jpg)
I love how the booster was nice enough to let the Starship leave before blowing up.
Apparently its "Rapid Disassembly" ............ to soften the BLOW!
Its an explosive triggered by the control team, as soon as its doing something they dont want it to and it could land somewhere unwanted they blow it for safety
Self destruct or massive structural failure ?
Falcon 9 makes the same maneuver with no issues.
It didn't blow up it was blown up by a UAP
Then the Starship itself blew up - they all seem to have cut this out of the video - it was right at the end - it was meant to come down in the Pacific
Thank you for uploading this, that was a beautiful launch! Can't believe they finally got that skyscraper of a rocket into space. The launch pad looks to have survived too thanks to that water deluge system.
Omg the raptors didn't fail in 2:30 of burn . Incredible!!!! Absolutely stunning development. Major props to the space x raptor team. They burned bright and true.
The only reason they failed during the last lunch was because of the massive amount of debris from the launch pad that was kicked up during the launch.
@@danieldevito6380I have a hard time believing that the tornado of concrete *wasn't* a factor in the engine failures of IFT-1, but to my knowledge there hasn't been any official confirmation. Also, I think there were some engines out on this booster's static fire as well, which was with the deluge system active. I could be wrong, but I think this was the first time we'd seen all 33 Raptors light up at once, and the fact that they all remained lit all the way through ascent is incredible.
@@Delta-V-Heavy That's exactly what I said. The engines were damaged during the last launch when the launch pad couldn't take the incredible force from the 33 engines and blew apart. Not only did the engines take damage, but every structure within 300'+ of the launch took damage as well. With the amount of damage that was done to the pad area area after the last launch, the rocket was lucky to have even made it off of the ground.
Another "rapid, unscheduled disassembly"😂😂😂
yeah, big boom does do that.
Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly .. LOL LOL LOL 😂😂😂 I can’t wait to use that on something 😂😂😂
SpaceX has been using that term since Falcon 9 was still a prototype.
It's surprising that all 33 raptor engines fired the whole time to stage separation when they are a bit of a hodge podge of versions on these first few boosters.
The only reason why B7 suffered so many engine failures was because of the debris kicked up from the pad and the fire that raged through the engine section.
I’m convinced that the breakup of the launch pad caused the Raptor engines to fail in the first launch. No launch pad destruction= no engine destruction. That was key and was what I thought happened the first time after seeing the launch pad destruction and how far concrete flew from onsite reports.
Launching a statue of liberty sized rocket is indeed a Starship.
Great success. All 33 engines full-dur is insane.
I would not have used the word ‘Great”. 2nd stage reaching RUD is death
its data not death@@ed0078 this is useful not wasteful
@@ed0078I would argue it was a great success, my guess is that they were expecting reaching RUD, and it being in 2nd stage with the 33 raptor motors on full throttle is a huge accomplishment.
@@evaro0233Yeah, first stage performance appeared to be 100% nominal during its primary mission, which is a huge step up from IFT-1.
That was the nicest description of an explosion I have ever heard.
To the Moon Alice, woo hoo!! Go SpaceX!!! 🚀🌛
LOL "a rapid, unscheduled disassembly"...LONG STICK GO BOOM!
As John Candy would say: That first stage "experienced a rapid unexpected disassembly real good!"
Absolutely Fantastic Flight
Props to dear Elon humanity is behind you great hero......
I was watching the stream with a friend on Discord, and the dude synced free bird to when the ship launched.
Just say explosion. Come on, don't make Orwell say "I told you so".
Unbelievable acceleration.
You noticed that too?! Kicks butt like a Tesla as I experienced in my brother's Model S when he mashed the pedal...what a rush!
Rapid, Unscheduled, disassembly. It blew up. It's ok to say it.
RUD is a bit of a meme in the community, which is why it's often used. Terms like 'blew up,' 'explosion,' or 'fireball' are often not used because they can be misleading. Destruction of a vehicle can be caused by any number of things--for example, atmospheric stresses--which may produce a breakup that *looks* like an explosion but could not be accurately classified as one. There's also the differences between a detonation and a conflagration, which further muddy the waters. The generally accepted term to describe anything that deviates from mission expectations is 'Anomaly,' which is incredibly nonspecific. It is used, not because other words are scary, but because it would be irresponsible to use any more specific terms before what actually happened has been narrowed down. Anomaly, used in the moment, means something has gone wrong or generally not according to plan; more specific terms are only used later, once the precise nature of the anomaly is known. SpaceX likes to use Rapid Unscheduled Dissassembly for catastrophic anomalies--at least those in which no one is harmed--because it's more fun to say.
what are the 3 strange lights that apper on the screen from 4:11 seconds to 4:13 seconds
Yes! the Starship SN24 goes to orbit! But the booster exploded. Successful Launch!
Thats S25. S24 flew on the first flight
Failure is part of the process if you dont want to spend 10x the cost on engineering
its not failure its data, so many people have smooth brains.@@426shelby426
To bad the mission failed mins after reaching space.
It failed. Failure is a good thing. You learn from your mistakes.
This is history baby!
Amazing job SpaceX!!! Probably 3x better than the 1st flight and almost got to "almost" orbit - probably 15 more seconds of acceleration.
Definite progress.
This is fantastic. And dissassembly is a very nice word for what happened lol. 👌
Why did you cut the video?
Hamas claims responsibility for the unscheduled disassembly
What
Why make everything political
😂😂😂
😂😂
Wait. Is the ultimate plan for the booster to come back and do that amazing landing?
Looks like they're gonna try it.
That is indeed their intention. Reusing the booster will save so much money and time.
WHY DID THE RECORDING CUT OFF AT 5 MINUTES AND 45 SECONDS?
I think the heat shield failed right after full ignition and separation with the hot staging. Blew the top of booster to bits.
Not only can you see the explosion in the top of the booster after separation but the hot staging also damaged ship 25's engines causing the automatic FTS to fire.
I get WHY they're hot staging I guess, but idk, doesn't seem like that must thrust can be safely staged like that and have the booster be fully operational. Seems like a stretch, but I hope I'm wrong!@@straighttalk2069
"And, as you can see, the super heavy booster has just experienced a rapid unscheduled disassembly..." Huh, it did...what?
Number-5 "No, no disassemble!"
wow，go galaxy and beyond
Beautiful
Great job
They will find Starship hanging out with guy in the Tesla! 🤣
I think the Mach diamond from the second stage put a hole in the top of the booster. I acted like an acetylene torch. Just my thought.😊
Nah the explosion came from the engines. They were exploding one by one like a domino effect.
It took like 10 seconds for the booster to fully explode after the first engines blew.
The hotstaging ring did its job well I think.
Браво
не завидуй!
I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT I LOVE THE SPACE VERY VERY OK
0:44 can see heat shield tiles falling off Starship !!! This remains a huge problem for them. Would be more productive to start with a disposible 2nd stage for lauching Starlink sats.
Awesome footage, it was a test though, need some work, awesome! Musk is a crazy dude but awesome in his way!
The explosion was a result of catastrophic engine failure. They were exploding one by one like a domino effect after the first ones popped.
It took like 10 seconds for the booster to fully explode after the first engines blew.
The hotstaging ring did its job well I think.
Space the final frontier
It is great!!!!!
:48 - The moment 33 Raptor engines became one
What Happened to the Starship Flight alone? Did it make it to Hawaii?
Viagem ano qué vem só .
Which direction did it go ? East over Florida or southeast?
I believe Southeast out past Cuba
@@UKStormSeekers Thank you
Yess!!!!
A rapid unscheduled disassembly. Translation: It blew the fuck up...
I HAVE A QUESTION....the separation of the 1st and 2nd (MECO) went without a hitch....so after the separation the booster had an unscheduled disassembly happen correct? The starship is unfazed by this, and keeps going. Why did starship explode?
Idk, looked like the hot staging was a bit too hot?
There was a propellant leak which either caused it to explode or caused the flight termination system to activate after going off course.
Getting stage separation on only its 2nd test flight is huuuuge
It’s fake, why did it explode ?
I don’t understand why this is so hard for them it’s not like it’s rocket science.
What happened to the star ship
I think this 2nd test was very successful even the heavy booster exploded
4.07 some lights apearing like UFOs or something
Genial 😁
Hahahaha,
Well done guys, well done
What i see is pieces of a rocket polluting the ocean, is that wrong?
Why did it explode
I had a feeling they would detonate the first stage just to prove they fixed the problem with the emergency detonation.
Certainly popped it faster this time
I have instead the feeling that the hot staging is a risky choice if you want avoid Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly of the stage that you want to recovery.
@@andreabindolini7452 hot staging is actually pretty common. Maybe some first time kinks in the software or in the actual joining. I'm sure they will let us know soon.
@@russcarroll3176 It is common. But not among wanna-be reusable rockets.
Maybe the Moon one day. It was so easy 50 years ago !
The difference was 50 years ago we built rockets just to get there and return with an insane budget NASA hasn’t seen in decades. Now we’re building the technology for long term sustainable colonies on the moon so it’s a little different than before.
@@jamieravioli3225 uhhh no? It’s severely under budget. The US military takes the cake I don’t know where you got NASA having the biggest budget over any other government organization.
That was fun but can I have twitter back
What happened to starship? The video just ends before we learn where it went or what happened to it.
Universe welcome to 2023 November 19th with-in 19 minutes of time
That's an expensive BOOM...
Where does the ship go ?! 🎉
💯 %.
It’s not about starship boom, it’s about humanity doom.
Rapid unscheduled disassembly 😂😂
Is it normal for a space ship to tilt like that?
Yep, that’s how you get into orbit properly
It is yeah. To get to orbit you have to start traveling parallel to the ground. If you burn straight up you'll just come back down x
I’m afraid.
No explota... choca contra el domo...😂
And Boom 💥
Compare this to Apollo. 😂😂😂
🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍
This does nothing for humanity, it's all for one big filthy rich ego!🙄
He's already set up the first global internet available literally everywhere. What do want, for him to come to your house and suck your dick? Piss off.
BRUH I THOUGHT IT WAS AN TRUCK BRUH!!!
🤣🤣🤣
такой космос нам не нужен (с) надеюсь, єти хлопці, таки, посерьйозней станут относиться к своим проєктам, успехов!
We don’t need such space (c) I hope these guys will take their projects more seriously, good luck!
Ready to explode
Are those screamming tracks added? Really?
The control room always has employees watching in the back. The assumption that they’re screaming tracks is hilariously sad 😂
Yeah and earth is flat and there’s also a dome right?😂
no.. that isnt even the most cheering you could hear but because twitter downgrades everything related to streams
the cheering employees are a great bonus because they've spent so much time working on starship and the launch site and to see it finally lift off for a second time with all the added upgrades is amazing
@@ufloc don’t forget that you might be talking to one of those who believes that space doesn’t exist and this is all a hoax, there’s no fixing those people!
No.
maybe it is the 18th... 6+6+6
Blowed up again. Great job, engineers.
Great job, English teachers.
Thats literally the point of FTS... Another goober learning about rockets from CNN news...
Oh no they decided to test stuff instead of spending 10x the cost on engineering
its called testing, incase you cant understand.
It was going to crash into the ocean anyway. It just wanted to make a spectacular exit.
Look at that pile of money going nowhere for nothing.
😧: It's too bad! fail again...
The test was a success really. They hadn't got anything planned for after separation. Both vehicles were destined to land in the sea. So the fact starship practically made it to orbit is a great bonus
Another ilona success, like a tesla while mental insane clap their hands.Wonderfull
CGI