Love the Huxwrx flow 7.62 TI. Huge improvement over the previous models. Performs well on 5.56 and 300 blackout subsonic rounds. PewScience has great write up on it as well. Worth the money!
I've been wanting a can to run on my 5.56 guns for a while, after seeing Jay's numbers and all of these reviews...I might be getting the Flow 762 Ti. Hell, I might even try it on my Vepr AK...I just need to check the alignment and make sure its concentrically threaded. Only way I know to check this is with an actual suppressor, so worst care scenario I just got myself a new muzzle brake/flash hider for my AK 😂
Dude, check out the new Griffin Armament Cans. They are flow through, and have cracked the code with the big 3 features. Reduced, back-pressure, low flash, and great sound.
What do you expect for the durability of this can being printed in titanium? Great video laying out a lot of useful, real-world info for understanding this new suppressor especially in context to other designs.
Man, you guys should check out Griffins cans. They have cracked the code on reduced backpressure, sound reduction, and flash reduction. Their new M4SD-L is freaking amazing. That tech is being carried over to all their new lines. Their absolutely HARD use HRT7 is amazing. They also have invested in a B&k sound setup. Which involved world renowned sound scientists coming out to help them set it up. They are the only other place besides pew which offer pressure wave form tests and AHAAH data. Except theirs is raw data and not gatekeeped behind a paywall and an ambiguous rating system.
"No surprise that the Polonium is quieter if you pay attention to PEWScience" Uhhhhhh the Polonium has a pretty bad at-ear rating. Like, even lower than the Sandman-S tested on 5.56.
Right, but compare the Polonium to both sets of Maxim DSX data. No tuning, they were close at both ear and muzzle. The tuned SURG with a more restrictive gas port made the ear rating fly up.
They ran it on a tuned host, pew uses an untuned host. The review he did recently with the Maxim shows that a tuned host with a hugh back pressure silencer can be quieter than a untuned host with a flow through.
Awesome video! Been trying to decide if I should bite the bullet and get either a Flow 556k or 762Ti for my untuned 14.5” BCM, or just get an adjustable gas block and new buffer and spring and go for a polonium K. Would you say the sound at the muzzle for all 3 would be comparable? And can you tune the polonium K to be way less gassy and have reasonable sound at the shooter’s ear?
The polonium was quieter for sure, but the one we shot was the full size not the k. That being said, to get it to not be gassy, Chris had to do a fair amount of work tuning the gun. Now that its tuned up its quite pleasant, but, its still more gassy than either of the flows.
@@modernwarriorsut would you be willing to share what kind of tuning was done? was there anything more than changing buffer spring & weights (or maybe changing to an A5 buffer system) and adding an adjustable gas block, and possibly using an adjustable bcg (bootleg)? thanks!
@@JGO219 With this suppressor we didn't change anything about how the guns were set up before running it. Thats one big advantage of these suppressors is you really dont have to do much to get the guns to run well with them.
@@modernwarriorsut thanks for the reply but I was asking about the tuning you guys were referring to for Chris's gun to run the Polonium full size smoothly!
@@JGO219 Ohhhhh gotcha, he spent a fare amount of time testing out different buffer weights, buffer springs and even gas blocks to find the combination that worked best for his rifle. He is still making small improvements here and there
you will have to use a muzzle device by Huxwrx to do it. If im not mistaken, the zpap has M26x1.5 LH thread pattern, and Huxwrx does make an adapter for that thread pattern
I don't believe Sandman S is a direct comparison to the flow 762 ti. Sandman is a cobalt alloy can with thick stainless outer walls, you are more likely to kill the gun before wear it out. While flow762ti will likely need some significant cool down in very few 'full semi' mags to prevent major sparking and accelerated erosion(mind you, only 10k-20k rds lifespan on their 17-4 cored cans).
This is a nice video except several shooters are not wearing eye protection when firing the firearm demonstrating the suppressor. I think that’s a big no-no especially if you are on RUclips
Love the Huxwrx flow 7.62 TI. Huge improvement over the previous models. Performs well on 5.56 and 300 blackout subsonic rounds. PewScience has great write up on it as well. Worth the money!
We agree, it definitely sounded great on 556
Great review of this can! Really enjoyed the comparison!
Would love to see a comparison of the flow 762 to the nomad 30! Trying to decide between those two.
Bought one, know I'm going to love it like my 556k.
You guys really need to wear eye pro.
I've been wanting a can to run on my 5.56 guns for a while, after seeing Jay's numbers and all of these reviews...I might be getting the Flow 762 Ti. Hell, I might even try it on my Vepr AK...I just need to check the alignment and make sure its concentrically threaded. Only way I know to check this is with an actual suppressor, so worst care scenario I just got myself a new muzzle brake/flash hider for my AK 😂
Dude, check out the new Griffin Armament Cans. They are flow through, and have cracked the code with the big 3 features. Reduced, back-pressure, low flash, and great sound.
@@Faustian_Spirit I was considering those, trying to find more reviews and experiences on the Dual-LOK
Please do a night video! Very interested and now subbed.
We can make that happen!
What do you expect for the durability of this can being printed in titanium? Great video laying out a lot of useful, real-world info for understanding this new suppressor especially in context to other designs.
While i wouldnt personally run it on a machine gun for extreme durations of fire, i expect it to hold up well for most peoples uses.
We have found this can to be even more durable than our HX-QD 762 Stainless Steel can! It even surprised us and we made it lol
@@HUXWRX HELL YEAH! Thats great information to know!
@@HUXWRX that’s awesome 😂
Great review, Gentlemen! Thank you!
Our pleasure!
Great video. Thanks guys!
Man, you guys should check out Griffins cans. They have cracked the code on reduced backpressure, sound reduction, and flash reduction. Their new M4SD-L is freaking amazing. That tech is being carried over to all their new lines. Their absolutely HARD use HRT7 is amazing. They also have invested in a B&k sound setup. Which involved world renowned sound scientists coming out to help them set it up. They are the only other place besides pew which offer pressure wave form tests and AHAAH data. Except theirs is raw data and not gatekeeped behind a paywall and an ambiguous rating system.
I’m waiting on 300BLK data from Pew Science as well, but I was just curious if you guys tried it and what your experience was?
We didn't get a chance to run that caliber during the tests sadly.
haha you said 'Tactical' now we gotta drink.. damnit! that was the wrong word to use in our MEtube drinking game..still on first page and i'm hammered
Sold!... I need one now hahaha!
Hit us up!
@@modernwarriorsutdo you guys still have some available?
@@MrMongxiong93 at the moment we do have them
@@modernwarriorsut how do I purchase? Never bought one before.
@@MrMongxiong93 give our boys a call and they will be happy to assist you! 435-656-4590
go with the flow
"No surprise that the Polonium is quieter if you pay attention to PEWScience"
Uhhhhhh the Polonium has a pretty bad at-ear rating. Like, even lower than the Sandman-S tested on 5.56.
Right, but compare the Polonium to both sets of Maxim DSX data. No tuning, they were close at both ear and muzzle. The tuned SURG with a more restrictive gas port made the ear rating fly up.
They ran it on a tuned host, pew uses an untuned host. The review he did recently with the Maxim shows that a tuned host with a hugh back pressure silencer can be quieter than a untuned host with a flow through.
Did you have to run the Huxwrx with a barrel shoulder ring on the Scar?
Can’t make up my mind over ti or 556 or ventum
We think the TI sounds better. And while its slightly bigger, it physically weighs less so its not as noticeable on the front of the gun.
@@modernwarriorsutabout to order the 762 ti for my scar 17 thanks for all the info
Where do you get that wood foregrip that was on the RD ak?
It was custom made by the owner of the gun.
does this new 762 perform better than your HX-QD 762 Ti suppressor
yes, the new flow 762 TI sounded better than the older HX-QD 762 models.
Awesome video! Been trying to decide if I should bite the bullet and get either a Flow 556k or 762Ti for my untuned 14.5” BCM, or just get an adjustable gas block and new buffer and spring and go for a polonium K. Would you say the sound at the muzzle for all 3 would be comparable? And can you tune the polonium K to be way less gassy and have reasonable sound at the shooter’s ear?
The polonium was quieter for sure, but the one we shot was the full size not the k. That being said, to get it to not be gassy, Chris had to do a fair amount of work tuning the gun. Now that its tuned up its quite pleasant, but, its still more gassy than either of the flows.
@@modernwarriorsut would you be willing to share what kind of tuning was done? was there anything more than changing buffer spring & weights (or maybe changing to an A5 buffer system) and adding an adjustable gas block, and possibly using an adjustable bcg (bootleg)? thanks!
@@JGO219 With this suppressor we didn't change anything about how the guns were set up before running it. Thats one big advantage of these suppressors is you really dont have to do much to get the guns to run well with them.
@@modernwarriorsut thanks for the reply but I was asking about the tuning you guys were referring to for Chris's gun to run the Polonium full size smoothly!
@@JGO219 Ohhhhh gotcha, he spent a fare amount of time testing out different buffer weights, buffer springs and even gas blocks to find the combination that worked best for his rifle. He is still making small improvements here and there
Will this fit on a zpap92’s fat muzzle ?
you will have to use a muzzle device by Huxwrx to do it. If im not mistaken, the zpap has M26x1.5 LH thread pattern, and Huxwrx does make an adapter for that thread pattern
How much is this?
I don't believe Sandman S is a direct comparison to the flow 762 ti. Sandman is a cobalt alloy can with thick stainless outer walls, you are more likely to kill the gun before wear it out. While flow762ti will likely need some significant cool down in very few 'full semi' mags to prevent major sparking and accelerated erosion(mind you, only 10k-20k rds lifespan on their 17-4 cored cans).
How well does it work on 300wm
Sadly we didnt get a chance to run it on 300win
So you can put the flow 5.56 on the scar 17s?
no, but the flow 762 works very well.
Does Huxwrx have a suppress, for a DD5Pro 6.5?
This suppressor would work on that rifle
Nobody cares how far your shells eject buddy.
This is a nice video except several shooters are not wearing eye protection when firing the firearm demonstrating the suppressor. I think that’s a big no-no especially if you are on RUclips
😂 I can't believe I just read that
Based