Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
The Tissot PRX..DIGITAL? Hands-On With the Entire Line
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 авг 2024
- Shop The Entire Collection On TeddyBaldassarre.com Here: teddybaldassar...
Shop Watches: teddybaldassar...
Written Content: www.teddybalda...
Subscribe To Our Newsletter For The Latest Watch Releases & Special Offers In Our Shop: teddybaldassar...
In this video, we go hands-on with the all-new Tissot PRX Digital. Available in both the 35mm and 40mm case diameters, these funky new versions of the PRX are powered by a Swiss digital movement full of sporty features while being housed in the class-leading PRX case and bracelet. What do you think of the PRX Digital?
Watches Featured:
Tissot PRX Digital 35mm Silver: teddybaldassar...
Tissot PRX Digital 35mm Black & Silver: teddybaldassar...
Tissot PRX Digital 35mm Gold: teddybaldassar...
Tissot PRX Digital 40mm Silver: teddybaldassar...
Tissot PRX Digital 40mm Black & Silver: teddybaldassar...
Tissot PRX Digital 40mm Gold: teddybaldassar...
Instagram: www.instagram....
Top Articles On TeddyBaldassarre.com:
50 Luxury Watch Brands You Should Know: teddybaldassar...
10 Affordable Watch Brands And Their Best Watches: teddybaldassar...
Best Watches Under $5,000 Complete Guide: teddybaldassar...
Timestamps
0:00 Into & Organization
0:40 History
2:39 Overview
7:06 Final Thoughts
Funnily enough, this is the PRX I'd consider buying 🤷🏻♂️
100% it’s a phenomenal watch!
I thought I was dreaming, would have never thought to see this - a PRX version I was wishing for - happen for real. I always liked the PRX for the bracelet, but I don't like watches that resemble hype watches like the royal oak. Also, I like Casios, but have dealt with too many scratched glasses and rubber bands that turned brittle and tore eventually, this is the perfect alternative, great job Tissot!
I don’t understand why I love this thing. Doesn’t make sense but I’m getting one
Same, over where I'm at theyre going for $200 and I'm really considering it. Saw someone put it on a black leather strap and it just looks gorgeous
They should have done it in LED like the pulsar. For at least a time, they couldn’t make them fast enough.
💯
That could have been a better move no doubt. My thoughts were to have it on a rubber strap as well. Maybe someones pool watch for vacation?
@@66racerI'm sure the current rubber strap that they offer for the PRX will fit.
Give me a G shock any day its fudge pants may as well buy a nice silver chain for your wrist its only the strap try a zelos swordfish even better strap without the watch add the watch and no comparison
Yeah an LED would have been a much better way to go, they could have been playful with the colour of the display, even have multi-colour option
It’s fantastic to see a $300 digital PRX with all the functions of a $10 digital F-91W
costs 538usd in europe
Casio A1000RCG-8BER Sapphire crystal glass, stainless steel case, stainless steel band, 250$
yes, if you ignore that the Casio F-91W is just cheap plastic watch with a strap that wont last longer than a couple of years. With a plastic crystal that will scratch in no time. And a backlight that is pretty much useless.By the way, the F-91 does not have a 24 hour countdown timer and a second timezone.
@@TheMortonclayton I like it. (I have the A1000MGA-5EF myself). I just wished the A1000 series had a higher waterproof rating than 30 meters.
@@hait3k435usd actually.
This looks like an off season april fools joke
Sales will tell ...
@@azimczor lack thereof
I 2nd that emotion🤣
Looks 😂like a naked Gshock on a Tissot Prx strap
I actually thought it was. I was impressed by the photoshop. I have no idea what someone would be thinking in buying this. To all their own.
Somehow this comes off as even more late '70s than the regular PRX models. I don't think this is for me, but nobody can accuse Tissot of being predictable here. What I would have loved to see was a 37.5 or 38mm PRX launch.
This is more late 70s than the actual PRX from the 70s
I don’t think that is likely while also keeping the 35 mm. It’s just a lot to ask for.
It is a beautiful watch in the classic style of this model series with an easy-to-read and especially large display with other useful functions. I'm not a Tissot fan, but they nailed this watch. Many people will welcome the retro style with a digital display, because it is large and you have useful functions after hands.
I agree and getting one myself.
Not sure why so many people are hating on this when they had no problem paying $260 for a Moonswatch that had marginally better quality than a Happy Meal toy. At least this is an actual watch made of steel and sapphire.
But this one looks like an Happy Meal toy.
Your first sentence said it all, good point and all too true.
Agreed, Materials and performance matter in some people’s purchasing journey. Also The design is maybe initially off putting, but I think it will do well enough and be at least somewhat collectible over time. I see the gold, as well as the smaller case version catching a bit more attention from buyers/collectors.
I rather pay for the swatch because it is about design. This is shet of a watch.
FWIW I also have a problem paying $ 260 for a Moonswatch. Not hating on either though.
This ain’t it.
100% Agree
Yeah I hate it, it's burning my eyes
I agree. This is just lazy designing. Lol the functions are great but they could have don't better if this was the direction they are headed.
I feel like they’re just trying to get market share with Casio Digitals, but they just don’t get it.
this hurts
I get that Tissot wants to cash in on all the prx hype but come on, this isn’t it. Big L I don’t see people spending more for this than a regular Casio fw91
If you consider full metal casio options it’s not too far off
And i'ts difficult to deny that you get a substantial upgrade on quality and finishing regarding the bracelet and the case.
@@marvinberwartPeople don't seem to realize this is a Swiss watch with premium materials. It is no digital Casio and doesn't compete with one.
I proudly rock my F91W, but just try rocking an A158W for a while, with color taking off, dents and scratches and your hair getting in between the bracelet. It's not the same league.
It's finished more people will buy Solar Gshock, not that swiss rubbish
I think this Tissot is cool. And it's nice to offer much more quality and fit and finish than a Casio BUT ar this price point, they absolutely should have made it solar powered. And they should have make it slimmer with the display closer to the glass to make it appear flatter .
Tissot: more PRX
Tudor: more Black Bay
Seiko: more Seiko 5
Swatch: more MoonSwatch
How surprising.
Rolex: more subs and daytos
Porsche: more 911's
McDonalds: more burgers
People online: more bullshit.
🤷🏼♂️
@@marvinberwartTotally agree, these people are addicted to being disappointed. Searching for hairs in their soup.
From almost anyone but Tissot, I would dig it. This is not the kind of thing Tissot can pull of with sincerity
Tissot made digital watches in the 70's. No I'm glad they make some again. There isn't much choice in well made stainless steel digital watches that is are made by Casio. And even Casio doesn't offer sapphire crystals on digital watches unless you buy the titanium G-Shock square that cost 3 times the price of the Tissot.
I actually like it. I'd take it if given to me, but the Casio A171 (at under $30) is plenty good for me as far as this style goes.
The PRX cases and bracelets are pretty nice though. Ten times as nice? Probably not.
@@charlesforbin8526 yeah the prx is modern as it is much more simplistic therefore cleaner
3 bar vs 10 bar .... lol
I'm all for premium digitals, Gshock is the only one doing it and most of their offerings are big and loud. This is ALMOST what I'm looking for, but what I really want is an all metal A168.
No such thing as premium digital. It's all cheap Chinese tech.
Try the Casio A1000 series.
@@bdegrds
As far as Casio goes, Tough Solar, Multiband 6, Bluetooth, that’s pretty premium for a digital watch.
As usual, the Swiss made no effort to elevate this digital watch.
Premium A158 with superior backlight for me, but i agree with you.
Only one doing it?? 😂
They're milking the PRX now and it's too much.
It's like that dude who makes a girl laugh once then gets the flush and goes into a chain of more jokes that get worse and worse
My initial thought was shock, but then I started appreciating the approach Tissot has taken, it is very distinctive and I like it 🙂
They should have made the display round.
I think they can't because of the movement
@@markenlightenment7101 Yeah perhaps. But why not use a different movement then? One that would have a round display to suit the case of the watch. 🤷🏻
@@catalinpogor3014 I believe they want something in a specific price range, the prices can change a lot with a different movement, especially considering that this is swiss quartz in the end
With this, they have a very good competitor on the market for a "small digital chronograph with steel case and bracelet"
Also sourcing Chinese and Japanese movements on a Swiss watch? No thanks
It’s not the movement that’s the issue…it’s the case , they are just using the same blanks
@@xgford94I don't know the real reason they did this, but it looks so off to me.
a digital with no date on the main display is a huge miss
I perceive this as ‘It’s so bad that it’s good’. I want one and will definitely try on to see if the 35mm looks like it should on my wrist.
I don’t know if I like it or hate it…it is unique. Great video as always Teddy👍🏻
I grew up in the 70's. I may have bought one then. I may even buy one now. I just wish it was solar powered and the dial was somewhat embellished around the digital display.
It surprises me that Tissot did this. But, thinking about it, it shouldn’t. A Seiko A159-4039G that I bought to commemorate my high school graduation has been seeing a lot of wrist time this past summer. It seems nostalgia (or should I say retro?) is in right now.
I have ordered one of these (35mm Silver), got it very cheap here in the U.K(30% off plus a load of gift vouchers I'd been saving over the past 2 years got it to £45!) I'm guessing they are not popular) - I was born in 93 and I find it strange that I can look at watches which designs date before I was born and find them nostalgic(even though I wasn't even alive) - what a crazy hobby we enjoy 😁
I love it! I might make this my only digital watch!
Next: tissot prx sun clock
Love it - the first PRX I’m seriously considering 👍
Same here. I never cared for the regular PRX. But this one I'm going to get.
I think this is one of those things that will put people off at first but over time will grow on collectors. Especially if they quickly discontinue the production. Design wise I think it’s a missed opportunity to not utilize the entire dial as a screen. It would keep the overall design of the case while offering even more function for the price range.
While I agree with most of your points, I think not using the entire dial as a screen is a strict design choice. If they used the whole dial, the watch would've looked more like a smartwatch, which means people would've expected different things than what they expect from a retro looking digital watch.
@@halua1969 You are correct, I do agree people would have an expectation of utilization. If they did make the entire dial a display, I think it would be best if it was just larger numbers and the Tissot branding at the top. A simple blend between digital and analog. No smart watch stuff, just one clean interesting look. I think that might be cool, though this is also a unique look already.
They are making a retro watch, and the screen size is almost exactly how company like Omega, Casio, Seiko, Timex made them back in 70s/80s.
Solar would have been nice. Otherwise, not bad at all.
Not happening.
The Swiss won’t bother.
Solar and radio control should be standard on this watch.
@@e28forever30 Yes, it needs solar, radio control, and date. The display looks too small in proportion to the dial. Information is poorly organized. Overall, it's a half-baked design.
Can Tissot take a moment to concentrate on something other than PRX? I’ve been hoping they would make a smaller version of the Gentleman (36 to 38mm), Hamilton listened to the public & made a smaller version of the Murph
Business is business, any successful company will put their focus on what's selling the most, and the PRX is making them a lot of money right now
Yes, sadly.
My most accurate watch. Very good build quality. And I'm not ashamed to admit that i like the design.
I just bought one of them and I got it under 300usd because of father’s day discount and it quality is notable especially in this price point. 🎉
I would of liked an analog/digital display watch over straight digital, but having a sapphire crystal is great. Certina has a steel and titanium digital watch that similar to this price range
*would have
What model ?
A Casio A168 with this build quality please.
I love it! looks awesome, I own a Casio a158w wear it every day and would love to own the new Tissot PRX digital watch.
thanks for the vid! if tissot really wanted to do a digi-watch, i would have liked something interesting with the screen instead of a liquid crystal display. maybe eink? i guess it works as an homage though.
Holy crap. I’m into these. My appreciation for Casio grows as the years pass and this addresses the cheap bracelet, plastic crystal and body that Casio loves.
F91W is a masterpiece
Casio has already had the metal case/band and mineral crystal model (casio a1000)
@@sonson-ct9cm I have an a1000. The mesh bracelet is a better alternative to their folded link standard, but I wish it had sapphire and water resistance better than 30m.
@@billybenson3834 they are iconic. I have two.
@@bryanthebryan2638 I agree 👍 The 100m wr of the PRX is more reliable
Considering the amount of unused real estate on the face of the watch you could add a solar panel around the display. Maybe on the next edition?
I wouldn’t count on it.
The Swiss are resting on their laurels as far as Quartz watches go.
No Solar, no radio control.
The rectangle inside the circle is an odd design choice that I’m not sure works that well.
it's awful, looks like an afterthought
Omega thought otherwise decades ago.
Most digital watches looked like this in the 70s
I like the prx but find this version awful + it has become so common and overdone now that I'm bored with it in general.
Not to throw shade on this watch, but it is insane how casio can package a watch with all the same functions (albeit with cheaper materials, but still), and you can buy this casio watch using the change money if you were to buy this tissot with $400 all $100 dollar bills. Crazy!
I’m not opposed to the idea of a digital PRX, but the square display just seems too poorly integrated into the round dial (especially on the 40mm version)
I love retro digitals. I’m going to add this to my PSR and Computron.
It’s not for me, but I like it 👍
I think this is the coolest looking Tissot...I don't mind the PRX, but I think this is more original in todays watch design. I think they missed a trick however, especially on the steel and black, where the black could have been a solar panel to make the watch solar power rather than battery. But apart from that, the price is great and looks amazing
Love it! Another cool watch in the quiver!
Weirdly, having been a teen in the 1970's, this is truely retro,more so than the original PRX IMHO,
I'd need to see it but the gold PVD 35mm may be a hit with many.
It will date though and Casio could probably do it for less.
Not something I was expecting from Tissot. Still,no one expects The Spanish Inquisition either unless they are Pythoners.
I wish the display took up the whole dial. Or at least it was a round display mirroring the shape case
I totally love it. I'll probably get one soon. I've been looking for swiss digital watches, and the ones I like turn out to be mostly vintage. Nothing wrong with vintage, but here is a brand new one.
Brings the whole line of PRX to a lower level. The only reason why Teddy didn’t bash the digital version is because he’s an AD and is “in bed” with Tissot. Idk why he even did the video. Maybe he’s required by contract or knows he’s going to be stuck with inventory and wants to generate some sales. Regardless it’s obvious this watch could have been done so much better😮
Hallo Teddy, very first reaction was, no. But I kept on watching and got more friendly with the idea. What I do like is that for a digital watch it can be worn as a elegant watch, because it is done very softly. I mean a quiet watch. So good job from tissot. Thanks from Switzerland 🇨🇭, rachel
I like it, but this is one I buy on sale or with a discount code after doing some drinking.
Wasn't it P. T. Barnum who said "there's sucker born every minute"? This is Tissot's rebuttal to Casio.
Again with the PRX! Alright, it's kinda brilliant. When will Tissot start paying some attention to the Gentleman? A 36-38mm version would be delightful.
I love the PRX and I have a 35mm quartz version, but I agree the Gentleman isn't getting enough love. I am still waiting for a smaller version.
Exactly. I’d buy one of those in a second.
The 100m water resistance and Swiss brand are the selling points comparing to the Casio a1000
Are you nuts the Swiss can't touch G-Shock digital
@@greenerick you shouldn't compare them to each other just because they are digital watches 🤦 G-shock has an unique aesthetics
I don't know... Getting a lot of hate, but I think the 35mm stainless black dial is pretty sick.
The PRX for me someone with not that much of disposable income to throw onto watches was and still is an attractive offer in all other variants, however, I can't really justify it for a digital watch and yes you did make the comment on how the Casios in full metal variants are coming around that same price, but in that case it feels like you're getting the best version of that watch while this feels like getting a lesser version of the PRX... but that's my personal opinion and I wouldn't tell other people not to buy it, it's not a bad watch by any means
what the hell is even that 😂😂
I love it! I love my digital G-Shocks, but the full metal are not premium enough for what they cost. Meanwhile imo the PRX’s best feature is the bracelet so if I go with this I get a cool, retro digital with premium components.
The GMB2100 feels plenty premium and can be had now well under MSRP. I bough mine for $300 new and it feels great on the wrist, definitely worth the price
I keep coming back to this video, I want one so bad but I already have a rather vast collection of digital watches! I like the standard PRX a lot, and the digital is very nice! Like you pointed out it seems like great value, it's much cheaper than steel cased G-Shocks. Good quality steel digital watches are rare nowadays.
This type of watch has a spot in watch history. Not everyone likes it but in the 1970s this type of watch was like owning a robot. If you respected watch history you would not mind the watch. Its not everyones cup of tea but thats ok. I respect them for trying.
Shark Jumped.....
For 70's retro digital watches, the Hamilton PSR and Bulova Computron provide a much better retro feel.
Both of those releases mirror watches that actually existed in the 70's and early 80's. This release does not.
By the time LCD was released, almost no one was placing them in "round" faces.
Almost all early LCD watches mimicked the design adopted by Seiko when they finally released their first digital alarm chronograph which had the familiar "days of the week" listed at the top of the display with a little PIP that would highlight which day it was.
No one can argue the "quality" of the materials in this release, but it just doesn't look like anything that was actually being worn during that period, and it loses a lot the retro charm as a result.
A PSR can be had for under $800 retail, and depending on discounts all the way down to the mid $500's.
A Computron can be had for $100 less than the PRX.
And both of these outperform the PRX on the retro front.
I cant bring myself to pay over $500 for the PSR, but my Computron scratches that vintage digital watch itch quite nicely.
I hate to tell you but what you said is a bit off here. There were tons of digital watches in round cases throughout the 70s, it was quite popular. There was a vintage digital tissot that looked pretty much just like this one. A digital prx from 1975 more or less. They also sold rebranded Casiotrons, round ones too.
The psr and computron are great retro rereleases, but LED digitals were the style of the early 70s, LCD was the late 70s. It's unexpected but I applaud taking the risk.
I actually like these surprise releases. Affordable too, I might get one 🤔 as I’m actually not all that keen on the original analogue versions. As I by far prefer Christopher Ward’s 12 over the PRX. But this digital variation of the latter is right up my street.
Affordable? This is a Casio for $350...
@@jisezer350 is pretty affordable bub
Lmao watch guys like you are borderline delusional
@@jisezerhow is it?
@@jisezerbroke
People can dog on this all they want, but I personally think the style looks amazing.
I like it, just ordered one.
Not for me but glad to see a company trying "new" things.
It’s just exhausting at this point. Thanks to prx for ending this whole integrated bracelet craze for now.
love it! I bought one!
When's the gmt coming out?
All I wanted was a 37-38mm PRX :(
I second that.
What’s up with people wanting 3, 4 sizes of the same watch?
First world problems…🙄
@@e28forever30 I know right?! Why would you want to spend your hard earned money in a global economy that benefits everyone involved on a watch that actually fits you? What we should do is quit giving jobs to the people in the multitude of industries from mining, to engineering, to transportation, advertising and retail who are involved with this watch! We should just go back to hunting caribou with rocks. First world problems indeed.
All it needs is a moonswatch logo. Teddy's just powering on😂😂😂. What a trooper.
It's a premium digital watch. Just like premium/cheap analogue watches that people pay big money for if they want to.
I'd buy this if it had solar. There aren't great premium digital options. Casio needs a steel digital watch with solar and 100m water resistance that isn't a chunky g shock. The g shock squares are a classic because they are more wearable with a smaller size. The metal squares just seem overpriced. A metal rerelease of their older Marlins would be nice.
I'm not usually a fan of digital watches except a couple from Casio or if it has an analog face with it, but this one is really striking.
I absolutely love it, definitely getting one. Perfect retro goodness ❤❤ Great Review 💯❤️
You nuts when you can get a Gshock 😂😂
I don't know how to feel about this. I'm fine with premium digital watch, but i don't like the execution of PRX digital. A rectangular display on a round watch feels odd...
Still gonna wait for Casio to do a full metal, sapphire crystal, non-gshock, solar, wavecepter. A man can dream
I actually rate this, if someone really wants the functionality of a digital but wants a good quality steel and sapphire watch, this is a great option
Not for that price lol
@@Unlucky1776 do you think the standard PRX quartz analog is overpriced?
@@Joss1245 yes there’s no way I’d be caught dead paying for that lol
It will put people off the brand. It will 'Timex' it.
Perhaps more of a Accutime feel.
I was saving for a Telemeter, but now I’m just gonna wait.
Honestly, in spite of its thriftiness, Timex never really went too trashy or ridiculous. To me, this is one of the most unbalanced and incoherent watches I've ever seen.
I like the PRX surprise watch
This watch has my dad's name all over it!! Xmas present for sure
I think this piece is kind of cool. I could imagine the hipsters will love this one :-) but its not made for me right now. But it also ticks a lot of "remember my youth"- vibes.
The more i think about it the more i want it. It's the do it all watch. Dressy enough for situations I'd find myself in. Chronograph, timer, dual time zones, date function, sapphire, 100m of water resistance, minimal servicing costs.
Tissot: "Hey Casio, can I borrow your homework?"
Casio: "Yeah sure, just don't make it too obvious.."
I love my f91w, the black prx in 35 looks good.
I think the PRX digital is pretty cool, but I think G-Shocks are more worthy of the price tag because they’re more rugged and usually can have multiple alarms and time zones. Today they’re usually analog-digital too, which visually is something we’re more accustomed to.
Maybe this will grow more on me over time, but that’s my initial reaction. I’ll probably end up buying one as is though.
You're completely right
What a great idea from Tissot and as usual, an excellently done video.
no date on the main display of a digital watch ???
Just my opinion - this watch lowers the Tissot brand, they were killing it and then they came out with an expensive 70s department store watch. Everyone has different tastes which is great though. Hope they sell lots.
It's interesting, the PRX was sort of taking a downward dip anyway. If it sells (which it very well may) then it's a good move. Most companies exist to make money, not be tasteful.
Oh no. I love Casio A700WM for being extremely affordable (aka cheap), light (due to the materials used) and small. Tissot, why? The look of Digital PRX and MSRP are both quite... challenging and questionable, at least for my taste and subjective value assessment. These were my initial thoughts when I saw these new watches and their prices.
I like it. Reminds me of the Speedmaster LCD from the 70s
Nice but it would be ideal if it is solar powered and showing the date rather than have to press button to check the date.
Pretty much my reaction as I watched this…” I HATE them… wait I actually love these… or maybe I hate them.. but I actually really love these… I hate them that gold PVD is ridiculous… I also love and absolutely want to buy that gold PVD version..."
I’m really interested in this. A proper steel+sapphire digital with bracelet appeals to me. I think maybe the 40mm is a bit too blank looking and maybe the 35 is too small. I hope not. No microadjust is a pity but maybe not a deal breaker
Still coming back to this. I think with a rectangular display an octagonal case just looks better. This has sapphire glass and better water resistance than a casio so I’m still considering it
Looks like something SKMEI would come up with.
This is a great marketing trick. Since you need to get more young people to get interested in watches and wearing watches. Even though the price is not quite pocket money. Tissot allways has been a brand apealling to the younger audience. I am not that young anymore but I bought the gentleman when it came out and just love it. I really like the idea of the digital prx. Great move and great design. As I said for the younger audience. Well done Tissot.
Young people won’t be wearing this lol 😂
I believe that if they would have changed a little bit the case, making it more “rectangular” it would have been way cooler.
Is that actually betted than a Casio Fw91w? It looks home made.
Lots of Casio watches are better than the F91W, some even for the same price. This one’s just weird though
this is the first time I saw this style design TISSOT watch, surprised😮
Can't believe I'm thinking of dropping $400 on a watch just because I think it's funny.
Yes! I want one for all the wrong reasons. 😂
Video idea: best day date watches (please, I can't make up my mind)