Sadly everyone seems willing to be bought today even when they know damn well that these politician 'ordered' thought police ... go against everything we once considered the basic human right to speak our minds, especially in the UK where taking the Pi** was a national pastime! It's Totalitarianism. Until the police and military refuse to comply to this absurdity and defend their families, friends and neighbors... we're scr*wed.
That’s what Brits want. So when there’s a Rotherham and thousands of girls assaulted for years, you have this Chief to pretend through bs that nothing happened. Why don’t you all just surrender to Putin and the pop over to the pub.
We have the same problem in the USA, we're living nearly in a live version of "1984". If this Marxist Kamala Harris gets installed, all hell going to break out upon the citizens.
@@Drareg-x3m That's some impressive mental gymnastics your coworker performed. Exactly what allows the erosion of our rights and freedoms while they tell you , it's for your own good..... 4 legs good 2 legs bad! 🐖
It isn't just offensive language. It is offensive language towards the ruling class. These are persecutions from the ruling class down to political rivals.
However there should be some kind of evidence. My wife is a nurse who has been trying to contact a patient with mental health issues for bowel cancer screening, but so far the individual has ignored 5 letters. Every time she phoned them up they say they need it in writing otherwise they can't do anything. Don't worry, she hasn't told me any details. She has come home upset now because the individual has acused her of being evil and locking them in a windowless room (ie shutting the office door during a patient interview.) The office has a window she always opens, and she never locks the door, but this doesn't change the fact that one mentally unstable individual's imagination and inability to tell the difference between that and reality could potentially land my wife up to her kneck in charges and tribunals. Police only chase a conviction, collect evidence and hand it over to the courts, they don't care if it's right or wrong. Junior Officers are just trying to build up their portfolio for promotion, so will try and create as severe a case as they can from anything. They say there's no smoke without fire, but police today don't seem to be able to tell when it's just foggy 🤷♂️
@@littlenan3576 Of course, in a free country you're free to hate it. But on the other side one should be free to swear. It's when we start policing speech do we become no better than Nazis.
@@BigLeBowski4456 He's likely a brainwashed puppet of "The Party". He's toeing the line to keep his job because his union has ordered him to obey these rules (they too, are members of the The Party).
@@DavidSimpson-dm9kf although funny just stand up for yourself hopefully peacefully lol I just told a cop to shut up last night because he told me to shut up haha and spoken to the sarg who's not on a power trip and actually nice lol
Here we have a senior police officer behaving like a politician. He will not give a direct answer to the question asked of him. How can you have a 'victim', if there is no crime ?
Cops, especially when they are not at the lowest level, are just politicians with guns. The archaic ideology of protecting the public/serving the people hasn’t existed for a while. It’s about power and control.
That’s why this guy should be removed from his position, due to lack of confidence in his command. Just like somebody driving a ship. You get rid of enough of these guys and all this politician police chief stuff goes out the window. Instead encourages word, salad fights instead of just cutting off the cancer and sending a message to the police that it’s not good for your career to play politician.
Although I don't like the idea of these ppl rule over the regular ppl I still think that the issue is not him but the Government. Somehow they at down with the Police but the police just apply the rules. Some othe loony came up with an idea and put that into a law... :) Instead of Defund the police we should defund the Government. Or at least make them accountible because they nowhere neer accountible
already is late. how long did this whole case go-on before one descent human being finally challenged them on it. This should have never even started in the first place...
We have been pursuing foreign immigration for 50+ years. And if you widen the pool of identity groups and weaken the bonds of common feeling within the population then you are inevitably going to increase calls for the regulation of speech. Think of it like a dinner party. The more weirdos you invite the more likely you are to have a barney and for the owner of the house to announce "lets not talk about politics". Freedom under the law as elaborated in the U.S, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Britain arose out of the particular White Anglo Saxon Protestant people who dominated those countries. It wont survive immigration. What we will get in the medium term is a managed anarcho tyranny. And in the long term the future will be defined by whichever ethno-cultural group gets all its ducks in a row - in Britain that will be either a native revival or an Islamic rival power structure
Probably trying hard to keep the photos of himself and some minor in bed together at the Masonic temple from being leaked by the people pulling his strings.
Yes, it has ended up in effect a parallel to parliament creating laws. It doesn't create laws but directs how the police interpret them. In this case it directs white man bad, everyone else good.
If you refer to the complainant in a criminal trial as “the victim”, the defence counsel will immediately object on the grounds that such language is plainly prejudicial, and that fact is so obvious and uncontroversial that any judge will immediately uphold the objection without a second thought. And yet this man seriously expects anyone to believe he doesn’t understand why “victim”, in a scenario where not only has nobody been charged, but no crime has even been committed, is inappropriately loaded language?
Don't get too hung up on Magna Carta. It was created to protect the powerful and wealthy so they could rule their little empires without royal intervention. It was never about the ordinary common people.
I never, in my wildest dreams as a child in the 1980's could have imagined the MET would become the Stasi. Yet here we are, and this was FOUR years ago!!
One day our country will be liberated and all the files written about us will be available for us to see. At present a dossier is gradually being constructed. There is social engineering being enacted.
Women cops more than a minority has changed the whole culture. Men working with them either overly protective or simps. If actual violent crime happens Im yet to see a woman acting as decent back up.
This demonstrates, where we are today. The judge in this case showed common sense and justice. This high ranking officer is being evasive. This is a dangerous road for free speech.
We are headed towards complete surveillance. Most likely it will be fully implemented after a false flag, that way the general population will "understand" the need for such surveillance. To play devil's advocate, I understand why a farmer would want to keep track of their cattle. Make no mistake, to the entity running the world, we are cattle.
Give up you plum, Do you really think that the police want to investigate tweets. If a crime is reported, it's their duty to investigate it. It's not the police's problem that the population has decided that it's now ok to report tweets to the police is now acceptable. The police can't win, if they investigate they are Orwellien, if they don't they are useless. They can't win either way. So you don't have a clue what your talking about.
You can fight for your rights. Starmer will not be re-elected. Make your voice heard at every election, by-election, council, referendums, anything to get the msg thru to Labour. Tories failed to listen and we had 14 years of them, so we can survive 5 years of Starmer, if we have to.
@@therealpollyanna5846 They don't have elections. They have theatre performances where the pleebs go and pretend they have say. They don't; and because they are disarmed, they are at the mercy of their tyrannical government whose main goal is to depopulate down to an easily controlled population of slaves they can do whatever they like too without consequences. For years, Brits have been telling me how stupid I was for demanding my God and Guns. How smart are you feeling now as your nation descends into an Orwellian nightmare? The "conspiracy theorists," were and still are correct about everything. Everything. However evil and twisted you think our WEF global Komm-U-nist-controlled governments are... the truth is far far worse.
Every police office that complies with this stupidity should must be named and shamed. "I was just doing my job" is the language of those trying to divorce themselves of responsibility when they know what they are doing is wrong and morally corrupt.
@@PutItAway101 Somebody said it. If not Orwell....who? It's well known. I guess we'll have to give credit to one who's known as "Anonymous". A lot of sayings have been attributed to "Anonymous". In other words, it's NOT a fake quote. Someone did say it but NOT Orwell. Now, that we have that straightened out, is there some truth to that statement? THAT is the real question. Arguing over the author doesn't disprove OR prove the validity of that statement.
@@JackHaveman52 it is a fake quote, because it's being attributed to someone who didn't say it, a false source. What it is, is a meme. It's something that people keep saying, but nobody knows who said it, or if it even was said by a noteworthy person in a "quotable" context (i.e. a speech, an interview or a formal piece of writing), so it's just a meme. When I go to the toilet I often say to myself "drop the stupid fucking jobby, I have places to be". Is this a quote? No, because nobody gives a toss about me.
@@JasonSpielberg "Meme" is different than an anonymous quote. There is such a thing, you know. There are also songs and stories that have "Anonymous" as their author. All anonymous means is that we don't know who actually coined the saying. Usually, one can figure out the one who creates a meme. You can google "anonymous quotes" and you'll find lots of sites and thousands of quotes with no known author. If, for some reason, your bathroom saying takes off, because I repeat it and everyone starts using it and I never tell anyone who first said it, it will become an anonymous quote. Another one of thousands of them. Don't get so excited. Why does this saying upset you so much? It's just an expression. Who cares who said it.
@@JackHaveman52 it's not framed as an anonymous quote though, it's framed as a George Orwell quote, so it's a fake quote. Songs and stories are not quotes either, they're songs and stories, by anonymous authors. You can still tell they were written by actual writers, by reading the whole-ass book and judging its quality, unlike an anonymous quote which could have been written by anyone. So-called "Anonymous quotes" themselves are also fake quotes. They certainly can't be considered legitimate quotes, especially if you can produce no record of them having ever being uttered in anything other than a post on the internet. I'm not upset either, I think perhaps you would like me to be upset because it brings you pleasure, which I can understand as I too enjoy causing suffering unto others, but it's impossible in this case. I don't remember the last time I ever felt upset about anything, actually. I'm certainly not upset here anyway, I just think you're wrong.
A “victim” is a person on the receiving end of a crime. If there has been no crime, only a hate incident, then there can be no victim. A “complainant” is someone who believes a crime, or wrongdoing, has been committed against them, but has yet to have that proven. There should be no such thing as a non crime hate incident. It’s such a BS term designed purely save the feelings of people ill-equipped to deal with the realities of modern day life.
"Have I committed a crime officer?" No. "Then F off!" Offensive or insulting language is not a crime. And no one can be trusted as a neutral arbiter. What one calls hateful, another calls accurately observing reality. This copper is happy to enforce thought and language policing in the vain of Orwells "1984". "Officer, your suggestion that this type of policing is justified, is insulting and offensive. Please arrest yourself."
Actually since 2003 offending or insulting someone digitally in the UK is a crime. Thousands (no exaggeration) of UK citizens are arrested every year quite literally for mean tweets and insulting facebook posts etc. "A person is guilty of an offence if he- (a)sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character" -section 127 Communications Act 2003 It has been a crime for much longer if the insult is likely to "stir up racial hatred"; "A person who uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening, abusive or insulting, is guilty of an offence if- (a)he intends thereby to stir up racial hatred, or (b)having regard to all the circumstances racial hatred is likely to be stirred up thereby." - Section 18 Public Order Act 1986 The legal framework for subjugating its population for thought crime has been in place for decades. This video is 4 years old and here we have the assistant to the commissioner state quite clearly he thinks there is nothing wrong with any of this. It is only going to get much, much worse. Already today we see people getting lengthy custodial sentences for posting facts that a judge has deemed likely to stir up racial hatred. 1984 is already here tl;dr we are fucked.
I'm not sure if this is a joke or not, regardless of the contents of this video, this is perhaps one of the most incorrect statements I've read in my entire life on this earth.
@@samgray2989 you are correct, but this kind iof thinking is the beginning of a new type of Gestapo/Stasi... it has to be stopped before it gets totaly out of hand
@@samgray2989 Exagerated, perhaps, but not incorrect. This IS something the SS would have come to your door about. Incorrect Thinking, that is. Britain is SUPPOSED to be a free country! After all, the home of Thomas Payne is the birthplace of the rights of Man! Freedom of expression and freedom of association are crucial to that concept. The behaviour of the Police in Britain is becoming alarmingly Orwellian!
With utterly incompetent police like this we are in serious trouble. You can tell he longs for just thinking to be made a crime. His power trip is elevated with every innocent member of the public he can arrest for doing nothing. Its literally imitating nazis.
Problem is that they are not just incompetent. They act more favourable to certain groups and that is wrong. All crimes are the same no matter who does them.
This problem goes back to Blair when he shoved loads of people into the NHS, who thought like him. The schools teachers have now been brainwashed to the Left in colleges. Other colleges are also pushing the Left agenda and will not allow other sides to put their point of view. When I took my Hons degree, the students were too scared to say if they supported the Tories and kept having Leftwing idiocy pushed at them. The younger ones would have capitulated.
You're the ones with the 2nd Amendment yet all you use it for is shooting at ever more ridiculous targets in the woods for RUclips videos instead of marching against your own tyrannical government.
Only in America is innocence assumed and guilt must be proven. Everywhere else is opposite. You are assumed guilty and must prove innocence. And now you see otherwise why America does things the way it does.
I too admire Mr. Whittle. Does that police officer think we are too thick to understand what a complainent is? It is terrible that police can collect details of NON CRIMES - what THEY call hate incidents. Sickening.
@@tubetorpedo Yes, even rape criminals are very seldom brought to court. Shoplifting is now something the police are not bothered about. Outrageous behavour.
Non Crime Hate Incident is one of the most Orwellian terms I've ever heard. Anything that isn't an actual Crime could be classed as a 'non crime'. And who decides what hate is? And how can Hate, an emotion, be a crime? Sorry, a non crime. Hate isn't a crime, so it technically is a non crime. But isn't Love also a non crime? It hurts my brain just think8ng about it. It's obviously a deliberately meaningless term that they can apply to anything they want, and it serves the state, not the citizens. We're living in scary times.
The UK has started thought policing just like the Germans did in the 30s and 40s... the CCCP also did this. Orwell would be stunned to see that his writing has come to life.
He wouldn't be surprised one bit. He understood the nature of evil and how the same people who desire fame, power, and wealth utilize it to gains those things.
He didn’t predict it, he was privy to the plan …. And they always share their plans…. That’s how everything that’s happening can be traced back to movies and novels and even “Predictions “ A particular “reality” can be manifested by seeding the ideas into the mass consciousness….. many of the ideas were introduced this way …. They also believe that as this “realm” has to have free will, we are considered to be a quiescent/ accepting the situation just by watching - reading and listening to their plans (via Hollywood and Books) so they’re off the Karmic- Hook and can proceed
When i was young in the 80s we had a Police FORCE that was respected or feared depending on your standing, it was famous allover the world as the best police force in the world!! Now we have a Police Service thats pathetic and embarrassing all in 40 years!!!
We also had them walking around our neighbourhoods to keep crime down. When I was a child in the 1950s, I was told to go to that local policeman if I was in trouble. You never see a policeman now.
"Hate crimes" are nothing more than "I don't like what you said" ... no one should be allowed to dictate anyones speech. Period. It's trouble in the UK, it's trouble in Canada.
No it's not at all. You don't even understand what you're talking about. Hate crimes are threatening minorities and individuals. Imagine being scared or anxious to go out in public because social media and communities are full of negative hateful language and media towards one of your personal traits. Get some empathy. No one should be put in that position
@@CYanideUK1 No, it's exactly as he said. Hate crimes are a substitute for real crimes. If someone had really committed a crime, you could just charge them with that. "Hate crime" is because a person hasn't done anything wrong, but people (like you) still want to punish them for wrongthink - i.e., for not having the same opinions as you. It's called fascism and totalitarianism. If you can't tolerate other people have different and contrary opinions to you, you don't belong in a free country. As Benjamin Franklin said, "those who would give up their freedom for safety deserve neither freedom nor safety."
@@CYanideUK1 I'm gay and in canada, I was there marching in parades when "Hate Crimes" were created. I've been attacked by Neo Nazis in the 90s, one pressed the muzzle of his gun to my forehead, and more. Don't try to tell me I do not know what I am talking about. I was the guy fighting for gay rights when you were suckling your moms T. What the laws are today is NOT what was originally created. It's been reworded to be vague. It used to be very specific. And now, you can charge someone with a hate crime even though there is no evidence of the crime happening because of the person making the complaint is gay. And whats worse is now words are considered violence and so speech now is considered a crime. It's wrong. Intent matters. They teach in uni that anything negative said against any minority is a hate crime. So if you disagree with someone who is a minority the left considers it a hate crime. Which is not the intent of the laws. But how they are used now. And thats in Canada. In the UK, it's worse. They should not exist. They are oppressive.
@@CYanideUK1 Oh and in the UK they aren't using the laws to help minorities, they are using them to oppress the people because they are unhappy with unfettered mass imigration, rape gangs attacking women and little girls, crime and more. Instead of dealing with the problem that are attacking their own citizens who speak out against it.
"our job is to provide a service that people can be confident in" Well, the police have completely lost my confidence as long as they're arresting people for thoughtcrimes.
@@PvtJoker308 However, when Governments change or bring in new laws, that directly support ideologies, the police themselves have a problem. This is the most likely reason we are seeing the highest levels of police officers leaving the service, ever. Unfortunately, most of the leavers are the ones, who do not want to support these ideologies, leaving us with the dross and the new recruits (who will only be accepted from certain demographics and ways of thinking).
It's actually feeling crimes, you hurt feelings I'm calling the poo poo. Thought police are popping up everywhere not just GB. Sad way to make to communism.
We have and they imprisoned the people. They are far more likely to arrest white people because the police etc want to be more diversive and show how not-racist they are. Except against whites of course.
Should we go to the commissioner's office to check his thinking? Did you hear what the dipstick said? He doesn't think the public might understand the word "complainant," and victim is one they understand more frequently. So, next time I want to complain about the food service, I'm not the complainant but the victim.
He didn't address the fact that for someone to be a 'victim' there has to be some harm done to them, usually a crime. If someone is a 'complainant' then that implies that no-one has yet established that any harm was done.
Gammons are all the same.. you've never heard a shot fired in anger, you've never put yourself in harm's way to protect people who'll never know you exist. You've never stood up for anything, you've no morals or principles, the only violence you've done it to that fourteen year old girl you've been tampering with when she told you last week that her new science teacher is nice so you battered her for making you feel insecure. You think that hard means buying a status dog from tiktok and wearing £400 trainers you made your mum buy you, even though she has no carpets on her floors and hasn't had a holiday in thirty years - the poor woman can't even buy herself a pair of AA batteries and a small bottle of tesco value baby oil, but you're not fussed as long as she buys your precious tobacco and happy shopper energy drinks, are you? You know what though? That's ok. You are ok. It's fine. When my Granddaddy and my Granduncle gave their lives assaulting the German bunkers protecting the bridge over the Caen canal at Benouville - renamed afterwards as *Pegasus Bridge* - they made that sacrifice for _you._ They paid the ultimate price so you can have your big apron belly in your nice soft tracksuit dressed like a baby, your precious cannabis and little balloons, watch chinese cartoons all day in your cosy bed. Even so you can say stupid shit like you just did, trying to act like you get credit for what the hardest men on the planet did whilse you sit there with the softest obesity boy titties on your whole housing scheme. The least you can do is show them some respect.
A lovely little missed opportunity there. The Commissioner said he hopes he is not being offensive....my dear Commissioner, that is not for you to decide, it is the "victim" to decide.
Exactly! I wonder if it would have changed anything, had he said that brilliant line. It seems nothing gets through to them. It's like they have no capacity for understanding the evil consequences of their actions. Is it just that they think, "I'm one of the good guys. We will only apply this to the people we don't like"? Of course, that IS evil itself. But maybe his IQ is so low that he has not the capacity to understand how human being work, how social situations change, and how cliques are formed, and how people abuse the power they CAN abuse, and that that is exactly why we (used to) have protections in law which prevent being charged with victimless crimes, "pre-crime", etc. etc. Because people used to understand that human beings put into positions of power will abuse that power to settle petty personal scores, enrich themselves, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. if they have the opportunity. I think either people like him are simply too stupid, or they have a gigantic blind spot which prevents them from understanding that evil is not something OUTSIDE and someone ELSE - it's within every human heart and the capacity to err and to do things you'll later regret is forever present no matter how much you think you've moved beyond such faults.
The police should be telling people who get offended by words to grow up, and tell them the saying “sticks and stones may break my bones but words can never hurt me
Their biggest get out clause, "I can't comment on this, it's a matter for.... " These BS artists need to be held accountable for gross negligence and serious corruption while on the job.
They use the term victim so you automatically sympathise with the person they want you to, which means you’re going to automatically have negative thoughts for the other person.
“The ship has sailed” sums up the police approach to everything. Whether it’s a law, a term, a method or a crime, there’s no point trying to change anything because it’s already happened. Why catch a burglar when the robbery is over? That ship has sailed…
Excellent questioning and astonishing answers from a chief of police. Even with a high court judge comparing the police in this instance to the Gestapo and Stasi, the police chief is still defending the police's approach to policing non-criminal record keeping and potentially ruining innocent peoples futures.
“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”
- Upton Sinclair
Sadly everyone seems willing to be bought today even when they know damn well that these politician 'ordered' thought police ... go against everything we once considered the basic human right to speak our minds, especially in the UK where taking the Pi** was a national pastime! It's Totalitarianism. Until the police and military refuse to comply to this absurdity and defend their families, friends and neighbors... we're scr*wed.
Brilliant quote!!!!
I think the quote would be more accurate if the word "understand" was replaced with "admit".
Spot on
Brilliant point
That copper got to where he is by being good at bullsh1t.
He certainly seems experienced in doublespeak.
Just a reminder: "Copper" came from the price of a bribe of the local constabulary. Pennies to look the other way.
he got there by sucking off sad dick khan and his friends aswell as overlooking crimes committed by them
That’s what Brits want. So when there’s a Rotherham and thousands of girls assaulted for years, you have this Chief to pretend through bs that nothing happened. Why don’t you all just surrender to Putin and the pop over to the pub.
I disagree. He is NOT good at it. Transparent, lying scum what he is.
Policing FEELINGS, but NOT Policing THEFT 😢
Or knife crime. Or mobile phone theft…
Using 1984 as a manual, unbelievable really.
We have the same problem in the USA, we're living nearly in a live version of "1984". If this Marxist Kamala Harris gets installed, all hell going to break out upon the citizens.
v for vendetta is also manual not a comic book.
@@alectricity3072 i think you both mean: "brave new world"
I actually had a coworker with a PhD in “international studies” tell me 2 and 2 can sometimes be 5.
@@Drareg-x3m That's some impressive mental gymnastics your coworker performed. Exactly what allows the erosion of our rights and freedoms while they tell you , it's for your own good..... 4 legs good 2 legs bad! 🐖
“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.”
― George Orwell
‘Members of the public wouldn’t understand the word complainant’
Wow. Clearly us plebs should be treated as such.
This guy is unbelievable
Offensive language should never be considered a crime.
I actually hate swearing but that is me.
Correct, absolutely.
It isn't just offensive language. It is offensive language towards the ruling class. These are persecutions from the ruling class down to political rivals.
However there should be some kind of evidence.
My wife is a nurse who has been trying to contact a patient with mental health issues for bowel cancer screening, but so far the individual has ignored 5 letters. Every time she phoned them up they say they need it in writing otherwise they can't do anything.
Don't worry, she hasn't told me any details.
She has come home upset now because the individual has acused her of being evil and locking them in a windowless room (ie shutting the office door during a patient interview.)
The office has a window she always opens, and she never locks the door, but this doesn't change the fact that one mentally unstable individual's imagination and inability to tell the difference between that and reality could potentially land my wife up to her kneck in charges and tribunals.
Police only chase a conviction, collect evidence and hand it over to the courts, they don't care if it's right or wrong. Junior Officers are just trying to build up their portfolio for promotion, so will try and create as severe a case as they can from anything.
They say there's no smoke without fire, but police today don't seem to be able to tell when it's just foggy 🤷♂️
@@littlenan3576 Of course, in a free country you're free to hate it. But on the other side one should be free to swear. It's when we start policing speech do we become no better than Nazis.
This policeman doesn’t even see the problem with this situation
He is the problem!
Brainwashed
The COP is thinking 🤔 he’s got the right to tell people what to and how to think? I think he’s becoming deranged on his power trip!
He does know what he’s saying is insane; but he’s being paid very well to push such illogical rubbish
@@hulagirl1176 He is brainwashed. Its been going around though the governments aren't working on a vaccine.
As a lawyer, I have long been troubled by the use of the term "victim" in place of complainant.
If they want to use a term for the masses it should actually be "wannabe victim" 😆
What have you done about it?
@@erikascheepers2375yes they shpuld especially given the number of false allegations…false allegation because “their feelings were hurt”..
Y
"When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty." - Thomas Jefferson
They said a lot of wise, true things, those Founding Fathers.
Brilliant mastermind that Thomas Jefferson and great historian for remembering it! Being a great human is acting upon it... God keep you safe!!!
I think we are getting there. F the WEF.
Thats a good post sir !! Now your cooking !
The government you vote for is the government you deserve. - Thomas Jefferson
"We're here to check your thinking."
But who has checked HIS thinking?!
Me 😂
That is exactly what I thought too. If a cop came to my door and said that, I'd be inclined to reply that I find his speech offensive, so F off!
Probably a very disturbed alfabet person
@@BigLeBowski4456 He's likely a brainwashed puppet of "The Party". He's toeing the line to keep his job because his union has ordered him to obey these rules (they too, are members of the The Party).
@@DavidSimpson-dm9kf although funny just stand up for yourself hopefully peacefully lol I just told a cop to shut up last night because he told me to shut up haha and spoken to the sarg who's not on a power trip and actually nice lol
I clearly come from another generation. I grew up being told “sticks and stones will break your bones but names will never hurt me”.
Me too my friend but nowadays a serous offence is misgendering someone or be patriotic!!!
Words. Words will never hurt me.
Here we have a senior police officer behaving like a politician. He will not give a direct answer to the question asked of him. How can you have a 'victim', if there is no crime ?
Cops, especially when they are not at the lowest level, are just politicians with guns. The archaic ideology of protecting the public/serving the people hasn’t existed for a while. It’s about power and control.
👍👍
That’s why this guy should be removed from his position, due to lack of confidence in his command. Just like somebody driving a ship. You get rid of enough of these guys and all this politician police chief stuff goes out the window. Instead encourages word, salad fights instead of just cutting off the cancer and sending a message to the police that it’s not good for your career to play politician.
He’s the “victim” of hurt feelings.
If the law or understanding of it is altered or manipulated so that there is a crime, is there now a victim?
That’s a professional liar. He should be fired, stripped,of his pension, and prosecuted for crimes against his country.
dereliction of duty
Psychopath.
Investigated for being a nonce too. Almost certainly is one.
Why do you think he has the job
Although I don't like the idea of these ppl rule over the regular ppl I still think that the issue is not him but the Government.
Somehow they at down with the Police but the police just apply the rules. Some othe loony came up with an idea and put that into a law... :)
Instead of Defund the police we should defund the Government. Or at least make them accountible because they nowhere neer accountible
Absolutely absurd that this is happening in a modern, western country. England needs to sort this out before it’s too late
already is late. how long did this whole case go-on before one descent human being finally challenged them on it. This should have never even started in the first place...
The fact this hearing has occurred tells us that it already is too late.
We have been pursuing foreign immigration for 50+ years. And if you widen the pool of identity groups and weaken the bonds of common feeling within the population then you are inevitably going to increase calls for the regulation of speech. Think of it like a dinner party. The more weirdos you invite the more likely you are to have a barney and for the owner of the house to announce "lets not talk about politics". Freedom under the law as elaborated in the U.S, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Britain arose out of the particular White Anglo Saxon Protestant people who dominated those countries. It wont survive immigration. What we will get in the medium term is a managed anarcho tyranny. And in the long term the future will be defined by whichever ethno-cultural group gets all its ducks in a row - in Britain that will be either a native revival or an Islamic rival power structure
Never seen a man trying so hard to keep his job, regardless of the cost to the people he is supposed to protect.
People who seek out positions of power rarely do so because of altruism.
police job is not to protect but to enforce the laws. it's alwys been like this. don't believe the slogans they use.
Probably trying hard to keep the photos of himself and some minor in bed together at the Masonic temple from being leaked by the people pulling his strings.
THE COLLEGE OF POLICEING SHOULD BE DISBANDED IMMEDIATELY
Yes, it has ended up in effect a parallel to parliament creating laws. It doesn't create laws but directs how the police interpret them. In this case it directs white man bad, everyone else good.
When I was inn the police the rank and file knew the college of policing as the sausage factory
@@johnfisher4872Who pays for it?
👍👍👍👍👍👍
I wouldn't go that far but a change in policy for sure
This video Still even more valid today. What a country we have become
“If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-for ever.” ― George Orwell, 1984
Absolutely disgraceful. He should be sacked
So get on with it already.
This NPC is only a symptom.
This was 4 years ago so no he did not get sacked
If you refer to the complainant in a criminal trial as “the victim”, the defence counsel will immediately object on the grounds that such language is plainly prejudicial, and that fact is so obvious and uncontroversial that any judge will immediately uphold the objection without a second thought.
And yet this man seriously expects anyone to believe he doesn’t understand why “victim”, in a scenario where not only has nobody been charged, but no crime has even been committed, is inappropriately loaded language?
This is the country that gave us the Magna Carta……how shameful
Don't get too hung up on Magna Carta. It was created to protect the powerful and wealthy so they could rule their little empires without royal intervention. It was never about the ordinary common people.
And it gave us the Magna Carta at the sharp end of pointy things like swords and spears.
They lost god, meaning theyve lost their societal foundations
@@brianshea4177
That's how freedom was earned by those who are free. It's those who accept life under tyranny who are afraid to fight.
@@brianshea4177seem we need one with our democratically elected governments too!
I never, in my wildest dreams as a child in the 1980's could have imagined the MET would become the Stasi. Yet here we are, and this was FOUR years ago!!
One day our country will be liberated and all the files written about us will be available for us to see. At present a dossier is gradually being constructed. There is social engineering being enacted.
America has a Stasi, I think it reasonable to assume the same exists in the other
Five Eyes
@@uradragonlook at who’s been running NATO since its founding.most of them were x nazi officers.
Women cops more than a minority has changed the whole culture. Men working with them either overly protective or simps. If actual violent crime happens Im yet to see a woman acting as decent back up.
Exactly
Cannot believe the crazy scary times we are living in!
Freedom of speech & free thought is everything!!!
Wow! A requirement to become a senior police officer is to be incredibly mealy-mouthed and stricken with fuzzy thinking.
This demonstrates, where we are today. The judge in this case showed common sense and justice. This high ranking officer is being evasive. This is a dangerous road for free speech.
Fuck that, this is dangerous for humanity.
Hes being evasive because the incident did not happen in his force.
Free speech is dead in UK.
We are headed towards complete surveillance. Most likely it will be fully implemented after a false flag, that way the general population will "understand" the need for such surveillance. To play devil's advocate, I understand why a farmer would want to keep track of their cattle. Make no mistake, to the entity running the world, we are cattle.
@@mrb9849on this occasion... :-/
All these corrupt police chiefs and their lackeys need to be brought to justice
Ask this Police Chief what the clearance rates on actual crimes are. He is a joke and a disgrace to any law enforcement officer anywhere in the world.
Give up you plum, Do you really think that the police want to investigate tweets. If a crime is reported, it's their duty to investigate it. It's not the police's problem that the population has decided that it's now ok to report tweets to the police is now acceptable. The police can't win, if they investigate they are Orwellien, if they don't they are useless. They can't win either way. So you don't have a clue what your talking about.
So admire Peter Whittle. Shame no longer will ever be able to say same about police & their 2 tier way of behaving.
You can fight for your rights. Starmer will not be re-elected. Make your voice heard at every election, by-election, council, referendums, anything to get the msg thru to Labour. Tories failed to listen and we had 14 years of them, so we can survive 5 years of Starmer, if we have to.
@@therealpollyanna5846 They don't have elections. They have theatre performances where the pleebs go and pretend they have say. They don't; and because they are disarmed, they are at the mercy of their tyrannical government whose main goal is to depopulate down to an easily controlled population of slaves they can do whatever they like too without consequences. For years, Brits have been telling me how stupid I was for demanding my God and Guns. How smart are you feeling now as your nation descends into an Orwellian nightmare? The "conspiracy theorists," were and still are correct about everything. Everything. However evil and twisted you think our WEF global Komm-U-nist-controlled governments are... the truth is far far worse.
Ridiculous guideline why is this man with his poor judgements a senior police officer. Surely reforms of the police are required?
They should be demanding he resign or get fired.
Even though this was years ago in instances like this retirement should not be an option
Every police office that complies with this stupidity should must be named and shamed. "I was just doing my job" is the language of those trying to divorce themselves of responsibility when they know what they are doing is wrong and morally corrupt.
Make him drink water straight from the Thames.
“They”? Who the F do you think put him there?
It's getting worse
George Orwell could not have been more pinpoint accurate
To me, it's frightening how this man could not grasp the concept. So ingrained in this new way of thinking.
“In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”
― George Orwell
Fake quote, Orwell never said that. If you think it's real, tell us where he said it. 78 people who've never read Orwell gave this a thumbs up.
@@PutItAway101
Somebody said it. If not Orwell....who? It's well known. I guess we'll have to give credit to one who's known as "Anonymous". A lot of sayings have been attributed to "Anonymous".
In other words, it's NOT a fake quote. Someone did say it but NOT Orwell. Now, that we have that straightened out, is there some truth to that statement? THAT is the real question. Arguing over the author doesn't disprove OR prove the validity of that statement.
@@JackHaveman52 it is a fake quote, because it's being attributed to someone who didn't say it, a false source. What it is, is a meme. It's something that people keep saying, but nobody knows who said it, or if it even was said by a noteworthy person in a "quotable" context (i.e. a speech, an interview or a formal piece of writing), so it's just a meme. When I go to the toilet I often say to myself "drop the stupid fucking jobby, I have places to be". Is this a quote? No, because nobody gives a toss about me.
@@JasonSpielberg
"Meme" is different than an anonymous quote. There is such a thing, you know. There are also songs and stories that have "Anonymous" as their author.
All anonymous means is that we don't know who actually coined the saying. Usually, one can figure out the one who creates a meme. You can google "anonymous quotes" and you'll find lots of sites and thousands of quotes with no known author.
If, for some reason, your bathroom saying takes off, because I repeat it and everyone starts using it and I never tell anyone who first said it, it will become an anonymous quote. Another one of thousands of them.
Don't get so excited. Why does this saying upset you so much? It's just an expression. Who cares who said it.
@@JackHaveman52 it's not framed as an anonymous quote though, it's framed as a George Orwell quote, so it's a fake quote. Songs and stories are not quotes either, they're songs and stories, by anonymous authors. You can still tell they were written by actual writers, by reading the whole-ass book and judging its quality, unlike an anonymous quote which could have been written by anyone.
So-called "Anonymous quotes" themselves are also fake quotes. They certainly can't be considered legitimate quotes, especially if you can produce no record of them having ever being uttered in anything other than a post on the internet.
I'm not upset either, I think perhaps you would like me to be upset because it brings you pleasure, which I can understand as I too enjoy causing suffering unto others, but it's impossible in this case. I don't remember the last time I ever felt upset about anything, actually. I'm certainly not upset here anyway, I just think you're wrong.
“Victim” implies they’ve had a crime committed against them.
That was in this video.
Yup,language and definitions have been changed to mean the opposite. Brainwashing and social engineering out of control.
It’s a non crime so how can there be a victim.
Ezactly!
The woke word is “victim”, common sense says complainant.
A “victim” is a person on the receiving end of a crime. If there has been no crime, only a hate incident, then there can be no victim.
A “complainant” is someone who believes a crime, or wrongdoing, has been committed against them, but has yet to have that proven.
There should be no such thing as a non crime hate incident. It’s such a BS term designed purely save the feelings of people ill-equipped to deal with the realities of modern day life.
Has this man ever done real police work like walking the streets ,arresting criminals,chasing bank robbers.?
You cannot do those things sat down monitoring Facebook
lol. if you were a crim, would you not just laugh in his face? i am laughing at the nonce anyway,
Just 13 year olds and young girls with special needs...
Too dangerous, he might have gotten hurt going after real criminals.
He covers the feelings beat.
Frightening,... anyone vote for this b.s?
Calling a complainant a victim is equivalent to calling the other party guilty.
Absolutely!
This 'senior' copper has as much substance as a wet paper towel. God help you England.
Yes, God help us indeed.
If it is not a crime then the police should not be involved, simple as that.
Meanwhile they are escorting illegals while they destroy and terrorise communities. Body language showing the lying.
Absolutely
The don’t seem to think that people who are robbed, burgled, or have their cars stolen, are victims. Don’t bother to turn up.
Nicely said. And it's just that simple.
The British government has once again forgotten their history. Dark days...
And not just the UK. All WEF aligned countries re doing this.
Well, I believe Rape convictions are about 0.1%
"I'd like to think I'm not being offensive" - that instantly defeats the proposition that offence is defined by the "victim"s feelings.
"Have I committed a crime officer?" No. "Then F off!" Offensive or insulting language is not a crime. And no one can be trusted as a neutral arbiter. What one calls hateful, another calls accurately observing reality. This copper is happy to enforce thought and language policing in the vain of Orwells "1984".
"Officer, your suggestion that this type of policing is justified, is insulting and offensive. Please arrest yourself."
Actually since 2003 offending or insulting someone digitally in the UK is a crime. Thousands (no exaggeration) of UK citizens are arrested every year quite literally for mean tweets and insulting facebook posts etc.
"A person is guilty of an offence if he-
(a)sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character" -section 127 Communications Act 2003
It has been a crime for much longer if the insult is likely to "stir up racial hatred";
"A person who uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening, abusive or insulting, is guilty of an offence if-
(a)he intends thereby to stir up racial hatred, or
(b)having regard to all the circumstances racial hatred is likely to be stirred up thereby." - Section 18 Public Order Act 1986
The legal framework for subjugating its population for thought crime has been in place for decades. This video is 4 years old and here we have the assistant to the commissioner state quite clearly he thinks there is nothing wrong with any of this. It is only going to get much, much worse. Already today we see people getting lengthy custodial sentences for posting facts that a judge has deemed likely to stir up racial hatred. 1984 is already here
tl;dr we are fucked.
@@jameshotham95 - This is why the police are not clearing up physical crimes in the real world. Sickening!!
As a retired police officer I can say what a shame the police don’t check their own behaviour and thinking before they continue down this route.
Common sense doesn’t apply 🤡🤡🤪🤪
It's gone too far for that. Don't you realise there is a whole generation who have been indoctrinated and think like him?
Don't act like you're on the citizen's side in this.
If a cop came up to me and said he is checking my thoughts or thinking, I'd say I'm thinking about the high cost of groceries these days.
Amazing how people in authority can distance themselves from the actions of their organizations.
Our cowardly corrupt Police make the Ss look humane.
I'm not sure if this is a joke or not, regardless of the contents of this video, this is perhaps one of the most incorrect statements I've read in my entire life on this earth.
@@samgray2989
you are correct, but this kind iof thinking is the beginning of a new type of Gestapo/Stasi... it has to be stopped before it gets totaly out of hand
@@samgray2989 Thought police falls in the category of an oppressive police force. So, no it is not an incorrect statement.
@@samgray2989 Exagerated, perhaps, but not incorrect. This IS something the SS would have come to your door about. Incorrect Thinking, that is. Britain is SUPPOSED to be a free country! After all, the home of Thomas Payne is the birthplace of the rights of Man! Freedom of expression and freedom of association are crucial to that concept. The behaviour of the Police in Britain is becoming alarmingly Orwellian!
Is that the nazi ss? Here in the US - the Secret Service tried to kill our once and future president.
There's something seriously wrong with people. The fact that so many people don't see it, indicates they are them.
The age of horrors continues.
This was 4 years ago, things have ONLY gotten WORSE
With utterly incompetent police like this we are in serious trouble. You can tell he longs for just thinking to be made a crime. His power trip is elevated with every innocent member of the public he can arrest for doing nothing. Its literally imitating nazis.
Problem is that they are not just incompetent. They act more favourable to certain groups and that is wrong. All crimes are the same no matter who does them.
This problem goes back to Blair when he shoved loads of people into the NHS, who thought like him. The schools teachers have now been brainwashed to the Left in colleges. Other colleges are also pushing the Left agenda and will not allow other sides to put their point of view. When I took my Hons degree, the students were too scared to say if they supported the Tories and kept having Leftwing idiocy pushed at them. The younger ones would have capitulated.
And its not his problem ...... cause stupid laws were passed by st.....politicians.
This commissioner is a danger to British freedom!
As an American i feel like my parents (UK) are losing their minds! C’mon Brits…fight this nonsense!!!
......and I wish I'd left my abusive UK home and gone to live with the kids😂😭😭😭
They won't fight. They'll just keep politely complaining 💀
Yet america has trump and biden.... lol
Americans are not much better...look around.
You're the ones with the 2nd Amendment yet all you use it for is shooting at ever more ridiculous targets in the woods for RUclips videos instead of marching against your own tyrannical government.
Time to arrest these crooked cops.
I've been to England twice and will never go back after their banning of 'certain' speech. Shameful....
I do not blame you. We will get free speech back again.
The word "Victim" automatically assumes that the accused is guilty, and should never be used in an investigation, only a conviction.
Only in America is innocence assumed and guilt must be proven. Everywhere else is opposite. You are assumed guilty and must prove innocence. And now you see otherwise why America does things the way it does.
Don't forget we're all so ignorant we don't know the difference between a victim and a complainant!
Precisely. Only a court can decide who is a victim.
The police must have a lot of time on their hands while London is Falling
Extremely concerning English law has come to this. The citizens of the UK need to wake up before it’s too late.
Just about waking up now.
I too admire Mr. Whittle. Does that police officer think we are too thick to understand what a complainent is? It is terrible that police can collect details of NON CRIMES - what THEY call hate incidents. Sickening.
Same time when they are using resources to solving those non crimes, their track record of solving ACTUAL crimes does not seem too too high.
@@tubetorpedo Yes, even rape criminals are very seldom brought to court. Shoplifting is now something the police are not bothered about. Outrageous behavour.
Yes; well done Mr Whittle for questioning the outrageous behaviour of police actually visiting someone to "check his thinking."
Non Crime Hate Incident is one of the most Orwellian terms I've ever heard.
Anything that isn't an actual Crime could be classed as a 'non crime'.
And who decides what hate is? And how can Hate, an emotion, be a crime? Sorry, a non crime.
Hate isn't a crime, so it technically is a non crime. But isn't Love also a non crime?
It hurts my brain just think8ng about it.
It's obviously a deliberately meaningless term that they can apply to anything they want, and it serves the state, not the citizens.
We're living in scary times.
Its not his fault. The ridiculous non hate crime, that law was passed by incompetent politicians. Please talk to them.
that policeman has utterly lost the grasp of society and is an astounding coward.
This police officer is a disgrace for upholding thought crime.
A man has just been found guilty of praying silently in his head outside an abortion clinic.
The UK has started thought policing just like the Germans did in the 30s and 40s... the CCCP also did this. Orwell would be stunned to see that his writing has come to life.
funny how USSR in cyrillic is almost like CCP...
They also do it
He would not be stunned, he predicted this path. He would be saddened that his works could not deter this future.
He wouldn't be surprised one bit. He understood the nature of evil and how the same people who desire fame, power, and wealth utilize it to gains those things.
Airstrip One in the book was never Britain. Its not fitting of a proper party member to remember that.
He didn’t predict it, he was privy to the plan …. And they always share their plans…. That’s how everything that’s happening can be traced back to movies and novels and even “Predictions “
A particular “reality” can be manifested by seeding the ideas into the mass consciousness….. many of the ideas were introduced this way …. They also believe that as this “realm” has to have free will, we are considered to be a quiescent/ accepting the situation just by watching - reading and listening to their plans (via Hollywood and Books) so they’re off the Karmic- Hook and can proceed
We are looking at everything wrong with Britain.
Outside power inside power trapped compressed explosions.
I think were a circle of people and outside the circle is the power eating our souls daily.
When i was young in the 80s we had a Police FORCE that was respected or feared depending on your standing, it was famous allover the world as the best police force in the world!! Now we have a Police Service thats pathetic and embarrassing all in 40 years!!!
We also had them walking around our neighbourhoods to keep crime down. When I was a child in the 1950s, I was told to go to that local policeman if I was in trouble. You never see a policeman now.
That police chief needs to have his thinking checked.
Or his bumps felt.
Absolutely.a true psychopath who is lying and obfuscating.
He needs to go on a ‘course’
@@RayWilliams-ui7gwa course of antipsychotics
No wonder the British public have lost all respect for the police.
He's not qualified to wear a police uniform!
"Hate crimes" are nothing more than "I don't like what you said" ... no one should be allowed to dictate anyones speech. Period. It's trouble in the UK, it's trouble in Canada.
No it's not at all. You don't even understand what you're talking about. Hate crimes are threatening minorities and individuals. Imagine being scared or anxious to go out in public because social media and communities are full of negative hateful language and media towards one of your personal traits. Get some empathy. No one should be put in that position
Amen.
@@CYanideUK1 No, it's exactly as he said. Hate crimes are a substitute for real crimes. If someone had really committed a crime, you could just charge them with that. "Hate crime" is because a person hasn't done anything wrong, but people (like you) still want to punish them for wrongthink - i.e., for not having the same opinions as you. It's called fascism and totalitarianism. If you can't tolerate other people have different and contrary opinions to you, you don't belong in a free country. As Benjamin Franklin said, "those who would give up their freedom for safety deserve neither freedom nor safety."
@@CYanideUK1 I'm gay and in canada, I was there marching in parades when "Hate Crimes" were created. I've been attacked by Neo Nazis in the 90s, one pressed the muzzle of his gun to my forehead, and more. Don't try to tell me I do not know what I am talking about. I was the guy fighting for gay rights when you were suckling your moms T.
What the laws are today is NOT what was originally created.
It's been reworded to be vague. It used to be very specific. And now, you can charge someone with a hate crime even though there is no evidence of the crime happening because of the person making the complaint is gay.
And whats worse is now words are considered violence and so speech now is considered a crime.
It's wrong. Intent matters. They teach in uni that anything negative said against any minority is a hate crime. So if you disagree with someone who is a minority the left considers it a hate crime.
Which is not the intent of the laws. But how they are used now.
And thats in Canada. In the UK, it's worse. They should not exist. They are oppressive.
@@CYanideUK1 Oh and in the UK they aren't using the laws to help minorities, they are using them to oppress the people because they are unhappy with unfettered mass imigration, rape gangs attacking women and little girls, crime and more. Instead of dealing with the problem that are attacking their own citizens who speak out against it.
So victim, not complainant, guilty until proven innocent…..what a joke our law has become
The amount of complex language and laws they put out and he thinks the public can't understand the word complainant 🙄
The senior Official that do not want to answer should be removed from his position because here is a case of policy within the police and freedom
"our job is to provide a service that people can be confident in"
Well, the police have completely lost my confidence as long as they're arresting people for thoughtcrimes.
Their job is to enforce law. Not to enforce ideology.
@@PvtJoker308 However, when Governments change or bring in new laws, that directly support ideologies, the police themselves have a problem. This is the most likely reason we are seeing the highest levels of police officers leaving the service, ever. Unfortunately, most of the leavers are the ones, who do not want to support these ideologies, leaving us with the dross and the new recruits (who will only be accepted from certain demographics and ways of thinking).
It's actually feeling crimes, you hurt feelings I'm calling the poo poo. Thought police are popping up everywhere not just GB. Sad way to make to communism.
The Met has been a cesspit since the 70s.
The outrages committed during Cressida Dicks tenure showed clearly that the swamp needed draining.
And all the violence crime? Or islamists?
ENGLAND SCOTLAND STANDS WITH YOU 💯✊🏴🏴🇨🇮🇬🇧
Great to hear. Thankyou so much for the support.
Would hope so because you have the same problem coming 😂
@@BirdiesSkateboardingwe already have this hate speech nonsense up here. Just waiting on the armies of illegal migrants to appear.
your all communist together thank god America is done supporting you 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Thanks guys we all need to stick together 😊
You would have thought the moment this was aired that the whole Orwellian facade would instantly crumble. But four years later, it is getting worse.
Absolutly discracful and quite scary .
And here we are, "Offensive language" to jail! "Wrong think", TO JAIL!
Re-education camp.
Sack him! Force him to resign!
"A service that people can be confident in" What an absolute JOKE!!!
Britain needs to stand up and stop this BS
Have you met people in Britain? They still salute magpies and watch gogglebox. Don’t get your hopes up.
We have and they imprisoned the people. They are far more likely to arrest white people because the police etc want to be more diversive and show how not-racist they are. Except against whites of course.
That commissioner is dodging and paying lip service to this enquiry.
I think the people need to start checking the police, politicians, lawyers and judges thinking. That's the way it should be not their way.
We did once, and called it journalism. Journalism died when the 1% took over global media outlets.
It’s about time somebody in authority for the cause of sanity put these questions to offending authorities
Should we go to the commissioner's office to check his thinking? Did you hear what the dipstick said? He doesn't think the public might understand the word "complainant," and victim is one they understand more frequently. So, next time I want to complain about the food service, I'm not the complainant but the victim.
Thinks the public is completely stupid.
They consider themselves above us all when they appear as thick as 2 short planks.
Banning hate is equally as ludicrous to banning love. Both are part of being Human. No one is perfect and we're not designed to be.
Well said👏👏👏👍🏴
There would be no “hate crimes” if our country wasn’t being invaded!
He didn't address the fact that for someone to be a 'victim' there has to be some harm done to them, usually a crime. If someone is a 'complainant' then that implies that no-one has yet established that any harm was done.
So, why did we storm the beaches of Normandy?....
Gammons are all the same.. you've never heard a shot fired in anger, you've never put yourself in harm's way to protect people who'll never know you exist. You've never stood up for anything, you've no morals or principles, the only violence you've done it to that fourteen year old girl you've been tampering with when she told you last week that her new science teacher is nice so you battered her for making you feel insecure. You think that hard means buying a status dog from tiktok and wearing £400 trainers you made your mum buy you, even though she has no carpets on her floors and hasn't had a holiday in thirty years - the poor woman can't even buy herself a pair of AA batteries and a small bottle of tesco value baby oil, but you're not fussed as long as she buys your precious tobacco and happy shopper energy drinks, are you? You know what though? That's ok. You are ok. It's fine. When my Granddaddy and my Granduncle gave their lives assaulting the German bunkers protecting the bridge over the Caen canal at Benouville - renamed afterwards as *Pegasus Bridge* - they made that sacrifice for _you._ They paid the ultimate price so you can have your big apron belly in your nice soft tracksuit dressed like a baby, your precious cannabis and little balloons, watch chinese cartoons all day in your cosy bed. Even so you can say stupid shit like you just did, trying to act like you get credit for what the hardest men on the planet did whilse you sit there with the softest obesity boy titties on your whole housing scheme. The least you can do is show them some respect.
What ever happened to sticks and stones will break my bones, but names will never hurt me.
Legacy media calls that a conspiracy theory
I agree butt hurt feeling my ass.
George Carlin called it pussification.
The easily offended are easily manipulated.
This WEF copper needs to be sacked
And this was four years ago and now it’s even worse! This needs to be shut down immediately!!!😮😮😮
A lovely little missed opportunity there. The Commissioner said he hopes he is not being offensive....my dear Commissioner, that is not for you to decide, it is the "victim" to decide.
Yes exactly if applied under this ridiculous law he talks about and mentions...
Exactly! I wonder if it would have changed anything, had he said that brilliant line. It seems nothing gets through to them. It's like they have no capacity for understanding the evil consequences of their actions. Is it just that they think, "I'm one of the good guys. We will only apply this to the people we don't like"? Of course, that IS evil itself. But maybe his IQ is so low that he has not the capacity to understand how human being work, how social situations change, and how cliques are formed, and how people abuse the power they CAN abuse, and that that is exactly why we (used to) have protections in law which prevent being charged with victimless crimes, "pre-crime", etc. etc. Because people used to understand that human beings put into positions of power will abuse that power to settle petty personal scores, enrich themselves, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. if they have the opportunity. I think either people like him are simply too stupid, or they have a gigantic blind spot which prevents them from understanding that evil is not something OUTSIDE and someone ELSE - it's within every human heart and the capacity to err and to do things you'll later regret is forever present no matter how much you think you've moved beyond such faults.
The police should be telling people who get offended by words to grow up, and tell them the saying “sticks and stones may break my bones but words can never hurt me
Their biggest get out clause, "I can't comment on this, it's a matter for.... " These BS artists need to be held accountable for gross negligence and serious corruption while on the job.
Sadly it’s happening all through the west.
They use the term victim so you automatically sympathise with the person they want you to, which means you’re going to automatically have negative thoughts for the other person.
That senior officer should immediately join the labour party.
For him to avoid the question and squirm around the obvious issue here should be a capital offense
WOW. this guy is channeling the Gestapo, Stasi, and KGB all at one time in the most boring bureaucratese possible.
This cop is absolutely supportive of this nonsense. The UK is so screwed.
When are they going to realise that a Guidance is NOT law!
👏👏👏
“The ship has sailed” sums up the police approach to everything. Whether it’s a law, a term, a method or a crime, there’s no point trying to change anything because it’s already happened. Why catch a burglar when the robbery is over? That ship has sailed…
Brilliant point..... complainant NOT victim.
The thought, belief and feeling Police. 🤬
Excellent questioning and astonishing answers from a chief of police. Even with a high court judge comparing the police in this instance to the Gestapo and Stasi, the police chief is still defending the police's approach to policing non-criminal record keeping and potentially ruining innocent peoples futures.