That was very cool. I assume the constant squidgy noises were the attitude thrusters and their valves. If felt like I was fhere. SciFi movies should use this soundtrack. Thanks for posting. 👍
It's one thing for the fantastic picture quality on this, it's another for the fact *it has sound!*. Getting the sounds of the experience as part of the visuals just makes all the difference, gives it that extra presence.
That was so cool!! RCS firing, initial atmospheric entry, then re-entry, aerodynamic braking, then drogues and brilliant beautiful main chutes. What a ride!
Wow-awesome! As a child of the 60s who watched all the Apollo re-entries, I’ve never seen it this way. What a treat! Really expected more plasma upon reentry. Amazingly quiet ride until it hit the atmosphere. Hearing RCS at work was interesting too. This is the closest I will ever get to experiencing re-entry. Thanks for the video.
@@joefunk1611 Not an awful lot. It's indeed expected. Orion here is performing a "skip reentry" which is the very first time a human rated capsule has done this. In the past engineers couldn't really figure out a way to confidently pull it off, but technology has improved and this can be done now automatically without a crew as Orion here demonstrated. Imagine a stone being skipped on a puddle of water, well something similar is happening here. The exact burns have to be very precise and the RCS must be able to quickly adjust the orientation of the heatshield. For Apollo, the capsule would land several miles/km from their expected landing zones, which made recovery operations very difficult and they risked landing in an unsafe zone. The skip maneuver gives Orion much more control on where to land. This skip maneuver also eases reentry g-forces which should make the descent more comfortable for the astronauts.
@@jrc1606 thanks very much. Great explanation and now it makes sense. Gives a lot more confidence as I always thought the capsules shape was itself ‘self corrective’ but what you said really give some understanding and confidence I wasn’t feeling until now :).
To hear the thrusters working is something else. Sounds like something is smacking the side of the capsule, but thats the attitude adjustment thrusters, and I never knew how much adjustment was needed during reentry and how it’s automated now, gives new respect to how they did it in the early days of space travel without the complex computer navigation systems we have today.
Can't believe its taken this long for a full re-entry video uncut from orbit to ocean being uploaded to youtube. You normally always see videos that get cut away to animations or ground camera footage halfway trough. And the raw audio instead of some generic spacy discovery channel music was really cool too.
No Fr. I wonder how much it costs to add recording footage. I just can’t imagine it being too much in this day and age. I’m surprised every unit wasn’t equipped all around with recording devices
@@JohnHansknechtArtemis' re-entry was done exactly like it needed to be, just like during Apollo. The Apollo CM did not use a ballistic entry approach because it would have burned up in re-entry. NASA opted for a non-ballistic re-entry approach by skipping off the Earth's atmosphere once to dissipate the CM's re-entry velocity and lower the heating loads to the shielding. Artemis is still using the same re-entry technique and they have to. The Space Shuttle re-entered the atmosphere from LEO at Mach 25. Artemis' re-entry speed was Mach 32. This maneuver was very necessary.
This has got to be the coolest video I've ever seen. From the views of the Earth, the way the thrusters cut in and out (I didn't think they'd behave like that) to watching the plasma stream from breaking through the atmosphere. This is hands down some of the coolest footage ever recorded.
I’m not sure most people understand how fast this thing is going. Watching the swaths of ocean and cloud formations moving so fast is insane. Great video!
@@snakeeyes3733not necessarily, most of the world is water. And this was a pretty short clip and the craft reentered over the ocean on purpose to make a water landing.
I’m 68 years old, so I remember John Glenn orbiting the earth 3 times. Which captured my imagination as a young boy and after watching this incredible video, it made me a little sad, knowing that I was born in a generation that will never experience space travel as a tourist.
If it makes you feel any better, I'm 23, but I'm also sad that I'm guaranteed to never ever be able to travel through the galaxy at the speed of light but some lucky generation thousands of years in the future will have that privilege and probably be able to see intergalactic planets and solar systems and even meet aliens. It's not fair to be born into such a vast universe and not be able to see even the smallest percentage of it.
Lunar return velocity, purposefully skipping the craft off the atmosphere to attain a more controlled final descent... The final attitude change into a more vertical orientation brought with it such a wild rush of "here we go," and went we did. Like others have said, a velocity/telemetry display would be quite an addition, but like subtitles in a movie, it would have taken me out of the moment of just experiencing what happened there. Truly magnificent.
Awesum! Thank you! I'm 71 and have been watching space flights all my life. But this is a 1st time Marvin the Martian internal view of re-entry and landing. Well done. Looking forward to more!
@@wirebeam I'm also 71, we would've been in 4th or fifth grade, so yeah it would've been pretty much our whole lives. This was back when space flight was new and novel. Unless you lived it back then, you can't understand the excitement each mission provided our young minds.
@@LogicCastersee every time I see a science related video it’s just two people like yourselves both asserting that you’re correct. Who am I supposed to listen to? Neither of you. You did nothing but cancel each other out. It’s Almost as if you never commented at all
Amazing. Not how I pictured the thrusters functioning at all. Congrats to all the hard working engineers and technicians who made that possible. The sounds in real time were enlightening
@@gordon1201 I'm curious if the thrusters only fire for a set period of time and the computer keeps repeatedly firing them until it's in the right position. Or if the thrusters keep firing continuously without shutting off until it's in the right position. Does that make sense?
Are they thrusters or deflection style panels for adjustable direction and speed decrease ? That's what I assumed for whatever reason by the sounds lol
I think this video is a true first for nearly EVERYONE (except the Astronauts). I have scoured the internet my whole life and have never found any full re-entry footage, let alone in HD... Normally it's SD shuttle videos. This was incredible to watch!!!!!!!
@@SamBorgman EDIT: Sorry my first sentence sounds very aggressive. I didn't intend it to be. Did I say anything about OP specifically being the one to record and release this? No. But the fact remains it's on their channel first. Obviously this footage was shot with NASA's hardware and control.
@@madezra64 heh instant internet rage, nice. You could have edited the comment itself lol. I was saying if you have searched for video like this you've probably missed it since this channel could only get this from somewhere on the internet. There might be newer clearer better videos of re-entry out there too.
The extreme amount of calculation needed to make this spacecraft not bounce off the atmosphere and be lost in space forever is insane.. you can see just how much effort it takes with all those extremely small adjustments it makes… god i love physics
First time I've seen a full video of any #NASA use of #Skip #Re-Entry Too! It's a shame they waited over a year to release it publicly. Suggested to #NASA they rename the whole #Artimis SlS programme with #Arthritis lol They were not amused 😂
@@luis-sophus-8227 "I'm too lazy/stupid to try and understand complicated concepts so everyone who actually knows what they're talking about must be wrong." Yeah, it's everyone else. Not you.
Thank you for showing me what its like to slow down from orbital velocity all the way to splashdown. I waited all my life to witness that. Great video!
Incredible stuff. Really makes you think just how close these capsules and other crafts and their occupants are to being completely annihilated every time they come home. The fact that we can send things and people into space and bring them home safely is amazing. There really is no margin for error when it comes to re-entry. I hope we will see more views like this in the future.
@@skater4life2360 …you mean while it was flying over the Indian Ocean, north of Australia and over the Pacific Ocean until splashdown on the Pacific Ocean? I guess it’s easier to just say whatever nonsense comes to mind than to actually understand what’s going on, huh? It’s always the most ignorant people with the strongest opinions lol Why think about it when you can just say it’s nothing but VFX lol
@@skater4life2360The capsule was very close to earth, so it’s probably that the land masses were just out of view. And if NASA was just faking this (which they are not) I don’t think that not adding continents to the model would pass the editing team that easily.
As a Star Trek and Star Wars fan and as someone who regularly fantasizes about space travel, and as someone who has played countless space simulators... I declare this to be the best video ever uploaded to RUclips... and the most proper use of the platform... ever.
@@kwimms great comment... nice to read one with some actual common sense. the rest of these brainless mainstream media fed sheeple would still believe this was real even if the captions read, "simulation"
@@LevelEarth2021 Moon only has different shape phases because the earth is a sphere. Moon is upside down in southern hemisphere vs the northern hemisphere. Planes have to adjust their flight path angle otherwise they would technically end up flying straight into space. These things are only possible on a spherical planet. Shush 🤡
@@Vector_Ze I have a feeling that might be some kind of purge, just to expend the fuel before it hits the water. I could be wrong though, it just seemed logical.
One minute you’re watching the earth from space through that window as superheated plasma begins to rip by, to 25 minutes later when you see liquid water wash across the same window at splash-down! Amazing footage and so cool to keep the original audio.
@@Jelly_Juice2006 pacific is around 9500 miles wide... the craft would be traveling at over 18,000 mph before entering atmos. it would cross the pacific in less than 30 min at that speed. I would expect to see land
@@skater4life2360you're not much of a thinker are you buddy.ill put this simple for you and then you can go and watch any of the countless videos of the science varies who will tell you why that happened as quite frankly I can't be bothered. Just because you didn't see something doesn't mean it isn't there,if you watch a video of say the iss streams it takes a decent amount of time between continents something that is orbiting the earth and not descending into it therefore the artemis is descending and not so much orbiting around the earth at a speed like the iss which as I said is moving across the earth essentially.i can't be bothered to go in depth because you're clearly very dull and wouldn't get it so I'll leave it there 😢
Love the thruster firing sound. And visually, the effects the RCS thrusters have on the plasma sheath is amazing. Love the bits of heat shield char sitting on the window. Only thing better to see that this would be a time lapse from an on orbit position, or even just real time. And you can tell it never fully left atmosphere on its skip maneuver.
Orion never enters low earth orbit after returning from lunar orbit. That’d require as much energy as the TLI in the first place, and is why the reentry speed is so insanely high.
I was wondering what was building up in the window, I thought it could be loose debris inside the capsule. Hard to imagine fragments of the heat shield laying on the outside of the window in such an extreme environment
@@braindare1351 interestingly, one of the reasons for Artemis 2 just having been postponed, is “unexpected erosion” of the ablative heat shield. Whether or not the debris seen on the window is a representation of that, I don’t know.
@@ArKritz84 excellent observation. Just my opinion but the failures of NASA go far deeper than a few technical issues that would have been solved in months during the space race. I Don'🤞t know what is more difficult these days , technical issues or bureaucratic ones
@@braindare1351 changing political priorities is definitely hamstringing long-term programs the most. And crewed deep-space missions are definitely long-term in their development. This leads to budget limitations, which leads to technical issues. That said, I'm not sold on the idea that crewed deep space missions should be pursued at all. The juice doesn't seem to be worth the squeeze.
Whenever I see videos looking at earth from space, I love trying to think about what I was actually doing where I live on that day. Seeing this perspective, knowing that while this was happening I was at work and going through my daily life. It's just a cool little thought I like to have once in a while.
I have this thought too but I first remember having it with movies or TV shows. I'd be thinking "I wonder what I was doing at the exact moment this scene was being shot" lol.
Очень атмосферное видео , и шум клапанов двигателей ориентации, и искры отлетающих частиц термоэкрана. И плазма танцующая в вихре. И брызги океана на иллюминаторе..... Как будто сам из космоса вернулся )))
That's because there is little to no sound outside the atmosphere, and inside the outer atmosphere it's very quiet. So you're only hearing the sounds coming from inside the craft
@@moosman4217 Not entirely. Sounds also travels via conduction. So the outside sound of the craft conducted through the structure and into the camera mic.
Possibly to get rid of the last remaining propellant. The thrusters use hypergolic fuel, that is some nasty stuff. The capsule makes sure to dump it all out to make aproaching the capsule safer.
I am 70 now. I watched the Apollo 11 moon mission on TV broadcast from start to finish. But we never saw any video of the interior during landing return to earth. So this must be the same experience the astronauts had. Thank you for this.
At 22:54 there is what sounds like lots of RCS firing. Do they use RCS at this point to slow the descent more than what the parachutes can do? Or possibly also done to get rid of most of the remaining hypergolic fuel and oxidizer? Anybody out there know?
It's pretty funny that in hollywood re entries are always depicted like your spacecraft is a fuel truck exploding into a violent and chaotic trail of thick flames like it's burning while in reality the plasma is more similar to your thin cooking gas stove flame but stretched into a long trail but it remains translucent enough you still can see in details earth's curve and cloud formations. In movies it's like somebody threw a molotov cocktail on the craft and let it burn😂
in the movies is where you have thunderous fireball explosions in the vacuum of space by battles of militaries from various star systems. And they all have spacecraft of superluminal flight with precision accuracy of darting across the galaxy with no abberation of the space-time continuum (or g-forces) with insane amounts of power, along with directed energy weapons. And when they engage in battles they do it just like 18th century navies.
@@wrightmfWell I wasn't thinking about those. More like movies depicting real space historical events like The Right Stuff (1983) Apollo 13 (1995) Gagarin First In Space (2013) or Salyut 7 (2017) to name a few. In each of these movies it always has to look chaotic out of control like it's a fuel tank bursting into flames.
I hate that they hide so many space footage from us , even of strange things they see out there. I hate this human civilization. Earth needs to blow up already haha
Just because you see something on a "screen" doesn't make it real. I saw Bruce Willis land on an asteroid and blow it up to save the world. Looked pretty real to me. Just sayin'
You would've at least expected the CGI folks to make the earth consistently round.. Shoddy work even for NASA.. ;) Throw in a few stars in the darkness of space... Get a better looking sun..
@@skater4life2360What exactly do you get out of ignoring what is so obvious? Nobody has any reason to lie. We’ve spent centuries figuring out how to get to space so there’s no reason why the technology isn’t there. Why is this so hard to believe for you? It’s a basic principle. Fireworks can go up so what makes you think we can’t make a gigantic one and shoot it out of our planet?
@@BuddySpike101 with current materials science and computer technology, we should have "moon bases" by now. I don't think they can get past the firmament
i absolutely love how Earth looks from up there, especially the atmosphere colours and all the clouds covering those beautiful blue oceans. i'm glad we reached the point where this kind of thing can be done by humans and most importantly, the footage is acccessible to all of us. thank you! edit: a compliment in our achievements leads to comments disaster. AVOID.
What is the clicking noise along with the sudden changes in the view through the window, of what’s happening outside the Orion, when breaking through the atmosphere?
I don't think there'd be a lot to see. Here we actually are hearing and seeing all the microsecond RCS adjustments to keep the capsule in the optimum re-entry orientation.
Is this window in front or behind shot of bein in motion? Adjusters adjusting what? Then if its automated now how did Apollo 11 and 12 do there reentry?
wow, you'd really expect the thrusters to sound like movies portray them, but honestly i love the real sounds more. like its literally just "THOMP-THOMP. THOMP. THOMP-THOMP" and it really gives you a feel of just how precise and accurate those little bursts have to be in order to stop sheer calamity from occurring
So many amazing things in this spectacular video. The double entry, the plasma, the RCS firing, the deposition of combustion products on the window, the deployment of the drogue and main chutes, and the landing in the water -- just amazing. Also, the perspective, looking backwards, is not something you often see. I just wish there was a telemetry overlay!
This was so great, thank you Zach. I recall NASA reporting that this was a "Skip Re-entry" manoeuvre. It was so cool to see it all happen from beginning to end. 😁
I think it’s called “reefing”. There’s a super interesting history learning of how much of an actual engineering problem figuring out how to reliably get it to work truly was. And that was in the early days of skydiving & ejection seat development. X 1000 for operations such as re-entry on top of that.
That was awesome, and thoroughly fascinating to watch! Would be really cool to have a version with some commentary or pop-ups explaining what's happening. Maybe even a telemetry overlay showing relative speed, altitude, position, etc.
@@eckee angle relative to the surface, velocity, acceleration (or rather, deceleration), altitude, perhaps a model of the surface showing where it is relative to the surface, stages in the program, what thrusters are firing and why, I can think of a lot of things that are going on. It looks like there was a "bounce" over the atmosphere where it grazed by and took a lot of speed off, before bouncing back off the atmosphere for a second entry later, and it looked like it was turning over to balance the load on the heat shields like you'd turn over a burger on a grill. this was way more than just flying the thing into the atmosphere, would be super cool to see how the computer was interpreting what was happening and when it decided it was time to turn over, deploy different parachutes, etc.
@@almicc yea. I'd love to have a full debrief too but even the illustrations made by NASA itself shows incorrect flight trajectory, especially the reentry. There are so many exiting things and so many details about spaceflight yet NASA treats their audience like dumb kids
It’s amazing that there are humans who have built a machine which can travel to the moon and back, and then it can land on a dime, yet there are other humans who still swear that the Earth is flat.
It's incredible how it travels two or three countries in a matter of seconds! And the sound emitted by the trajectory correction is quite fascinating too.
This is crazy imagine being there with bits flying off the craft all over the place you've got to have big balls to be an astronaut. Amazing video thank you
@@Ih8liarsandusers The keyword is "imagine". He's saying imagine being in there and seeing bits flying off (which is normal). The astronauts he's referring to is just a general statement. Nowhere did he say that there were astronauts in this vehicle. Learn to comprehend what you read before commenting.
@@skater4life2360 Why? Below the clouds? You have to take in perspective, that the curvature we are seeing isn't that strong in reality because it is a wide angle camera. So the area we see is not as big as you think.
Awesome! It looks like the ship re-enters atmosphere 2 times, the first to lose some speed and next to fall to the earth. It should be interesting if there is a telemetry with altitude and speed data shown in real time
I would not even use the term "spinning" for a slowly rotating ball that needs 24 hours for one single revolution. And I don't in what way you expect to see it hear. So many people just have no idea that speed is always relative.
@@sebastiannolte1201no it's not relative. That's a nonsense term came up with liars to avoid the fact we are not moving. No proof we are spinning. All the proof says the exact opposite. Like stars. And the Sun that move over us.
Loved this, the stability at super speed grazing the atmosphere, burning off speed, bouncing off the air, amnd the second contact at much slower was very unstable. Loved the computer rcs, watching the joysticks rotating the craft. Awesome
@@skater4life2360 It would be a pretty big mistake on NASA's part to leave out such a detail if they wanted to convince people it is real. Maybe it is because the re-entry happened over a vast expanse of desolate ocean. Were you expecting to see your house from there?
There's Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow, starboard bow; There's Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow, Jim. ruclips.net/video/FCARADb9asE/видео.html
That was absolutely mesmerizing! Very awesome video. Something that would have made it even better would be to super-impose some telemetry in the corner. It would have been awesome to see Altitude, Velocity and G-forces in real time.
I'd love to feel it. The ultimate thrill ride. And when they come back from the moon it's going to be way more than just orbital velocity... they'll be returning from lunar orbit without slowing down for Earth orbital entry. Apollo returned at 24,000mph. Re-entry is such a crazy situation.
Ya, with telemetry we could imagine what it would feel like. :) But I thought that this was re-entry from Artemis. Didn't it fly around the moon and then return? That's why it had to do the double re-entry.@@mycroft16
0:31 what is the object in the bottom left corner of the screen moving from center shot to left side of screen that appears to change direction while maintaining constant (appeared constant) speed about the same time there is a noise? If that is a small asteroid what would cause such a sudden direction change? If that is a satellite then why isn't there some sort of booster or discharge to change direction?
Its background is space.. it first appears in the left 1/4 of the screen. It moves up to the left then hard turns 45 degrees to the left. I tried to spot it with my phone screen but it was difficult. The computer screen worked better.
I cant see what you are talking about but the noise is the RCS (Reaction Control System) firing to change the direction of the craft. The object you saw could have just been the plume of the RCS.
It's cool how it swirls and gets disrupted by the thrusters. And then it starts to look like the ship is being attacked by infernal demons. Gotta be a pucker up moment for astronauts no matter what.
Amazing, I loved this, it's crazy how accurate we have to be for re-entry! Also take a second to imagine that this could have been a landing on a similar earth like planet, gave me an eery feeling thinking of that, awesome!
And the aliens are going to get one look at whomever lands, pull out their own weaponry & just like that...colonization dreams shattered. They'll follow up with a quick touchdown on Earth and we'll have to pay respects in the chat to all those adventurous "explorers". God forbid if they already have monitored some of the history here.
The capsules center of air pressure and center of mass are offset. The capsule steers its way through the atmosphere by rotating thus changing the direction of lift. Apollo spacecraft returned to earth the same way. What a perfect way to see the steering mechanism in action. Thanks for the video.
this was the one remaining HD uncut footage for me to witness in regard to entry/re-entry, in full glory! wow! JUST WOW! made my year! Many thanks to all those involved, those putting in all the effort and hard work, we truly appreciate your contributions to further evolution of mankind.
Wow I don’t think I’ve ever seen a full uncut video of re entry. That was amazing thank you for the video!
Glad you enjoyed it!
I agree with you. I never had either.
That was very cool. I assume the constant squidgy noises were the attitude thrusters and their valves. If felt like I was fhere. SciFi movies should use this soundtrack. Thanks for posting. 👍
Outstanding👍🏼🇺🇸👍🏼
@@RetroJackmost flat Earthers are bubble biters 😳🙊😳
It's one thing for the fantastic picture quality on this, it's another for the fact *it has sound!*. Getting the sounds of the experience as part of the visuals just makes all the difference, gives it that extra presence.
Guess we know why flying saucers make all those whacky noises in the movies haha, literally what we heard the entire first few minutes, neatt
Yeah, but why the added soundtrack in the background before it hit the atmosphere? That wasn't machinery sounds...
The vfx artists seem to have forgotten to add all of the giant land masses of the earth
WHAT DID YOU WANT TO SAY? ЧЕГО ХОТЕЛ СКАЗАТЬ-ТО?
@@kob8634 you're delusional.
That was so cool!! RCS firing, initial atmospheric entry, then re-entry, aerodynamic braking, then drogues and brilliant beautiful main chutes. What a ride!
Wow-awesome! As a child of the 60s who watched all the Apollo re-entries, I’ve never seen it this way. What a treat! Really expected more plasma upon reentry. Amazingly quiet ride until it hit the atmosphere. Hearing RCS at work was interesting too. This is the closest I will ever get to experiencing re-entry. Thanks for the video.
Seemed like an awful lot of RCS work on initial entry profile. Maybe that’s expected but to me it looked like constant overcorrecting at some points
@@joefunk1611 Not an awful lot. It's indeed expected. Orion here is performing a "skip reentry" which is the very first time a human rated capsule has done this. In the past engineers couldn't really figure out a way to confidently pull it off, but technology has improved and this can be done now automatically without a crew as Orion here demonstrated. Imagine a stone being skipped on a puddle of water, well something similar is happening here. The exact burns have to be very precise and the RCS must be able to quickly adjust the orientation of the heatshield.
For Apollo, the capsule would land several miles/km from their expected landing zones, which made recovery operations very difficult and they risked landing in an unsafe zone. The skip maneuver gives Orion much more control on where to land. This skip maneuver also eases reentry g-forces which should make the descent more comfortable for the astronauts.
@@jrc1606 thanks very much. Great explanation and now it makes sense. Gives a lot more confidence as I always thought the capsules shape was itself ‘self corrective’ but what you said really give some understanding and confidence I wasn’t feeling until now :).
@@jrc1606I thought it looked like 2 separate entries! Thanks for the explanation
The plasma firing up is just amazing. This is what protects us from space rocks...at least from the medium to small ones.
To hear the thrusters working is something else. Sounds like something is smacking the side of the capsule, but thats the attitude adjustment thrusters, and I never knew how much adjustment was needed during reentry and how it’s automated now, gives new respect to how they did it in the early days of space travel without the complex computer navigation systems we have today.
right!
And still the human brain is the most complex super computer.
they had computer navigation systems, infact they were invented for space travel
@@moe42oi prefer to be called a meat bag
@@BeansEnjoyer911 sounds like you need an attitude adjustment.
Can't believe its taken this long for a full re-entry video uncut from orbit to ocean being uploaded to youtube. You normally always see videos that get cut away to animations or ground camera footage halfway trough. And the raw audio instead of some generic spacy discovery channel music was really cool too.
No Fr. I wonder how much it costs to add recording footage. I just can’t imagine it being too much in this day and age. I’m surprised every unit wasn’t equipped all around with recording devices
Muchos intereses políticos y militares como para revelar algo así en otros momentos
1:04 The Earth is pear shaped 😂
@@jesus4400It's almost as though curved windows can cause optical distortion.
Yes but why is the video quality still so poor? It doesn't make any sense to me
The idea of Artemis skipping like stone on and off our atmosphere is wild. It looked very controlled despite the hyper sonic speeds.
Exceedingly controlled, wait til the next version, can't wait to see what they come out with my gosh was that cool
skipping like a stone. because the earth is flat, like a pond.
Just leaving this here for the replies to bloke above this commnet.
@@_Rustodian Flat- like the mush where his cerebral cortex should be.
that is exactly what the gemini capsules would do during the apollo missions in the early 60's, nothing new
Thank you for not marring this incredible video with a music overlay or commentary. Absolutely astounding.
I had no idea _that_ many angle adjustments were necessary during re-entry. Both the accuracy and the heat-resistance is impressive.
They aren't necessary. They didn't do it in the 60's or 70's. It was purely a ballistic fall. They are overcomplicating this.
@@JohnHansknechtArtemis' re-entry was done exactly like it needed to be, just like during Apollo. The Apollo CM did not use a ballistic entry approach because it would have burned up in re-entry. NASA opted for a non-ballistic re-entry approach by skipping off the Earth's atmosphere once to dissipate the CM's re-entry velocity and lower the heating loads to the shielding. Artemis is still using the same re-entry technique and they have to. The Space Shuttle re-entered the atmosphere from LEO at Mach 25. Artemis' re-entry speed was Mach 32. This maneuver was very necessary.
@@crucial0072thank you so much for this comment!
its fake and done by ai. notice how they added aurora effects and exaggerated lens flare
@@BxBxProductions please stop. You're made by AI. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
This has got to be the coolest video I've ever seen. From the views of the Earth, the way the thrusters cut in and out (I didn't think they'd behave like that) to watching the plasma stream from breaking through the atmosphere. This is hands down some of the coolest footage ever recorded.
You sir are an NPC
@@itsresouling4117Baselessly repeating commonly used phrases verbatim is pretty npc if you ask me.
@@itsresouling4117 Yeah, what the guy above me said.
The irony...
What's ironic is that the coolest footage outside of the planet is funded by the biggest d bag ON the planet
@@アイスクリーム-u8s Things you can do with a can-do attitude? Just look at little Orion here and what _it_ could do. Don't sell yourself short! 🤩
I’m not sure most people understand how fast this thing is going. Watching the swaths of ocean and cloud formations moving so fast is insane. Great video!
26500 km/h
@@zelenavyplesyze8333 its re-entering from the moon, it's actually 25000 mph or 40,000 km/ h
Oh I get it and it’s WILD, nerves of steel!!
And where is the land? Any land? If it's going so insanely fast we should be seeing lots of land..
@@snakeeyes3733not necessarily, most of the world is water. And this was a pretty short clip and the craft reentered over the ocean on purpose to make a water landing.
Thank you for the upload.
No music, computer generated animations, or cut video. Awesome!
Lol no cga...are you blind? The whole blue marble is one. 😂
@@Futurecop23 flat earth people be like
@@Futurecop23”it… it… it is photoshopped…. But it has to be”….
@@Futurecop23 You're new to the planet? Since 1990s or so?
I’m 68 years old, so I remember John Glenn orbiting the earth 3 times. Which captured my imagination as a young boy and after watching this incredible video, it made me a little sad, knowing that I was born in a generation that will never experience space travel as a tourist.
@charlesx593 many things will happen before you're 100!
You should be an astronaut in the next life
If it makes you feel any better, I'm 23, but I'm also sad that I'm guaranteed to never ever be able to travel through the galaxy at the speed of light but some lucky generation thousands of years in the future will have that privilege and probably be able to see intergalactic planets and solar systems and even meet aliens. It's not fair to be born into such a vast universe and not be able to see even the smallest percentage of it.
world is in decline, we will be back in the stone age soon.
Indoctrination is real and it's affected you for 68 years wake up now before your reincarnated back here
Lunar return velocity, purposefully skipping the craft off the atmosphere to attain a more controlled final descent... The final attitude change into a more vertical orientation brought with it such a wild rush of "here we go," and went we did. Like others have said, a velocity/telemetry display would be quite an addition, but like subtitles in a movie, it would have taken me out of the moment of just experiencing what happened there. Truly magnificent.
Well said
Awesum! Thank you! I'm 71 and have been watching space flights all my life. But this is a 1st time Marvin the Martian internal view of re-entry and landing. Well done. Looking forward to more!
most of your life but not all of it if you are 71
@@wirebeam I'm also 71, we would've been in 4th or fifth grade, so yeah it would've been pretty much our whole lives. This was back when space flight was new and novel. Unless you lived it back then, you can't understand the excitement each mission provided our young minds.
Same here, except I turn 72 tomorrow.
@@bobbyd6680Happy birthday sir!
@@bobbyd6680 happy birthday!
I never realized the heat friction started so high in the atmosphere.
Particles of the atmosphere reach the moon
@@LogicCaster more like sparse molecules.
@@zabijca
Particle; A minute portion of matter.
Molecules would fall under that category.
And the sparsity is self evident.
*compression not friction, a common mistake, but an understandable one ;)
@@LogicCastersee every time I see a science related video it’s just two people like yourselves both asserting that you’re correct. Who am I supposed to listen to? Neither of you. You did nothing but cancel each other out. It’s Almost as if you never commented at all
Amazing. Not how I pictured the thrusters functioning at all. Congrats to all the hard working engineers and technicians who made that possible. The sounds in real time were enlightening
Its fascinating. Those sounds are from the solenoids opening and closing letting the propellant flow for a fraction of a second
@@gordon1201 I'm curious if the thrusters only fire for a set period of time and the computer keeps repeatedly firing them until it's in the right position. Or if the thrusters keep firing continuously without shutting off until it's in the right position. Does that make sense?
@@LSD123. the word you are looking for is pulse, short and long, they do not stay open. multiple short bursts are easier to control.
Are they thrusters or deflection style panels for adjustable direction and speed decrease ? That's what I assumed for whatever reason by the sounds lol
Yeah it takes a lot of accurate adjustments to get the proper speed and angles necessary for a safe reentry.
I think this video is a true first for nearly EVERYONE (except the Astronauts). I have scoured the internet my whole life and have never found any full re-entry footage, let alone in HD... Normally it's SD shuttle videos. This was incredible to watch!!!!!!!
Where would this channel get this video if NASA never released it? I guess it was already out there somewhere?
@@SamBorgman EDIT: Sorry my first sentence sounds very aggressive. I didn't intend it to be.
Did I say anything about OP specifically being the one to record and release this? No. But the fact remains it's on their channel first. Obviously this footage was shot with NASA's hardware and control.
@@madezra64 heh instant internet rage, nice. You could have edited the comment itself lol. I was saying if you have searched for video like this you've probably missed it since this channel could only get this from somewhere on the internet.
There might be newer clearer better videos of re-entry out there too.
@@SamBorgman I did in like the first 3 seconds lol
Same
What an awesome video, uncut, no comentary, no interfference, raw ambient sound!!. Wish there was a similar one from the shuttle era!!
and no continents either!
There was , it was from inside Columbia…..
@@skater4life2360weird how there's no continents in the middle of the Pacific ocean
@@skater4life2360
The brightness and lack of contrast hinders finer details.
Everybody knows the continents are on the flat side dummy
The extreme amount of calculation needed to make this spacecraft not bounce off the atmosphere and be lost in space forever is insane.. you can see just how much effort it takes with all those extremely small adjustments it makes… god i love physics
First time I've seen a full video of any #NASA use of #Skip #Re-Entry Too! It's a shame they waited over a year to release it publicly. Suggested to #NASA they rename the whole #Artimis SlS programme with #Arthritis lol They were not amused 😂
cg you mean
@@luis-sophus-8227 ??? Cg??
@@luis-sophus-8227 Your brain is computer generated.... by a fucking fish
@@luis-sophus-8227 "I'm too lazy/stupid to try and understand complicated concepts so everyone who actually knows what they're talking about must be wrong." Yeah, it's everyone else. Not you.
Thank you for showing me what its like to slow down from orbital velocity all the way to splashdown. I waited all my life to witness that. Great video!
In this case, Orion slowed down from escape velocity, not orbital velocity. It was necessary to skip off the atmosphere, entering more than once.
same!
@@cyberia55 Thanks for clarifying that mute point for me.
@@davidlittlefield2483 Mute?
@@davidlittlefield2483 Which point was “mute”? 🤷🏻♂️
The speed the clouds are moving below was incredible
Re-entry velocity was 24,581mph or 36,052ft per second
(39,559km/h)
I thought it was 17,500 mph lower orbit, unless it was at a higher orbit...
10555 m/s (for Kerbal players)
It was so fast that first it needs atmospheric braking to reduce the apoapsis, bounced off, and then re enter again
yup 17,500 from low earth orbit, 25,000+ mph coming home from the moon, much further to fall down....@@beni_maru01
Ah maan.. now I can't stop seeing it like that
Incredible stuff. Really makes you think just how close these capsules and other crafts and their occupants are to being completely annihilated every time they come home. The fact that we can send things and people into space and bring them home safely is amazing. There really is no margin for error when it comes to re-entry. I hope we will see more views like this in the future.
yeah, and the nasa vfx department forgot to add in the continents
@@skater4life2360all the information of the internet at your disposal and you chose to stay utterly ignorant 😅
@@ROVA00 Did you notice the lack of land masses?
@@skater4life2360 …you mean while it was flying over the Indian Ocean, north of Australia and over the Pacific Ocean until splashdown on the Pacific Ocean?
I guess it’s easier to just say whatever nonsense comes to mind than to actually understand what’s going on, huh? It’s always the most ignorant people with the strongest opinions lol Why think about it when you can just say it’s nothing but VFX lol
@@skater4life2360The capsule was very close to earth, so it’s probably that the land masses were just out of view. And if NASA was just faking this (which they are not) I don’t think that not adding continents to the model would pass the editing team that easily.
Holy crap the capsule just bounced off of the atmosphere, and then reentered again! That was freaking amazing.
Absolutely Amazing!!!! and thanks for leaving the raw sound in and no music or voice over!!!!😁👍
As a Star Trek and Star Wars fan and as someone who regularly fantasizes about space travel, and as someone who has played countless space simulators... I declare this to be the best video ever uploaded to RUclips... and the most proper use of the platform... ever.
I agree, best simulation ever! Looks so real!
@@kwimms great comment... nice to read one with some actual common sense. the rest of these brainless mainstream media fed sheeple would still believe this was real even if the captions read, "simulation"
Dodging satelites with ease !
Amazing
@@kwimms😂😂😂😂
@@kwimmsthat was great joke
Flat earthers on their way to try explain this
*Kyrie Irving has entered the chat*
@@LevelEarth2021 Moon only has different shape phases because the earth is a sphere.
Moon is upside down in southern hemisphere vs the northern hemisphere.
Planes have to adjust their flight path angle otherwise they would technically end up flying straight into space.
These things are only possible on a spherical planet.
Shush 🤡
Yeah it's called CGI... Just like everything these satanic scum show about Space
The left side of the Earth was flat for the first 4 minutes lmao
@@HappyGothGalthe earth is not a perfect sphere
And that is as close as I ever need to get to that experience, thanks.
Shuttle was a nice clean cabin and a nice clean runway. This is back to fumes from heat shield and bobbing around in the ocean with your barf bag.
This is the first time I hear valves actuating the RCS. It sounds so cool!
It surprised me that they're in use right up to chute deployment.
@@Vector_Ze I have a feeling that might be some kind of purge, just to expend the fuel before it hits the water. I could be wrong though, it just seemed logical.
Pk la terre paré courber ? C'est du a la vitesse ? Un effet de vision réel ou de caméra une idée ?
@@Shano18-31 I believe it's an effect of the curved glass of the window distorting the view of the earth at a particular part of the window.
I love how this really gives the feel of you moving faster than the earth and you are "slowly" letting it catch up to you.
I actually had no idea that's how far/high up that it starts to burn up. Really cool.
Simply wonderful! This is what the Apollo crews saw during reenty and splashdown☺
crazy how this is in real-time. Those thrusters are insanely fast
Live I think you mean. That real time is just American bullshit!
One minute you’re watching the earth from space through that window as superheated plasma begins to rip by, to 25 minutes later when you see liquid water wash across the same window at splash-down! Amazing footage and so cool to keep the original audio.
did you see one continent or land mass?
@@skater4life2360…because they over the ocean. Do know how large the ocean
@@Jelly_Juice2006 pacific is around 9500 miles wide... the craft would be traveling at over 18,000 mph before entering atmos. it would cross the pacific in less than 30 min at that speed. I would expect to see land
@@skater4life2360you're not much of a thinker are you buddy.ill put this simple for you and then you can go and watch any of the countless videos of the science varies who will tell you why that happened as quite frankly I can't be bothered. Just because you didn't see something doesn't mean it isn't there,if you watch a video of say the iss streams it takes a decent amount of time between continents something that is orbiting the earth and not descending into it therefore the artemis is descending and not so much orbiting around the earth at a speed like the iss which as I said is moving across the earth essentially.i can't be bothered to go in depth because you're clearly very dull and wouldn't get it so I'll leave it there 😢
@@UltraLightVideos. insults aside, I comprehend drag from the atmos. I'd expect to see the eastern side of asia in the beginning of the video.
Love the thruster firing sound.
And visually, the effects the RCS thrusters have on the plasma sheath is amazing. Love the bits of heat shield char sitting on the window.
Only thing better to see that this would be a time lapse from an on orbit position, or even just real time.
And you can tell it never fully left atmosphere on its skip maneuver.
Orion never enters low earth orbit after returning from lunar orbit. That’d require as much energy as the TLI in the first place, and is why the reentry speed is so insanely high.
I was wondering what was building up in the window, I thought it could be loose debris inside the capsule. Hard to imagine fragments of the heat shield laying on the outside of the window in such an extreme environment
@@braindare1351 interestingly, one of the reasons for Artemis 2 just having been postponed, is “unexpected erosion” of the ablative heat shield. Whether or not the debris seen on the window is a representation of that, I don’t know.
@@ArKritz84 excellent observation. Just my opinion but the failures of NASA go far deeper than a few technical issues that would have been solved in months during the space race. I Don'🤞t know what is more difficult these days , technical issues or bureaucratic ones
@@braindare1351 changing political priorities is definitely hamstringing long-term programs the most. And crewed deep-space missions are definitely long-term in their development. This leads to budget limitations, which leads to technical issues. That said, I'm not sold on the idea that crewed deep space missions should be pursued at all. The juice doesn't seem to be worth the squeeze.
Absolutely stunning footage, and a testament to the camera technology that allows it.
Another great moment for NASA.
Whenever I see videos looking at earth from space, I love trying to think about what I was actually doing where I live on that day. Seeing this perspective, knowing that while this was happening I was at work and going through my daily life. It's just a cool little thought I like to have once in a while.
That’s cute :))
I have this thought too but I first remember having it with movies or TV shows. I'd be thinking "I wonder what I was doing at the exact moment this scene was being shot" lol.
Очень атмосферное видео , и шум клапанов двигателей ориентации, и искры отлетающих частиц термоэкрана. И плазма танцующая в вихре. И брызги океана на иллюминаторе..... Как будто сам из космоса вернулся )))
отсыпь
С возвращением.
Спасибо вам за разъяснение. Мне было интересно, каковы были некоторые эффекты.
Про отскок от атмосферы чего не упомянул? С первого раза не получилось приземлиться ..
"orientation engiens" I believe you mean vectoring thrusters 🤓
man it's insane to have a backview while skipping of the atmosphere. Truly awesome content
If only because the front view would melt.
Insane to think of how fast it must be going if you can see the earth moving that quickly underneath it
Wow, that is literally out of this world. The knocking noises. It's probably one of the best videos on RUclips.
The knocking noises are the ReactionControlSystem(Thrusters) turning on and off I think
That was awesome. The sounds of the thrusters are surprisingly quiet and simple. The entire process was much quieter and calmer than expected.
That's because there is little to no sound outside the atmosphere, and inside the outer atmosphere it's very quiet. So you're only hearing the sounds coming from inside the craft
That is not "thusters" that you're seeing that is the friction on the space shuttle moving into the atmosphere.
@@trxtech3010 The sudden sounds are the thrusters adjusting the angle of the craft. He is not talking about the flames.
@@a_kazakis the thrusters firing off sounded like an electro magnetic switch popping back and forth.
@@moosman4217
Not entirely. Sounds also travels via conduction. So the outside sound of the craft conducted through the structure and into the camera mic.
Incredible piece of footage. Just shows what an incredibly technical procedure it is to get a spacecraft back to Earth safely.
22:55
Why do the control jets fire again even though the 3 main parachutes have already opened?
Possibly to get rid of the last remaining propellant. The thrusters use hypergolic fuel, that is some nasty stuff. The capsule makes sure to dump it all out to make aproaching the capsule safer.
@@man-from-2058thx
I've always wanted to watch a video of a complete re-entry to get a sense of what it's like. Thanks
I am 70 now. I watched the Apollo 11 moon mission on TV broadcast from start to finish. But we never saw any video of the interior during landing return to earth. So this must be the same experience the astronauts had. Thank you for this.
Why doesn't anyone post more videos like this? That was neat!
There hasn't been lately a lot of deep space missions that return to Earth.
At 22:54 there is what sounds like lots of RCS firing. Do they use RCS at this point to slow the descent more than what the parachutes can do? Or possibly also done to get rid of most of the remaining hypergolic fuel and oxidizer? Anybody out there know?
It's to keep it stable and on-target. It cancels out any rotation.
It's pretty funny that in hollywood re entries are always depicted like your spacecraft is a fuel truck exploding into a violent and chaotic trail of thick flames like it's burning while in reality the plasma is more similar to your thin cooking gas stove flame but stretched into a long trail but it remains translucent enough you still can see in details earth's curve and cloud formations.
In movies it's like somebody threw a molotov cocktail on the craft and let it burn😂
in the movies is where you have thunderous fireball explosions in the vacuum of space by battles of militaries from various star systems. And they all have spacecraft of superluminal flight with precision accuracy of darting across the galaxy with no abberation of the space-time continuum (or g-forces) with insane amounts of power, along with directed energy weapons. And when they engage in battles they do it just like 18th century navies.
@@wrightmfWell I wasn't thinking about those. More like movies depicting real space historical events like The Right Stuff (1983) Apollo 13 (1995) Gagarin First In Space (2013) or Salyut 7 (2017) to name a few.
In each of these movies it always has to look chaotic out of control like it's a fuel tank bursting into flames.
The early ones were ballistic, so much more rough on the astronauts…more violent. Shuttle should have been a lot like this, using skip method
Incredible. Never seen reentry with this high quality and wide angle. Absolutely insane.
"High quality"?
Super high quality 😂😂😂
I hate that they hide so many space footage from us , even of strange things they see out there. I hate this human civilization. Earth needs to blow up already haha
@@samuelponce1 Subanimals are not invited.
flat earthers punching air rn
Just because you see something on a "screen" doesn't make it real. I saw Bruce Willis land on an asteroid and blow it up to save the world. Looked pretty real to me. Just sayin'
@@IdahoPohTaToh yeah especially when you know nothing about vfx lmao, nice try ig
@IdahoPohTaToh
So something's fake if you're not personally there to witness it?
I've never seen australia, so it must be fake, right?
You would've at least expected the CGI folks to make the earth consistently round.. Shoddy work even for NASA.. ;) Throw in a few stars in the darkness of space... Get a better looking sun..
@@carcinogen60yearsago I know people who have visited it.. or did they really? 🤔
That might’ve been the gnarliest video I’ve ever watched
The sounds the thrusters make are amazing! This video is incredible. THANK YOU!
the missing land masses were cool too
@@skater4life2360What exactly do you get out of ignoring what is so obvious? Nobody has any reason to lie. We’ve spent centuries figuring out how to get to space so there’s no reason why the technology isn’t there. Why is this so hard to believe for you? It’s a basic principle. Fireworks can go up so what makes you think we can’t make a gigantic one and shoot it out of our planet?
@skater4life2360 You missing brain cells is cool too.
@@Hangry_Hungarian insults aside, the freemasons and satanista at nasa did a bang on job!
@@BuddySpike101 with current materials science and computer technology, we should have "moon bases" by now. I don't think they can get past the firmament
Cany anyone way smater than me explain the weird thumping/clicking around 5:32?
I am guessing thrusters keeping it on course?
Im a flat earther but thats a valve turning on and off to let the fuel through to the burner
thought something like that, thanks@@effigy42
How can you see this and still think it's flat though man?@@effigy42
@@effigy42 It doesn't really have any thing to do with being a flat earther you know.
i absolutely love how Earth looks from up there, especially the atmosphere colours and all the clouds covering those beautiful blue oceans. i'm glad we reached the point where this kind of thing can be done by humans and most importantly, the footage is acccessible to all of us. thank you!
edit: a compliment in our achievements leads to comments disaster. AVOID.
What is this cult use of the term "humans"? What's wrong with saying "people"?
@@WSCLATER the dictionary defines humans as people, and people as humans. Theyre quite interchangable
No cult. I see nothing wrong with calling ourselves humans. Isn't that what we are?@@WSCLATER
All except flat-earthers.
lol wtf - people and humans are two different meanings. Also, why does it matter?!@@WSCLATER
What is the clicking noise along with the sudden changes in the view through the window, of what’s happening outside the Orion, when breaking through the atmosphere?
The air friction at 4:49 reminds me of what i visually represented a wormhole as when i was younger, going that speed must be absolutely insane!
Cgi
@@bakedbeans3181Your brain has the consistency of baked beans.
@@Armageddon325 😴🤡 sleepy clown
@@bakedbeans3181you must have a sad life
@@Tittin414 way better than yours, I know reality, u do not
17:12 -> The shade of the thrusters!
The sound of the 24 RCS thrusters are incredible! Do you think NASA will release the onboard footage of the launch? Incredible.
At launch, the abort tower covers the windows.
@@psycotria Not the entire launch
Yep. Before the tower goes, the only thing to see would be the clouds and sky. It would be a real kick in the a$$ to take that ride!@@ArraxShadowfang
I don't think there'd be a lot to see. Here we actually are hearing and seeing all the microsecond RCS adjustments to keep the capsule in the optimum re-entry orientation.
@@psycotriadoes the abort tower extend to space?
Those tiny thrusters to orient the craft are so satisfying to listen to. Very crisp.
Thank you for the most amazing view of a reentry. I've watched many a launch and recovery, but never one so unique as this.
Incredible footage and thank you for not putting a music track over the top - the sounds were as brilliant as the images.
Space sounds are eerie and cool at the same time! 😁
The humming sound in the background reminds me of the background noise from Ao Oni 😂
There is no sound in space.
@@k.c.r.5974thanks professor
@@k.c.r.5974Technically, there is, it just can't travel because of the vacuum
@@Thomas_Everman sound must travel in order to be heard
Is this window in front or behind shot of bein in motion? Adjusters adjusting what? Then if its automated now how did Apollo 11 and 12 do there reentry?
Apollo also had computer-controlled reentry, although there was a provision for the astronauts to take over in the event of a computer failure.
That eerie science fiction sounds is what makes it epic to me
😂
🤦♂️😆
Ain't fiction no more brotha
wow, you'd really expect the thrusters to sound like movies portray them, but honestly i love the real sounds more. like its literally just "THOMP-THOMP. THOMP. THOMP-THOMP" and it really gives you a feel of just how precise and accurate those little bursts have to be in order to stop sheer calamity from occurring
3:50 Re-entry begins
19:40 Drogue chutes deploy. ~80k feet.
21:00 Main chutes deploy. ~20k feet
So many amazing things in this spectacular video. The double entry, the plasma, the RCS firing, the deposition of combustion products on the window, the deployment of the drogue and main chutes, and the landing in the water -- just amazing. Also, the perspective, looking backwards, is not something you often see. I just wish there was a telemetry overlay!
Cgi
@@bakedbeans3181 Zero content troll!
@@Raptorman0909 🤭😆 this is the most fake comment section ever! The numbers of views n comments vs. the actual people, lmao pathetic, fake raptor girl
@@Raptorman0909 99 vrill.🤡
The abruptness of the dive and the amount of control input available are really wild!
I feel like I’m watching unreleased footage of 2001 A Space Odyssey.
The sound, the still image, the tension, the spectacle of it all.
Eerie.
So true. I had not thought of that
All CGI same thing
@@bakedbeans3181
1. There was no CGI in 2001.
2. Prove this is CGI without just saying its CGI.
I half expected HAL to tell me" I'm sorry Dave, but can't I do that." Lol
I'm sorry Dave, I can't let you film that.
If the microphone is inside the cabin i am amazed how quiet that whole process is, the thrusters banging is unsettling.
This was so great, thank you Zach. I recall NASA reporting that this was a "Skip Re-entry" manoeuvre. It was so cool to see it all happen from beginning to end. 😁
Glad you enjoyed it! Amazing to "go for the ride" and really understand what Orion went through!
Oh ok, I was going to ask why it looked like it went through 2 reentry's, I always thought it got hot one time and I saw 2 times!!!!
Thanks for confirming :)
I do this often in Kerbal :D
@@TheLaunchPadjust like the Apollo era
Yeah, the skip was fascinating. Heck, the whole thing was mesmerising.
the design of those parachutes is so brilliant, the way they slowly unfurl reliably.
great sound track in this video as well, really outer spacy
I think it’s called “reefing”. There’s a super interesting history learning of how much of an actual engineering problem figuring out how to reliably get it to work truly was. And that was in the early days of skydiving & ejection seat development. X 1000 for operations such as re-entry on top of that.
Did not one ‘chute fail the first time?
@@nels9382 No idea honestly.
@@nels9382The initial ones were drogue chutes.
Just had a bad day at work and this video has made me cheer up , it is so beautiful !
Sorry had bad day at work but glad found this video and brought some Joy. Space is amazing place and so is our beautiful planet
this was absolutely amazing. I thought airplane noises during turbulence was bad but those sounds in the capsule would have had me praying so hard lol
That was awesome, and thoroughly fascinating to watch!
Would be really cool to have a version with some commentary or pop-ups explaining what's happening. Maybe even a telemetry overlay showing relative speed, altitude, position, etc.
I mean it's reentring the atmosphere nothing much going on there.
@@eckee angle relative to the surface, velocity, acceleration (or rather, deceleration), altitude, perhaps a model of the surface showing where it is relative to the surface, stages in the program, what thrusters are firing and why, I can think of a lot of things that are going on. It looks like there was a "bounce" over the atmosphere where it grazed by and took a lot of speed off, before bouncing back off the atmosphere for a second entry later, and it looked like it was turning over to balance the load on the heat shields like you'd turn over a burger on a grill. this was way more than just flying the thing into the atmosphere, would be super cool to see how the computer was interpreting what was happening and when it decided it was time to turn over, deploy different parachutes, etc.
@@almicc yea. I'd love to have a full debrief too but even the illustrations made by NASA itself shows incorrect flight trajectory, especially the reentry.
There are so many exiting things and so many details about spaceflight yet NASA treats their audience like dumb kids
It’s amazing that there are humans who have built a machine which can travel to the moon and back, and then it can land on a dime, yet there are other humans who still swear that the Earth is flat.
Brilliant. Thank you for sharing this with us
No problem 👍
It's incredible how it travels two or three countries in a matter of seconds! And the sound emitted by the trajectory correction is quite fascinating too.
That was all I was expecting it to be, and more! (That window definitely needs a splash of Windex, though)
same!
Looks like it got scorched by the reentry plasma and became cloudy. It's a lot clearer at the start of the video.
This is crazy imagine being there with bits flying off the craft all over the place you've got to have big balls to be an astronaut. Amazing video thank you
The sounds are especially unsettling.
There was no one in this vehicle. Do a little research before commenting.
@@Ih8liarsandusers The keyword is "imagine". He's saying imagine being in there and seeing bits flying off (which is normal). The astronauts he's referring to is just a general statement. Nowhere did he say that there were astronauts in this vehicle. Learn to comprehend what you read before commenting.
Just enough testicular fortitude to become a big fat liar. It pays good.
@@Ih8liarsandusersit’s almost as if he didn’t say “imagine”
FPV plasma trail is always gorgeous. Especially love seeing the thruster wake
and the missing continents!
@@skater4life2360 Yes, you are right. Most of the earths surface is covered with water. Isn't that strange?
@@inex1smsat wouldn't eastern asia be visible in the beginning of the video?
@@skater4life2360 Why? Below the clouds? You have to take in perspective, that the curvature we are seeing isn't that strong in reality because it is a wide angle camera. So the area we see is not as big as you think.
@@inex1smsat who really even knows
Ahhh, the serenity after the mains deploy! The nail-biting after watching globs of molten heat-shield sticking to the window is over!
I can't imagine how complex the control system is for those thrusters :o
Awesome! It looks like the ship re-enters atmosphere 2 times, the first to lose some speed and next to fall to the earth. It should be interesting if there is a telemetry with altitude and speed data shown in real time
its did, it bounced on the atmosphere to target its landing site.
Someone needs to do an overlay on this with MPH and tracectory info please.. cool video.
It’s crazy how the earth is spinning so fast it looks like it’s staying still
I would not even use the term "spinning" for a slowly rotating ball that needs 24 hours for one single revolution. And I don't in what way you expect to see it hear. So many people just have no idea that speed is always relative.
@@sebastiannolte1201 “the experts” say it’s spinning 1000 mph. Not me
@@sebastiannolte1201no it's not relative. That's a nonsense term came up with liars to avoid the fact we are not moving. No proof we are spinning. All the proof says the exact opposite.
Like stars. And the Sun that move over us.
Loved this, the stability at super speed grazing the atmosphere, burning off speed, bouncing off the air, amnd the second contact at much slower was very unstable. Loved the computer rcs, watching the joysticks rotating the craft. Awesome
also the missing continents was a nice tough from the nasa vfx department
@@skater4life2360 🙄
@@Axl_Pose did you notice it?
@@skater4life2360 It would be a pretty big mistake on NASA's part to leave out such a detail if they wanted to convince people it is real. Maybe it is because the re-entry happened over a vast expanse of desolate ocean. Were you expecting to see your house from there?
@@Axl_Pose at 100 miles up, I would expect to see the eastern side of asia in the beginning of the video
I waited 50 years for this , wow . I didn’t stop smiling . It’s very cool , thanks ❤️🇦🇺
Its amazing at 4:05 you can see the moments it first encouters the edge of the atmosphere.
4:39 STOP TAKING MY SOUL
There's Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow, starboard bow;
There's Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow, Jim.
ruclips.net/video/FCARADb9asE/видео.html
I play KSP VR and its cool seeing the chutes deploy much like they do in the game.
Hold on what, VR?
@@wellonsshawn Yep! ruclips.net/video/iRBAXRv4xvM/видео.html
That's the roundest flat earth I've ever seen from space. Simply amazing footage.
There's no reasoning with a moron. they'll just claim a fisheye lens was used. If they don't first claim this video is CGI.
its all cgi and fisheye lenses
@@rooboy69 Must suck to be you
@@rooboy69
Keep telling yourself that.
@@rooboy69 surrrre 😂
That was absolutely mesmerizing! Very awesome video. Something that would have made it even better would be to super-impose some telemetry in the corner. It would have been awesome to see Altitude, Velocity and G-forces in real time.
I'd love to feel it. The ultimate thrill ride. And when they come back from the moon it's going to be way more than just orbital velocity... they'll be returning from lunar orbit without slowing down for Earth orbital entry. Apollo returned at 24,000mph. Re-entry is such a crazy situation.
Telemetry would be an awesome add.
Ya, with telemetry we could imagine what it would feel like. :) But I thought that this was re-entry from Artemis. Didn't it fly around the moon and then return? That's why it had to do the double re-entry.@@mycroft16
I agree, linear velocity and altitude ASL would have been a cool addition , especially during the first skip.
@@mycroft16 But this came from the moon... hence the first braking phase.
0:31 what is the object in the bottom left corner of the screen moving from center shot to left side of screen that appears to change direction while maintaining constant (appeared constant) speed about the same time there is a noise? If that is a small asteroid what would cause such a sudden direction change? If that is a satellite then why isn't there some sort of booster or discharge to change direction?
Its background is space.. it first appears in the left 1/4 of the screen. It moves up to the left then hard turns 45 degrees to the left. I tried to spot it with my phone screen but it was difficult. The computer screen worked better.
I cant see what you are talking about but the noise is the RCS (Reaction Control System) firing to change the direction of the craft. The object you saw could have just been the plume of the RCS.
I really loved watching the plasma develop behind the ship and dissipate as it slows. Feel the tension man! What a ride!
It's cool how it swirls and gets disrupted by the thrusters. And then it starts to look like the ship is being attacked by infernal demons. Gotta be a pucker up moment for astronauts no matter what.
@@BlueZirnitra The first time we got an impression of the speed...
Now that we have satellite footage of this planet , I can’t wait until we manage to travel to earth and uncover its wonders.
do you ever wonder what food Aliens would consider as generic "Human Food"?
Amazing, I loved this, it's crazy how accurate we have to be for re-entry! Also take a second to imagine that this could have been a landing on a similar earth like planet, gave me an eery feeling thinking of that, awesome!
Lol. It's never going to happen.
@@killwalkerIts bound to happen
And the aliens are going to get one look at whomever lands, pull out their own weaponry & just like that...colonization dreams shattered.
They'll follow up with a quick touchdown on Earth and we'll have to pay respects in the chat to all those adventurous "explorers". God forbid if they already have monitored some of the history here.
There is water above the firmament.
Aliens don't exist.
@@jesus4400 the award for the most bs comment of 2023 goes to u my friend LOL
The capsules center of air pressure and center of mass are offset. The capsule steers its way through the atmosphere by rotating thus changing the direction of lift. Apollo spacecraft returned to earth the same way. What a perfect way to see the steering mechanism in action. Thanks for the video.
this was the one remaining HD uncut footage for me to witness in regard to entry/re-entry, in full glory! wow! JUST WOW! made my year! Many thanks to all those involved, those putting in all the effort and hard work, we truly appreciate your contributions to further evolution of mankind.