I have this product. It’s 100w max when using 1 USB C port, but 150w max when using more than 1 port. If it interests you, Anker does offer a charger that does look much like this one, but only has 1 USB C port and is 140w max. I am still pleased with this product.
I'm encountering slow charger attached message for my Lenovo laptop 65W even if that''s the only thing plugged in. Is this normal? Didn't use to happen with my Anker 735
Note that the Anker 747 has issues charging many Lenovo laptops such as Lenovo Yoga 9i and Slim Pro. I have 6 chargers which are able to charge at 100 watts or more but the Anker 747 is only able to charge up to 13 watts on my Lenovo 9i whereas the rest can charge up to 90+ watts. Apparently there are some compatibility issues between Anker and some Lenovo laptops. These incompatibility issues are also mentioned in reddit by Anker users
This is duo to charger types. I owned 2 100w chargers. One from baseus and one from Anker. The baseus one charged my rog ally (65w max) just fine, but the Anker only did 12v 20w. I believe This is just a charger profile issue as my Anker was pps and the baseus was not
That's probably because your Dell laptop doesn't support the same protocol that this charger has, the laptop doesn't call the correct protocol to signal the charger that it needs 130W I guess that maybe the dell only calls the protocol that transfer 20 - 65w from the charger
Regarding Anker's flagship charger "747" is packed with superior technologies that set it apart from the competition such as having GaN3 instead of GaN2 and power IQ4.0 instead of power IQ3.0 All this explains why the Anker is smaller and lighter than other chargers yet have more ports(4) and power(150w) than the competition such as Apple. And if you own both the anker 747 charger and the ugreen nexode 200w charger like I do, you'll notice that the anker is exactly half the size and weight compared to the ugreen, which means if you use 2 anker's together you'll get 300w of power and have 8 ports vs ugreen having 200w and 6 ports. So with that said, it's obvious that anker's superior technology makes it more space efficient than the ugreen.
Good tech content, but would suggest not hand holding camera or divice, too much waving about. Swap the busy brick background for a plain neutral 18% gray. The busy bricks kept drawing attention away from the presentation. Suggest tripod shot to table to fix camera distance and keep product in focus and stable. Will sub.
![Summer Walker - Heart Of A Woman [Official Lyric Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SFddctbZzw8/mqdefault.jpg)
You can find the Anker 747 Charger on Amazon with our Affiliate link here: amzn.to/3d9NMUI
I have this product.
It’s 100w max when using 1 USB C port, but 150w max when using more than 1 port.
If it interests you, Anker does offer a charger that does look much like this one, but only has 1 USB C port and is 140w max.
I am still pleased with this product.
2:05 start of review
its a pity that anker have not yet produced the UK-PLUG version of this great charger
There is an Anker battery bank coming out that has 140 watts out with lcd screen with watt usage on there waiting for the one for your review
I just checked the Anker website and that battery bank is now available.
@@acsbsu714 I might be getting that
Yeah that's one monster power bank for sure.
I'm encountering slow charger attached message for my Lenovo laptop 65W even if that''s the only thing plugged in. Is this normal? Didn't use to happen with my Anker 735
Note that the Anker 747 has issues charging many Lenovo laptops such as Lenovo Yoga 9i and Slim Pro. I have 6 chargers which are able to charge at 100 watts or more but the Anker 747 is only able to charge up to 13 watts on my Lenovo 9i whereas the rest can charge up to 90+ watts. Apparently there are some compatibility issues between Anker and some Lenovo laptops. These incompatibility issues are also mentioned in reddit by Anker users
This is duo to charger types. I owned 2 100w chargers. One from baseus and one from Anker. The baseus one charged my rog ally (65w max) just fine, but the Anker only did 12v 20w. I believe This is just a charger profile issue as my Anker was pps and the baseus was not
solid review! helpful stuff... subbed
Thanks for the info.
How do I know how much charge is left? I don’t see any lights on it.
Are you serious?
Didn't know they hit the >100W mark.
can I use it to charge a Dell laptop that requires 130W? When plugged in, it says "slow charger attached"
That's probably because your Dell laptop doesn't support the same protocol that this charger has, the laptop doesn't call the correct protocol to signal the charger that it needs 130W
I guess that maybe the dell only calls the protocol that transfer 20 - 65w from the charger
@@vintagewander It's also max 100W from a single port.
Can I charge 2 MacBooks at the same time?
Yes
Regarding Anker's flagship charger "747" is packed with superior technologies that set it apart from the competition such as having GaN3 instead of GaN2 and power IQ4.0 instead of power IQ3.0 All this explains why the Anker is smaller and lighter than other chargers yet have more ports(4) and power(150w) than the competition such as Apple. And if you own both the anker 747 charger and the ugreen nexode 200w charger like I do, you'll notice that the anker is exactly half the size and weight compared to the ugreen, which means if you use 2 anker's together you'll get 300w of power and have 8 ports vs ugreen having 200w and 6 ports. So with that said, it's obvious that anker's superior technology makes it more space efficient than the ugreen.
Good tech content, but would suggest not hand holding camera or divice, too much waving about. Swap the busy brick background for a plain neutral 18% gray. The busy bricks kept drawing attention away from the presentation. Suggest tripod shot to table to fix camera distance and keep product in focus and stable. Will sub.
Dope channel
I bet you have a beautiful head of hair.
Excellent video.
?!