For Edward, it seems like there was a mix of descriptions because his eyes definitely weren't blue-green as a vampire. I recall them being described as liquid gold but they turn black when he hasn't fed in a while. Maybe the blue-green was when he was human? In which case it makes sense. His skin is definitely pale though
@@laurendubosky Yeah, they even got the description of his human eyes wrong 😖 whoever wrote this description they clearly are not a Twilight fan because I read the books years ago and I still thought the description was off 😅 and I looked at Jazza's final art and I was like that don't look shit like Edward Cullen lol 🤣
To be honest I was thinking more Archie from the comics not Edward Cullen. I also read the books years ago and the discretion given is not right at all. Some parts but the eyes are definitely wrong.
For Edward, you were given the description for when he was a human. Once he was changed, his eyes were first red and then honey-colored as he began drinking animal blood. His features were also sharpened and his skin paled.
@@NOOBCRASTINATOR69 Okay, and?? Do you think before insulting people, or are you really just that mean? I get this is the internet and a lot of people get "brave" enough to disparage others because of the anonymity, but I am genuinely curious if you're this rude to people who are physically right in front of you. Either way, shame on you. I took maybe a minute of my life to interact with the creator about content that I really enjoyed, and you decided to spend your time insulting me for it. It looks like its you who needs to get a life.
What made the Monster in Frankenstein: The Modern Prometheus so terrible and terrifying wasn't just the grotesque appearance as opposed to the beauty that Frankenstein had planned, but the sheer intelligence of the Monster made him a sadistic and horrifying threat!
Everyone pretty much got it at the pink cardigan (unless you’ve never seen or read HP), when I knew was at the hair description with a bow, and it was obvious (if you’ve read the books) after the green tweed cloak with the green hat with flaps.
How about a new twist to this: let someone pick a celebrity and have them describe that person, then paint them following the description, show the picture to someone else again and let them guess who this is. Would love to see the results of that experiment!
@@pau_5435 Similar but not quite. Drawfee went more precise than that, telling the person drawing when to change things to make it more precise. I wish they'd had done it (and hope they do end up doing it) as described by Flomotion8000.
Literally started thinking of someone I could give a faithful vocal portrait and ended up desperate since I couldn't even depict my own parents I live with.
That’s interesting with the Frankenstein one. One thing they didn’t mention in the description they gave you (perhaps because it’s not said directly describing the monster) but Victor Frankenstein’s goal was to make an incredibly attractive person. Tall, long hair, bold features. So when the monster turned out horrific, it was in part the corrupted beauty (not just straight up hideousness) that made him particularly terrifying. Anyways, your monster was really neat! He wouldn’t have had a belly though, even being book accurate 😂
"I saw the dull yellow eye of the creature open. His limbs were in proportion, and I had selected his features as beautiful." The book also describes his hair as lustrous.
I vaguely remember the book saying that Harry thought Umbridge looked like a toad, that would have been a very important thing to add to the description because the drawing you made of Umbridge is a little different to when I read the book. Still a amazing job they all looked great!!
he did...also, now I see what people are saying when they say Rowling was obviously anti-trans because umbridge obviously looks like an unfortunate looking transwoman
Knew Sherlock almost instantly. He was always described as 'gaunt and eager' which is just such an odd pairing so I always remembered it. Watson always described Holmes so beautifully as if he were an angel
Isn't he associated with a deerstalker rather than a cloth cap, though? That part would have thrown me (had I guessed Sherlock Holmes, which I didn't 😂).
I was surprised I recognized Sherlock Holmes immediately from the description, since I've never read the books. Frankenstein's monster, while I never read that book either, makes more sense that I got it, because I've looked that up before. I thought Edward Cullen might by Percy Jackson, so it shows how much I didn't read either character's books.
My highschool senior year English class named Frankenstein's monster Jorge. I mentioned that it seemed a little mean to call him a monster and my whole class latched onto it and spend days coming up with a name. We even got out teacher to call him Jorge, I be it on accident.
Lol I was conflicted between Edward and Percy. What gave it away was "perfect". Percy is describes as troubled, so I would expect him to look like he's up to no good. No one would describe him as perfect appearance wise.
I've read Frankenstein recently for school, and I love how cursed your interpretation was the book description is way different from the pop culture, stitched together, with scars and neck bolts green zombie man. The monster's creator actually calls him beautiful
But then seconds later he is disgusted by his own creation and even later in the Book we learn that everyone who sees it is just scared and disgusted as well
@@quetzalcoatl9134 yeah, it has to do with the creepy yellow eyes as far as I know, as well as the disturbing macabre nature of Frankenstein's monster's appearance
@@quetzalcoatl9134 I interpreted the disgust that occurs as being an unsettling feeling that culminates as you watch the monster and see that he is unnatural and just wrong. At first glance, he is beautiful; Victor took his time, and specifically chose each part of him to create something beautiful, but the creation of the monster is just inherently wrong, and deeply unsettles anyone that see it.
As soon as I read black hair, grey eyes and wearing a cloth cap, I instantly knew it had to be Sherlock. Jazza guessing Count Olaf and Ebenezor Scrooge made me start doubting myself a bit lmao
it was "a 'thin, eager face' with a long thin nose" that clued me in and "cloth cap and tweed suit" confirmed it and Scrooge got me second guessing the same as you.
I thought the same initially, but the cloth cap threw me. I pictures what he actually drew, and thought it might be a Wodehouse character. But that would be a lot more obscure than any of these.
I am loving this series! It also makes me really curious how you would draw the Percy Jackson characters from their descriptions, so if you continue this series it would be really cool to see one (or more) of those.
I am far too pleased with myself for guessing Sherlock and Frankenstein out from their descriptions and the pictures Jazza drew, so well done there! You managed to not know where you were going and get the absolute correct vibe for these classic and oft-reinterpreted characters.
To be honest, I studied Frankenstein to much during my studies and I immediately recognized the description. It is like the better-known passage of the book, so I had it when you said "black lips". Mary Shelley you're an horror Queen.
Same! But his influence on it when he drew him as "fatter" with a big belly threw me a lot. Like first thought was interview with a vampire, then F's monster. But He definitely added in some v important details that weren't voiced in the description.
the first character really reminded me of the pigeon lady from home alone 2, the colour scheme is so similar too! I love the whole series, it's so creative and enjoyable to watch✨️
Confidentially guessed Umbridge, immediately guess Edward Cullen but then the more I thought about it the less I was convinced, had no idea with Frankenstein’s mister which confirms what Jazza was saying, knew it was Sherlock, and screamed that it was Jazza till the reveal.. haha this was fun I love this series!
Hey Jazza! You'll probably never read this but I've been a big fan of yours since forever. I've been more of a silent watcher but I just wanted to acknowledge the hard work and effort you put behind your videos to make them entertaining for us. I really admire the fact that you stand by what you stand for, yanno. And just know that we support you and are always left amazed by your artistic abilities. :)
These descriptions are missing just a bit that would've really steered you in the right direction more. Like Frankenstein's monster is specifically beautiful with overblown proportions because Victor was trying to create a beautiful creature and thought he succeeded until the monster woke up and uncanny valley sunk in. And Edward is most definitely described as pale indeed, with gold/amber/black colored eyes depending on when he'd fed.
Yeah! From what I remember reading, I thought Frankenstein’s monster was supposed to be muscular as well! He wasn’t working with very thorough descriptions
I love that you’re blindly drawing these characters from their book descriptions, they look awesome and exactly how similarly we’d imagine what they’d look like
Can you do a video with book characters adding details about their personality? For example, Umbridge is described as "irritating" in the book, and Edward is "distant". You could do it by using descriptions of their tones: Edward does not actually smile but "chuckle" (that word literally comes up 25 times per page). It would be so fun to see how the personality affects the appearance :)
When you drew Edward and made the shorter parts of his hair darker, I- you can literally see in yourself next to your drawing, having the same haircut and since the hair is shorter and the skin is peaking through, short/buzzed hair appears lighter than longer hair, because it doesn’t throw shadows on itself.
Knew sherlock right off the bat. Just from the "gaunt, eager face and bushy eyebrows" part. Ive read ALOT of sherlock holmes stories 🤣🤣 guessed Frankensteins monster pretty fast too. I was surprised when you drew the belly being so big though, that threw me off for a moment and I started to wonder if I was wrong but I kept going back to the thin black lips part and just knew it had to be the monster. As a bookworm I really enjoy watching these videos and think it would be cool if this became a longer series
I felt like he did it to throw us off for catching on too fast cuz he guessed it right away and then realized if he did it would have to look more "classic monstery". Nowhere was described extra weight or a cartoonish vest and tiny buffoonish head- just a tall frame, obviously expecting proportionate sized head.
This is the first time I've watched Jazza in over a year. Me and my (super toxic) ex used to watch Jazza together and I finally was able to come back without feeling triggered. Jazza is just to amazing to forget. I love you, Jazza!! I missed you 💔
The Frankenstein one was very easy for me, mostly cause I recently rewatched a video on the original story. He's actually described as being generally fairly good looking, iirc, apart from you know, having yellowed skin and visible arteries and really creepy eyes. But his teeth and proportions are nice!
00:01 no man i thank you not all movies adapted the accurate character look and not even ai can generate them perfectly it is hard for us reader when they do it completely wrong when even the slightest change are noticeable to us❤
@@shramanamondal4624 I remember that interview! But I believe the Twilight series was based on how he looked later, like in Count of Monte Cristo. He thinned out quite a bit by then, tho I would love to see what chubby Henry looked like 😆
You just blew my mind, and my brothers who also love that movie. That's one of our family favorites and we never even realised that the kid is the same actor that we have New favorite movies from.
@Juno Antares YAAAAAASSS That's one of my faves too! I was also slow to catch on to who he was until way later. It didn't dawn on me until he did that Immortals movie and I never watched The Tudors 😅
Since you started doing these and she's been doing them for a while, I'd love to see you and Lavendertowne do a collab versus type video on drawing characters based on book descriptions. I think yall would work well together.
I'm guessing the last one is Frankensteins monster, based on victorian era and disproportionate body (which could just mean a longer torso or arms compared to expectations); but he's described as incredibly beautiful, eerily so. So I can be way off the mark. Edit: woohoo I was right! hahaha. I think the part of unnatural beauty is missing from the description. He's supposed to give an uncanny valley sort of feel, even though he looks really good. Because Frankenstein wanted to create a "perfect" new lifeform, but it goes against the nature and ended up creating a monstrosity in a human shell. (I mean we can argue all day who the monster is in the books, but Adam looks the part)
The monster never had a name because names humanise someone. The monster was constantly reminded he was no human. The name Prometheus is from the novels original name. The modern Prometheus in reference to the Greek myth of Prometheus who stole fire from the gods and gave it to humans.
@@coralhughes1920 It's been ages since I read the book, and for some reason in my mind I remember him calling himself Adam at some point... Okay, I did a quick wiki (yes, shame on me), and it seems like he did say something along the lines of "I ought to be thy Adam" to Victor. I took it as a name.
i love that i immediately recognized the description of the creature the second i heard “pearly white teeth” and “yellow skin”, so to see ur unknowing drawing of the creature is so fun to me, i love how you went about it it’s fascinating
I thought Sherlock right away and was so happy I got it right, I always pictured him nobler and less aged, but maybe it doesn't describe him like that.
I think people today are just conditioned to think every protagonist has to be a tall, muscular Chad due to hollywood casting choices, when in fact many books were written with fairly average people in mind, and in reality most heroes are not supermodels, or they'd be modeling instead of hero-ing.
part of it is that you drew pre-vamp edward, bc vamp edward IS pale and causes the uncanny-valley effect in humans bc of their general "otherness," "humans can tell that they're not" or whatever, and, particularly, vamps have either red eyes (human-eaters), black eyes (hungry), or gold/amber eyes (animal-eaters), human ed had the blue green, but that is from edward's (or Carlisle's??) own admission, bella never actually saw him and described him herself
And also it says modern setting which means whoever made the description messed up cuz if it was his human form it would be long ago. And the eyes were green not blue green. And he was lanky compared to his brothers but when Bella saw him alone she realized he wasn’t lanky. Whoever wrote the description got it off
Yeah I feel like for the movie they're like "they have to know he's a vampire. He should look vampirish " but the book is more like "he should believably be able to pass for a regular highschool student."
Wow! I really like your art style! As someone who's always drawn outside in, so to say, I love watching artists who start with the base colouring and work their way out. It's a really interesting technique... I'd love to try it! I think you're very talented!! But, whoever gave you the description for Edward missed the mark. They seem to be taking descriptions from when Edward was human and as a vampire. In the books Bella describes Edward (and the rest of the Cullens) as having pale white skin and golden eyes - with her descriptions for Edward's eyes adding more detail like liquid amber, and warm butterscotch. His eyes are green as a human, and he'd have a warmer skin tone too. As a vampire they are described as being "almost unnaturally white".... maybe your team thought those descriptors would make it too easy for you to guess who it was?. Still, it did a disservice to you and your version of Edward (Edward would never wear a letterman jacket)..... perhaps you could revisit Edward and do a second version that's more true to his vampire nature?
I have long thought that it would be fascinating to see how people would illustrate Tolkein's work, uninfluenced by all the adaptations. This video is fun to see, even if it is with other well-known characters.
I have been really getting into learning digital painting recently so the brush pack has really came at a fantastic time. I just finished my first fully digital painting using it and I'm honestly so blown away by the whole package. Has to be the best investment I've made in a LONG time! So thank you to everyone involved, so much
I loved seeing your interpretation of The Creature from Mary Shelley's _Frankenstein._ I knew who it was from the description straight away (since I'm an English instructor, and I default to _Frankenstein_ when I have to teach how to analyze a literary work), and it was a delight to see how befuddled you were when you put together this smiling strange character. Ahh, he looks like how he could've been had Victor spent one millisecond welcoming The Creature into the world rather than running out of the house to hide in the courtyard until morning... But then we wouldn't get the court case, framing for murder, and the chase through the Arctic, so....sacrifices, sacrifices. Great video!
You painted the human Edward :P his looks before turning were described once in the series. Bella really wanted their kid to have his green eyes. But the after look was accurate in the movie lol
Ooh, I'd love to see you do some of Jane Austen's characters! I know the descriptions aren't always that detailed, but it'd still be cool. Dickens has some excellent descriptions of characters in his stories.
I think your creators missed the mark on Edward. Like all the vampires in the Twilight series, Edward is described as being impossibly beautiful. At various points in the series, Bella compares him to the mythical Greek god Adonis. His skin is "like marble"-very pale, rock hard, ice cold, and sparkles in the sunlight.
It was human version - with green eyes, that was depicted. Not his vampire self. But, it kept me and him guessing until the last minute because we both kept saying no, then scratching that guess only to go right back to it. But, through out, I kept Edward in the back of my head - but at the human version. The vampire version is repeated referenced, but the human version is rarely referenced, even in the books. So, I like that the human version was the one that was mentioned in the challenge. Something just little different, but still popular!
@@KhaozVoid Honestly, Vampmeyers don't sparkle, either. That is just how Bella described then, but she got it wrong. Or rather, Stephenie Meyer didn't specify correctly. However, she fixed it in Midnight Sun. The facets of their skin refract light, like a prism. With many colors bouncing off them, they actually looks like they are on fire. Refract, not sparkle, LOL!
I needed this today it's super early here in America and I'm awake bc anxiety sucks jazz is the best medicine to try and calm down!! Edited to say I've read twilight a lot (millennial don't judge) and knew instantly it was Edward and what u drew was what I used to picture in my head until the movies came out ur amazing
I discovered your channel when your first Painting Characters video showed up in my feed. Still one of my favourite videos to this day. Super cool to see you do another!
The first one, I immediately thought it was a Harry Potter character, especially when you said wizard. Second one, I knew right away it was Sherlock Holmes as soon as I saw the description of a tweed suit. Third one, without looking at the comments, I probably would have guessed Edward. I did not figure out the last two. This is my first time watching one of your videos and it was pretty cool. I am amazed by digital artists. It seems too complicated to me. I just like my paper and pencils and the simplicity of it.
I love this series. When you said toad, black velvet bow and pink cardigan I knew it was umbridge. Also, I thought of Edward Cullen, Percy Jackson or maybe Jason grace for the Edward one, I don’t know why I guess it’s just my own fan girl instincts. You should definitely do some Percy Jackson characters. I mean, the adaptations (movies) were the least accurate you can be, and the show is not focusing on appearance being accurate, whereas the plot and the essence and personality of characters. Even if there’s pretty accurate fan art, it would be really cool to see your way of doing some characters, since some changes are made in fan art. I definitely want to see that
I also thought that it was Jason grace or Luke Castellen but it never said anything about a scar on his eye and with the perfect 17 year old and the blue green eyes fits Percy so I also thought of him as well
I think the only accurate depiction I've seen is the cover by Kamil Vojnar for the 1998 edition by Bantam Doubleday. If he's never read the novel, Erik's description is definitely going to throw him for a loop.
I knew the next to last one. There isn't many other choices. I really enjoy these "Painting characters EXACTLY as described in the book" videos. a lot. They are part drawing and a bit of trivia.
@@tiasmith3499 The Frankenstein in the movies didn't exactly match up with the book's description. Shrek is based on a book. A teenage Shrek might fit too. He just went bald and his skin might've darkened as he got older.
I am not an artist, I don´t draw at all, but I really *love* this series. Maybe because I am a game master in P&P and very often have to make up people in my mind on the fly and describe them so everybody has a picture in their heads. This series is amazing. It feels as if I re-live the process my players experience in their heads when I am doing my best to fill all those people with life. Thank you for this. And btw: some of your characters are *way* better than the movie-depictions. Not only in this video. In my youth I did a lot of acting at university, for instance Mary Shelleys Frankenstein. Since I am very tall, I was (you guessed it, right?) the Monster. My long hair was full of mud and hanging down in strains from me. When I saw you drawing the monsters hair I was like "yeah, just like me back then" in my head. And i thought it was only an idea of the regisseur :D
I actually like that the person gave him Edward's human description, I know I know, the eyes were the wrong color, but it's cool to see "Hey, this might be how Edward would look as a human in our time".
Hey Jezza, really awesome painting of the different characters. Whoever sent in the discretion of Edward was trying to throw you off guessing who he was, because it would have been more obvious you where drawing Edward if they said he had golden eyes. Edward’s eyes are usually described as golden as a vampire, but they do change colours the more time that passes between when he’s last hunted, gradually turning black indicating that he’s thirsty and it’s been too long since he’s gone hunting. As a human Edward actually had green eyes. In the books Bella has described his Edward’s eyes as turning butterscotch and topaz (which is probably the colour that the person who gave you the discretion was describing to you). In fact in Twilight (the first book) there’s a moment where Bella and Edward are talking as he’s driving her home from school, and he’s asking her questions about herself to get to know her, at one point Edward asks Bella what her favourite gemstone is and she responds with topaz simply because it’s the colour of his eyes that day. Bella notes that she said topaz automatically without thinking because she was looking in his eyes, and her actual favourite gemstone is garnet.
I thought Gaston... not Frankenstein's Monster, thinking maybe they just cropped his hair in the movie adaptation. But it was interesting to see you basically equate gigantic = massive beer belly 😆
Yeah, I was thinking either very tall and muscled, or tall and built like someone who does a lot of physical labour, you know, very square and stocky without the shortness I guess?
I actually really love this I thought you were going to know the character and then get a description and remake them but it turns out you had no idea any of them at all and went only by description and that's super fantastic
I think people get Edwards looks wrong. Twilight is written from Bellas perspective and she was madly in love with him. So Edwards description was very tainted by Bellas positive opinion of him.
vampires in that universe are supposed to be utterly beautiful to humans as a means of attracting "dinner". everyone in that universe found all the Cullens insanely attractive.
@@mxloverman2898 Well, all Cullens are very much above average (especially when you consider Edward is 17 (have you looked at actual 17 year olds?) but Belas exaggerated view of Edward is what I was getting at
And Edward didn't consider himself beautiful. He considered himself flawed and monstrous. The exaggerated features (given to make them more appealing to their meals) seen as groteqsue and embarrassing. When Rob Pattinson did the role, he read Twilight for Bella's "perfect" version. Then he read the draft of Midnight Sun for Edward's "flawed" version, then worked with a compromise that was found somewhere in the middle. Both in looks, composure, and personality, and character to find the real Edward himself.
I love these videos. please do more. I love guessing along and sometimes your drawing helps alot. not with Frankensteins monster but Mist of the time you are close to the original. I love this format. I really hope you'll do more.❤
I absolutely loved Frankenstein's creature, mostly because we got to draw him by the book for an English class back in my Sophomore year. As soon as I read his description, I immediately started losing my shit bouncing up and down with joy and excitement to see what Jazza would conjure up. I was crunched for time when I made mine, so I cut corners by depicting him wearing the cloak he finds, which actually helped me tremendously in getting a haunted look in his eyes by covering half his face with hair from the clock's hood being pulled up.
Hi jazza, you've made me so much more confident about my art. I made a business about a year ago, and it never took off, then I had remembered one day, that I watched you ALL the time, just a few months ago. I started watching again, and it made me more confident of my art. You are an inspiration, jazza. Tysm 🤍🤍🤍
Man I was so stoked when I read the description for Frankenstein's creature (I will not call him a monster), I've read the book twice so I knew it immediately when seeing the gigantic height and yellow skin, and the Victorian setting just cemented it haha
It had me thinking Phantom of the Opera cuz while he isn’t tall he’s yellow with his nose falling off his face and he needs a full mask not the typical half mask
@@karenalynne The Creature looks more like a goofy troll, rather than the eloquent, articulate person from the book. He would not have had his belly showing either. Also, the 'Victorian setting' is incorrect. Frankenstein was published in 1818, the year before Victoria was born.
I just found your channel recently and I just want to say thank you for something fun, with all the negativity on the internet this is a breath of fresh air
When you read the description of the Frankenstein monster, I instantly had to think about its portrayal in "Penny Dreadful" and I literally laughed out loud when you said it was the monster!!! Awseome. I immediately recognised the characters by their description. Love this format XD
I enjoyed this very much LOL As a writer, I think this video showcased the pitfall of dumping too many adjectives and descriptors all together. When readers try making sense of so much info all at one it gets hard and then every reader imagines something different.
God seeing you draw lights a fire in me. In December 2023 my first book will be published, and with how awesome your drawings are it makes me want to see my characters in real life. Sadly, while I can write stories, I can't really draw anymore lol.
In the book, bella said the the skin of the Cullens are paler than hers, and edward doesn't have blue-green eyes, He has golden eyes. But he had green eyes when he was still a human.
🥳 Check out my BRAND NEW - ULTIMATE Digital Painting Bundle/Brushes! www.jazzastudios.com/pages/shop - your support means the world to me!!
HOW IS THIS IS 2 DAYS AGO
@@Cold_hotmanyoutubes drunk again
PLEASE make those brushes available in Russia! Currently I only know XSOLLA to work with international payment! Plz I'm crying...
I really like the Harry Potter characters could you please do professor moody and lord Valtimort or maybe even Dumbledore
Do these brushes work on Corel Painter?
For Edward, it seems like there was a mix of descriptions because his eyes definitely weren't blue-green as a vampire. I recall them being described as liquid gold but they turn black when he hasn't fed in a while. Maybe the blue-green was when he was human? In which case it makes sense. His skin is definitely pale though
Yeah the person who sent the description totally didn't get it right. lol 😂
Yeah, the blue green was strange, because I know his human eye color was never described as blue green, just green.
@@laurendubosky Yeah, they even got the description of his human eyes wrong 😖 whoever wrote this description they clearly are not a Twilight fan because I read the books years ago and I still thought the description was off 😅 and I looked at Jazza's final art and I was like that don't look shit like Edward Cullen lol 🤣
By the way do either of you got Instagram so I can follow you? I want to make Twilight friends lol 🤣
To be honest I was thinking more Archie from the comics not Edward Cullen. I also read the books years ago and the discretion given is not right at all. Some parts but the eyes are definitely wrong.
For Edward, you were given the description for when he was a human. Once he was changed, his eyes were first red and then honey-colored as he began drinking animal blood. His features were also sharpened and his skin paled.
He's fictional.. get a life bruh
@@NOOBCRASTINATOR69 bruh what? They just explained the difference lmao why are you so triggered 💀💀goofy
Oh that explains it! That is a good memory.
So, the movie depiction IS accurate to some degree.
@@NOOBCRASTINATOR69 Okay, and?? Do you think before insulting people, or are you really just that mean? I get this is the internet and a lot of people get "brave" enough to disparage others because of the anonymity, but I am genuinely curious if you're this rude to people who are physically right in front of you. Either way, shame on you.
I took maybe a minute of my life to interact with the creator about content that I really enjoyed, and you decided to spend your time insulting me for it. It looks like its you who needs to get a life.
Love how the challenge was to draw the "perfect" teenage boy and you drew yourself haha
Ikr hahahah 🤣
ROFL Yes!
Where was this draw?
@@pedro6720 the drawing of Edward
that was the joke well done, you don't have to tell everyone u found it funny..as it was a joke....
Your reaction to drawing Frankenstein’s Creature was hilariously similar to Frankenstein’s reaction to creating The Creature in the first place.
S tier comment
As a gothic literature fan I adore this comment.
He accidentally drew Corpsegrinder from Cannibal Corpse
That's exactly what I was thinking
What made the Monster in Frankenstein: The Modern Prometheus so terrible and terrifying wasn't just the grotesque appearance as opposed to the beauty that Frankenstein had planned, but the sheer intelligence of the Monster made him a sadistic and horrifying threat!
"You can see where I'm going with this"
No Jazza, we cannot 🙃
I knew it was umbridge from the curly hair part, I still don’t know if it is but I’m pretty sure
YES IT WAS!
I mean it was obviously Umbridge, and mentioning wizard cloak was also very direct, unless you've never seen Harry Potter, then it's understandable.
Everyone pretty much got it at the pink cardigan (unless you’ve never seen or read HP), when I knew was at the hair description with a bow, and it was obvious (if you’ve read the books) after the green tweed cloak with the green hat with flaps.
Exactly! Shame they didn’t go with ‘frog faced’😂
How about a new twist to this: let someone pick a celebrity and have them describe that person, then paint them following the description, show the picture to someone else again and let them guess who this is. Would love to see the results of that experiment!
I believe Drawfee have done something of the sort
@@pau_5435 Similar but not quite. Drawfee went more precise than that, telling the person drawing when to change things to make it more precise. I wish they'd had done it (and hope they do end up doing it) as described by Flomotion8000.
literally just described gartic phone lmao
im up for it
Literally started thinking of someone I could give a faithful vocal portrait and ended up desperate since I couldn't even depict my own parents I live with.
That’s interesting with the Frankenstein one. One thing they didn’t mention in the description they gave you (perhaps because it’s not said directly describing the monster) but Victor Frankenstein’s goal was to make an incredibly attractive person. Tall, long hair, bold features. So when the monster turned out horrific, it was in part the corrupted beauty (not just straight up hideousness) that made him particularly terrifying. Anyways, your monster was really neat! He wouldn’t have had a belly though, even being book accurate 😂
That concept does sound somehow more terrifying than just a straight up ugly monster
"I saw the dull yellow eye of the creature open. His limbs were in proportion, and I had selected his features as beautiful."
The book also describes his hair as lustrous.
Yeah, I remember the description as being beautiful but with weird eyes and jaundiced skin.
I remember this, but I just now am thinking, did Vicky intend to make a hot guy in a boastful way or a Rocky Horror way?
lynd ward made a woodblock print of Frankenstein and i think it is a much more accurate depiction of the monster
I vaguely remember the book saying that Harry thought Umbridge looked like a toad, that would have been a very important thing to add to the description because the drawing you made of Umbridge is a little different to when I read the book. Still a amazing job they all looked great!!
he did...also, now I see what people are saying when they say Rowling was obviously anti-trans because umbridge obviously looks like an unfortunate looking transwoman
Yes, the description of the wide flabby mouth is very important
Knew Sherlock almost instantly. He was always described as 'gaunt and eager' which is just such an odd pairing so I always remembered it. Watson always described Holmes so beautifully as if he were an angel
Yeah, I have no idea who Count Olaf is but to me the description was pretty clearly Holmes.
I do know who Count Olaf is and I never thought it was him. I knew it was Holmes as soon as he started drawing.
Isn't he associated with a deerstalker rather than a cloth cap, though? That part would have thrown me (had I guessed Sherlock Holmes, which I didn't 😂).
@@suntrespasser9684 he is, but it's described in a few different ways over the series
@@suntrespasser9684 Apparently that’s just something popular from a play he was portrayed in and not his common fashion.
I was surprised I recognized Sherlock Holmes immediately from the description, since I've never read the books. Frankenstein's monster, while I never read that book either, makes more sense that I got it, because I've looked that up before.
I thought Edward Cullen might by Percy Jackson, so it shows how much I didn't read either character's books.
Edward is in the thumbnail it was pretty obvious which one he was describing but ok.
My highschool senior year English class named Frankenstein's monster Jorge. I mentioned that it seemed a little mean to call him a monster and my whole class latched onto it and spend days coming up with a name. We even got out teacher to call him Jorge, I be it on accident.
Glad I wasn’t the only one who thought Percy Jackson
Lol I was conflicted between Edward and Percy. What gave it away was "perfect". Percy is describes as troubled, so I would expect him to look like he's up to no good. No one would describe him as perfect appearance wise.
Yeah I also thought Percy Jackson because idk Edward just didn’t feel right even though I knew it wasn’t Percy
I've read Frankenstein recently for school, and I love how cursed your interpretation was
the book description is way different from the pop culture, stitched together, with scars and neck bolts green zombie man. The monster's creator actually calls him beautiful
But then seconds later he is disgusted by his own creation and even later in the Book we learn that everyone who sees it is just scared and disgusted as well
@@quetzalcoatl9134 yea, you know, then the monster kills his family, gets mad bc everyone hates him and then they kill each other 😅😅
@@quetzalcoatl9134 yeah, it has to do with the creepy yellow eyes as far as I know, as well as the disturbing macabre nature of Frankenstein's monster's appearance
@@quetzalcoatl9134 I interpreted the disgust that occurs as being an unsettling feeling that culminates as you watch the monster and see that he is unnatural and just wrong. At first glance, he is beautiful; Victor took his time, and specifically chose each part of him to create something beautiful, but the creation of the monster is just inherently wrong, and deeply unsettles anyone that see it.
@@yvettenicole1266 yes, thank you, someone who's actually read the book
As soon as I read black hair, grey eyes and wearing a cloth cap, I instantly knew it had to be Sherlock. Jazza guessing Count Olaf and Ebenezor Scrooge made me start doubting myself a bit lmao
it was "a 'thin, eager face' with a long thin nose" that clued me in and "cloth cap and tweed suit" confirmed it and Scrooge got me second guessing the same as you.
It’s definitely SH, I didn’t have second thoughts. But the one he drew was more like the characters he thought…
I immediately thought the same xD
The description doesn't say anything about him having that goofy grin.
I thought the same initially, but the cloth cap threw me. I pictures what he actually drew, and thought it might be a Wodehouse character. But that would be a lot more obscure than any of these.
That's going to be my new thing. Calling up random contacts, asking them an absurd question, saying "HA!!" and then hanging up without explanation.
I am loving this series! It also makes me really curious how you would draw the Percy Jackson characters from their descriptions, so if you continue this series it would be really cool to see one (or more) of those.
i'm drawing Percy right now, lol.
I was thinking of Percy Jackson while he was drawing Edward
@@alessandrahayes8544 same. I said, if that’s not Edward than it has to be Percy! This video was so much fun.
Yeah I'd like to see Rick's universe after that disaster of a movie
I was thinking the exact same thing because that movie completely miscast the characters
I am far too pleased with myself for guessing Sherlock and Frankenstein out from their descriptions and the pictures Jazza drew, so well done there! You managed to not know where you were going and get the absolute correct vibe for these classic and oft-reinterpreted characters.
Professor Umbridge was missing the tweed and it totally changed the era it felt like she was from. That lady looked more like a hobbit.
Also in the book she was described as looking like a frog
@@AtomLil Damn, sounds like he nailed it then
Honestly I agree with that but I feel like I really liked the movie version too
shes also described as a toad or frog
@@AtomLil That was the what defined her the most
To be honest, I studied Frankenstein to much during my studies and I immediately recognized the description. It is like the better-known passage of the book, so I had it when you said "black lips". Mary Shelley you're an horror Queen.
All I could think was goth shrek while he was drawing 😂
Same! But his influence on it when he drew him as "fatter" with a big belly threw me a lot. Like first thought was interview with a vampire, then F's monster. But He definitely added in some v important details that weren't voiced in the description.
same, the "victorian era" was a clue in for it too. :)
When it said yellow skin I suddenly knew
@@sarahvp2003 Frankenstein (s' monster) wasn't Victorian tho. The book actually was set in the 18th century
"You're not supposed to ___, but I was having so much fun that I just kept going" is some grade A wholesome. Starting the day off right
I enjoy these sessions alot, the creative process and character....guessing.... is too fun. Great video and I'm not even at the halfway point yet.
the first character really reminded me of the pigeon lady from home alone 2, the colour scheme is so similar too!
I love the whole series, it's so creative and enjoyable to watch✨️
Confidentially guessed Umbridge, immediately guess Edward Cullen but then the more I thought about it the less I was convinced, had no idea with Frankenstein’s mister which confirms what Jazza was saying, knew it was Sherlock, and screamed that it was Jazza till the reveal.. haha this was fun I love this series!
I thought the edward one was cedric diggory
I saw "pink" and "curly, brown hair" and immediately went *"DOLORES F U C K I N G UMBRIDGE!"*
@@jenniferwilcox7021 its the same actor
Hey Jazza! You'll probably never read this but I've been a big fan of yours since forever. I've been more of a silent watcher but I just wanted to acknowledge the hard work and effort you put behind your videos to make them entertaining for us. I really admire the fact that you stand by what you stand for, yanno. And just know that we support you and are always left amazed by your artistic abilities. :)
RUclips Comments be like :
RUclips comment be like:
RUclips comments be like:
RUclips Comments be like :
yes
These descriptions are missing just a bit that would've really steered you in the right direction more. Like Frankenstein's monster is specifically beautiful with overblown proportions because Victor was trying to create a beautiful creature and thought he succeeded until the monster woke up and uncanny valley sunk in. And Edward is most definitely described as pale indeed, with gold/amber/black colored eyes depending on when he'd fed.
Yeah! From what I remember reading, I thought Frankenstein’s monster was supposed to be muscular as well! He wasn’t working with very thorough descriptions
And Professor Umbridge was supposed to have tweed and her face was supposed to look like a toad😅 the description they gave was more hobbit esque.
I love that you’re blindly drawing these characters from their book descriptions, they look awesome and exactly how similarly we’d imagine what they’d look like
Can you do a video with book characters adding details about their personality? For example, Umbridge is described as "irritating" in the book, and Edward is "distant". You could do it by using descriptions of their tones: Edward does not actually smile but "chuckle" (that word literally comes up 25 times per page). It would be so fun to see how the personality affects the appearance :)
When you drew Edward and made the shorter parts of his hair darker, I- you can literally see in yourself next to your drawing, having the same haircut and since the hair is shorter and the skin is peaking through, short/buzzed hair appears lighter than longer hair, because it doesn’t throw shadows on itself.
Knew sherlock right off the bat. Just from the "gaunt, eager face and bushy eyebrows" part. Ive read ALOT of sherlock holmes stories 🤣🤣 guessed Frankensteins monster pretty fast too. I was surprised when you drew the belly being so big though, that threw me off for a moment and I started to wonder if I was wrong but I kept going back to the thin black lips part and just knew it had to be the monster. As a bookworm I really enjoy watching these videos and think it would be cool if this became a longer series
Same! The description screamed Sherlock to me 😀
I felt the same about how he added his own "rotundness" to Frankenstein's monster.
I quickly got the hint about Sherlock too
I felt like he did it to throw us off for catching on too fast cuz he guessed it right away and then realized if he did it would have to look more "classic monstery". Nowhere was described extra weight or a cartoonish vest and tiny buffoonish head- just a tall frame, obviously expecting proportionate sized head.
Same with Sherlock!!
Ever notice how drawing from imagination brings gradient shading whereas drawing from a reference entails more random, naturally realistic shading?
This just turned into a challenge of how often jazza can mention his brushes in one video
That would be an awesome drinking game
@@amberves1594that sounds like a great way to get alcohol poisoning.
This is the first time I've watched Jazza in over a year. Me and my (super toxic) ex used to watch Jazza together and I finally was able to come back without feeling triggered. Jazza is just to amazing to forget. I love you, Jazza!! I missed you 💔
The Frankenstein one was very easy for me, mostly cause I recently rewatched a video on the original story. He's actually described as being generally fairly good looking, iirc, apart from you know, having yellowed skin and visible arteries and really creepy eyes. But his teeth and proportions are nice!
It was easy for me too because I’m literally reading and studying that book right now lol
00:01 no man i thank you not all movies adapted the accurate character look and not even ai can generate them perfectly it is hard for us reader when they do it completely wrong when even the slightest change are noticeable to us❤
As someone who mainly does digital it's so cool to see jazza digital paint! Digital painting illudes me so I'm low key taking notes
I would love to see Jazza draw warrior cats based of either their book or wiki descriptions.
Keep up the great work!
ACCORDING TO THE WARRIOR CATS WIKI…
Lmao this would be so much fun XD
Yesss omg
Warrior Cats... Those books were my life when I was a kid
@@ScarlettBlack_Zucchini Same with me. That’s why I would love to see Jazza draw some of the characters
OMG YES!!!
Honestly, my respect to Rob Pat for playing a character he hated lol
I remember reading that Edward's description was based on Henry Cavill in his teen years 🥰
Well Henry Cavill wasn't a hottie in his teen years, he revealed in one of his interviews probably with Graham Norton.
@@shramanamondal4624 I remember that interview! But I believe the Twilight series was based on how he looked later, like in Count of Monte Cristo. He thinned out quite a bit by then, tho I would love to see what chubby Henry looked like 😆
Pretty sure he was based on Gerard way lol.
You just blew my mind, and my brothers who also love that movie. That's one of our family favorites and we never even realised that the kid is the same actor that we have New favorite movies from.
@Juno Antares YAAAAAASSS That's one of my faves too! I was also slow to catch on to who he was until way later. It didn't dawn on me until he did that Immortals movie and I never watched The Tudors 😅
Since you started doing these and she's been doing them for a while, I'd love to see you and Lavendertowne do a collab versus type video on drawing characters based on book descriptions. I think yall would work well together.
Oooooo! Yes! That would be so fun!
great idea!
I doubt because he still hasn’t shoutouted her
@@Boxofcare666 that's kinda disappointing tbh
I thought that that’s what this was? I saw the thumbnail and immediately thought of her videos lol
I'm guessing the last one is Frankensteins monster, based on victorian era and disproportionate body (which could just mean a longer torso or arms compared to expectations); but he's described as incredibly beautiful, eerily so. So I can be way off the mark.
Edit: woohoo I was right! hahaha. I think the part of unnatural beauty is missing from the description. He's supposed to give an uncanny valley sort of feel, even though he looks really good. Because Frankenstein wanted to create a "perfect" new lifeform, but it goes against the nature and ended up creating a monstrosity in a human shell. (I mean we can argue all day who the monster is in the books, but Adam looks the part)
Adam? I think the name of Frankenstein’s monster was Prometheus…
@@meganjaime7728 he didn’t have a name, originally at least
The monster never had a name because names humanise someone. The monster was constantly reminded he was no human. The name Prometheus is from the novels original name. The modern Prometheus in reference to the Greek myth of Prometheus who stole fire from the gods and gave it to humans.
@@coralhughes1920 It's been ages since I read the book, and for some reason in my mind I remember him calling himself Adam at some point...
Okay, I did a quick wiki (yes, shame on me), and it seems like he did say something along the lines of "I ought to be thy Adam" to Victor. I took it as a name.
@@easternhills1329 ah, I’m not far into the book so I haven’t seen that part yet. :)
i love that i immediately recognized the description of the creature the second i heard “pearly white teeth” and “yellow skin”, so to see ur unknowing drawing of the creature is so fun to me, i love how you went about it it’s fascinating
I thought Sherlock right away and was so happy I got it right, I always pictured him nobler and less aged, but maybe it doesn't describe him like that.
Remember he’s a casual opium user, so that’s going to take some toll on his body.
@@dubbingsync opium and cocaine occasionally
@@dubbingsync Quite true, and his smoking habit isn't doing any favours.
@@dubbingsync loved the result, he definitely looks like someone who does copious amounts of coke lol
I think people today are just conditioned to think every protagonist has to be a tall, muscular Chad due to hollywood casting choices, when in fact many books were written with fairly average people in mind, and in reality most heroes are not supermodels, or they'd be modeling instead of hero-ing.
part of it is that you drew pre-vamp edward, bc vamp edward IS pale and causes the uncanny-valley effect in humans bc of their general "otherness," "humans can tell that they're not" or whatever, and, particularly, vamps have either red eyes (human-eaters), black eyes (hungry), or gold/amber eyes (animal-eaters), human ed had the blue green, but that is from edward's (or Carlisle's??) own admission, bella never actually saw him and described him herself
And also it says modern setting which means whoever made the description messed up cuz if it was his human form it would be long ago. And the eyes were green not blue green. And he was lanky compared to his brothers but when Bella saw him alone she realized he wasn’t lanky. Whoever wrote the description got it off
Yeah I feel like for the movie they're like "they have to know he's a vampire. He should look vampirish " but the book is more like "he should believably be able to pass for a regular highschool student."
Wow! I really like your art style! As someone who's always drawn outside in, so to say, I love watching artists who start with the base colouring and work their way out. It's a really interesting technique... I'd love to try it! I think you're very talented!!
But, whoever gave you the description for Edward missed the mark. They seem to be taking descriptions from when Edward was human and as a vampire. In the books Bella describes Edward (and the rest of the Cullens) as having pale white skin and golden eyes - with her descriptions for Edward's eyes adding more detail like liquid amber, and warm butterscotch. His eyes are green as a human, and he'd have a warmer skin tone too. As a vampire they are described as being "almost unnaturally white".... maybe your team thought those descriptors would make it too easy for you to guess who it was?. Still, it did a disservice to you and your version of Edward (Edward would never wear a letterman jacket)..... perhaps you could revisit Edward and do a second version that's more true to his vampire nature?
I have long thought that it would be fascinating to see how people would illustrate Tolkein's work, uninfluenced by all the adaptations. This video is fun to see, even if it is with other well-known characters.
Have you seen his Balrog?
@@FoxySpartan117 No, I'll check it out.
Agree....I want to see all the charakters. ❤
I have been really getting into learning digital painting recently so the brush pack has really came at a fantastic time. I just finished my first fully digital painting using it and I'm honestly so blown away by the whole package. Has to be the best investment I've made in a LONG time! So thank you to everyone involved, so much
I loved seeing your interpretation of The Creature from Mary Shelley's _Frankenstein._ I knew who it was from the description straight away (since I'm an English instructor, and I default to _Frankenstein_ when I have to teach how to analyze a literary work), and it was a delight to see how befuddled you were when you put together this smiling strange character. Ahh, he looks like how he could've been had Victor spent one millisecond welcoming The Creature into the world rather than running out of the house to hide in the courtyard until morning... But then we wouldn't get the court case, framing for murder, and the chase through the Arctic, so....sacrifices, sacrifices. Great video!
it's amazing how Mary was only 18 when she wrote that book
incidentally, a book written in 1815, set in the 1790’s,does not have a Victorian setting.
Almost died laughing during the Frankenstein one 🤣😭
You painted the human Edward :P his looks before turning were described once in the series. Bella really wanted their kid to have his green eyes. But the after look was accurate in the movie lol
I love this series on your channel. So much fun, I love seeing your interpretation of these characters descriptions!
Ooh, I'd love to see you do some of Jane Austen's characters! I know the descriptions aren't always that detailed, but it'd still be cool. Dickens has some excellent descriptions of characters in his stories.
I think your creators missed the mark on Edward. Like all the vampires in the Twilight series,
Edward is described as being impossibly beautiful. At various points in the series, Bella compares him to the mythical Greek god Adonis. His skin is "like marble"-very pale, rock hard, ice cold, and sparkles in the sunlight.
Agreed!! I was thinking in that realm it could be Jasper but it came to me more a Cedric Diggory, funny that he plays that one as well lol
I have read the books and seen the movies. Not shames to admit it lol. But dammit VAMPIRES DON'T SPARKLE! 😂
@@KhaozVoid
They ✨ _singe and burn_ ✨
It was human version - with green eyes, that was depicted. Not his vampire self. But, it kept me and him guessing until the last minute because we both kept saying no, then scratching that guess only to go right back to it. But, through out, I kept Edward in the back of my head - but at the human version. The vampire version is repeated referenced, but the human version is rarely referenced, even in the books. So, I like that the human version was the one that was mentioned in the challenge. Something just little different, but still popular!
@@KhaozVoid Honestly, Vampmeyers don't sparkle, either. That is just how Bella described then, but she got it wrong. Or rather, Stephenie Meyer didn't specify correctly. However, she fixed it in Midnight Sun. The facets of their skin refract light, like a prism. With many colors bouncing off them, they actually looks like they are on fire. Refract, not sparkle, LOL!
This video concept was originally done by lavendertowne a few years back. They're interesting.
i think they knew, they bassicaly copy pasted the thumbnail style lmao
@@alicemation it's even the same picture of edward lol
@@alicemation that's why I can't watch Jazza anymore. The originality is just gone
Notice that two a bit upset at least give inspiration credit to her
@@kittybun8845 idk, he's still fun to watch. his content is still entertaining i don't really care lol
I needed this today it's super early here in America and I'm awake bc anxiety sucks jazz is the best medicine to try and calm down!!
Edited to say I've read twilight a lot (millennial don't judge) and knew instantly it was Edward and what u drew was what I used to picture in my head until the movies came out ur amazing
I hv anxiety too and I can definitely agree with u.
Same here I feel you man
I'm here in America too! I just got off work, it's crazy to have somebody update while I'm awake (I work overnight)
wait how lol? the blue-green eyes really offset me, he does not have those. genuinely curious because that massively confused me in the video
@@omnimonium it's was the way the hair was described bc it's exactly how they say it in the first book
As always everything came out looking amazing! For Edward, it looks like you got his human description from when he was 17 in 1918 :)
Apart from he only has green eyes as a human :(
Really captured the Holmes smile there. In the books is often described as "slightly unsettling to see him smile"
I discovered your channel when your first Painting Characters video showed up in my feed. Still one of my favourite videos to this day. Super cool to see you do another!
When the phrase 'thin, eager face' immediately triggers a memory of reading those exact words in the book lol. Clearly it made an impact lol
The first one, I immediately thought it was a Harry Potter character, especially when you said wizard. Second one, I knew right away it was Sherlock Holmes as soon as I saw the description of a tweed suit. Third one, without looking at the comments, I probably would have guessed Edward. I did not figure out the last two. This is my first time watching one of your videos and it was pretty cool. I am amazed by digital artists. It seems too complicated to me. I just like my paper and pencils and the simplicity of it.
This guy honestly makes me want to get back into art and drawing and actually get better about learning how to drawy own characters.
I love this series. When you said toad, black velvet bow and pink cardigan I knew it was umbridge. Also, I thought of Edward Cullen, Percy Jackson or maybe Jason grace for the Edward one, I don’t know why I guess it’s just my own fan girl instincts. You should definitely do some Percy Jackson characters. I mean, the adaptations (movies) were the least accurate you can be, and the show is not focusing on appearance being accurate, whereas the plot and the essence and personality of characters. Even if there’s pretty accurate fan art, it would be really cool to see your way of doing some characters, since some changes are made in fan art. I definitely want to see that
I also thought that it was Jason grace or Luke Castellen but it never said anything about a scar on his eye and with the perfect 17 year old and the blue green eyes fits Percy so I also thought of him as well
Jazza started drawing handsome squidward for the perfect angular features, lol
it's the fact he makes the characters happy when most are stone faced
Would love to see him try to draw Erik from “The Phantom of The Opera”!
Oh my god that would be amazing!
I think the only accurate depiction I've seen is the cover by Kamil Vojnar for the 1998 edition by Bantam Doubleday. If he's never read the novel, Erik's description is definitely going to throw him for a loop.
I knew the next to last one. There isn't many other choices. I really enjoy these "Painting characters EXACTLY as described in the book" videos. a lot. They are part drawing and a bit of trivia.
For some reason I thought of Shrek but that makes no sense
@@tiasmith3499 The Frankenstein in the movies didn't exactly match up with the book's description. Shrek is based on a book. A teenage Shrek might fit too. He just went bald and his skin might've darkened as he got older.
I love these videos! It's so interesting to see different interpretations of the characters without pre-existing biases.
I am not an artist, I don´t draw at all, but I really *love* this series. Maybe because I am a game master in P&P and very often have to make up people in my mind on the fly and describe them so everybody has a picture in their heads. This series is amazing. It feels as if I re-live the process my players experience in their heads when I am doing my best to fill all those people with life. Thank you for this.
And btw: some of your characters are *way* better than the movie-depictions. Not only in this video. In my youth I did a lot of acting at university, for instance Mary Shelleys Frankenstein. Since I am very tall, I was (you guessed it, right?) the Monster. My long hair was full of mud and hanging down in strains from me. When I saw you drawing the monsters hair I was like "yeah, just like me back then" in my head. And i thought it was only an idea of the regisseur :D
I love this series, and I'm so glad to see a part 2. Thanks, I had so much fun watching this!
I actually like that the person gave him Edward's human description, I know I know, the eyes were the wrong color, but it's cool to see "Hey, this might be how Edward would look as a human in our time".
Love his reaction to Frankenstein’s monster 😂 brilliant
Hey Jezza, really awesome painting of the different characters. Whoever sent in the discretion of Edward was trying to throw you off guessing who he was, because it would have been more obvious you where drawing Edward if they said he had golden eyes. Edward’s eyes are usually described as golden as a vampire, but they do change colours the more time that passes between when he’s last hunted, gradually turning black indicating that he’s thirsty and it’s been too long since he’s gone hunting. As a human Edward actually had green eyes.
In the books Bella has described his Edward’s eyes as turning butterscotch and topaz (which is probably the colour that the person who gave you the discretion was describing to you). In fact in Twilight (the first book) there’s a moment where Bella and Edward are talking as he’s driving her home from school, and he’s asking her questions about herself to get to know her, at one point Edward asks Bella what her favourite gemstone is and she responds with topaz simply because it’s the colour of his eyes that day. Bella notes that she said topaz automatically without thinking because she was looking in his eyes, and her actual favourite gemstone is garnet.
Wasn't expecting a drawing tutorial, but boy am I thankful for it! Thank you so much, Jazza!
The fact that Jazza immediately knew Edward but not Frankenstein's monster lol. Love this channel
I thought Gaston... not Frankenstein's Monster, thinking maybe they just cropped his hair in the movie adaptation. But it was interesting to see you basically equate gigantic = massive beer belly 😆
Yeah, I was thinking either very tall and muscled, or tall and built like someone who does a lot of physical labour, you know, very square and stocky without the shortness I guess?
Yeah I was like "where did the potbelly come from????" Lol
I thought it was Hagrid
I was thinking more towards the giants from the BFG
Me too me too. Thought it was gaston.
I actually really love this I thought you were going to know the character and then get a description and remake them but it turns out you had no idea any of them at all and went only by description and that's super fantastic
I think people get Edwards looks wrong. Twilight is written from Bellas perspective and she was madly in love with him. So Edwards description was very tainted by Bellas positive opinion of him.
this is a very good point- unreliable narrators are such an interesting concept
vampires in that universe are supposed to be utterly beautiful to humans as a means of attracting "dinner". everyone in that universe found all the Cullens insanely attractive.
@@mxloverman2898 Well, all Cullens are very much above average (especially when you consider Edward is 17 (have you looked at actual 17 year olds?) but Belas exaggerated view of Edward is what I was getting at
And Edward didn't consider himself beautiful. He considered himself flawed and monstrous. The exaggerated features (given to make them more appealing to their meals) seen as groteqsue and embarrassing. When Rob Pattinson did the role, he read Twilight for Bella's "perfect" version. Then he read the draft of Midnight Sun for Edward's "flawed" version, then worked with a compromise that was found somewhere in the middle. Both in looks, composure, and personality, and character to find the real Edward himself.
@@HilaryPea Midnight sun wasn't even out back then, was it?
I love these videos. please do more. I love guessing along and sometimes your drawing helps alot. not with Frankensteins monster but Mist of the time you are close to the original. I love this format. I really hope you'll do more.❤
This was a fun video! I love how much fun you're having with showing off your brushes 🤩
Green and pink is a lovely colour combination!
I absolutely loved Frankenstein's creature, mostly because we got to draw him by the book for an English class back in my Sophomore year. As soon as I read his description, I immediately started losing my shit bouncing up and down with joy and excitement to see what Jazza would conjure up.
I was crunched for time when I made mine, so I cut corners by depicting him wearing the cloak he finds, which actually helped me tremendously in getting a haunted look in his eyes by covering half his face with hair from the clock's hood being pulled up.
Hi jazza, you've made me so much more confident about my art. I made a business about a year ago, and it never took off, then I had remembered one day, that I watched you ALL the time, just a few months ago. I started watching again, and it made me more confident of my art. You are an inspiration, jazza. Tysm 🤍🤍🤍
Such cool characters!
Man I was so stoked when I read the description for Frankenstein's creature (I will not call him a monster), I've read the book twice so I knew it immediately when seeing the gigantic height and yellow skin, and the Victorian setting just cemented it haha
It had me thinking Phantom of the Opera cuz while he isn’t tall he’s yellow with his nose falling off his face and he needs a full mask not the typical half mask
I thought it was Shrek haha
@@karenalynne The Creature looks more like a goofy troll, rather than the eloquent, articulate person from the book. He would not have had his belly showing either. Also, the 'Victorian setting' is incorrect. Frankenstein was published in 1818, the year before Victoria was born.
I just found your channel recently and I just want to say thank you for something fun, with all the negativity on the internet this is a breath of fresh air
09:55 why am I seeing him draw handsome Squidward
Edit: Handsome Squidward Cullen
How does Jazza not know that the perfect 17 year old person IS HIM. All those descriptions, describe Jazza perfectly.
When you read the description of the Frankenstein monster, I instantly had to think about its portrayal in "Penny Dreadful" and I literally laughed out loud when you said it was the monster!!! Awseome. I immediately recognised the characters by their description. Love this format XD
Yes! I thought Penny Dreadful as well. Guess those show runners were actually trying to do a more true to the book depiction🤷♀️
I enjoyed this very much LOL As a writer, I think this video showcased the pitfall of dumping too many adjectives and descriptors all together. When readers try making sense of so much info all at one it gets hard and then every reader imagines something different.
Lol jazza drew Umbridge so kind and gentle looking 🤣🤣🤣 I genuinely had no clue who the character was and when he revealed it I was quite shooketh
As soon as I heard “pink cardigan” I know it was umbridge 😂😂
Love your videos jazza your such a skilled artist can't wait to see more
Him: Seventeen year old boy
My brain: EDWARD!!!!!!
The lavendertowne inspired thumbnail really sells it
❤amazing video as always jazza
15:43 I thought for sure it was going to be Quasimodo from the Hunchback of Notre Dame
As soon as you said “pink cardigan” I immediately thought of Umbridge. I love it! Great work!!! 😁
I’ve just taken up painting and I’ve always been somewhat artistic. I’ve learned so much from this video! Thank you for this!
God seeing you draw lights a fire in me. In December 2023 my first book will be published, and with how awesome your drawings are it makes me want to see my characters in real life. Sadly, while I can write stories, I can't really draw anymore lol.
What is it called?
@@_someoneonearth_ The book is called "Last of the Usurpers"!
11:44 funny thing is that this is a perfect 17 years old boy in Jazza's mind 😆
This was really fun to watch. If I did this every character would come out like horribly drawn cartoons 😂
In the book, bella said the the skin of the Cullens are paler than hers, and edward doesn't have blue-green eyes, He has golden eyes. But he had green eyes when he was still a human.