Not only can't tell the difference, but prefer it the cheaper way! Unless they're getting an actual bill for the ingredients used and pay the cook seperately, I wouldn't say it's unethical (tbh in very few cases would it be, anyone who can afford a private chef can dole out a bit more cash) or even dishonest
This is how I feel when Im at work and someone praises about a dish I made. Im currently working at a college kitchen until I can get my aemed guard card, and most of the tiem when I gst finished cooking a dish (that isnt pizza, because during dinner thats my main thing I focus on) Im told how good it is. Hell when we have a nasty calzone like a "spinach and artichoke" or "bacon and broccoli" I can make it look DAMN good.
They probably did go to Europe, but you’re absolutely right, who the fuck uses red wine to cook for every meal? Certainly not whoever was serving them originally
OP is a personal chef for people though. And by the story her clients, they sound rich because OP said they originally dropped 1000's on ingredients and usually personal chefs are given a food budget to get ingredients or are reimbursed for purchases when they get paid. (My cousin did catering for a bit, and the mayor actually often hired her for special events so I'm using her experience for the analogy) So its not so much about saving money (although thats a great side effect) as to making whatever dishes her clients want when they want it (if they're paying her to be on call)
OP is a personal chef for clients, and they sound rich because OP said they originally dropped 1000's on ingredients and usually personal chefs are given a food budget to get ingredients or are reimbursed for purchases when they get paid. (My cousin did catering for a bit and the mayor actually often hired her for special events so I'm using her experience for the analogy) So say they're the type of family that has a contract "We'll pay you XXX to make YYY amount of meals." Then if they pay OP ahead of time and she saves on ingredients but they get the meal they wanted, well, then its not really illegal as OP is fulfilling the contract.
honestly, fair, completely fair, if they cant tell the difference then you dont need to waste your money and time
Scamming the rich is based
@@concept8192 It's not scamming if they're providing exactly what they wanted
@ true... more like manipulating the rich is based
Not only can't tell the difference, but prefer it the cheaper way! Unless they're getting an actual bill for the ingredients used and pay the cook seperately, I wouldn't say it's unethical (tbh in very few cases would it be, anyone who can afford a private chef can dole out a bit more cash) or even dishonest
This is how I feel when Im at work and someone praises about a dish I made. Im currently working at a college kitchen until I can get my aemed guard card, and most of the tiem when I gst finished cooking a dish (that isnt pizza, because during dinner thats my main thing I focus on) Im told how good it is. Hell when we have a nasty calzone like a "spinach and artichoke" or "bacon and broccoli" I can make it look DAMN good.
Those people never went to Europe, who the fuck is going to use red wine to cook a day to day meal?
They probably did go to Europe, but you’re absolutely right, who the fuck uses red wine to cook for every meal? Certainly not whoever was serving them originally
I like to imagine this is a mom talking about her children
This is exactly why I avoid any meal that is over $20. There's nothing in a sigular meal that is going to be enhanced by it being over $20.
You're just cheap dude, that's okay. There's cuts of meat alone that cost more than $20, but if you're happy with worse cuts than you go
@@Northernheros and you would spend more than $20 on a cut of meat?
Most beef cuts are $20 or around there@@megastartitan
I don’t want your $20 lobster lol
OP is a personal chef for people though. And by the story her clients, they sound rich because OP said they originally dropped 1000's on ingredients and usually personal chefs are given a food budget to get ingredients or are reimbursed for purchases when they get paid. (My cousin did catering for a bit, and the mayor actually often hired her for special events so I'm using her experience for the analogy)
So its not so much about saving money (although thats a great side effect) as to making whatever dishes her clients want when they want it (if they're paying her to be on call)
money can't buy class
I think this might be illegal though it doesn’t bother me if I am right or wrong in this case
OP is a personal chef for clients, and they sound rich because OP said they originally dropped 1000's on ingredients and usually personal chefs are given a food budget to get ingredients or are reimbursed for purchases when they get paid. (My cousin did catering for a bit and the mayor actually often hired her for special events so I'm using her experience for the analogy)
So say they're the type of family that has a contract "We'll pay you XXX to make YYY amount of meals." Then if they pay OP ahead of time and she saves on ingredients but they get the meal they wanted, well, then its not really illegal as OP is fulfilling the contract.
making the food they like? is op suppose to keep making expensive food they dont like? op job is to make the customer happy they are happy
Username says all
How much you feeding them to save thousands
With how expensive some of the fancy proper the ingredients are, it would only take a few months to save thousands
Hero