@@aseem7w9 yes but it kinda scales up the NG series. The MAX 7 is longer than the -700 but the -600 was the shortest version of the NG. Basically shorter shortest variant in the prior generation so longer longest variant in the new generation
With modern engines getting larger, the future 737s will have to be redesigned afresh to have higher ground clearance like it's competitor A320 family. It's the forceful fixing of huge engines on the 737 model that caused problems for the Max in the first place.
737 max 10 has a new and higher landing gear to accomodate all that extra weight, the other 737 max variants have no use for higher ground clearance hence they don't have this new gear.
It replaces the 757 in Boeing’s lineup. That market was rather dead in the United States (hence the 757 being cancelled) until fairly recently. The A321 has been the only jet to come anywhere near the 757 in capability (hence it taking so long to catch on here in the US). So basically the A321 is a Cinderella story-started off slow here, and wound up in the right place at the right time. They’re amazing jets, but I also have full faith in the MAX alongside.
i just notice now how a portion of the engine cowling for the max is actually slightly above the wing surface level. This shows you the positioning that boeing had to do to get the bigger engines to fit in the older lower design of the 737 compared to the a321 which is designed from the beginning with higher wing clearance.
and that created the problem of pitching up and a possible stalling which then required the mcas to be set in place to correct that pitching... a problem is corrected but the correction created a problem of its own which required making sure that there should at least be two sensors and that the mcas can be switched off by the pilot immediately...
@@anthonydecastro6938 - Not true. The position of the engine is unimportant. All underwing engines cause a pitch-up moment. This new engine has higher takeoff thrust than the NG series engines, so has a different profile and requires additional trim. MCAS was added to supply the additional trim during takeoff.
@@GH-oi2jf of course it is important. the 737 aircraft sit so closely to the ground that it can accommodate bigger engines only up to a point (otherwise it will hit the ground), and bigger engines are important for efficiency and fuel savings. so Boeing had to push the engines higher and forward in the max. thus the pitching, thus the mcas, thus the need for redundant sensors, etc. this problem does bot exist for other older 737 models.
That's exactly the structural flaw in the jet. This should be banned completely. Families who lost their loved ones, cannot be compensated for their loss. Regardless of fresh training of the pilots and acquainting them with MCAS, jet's engines are placed above the wing, which tends to lead the plan for a stall. Don't board this aircraft.
structurally infirm...those jet engines look like they are close to scraping the ground; Boeing just did not want to raise the landing and take off gear...
The 737s have always been close to the ground. Boeing did redesign the main gear for more height on this model. It is needed to avoid tail dragging on takeoff.
@@GH-oi2jf not enough. boeing did not want to incur further costs required by redesigning the landing and take-off gear for a higher ground clearance; thus the limitations on the size of the engines which were the ones redesigned by making their bottoms flatter to clear the ground. the 737s as currently designed are at their last stretch...
@@anthonydecastro6938 Boeing intends the 737 to has ground clearance as low as possible since day 1 when they announce 737 original to make ground handling operation easier hence the low height landing gear and even flattened engine nacelle.
@@chris22capt tell me something i don't already know. of course the original 737 was designed that way. for heaven's sake, the MAX is its 3rd or 4th reincarnation and Boeing could have done something to redesign its landing gear!!! that's the whole point!
damn, i gotta say that's not some very impressive camera work also, taking photos while filming with the camera? i'm speechless... you know you can frame grab right but aside from that, really cool video
It is a grave. The plane has a design flaw and works on a software for detection and correction. It is unbelievable how such a structurally flawed aircraft is permitted to fly again. Do not board this aircraft. Spread the word. Thank you.
It is not a grave if you have common knowledge about planes and aviation you will know that this was fixed and also that the issue occurred on the MAX 8, not the MAX 10 this comment just spreads fear for no reason. Also, nothing is wrong with the structure of the plane it crashed because of a system called the MCAS. Before you go spreading fear get your facts right.
Structurally flawed and software malfunction in the same paragraph. I like how everyone noticed it's 57,000lbs lighter, carries over 3000 gallons less fuel. If it's optimized for it's mission profile it's perfect. Airlines buy it for profit, imagine that. I'll gladly put my family on one. Get on the airli es for their training and the FAA for their oversight not the plane. It's just fine.
How is it a grave? The max,10 does not have a design flaw. There is no mcas so no need for software to detect any corrections. Its unbelievable that you think it's a structurally flawed aircraft that should not fly. The max 10 is not structurally flawed and will eventually fly. Evenness will get a chance to fly on it once its certified. The word to spread is Do fly on it. Thank you
![THE NEW BOEING 737 MAX 10 and MORE! Plane Spotting at Boeing Field [4K]](/img/1.gif)
The largest 737 ever made. They will be a great replacement for the 737-900ER's!
Longer bigger even more NCAA more unstable Wow
737 MAX 9 replaces 737-900 tho?
@@aseem7w9 yes but it kinda scales up the NG series. The MAX 7 is longer than the -700 but the -600 was the shortest version of the NG. Basically shorter shortest variant in the prior generation so longer longest variant in the new generation
What the hell? Bring back the 757.
If a new 757 would sell and if there was demand for it they would've brought it back, you aren't smarter about what plane is more beneficial.
I doesn't like 757
@@xgarion24yt68 And that's why you are a bad person.
With modern engines getting larger, the future 737s will have to be redesigned afresh to have higher ground clearance like it's competitor A320 family. It's the forceful fixing of huge engines on the 737 model that caused problems for the Max in the first place.
737 max 10 has a new and higher landing gear to accomodate all that extra weight, the other 737 max variants have no use for higher ground clearance hence they don't have this new gear.
MashAllah Excellent
شکر الحمداللہ ہم تو کب سے 737 میکس ائیر کرافٹ کی کامیابی کے لئے دعا گو ہیں
I heard how this plane was meant to replace the 757 but the A321XLR seems to be replacing more 757s than any other plane… 🤔
737 max wants to replace ng's
@@kjhhhossas1790 We’ll see how that goes!
It replaces the 757 in Boeing’s lineup. That market was rather dead in the United States (hence the 757 being cancelled) until fairly recently. The A321 has been the only jet to come anywhere near the 757 in capability (hence it taking so long to catch on here in the US). So basically the A321 is a Cinderella story-started off slow here, and wound up in the right place at the right time. They’re amazing jets, but I also have full faith in the MAX alongside.
@@ChrisZoomER A321XLR hasn't even flown tho
@@aseem7w9 I know
i just notice now how a portion of the engine cowling for the max is actually slightly above the wing surface level. This shows you the positioning that boeing had to do to get the bigger engines to fit in the older lower design of the 737 compared to the a321 which is designed from the beginning with higher wing clearance.
and that created the problem of pitching up and a possible stalling which then required the mcas to be set in place to correct that pitching... a problem is corrected but the correction created a problem of its own which required making sure that there should at least be two sensors and that the mcas can be switched off by the pilot immediately...
@@anthonydecastro6938 - Not true. The position of the engine is unimportant. All underwing engines cause a pitch-up moment. This new engine has higher takeoff thrust than the NG series engines, so has a different profile and requires additional trim. MCAS was added to supply the additional trim during takeoff.
@@GH-oi2jf of course it is important. the 737 aircraft sit so closely to the ground that it can accommodate bigger engines only up to a point (otherwise it will hit the ground), and bigger engines are important for efficiency and fuel savings. so Boeing had to push the engines higher and forward in the max. thus the pitching, thus the mcas, thus the need for redundant sensors, etc. this problem does bot exist for other older 737 models.
@@GH-oi2jf sorry M8, I'm siding with Anthony here
That's exactly the structural flaw in the jet. This should be banned completely. Families who lost their loved ones, cannot be compensated for their loss. Regardless of fresh training of the pilots and acquainting them with MCAS, jet's engines are placed above the wing, which tends to lead the plan for a stall. Don't board this aircraft.
First! And I LOVE the Max 10. ❤️❤️❤️
thanks for watching
Nothing rom me please@@Danmanz08
Nothing for me@@Danmanz08
@@matthewdehavilandkay8449 Thank you for watching as well.
Espero de todo corazón que ésta vez, no tenga ningún percance éste modelo de avión. La credibilidad en BOEING está por los suelos.
Awesome achievement for Boeing and all their employees.👍
I hope it improve a lot than max 8
It's just longer that's it
This would be the closest thing to a "757 Max 8"
Please make it B737 MAX XR to competented with A321XLR
Is also the biggest 737 ever lol! Great work!
That is a looooong 737!
Maybe 10 is actually "lO" for "lOOOOOOng"
Gorgeous airplane!!
Anything but gorgeous……it’s quite ugly.
@@chrispaw1 someone needs glasses!
But dangerous lol
@@twinchantillytiffanysbenny8852 it looks like something from the 1960's
@@chrispaw1 because the 737 was designed in the ‘60s :/ and it’s still a beautiful jet :)
T-2 is very rare with Boeing on most test flights,
And I thought they retired them
Naw Boeing Toy BOX is something amazing
I love your video ❤️❤️
Thank you!
It is long enough to be a Boeing 707 if it has 4 engines
Nice Max 10😀👍🏻
why was it so difficult to redesign the undercarriage to be longer like other aircraft, in hindsight it might turn out to have been cheaper
A prime example of the saying, “penny wise, pound foolish.”
Thats my bird!! Work on it everyday!!
Hermosísimo
GCAS makes the plane not crash
MCAS makes the plane crash
You mean it didn’t crash??
Does this guy is flying on ryanair
Long boi
Love that engine roar!!!!
Sounds exactly like a Trent 700
Its too long for its ground clearance height and the engines are a major concern as there too big for again its height clearance off the ground
Nope not true
Where’s the part where it lawn darts?
LMAO, Airbus gonna rule the skies for decades to come. Make a 757 max, would compete better with A321 Neo
what about boeing 777 - 300 er 😵💫
@@aviationlover3063 ….that’s too big to compete with the a321 neo
Everybody loves the 757s. And that's the one they decided not to make any more.
@@jrwoodson3927 757 is dead, we need the 767
@@NorcalValleyRailfan The 767 is a wide body. He said to compete with the neo which is a narrow body as is the 757.
И на заднем плане стабилизатор самолёта s7 airlines
I like fly 737 of Boeing.
Next Problem: Collapsed Landing Gear :3
I wonder if Southwest is ordering B737-10??
I think they ordered all 737-7 max
@@shawnkendrick69 and max-8
@@shawnkendrick69 idk y Boeing's 700 and below series r so short
nope they bought the less efficient smaller jet the max 7
Pilot forgot to retract landing gear !! 🤦
Ryanair casually sits there
structurally infirm...those jet engines look like they are close to scraping the ground; Boeing just did not want to raise the landing and take off gear...
The 737s have always been close to the ground. Boeing did redesign the main gear for more height on this model. It is needed to avoid tail dragging on takeoff.
@@GH-oi2jf not enough.
boeing did not want to incur further costs required by redesigning the landing and take-off gear for a higher ground clearance; thus the limitations on the size of the engines which were the ones redesigned by making their bottoms flatter to clear the ground. the 737s as currently designed are at their last stretch...
@@anthonydecastro6938 Boeing intends the 737 to has ground clearance as low as possible since day 1 when they announce 737 original to make ground handling operation easier hence the low height landing gear and even flattened engine nacelle.
@@chris22capt tell me something i don't already know. of course the original 737 was designed that way. for heaven's sake, the MAX is its 3rd or 4th reincarnation and Boeing could have done something to redesign its landing gear!!! that's the whole point!
@@anthonydecastro6938 but why redesign? Current landing gear design is the best for low ground clearance
0:24 look at the bottom of your screen
That longer nose gear really destroys the look of the plane.
No it doesn't
You must be imagining that, because this model has longer main gear as well.
@@GH-oi2jf I'm imagening the nose gear being longer because the main gear is also longer? What is the logic behind that?
5:00 ryanair
looks kind of short for a -10
Yes yes true
MCAS
Nope
damn, i gotta say that's not some very impressive camera work
also, taking photos while filming with the camera? i'm speechless... you know you can frame grab right
but aside from that, really cool video
*AND SHORTLY AFTER, IT CRASHED DUE TO GREED..... 😑*
Airbus is greed too don't for one second think their not
@Andrew Larson I agree, they are all competing with one another and the customer is an afterthought.
Oh so a crash is because of greed?
Nice
Thank you
United very first MAX 10,
Yup! Third built max 10 has united livery colors
Capacity: 321neo
Range: 321neo
Efficiency: 321neo
More expensive: 737 max 😵💫
truee
Not true.
737 max 10 is more efficient tho
Its also about teaching your pilots from a 737 pilot to a 320 or 321 pilot. Think about how much time and money that will cost
@@levinog278 And ground equipment another high cost to switch aircraft.
its going to fail like dc10 and md11
737 is the worst
Mcas again with accident B737 MAX 8 repeat again. 🤣🤣🤣😅
It is a grave. The plane has a design flaw and works on a software for detection and correction. It is unbelievable how such a structurally flawed aircraft is permitted to fly again. Do not board this aircraft. Spread the word. Thank you.
Because it got fixed, a very simple fix actually. The 737 MAX series is completely fine now.
It is not a grave if you have common knowledge about planes and aviation you will know that this was fixed and also that the issue occurred on the MAX 8, not the MAX 10 this comment just spreads fear for no reason. Also, nothing is wrong with the structure of the plane it crashed because of a system called the MCAS.
Before you go spreading fear get your facts right.
Structurally flawed and software malfunction in the same paragraph. I like how everyone noticed it's 57,000lbs lighter, carries over 3000 gallons less fuel. If it's optimized for it's mission profile it's perfect. Airlines buy it for profit, imagine that. I'll gladly put my family on one. Get on the airli es for their training and the FAA for their oversight not the plane. It's just fine.
How is it a grave? The max,10 does not have a design flaw. There is no mcas so no need for software to detect any corrections. Its unbelievable that you think it's a structurally flawed aircraft that should not fly. The max 10 is not structurally flawed and will eventually fly. Evenness will get a chance to fly on it once its certified. The word to spread is Do fly on it. Thank you