Sig Kilo 10K-ABS HD vs Sig Kilo 6K HD Laser Range Finding Binocular With Applied Ballistics - Part I

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 фев 2025

Комментарии • 89

  • @yaykruser
    @yaykruser Год назад +9

    Finally a review that actually tests them and doesnt just talks about them for 30 minutes-Thanks!

  • @biggs8729
    @biggs8729 11 месяцев назад +4

    Kilo 6K HD At Murdoch’s today for $800. Ranged a pile of trees at 4700 yards. Super happy.

  • @paul.g.h
    @paul.g.h Год назад +5

    Good review. Thanks. I've had the 10k for about 18months now (perhaps the first pair in the UK I brought back here from the States :) I primarily use them for ELR, and used off a bipod I have never failed to get a reading on any reflective target out to around 4000m. They just do the business. I'm sure you won't regret carrying them for your customers. (Oh & btw, they do have a mounting point for a standard 90° elbow type binocular tripod adapter... just screw off the wee cap from the distal end of the centre hinge where you'll find the ¼in female. Works a treat... ;))

    • @yaykruser
      @yaykruser Год назад

      Whats the highest range you got?

  • @Frostytravels
    @Frostytravels Год назад +3

    extremely difficult to film through anything with clarity. Thanks for letting everyone know this. Great video.

  • @735Secure
    @735Secure 4 месяца назад +1

    Excellent review, thank you. I’m subscribing hoping the rest of your reviews are as detailed and thorough!

  • @Orthoshooter
    @Orthoshooter Год назад

    Great review! Thanks for being so thorough and clear in your opinions!

  • @ericknight1153
    @ericknight1153 Год назад +1

    Great review..Look forward to seeing more..👍🏽👍🏽

  • @feetoorourke
    @feetoorourke Год назад +3

    There used to be a spot to mount a tripod stud behind the sig logo.
    I've got the older kilo 3ks, and they've survived being lost under a snow bank for 3 months.

  • @nrf2009
    @nrf2009 Год назад +3

    Excellent comparison. I'd be really interested to see what the integration with a Kestrel elite is like with these units. Does the 6k suffer because it only has AB "lite"

  • @Whipcat
    @Whipcat Год назад +1

    Thanks for the detailed review.

  • @trondjrannilsen3393
    @trondjrannilsen3393 Год назад +5

    There is a tripod mount behind the logo on the front of both of these 👌🏻

    • @paramounttactical
      @paramounttactical  Год назад +2

      Thanks for the intel. Thanks to you I found it. I’m not sure how practical that is but at least there is one. I even double checked the manual. It’s not listed in there at all.

  • @alanmzlee3771
    @alanmzlee3771 9 месяцев назад +1

    I don't own one, maybe one day. As of now I am ok with my PRF :) great review, now I know what I need to get when I saved up the money haha.

  • @Levidanielz
    @Levidanielz Год назад

    Thanks for the honest review sir.

  • @mikecosens7433
    @mikecosens7433 Год назад +1

    How does the ballistic solution look like on the 6k an how hard is it to get too in the minu. Also thank you for a very good review!

  • @jacoblogsdon2850
    @jacoblogsdon2850 Год назад +2

    Paired with a bdx rifle scope those binos are badass. Heavy as all get out though.

  • @bondhedger
    @bondhedger Год назад

    Fabulous side x side review. Any comment on the wind meter included with the 10x? (vs Kestrel or other?). Thanks

  • @jasonsponsler21
    @jasonsponsler21 Год назад +2

    John Walsh had a good question- do you still need to get or have a Kestrel with the 10k

    • @paramounttactical
      @paramounttactical  Год назад +2

      No. The idea is they do everything the Kestrel Elite does. Updates the ballistic solution with environmental changes and distance with every target laze and then provides that in the heads up display.

    • @McgSpook
      @McgSpook Год назад +1

      @@paramounttactical even in MOA

  • @nelsonortiz849
    @nelsonortiz849 Год назад

    Awesome!! Good stuff!!!

  • @jonryan6641
    @jonryan6641 Год назад +1

    The bino’s do have a tripod mount capability. Just unscrew the front cap in between the front lenses. Opens up a 1/4 20 hole.

    • @paramounttactical
      @paramounttactical  Год назад

      Yep. I found that out later. But I appreciate the input!

  • @justsnuggle
    @justsnuggle Год назад +1

    Great Review, THE Real question is "Sig Kilo 6K" or "Vortex Fury HD 5000AB"?

    • @commonsense5709
      @commonsense5709 Год назад

      SIG are disposable throw away RF binoculars because SIG has no plans to offer repairs past their limited 5 year warranty and chances is the warranty may be already expired since it's from date of manufacture not date of actual purchase.
      Vortex has a lifetime warranty including their electronics so they will never become obsolete.

    • @justsnuggle
      @justsnuggle Год назад +1

      @@commonsense5709 i-1000% agree. But you can't argue when sig is the one that's available, and has a pretty good feature set for the price. I think I just saw the 6K go on sale for $800 compared to the vortex rolling around 1300. But that's why I want the comparison because if the vortex has much better glass quality and features then the extra price is worth it when you include the excellent warranty.

  • @haiku13hd
    @haiku13hd Год назад +2

    I’m having a tough time deciding between sig kilo 6k bs vortex fury with AB

    • @paramounttactical
      @paramounttactical  Год назад +4

      Dang… I guess I’ll have to buy those and do a comparison. 😂 it is my job after all. (I’m practicing what I have to tell the wife)

    • @jasonsponsler21
      @jasonsponsler21 Год назад +1

      @@paramounttactical. Tell Summer it’s for science and betterment of mankind

    • @commonsense5709
      @commonsense5709 Год назад

      SIG are disposable throw away items die to their limited 5 year warranty and they have no plans to even repair anything past their 5 year electronics warranty and it's from date of manufacture not date of actual purchase so the warranty might be already expired if you buy new old stock on sale that's been sitting in a warehouse for years before you buy it.
      Vortex on the other hand has a lifetime warranty including their electronics so it will never become obsolete. You pass it on to your kids and grandkids.
      Buy anything SIG brand rangefinders and rifle Scopes etc that has electronics in them, you will find out the hard way ... Expensive paperweights after they break.

    • @richiehalcomb9147
      @richiehalcomb9147 Год назад +2

      The sig blows the fury out of the water in my opinion. Not even a close comparison. I’ve used them all.

    • @AdrianEVD
      @AdrianEVD 11 месяцев назад

      Me too. Glass in Fury and ranging response time is 10 years behind.

  • @Remnant1976
    @Remnant1976 8 месяцев назад

    What are your thoughts on the Sig BDX scopes they have out that work with these binoculars? Have you had a chance to use one or test it?

  • @chrisfisher3900
    @chrisfisher3900 Год назад +1

    Want to see what you think about the vortex impact 4000

    • @paramounttactical
      @paramounttactical  Год назад +4

      Yeah, I’m going to get one to review. My personal thoughts though are that I’m not a fan of LRFs mounted to a rifle. Really limits your use. It has to be zeroed to that rifle and has no versatility. It’s like the Wilcox before it. Everyone thought it was great then realized it was pretty impractical. You can’t even handhold to laze targets. You’re stuck with it on one rifle and that requires a setup process for it to work properly.

  • @SoldMyHat
    @SoldMyHat 10 месяцев назад

    I’m looking to get my first rangefinder. I’ve settled that binos are the way to go for dual use for hunting and long range shooting. At the Sig KIlo 6k price point, is there a better option? Only really aware of the vortex fury or the Burris HD LRF. Any other options and would Sig be the best option?

    • @paramounttactical
      @paramounttactical  10 месяцев назад +3

      I do think the 6Ks are the best option at that price point and are significantly better than the ones you mentioned.
      The LRF and ballistic features are great and you’d have to spend a lot more to get better optical clarity. I’ve been disappointed in Sig optics in the past but they got this one right.
      If you decide to go with those and order from us, we can cover the taxes.
      www.paramounttactical.com/product/kilo6k-hd/
      Either way, I hope that helps and thanks for watching!
      -Gary

  • @miles02000
    @miles02000 Год назад

    Have you looked into the Revic BLR10b at all? I’m curious how it compares in clarity to both

  • @CableDawg496
    @CableDawg496 Год назад +1

    Outdoorsman Binocular mount works great.

    • @jimmymack6938
      @jimmymack6938 6 месяцев назад +2

      Hawke Sport Optics Binocular Tripod Mount 64104 works well too

  • @Aizazell
    @Aizazell 11 месяцев назад

    Will the Sig Kilo10K-ABS HD work with the Garmin Fortrex 901, in the same fashion as the Vector/Viper military Laser Range Finder and the Military Dager GPS

  • @chrisfisher3900
    @chrisfisher3900 6 месяцев назад

    Gary can you do a review on the canyon series of these?

  • @KevinWood44
    @KevinWood44 Год назад +2

    I heard Sig has BY FAR the best laser but horrendous optics/glass. Leica basically the opposite (amazing glass but just a decent laser) and Vortex is somewhere in between with both. Is this accurate?

    • @paramounttactical
      @paramounttactical  Год назад +1

      The 6K HD has extremely good clarity/glass quality. Surprisingly impressive. I’ve looked through the Leica geovid, I’d need a Leica to look through side by side but I’d bet it’s close.

    • @KevinWood44
      @KevinWood44 Год назад +1

      @@paramounttactical Hmm No shit?? I guess it also depends what you are using it for. If it is also your binos you want/need better glass, but if you just need to range targets who really cares about the glass?
      I am looking for a higher end RF (compared to current Leupold) and it is a very tough call. I want a ballstic RF so Im looking at the Leica 2800, the Vortex 5000 and the Sig. Not an easy call. Thanks for the video...and info

    • @paramounttactical
      @paramounttactical  Год назад

      @@KevinWood44 I need to get my hands on the other ones to do a real time/side by side comparison, but based off memory, the Sig Kilo6K we’re as good and better than any sub $2K binos I’ve looked through.

  • @GaryV16
    @GaryV16 Год назад +2

    Always love the no shit information. . RLTW. Wow. Is that Miles Gap off Gerrandstown rd and Apple Harvest Dr?

  • @ericknight1153
    @ericknight1153 Год назад +1

    Is the ballistic software upgradeable on the 6K?

    • @paramounttactical
      @paramounttactical  Год назад +2

      Nothing to indicate that. It probably is capable but then you couldn’t sell next year’s model.

    • @shanetate8754
      @shanetate8754 Год назад +1

      @@paramounttactical Thank you for the great review. Am I misunderstanding that you can sync these to any Garmin watch with the AB Elite software and it will give the 6K the ability to give ballistic solutions out past the 800 yards that comes with the UltraLite? I recently purchased a Garmin Instinct 2x Tactical that has the AB Elite software, and purchased the Sig Kilo 6k HD with the understanding that it did.

    • @paramounttactical
      @paramounttactical  Год назад

      @@shanetate8754 I believe you are correct. I know they’ll definitely sync with multiple Garmin devices just not 100% sure on which ones. We’re a Garmin dealer and it’s something I’ve been meaning to get schooled up on.

  • @ChrisiiOwnz
    @ChrisiiOwnz 8 месяцев назад

    Where’s part 2 - wanted to see how the wind compares to kestrel

  • @charlesmiller9462
    @charlesmiller9462 10 месяцев назад +1

    For us the poor people, have you done a review on the sig Zulu 10 HDX?

    • @paramounttactical
      @paramounttactical  10 месяцев назад

      I call that the PRF. The Peasant Range Finder!
      😂 I’m totally kidding. No I haven’t but I will look into doing some more budget friendly LRFs.
      Thanks for watching!
      -Gary

  • @northerngunner2756
    @northerngunner2756 Год назад +1

    The Ip rating makes the decision for me. Pacific northwest hunting means your going to get wet . Very wet.

  • @esalazar425
    @esalazar425 Год назад +3

    I understand that it CAN, big emphasis on can, increase the length of support for a product. That being said, paying a subscription to use hardware to its full potential makes my balls itch.

    • @paramounttactical
      @paramounttactical  Год назад +1

      I'm sorry bro, I don't know what you're referring to. What subscription?

    • @esalazar425
      @esalazar425 Год назад +3

      @@paramounttactical the sub for the map app, I know it’s a 3rd party separate portion for some extra cool but the amount of subscriptions that show on my bank statements now feels like a cvs receipt. And that’s after I’ve even cancelled a bunch of ‘em!

    • @paramounttactical
      @paramounttactical  Год назад +1

      @@esalazar425 ahh. I hear you. That’s kind of a peripheral thing. More for hunters but it does come with an emergency response service as well.

  • @kevinarndt2011
    @kevinarndt2011 Год назад +1

    Why not offer a battery you can recharge

    • @paramounttactical
      @paramounttactical  Год назад

      A lot of outdoorsman don’t like rechargeable batteries. It’s hard to recharge a battery in the field. Replaceable batteries are easier to carry on you. Rechargeable batteries go bad as well. So typically the preference for outdoor products is replaceable.
      Thanks for watching!
      -Gary

  • @MountainManThan
    @MountainManThan 11 месяцев назад

    Binos or an impact 4000 first?

    • @paramounttactical
      @paramounttactical  11 месяцев назад

      Binos. You’ll get 10x the usage out of them. The only exception might be if you’re primarily hunting/shooting at night with a clip on. Other than that, binos all the way.

  • @McgSpook
    @McgSpook Год назад +1

    you should have set the ballistics to MIL so people dont get confused. ps. i meant before you did the this is stupid comment.

    • @paramounttactical
      @paramounttactical  Год назад +1

      That was staged… just for you. 😂

    • @McgSpook
      @McgSpook Год назад +1

      @@paramounttactical HA i feel the love.

    • @paramounttactical
      @paramounttactical  Год назад +2

      @@McgSpook I’m going to have little Jeff Easter eggs strategically placed in all my videos.

    • @McgSpook
      @McgSpook Год назад +2

      @@paramounttactical oh ffs. i dont need this in my life. you are mad about the patch? that it? cant we all just get along? hahahahahaha

    • @paramounttactical
      @paramounttactical  Год назад +2

      @@McgSpook 😂🤣 it’s EXACTLY WHAT YOU NEED in your life.

  • @buzzonedown
    @buzzonedown Месяц назад

    Good info but good god, ramble on....... I have an old Luepold rx-850i that's rated to 850 yard and ranges solid targets out to 1000 or so. Those ranging numbers from Sig, are pathetic. But it's Sig, it's to be expected.

  • @jasonsponsler21
    @jasonsponsler21 Год назад +5

    2600 yds would be plenty of range for my ability.

    • @McgSpook
      @McgSpook Год назад +2

      300 yards would be the limit of mine.. Man, i love those things. if only they had MOA ballistic holdovers.. Oh wait..

    • @jasonsponsler21
      @jasonsponsler21 Год назад +1

      @@McgSpookif you switched to mil I bet you could make 400yds

    • @McgSpook
      @McgSpook Год назад

      @@jasonsponsler21 #lifegoals

  • @sunnesonne
    @sunnesonne Год назад

    What about 10x compact?

    • @paramounttactical
      @paramounttactical  Год назад

      I’m not really interested in 32mm objective lens optics for what I do.

    • @sunnesonne
      @sunnesonne Год назад

      @@paramounttactical it is certainly smaller, will be taking mine to a

    • @paramounttactical
      @paramounttactical  Год назад +1

      @@sunnesonne if you’re just trying to use it to range targets, it’s probably ok but I used both the 6K and 10k’s this weekend at a Long Range Course we held and I can tell you spotting effectively beyond 700 or so with them was tough. The compacts will be less so by a significant margin.