an absolute masterclass in orchestration. it really surprised me when i'd found out it wasn't ravel himself who had orchestrated the final movement! bravo to Kocsis!
When I was 18 years old, I studied this on the piano. I´d never heard the orchestration of the whole work. Hear it now brings me the same fascination I felt back then
The two completed movements by Kocsis have always been a revelation. The fugue is like the cooing of sad pigeons on a rainy day while the toccata is like flying over the ocean. Wonderful, thank you.
Kocsis' orchestrations of the two missing movements are really amazing in my opinion. He does "cheat" though in the toccata by adding a lot of percussion instruments (and I think trombone) to the orchestra.
@@Cmaj7 Honestly though, it works well with the percussion though, and I think having some percussion solves a few problems, such as the snare drum ensuring that the 16th notes below the staff are heard clearly
I really like the orchestration for the fugue but the toccatta seems a bit too.. big? Like its a fantastic orchestration but it sounds like its written on a grander scale and for a bigger orchestra than the rest which makes it sound a bit off in context of the full piece (to me at least). Still glad we got an orchestration for those two movements though, its a shame ravel didnt orchestrate them himself
Do you have the score sheet for Toccata? I would really like to see Kocsis' arrangement and distribution of instruments. I tried searching online but never found it.
It isn't the Ravel forgot to orchestrate the other two pieces or didn't have the time for it. He had of course his reasons. Kocsis orchestrations are technically well done and you can tell that he adapted many things from Ravel's orchestration of other works, but especially the Toccata is just over the top. The rich Daphnis style is just inappropriate for this piece.
I can hear an extra oboe and an alto flute added in the fugue. I agree that it would be better to stick to original orchestration as much as possible, but it's very beautiful nonetheless!
@@jessturner6886 i see what you mean, he indeed "cheated" by adding more instruments and in the end, le tombeau is meant to be a very classical and balanced piece with minimal means. nonetheless i still feel that it's an absolutely magical orchestration by Kocsis and i'd very much rather listen to an orchestral performance which included the two missing movements
![Ravel - Le Tombeau de Couperin, M. 68 [Seong-Jin Cho]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nmWOMfTOXUI/mqdefault.jpg)
![Ravel - Le Tombeau de Couperin, M. 68 [Seong-Jin Cho]](/img/tr.png)
an absolute masterclass in orchestration. it really surprised me when i'd found out it wasn't ravel himself who had orchestrated the final movement! bravo to Kocsis!
Ah fancy seeing you here!
The orchestration by Kocsis is not good enough to remind us of one by Ravel.
he orchestrated the fugue too!
Indeed.
It's even more surprising that Ravel didn't bother to orchestrate Toccata, a piece which practically begs to be orchestrated.
Kocsis is the man! What an amazing ear he had. Played the Strauss Burleske with him back in 1987 or 88 in a BBC Prom with the BBC SO. Happy days!!
👍
I am really grateful for Zoltán Kocsis to have completed the orchestration!
When I was 18 years old, I studied this on the piano. I´d never heard the orchestration of the whole work. Hear it now brings me the same fascination I felt back then
Wow, you played this when you were _18?_ It's very difficult, especially the concluding Toccata. Amazing!
You are very talented 🎉❤
TOTAL audio delight 🙂🙂🙂
Many thanks for many listens🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
God it feels good to be alive
The two completed movements by Kocsis have always been a revelation. The fugue is like the cooing of sad pigeons on a rainy day while the toccata is like flying over the ocean. Wonderful, thank you.
I misread this at first as ‘the cooking of sad pigeons …’ with which I would have disagreed.
So, based on what I’ve read, Fugue is basically just Oiseaux tristes
effective, no waste, the greatest orchestration
For some reason this piece feels like sitting in a cool, gently flowing stream.
Thanks a million for showing the score! It helps me tremendously to actually see and hear the music! CHEERS!
Never knew Kocsis completed the two missing movements. So good! And really close to what Ravel would have done himself. I love it!
Kocsis' orchestrations of the two missing movements are really amazing in my opinion. He does "cheat" though in the toccata by adding a lot of percussion instruments (and I think trombone) to the orchestra.
@@Cmaj7 Honestly though, it works well with the percussion though, and I think having some percussion solves a few problems, such as the snare drum ensuring that the 16th notes below the staff are heard clearly
@@james_subosits agreed! i think the percussion here has not only achieved great effect but also helped a lot of the rhythm to be clear and precise.
Can someone please share his orchestration of Toccata? I’m dying to see how he did it
@@Cmaj7 Yes! Similarly, I think he added an extra oboe to the Fugue (so now its 2 oboe 1 EH), which I think Ravel wouldn't have done.
This is one of those pieces that really uplifts my faith in humanity. Just the purest display of human creativity and passion.
My comfort ravel piece
Same here
Çan You explain what you mean by that ? Thanks
@@davidfavre8296he loves listening to this
comfortable
I haven't heard this version before, it really opens a new perspective on the piece!
His use of rhythm is epic
Don Freund arranged the Toccata for the original instrumentation and it’s available as a score video on RUclips!
Second time listening to this and it really reminds me of the music from the Cat Returns lol
idk tho it might just be me
Nice! I really like this orchestration.
I really like the orchestration for the fugue but the toccatta seems a bit too.. big? Like its a fantastic orchestration but it sounds like its written on a grander scale and for a bigger orchestra than the rest which makes it sound a bit off in context of the full piece (to me at least). Still glad we got an orchestration for those two movements though, its a shame ravel didnt orchestrate them himself
What Internet had missed all this time !
when it went DUN dundun DUN dundundundundun, I really felt that.
You mean in Forlane?
@@duryi6399 rigaudon
Wonderful.
Ravel-french genius :3
That’s the good shit right there
This is so good, but I love the piano version more tbh.
In some movements, the piano is better, but when Ravel orchestrated it, i preffer the orchestral version
Under appreciated piece
23:47 How does he achieve that sound?!
You use the power of the impressionist.
Trombone glissando
@@eduardomanrique400 Thanks, i was thinking it was a gliss plus flutter. Maybe some horn trills as well
Yeah, I was thinking it was trombone too, but I was a bit doubtful that Kocsis would add in trombones as well.
Horns, ff, rip, cuivré (like 24:17)
I want to believe Ravel would have approved of what Kocsis did.
Do you have the score sheet for Toccata? I would really like to see Kocsis' arrangement and distribution of instruments. I tried searching online but never found it.
Where are the full scores of Kocsis’ two orchestrations? Can someone tell me?
I'm glad there's an orchestration of the toccata... but... that glockenspiel was very uncalled for
Dio mio, ma che bella musica.
20:10
It isn't the Ravel forgot to orchestrate the other two pieces or didn't have the time for it. He had of course his reasons.
Kocsis orchestrations are technically well done and you can tell that he adapted many things from Ravel's orchestration of other works, but especially the Toccata is just over the top. The rich Daphnis style is just inappropriate for this piece.
I can hear an extra oboe and an alto flute added in the fugue. I agree that it would be better to stick to original orchestration as much as possible, but it's very beautiful nonetheless!
0:00
2:05
7:00
11:00
14:30
13:34
I would love to buy the Zoltan Kocsis sheet music. Does anyone know where I can get it? Thanks in advance
what does he use for 22:45? in movies they do the same for the wind
It's a wind machine.
Anyway to find the orchestrated score for these two movements?
Unfortunately, I can't find any indication that the orchestrations were published.
Anyway of sourcing Kocsis' orchestration? The opening is so light and playful, I love it!
オケ版にフーガとトッカータが入ってる。面白い。
Im here for the 69:th comment
I don't want to be that guy but... 5:20 😬
what happens there?
@@somebody9033 Horn plays an F sharp instead of an F natural.
@@mysterium364 Great observation. I missed it completely. Thanks.
…but you are that guy
… I am :(
It reminds me Zelda Ocharina of time sometimes... Maybe im wrong
ポリーニは持ってるね。なんかそんな気がした。
青汁で思い出した、昔明日葉を飲んでたよ。まずくてやめたけど結構飲んだよ！これから寒くなるからよもぎも飲むと良いよ。
この曲ピアノが原曲じゃないの？ピアノしか知らなかったんよ。
よもぎの話。飲用と浴用とあるから気を付けて買わないと浴用を飲んだら危ないよ！
僕お金なかったから浴用の安いよもぎをチビチビ飲んでた、（笑）
アメリカがしつこいから忘れないでね！しつこいの！ならいいんだよ！
lyric
You had me until the wind machine at 22:45
that's quite literally one of my favourite parts and genius imo
@@skylarlimex I admit, the Daphnis and Chloe reference is a nice little Easter Egg, but the last movement is really just a little too over-the-top.
@@jessturner6886 i see what you mean, he indeed "cheated" by adding more instruments and in the end, le tombeau is meant to be a very classical and balanced piece with minimal means. nonetheless i still feel that it's an absolutely magical orchestration by Kocsis and i'd very much rather listen to an orchestral performance which included the two missing movements
Why does everyojne play this so damn fast? It sounds so much better with a moderate pace.
No
@@GUILLOMñ
@@classicore22 hi
Which one?
7:44
インテリア王国の広島ってやっちゃってね！
ってか、日本人じゃないよね？今更？
美樹に質素しろって言われたけど、僕自分で贅沢品買ってないよ。栄養だけはお金出してるけど。
じゃんじゃん行こう！
隣の男もね！一度で２度うまい！
今日はメチャ獣臭したけど、大丈夫？心配だなあ。
this piece is just an oboe concerto
Yes it is >:)
Just?
アメリカとイギリスがアピるのウザいからやっちゃって！（笑）爆笑！
お腹ぐぢゅぐぢゅしてる。ざまーみろって馬の骨達美味しく料理しよう！（笑）
お空に行きたかった奴ら皆極悪地獄絵図でね！
入浴はやっぱかなりキツい！よっぽど邪気凄い感じ？でも入浴頑張るよ！
敷きシーツがなかなか乾かない！綿１００％は手強い！困るよ！
僕の会社はお金に替えといてって前にいったはず。ん？
やっちゃえ！
アピるの最低！なぜかはわかる人ならわかるね？
石澤と古田が吐いた内容、NHK皆に教えれば？
14:50
24:04