When I saw this in public, the horns were 'sent away' after the second movement as a 'punishment' for playing wrong notes, and only came back in the last movement. That's ideally why the horns are not included in the third movement
When we did this, we (the horn players) were dismissed after the "mistake" so we went to the bar and were brought back with half-empty glasses for the finale. But why didn't Mozart just ask for the wrong crook? The wrong notes he writes would have to be hand stopped and so would not be a good simulation. Another fairly common "wrong crook" joke is to play the horn solo at the start of Weber's overture to Oberon a semitone sharp - in rehearsal of course - and wait for the strings to enter. It's amazing how many string players and conductors don't have perfect pitch!
@@cpestrauss8740 do you have that horn solo prank on video somewhere? sounds hilarious! On a serious note, you don't need perfect pitch to be a good musician in my opinion
Mozart composed this piece right after the death of his compulsively demanding father. It was as he was paying "tribute" to all of what his father taught him NOT to do. It was as young Mozart was feeling freedom for the first time of his life.
modern composers have nothing new so they write shit. When I said modern composers, I meant to say modern, "classical" genre orchestral concert music. I should have used another word other than "shit" Unpleasant and artificial dissonances is a better description. Art reflects the socio/economic/political times we live in.
Me: “Hahah, that’s some pretty bad counterpoint” Also me: *cries while looking at my own compositions realizing that they would literally be considered a joke written by Mozart*
He’s mocking the stylistic cliches of the music scene he was a part of, so if you (like most people in 2019) are not deeply inundated in the 18th-century European classical music world then not only is the mockery lost, so is the knowledge that all the intentional cliches are, y’know, cliche. It’d be like watching a parody of Hollywood action movies without ever having seen one and thinking “Whoa, that looks cool!”
I think Mozart partly wanted to play around with unconvential composing methods. If he would have released some parts of this piece under another title, he would have been called a bad composer. In the early classic era many things were just considered wrong in music.
Which proves the "rules" don't mean anything. Things the narrator called "clunky" and "ridiculous" were actually pleasing. Which, in music, means they really aren't. A good example is a composer intentionally building tension only to fumble the resolution, which frustrates the listener. But if done well, it can actually lead to a deeper level of thematic tension to be resolved.
As you say many of these phrases are pleasing to us, but how pleasing would they have been to his audience? My sense is that these jokes would have been quite a bit more obvious and humorous to the educated among his audience than they are to us because we're much more familiar with music that violates the rules of the time.
@@JBanchiere If you play an isolated major chord, it's also pleasing. Doesn't mean it's good music. "'Rules don't mean anything' doesn't mean anything." If some people don't get the jokes and still say it sounds great, it's just maybe because they aren't that well-versed in music. It's like showing me a poor baseball or American football play. As a non-American, I just wouldn't notice it.
@@btonasse If music is pleasing, and you're saying it's not "good" for intellectual reasons, I think we have a fundamental disagreement as to the nature of music.
You need to remember that we don't have the auditory quality of listeners of it's time: in an era or Rock and Pop, besides the audit pollution of our modern industrialized world, our ears are probably damaged beyond repair, and our taste broken beyond recognition, to appreciate what a listener of it's time would have considered hilariously bad. In basic terms, in the world of Eminen and Taylor Swift, even this song sounds like a masterpiece.
It was interesting to hear the Haydn joke of getting the violinists to retune their instruments mid-piece then continue on as if nothing had happened. That's something you could expect to see in a modern day satire!
Uh ... Mozart wasn't British ...? He was Austrian ...? And Mozart died 110 years before the monocle was really even introduced in England ...? God help us.
Musician: What do you think of Mozart's "Ein Musikalischer Spaß"? Me trying to impress: Oh, it's a marvelous piece. Beautiful composition. Sublime! If there was a perfect composition, that would be the one. Musician: It's a joke composition.
No. It is when your(my) IQ is so low that it takes 22 minutes to get the joke. I am laughing now, but to be honest I have to look at the scripts, otherwise I just hear that something is off, and since it is Mozart, I think that must be a rusty orchestra, some things are even written like that. Even the title does not say it all since a joke is short, this is a loooooong piece for a witz, if you know what I mean.
@@segmentsAndCurves Which part? First I said that my (musical) IQ was too low to understand what the joke is about on just hearing it. Next, I explain how it looked to me clumsy as if it was not executed right, there was nothing funny. Next, I say after I watched the video I realized that all that clumsiness is intentional and the point is to look at the score actually. First part, when I say that my (musical) IQ is too low, is a joke on me. Not that it is not true, I am always saying that I have stupid ears.
To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Ein Musikalischer Spaß. The humour is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the jokes will go over a typical listener's head. There's also Mozart's nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation- his personal philosophy draws heavily from Narodnaya Volya literature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realise that they're not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Mozart truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in Mozart's existential catchphrase "Leck mich im Arsch," which itself is a cryptic reference to Turgenev's Russian epic Fathers and Sons. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Mozart's genius wit unfolds itself on their television screens. What fools.. how I pity them. 😂 And yes, by the way, i DO have a Mozart tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- and even then they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand. Nothin personnel kid 😎
I feel kinda horrible because I thought I was a musician, but the only thing I thought really sounded bad was the horn crook joke but even then I thought it sorta worked in a strange way ; w ; am I an idiot? help
I think for the most part it's only really audible if you actually have had training and enough experience in counterpoint. The "rules" are intended to ensure maximum independence of the voices and a treatment of dissonance which is pleasant to the ear. This does not mean however that we naturally hear these "mistakes" because the system is logical but still man-made, jazz for example is full of parallels and dissonance treatment which Bach would probably cringe at but sounds absolutely fine to any jazz musician. You need to know what's supposed to happen before you can hear it going "wrong". If you watch the world cup final (soccer) and see an attacker lingering around beyond the opponent's defensive line, it would only be obviously strange to you if you know the rules of the game and have watched many matches before.
@Sean Brown, indeed. After playing Sostakovich's Prelude 19 Op. 34 (ruclips.net/video/m3zLY0PioZs/видео.html ) myself, the only weird thing I would have noticed here without the narration would've been the obviously dissonant ending. And then there are all the pieces that break the rules without even trying to be funny.
The parts that Mozart seemed to have intended as rude outbursts actually function to resolve other elements of the composition. The man did not allow himself to compose anything truly ugly.
Mozart also subtitled the work 'The Village Musicians', and meant for it to be played clumsily as well. So it's a satire on mediocre composers and unprofessional musicians as well. If the conducting is slick and well-performed, it misses the point entirely. The only performance I have ever heard that really worked was years ago, when the Atlanta Chamber Players played it like complete amateurs, and the audience was in stitches; all the jokes came through. If anyone knows of a clumsily performed recording, please pass it on.
Spot on: there's a certainly cross purpose to having professional musicians play this so well... actually reminds me of the Cage paradox - having done everything to remove "intentionality" from the compositional process, his performers re-aestheticize the work by virtue of their long experience of making their instruments sound beautiful & distinctive
@@kapitankapital6580 Maybe this speaks to the truth of Beecham's assertion that the British don't really understand music, they just like the sound it makes.
@@FastusMusic :: Yes, cross purpose, but still, it does not spoil my day that the recording is so well done, enthusiastic and energetic and - what counts most for me - so well played in tune. Most of the jokes came through to me the first time. What ***really*** bothers me is that some of the truely bad passages can be played in a way so that you do not hear the clashes, stupid doublings and other gags; this means that also in "good" Mozart (and others) you will have bad passages which can be "retouched" by the players. (We knew that, but still ...)
@@FastusMusic I am wondering about that. Yes, it is somewhat cross-purpose. On the other hand, this piece manages to be both terrible and beautiful at the same time, which is high art too. Just like in the midsummer nights dream, the play at the end is dreadfully funny, but the end of the play should be really touching.
@@uzefulvideos3440 Yeah I guess since they did have strict rules for writing music, any deviation was noticeable. I guess it would be like putting a rapp beat on a country song.
My impression is that in between all the musical 'jokes' there's still some Mozart genius in there. Like Charlie Chaplin doing slapstick - it looks like he's off balance and about to fall on his face, but really he had to have the balance of a ballet dancer to pull it off without actually injuring himself. Peter Schickele, Spike Jones, move over!
As a hornplayer who has played the valveless horns similar to those in use during Mozart's time, I think your explanation of the silly horn duet in the trio of the minuet is wrong. The players wouldn't have changed crooks; there wasn't enough time. Players of the time had to adjust the position of their hands in the bell to get notes outside the harmonic series, and to true up the pitch of the notes in the harmonic series that are out of tune. What is happening is that the players are using the wrong hand positions, closing up the bell for notes that are supposed to be open. The A flat, E flat, C sharp, and G sharp would have been played with the hand fully closed, resulting not only in the wrong notes you hear, but also in an abrupt and silly change in tone quality. In the last movement, the trill on the note low G by the second horn would have been impossible: the next overtone available on the natural horn would be middle C, making a trill across a perfect fourth. Nasty! I wonder if the piece has been recorded on authentic instruments. Nice video.
To make this piece truly come out, I think they would have to play it with original horns. Modern horns can play this too good, which make it lose a lot of the intended effect.
> the trill on the note low G by the second horn would have been impossible Yes, I was thinking the same. There's no way to do that as a lip trill, and thus no way to play it as written on the natural horn. I have to wonder what Mozart was expecting for that passage.
Yes this was recorded with modern horns unfortunately.. You can hear it at 19:47 when the second horn makes a normal trill which is impossible in a natural horn. Also the A flat and F sharp in the first passage would have just been played open because of the natural "out of tune" of A and F (11th and 13th harmonic)
@@Tehom1 If that trill is impossible to play on the natural horn, this may have simply been Mozart`s joke on his 2nd horn player maybe with the expectation he would just leave out the passage altogether--sort of like what I used to hear every so often, "Take it up two octaves and leave it out.",
The fact that even a complete non-musician like myself can catch much of the humour in this work, over 230 years after it was written, is a testament to the brilliance of Mozart.
It's interesting how a lot of these examples aren't actually bad from a musical perspective; they're simply roasting musical conventions of the day that were, in large measure, artificially constructed. In other words, this piece is very listenable. Mozart's jesting disdain for "lowbrow" compositional choices, techniques, and stereotypes belie the fact that the music usually still works. When taken literally, this "joke" piece's deliberate mockery creates some interesting subject matter for analysis. If Mozart belies expectations by returning to a key after setting up a modulation, then it doesn't really matter if his intention was humor: That's still an interesting artistic choice. Stuff like that is commonplace in modern music. Overconfident melodies, deliberately wrong tuning, irregular theme lengths...there's a lot of musical potential here! Great video laying out the piece from Mozart's point of view.
Holy hell, the terrible pseudo-intellectualism reeking out of your comment. Form isn't artifical, he wasn't making fun of some artificial conventions, he is making fun of bad composers, who could not compose with coherent form, that's it, it isn't some experiment, it doesn't have any secret message, it's just a bad composition, made for the sake of entertainment. People like you are the reason modern art is criticised, and ignored by everyone except the very members of your cult.
me too, but I never knew that the last measures were in 5 different tonalities... I would have a major problem to enter those notes as written in my MuseScore program...
18:43 - The trill in the 2nd horn isn’t as much comedic as it is just cruel. On a natural horn, that would trill a perfect 4th (verses a 2nd) because of the harmonic series. The trill in the recording sounds clean because it’s played on a modern (aka, valve/rotor) horn. It would sound ridiculous on a natural horn. So, to the listener, amusing; to the 2nd horn player, just plain rude on Mozart’s part!
@@englandshope689 Do you think harmony is the only element in music? Even if it is, Haydn and Mozart are two of the most harmonically interesting composers of any era. I'm not sure which pieces you have heard.
I think that's sort of the point. It's good enough and something that's musically plausible, but at the same time pokes fun at the "kitchen sink" style of amateurish composers.
Ehhhhh while the notes were fine with me, I found listening to the whole thing exhausting - there isn't a "melody" that lasts more than like two measures, modulations going nowhere and ending abruptly, repetitions that are both unnecessary and too length, a stillborn fugue section. And the poor horn!
@@dandy-lions5788 The low horn trill (2 octaves below the first horn) is essentially impossible on a natural horn. The joke was on the horn player, not the listener.
ah, there is a big point there! we are so used to "broken rules" that we find the piece rather normal. we are musical barbarians compared to mozart's audience!
@@christianlingurar7085 Not at all. Our music is far more advanced than Mozart's. There's nothing wrong with enjoying Mozart and not enjoying contemporary Avant Garde works, but you can hardly call Messiaen for example a barbarian compared to Mozart.
It's Mozart...even in his casual, backhanded work there is undeniable beauty. He should have done a version where he takes this and turns it into his real work. That would have been a treat.
Well, maybe it had some beauty to Mozart's ears too... A musical joke or fun doesn't necessarily needs to be bad, don't you think ? Humor has a lot to do with logic and its slight bending. Maybe the whole joke is about the fact that some beautiful or enjoyable music came from some broken composition rules ? I don't know.
@@AtomicDuckQuark exactly that is the reason why i even wrote the comment. I love this video, but it has at some parts that "teacher" feeling when passages sound, or rather should sound to my ear, "ridiculous" or "stupid", and I didn't even hear any of that. I think it's interesting to see the strict rules of that time though, and like to learn about it. But the general flavor of the video was that it is a pure joke and not a piece with some really nice ideas.
@@PianoScoreVids Actually, I partly agree with you - that's why I included all the Haydn examples that are meant to be funny but not necessarily "bad."
@@Richard.Atkinson cool, thanks for your answer, i enjoy your professional work. I also have a channel, but I play obscure piano music, not analyse it as you do. RUclips is just great because everybody can express their interests and make videos about music. So again, thank you. This piece was my task for high school graduation by the way. It was an actual funny exam to write an analysis :)
"Counterpoint is the art of weaving together independent melodies in order to produce a beautiful, harmonious whole. Each part is tuneful and interesting in itself, and when parts are combined with each other, we hear the result as harmony. The music then, has both a horizontal and a vertical aspect."
I’ve just finished up my late night studying, and providence is clearly rewarding my diligence with a real treat; a new Atkinson video! Thank you for this late night delight!
I rembered when I first listened to this, I thought “wheres the joke? This sounds pretty normal to me.” Then came the horn passage at 5:24 and I just burst out laughing!
@MrAdamNTProtester The modulation in the Rondo amazed me more than made me laugh, as I felt that it sounded ahead of it’s time. That’s almost a Jazz modulation!
The first movement isn't really that obvious about its funniness - it just sounds awkward (the theme is really unimaginative and has this repetitive rhythm that gets kind of annoying when it's repeated throughout the movement), and it kind of makes you think "WTF was this composer thinking". To me, the most awkward part is the repeat after the ending. I know people don't always play repeats, but the repeat in the end really fits this piece, because it makes it sound even more awkward. "Oh, the piece ended here... Nope, it continues - MAKE IT STOP!"
Understanding it really doesnt make it much funnier. You have to be a very specific type of music nerd to get more than two or three chuckles out of this, as you really have to know a lot about what music in mozarts time was like. Nowadays there is so much shitty music that this sounds more like some attempt to add jazzy elements to classical composing methods, back when it was written it would have sounded much more weird to our ears and it wouldnt necessarily have to be understood to be funny.
@@Zirc0nium69 I thought that too: my ears were not too bothered by some of the highlighted jokes and I wondered how much of that is influenced by the music that surrounds us today. Knowing context makes a difference in how I understand what was happening. Btw, @Richard Atkinson, I really appreciate your analysis - very educational and eye-opening for me. :)
When Mozart tries to sound bad, it sounds way better than I could sound if I tried to sound good. Assuming I ever learned to do all this, dots on a page stuff.
"Fun" is indeed the correct translation. There is no particular "joke" as such, it's just Mozart taking the piss. Sort of like a Spike Jones of his day. The purpose of music is to entertain, and if it serves that purpose, then it's not a bad composition. And indeed, it's not meant to be bad: the piece utilises "bad" elements to create fun, and if it succeeded, then the composition was actually a good one.
Krzysztof Q I had the same initial reaction to the firebird. I think I was able to enjoy the Rite of Spring simply due to its cultural prevalence; I had been exposed to it many times through Fantasia and Cosmos as a kid. Stravinsky’s music takes some time to settle in, but once you get it, it is amazing.
@@Not_what_it_used_to_be I've been meaning to make videos about both Firebird and The Rite, so stay tuned for them! I hope Krzysztof will also watch them - maybe I'll change his mind!
the part where there is a sequence of three sol (which do is the outcome of the sound) is a little part of the melody in the wet-nurses' dance in Petrushka
Thank you for pointing out all the gags. I missed some of these, and probably a bunch of others you didn't get to. I will review the score and a recording carefully. THANK YOU!!!
This isn't as bad as I thought it'd be. I was expecting something more chaotic and atonal. Some of the ideas are actually interesting, like the head-fake modulations. The only part that's violent to the ears is the finale chords. Even that wobbly horn part wasn't too bad; it's jazzy and Stravinsky-esque.
it's cause some of these things doesn't sound so strange to us like it would sound for the ears of the time. We are used to modern music and dissonant chords. Beyond that, this recording is too clean and correctly played, and they are playing modern instruments. So, many of jokes are kind of lost.
Mozart wouldn’t call it “jazzy and Stravinsky-esque” because in his day there was no such thing as jazz, and Stravinsky wasn’t born yet, let alone writing music. I think that’s the point: Music is a much different thing now (or should I say, so many different things) than it was in the Classical era.
it doesn't sound bad because you are used to pretending that amateur compositions that don't follow any rationale outside of having a decent melody while all voice leading is random and the form being nonexistent are actually good.
The deadpan narration using so many derogatory terms clashes hilariously with the lighthearted piece. The commentary along with the visual indication of recurring and similar parts is very informative though! It's one of the rare cases when explaining the joke makes it actually thrive.
I wonder how much Mozart enjoyed composing this piece. Not just as a parody either. I like to think it was refreshing for him to not have to follow all the rules for once and to be allowed to experiment musically with a free pass to do so without tarnishing his reputation as a composer, especially since it’s a humorous piece to begin with. It must have been fun Some of it, amongst the flagrant rule breaking, seem like an earnest attempt at making music. In that way, it may have been something of a guilty pleasure. And likely a very cathartic one at that I wonder if he wrote more “sacrilegious boi” music that he kept secret, or perhaps even published under a pseudonym
Unfortunately you are correct... in 1776 we had the Declaration, in 1788-9 we had the Federalist papers... today we have a rhyming dictionary & a drum machine & dueling scatologualists [ NEW WORD- Hooray!] ... oh how the mighty have fallen
The modulation in that quintet dedicated to Haydn is beyond fantastic. I had no Idea such musical expressions were possible- it's almost like modulating to the dominant key twice!
Mr. A., I am so incredibly grateful to you. I have known this famous piece most of my adult life, but had no idea so much was hidden from me, through my inadequate musical knowledge. You are like a code-breaker who shows how a difficult code is broken, though inexperienced eyes (or ears) would not see it as a code in the first place. I will never hear this piece in the same way again.... how clever of Mozart to encode these jokes so deftly, where only expert eyes could see them. Thank you very much
Mozart: writes a piece that is meant to be be a literal joke; still sounds good Modern composers: try their hardest; sound even worse than Mozart’s joke
Mozart had to follow the strictest rules. To deviate just a little was comical and to do more than that was not even considered music at all. Of course it still sounds good. Meanwhile modern classical music is hell bent on breaking every and all rules, while modern pop is simplified for the masses.
I like classical music and listen a lot to it, and, yes, I can definitely hear that this is a joking composition, but I have to admit that the joking nature of certain parts of it escapes me. Richard Atkinson obviously has a much deeper insight into the intricacies of music than I have. I have sometimes had the urge to compose music in the classical style, but now I feel afraid that whatever I produce would be laughed at.
Don't be scared of gaining experience in composing music! I remember in sixth grade I arranged pachelbels Canon in D and I thought I was really good. Looking back it was complete garbage and I ruined the piece, but because I wasn't scared of being bad I kept improving my composing skills and now I'm writing a marching show for my senior year of high school which we will march later this year.
Yes it is such a TRUTH: because of Mozart many would be Scalaeri's (or however you spell that dude's name) have folded up & slinked away... NEVER to be heard from again..... Until it's time for another commercial Jingle $$$
ive lost count of how many times ive watched this video...this and your badass nielsen moments video are probably two of the videos i rewatch the most on this site!
Thank you for the great presentation. It's wonderful to have the spoken exposition and then to hear all the sections in performance with the highlighted score.
Luckily, Mozart did not always write like this! Although, it is humbling to know that his "jokes" were far better than I can ever do! That string tuning was hilarious! Also, is it just me or does 5:23 sound somewhat similar to one of the Harry Potter themes?
seems as if harry potter music is a little inspired by some of the odd quirky works such as this because it embodies the whimsy of the movies, but I think what you're specifically thinking is something along the lines of this scene ruclips.net/video/DyRS04EVlvQ/видео.html
Thank you Mr. Atkinson. I know this piece and its purpose, but the most funny thing about it is that the work as a whole is quite pleasant to listen to, a real Mozart.
Interesting that the abrupt modulation examples and irregular syntactical phrasings or bar groupings, here a joke, become a virtue, an integrated part of the syntactical vocabulary of the Romantic era, notably Schubert and Brahms.
5:36 Hot take: First Violin is trying to show off by playing really high during the cadenza, but he can't find the notes because the stops are too close. So he gets whole tones. His expedition ends with the string breaking.
Thank you for making this! 25 years ago, I heard this on a classical music radio station, in the middle of the night, and the dissonant horn passage stuck with me. Then, for whatever reason, when I would search for "Mozart musical joke" I would get completely different results! Now I know the original German title! Thanks again!
I wonder if there was a specific composer who motivated Mozart to produce this hilarious, brilliant satire, almost Swiftian in its savagery. Great job, as usual. Your videos are one of the joys of the internet.
Maybe Jannequin? But I doubt Mozart could hear his works or study the score. Besides Musical Fun goes more far because it illustrates, imitates not only sounds of nature (birds) or battle, but unable composer and performers... Concerning polytonality, there are some older works where it occurs - I have one probably Rennaisance piece imitation of Jewish music, which is bitonal. And Biber's Battaglia has one polytonal movement...
Mozart: Hahahaha, the fine ladies at the ball will be be SO triggered by all these parallel fifths! Metalhead: Bruh, my music is made almost entirely of parallel fifths!
That's hilarious. Well that kinda raises the question of how the atonal music really are... All that intelligent work, but I often get the feeling that you could achieve the same goal, by randomly making up dissonances as a ground plan, and you could easily fool someone by making up a very "intelligent" description of the composition process, which is what everyone focuses on anyway, not how it sounds
I've heard people unironically try to argue that the whole tone scale in the third movement and the chords in the final movement are "Mozart trying to break new tonal ground".
@@steffen5121 There's a lot what contemporary composer can still learn from Mozart. Not much from his using the scales, harmony, rhythm - but compositional thinking, working with information, working with motifs, working with form, relation between contents and form, working with consonance an dissonance, music psychology...
Lip trills are also needed for modern horns with valves. Due to the way the harmonic series works on a horn, you often have two notes that are next to each other with no change of valves. With all of the multiple fingerings available for many of these notes, you CAN involves valves, but a skilled horn player will get a better result with a lip trill.
It's actually not quite so abrupt as the commentary in this video would have us believe. A flat major is, as stated, quite far out in left field to start with, and sounds it (at least a bit) even to our post-Wagner, post-Brahms ears. But then from A flat major it works its way around to that key's relative minor -- which is F minor -- a smooth move to a closely related key. The F major bit comes in immediately after a very clear cadence in F minor, so it's really just a slide from minor to major on the same tonic (F) -- a example of so-called "modal interchange" (which can go in either direction). It's a pretty standard move in classic and early romantic music, and, come to think of it, in later (and some earlier) music as well. And that, I think, is probably why the appearance of F major isn't disturbing to you. I hope I've explained this in a way that makes sense to you.
![[LFCO] Mozart: A Musical Joke K522](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wFPoRmsiFzc/mqdefault.jpg)
*Can't wait for his response video*
Cory Mck ackchyually Mozart is dead! Some people are sooo stupid smh
@@tamashellwig5275 Like soooo stupid
@@tamashellwig5275 too stupeed
@@tamashellwig5275 r/woooosh
Eduardo Squidwardo your the idiot 😂
Mozart was shitposting before internet was even... remotely posible
He even made scatological references in some of his letters
@@gelatinocyte6270 yeah so literally "shit"posting
These aren't _just_ shitposts, even.
Mozart was also referencing other musicians' pieces to poke fun at them... this is an ancient musical meme
@@gelatinocyte6270 Search "Leck mich in Arsch Mozart" on RUclips...
You are completeley stupid and mediocre.
When I saw this in public, the horns were 'sent away' after the second movement as a 'punishment' for playing wrong notes, and only came back in the last movement. That's ideally why the horns are not included in the third movement
and why the horns truly learned their lesson - they were the only ones who played the right notes in the last few bars of the last movement
I actually liked that horn part.
When we did this, we (the horn players) were dismissed after the "mistake" so we went to the bar and were brought back with half-empty glasses for the finale. But why didn't Mozart just ask for the wrong crook? The wrong notes he writes would have to be hand stopped and so would not be a good simulation. Another fairly common "wrong crook" joke is to play the horn solo at the start of Weber's overture to Oberon a semitone sharp - in rehearsal of course - and wait for the strings to enter. It's amazing how many string players and conductors don't have perfect pitch!
Filippo Carnovalini I appreciate the help for my Google Slides project on this song for school.
@@cpestrauss8740 do you have that horn solo prank on video somewhere? sounds hilarious!
On a serious note, you don't need perfect pitch to be a good musician in my opinion
Mozart: shitposts
Me: Why does it still sound good
Well to be fair it still sounds good but some parts of it are just fun
*Mozart makes fun of amateur composers*
*Amateur composers* - Why you bully me
Mozart composed this piece right after the death of his compulsively demanding father. It was as he was paying "tribute" to all of what his father taught him NOT to do. It was as young Mozart was feeling freedom for the first time of his life.
@@jorgeespinoza3938 Woah, cool.
I know. But it wouldn't have been such a great idea, and it wouldn't be Mozart, if it wasn't also fantastic music on some level.
The pizzicato note at the end of the cadenza is supposed to sound like a string breaking from "too high notes"
RDVMusic This would explain the E note missing in the next trill !
@@adrianomeis184 that makes sense!
@@musik350 and Adriano Meis: I wish I'd figured this out before making the video!
@@Richard.Atkinson Oh well, this is only a little detail. Your video was precise enough
Richard Atkinson Your videos are just awesome, no need to add anything
Mozart could never predict that modern musicians would compose even more awkward works in complete seriousness.
7 bar themes? Well thats so quint. Tonality, ahh that the devils work.
Or that if his musikalischer Spaß had been composed today, the composer would be chastised for writing easy listening.
modern composers have nothing new so they write shit. When I said modern composers, I meant to say modern, "classical" genre orchestral concert music.
I should have used another word other than "shit" Unpleasant and artificial dissonances is a better description.
Art reflects the socio/economic/political times we live in.
abz124816 gee thanks. Thats inspiring
@@abz124816 you just don't know where to find good modern music
Me: “Hahah, that’s some pretty bad counterpoint”
Also me: *cries while looking at my own compositions realizing that they would literally be considered a joke written by Mozart*
same 😢
Sweety, If your counterpoint sounds even remotely like a Mozart joke, you still are composing at genius level! Happy composing!
in fact mozart's joke counterpoint is way better than most of the counterpoints modern composers wrote, so congrats you are awesome
It's not so much that it's awful, but that this was 90% of the everyday mid / pot boiler music with all its clichés and mistakes.
200 year old ironic compositional shitposting, the absolute madlad
The God like madlad
I thoroughly enjoyed listening to the piece which now begs the question:
"Am I being mocked by Mozart for liking it?"
I don't think he's mocking the audience, he's mocking amateur musicians and inferior composers.
He’s mocking the stylistic cliches of the music scene he was a part of, so if you (like most people in 2019) are not deeply inundated in the 18th-century European classical music world then not only is the mockery lost, so is the knowledge that all the intentional cliches are, y’know, cliche. It’d be like watching a parody of Hollywood action movies without ever having seen one and thinking “Whoa, that looks cool!”
Raises the question =/= begs the question
I think Mozart partly wanted to play around with unconvential composing methods.
If he would have released some parts of this piece under another title, he would have been called a bad composer. In the early classic era many things were just considered wrong in music.
It was not Mozart mocking you... it was GOD!!!
Mozart actually wasn’t joking and just wanted to invent contemporary classical music
April Fools!
JOKES on you Bartok!
@@MrAdamNTProtester Since when was Bartók contemporary...?
Contemporary classical music is a joke.
Your unending vocabulary of adjectives amuses me
a plethora indeed :-)
@@JuergenNoll A smorgasbord of words?
A veritable cornucopia of superlatives :) However, the analysis is from the standpoint of a well educated and knowledgeable musician.
Cringey Libtard Welp, the name...checks...out?
wait
@Cringey Libtard genius
As wrong as it may be, it exudes Mozart’s creativity. I really love the ‘nevermind’ modulation and the sweats of the horn player.
The nevermind modulation is simply Brahms-75years early.
Those were 2 of my Favs as well... the horns are really funny
Ah yes, the best jokes are the ones that require 20 minutes of explanation :)
Ffirst comment ive seen not favorited by op, but best joke out there
Chris Ramey glad someone said it
with colored graphs and external references ! those are the funniest
@@MrTocoral /BKorP55Aqvg might amuse you. 🙂
Mozart didn't mean it to be a "joke". "Spaß" means "Fun". And Fun can be endless.
If you played this to me i would think it's a nice piece of music. no idea
fish and banana ....even the ending???
I may feel it’s a terrible orchestra but good music lol
Get your ears checked :)
Make sure you don't click the wrong track on the Spotify album
Lol get off your high horse, I’m sure without this video you would have no clue that the orchestration was intentionally bad.
Nobody can be a master of counterpoint like me.
Last movement of Mozart's 41th symphony left the chat.....
Oh, hi God.
@@nbnediit4364 bach loves rock and roll :)
Well, if I happened to be J.S. Bach instead of you, I'd have said "Not anyone can master counterpoint like me.". It sounds nicer.
Come to Brazil
So, in essence, Mozart purposefully made every mistake possible and still managed to deliver an enjoyable piece ? #madlad
Which proves the "rules" don't mean anything. Things the narrator called "clunky" and "ridiculous" were actually pleasing. Which, in music, means they really aren't.
A good example is a composer intentionally building tension only to fumble the resolution, which frustrates the listener. But if done well, it can actually lead to a deeper level of thematic tension to be resolved.
As you say many of these phrases are pleasing to us, but how pleasing would they have been to his audience? My sense is that these jokes would have been quite a bit more obvious and humorous to the educated among his audience than they are to us because we're much more familiar with music that violates the rules of the time.
@@JBanchiere If you play an isolated major chord, it's also pleasing. Doesn't mean it's good music. "'Rules don't mean anything' doesn't mean anything." If some people don't get the jokes and still say it sounds great, it's just maybe because they aren't that well-versed in music. It's like showing me a poor baseball or American football play. As a non-American, I just wouldn't notice it.
@@btonasse If music is pleasing, and you're saying it's not "good" for intellectual reasons, I think we have a fundamental disagreement as to the nature of music.
You need to remember that we don't have the auditory quality of listeners of it's time: in an era or Rock and Pop, besides the audit pollution of our modern industrialized world, our ears are probably damaged beyond repair, and our taste broken beyond recognition, to appreciate what a listener of it's time would have considered hilariously bad.
In basic terms, in the world of Eminen and Taylor Swift, even this song sounds like a masterpiece.
The opening of this piece is just the best. Even more than the technical clumsiness, I love how hilariously unimaginative it is!
Wow! Even the legend himself Tantacrul is here!
like your own music
Wow, never expect Tantacrul to be here!
@@Whatismusic123 facts
@@Whatismusic123 Like every single comment of yours
It was interesting to hear the Haydn joke of getting the violinists to retune their instruments mid-piece then continue on as if nothing had happened. That's something you could expect to see in a modern day satire!
His CLOCK symphony had a similar gag
@@MrAdamNTProtester
Haydn had a great sense of humor. Many of his symphonies feature gags like this.
Like something by PDQ Bach, aka Peter Schickele.
*Puts on monocle* hmm yes good sir hilarious i dare say
🍷🧐
Lmao
Uh ... Mozart wasn't British ...? He was Austrian ...? And Mozart died 110 years before the monocle was really even introduced in England ...? God help us.
😂🧐
@@user-pb1xd8pv2l please never comment on a joke again
Musician: What do you think of Mozart's "Ein Musikalischer Spaß"?
Me trying to impress: Oh, it's a marvelous piece. Beautiful composition. Sublime! If there was a perfect composition, that would be the one.
Musician: It's a joke composition.
Um I think it sounded quite good....
BookOwl same tho
Me: "It's very good! Of course, just now and then, occasionally it seems to have . . . how shall One say? . . .TOO MANY NOTES!" : )
While Bach tends to write to the rule book of music (I think he invented it), parts of this are listenable , if not easily playable.
@Andrei Georgescu It sounds good. It's unpredictable and different to most people like me. Stop being pretentious, the future is now old man
(In heaven)
Mozart: "that grosse fugue... that was a good one!!!!! I laughed for hours."
Beethoven: ".....I didn't hear you?"
Mozart: "Yes you did."
Haha.
When your jokes are so high IQ you need a 22 minute video to explain the joke
No. It is when your(my) IQ is so low that it takes 22 minutes to get the joke. I am laughing now, but to be honest I have to look at the scripts, otherwise I just hear that something is off, and since it is Mozart, I think that must be a rusty orchestra, some things are even written like that. Even the title does not say it all since a joke is short, this is a loooooong piece for a witz, if you know what I mean.
@@segmentsAndCurves Which part? First I said that my (musical) IQ was too low to understand what the joke is about on just hearing it. Next, I explain how it looked to me clumsy as if it was not executed right, there was nothing funny. Next, I say after I watched the video I realized that all that clumsiness is intentional and the point is to look at the score actually.
First part, when I say that my (musical) IQ is too low, is a joke on me. Not that it is not true, I am always saying that I have stupid ears.
@@alexpeter_pen Ah, I misread. Sorry if I seem obnoxious but I was making a joke.
To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Ein Musikalischer Spaß. The humour is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the jokes will go over a typical listener's head. There's also Mozart's nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation- his personal philosophy draws heavily from Narodnaya Volya literature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realise that they're not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Mozart truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in Mozart's existential catchphrase "Leck mich im Arsch," which itself is a cryptic reference to Turgenev's Russian epic Fathers and Sons. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Mozart's genius wit unfolds itself on their television screens. What fools.. how I pity them. 😂
And yes, by the way, i DO have a Mozart tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- and even then they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand. Nothin personnel kid 😎
Normal people: Sounds fine
Musicians: WHEEEEZEE
I feel kinda horrible because I thought I was a musician, but the only thing I thought really sounded bad was the horn crook joke but even then I thought it sorta worked in a strange way ; w ; am I an idiot? help
I'm a musician but idk to me it's quite nice I quite like the piece the thing that cracks me up is the horn part
I think for the most part it's only really audible if you actually have had training and enough experience in counterpoint. The "rules" are intended to ensure maximum independence of the voices and a treatment of dissonance which is pleasant to the ear. This does not mean however that we naturally hear these "mistakes" because the system is logical but still man-made, jazz for example is full of parallels and dissonance treatment which Bach would probably cringe at but sounds absolutely fine to any jazz musician. You need to know what's supposed to happen before you can hear it going "wrong". If you watch the world cup final (soccer) and see an attacker lingering around beyond the opponent's defensive line, it would only be obviously strange to you if you know the rules of the game and have watched many matches before.
Counterpoint is a specific art within music, it's perfectly possible to be a good musician who is unfamiliar with it :)
@@MrShoopdawoop97 I know that x3 that's what I meant, lol
But I like to study jazz, too
So I'll chalk it up to that so I can sleep easy, haha
Because we've gotten so used to dissonance and "rule-breaking" in music, many of Mozart's gags are sadly no longer terribly obvious.
2cool4school
@Sean Brown, indeed. After playing Sostakovich's Prelude 19 Op. 34 (ruclips.net/video/m3zLY0PioZs/видео.html ) myself, the only weird thing I would have noticed here without the narration would've been the obviously dissonant ending.
And then there are all the pieces that break the rules without even trying to be funny.
Well, many of the rules of the classical era were stylistic, and it was only correct to destroy their illegitimate mandatority
And some just sound really cool and modern. (Like the whole tone scale in the violin!) - At least for me as a jazz player! 😎🤘
@@frankybebop2913 pretty sure the whole tone scale wasn't played correctly but maybe that's the point
Me: Ha ha yes yes quite splendidly awful indeed
Also me: So which note exactly is "C"
If Mozart was around today every musician would be terrified to meet him
Music Majors: Look at this silly bass line, ironic trills, and unresolved chord progression
Me a total noob: It all sounds like good music to me
The parts that Mozart seemed to have intended as rude outbursts actually function to resolve other elements of the composition. The man did not allow himself to compose anything truly ugly.
Mozart also subtitled the work 'The Village Musicians', and meant for it to be played clumsily as well. So it's a satire on mediocre composers and unprofessional musicians as well. If the conducting is slick and well-performed, it misses the point entirely. The only performance I have ever heard that really worked was years ago, when the Atlanta Chamber Players played it like complete amateurs, and the audience was in stitches; all the jokes came through. If anyone knows of a clumsily performed recording, please pass it on.
Spot on: there's a certainly cross purpose to having professional musicians play this so well... actually reminds me of the Cage paradox - having done everything to remove "intentionality" from the compositional process, his performers re-aestheticize the work by virtue of their long experience of making their instruments sound beautiful & distinctive
Yes, I was thinking in this recording that a lot of it sounds fine apart from the really obvious ones.
@@kapitankapital6580 Maybe this speaks to the truth of Beecham's assertion that the British don't really understand music, they just like the sound it makes.
@@FastusMusic :: Yes, cross purpose, but still, it does not spoil my day that the recording is so well done, enthusiastic and energetic and - what counts most for me - so well played in tune. Most of the jokes came through to me the first time.
What ***really*** bothers me is that some of the truely bad passages can be played in a way so that you do not hear the clashes, stupid doublings and other gags; this means that also in "good" Mozart (and others) you will have bad passages which can be "retouched" by the players. (We knew that, but still ...)
@@FastusMusic I am wondering about that. Yes, it is somewhat cross-purpose. On the other hand, this piece manages to be both terrible and beautiful at the same time, which is high art too.
Just like in the midsummer nights dream, the play at the end is dreadfully funny, but the end of the play should be really touching.
It takes a genius like Mozart to turn a parody on bad writing into a grand multi-movement work. 🙄
I know - and even when Mozart wants to sound bad, and tries hard to do so, he can't help but actually sound quite good sometimes!
troll of the century
No, you just have to live in a time where music is supposed to follow absurdly strict rules.
@@uzefulvideos3440 Yeah I guess since they did have strict rules for writing music, any deviation was noticeable. I guess it would be like putting a rapp beat on a country song.
3:22 "Ridiculous viola passage"
Excuse me, but anything played by violas is ridiculous.
The twoset is strong in this one!
A beginner on trumpet or horn can sound pretty awful
I disagree, why is it ridiculous? Like it doesn't sounds bad or anything...
My impression is that in between all the musical 'jokes' there's still some Mozart genius in there. Like Charlie Chaplin doing slapstick - it looks like he's off balance and about to fall on his face, but really he had to have the balance of a ballet dancer to pull it off without actually injuring himself. Peter Schickele, Spike Jones, move over!
Of course! I hope it's obvious from this video that I love the piece...
That is an incredible analogy.
@@Garrett_Rowland Thanks. I'd forgotten about this, so thanks also for reminding me of it.
How Schoenberg made me immune to this....
As a hornplayer who has played the valveless horns similar to those in use during Mozart's time, I think your explanation of the silly horn duet in the trio of the minuet is wrong. The players wouldn't have changed crooks; there wasn't enough time. Players of the time had to adjust the position of their hands in the bell to get notes outside the harmonic series, and to true up the pitch of the notes in the harmonic series that are out of tune. What is happening is that the players are using the wrong hand positions, closing up the bell for notes that are supposed to be open. The A flat, E flat, C sharp, and G sharp would have been played with the hand fully closed, resulting not only in the wrong notes you hear, but also in an abrupt and silly change in tone quality. In the last movement, the trill on the note low G by the second horn would have been impossible: the next overtone available on the natural horn would be middle C, making a trill across a perfect fourth. Nasty! I wonder if the piece has been recorded on authentic instruments. Nice video.
To make this piece truly come out, I think they would have to play it with original horns.
Modern horns can play this too good, which make it lose a lot of the intended effect.
> the trill on the note low G by the second horn would have been impossible
Yes, I was thinking the same. There's no way to do that as a lip trill, and thus no way to play it as written on the natural horn. I have to wonder what Mozart was expecting for that passage.
Yeah, the crook story is no longer my favorite explanation for this passage (I never thought it made a lot of sense).
Yes this was recorded with modern horns unfortunately.. You can hear it at 19:47 when the second horn makes a normal trill which is impossible in a natural horn. Also the A flat and F sharp in the first passage would have just been played open because of the natural "out of tune" of A and F (11th and 13th harmonic)
@@Tehom1 If that trill is impossible to play on the natural horn, this may have simply been Mozart`s joke on his 2nd horn player maybe with the expectation he would just leave out the passage altogether--sort of like what I used to hear every so often, "Take it up two octaves and leave it out.",
Mozart's worst day is better than my absolute life best. Man had so much talent.
What horn crook do you want to use?
Motzart: YES
julianto triwijaya idk why, but this meme like comment made me lol way more than the horn part!
"I dunno, use whatever you want"
The fact that even a complete non-musician like myself can catch much of the humour in this work, over 230 years after it was written, is a testament to the brilliance of Mozart.
it's so crazy that a joke to mozart sounds like a flawless musical masterpiece to me...
flawless? i like some parts,
but those horn runs...
or that one violin cadenza,,,
yeah you're right. i was exaggerating a little. i know it wasn't actually flawless. just a funny thought.
yeah i know what you meant but those parts made me start crying of laughter
@@dbamp the double octave horn trill is what got me
It's interesting how a lot of these examples aren't actually bad from a musical perspective; they're simply roasting musical conventions of the day that were, in large measure, artificially constructed. In other words, this piece is very listenable. Mozart's jesting disdain for "lowbrow" compositional choices, techniques, and stereotypes belie the fact that the music usually still works. When taken literally, this "joke" piece's deliberate mockery creates some interesting subject matter for analysis. If Mozart belies expectations by returning to a key after setting up a modulation, then it doesn't really matter if his intention was humor: That's still an interesting artistic choice. Stuff like that is commonplace in modern music. Overconfident melodies, deliberately wrong tuning, irregular theme lengths...there's a lot of musical potential here! Great video laying out the piece from Mozart's point of view.
I'm actually wondering if he was kind of using this as an excuse to try out new things.
Holy hell, the terrible pseudo-intellectualism reeking out of your comment.
Form isn't artifical, he wasn't making fun of some artificial conventions, he is making fun of bad composers, who could not compose with coherent form, that's it, it isn't some experiment, it doesn't have any secret message, it's just a bad composition, made for the sake of entertainment.
People like you are the reason modern art is criticised, and ignored by everyone except the very members of your cult.
when you're that good at writing music, that you can intentionally write 'bad' music...
Carl Powell when you’re so awesome, the world loves.... even your bad music, 250 years after the fact!!
When you pay attention in music theory so you know all those crazy words he’s saying 😎😎😎
I always die of laughter when I hear those last chords 😂
me too, but I never knew that the last measures were in 5 different tonalities... I would have a major problem to enter those notes as written in my MuseScore program...
@@borisc6714 Just draw them in Paint and paste them in - it would fit the piece :P (If you draw it badly)
Just heard the chords for the first time today. Thought I might not laugh, since I considered myself forewarned by your comment--but I did! 😂
I''m in construction I get to hear that conclusion almost every other day.... grinders slip!
It's Schoenberg
18:43 - The trill in the 2nd horn isn’t as much comedic as it is just cruel. On a natural horn, that would trill a perfect 4th (verses a 2nd) because of the harmonic series. The trill in the recording sounds clean because it’s played on a modern (aka, valve/rotor) horn. It would sound ridiculous on a natural horn. So, to the listener, amusing; to the 2nd horn player, just plain rude on Mozart’s part!
0:42 I didn't come here to be attacked and exposed, Herr Mozart
I don't get it
because it's STILL better than what the average composer does lol
RandomAwesomeism Average? It’s better than masters...
5:24 is so harmonically refreshing after the endless clean tonics, supertonics, and dominants. Sounds more like Ravel.
yeah. I'm not a big Mozart fan tbh... It's like musical starch.
@@heresasoundcomment Please watch my many other Mozart videos and see if I can change your mind! Mozart is the opposite of simple carbs.
@@heresasoundcomment agreed..way better than all that usual predictable Mozart stuff...
@@Richard.Atkinson mozart is fairly basic in his harmonic/ chordal approach...
@@englandshope689 Do you think harmony is the only element in music? Even if it is, Haydn and Mozart are two of the most harmonically interesting composers of any era. I'm not sure which pieces you have heard.
Is it just me or does this piece actually sound not too bad, not musically, but just in general
I think that's sort of the point. It's good enough and something that's musically plausible, but at the same time pokes fun at the "kitchen sink" style of amateurish composers.
Ehhhhh while the notes were fine with me, I found listening to the whole thing exhausting - there isn't a "melody" that lasts more than like two measures, modulations going nowhere and ending abruptly, repetitions that are both unnecessary and too length, a stillborn fugue section. And the poor horn!
@@dandy-lions5788 The low horn trill (2 octaves below the first horn) is essentially impossible on a natural horn. The joke was on the horn player, not the listener.
ah, there is a big point there! we are so used to "broken rules" that we find the piece rather normal. we are musical barbarians compared to mozart's audience!
@@christianlingurar7085 Not at all. Our music is far more advanced than Mozart's. There's nothing wrong with enjoying Mozart and not enjoying contemporary Avant Garde works, but you can hardly call Messiaen for example a barbarian compared to Mozart.
It saddens me to realize how many mistakes like these i made in my early compositions.
Don't be discouraged :)
Maybe Mozart did, too! When he was like, 3?
I know the feeling... SMH.
I was thinking the same!
We would have been laughed at if we composed back then
I still make them all the time. But your ear usually lets you know that it doesn't sound good.
@@haleypatillo Lol!
Oh I'm probably too stupid but this work has some really beautiful passages in my opinion.
It's Mozart...even in his casual, backhanded work there is undeniable beauty.
He should have done a version where he takes this and turns it into his real work. That would have been a treat.
Well, maybe it had some beauty to Mozart's ears too... A musical joke or fun doesn't necessarily needs to be bad, don't you think ? Humor has a lot to do with logic and its slight bending. Maybe the whole joke is about the fact that some beautiful or enjoyable music came from some broken composition rules ? I don't know.
@@AtomicDuckQuark exactly that is the reason why i even wrote the comment. I love this video, but it has at some parts that "teacher" feeling when passages sound, or rather should sound to my ear, "ridiculous" or "stupid", and I didn't even hear any of that. I think it's interesting to see the strict rules of that time though, and like to learn about it. But the general flavor of the video was that it is a pure joke and not a piece with some really nice ideas.
@@PianoScoreVids Actually, I partly agree with you - that's why I included all the Haydn examples that are meant to be funny but not necessarily "bad."
@@Richard.Atkinson cool, thanks for your answer, i enjoy your professional work. I also have a channel, but I play obscure piano music, not analyse it as you do. RUclips is just great because everybody can express their interests and make videos about music. So again, thank you. This piece was my task for high school graduation by the way. It was an actual funny exam to write an analysis :)
"Counterpoint is the art of weaving together independent melodies in order to produce a beautiful, harmonious whole. Each part is tuneful and interesting in itself, and when parts are combined with each other, we hear the result as harmony. The music then, has both a horizontal and a vertical aspect."
I’ve just finished up my late night studying, and providence is clearly rewarding my diligence with a real treat; a new Atkinson video! Thank you for this late night delight!
Ah the great Paul Morphy, been to the opera lately?
Noah It’s always refreshing seeing the overlap between the communities. Makes me proud to be a part of both of them, you know?
Nicolas Andrews I regret to say there is a noted lack of opera houses 6 feet underground, good WiFi here though
Music: Am I a joke to you?
Mozart: *Yes.*
lmfaoooooo underrated
this comment needs more likes
At the end, I was like “how is this going to sound good?”
It didn’t.
I rembered when I first listened to this, I thought “wheres the joke? This sounds pretty normal to me.”
Then came the horn passage at 5:24 and I just burst out laughing!
I think the horns are the most accessible part of the piece ... everyone can laugh at that regardless of what they know of music theory
@MrAdamNTProtester
The modulation in the Rondo amazed me more than made me laugh, as I felt that it sounded ahead of it’s time.
That’s almost a Jazz modulation!
The first movement isn't really that obvious about its funniness - it just sounds awkward (the theme is really unimaginative and has this repetitive rhythm that gets kind of annoying when it's repeated throughout the movement), and it kind of makes you think "WTF was this composer thinking". To me, the most awkward part is the repeat after the ending. I know people don't always play repeats, but the repeat in the end really fits this piece, because it makes it sound even more awkward. "Oh, the piece ended here... Nope, it continues - MAKE IT STOP!"
I would love to understand musical composition to say, "HA HA! I get it!" But alas..
Understanding it really doesnt make it much funnier. You have to be a very specific type of music nerd to get more than two or three chuckles out of this, as you really have to know a lot about what music in mozarts time was like. Nowadays there is so much shitty music that this sounds more like some attempt to add jazzy elements to classical composing methods, back when it was written it would have sounded much more weird to our ears and it wouldnt necessarily have to be understood to be funny.
@Steven Moore Thanks! I feel better. I think...
@@Zirc0nium69 I thought that too: my ears were not too bothered by some of the highlighted jokes and I wondered how much of that is influenced by the music that surrounds us today. Knowing context makes a difference in how I understand what was happening. Btw, @Richard Atkinson, I really appreciate your analysis - very educational and eye-opening for me. :)
I'm enjoying pretending that I understand why this piece is funny 😅
I broke out in laughter with the wrong notes horn part! I had no idea Mozart ever did this, and now I'm making that short segment my ringtone
I had never heard this piece before. The analysis is great, andI had much fun with the video. Almost couldn’t believe Mozart wrote the final chord.
I couldn't help, but hear *womp, womp, wooomp* at the very end. Such a fitting finish for a great piece of gag music.
When Mozart tries to sound bad, it sounds way better than I could sound if I tried to sound good. Assuming I ever learned to do all this, dots on a page stuff.
"Fun" is indeed the correct translation. There is no particular "joke" as such, it's just Mozart taking the piss. Sort of like a Spike Jones of his day. The purpose of music is to entertain, and if it serves that purpose, then it's not a bad composition. And indeed, it's not meant to be bad: the piece utilises "bad" elements to create fun, and if it succeeded, then the composition was actually a good one.
Gee thanks for the clarification... I am no longer feeling ashamed.... however I do detect some measure of rage arising?!!?
MrAdamNTProtester saAaaame
That horn part sounds like a bit of Stravinsky's neo classical composing.
I've tried to listen to Stravinsky's firebird but couldn't enjoy it.
Krzysztof Q I had the same initial reaction to the firebird. I think I was able to enjoy the Rite of Spring simply due to its cultural prevalence; I had been exposed to it many times through Fantasia and Cosmos as a kid. Stravinsky’s music takes some time to settle in, but once you get it, it is amazing.
@@Not_what_it_used_to_be I've been meaning to make videos about both Firebird and The Rite, so stay tuned for them! I hope Krzysztof will also watch them - maybe I'll change his mind!
Best Stravinsky is Pulcinella, based off of properly good music.
the part where there is a sequence of three sol (which do is the outcome of the sound) is a little part of the melody in the wet-nurses' dance in Petrushka
Thank you for pointing out all the gags. I missed some of these, and probably a bunch of others you didn't get to. I will review the score and a recording carefully. THANK YOU!!!
This isn't as bad as I thought it'd be. I was expecting something more chaotic and atonal. Some of the ideas are actually interesting, like the head-fake modulations. The only part that's violent to the ears is the finale chords. Even that wobbly horn part wasn't too bad; it's jazzy and Stravinsky-esque.
it's cause some of these things doesn't sound so strange to us like it would sound for the ears of the time. We are used to modern music and dissonant chords.
Beyond that, this recording is too clean and correctly played, and they are playing modern instruments. So, many of jokes are kind of lost.
Plus parallel fifths aren't considered to be bad like they were in Mozart's day
Mozart wouldn’t call it “jazzy and Stravinsky-esque” because in his day there was no such thing as jazz, and Stravinsky wasn’t born yet, let alone writing music.
I think that’s the point: Music is a much different thing now (or should I say, so many different things) than it was in the Classical era.
it doesn't sound bad because you are used to pretending that amateur compositions that don't follow any rationale outside of having a decent melody while all voice leading is random and the form being nonexistent are actually good.
@@Whatismusic123punctuation? Syntaxis? Logic? Never learnt those at school?
Man, I was having so much fun I didn't even notice this was 22 minutes long.
Nice video. I think the translation is good though, because "Spaß" is something different than "e i n Spaß", which is well translated as joke or prank
The etymology may be similar for SPASTIC
In Italian spasso, meaning fun!
The deadpan narration using so many derogatory terms clashes hilariously with the lighthearted piece. The commentary along with the visual indication of recurring and similar parts is very informative though! It's one of the rare cases when explaining the joke makes it actually thrive.
I wonder how much Mozart enjoyed composing this piece. Not just as a parody either. I like to think it was refreshing for him to not have to follow all the rules for once and to be allowed to experiment musically with a free pass to do so without tarnishing his reputation as a composer, especially since it’s a humorous piece to begin with. It must have been fun
Some of it, amongst the flagrant rule breaking, seem like an earnest attempt at making music. In that way, it may have been something of a guilty pleasure. And likely a very cathartic one at that
I wonder if he wrote more “sacrilegious boi” music that he kept secret, or perhaps even published under a pseudonym
It seems to me that a lot of the things that were regarded as jokes back then are now common elements in music (movie and game music etc).
ruclips.net/video/ErjZh1cQTg8/видео.html
The last few seconds are probably the most 20th century thing composed during the classical period.
Unfortunately you are correct... in 1776 we had the Declaration, in 1788-9 we had the Federalist papers... today we have a rhyming dictionary & a drum machine & dueling scatologualists [ NEW WORD- Hooray!] ... oh how the mighty have fallen
The modulation in that quintet dedicated to Haydn is beyond fantastic. I had no Idea such musical expressions were possible- it's almost like modulating to the dominant key twice!
Maybe you meant quartet?
The pizzicato G at 6:08 always gets me
Emperor in the movie Amadeus: "I don't get it... is it modern?"
Modern listener: "I hear nothing wrong with this."
*0:22** "Published on April 2"...*
Mr. A., I am so incredibly grateful to you. I have known this famous piece most of my adult life, but had no idea so much was hidden from me, through my inadequate musical knowledge. You are like a code-breaker who shows how a difficult code is broken, though inexperienced eyes (or ears) would not see it as a code in the first place. I will never hear this piece in the same way again.... how clever of Mozart to encode these jokes so deftly, where only expert eyes could see them. Thank you very much
Oh my God, those final chords sounds absolutely like Shostakovich
Yes, there were times, in fact, in the piece, where it progressed into a later Classical period and sounded good by those standards.
@@brandonwainscott7491 And the "wrong" horn is just typical Debussy
Mozart: writes a piece that is meant to be be a literal joke; still sounds good
Modern composers: try their hardest; sound even worse than Mozart’s joke
Mozart had to follow the strictest rules. To deviate just a little was comical and to do more than that was not even considered music at all. Of course it still sounds good.
Meanwhile modern classical music is hell bent on breaking every and all rules, while modern pop is simplified for the masses.
5:25 That sounds good to your ear?!
No, but it still sounds like situational music.
I like classical music and listen a lot to it, and, yes, I can definitely hear that this is a joking composition, but I have to admit that the joking nature of certain parts of it escapes me. Richard Atkinson obviously has a much deeper insight into the intricacies of music than I have. I have sometimes had the urge to compose music in the classical style, but now I feel afraid that whatever I produce would be laughed at.
Big Paradox just take all the things described here as amateurish and don’t do them. Mozart covered all the bases for musical mistakes 😜
I think it would be more accurate to say Mr. Atkinson has an inclination to analyze the fun out of music.
Don't be scared of gaining experience in composing music! I remember in sixth grade I arranged pachelbels Canon in D and I thought I was really good. Looking back it was complete garbage and I ruined the piece, but because I wasn't scared of being bad I kept improving my composing skills and now I'm writing a marching show for my senior year of high school which we will march later this year.
@@chriscarlisle777, yeah, you are right, of course.
Yes it is such a TRUTH: because of Mozart many would be Scalaeri's (or however you spell that dude's name) have folded up & slinked away... NEVER to be heard from again.....
Until it's time for another commercial Jingle $$$
ive lost count of how many times ive watched this video...this and your badass nielsen moments video are probably two of the videos i rewatch the most on this site!
I love how there is a part where it’s supposed to imitate a string breaking.
Clever writing.
Thank you for the great presentation. It's wonderful to have the spoken exposition and then to hear all the sections in performance with the highlighted score.
mozart: makes a song with mistakes that are almost unnoticeable to amateurs and is roasted by OP
me trying to compose a good piece: sweats nervously
*that moment when everything in this video describes the latest score you composed*
@Steven Moore thats about right
Luckily, Mozart did not always write like this! Although, it is humbling to know that his "jokes" were far better than I can ever do!
That string tuning was hilarious! Also, is it just me or does 5:23 sound somewhat similar to one of the Harry Potter themes?
so true about the harry potter part. im thinking "hogwarts forever" theme. or something similar
seems as if harry potter music is a little inspired by some of the odd quirky works such as this because it embodies the whimsy of the movies, but I think what you're specifically thinking is something along the lines of this scene ruclips.net/video/DyRS04EVlvQ/видео.html
Don't know who you are Richard Atkinson, but you made my day! Incredible professionalism!
Thank you Mr. Atkinson. I know this piece and its purpose, but the most funny thing about it is that the work as a whole is quite pleasant to listen to, a real Mozart.
This Mozart guy is pretty good, can’t wait to see what he does next
you wont
Now he's de-composing...
Mozart trolled us before trolling was cool.
Also before cool was cool!
... Though there was "sprezzatura", which was cool.
Those horns playing the wrong notes made me giggle uncontrollably.
Interesting that the abrupt modulation examples and irregular syntactical phrasings or bar groupings, here a joke, become a virtue, an integrated part of the syntactical vocabulary of the Romantic era, notably Schubert and Brahms.
5:36 Hot take: First Violin is trying to show off by playing really high during the cadenza, but he can't find the notes because the stops are too close. So he gets whole tones. His expedition ends with the string breaking.
“A bit of musical fun” is a much more apt translation because he is using these “bad” ideas to create an engaging piece.
Thank you for making this! 25 years ago, I heard this on a classical music radio station, in the middle of the night, and the dissonant horn passage stuck with me. Then, for whatever reason, when I would search for "Mozart musical joke" I would get completely different results! Now I know the original German title! Thanks again!
I actually like the string tuning part, and the chaotic ending
The string tuning break is from Haydn like the winding of the CLOCK in his clock symphony
I think (many years ago) the main tune of the finale was used as intro music for horseracing on TV.
- or maybe showjumping, which was very popular on TV in UK.
I wonder if there was a specific composer who motivated Mozart to produce this hilarious, brilliant satire, almost Swiftian in its savagery. Great job, as usual. Your videos are one of the joys of the internet.
Maybe Jannequin? But I doubt Mozart could hear his works or study the score. Besides Musical Fun goes more far because it illustrates, imitates not only sounds of nature (birds) or battle, but unable composer and performers...
Concerning polytonality, there are some older works where it occurs - I have one probably Rennaisance piece imitation of Jewish music, which is bitonal. And Biber's Battaglia has one polytonal movement...
Sir, thank you for taking so much time to painstakingly explain the music here...
Mozart: Hahahaha, the fine ladies at the ball will be be SO triggered by all these parallel fifths!
Metalhead: Bruh, my music is made almost entirely of parallel fifths!
I always liked classical music but I never knew what really went into it. Thanks for these videos!
At 22:11... that really sounds like a Schoenberg's quartet final chords more than Mozart.
That's hilarious. Well that kinda raises the question of how the atonal music really are... All that intelligent work, but I often get the feeling that you could achieve the same goal, by randomly making up dissonances as a ground plan, and you could easily fool someone by making up a very "intelligent" description of the composition process, which is what everyone focuses on anyway, not how it sounds
@@ru99414 That's what the new complexity folks do.
Funny since Schönberg said that he learned the most from Mozart
I've heard people unironically try to argue that the whole tone scale in the third movement and the chords in the final movement are "Mozart trying to break new tonal ground".
@@steffen5121 There's a lot what contemporary composer can still learn from Mozart. Not much from his using the scales, harmony, rhythm - but compositional thinking, working with information, working with motifs, working with form, relation between contents and form, working with consonance an dissonance, music psychology...
Lip trills are also needed for modern horns with valves. Due to the way the harmonic series works on a horn, you often have two notes that are next to each other with no change of valves. With all of the multiple fingerings available for many of these notes, you CAN involves valves, but a skilled horn player will get a better result with a lip trill.
7:35 I very like that modulation actually! But I'm [probably not listening with classical ears...
Leander Schoormans it’s too jarring
It's actually not quite so abrupt as the commentary in this video would have us believe. A flat major is, as stated, quite far out in left field to start with, and sounds it (at least a bit) even to our post-Wagner, post-Brahms ears. But then from A flat major it works its way around to that key's relative minor -- which is F minor -- a smooth move to a closely related key.
The F major bit comes in immediately after a very clear cadence in F minor, so it's really just a slide from minor to major on the same tonic (F) -- a example of so-called "modal interchange" (which can go in either direction). It's a pretty standard move in classic and early romantic music, and, come to think of it, in later (and some earlier) music as well. And that, I think, is probably why the appearance of F major isn't disturbing to you.
I hope I've explained this in a way that makes sense to you.