He isn't asking her to expose them on RUclips; Just to identify any jurors that have been claimed to be compromised by the very court officers responsible for making sure they aren't... For his clients sake, I hope he appealed, and got a new judge/jury!!! Just to be on the safe side...That way, they both win; She doesn't have to release the names, and he can be assured of a fair trial...
Judge Boyd caught him. The fact that he's fighting so hard to pretend he doesn't understand what Judge Boyd is saying - and what she is saying is EXTREMELY simple - means that HE is not being truthful. One or both of the following is true 1. he know that he can't produce the person who supposedly told Mr Lane this information. Which makes him REALLY dodgy. 2. he has a totally different purpose, and is really after all the jurors' information, but doesn't want to admit that. Which makes him REALLY dodgy. Judge Boyd has, by following logic and legal procedure, shown him to be a lying bastard who is lying. And REALLY dodgy.
More like: She doesn't understand what he's saying...? No need for either of them to understand each other; Just switch judge, and jury, and its settled...She wont need to release the names, and he can assure his client of a fair trial; Everyone wins...
@@brentfarvors192 "just switch judge and jury". More like just throw away about $50,000 in tax payer money and slow up the court system even more, for no purpose at all. What the "lawyer" is saying is exceptionally easy to understand. What he is requesting is TOTALLY outrageous. And saying that "a security guard" told someone something, who told him, and expecting that to fly in a COURT? This attorney has been bought and sold, because no straight up lawyer would even try to pull this. And no intelligent corrupt lawyer would either. It's laughable.
From what I understand the affidavit in hand was not even the original source of the accusation. The whole thing is pure hearsay. Why does the attorney need all of the jury information in the first place?
Because an accusation of jury rigging has been alleged by a officer of the very court tasked with making sure a trial isn't rigged...Best to just air on the side of caution, and start over with a new judge/jury in the interest of a fair trial...No need to release the jurors names, if they do that.
2:03 transcription is sus. "I'll file the mushroom a new trial then if the court grants hearing I can issue some p3n!s at that time." What are we even doing?
A bailiff reported a juror for disregarding court rules. He wants their name(s), to question if it affected the rest of the jury. Most likely, they will start over with a new judge/jury, to ensure the trial is fair. I imagine the change in venue has already been granted...
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
The defense attorney is as dense as a rock.
That defense attorney is so smarmy. And he knows full well she doesn't identify jurors on you tube
He isn't asking her to expose them on RUclips; Just to identify any jurors that have been claimed to be compromised by the very court officers responsible for making sure they aren't... For his clients sake, I hope he appealed, and got a new judge/jury!!! Just to be on the safe side...That way, they both win; She doesn't have to release the names, and he can be assured of a fair trial...
The defense atty. is dense, and is not getting what the judge has tried to explain…repeatedly.
You are correct
He gets it. He just wants it his way
Judge Boyd caught him.
The fact that he's fighting so hard to pretend he doesn't understand what Judge Boyd is saying - and what she is saying is EXTREMELY simple - means that HE is not being truthful.
One or both of the following is true
1. he know that he can't produce the person who supposedly told Mr Lane this information. Which makes him REALLY dodgy.
2. he has a totally different purpose, and is really after all the jurors' information, but doesn't want to admit that. Which makes him REALLY dodgy.
Judge Boyd has, by following logic and legal procedure, shown him to be a lying bastard who is lying. And REALLY dodgy.
Facts
More like: She doesn't understand what he's saying...? No need for either of them to understand each other; Just switch judge, and jury, and its settled...She wont need to release the names, and he can assure his client of a fair trial; Everyone wins...
@@brentfarvors192 "just switch judge and jury". More like just throw away about $50,000 in tax payer money and slow up the court system even more, for no purpose at all.
What the "lawyer" is saying is exceptionally easy to understand.
What he is requesting is TOTALLY outrageous. And saying that "a security guard" told someone something, who told him, and expecting that to fly in a COURT?
This attorney has been bought and sold, because no straight up lawyer would even try to pull this.
And no intelligent corrupt lawyer would either.
It's laughable.
From what I understand the affidavit in hand was not even the original source of the accusation. The whole thing is pure hearsay. Why does the attorney need all of the jury information in the first place?
Because an accusation of jury rigging has been alleged by a officer of the very court tasked with making sure a trial isn't rigged...Best to just air on the side of caution, and start over with a new judge/jury in the interest of a fair trial...No need to release the jurors names, if they do that.
Cause he's the jury card attorney.🤣🤣
2:03 transcription is sus. "I'll file the mushroom a new trial then if the court grants hearing I can issue some p3n!s at that time." What are we even doing?
Need a follow up on this case to find out what we are missing please.
A bailiff reported a juror for disregarding court rules. He wants their name(s), to question if it affected the rest of the jury. Most likely, they will start over with a new judge/jury, to ensure the trial is fair. I imagine the change in venue has already been granted...
Ooh ee ooh ahh ahh wallawalaa bing bang 😅
Jeez this transcription is awful. Tons of misspellings from context. Please do better.
"I'll file the mushroom" come on.
Thanks for your comment, we'll work harder
And he can issue WHAT if the court grants hearing?! WHOA BOY!