Dr. James Beacham - What's outside the universe? | The Conference 2019
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 май 2024
- Dr. James Beacham is a particle physicist searching for answers to the biggest open questions of physics using the largest experiment ever, the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. He hunts for dark matter, gravitons, quantum black holes and dark photons as a member of the ATLAS collaboration, one of the teams that discovered the Higgs boson in 2012. He ended The Conference 2019 with a science class out of this world and a reminder of that to physics - we're all the same.
www.theconference.se
![Beyond the Observable Universe [4K]](/img/1.gif)
His hair style convince me that he knows what he's talking about.
I think he was/is Melany.
@@emissarysisko9314 Bro, chill out
I LOLLED 😭
Another way of saying your iq at 189! Lol
The title convinces me that he doesn’t know the answer. Im not going to spend 60 minutes listening to someone make a guess.
The 2 people men who won the Nobel prize are not just 2 old white men. Very rude, considering the amount of work and sacrifice those two must’ve made to earn that prize.
Content of character my friend, content of character.
his dismissal of white men achievements is what i expect from a university "professor" these days
What you talkin bout Willis? 🤔
What comments do you expect from a flaming woke liberal?
I just don't see why he mentioned that. It just didn't seem appropriate. It seemed racist. Is the fact that white males have contributed greatly to science, math, etc. a mark against them? If so, then what about the NBA? Is it wrong that it is dominated by black males? What does James say when he watches an NBA game and sees the starting lineup - "five black males?" The "white males" he referred to were brilliant. There's a wave of feeling today that white male = bad, all others = noble beings suppressed by white males.
He is a strange one
What did the two “white males” reference part have to do with anything? 🤔
Cringe comment... Specially him being white
yea im pretty sure those guys won because of how smart they are not because of skin color.
Nothing. But that little "ping" pales in comparison to his subjective sociopolitical speechmaking beginning at 42:28.
He can have his points of view but there's a time and place for them.
Going to 43 minutes tells us who he really is....someone who wants what he wants, and knows better what you need. Sound familiar?
universe is everything, then what is outside of it? This is a question that has been asked for centuries, and even today, we don't have a definitive answer. But as this video shows, the universe is not just a static, unchanging entity. It's expanding and evolving, and we're just starting to scratch the surface of understanding its mysteries. Melody, the narrator's childhood friend, was unafraid to ask the big questions, and it's that kind of curiosity and willingness to explore that has driven us to make so many incredible discoveries about the universe. Who knows what we'll uncover next
its a question for selft volunteer ignorants and brainwashed, sadly most of the stupid masses.
Research Satans/God FLAT EARTH
James sir, you are an incredible lecturer, and educator. You make your lecturing come alive! Your articulating and the knack of making extremely complicated science classes, understandable to thick empty headed people like me, is a gift! You are special, my friend!! Thanks for educating me in the workings of the Universe! 😊
OMG, I just noticed that he's the teacher Mr. Van Driessen.
@@tomasinacovell4293 don't understand bab lol
He sucks, dry mouth and injecting hes dumb liberal comments here an there... Passssss
in college, I took a black holes, relativity and cosmology course.. and asked my professor this very question.. what was outside the edge.. He laughed it off and said I was stupid for asking it and no idea what I was talking about. If this guy had been my professor.. I would have gotten an A in that course.. he explained it in 30 seconds.. even if it is just a theory because we really don't know.. it satisfies that question.
Retired teacher/prof/tech analyst here I have always thought that the brightest people are those who ask a LOT of questions.
@@williamwatts4790 thank you.
how can there Be an edge , when everything moves away from each other
every galaxy is moving away from every other galaxy at the speed of light ...
trust me , there's No edge
or we would see waves coming back in the background radiation picture
there isn't a center Because there is no edge ,
when you get That statement , you'll get the point
@@ThermaL-ty7bw back then and now.. I didn't come up with the idea of the "edge" I just asked if there was an edge, what would be beyond it.. so you're response isn't needed.. yet again youtube strikes!
Thank you
You nailed it at the 27minute mark m8 when you said :You might think I'm Crazy???" - You can bet on it fella- I think you're Crazy.
I've never felt more emotionally moved by science talks than by Dr. Beacham's talks.
Beacham is a ding bat.
@@andyburns8551 I like knobs.
OMG, I just noticed that he's the teacher Mr. Van Driessen.
Great presentation...but I certainly did not expect a morality lecture on conclusion. Sadly we cannot dictate morality nor location and speed of an electron...
Oh and that's just the tip of the iceberg if the things you can't explain.
Hey, let's talk about science, but I also have to let everyone know I'm a liberal too.
@@d.b.s.6381that’s because they are usually the educated ones that don’t believe in conspiracy theories or that the world was created by a mysterious man in the sky. Also they are the ones that don’t condone fascism.
He’s not dictating anything. He’s letting you know objetive facts.
This has made me wonder and I want to wake up early every day to make a change to other folks lives
Thank you sir for educating us in the manner that you do. Truly appreciate you.
One of the most compelling words ever spoken that i have ever encountered. In the scheme of our universe our mother Earth is so insignificant, too small to be even noticed and we think we are big and mighty. we are not. What does it take for us humans to realise this Fact.
Question: Assume humans DO realise this and internalize it.
How does this knowledge change the way humans live, work and act here on Earth?
Earth is special and it is insignificant. It can be both things at the same time. Life may only exist on Earth out of the whole universe. But then again life may be abundant across the universe. But then again the universe is so big contact between life forms across the universe may be impossible. So we may be in effect alone.
@@redmed10 Exactly what I thought. We maybe alone. We maybe not. But we are effectively alone, 100%. Unless we see evidence for us to believe otherwise.
I don't know what's outside but there is a great diner at the edge
I’ll have a table for two at that restaurant…:- )
A giant microscope and a bunch of aliens watching us. Laughing.
Carl's Diner
Table for one lonly guy?
🤣😎 underrated comment! #42
Thank you Dr Beachman!
Man I love these subjects so much I wish I had the math skills to enter this field. Dr. James is amazing at these lectures just dropping gems left and right.
I watched this twice. I love it James is the bomb. RUclips needs to invent a double-thumbs up icon thingamajig
Agreeable
Everybody should just watch the videos about the double split experiment to vaguely understand what quantum physics is trying to deal with.
And then watch a video on Entanglement and your head will just explode.
Brilliant explanation - thank you....
Honestly if anybody is nerdy on this kind of information like me you've seen this guy before I don't really know him but I love the way he tells his stories it's so gripping.
Man and I thought Brian Greene was intriguing and regular- knowledge people friendly. I will dig deeper in this man's work
Only watched 20minutes and this guy caught me up already even listening and reading tons of Mr. Green lectures.
Get this guy a cup of water lol
Absolutely fantastic presentation
Yea a bit too fantastic for a physics lecture.
This is like an Oniontalks. Pretentious, preachy, melodramatic, sulerficial, assinine, frivolous.
@@jamesbarlow6423 sßssßzzzzzzzzzsßzzzzzzzzázzzzzzazzzzzzzzzzzzzzzá ZZ zzz zzz zzz zzz zzz zzz azZzzzazzzzzzzZzzzzzazzZzzzzzzzzzzzzzZzZazzazzzza zzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZz zzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzaazzzzzazzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZzzzzazzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZzaazZz as zzzzzZzzzzzzzzzzzzZzazzzzzazzAzZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzazzzZzZzazzzzzZzzazzzzazZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzazzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZzzzzzazzzzzzz zzz zzzzzzzZzzzZzzzzzzZzZzZZZzzzzzzzZzz Zzz zzzzzzzzzzazzzzzzZzzZzzzzzzZzzzzzzzZzZZZZzzzzZZZzzzzzazZzzzzZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzazzzazzzZzzzzz ZZZ zzzzzzZzzzZzZzZzzzzzzazzzzzZzzZZZZzzzzzzzzZzzzZzzzzazZzZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZzzzZzzzzZzzzzZZZzzzzZzZzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzZzzzZzZzZzzzzzzazzzzzZzzZZZZzzzzzzzzZzzzZzzzzazZzZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZzzzZzzzzZzzzzZZZzzzzZzZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZzzzzzZzzZzzzzzzzzzAzzZzzzzzzzzZzZzzzzzazzzzZAZZzzZZZzzzzaZzzzzZzzzzZzzZzzzzzzzzzZzz zzz zZzzzzzzzzzzzZZzzzzzzzzZzzzZzzzzz zzz zZzzZzzZzzzzzzAzzZzzzzzzzzZzzzz Zzz zzzZZZZZzzzzzzzAzZzZZ ZZZ ZzzzzzzzZZZAZzzzzzzzzzzzzZz zzz zzzzzz zzz zzzzzzzz ZZZ Z ZZZ ZZZZZZZZZZ ZZZ ZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZzZzzZZZZ ZZZ ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzZZZz zzz zZzzzZzzzzz zzz zzz zzz zzzzzzzZ zzzzzzZzzzZzZzZzzzzzzazzzzzZzzZZZZzzzzzzzzZzzzZzzzzazZzZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZzzzZzzzzZzzzzZZZzzzzZzZzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzZzzzzZzzZzzzzZzzzzzzzzZzzzzzzzZZZZZZzzzzz zzz zZzzzZzzzzz zzz zzz zzz zzz zzzzz zzz zzZzZZzZzzzzZzzzzzZzzzzZzZzzZZzZZzzzzzZzzZZzzzZzzzzzZz zzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZzzZzZZZZZzzZzZzzZZzzzzzzzz ZZZ zzzZZz zzz zzz Zzz zzzzZzzzzzzzZzzz Za ZZz zzz Zzz zZzzz Zzz zZZz Zzz zzzzZzzzzzzzZzzz zzz zzz zzzzZ ZZZ ZZzzZzzzzZZZZzzzZzzzZz zzz zzz zzz ZzzZZZZZzzzzzzzzZzzzZzz zzz ZZzzzZZzzzz ZZZ ZzzzZZZ zzz zzzZ ZZZ ZzzzZzZZzZZZZZZzzzZZZZZZzzz Zzz ZzZZzzzZzz ZZZ zZwz zzz ZzZZZz zzz zzz zzz Zzz zzz zzzzzZZZZ ZZZ zzZ zzz z zzz zzz zzz zzz zzz z zzz, zzz zzz ZZZ ZZ ZZZ zzZZZ ZZZ ZZ ZZZ ZZZ ZZZ ZZZ z ZZZ z Zzz zZzzZZZzz zzz z ZZZ ZZZ ZZZ ZZZ zzz zzz zZzzZZZZZZzZZz zzz zzzZ ZZZ zzz zzz ZZ TOP Zzz zzz ZZZ Z ZZZ ZzzZzZZz ZZZ ZZZ ZzZz ZZZ Z ZZZ Z Z ZZZ ZZ ZzZ zzz zZZZZ zzz zzz zzz Zzz z zzz zzz zZzzZZ ZZZ ZZZ ZZ zzz ZZz ZZZ ZZZ ZZ zzz zzzzzz zzz ZzZZz zzz ZZZ zzzZZ zzz zzz zZz zzz ZZz Zzz ZzzzZZZzzZz ZZZ Z ZZZ z zzz zzZZzzZZZzZZzzzz ZZZ zZZZz zzz ZZZZ ZZZ Z ZZZ ZZ zzZZzz zzz zzz Zzz zzz zzzzzzZZZZ,z,zZzz,ZZZZ ZZZ z zzz z zzz zzz,ZzZzz ZZZ ZZZ ZZ Z,ZZzzzzzz ZZZ ZZ zzz Zz
What is so fantastic? He said nothing finally! If I say that the bible says God created space matter and time (Genesis chapter 1, verse 1) wouldn't it be fantastic also? If not, why?
Fascinating discussion as it warms my being that i am all things ,great and small in the notion of infinite universes
In the last decade or so I've often thought about how humans (& possibly other animals) may possibly experience the expansion of the universe & then that may possibly affect our experience of nostalgia.
Most of us may usually agree that even independently of family life, we nearly always look back more fondly of our younger years and regard those times as being better back then & usually associate it only with different stages & ages in life.
But what if;
That is driven, at least in part, by an ability we may have to sense how the expansion of everything including in our bodies and around us progresses. Then as the years & decades pass we at least subconciously perceive & remember the relative differences in how close together things are & since it's always expanding, things seemed better years ago because everything was closer together !?
There is at least a couple of ways that I can think of that we could perceive this & that's primarily; if light moves at a constant speed then everything takes longer & longer to percieve visually as time goes on &; electical signals would also take longer to get around our body and brain leaving us thinking (& maybe moving) slower than in the past.
This possible ability of humans to perceive this could also affect or at least be partly responsible for our perception of time speeding up as we get older which I think nearly all of us would say it does.
If there is any truth to that, I think our usually somewhat bias nostalgia is also naturally affected by other obvious factors such as levels of pollution, chaos & other things & events negativly, positively or neutrally percieved in our world around us & how we remember them.
I'm aware of course that nearly all of our bias nostalgia may just stem from our lives usually being a bit easier to live to the fullest when we were younger.
(1/Jan/2023-12:19pm🇦🇺EST)
I reckon somewhere in the universe, there was also a particle physicist delivering a talk on social justice.
Why.
Hahahaha. That's cute!
You mean except for this one? "Two white males won the Nobel prize... what a surprise" I wanted to here about physics not sjw mentalities.
@@j.dmetalhead7517 he is a sjw delivering a talk on particle physics
@@C.D.J.Burton I was enjoying the video until I heard him say those words.
Its a shame.
I had to rewind the youtube video because I was suprised tbh.
For someone in His position to revert to that is shocking espeshialy when science itslef should be represented regardless of skin colour.
I was about to share His video on social media but after that statement he made I am declining.
Can anyone explain to me: How do we know its the entirety of space that's expanding? How do we know the big bang isn't just an expansion of matter and energy into a pre-existing - and possibly infinite - void?
Part of it is that - assuming we accept the theory of relativity, which I would say is a healthy assumption given the massive experimental evidence - it is the only explanation of the fact that the further away objects are from us, the faster they appear to recede. That can only be explained by assuming space itself expands. If 'stuff' just kept on moving in all directions 'in space' from 'some explosion' this would not be the case. Try to visualise both concepts in your head and you can actually understand this. The confusing comment in the talk about that the space that makes up you is also inflating leaves out that inflation is overcome by gravity, which is why local galaxies don't recede for example. One is actually on a collision course with our Milky Way.
Why it happens is a different question entirely of course, but the inflation of space is simply an observable fact, assuming (again) that Relativity is really a thing.
We dont.
Its just the accepted theory on existence because the past few hundred years and we've decided that based on what we can see now must be absolute truth.
I'm sure it wont change based on another few hundred years when we detect even farther out....
Oh also being unable to describe over 80% of the mass and gravity of the universe as just invisible matter isnt a factor whatsoever either. Its just fact. Even if we cant see, or interact or even prove what it actually is
@@nelson_rebel3907 GR has been tested over and over and has yet to fail in any of its predictions- bending of space-time due to massive objects, frame dragging, gravitational waves, time dilation, etc. That doesn’t mean a new theory couldn’t explain dark matter and dark energy, that’s just scientific progression. Just like Newton’s laws aren’t “wrong” Einstein just came up with a more complete theory
If the universe is expanding there has to be an edge orbit can’t be growing.
That’s what scientists are trying to discover. What might cause this expansion? Is the universe truly infinite, and what would that mean? There are many such unanswered questions.
Great guy... Explains vividly and easily explained. Following him at "the royal institute" which, by the way, is a fantastic "place" with many fantastic people with fantastic lectures.
What a moving "talk". How much have a learnt from you. Thanks, a thousend thanks. Send my love to my sister in this universe, Melody.
I used to lay in bed as a kid looking through the cracks in my bedroom curtains wondering about all this. My brain did the same thing then as it is doing now, overload and lock up.
Talk about having some weird dreams after falling sleep listening to this lecture!
Maybe your dreams were the normal part
I don't why he suddenly pivoted to completely abstract discussion of life's existence with picking up the tablet and just reading off the script. Until then I was totally immersed in his lecture.
I agree you wouldn't understand
Yeah him suddenly holding and reading off the tablet was odd and shows he didnt fully prepare for this lecture. The whole portion of him reading off about how all electrons are the same and they are just part of the electron field not tobe viewed as individual entities was strange as well. I can rattle that off without having to read it off a screen.
I notice that too, I was engaged till he start reading from that tablet.
But in my mind I totally understand that. I guess he wanted to choose his words carefully especially when it meant a lot more philosophy and in morality. Look how he get back to the tablet at 44:40
It seems obviously he is avoiding any misconception might be taking out of context.
Dear Mr. Beacham
Gravity is just kinetic energy. vacuums don't have density. densless states of matter makes density move. Are vacuums states of matter what is the scale. vacuums are timeless and "(Massless?)" while electons are timless but they have density. vacuums then plasma then gas then liquid and solid to nuclear. but states of matter are more complex then that. we have platonic states of matter where extra protons are picked up.
What is mass then is density and density is inertial energy. Gravity is kenitic energy because we are surrounded with gas which acts like plasma which acts like vacuums. the important part about mass is that the closer you are to the center of gravity the denser you are.
What is a vacuum? What i mean by massless; is that any mass right there is being expanded faster than the speed of light.
X-mass Y-velocity Z-mass S-speed
Basically speed cancels each other out because everytime you speed velocity up it looks like you gained mass on object (a) because object (b) was inside with this graph. Which sounds familiar to me. Heres an example.
\:The "Marry Go Round (MGR) experiment" You Johny, and Danny are playing on MGR A and B. Johny is standing on MGR A and danny is standing on MGR B. MGR B is sitting atop MGR A. Both MGRs get spun in the same direction. This experiment is decribe the difference between expansion and speed. You are the origin for Johny' speed and Johny is the origin for Danny's speed. What does Johny have speed in reference to~ you? Yes you are completely relative to his position. Thus Johny is relative to Danny's position not you; because you have no force enacting on Danny. Why does Danny move faster than Johny when the same amount of force is enacting upon them? I'll tell you why It's because Danny is expanding away. You see Danny has his own limit of speed; Johny can spin Danny as fast as light moves because Johny is Danny's origin.
:\Plasma is timeless but vacuums the first state of matter are densless. Speed becomes fourth dimensional in a vacuum. Solids can store this extra dimension of speed really well because they hold shape. This is called inertial force.
:\Expansion can easily be engineered in the same way the marry go round experiment does it. Lets say you create an electrical magnetic force inside a coil spun in the shape of a solo cup. the electrical magnetic charge is connected to a casing with coils of the same device in multiple sequences until you reach the expedition ship. Now of course you would have to allow the coil to be hot for anything to happen but you begin to expand at a rate greater than the speed of light and possibly even faster. Whats the problem; we have a limitation of devices.
This is as far as i can take us into the future thank you.
Sincerely- Ronald Braden Russell, __ or Mr. only has a highschool degree?
ps device 2 laser computer
__________________________
system one: I~ cast; II~ inner ring cylinder/gear(?) axel; III~ middle cylinder, IV~ brush anode connection, V~ axel.
the cast doesn't move but (II) is a sum thick cylinder that moves on ball bearing means of a belt or gear system, (III) moves on the center axel and the (v) the center axel has some anode which collects information and sends it to (IV) who takes the computation numbers into the rest of the system.
\:The inner ring has mounted lasers ~ and the middle cylinder has a glass waved medium with electricity flowing through. (II) and (IV) move independantely in oppisite directions to express a form of mass expansion replicating the movement of a black hole.
Great Speach James, a delight to listen to you with much attention.
I asked the same type of questions at the age of 8 about 50 years ago about the universe and the problems of people being treated badly in the world. We have vastly developed our technology since then. It's a pity a lot of the problems of the world for most of the people on it still remain. Which is sad.
Were you able to come up with any solutions to these problems?
@@MonarchsOfBrotherhood
Nope but at least more people are talking about these things now or at least I am now aware of them talking about these things.
@@redmed10 at least we (humanity) are moving forward at knowledge 😊💜
And then everyone clapped.
Makes you wonder why we haven't been back to the moon...
You'd of thought we would of colonized it by now.
Nobel prize-winner Leon Lederman: "The expansion of the universe doesn't actually affect the spaces between particles. The universe's expansion is not a force that will rip particles, molecules or even objects apart. The 'fabric of space' is not stretching - just the distances between really large things like galaxies. So while the distance between the milky way and its nearest neighbor may increase over the next billion years, the distance between the proton and neutron in a deuterium atom's nucleus will not.
Love his style and his voice
Absolutely beautiful. Thank you.
Why is it so beautiful? If I say God made space, matter and time, (Genesis chapter 1, verse 1)is this beautiful to you? If not, why?
Dr James' views of scientific truth is quite wholesome and satisfying as his notion of fear leaves the things quite open for the future possibilities of human desire to know in the decades to come.
One of the Best speach I heard , bravo ! Lots of info and even make s me Wonder about a bright future
Thank for this amazing talk ❤
This man is amazing, love his lectures! Keep em coming.
Some of the best explanations for things we all wonder about. Great speaker.
NICE THAT A SCIENTIST IS ABLE
TO CONVEY “COMPLICATED
SUBJECTS” INTO PLAIN LANGUAGE FOR THE GENERAL
PUBLIC ….THANK YOU SIR ‼️.
Wonderful presentation
I’m glad this cosmologist/physicist is skeptical of some of modern science insofar as he opines that much of what we don’t know is unknowable to humanity at least in our current condition. What lies beyond, if anything, may be revealed to us in some time, condition or space made known to us either in life or after death
Would it make sense that the interaction between energy and dark matter is what makes this plane of existence possible? That the universe (bubble) we live in is just that? Can it pop? Is it a snowglobe waiting to be shaken up again? Is the multiverse balanced or slightly askew to keep the perpetual motion going? Are we on the big turtle?
I only possess a high school diploma I earned over 20 years ago, so the fact he was reading off a tablet and I'm watching him on my computer now, saying things my half-educated ass thought in 1996 is bonkers.
While physics isn't my field of study, from what I understand, the universe wouldn't exist as it does without dark matter. At the very least, galaxies wouldn't have formed without the concentrating and binding effect of dark matter. As far as the universe "popping," the closest to a consensus we currently have doesn't suggest a definitive end beyond the universe eventually expanding to the point at which even protons are torn apart in a process referred to as the "heat-death of the universe." Stars will exhaust their supplies of Hydrogen, Helium, and eventually every fusible element until only blackholes remain; at which point, they will slowly evaporate due to Hawking radiation over unfathomable spans of time and blink out of existence. That's currently the most popular view, at least, but like all science, it's provisional and liable to change. Oh, and _yes,_ it's turtles all the way down.
Edit: Fixed some typos and awkward wording.
A captivating and inspired speaker
A superficial monologist.
This is like an Oniontalks. Pretentious, preachy, melodramatic, superficial, assinine, frivolous.
@@jamesbarlow6423 learn to spell before you use big words
@@banditthedog6268 . Uh-huh....and which word was misspelled?😂
@@jamesbarlow6423 asinine
@@banditthedog6268 . Ah, thank you. I kept my thumb on the "s" key too long....
Or as Hemingway said, "You'll always find a phony ready to help you out with the language."🙄
This lecture was amazing
Why does each galaxy in the universe spin WAY faster than it should? I wonder how many people in Gaza are considering this question .... I respect the question, but "what you ARE speaks so loud, I cannot hear what you are saying". It's GREAT to look at the stars .... just so long as the rest of humanity has the space to do so ..... and I say this to someone whom I KNOW has a deep social conscience. So, LOVE and .... kinda .... RESPECT.
James Beacham, you have composed a poem, an epic, a symphony, which is the universe, our universe.
I always thought that the universe, by definition, is all inclusive, and thus, there cannot be any "outside the universe". But then, we run into the problem of infinity. There is no way for finite beings to grasp infinity, not even the concept.
Word is that, as you put it, infinity means repetition, and thus the existence of multiverse. We may need a different terminology, but, even within the current definition, multiverse need to break out of the traditional spatial confine to have any claim to existence. Multiverse is a dimensional concept, not a separate spatial existence, that inhabits within our own universe, within ourselves.
I can grasp infinity going forward. I completely comprehend an infinite amount of time from this point forward. I have a hard time grasping an infinite past. Obviously that comes from our idea that everything has a beginning.
he has watched too many Marvel films it seems!
@@checkmate79 Instead of hyper-sphere topology, with implication of big bang........ consider a hyper-torus topology, which allows locally observable less than uniform expansion, permits unobservable ( to us ) contraction elsewhere, accepts the possibility of saddle shaped spacetime, in which time is a circle with an ever moving "now" 180 degrees removed from an ever moving "eternity" ....... Big bang was never more than an implication of an assumption, anyway, and always raised more questions than it answered.
@@checkmate79
"I completely comprehend an infinite amount of time . . . "
Do you?
Do you, really?
That's like, a termite, in Missouri, (no offense), saying,
"I completely comprehend the total expanse, and depth, of the pacific ocean. . . . "
Do you?
Do you, really?
No.
No one can 'comprehend' eternity, going forward, or past; because, the one, is the same as the other.
When it comes to eternity, there is no future or past, it all, just; IS.
Sitting in the Doctor's Waiting Room may seem like forever; but, we can't immagine, the Doctor never appearing. Never! Ever, appearing!
There would he no 'purpose' in our waiting.
We can't comprehend Forever!
We can try to immagine it.
But anything we can articulate, will be mere speculation and assumption.
Not comprehension.
Not a full understanding.
In the beginning, God created the Heavens and the earth. Genesis chapter 1, verse 1. Time began , space and matter was created. God is the Creator of everything, as the bible says.
Why not believe this?
Always a pleasure listening to him speak. I have so much adoration for James 😌🤩
Agree!
You want to have this dude at the collider. Super smart. Huge brain. Made me feel smart.
That was effing fascinating. Moooore!!!!!
Bosons were hypothesised by Indian Scientist Dr Bose and were named after him. Whenever you mention HiggsBosons no one seem to mention the name of Dr Bose . It is always Higgs , a British scientist Dr Higgs particularly when coming to awarding Nobel Prize.
To be fair, dead people aren’t eligible for the Nobel prize. But I’m with you...Bose-Einstein condensates could be very important future technologies. He should be a household name
And he also lived at a time when almost credit was given to euro-centric scientists
@@twt1524 - What has changed? A lot to f foreign exchange students solve problems and contribute vast amounts of knowledge only for their famous professors to receive the credit.
@@kingwillie206 Vae victis.
Would you be more satisfied if the particle was called the Bosehiggson? Besides, you can make the same point of many scientists, like Gunnar Nordström vs Einstein, or Tesla vs Edison.
At least history is acknowledging their scientific contributions, even if its long after the fact.
This was one of the best speaches I've ever heard. The part about the Universe is questioning itself through us humans was a mind blowing. I hope they will manage to make that plasma accelerator. Very good, A+
Yes indeed +1
If he had any sense, he would recognize, that a Creator/Designer existed. Where there is information, intelligence can always be traced to it. He knows this.
@@baberoot1998 "traced to it", but it can't be traced itself...useless
@@baberoot1998 Are there invisible gnomes chiseling out snowflakes too?
ruclips.net/video/Hc3XN8kiwg4/видео.html
Your true identity
Melody sounds amazing... I'm glad you got to be her friend 🙂❤️
There is An Universe Observed By An Observer But There is Another Universe Felt By Heart Which is Much Profound Bigger Real Indestructible The Universe Melody And U Were Happily Facing the odds With Courage... U are A Philosopher Sir Along with Physics...
The universe is everywhere.
There is no "outside".
so the universe is infinite? the universe is expanding into its self? moron
@@DrSbaitsojr
Even when the universe was very small, it was still everywhere !
You need to imagine the concept "null".
Null is not a thing or empty space.
It's not even nothing !
Wow! You rock Tony! Keep telling it like it is.
If the universe is expanding away from us in all directions, wouldn't that put us at the center? Also, if that's the case, how is it possible for the Milky-Way galaxy to collide with the Andromeda galaxy or any galaxies to collide. To see pictures of galaxies colliding makes ya think. 🤔
Because locally these rules dont apply. It's averaged out.
Our planet must too expanding
makes sense that all particles are actually just the comprisal of various fields, consider for a moment what that means in terms of the double slit experiment.
The reason why observation collapses waveforms is inherently tied to the nature of multiple fields acting as factors having to be evaluated before a physical particle was found. Once the particles in the form of the double slit experiment were "found" or "spawned into existance due to observation" they produce a straight line, When unobserved until the point of contact on the sheet, it acts as a bellcurve with interferance lines.
Why does observation collapse the fields and why do collapsed fields continue to act in a way similar to the particles we know? Because observation inherently is the evaluation of the fields through a physical lense (not like we know what that means on the quantum level), and the particles we know must be states inwhich the fields get locked into post evaluation; what we know as observable particles.
There must also be some sort of field interaction with electrons, photons and the nucleus of atoms which would likely explain why we have this issue with tracking electrons around an atomic mass. It's likely that instead when the electron or photons hits the atom in question it is a change in the interlocked fields that make up the atom in question and the result is the decaying electrons or photons. Which would be a good reason why when photons hit atoms the energy states of electrons increase and why some substances can release light when affected by electricity.
Two questions. 1 if a particle and antipartical collide a massless photon is created. What happens to the mass? 2 If you observe a galaxy 10 billion lightyears away the light has been traveling for 10 billion years, but if you included time dilation might the galaxy much younger and thus much farther away than it appears even at that time. If so, how would time dilation change the calculation of space expansion?
his explanation of how to give a example of higgs field standing on the bridge has made me realise the importance of the higgs particle,
Couldn't watch
Who talks like that
It’s more fun to think about the meaning behind it all, why do we exist, and try to focus on your breathing as you try to fall asleep, all without making yourself insane or wondering what happens to you after death and what this all means.
Why did the universe expand to the size it is and not some other size? What encouraged or limited the rate/amount of expansion?
This is one of The greatest talks i have ever heard
I 've got it. He is Peter Sellers as professor Strangelove !
truly grateful for your insight and knowledge
This is like an Oniontalks. Pretentious, preachy, melodramatic, sulerficial, assinine, frivolous.
Knowledge? What knowledge? That guy knows only what is written in books. No more than that. He has no answer on what's outside the Universe. And if he ever knew, what would be outside his answer? He wouldn't know either! So, he spoke for an hour, for no answer at all. And most people commented that he is a great speaker.
Now the bible says that God created, space matter and time. Many believers in God teach this. But the same people listening to this guy in the video, and saying how awesome he is, would say that believing in a Creator is completely crazy. How would you explain this?
What an eloquent talk ❤❤
How does space travel faster than light? It makes perfect sense because space provides the support for light and all matter, so space would necessarily have to be moving faster than everything else but how does that space move faster and then, what does space expand into? More space? How exactly does one measure the movement of space itself?
Everything could appear, in an illusory sense, to be expanding infinitely if the movement is happening in the shape of a torus, constantly evoluting and involuting. But then, what does that torus rest upon? More space?
If infinity loops back upon itself then that which ends is endlessly ending and is simultaneously and constantly starting. One could say this is the description of consciousness. Such consiousness could be the immediate effect of a constantly looping infinity or infinity could be the effect of consiousness. Both answer the question of what is beyond space: the beyond itself is contained in the constant loop of infinity and or consiousness. Perhaps then, the tiniest particles of energy are fully conscious. Such particles would of necessity be infinitely curious, asking one single, loving and non-judgmental question: "What's going to happen next?"
Imagine these particles, momentarily you, asking:"What's (insert your name here) going to do next?" No judgement there, just loving curiousity.
You yourself are the Universe. A living, endlessly evolving poem; a work of art in progress. The Universe: You-in-Verse. So, sing your world into being.
Well done doc
I know NOTHING and I have accepted that wholeheartedly, but having heard James speak a few times, I am just fascinated by his brain and ideas. Go big or go home is his motto and I am here for it!
What he described from 36:00 onwards is also what is known as the Tao by the ancient Chinese sages in Tao Te Ching.
I would to add to rephrase a postulate he mentioned as " anything that is possible happens"
Further evidence of muliverse is Schlesinger cat is both alive and dead, in fact at plank scale the universe is branching constantly at mind boggling rates.
And if the universe is infinite since we are possible we happen over and over in all possibilities.
So theoretically we may not travel backward in time but we can simulate and use evidence to view however dimly our past.
This is nothing miraculous we do it every time we read a story or dream. Even more amazing is almost every humans ability to predict the future at least for short times in spite of this quantum multi versal noise.
Also if we wish with either our internal or external assistance we can feel like we travel in time or to any multiree we choose.
Also I think the social commentary was off topic and strangely reminded me of Schottky's story which is a cautonary tale about such things!
The implications of these physics for us socially are profound and more than a little shocking implying both free will and fate to be valid perspectives from short to long time frames.
This topic is huge and goes into information theory which is also becoming a perspective of physics.
Understanding in any field, along any direction will always required us to re-equip our conscience accordingly and I am thankful some scientists see this as a co-nature of their efforts.
Children, in particular, should benefit tremendously given this mixture of understanding and a much wider, more universal attitude. Gratefully appreciating the value of this talk.
A lot said here, but no answer. The bible says that God is the Creator of everything. Space, matter and time. Why not teach this? It is surely worth an hour of talking for nothing!
Love the first two thirds of this presentation… that’s all I’m going to say
+1 Beacham should fear the Globalists. How's Melanie faring, now?
proving that knowledge and wisdom are compartmentalized, and ignorance is possible in even the smartest of us. unfettered capitalism is why we have this fantastic world that we live in, yet his limited intellect, assisted by bad values, sees it as a negative. And he falls into mystical leftist-collectivist narratives.
totally with you there. shit is ruining everything man
Couldn't just leave it out for Chri$t sakes, had me all of the way to that point
@@6916lightfighter i watched another lecture by this guy... skipped to near the end... yep political bullshit. Its a shame i actually loved the lecture until he started seething about fake nazis. Iv had enuf of people pushing their political cock down my throat. I came here for physics.
So we have two possible solutions: Either Futurama was right, and at the end of the universe there's a partition of white where an alternate universe also sits, or we're waiting for the red shift/blue shift phase of the universe to reverse course and begin shrinking into itself to repeat the concentration of mass.
Add: I was going to withhold the next Aha moment, but I was reminded some months ago watching another "physics" video postulating that time doesn't exist. In a long winded way drastically shortened, time seems like a more convenient way of defining an observation versus a concrete idea. One 'for instance', looking out into the cosmos, all of that light that's taken xx many years to reach us likely, if the math is to be true, no longer exists in its point of origin, whether that be the precise state or location. We're quite possibly looking backwards in time in the present, which physics tells us as we understand it to be impossible, yet there it is.
We as a species have a lot of understanding yet to discover, but our verbiage if you will needs better definition. All of our combined knowledge, for the most part, has been observed here on Earth. While the principles remain similar, everything is subject to question when it occurs outside of Earth, so things that people often think will violate the 'laws' of physics (or more correctly, the laws of humans written by and for human understanding) may in fact need better definition through observation.
Long version short, go out to the edge of the universe with an open mind. 😉
Excellent presentation.
Love this guy. All the gleeful, child-like enthusiasm you want and need from a boffin. He looks like coffee is the only thing passes through his body for days at a time as he baffles over questions he already knows he cant answer. Brilliant speaker. Brian Cox + Carl Sagan + woody Allen = James Beacham
Well put
Fascinating! The idea that I am part of a quantum field that IS the universe is really cool.
Quantum fields
Scientific Spirituality or Spiritual Science?
@@jennifersimpson4061 neither.
One primary reason of objecting a super collider is not the fear of knowledge. It is the triage of limited resource to scientific inquiry. We have limited resources. And the unified quantum-gravity theory may not be the most important question. Dedicating resource to the super collider implies sacrificing funding for other scientific inquiry and discovery.
I will love to hear more about Quantum Field Theory.
Check out RUclips lecture by David Tong - another excellent presentation
That's fact he's doesn't understand his job or politics doesn't make me feel better about our place in ever discovering anything useful in explaining existence.
He knows his job. Thanks for being triggered! Fascists and right wingers actively prevent the progression of mankind and its gathering of information and furtherance of science.
If you want to talk politics you will make tons more money with a great sci-fi novel like the Foundation series. You are quite good at ideas.
We as individuals are both, the good and bad traits that the universe decides to either keeps around or weed out. The mind of an all seeing God which makes up all of everything would be incredibly lonely. Naturally, all of what makes up the entirety of absolutely nothing at all, becomes the canvass which brings forth everything. Anything. Improving the skills for creation in it’s every attempt.
This is just great information congrats on this talk
He said a lot, but answered nothing finally. Now if I say that God created space matter and time, would you congratulate me? If not, why? What I said also comes from a book, the bible. Genesis chapter 1, verse 1.
Who had created the God? It's us only.. for the sake of not going insane by taking about an infinity, in a number of infinities for an infinite answer.
@@snovite11 If there is no God, we would not be here to talk about it. No God. No world. No creature. No life of any kind.
I we are here, and conscious about it, it is because we have been created by someone who is not of this world. And God is not from this world, and has no beginning and no end. Or then, how could nothing create something??? I'll wait for your answer.
I have never heard anyone speak, who could with this level of excitement and empathy, articulate the magnitude of the concepts of quantum mechanics in such a comprehensive manner, that I now consider him not only a brilliant physicist, but also a gifted poet.
A gentleman and a scholar
"Electron is an excitation in a background quantum field that permeates the entire universe." It's amazing how uncannily similar the quantum field theory is to the theory of 'Advaita' or 'non-duality' from Vedic philosophy of India. My yoga guru gave the example of waves that rise and fall in a ocean an an analogy to explain the relationship between atman (individual consciousness) and brahman (universal consciousness).
I like sex.
Your yoga guru is an idiot that smokes too much weed and needs to get a real job.
Let
Expansion didn't taper off. Time dilation occurred. So from our perspective it tapered but from outside the big bang only just begun
Stars move faster than predicted because we are looking at a snapshot of an event from very far in the past. If expansion is continuing to accelerate then time dilation is also. Meaning we are seeing the speed of a star's movement at a point during expansion when time had not been dragged out as long as it has in our lifetime. Time moves slower now than it did in the past.
50:32 Two universes can't possibly "collide" simply because assuming such a possibility would be tantamount to assuming that there could be a spatial distance (or some sort of a spacetime or something) that could be shrinking between the two universes causing them to collide; which in turn would be an unscientific assumption as per the very presumably scientific definition of a universe that is supposed to be encompassing everything we may conceptually consider as being subject to distance or time.
The very notion of colliding should only make sense "inside" a universe. Therefore, advancing the colliding question or possibility in the first place should be considered to be absurd or at least irrational.
Edit: If there should be more than one universe, they must be mutually exclusive ontologically speaking. Either universe A exists or universe B exists. Not A and B "simultaneously". No two "everythings" may co-exist simply because the implied ontological framework for their relationship would have no place to exist. Where/when/how would the relation between any two presumed universes exist anyway for them to co-exist?
Awesome lecture!!!!
Never touched the titled question. Glad I had it on double speed & jumped through it : False advertising.
The pulse short micro non plasma plasma folding system is a Tallow of wavelengths that flexes on the exteriors of the inwards spiral so a collision refraction or a projection zero collapse is the outcome
The fact the cmb shows its flat by our best measurements is crazy
He knows what's he's talking about in Physics, why would he dare to go into other fields without being the expert. His lack of knowledge in Economics, makes him against the very system that makes possible the Large Hadron Collider. He should remake this without trying to give an opinion in what happens at this level of reality. Other than that, great explanation of where is physics nowadays.
What
Science can't work without capitalism? Possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
@@Jimi_Lee did I say that? I said that capitalism is the system that creates enough wealth to create this huge science experiments. It's not funded through a wealth killing system like socialism.
@@gamorro Both China and USSR raised the living standards in their countries and lifted more people out of poverty in the past century than capitalism has in western nations, and over a much shorter time. Plus neither had 200+ years of virtually unchallenged expansion with no comparable competitors on the continent, like the US, which accounts for a large part of the success of capitalism, such as its been. I wonder how much of the gains of capitalism in the first world are directly proportional to natural wealth extracted from the third world. Did capitalism create wealth, or just redistribute it?
@@Jimi_Lee completely untrue, capitalism is the system that has brought more people out of poverty. Get your facts straight.
And remember the millions murdered under socialism by Stalin or the millions killed under communism by Mao.
Socialism can never work bc it ignores human nature . Your dream world pretends there is no envy, greed or jealousy.
Today's school's pretend to teach capitalism by teachers who lie, ignore the facts and are unqualified to teach capitalism bc they don't understand the first thing about it.
Great job, Dr Beacham. You are a great story teller. Our world needs more generalists who can put together science with moral, politicical, social, environmental implications, and most of all, who have integrity and care about the future of all of us
Universe is a scientific way of saying Heaven. It means the same thing in every way.
Be a lot better if it was actually science and no fiction.
Their is as much physical evidence of this preachers claims as any priest from any religion, Religion has no evidence in reality to their claim , same this evangelical nutjob.
32:21
Because the interaction between two protons occurred and laws of univers work everywhere that means that the protons passed each other in measurable distance.
The closer the protons travel (from our point of view, the farder the protons pass each other.
Therefore if we want to pass two protons very close we need to cool them down.
Yes. And then Absolute Zero .
🙏 THANK YOU FOR SAYING THIS !🙏👍❤️💕❤️💕❤️
I’ve always wondered that myself. What is the substrate that the universe expands into? Almost seems like magic to think we sprang forth from a literal void and exist within it. Voids are a terrifying and seemingly incomprehensible subject for the human mind to wrap itself around. But the opposite end of that possibility is just as fascinating, that it isn’t a void, rather a primordial sea of potential energy of form of matter. Of course going down that road of speculation would only open a Pandora’s box of further questions. You can only humble yourself by saying “I don’t know, but I’ll continue to ask and observe.”
Yeah it's a truly terrifying topic. It's the kind of utter incomprehensibility that makes you want to just give up that line of thinking. You can invent a god and strictly put a stop to those questions as a rule, but then you still have the same problem. Why is there anything instead of nothing? If there were nothing at all, that would be just as baffling. I'm generally optimistic about the possibilities of science, but I have my doubts as to whether the true nature of reality can ever really be understood in human terms.
I have smelly balls.
Eric Dubay and vibes of Cosmos have some great information on their channels! 😁👍
Love the end of your comment where you say we just don't know !!!! .... now that's a great starting point!
That is one of those chicken or the egg questions. Nothing in our experience has no limits. Everything has an inside and an outside. And there is always something "beyond" the outside.
Beautifully poetic and brilliant!
I love how you weave the connection of humanity and the universe. You are right! We are in it together.
Under the veil of love and light, we whole heartedly and instinctively know that destruction and greed serves no good purpose and money is useless.
We must navigate our way out of the fears and darkness of the ego's sinister prison and abolish destruction and selfishness. Enter into majestic wonders and find the gift of love and light where we recall, we always loved each other with all our might.
It's beautiful deep stuff that the universe honors within every soul.
Peace all you majestic souls of love and light!🕊🙏💞💞💞🕊
Here are possibilities.
1.Universe come from nothing
2.It created itself
3 Was created by something created
4.Was created by something uncreated
Now using our brains which one sounds the most logical
1.Universe came from nothing
(This is absurd because nothing is the absence of something. 0+0=0)
2. The universe created itself
( absurd because you're saying something exist and not exist at the same time. Example is the mother who gave birth to herself)
3. The universe was created by something else that was created, perhaps a chain of multiverses. ( here you run into infinite regress fallacy. If we say who created the creator then the following question is who created the creator that created the creator, and so on and on......to infinity.
This is impossible because we run into infinite regression fallacy.
let me give you an example.
Let's say a sniper aquire his target (a deer) on the crosshaire, in order to shoot he needs a permission from the guy behind him, and the guy behind him needs a permission from another guy behind him, and so on and on in a never ending chain to infinity...
Now here is the question?
Will the sniper ever shoot the deer?
Why or why not.
The answer is NO, because any given moment the request for permission is moving backwards
OK, but if the deer gets shot? This means the request ended with someone who gave the order, who doesn't need a permission from anyone else.
4. So God is the uncreated eternal being. He is the explanation to creation.
ruclips.net/video/6IYK_M3ACHI/видео.html
Suggesting that inflation should have gone on forever at the same incredible speed of the initial expansion is like suggesting that if there was "nothing" (no universe) to begin with, that nothingness should have gone on forever. Since we so far can't measure universe creation, we have to guess at how to explain things that only happened once in the history of this universe, and they may not conform to the physics of this established universe that we can observe.
Can anyone help me with this question: Why can we detect the Microwave Background radiation (the earliest light that we can see) and not the light from stars beyond the observable universe? Should not the microwave radiation also be beyond what we can detect?