I damaged my 5900X taking my cooler off with liquid metal (4 years) and while yes the Liquid Metal kept the processor nice and cool, just don't apply it with the sense of upgrading a few years down the pipe. Anywho, I'm looking at the 5900XT or 5700X3D as my replacement processor. This is my living room PC and I'm using my spare parts from my primary PC after upgrading to AMD 5 platform with the 9900X. I have $150 in gift cards at BB. The 5700X3D is currently sold out at BB so the 5900XT is looking real interesting. Glad to see it has similar performance to the 5900X. I'm guessing it can't OC as much with 16 cores and presumably less quality silicon. My damaged 5900X could hit 4825 MHZ playing games, but only stable in productivity at 4725 MHZ. On the flipside, I should sell my X570 MB with 32 Gigs of ram (3600 MHZ CL16) for $150 and go all in on AM5.
@@de-todo-un-poco-argentinapor lo que he visto en un vídeo, dicen que el silicio del 5900xt es de peor calidad, aunque no sé dónde se pueda corroborar esa información xd
considering that 5950x is cheaper and runs a tiny bit cooler and is a tiny bit stronger id say 5950x is the clear winner, but its really not by much. so it just depends on where you get which one faster or cheaper.
I dont understand why Ryzen 5900xt is rubbish when its $300 cheaper, runs faster than 10-15 FPS than 5900x, Sane Power consumption and its newer while the 5900 os already 5 years old. the power supply reason why bills goes up and playing 8 hours a day. your better off going to Internet xafe spending 3 dollars an hour than playing with the higest gpu and 4090 unless your earning 5k a week I would properly spend less time pverclocking your pc gaming 32 GB ddr4 would help with performance
// Timestamp
0:00 Intro
0:19 Gaming Benchmarks
0:21 Baldur's Gate 3
1:03 Counter-Strike 2
1:44 Cyberpunk 2077
3:05 Forza Horizon 5
3:47 Horizon Forbidden West
4:28 Starfield
5:10 Star Wars Outlaws
5:52 Total War Saga: Troy
6:33 Overall Gaming Results
7:38 Synthetic Tests
8:36 Outro
I damaged my 5900X taking my cooler off with liquid metal (4 years) and while yes the Liquid Metal kept the processor nice and cool, just don't apply it with the sense of upgrading a few years down the pipe. Anywho, I'm looking at the 5900XT or 5700X3D as my replacement processor. This is my living room PC and I'm using my spare parts from my primary PC after upgrading to AMD 5 platform with the 9900X. I have $150 in gift cards at BB. The 5700X3D is currently sold out at BB so the 5900XT is looking real interesting. Glad to see it has similar performance to the 5900X. I'm guessing it can't OC as much with 16 cores and presumably less quality silicon. My damaged 5900X could hit 4825 MHZ playing games, but only stable in productivity at 4725 MHZ. On the flipside, I should sell my X570 MB with 32 Gigs of ram (3600 MHZ CL16) for $150 and go all in on AM5.
ryzen 5900x still the beast for AM4.
Are you using Windows 11 24h2?
🤓👍 very neat test, i didnt now that video games can use 32 threads 🐢
how
who is better this mobo Asus Rog Strix B550-F Gaming or
Asus Tuf Gaming X570 gaming plus, Gigabyte B550M Aorus Elite AX V2 ?
Much better temperature on 5900x
less cores spread out over same size IHS. easier to cool.
hola ese ryzen 5900xt es un ryzen 5950x con menos mhz?
exactamente, un poco menos mas
@@ZendaKenn alli arme el 5900xt pero es un poquito estresadito viene un poco limitado para hacerle overclock y undervolt jeje.
@@de-todo-un-poco-argentinapor lo que he visto en un vídeo, dicen que el silicio del 5900xt es de peor calidad, aunque no sé dónde se pueda corroborar esa información xd
@@carlosraulvargas7445 si seguro que si porque tiene menos velocidad.
@@carlosraulvargas7445 🤣🤣🤣
basically 5900x cores +
with 5950x cache = 5900xt
Both 5900X & 5950X have 64MB of L3 cache.
@vh9network doesn't matter L3
L1 up from 700 to 1mb
L2 from 6mb to 8MB
agua vs water
not really
the cache
for virtualizor: 5900xt OR 5950x??? wich's better??? I love you all.
im also wondering
considering that 5950x is cheaper and runs a tiny bit cooler and is a tiny bit stronger id say 5950x is the clear winner, but its really not by much. so it just depends on where you get which one faster or cheaper.
@@ThroneAndLibertyEdenthis guy didnt test the 5900xt right i run the same settings and get much higher fps in cs2
why 1080p? why not 4K?
So that the GPU does not become a bottleneck and does not limit the performance of the CPU.
Bo 1080p jest nadal najpopularniejsze, p po za tym w 4k karta graficzna przejmuje obliczenia, a procesory sa w większości zblizone do siebie
cause 1080p is king
if set to 4k, then the work is do by the GPU. this test is for CPU
5900XT is rubbish
Not for the current price. 😂 it’s only $20 more than the x. You get more cores and threads.
Yes for the price. If it was 50% cheaper yes
5950x It's much more expensive. This comment would only make sense if both were equivalent in price.
He didnt test the 5900xt right.
@@SinisterLynch wym by that?
I dont understand why Ryzen 5900xt is rubbish when its $300 cheaper, runs faster than 10-15 FPS than 5900x, Sane Power consumption and its newer while the 5900 os already 5 years old. the power supply reason why bills goes up and playing 8 hours a day. your better off going to Internet xafe spending 3 dollars an hour than playing with the higest gpu and 4090 unless your earning 5k a week I would properly spend less time pverclocking your pc gaming 32 GB ddr4 would help with performance