This might be a dumb question but aren't you supposed to be against people violating the Constitution? I mean if it's okay for you to do it why can't they do it too?
@@quickenmyend I was told a long time ago that, "There ais no such thing as dumb questions, Just dumb people". I am of course joking. However this is a which came first the chicken or the egg statement because democrats in this instant are violating the constitution. Californians are not given a vote choice on any of these laws and we are also not given a meaningful education either. we are constantly battling these laws in a circuit court that is hostile against law biding gun ownership to the point where it is beyond obvious to the very point where a petty law was passed based on a law in another state in which we would have to pay all the court fees if we were ever to bring fourth a lawsuit against the state and lost that we would have to pay California lawyer fees. sorry for the rant.
@@RSTI191 I wouldn't go that far, I think they should live in a socialist or communist country to face the realities for which they stand. if they still have such a strong desire for absolute control they can have mars.
Hold on a second years ago feinstein said it was perfectly legal to hunt humans with 30-round magazine make up your minds. Kidding just trying to show that politicians know Jack schitt about
As people familiar with firearms know, most modern pistols - whether full-size, compact, or subcompact - come with magazines of 8 to 17 rounds; they are not "high-capacity," but standard-capacity. A politician with an anti-gun agenda apparently decided to call standard-capacity magazines "high-capacity," to promote the idea that they are more-than-standard, "more than what anyone needs" (in *his* opinion).
the fact is, magazines are not hard to get. You can easily grab them out of state, or even order them online. Criminals dont give a crap, so why limit law abiding citizens? Judge did the right thing.
I live in OR and i get so mad about the way they treat Californians when it comes to your 2A rights, you guys live in one of the most dangerous states, so im glad to hear this 2A forever 🇺🇲
This law does nothing to affect criminals, so the statement about them having to reload is invalid because they don’t use 10 round magazines they carry normal magazines and 30rounders
The second amendment was written into the constitution by the founding fathers to protect citzens from a tyrannical government. Our state has some of the most strengent gun control in the country and has for over forty years! Gun control only effects people who respect and fallow the law. Criminals dont do either if you want proof take a stroll through east oakland, watts, or san Francisco. Fortunately we live in a city that enforces the law, i wouldn't wander around anywhere in LA, or the bay area at this point. And if gun control is so wonderful why are people being shot on a daily basis in these cities you cant even walk to the store anymore without the threat of being shot. If anything citizens should be properly trained with there gun so they can protect themselves...
It won't make any difference. They'll just pass a new law that effectively do the same thing. It takes years for these laws to wend their way through the courts.
A Federal Judge has zero authority to overturn California's ban on "high-capacity" magazines. California is an independent sovereign "nation" state. Here's some Constitution 101: ruclips.net/video/PFvmzorPlPo/видео.html
Article 4 of the Constitution is very clear about belligerence against the Organic State legislator and clearly state's that the "Only form 9f government is a Republican form of government not a democracy form of government 😂.
There is no constitutional right guaranteed to firearms owners. In addition, there is no right to own guns. And, you don't need a high capacity magazine for your firearm to work.
Your first sentence is a contradiction in itself! In addition, as you put it, it literally is the 2nd one in our bill of rights! Third sentence, it’s none of your business!😂🤣
10 rounds isn't a "high-capacity" magazine. This is an anti-gun propaganda term.
just as "assault rifle" is another term they hijacked to use in their propaganda
Finally, a California judge with some common sense. How about arresting criminals that get guns the illegal way!!
The Democrat Socialist Party Politburo's Kommissars are utterly terrified of Judge Benito
No can’t do that, too much common sense involved
This is a good step for us law abiding citizens in California next step should be the magazine release needs to be talked about
They’re not “high capacity” they’re standard capacity magazines. Politicians know that by changing definitions they can maintain control.
Not all heroes wear capes! 🙌🏽
Thank you! I will vote accordingly to keep our rights.
They’re not “high capacity”
They’re standard capacity
Exactly, there is standard capacity and neutered capacity.
BRAVO 👏 GOD JOB JUDGE.
If a person already owns guns how does a 10 day waiting period make sense?
It doesnt and never has.
Good point
It does not. No rhyme or reason.
I've wondered about this......about 20 times. Dumb
We Californian's should just outlaw Democrats from the state.
I bet that would fix it
This might be a dumb question but aren't you supposed to be against people violating the Constitution? I mean if it's okay for you to do it why can't they do it too?
Why stop there? The entire Planet..
@@quickenmyend I was told a long time ago that, "There ais no such thing as dumb questions, Just dumb people". I am of course joking.
However this is a which came first the chicken or the egg statement because democrats in this instant are violating the constitution. Californians are not given a vote choice on any of these laws and we are also not given a meaningful education either. we are constantly battling these laws in a circuit court that is hostile against law biding gun ownership to the point where it is beyond obvious to the very point where a petty law was passed based on a law in another state in which we would have to pay all the court fees if we were ever to bring fourth a lawsuit against the state and lost that we would have to pay California lawyer fees. sorry for the rant.
@@RSTI191 I wouldn't go that far, I think they should live in a socialist or communist country to face the realities for which they stand. if they still have such a strong desire for absolute control they can have mars.
Hold on a second years ago feinstein said it was perfectly legal to hunt humans with 30-round magazine make up your minds.
Kidding just trying to show that politicians know Jack schitt about
2A Win! Let’s go!
As people familiar with firearms know, most modern pistols - whether full-size, compact, or subcompact - come with magazines of 8 to 17 rounds; they are not "high-capacity," but standard-capacity. A politician with an anti-gun agenda apparently decided to call standard-capacity magazines "high-capacity," to promote the idea that they are more-than-standard, "more than what anyone needs" (in *his* opinion).
All praise Saint Benitez
So can you buy +10 round magazines today in California?
That’s what I’m askin 😂
Standard capacity magazines. Corrected it for ya.
There is no such thing as a high capacity magazines. There’s standard then there’s 10 rounders
It's STANDARD capacity magazine NOT HIGH capacity. Rifles have come with 30 round magazines forever.
Yes okay but what about scary all black fully semi automatic assault machine guns that you gun kooks love? Ever think of the children?
the fact is, magazines are not hard to get. You can easily grab them out of state, or even order them online. Criminals dont give a crap, so why limit law abiding citizens? Judge did the right thing.
We can’t order magazines online, they will not ship to California if they hold more than 10 rounds
@@213chewyclearly your going to the wrong websites. Some know it's unconstitutional and shop mags and ammo to California.
@@wannabecarguy nice try DOJ
@@213chewyoh he’s right, they also can’t stop those road trips to Reno, Vegas or Oregon and either
So, we still can't use regular capacity magazines in our firearms.
So can I now fly into California with a 17 round mag without becoming a felon?
Gavin Newsome signed a bill today that will tax guns and ammo an additional 11% !
Commiefornia for you.
Eventually this will be struck down. You can't charge a poll tax to vote, you can't tax other Constitutional rights.
I live in OR and i get so mad about the way they treat Californians when it comes to your 2A rights, you guys live in one of the most dangerous states, so im glad to hear this 2A forever 🇺🇲
I'll stick with a 10-round mag, if California law enforcement can guarantee that the bad guys will abide by this rule as well.
This law does nothing to affect criminals, so the statement about them having to reload is invalid because they don’t use 10 round magazines they carry normal magazines and 30rounders
How long before 9th circuit takes the case
already happened. they extended the stay until 10/10
My car's 14 gallon gas tank is "High Capacity" This morning, I purchased a "High Capacity" bag of bagels, and a "High Capacity" cup of coffee..
Can off Duty law enforcement carry high capacity mags ?
Of course. Most laws don’t apply to police, only to filthy civilians.
Cops are above the law.
@@legendofthefall7082They should be held to the same standards as we civilians are
@@slender169101 agreed
Newsome and Bonta should both move to Venezuela or Afghanustan... 🙄 or Iran...
These are standard capacity not high capacity get it right
I still have yet to see this thing called "high capacity magazine"
Now we need to repel the bs ammunition back ground check....
How long will it take for that ruling to get to Connecticut?
If pilice have more rounds then the people deserve thisright .
We citizens only want what the criminals have access to (within reason).
"its tradition in other states" doesn't allow you to break the law. these law and order types aren't the brightest
First off!!!
Why is she using a fake voice???
If the police can have them, we can have them
The second amendment was written into the constitution by the founding fathers to protect citzens from a tyrannical government. Our state has some of the most strengent gun control in the country and has for over forty years! Gun control only effects people who respect and fallow the law. Criminals dont do either if you want proof take a stroll through east oakland, watts, or san Francisco. Fortunately we live in a city that enforces the law, i wouldn't wander around anywhere in LA, or the bay area at this point. And if gun control is so wonderful why are people being shot on a daily basis in these cities you cant even walk to the store anymore without the threat of being shot. If anything citizens should be properly trained with there gun so they can protect themselves...
Ok so what about the other states that have these stupid bans?
can we go buy them now?
Im so glade this judge knows the right to bear arms
They need to worry about criminals and feces on the streets ! Shall not be infringed. Period
pretty as a peach
So, we can get 50 rounds magazine???
Republicans California lives
It won't make any difference. They'll just pass a new law that effectively do the same thing. It takes years for these laws to wend their way through the courts.
How does a state have standing against the Constitution? Only Congress's can change the law.
A Federal Judge has zero authority to overturn California's ban on "high-capacity" magazines. California is an independent sovereign "nation" state. Here's some Constitution 101: ruclips.net/video/PFvmzorPlPo/видео.html
California is great at losing at everything
FREEDOM 🇺🇸
GOOD !!!
Article 4 of the Constitution is very clear about belligerence against the Organic State legislator and clearly state's that the "Only form 9f government is a Republican form of government not a democracy form of government 😂.
You smoke a lot of meth huh?
Beautiful 2nd amendment is alive
👏👏👏
The people are going to need high capacity when they start wiping out all the looters
We going to keep it at 10 we don't care what y'all talkin about
There is no constitutional right guaranteed to firearms owners. In addition, there is no right to own guns. And, you don't need a high capacity magazine for your firearm to work.
Your first sentence is a contradiction in itself! In addition, as you put it, it literally is the 2nd one in our bill of rights! Third sentence, it’s none of your business!😂🤣
You are short bus special for real. There is a reason for the 2nd amendment. If you dont know and understand that reason, you are part of the problem
Please help us in NYS next 🫡
Nice