Creating an Animatronic Collie for The Shaggy Dog (2006)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 ноя 2023
- SUBSCRIBE on RUclips: bit.ly/Zp70T4 and RING THE BELL!
FULL STORY here: bit.ly/ShaggyDogYT
March 2006 saw the release of The Shaggy Dog - a Disney production directed by Brian Robbins - which updated the story of the original The Shaggy Dog, released in 1959. In the new version, Tim Allen portrays a work-consumed father and husband who begins to experience frequent transformations into a shaggy canine named Shaggy after he is bitten by a dog whose DNA has been altered.
Paul Mejias led the assignment, building a puppet version of the shaggy dog for shots that couldn't be obtained with the real bearded collie (a dog named Cole). The Animatronic dog had to cut closeup to closeup with the real dog, so it had to match exactly. It was important because there is nothing worse than shots in movies where they suddenly cut to a puppet, and it's just dead and lifeless.
Read the full Building the Hyper-Realistic Shaggy Dog #BehindTheScenes blog here: bit.ly/ShaggyDogYT
More Behind the Scenes at Stan Winston Studio Story here: bit.ly/BlogsYT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JOIN the Stan Winston School Community!
www.stanwinstonschool.com
/ stan_winston_school
/ stanwinstonschool
/ stanwinstonschool
/ stanwinston
Visit our WEBSITE: www.stanwinstonschool.com
SUBSCRIBE to #SWSCA on RUclips: bit.ly/Zp70T4
less than ten seconds??!!!
And we wonder why movies cost so much. Even if they only used it for 10 seconds, they still paid for all that work.
I think they got confused between the real dog and animatronic because it looks so real. I can't believe it was only 10 seconds.
They captured the likeness of the dog to an amazing level not only by looks but also its behaviour and movement
Practical effects is such a beautiful art form.
Back when the movie industry actually saw the value in practical effects, instead of insisting on using CGI for absolutely everything.
If this movie were made today, then they would 100% use CGI for every single scene.
And because of using cgi would look like crap 😂
Lol how much did that 10 seconds of screen time cost that production? :D
Was Cole spooked by the animatronic? I’m guessing it must’ve been weird to see a dog who looked real but didn’t smell real.
That dog on fent
Wow it is remarkable life like and smooth moving, the Stan Winston team did amazing. However I'd still say it was a failure of the film production to not be able to calculate how much effort and budget be put where. I mean 10 seconds?! Even if you learn a lot from the experience, what a waste. If I had worked on that I'd be crying.
Now to be fair, you can never predict exactly what will happen with live animals and will always need something done as back up as the Winston team has experienced before and since on other animal films.
Oh, so that’s how they captured the scenes with the two dogs in the same shot
Wow, I already imagined a mimetic polyalloy dog 😮
The effecs are cute
Gracias a todas las personas que haceis posible esto, ayudáis e inspiráis a mucha gente que quiere formar parte de este mundo de la animatrónica y que le apasiona este mundo y aprecia lo físico y lo artesanal en el ambito audiovisual por encima del CGI. Mil gracias! 🙏😊
Stan Winston School = Fallout4 Institute
Lets face it, Tony Stark was the bad guy in this movie..
Amazing
сначала собаки, потом люди и потом... апокалипсис
Edward?
NO
WOW. Imagine this artistry married to A.I.! 🤯
How exactly? the fun part of this is not being cgi lmao
@@kepagl Um, I didn't allude to cgi once. I said "artificial intelligence," i.e., these wonderfully crafter automatons under [a degree of] self-governance.
How about cgi to enhance facial expressions. AI runs artists out of jobs and many of these engines run off of huge accumulations of stolen artwork and footage to meld together into a new result
@@dare2win215 aha, but it makes no sense for this lmao, It wouldnt make It any better (any ai generated image is made by a computer so...still cgi)
@@kepagl it's interesting how making an abstract statement (not even a suggestion/recommendation) about current/future trends elicits such misunderstandings. Folks will invent strife where there is none. You have a blessed day, foolishness isn't my topic of choice.