Haha thank you for taking the time to watch and drop a compliment! Lots more content like this in the works so hope you’ll stay tuned to check what I’ve got in the works. Also do me a factor and share word of the channel with your buddies!
The flow of your videos are getting so good dude. You are by far my favorite gun guy on RUclips. I hope nothing but greater success for you. Thank you for all the knowledge you share with us.
Thank you! Really appreciate the compliments and the support! I’m making a legitimate effort to grow this channel so you should start seeing lots of new content through year end…. My hope is that every video gets better than the last one and provides the viewer some kind of valuable takeaway. Hope you’ll stay tuned and don’t forget to share my channel with your buddies!
Awesome review on the Impact 4000. You are very clear and concise in your explanations of the equipment you are using and how you are using it. I’m sold! Looks like a real game changer for long range rifle shooting. You have the most incredibly beautiful “range” and scenery to exercise the 2nd amendment. Keep that content coming!
just so everyone is aware, the zero point of the rangefinder is set Independently from the reticule of the scope. As stated in the video, they are not meant to converge (also meaning they are not meant to diverge). Utilizing it in the method portrayed in the video will result in inaccurate readings. This is worth adding a disclaimer in the video as the consequences could be rather drastic. For example, in the video he states that a proper zero from the reticule is .8 Mils at 100 yards, Which would equate to roughly 2.88 inches *(at 100 yards). Assuming the Height Over Bore (Rather the line of sight through the center of the scope -A.K.A crosshairs) is 2.88 Inches below the Line of sight of the IR/visible Laser that fires to take the range reading this is the proper setup and will always accurately return a reading of 100 Yards when he uses the .8 Mil mark in the scope. BUT ONLY AT 100 YARDS. At distance continuing to use the .8 mil mark in the scope will return an incorrect reading as you would ultimately be ranging in front of the target you are trying to hit. Basically Mil and MOA are both angular measurements and you can think of them as "expanding" at distance. We've established that .8 mils At 100 yards is 2.88 inches, but at 200 yards .8mils is 5.76 inches, At 500 yards .8mils is 14.4 inches, and at 1000 yards .8 mills is 28.8 inches, ETC... As the line of sight of the scope is independent of the Vis/IR laser for the rangefinder (meaning they do not converge or diverge, rather they remain in parallel), the original distance measurement would still apply, not the angular measurement taken via the reticule. The Rangefinder will always return a reading from 2.88 Inches above the centerline (crosshairs) of your scope. The correct way to range these targets at distance would be to put them in the crosshairs (as long as your scope is still zeroed at the original 100 yard mark) and take a range, rather then continue to use the .8 Mil mark as he does in the video. This worked well for him in the video, and will probably work well in most target applications as they typically have some sort of immediate backdrop to catch rouge bullets. But where this can be dicey is for anyone utilizing this tool in a hunting application, as often times deer do not have an immediate backdrop and have a significant amount of "negative space" between the portion you are trying to hit and the ground. in theory, you could ultimately range under the deer's body, and actually return a range 100 yards (or more/less) behind it from a hill, tree, or other animal resulting in a missed shot or worse, a wounded deer. All this to say, great video showcasing this piece of exciting new tech to an industry that has been rather underserved by our modern capability's in electronics and computing. Glad to see you showing it to your audience and I will be subscribing to see more videos from you in the future! (Edited for understanding)
10 месяцев назад
One thing he adjusted his turet, did he not say that you should only use holdover
@@deadmenwalkingsavtheusa7594 if you copy the methodology in the video for set-up, just use your crosshairs to range the target PRIOR to adjusting the turrets. If you need to range again, return the scope to the original zero setting put your crosshairs on the target and take a range, then readjust the turrets to the output of the RF. The rangefinder will always return a distance measurement 2.88 inches above the center dot of your crosshair (given its set to the original hundred yard zero) regardless of how far away what your ranging is. (A laser does not follow a parabolic flight path, rather is a straight line from A-B) if your scope already has adjustment dialed in to the turret your ranging significantly higher/lower from your point of aim. Let me know if this helps.
@@deadmenwalkingsavtheusa7594 in other words, just make sure the line of sight through the scope and the visible laser are as parallel as possible. You don't want them to converge or diverge, because the vortex laser will depart from the scope reticle and measure some other distance (than what is in the scope crosshairs).
I think you may have misunderstood how the divergence of the laser from your line of sight works. If your line of sight and the laser are both a straight line and they are 3 inches apart on the gun and 3 inches apart at 100 yards then they are also 3" apart at every other distance. So at 500 yards you'd only need to aim about .2 mills under your intended ranging target to have your laser centered on the target. At 1,000 yards it would be within .1 mils of your center cross hair etc... This is why Vortex recommends to zero it this way. The farther away you range the closer the laser is to your center cross hair. This is a simple case of mixing up a fixed offset with a fixed angular subtension. In the video you were likely picking up the ground at the bottom of the 1,000 yard target and most other targets with the laser so it still gives an accurate range and holdover. Anyways, great shooting.
So help me out here...the 3" offset applies only if you "range" at your 100-yard zero, correct? If you were dialed at (say 10 mils for example) then your target could be in the crosshairs, but the laser would be pointed up from the target, right? Said another way, you need to range with your scope at 0, and if you have anything dialed, your laser/ranging will be off.
@@SuperSnallygasterthe 3" (or whatever yours is) offset is always there and should be perfectly parallel if you measured correctly. If you dial you are off by 3" plus the angle you dialled. You could possibly hold under whatever you dialled.
Great review! I wanted to note that holding .8 mils under your target is not correct unless you are at 100 yards. The offset will always be 3 inches, but .8 mils is not always 3 inches offset. Holding slightly low (3 inches) is not a bad thing to insure that you're ranging the correct target and not over the top, but that mechanical offset doesn't change with distance like the mil does. 10:40
Well done! My personal impression is that this is the most complete and informative presentation of this thing that I have seen so far. Although... You looked a little bit weird as you flipped and spun the Impact 🤣
Man, it's hard to find videos on RUclips that give great reviews. You're an exception! Great video. Complete, to the point, and easy to follow. I agree. As an owner of an unlocked RAPTAR, the Impact 4000 brings something to the market that most people were not aware of (or could not afford). I have since moved to the Impact 4000 as it offers me more in a better, lifetime-warranty package. First time subscriber here!
That is a goal that I’m working toward. Lots of new content in the works between now and year end so hope you’ll stay tuned to check it out and don’t forget to share my content with your buddies! Thanks for watching
Excellent explanation of the practical use of this device. Thank you for the effort that you put into these videos, and thank you for being upfront and honest about free gear/ammo when provided.
Appreciate you taking the time to watch! I’m having a blast creating content for the channel and really enjoy all the support I’ve received lately. Part of growth is working with companies on various products… certainly I want to capitalize on these opportunities but I want the viewer to have a fair understanding of everything when using my content to make a decision. Lots of new content in the works so hope you’ll stay tuned to check it out!
For someone whose only long range experience is using a Primary Arms ACSS reticle scope, this was so very informative to me. Thank you for the information and for keeping it at an elementary level that I was able to understand. Keep it up!👍🏼
Ha that’s always my debate… do I wait to hear the sound come back before running the bolt or do I try to get on the bolt fast before the sound comes back?? Gotta make sure the viewers can hear the dings!
Really cool to hear you enjoyed the video and my content inspired you to get into long range! Long range shooting is epic but be warned it gets addicting and expensive haha
I appreciate how thorough you are on all your videos, I have the Impact 4000 on my MRAD in 300 NM, I have not had a chance to get out with it yet, but you answered some questions I had. Thank you
Best video That I have seen on the range finder. I will be using this for long-range precision shooting for a big bore airgun known as the Airforce Texan LSS .50 with custom-made bullets looking to break the next big airgun shot in long range. Im looking forward to receiving it in the mail. Thank you for going into detail again. This is the best video on this range finder.
Really awesome to hear your enjoying the content and finding value in watching! I’ve got a lot of new content coming so hope you’ll stay tuned to check it out and don’t forget to share with your buddies!
Great video. On the subject on the gear review type video: Fantastic pacing. Didn’t go full reading a spec sheet and explained what bullets you were working with. Easily digestible shooting footage and my respect went up when you stated your misses. If I was in the market for a range finder, this video would have sold me on one. The vortex nation podcast gets douchey and Texas hunters podcast gets kinda rambling. Looking forward to future content.
Excellent video as usual great information on an item I’m interested in. Viewer made a good point on the offset 3” offset will be about .1 mill (I think) at 1000yds, but you were spot on about using your 100 yard zero to range. Good job, hope to see more from you soon.😊
Man, I love this channel, but I'm sooo jealous of the land you have to shoot in. I'm lucky if I can get out to 300 yards in Western Wa. Keep up the good work, I've learned a lot from you.
Awesome review! Think it’s already been said but the reason for zeroing the laser .8 mils above the reticle at 100yds is so it maintains a consistent zero 3 inches above POA and that distance stays the same at all distances, only being .8mils at 100yds
I’ll tell you what I’m thinking. I’m thinking I want to get into longer range stuff. I train with 556 up to 500 but mostly 200 and in and I’d like to get a nice longer range setup and would love to have some nice glass and one of these rangefinders. Cool seeing a company like Vortex applying pressure to some if they higher tier brands that are 5X’s the ticket of the Impact 4000. I think the Wilcox is unobtainable for most of us. This is a realistic option for a lot of shooters. The setup process on this thing is hilarious 😂 no big deal but just funny. You could’ve given me a million guesses on how to set this thing up and spinning and swinging it in the air in a figure eight motion wouldn’t have crossed my mind😂😂
I’ve got the 300nm barrel and actually launched a video earlier this year showing how it performed… check out the link below if you’re interested. Appreciate you taking the time to watch and support the channel! 300 Norma Mag in action….. The military’s new sniper round! ruclips.net/video/6KnQCh4HcCU/видео.html
I live in a place where the tree line goes to the top of mountains. If I can find a place where i can see 1000yards straight, I cant see the splash. Very jealous of your landscape!
Love, your videos !!’ You keep making and I’ll keep watching. Could the difference in how much you tightened the vortex have caused the non return to zero?
You know that’s a great point and something I didn’t even think about. Yes it’s very possible inconsistent torque is what lead to the poi shift. Might have to grab a torque wrench and try the poi shift test again sometime.
Great job giving us an overview of the Vortex Impact 4000! For adjusting Windage, I believe the device can accept data inputs from a Kestrel via Bluetooth.
This is true but you need the app to transfer data from kestrel. Flow is like this Kestrel->App->Impact. Once data is on the Impact it will be retained and you can close the app until the next time you want to update it. I usually just read wind from the kestrel and manually input that wind on the Impact
Im curious what its limits are and what the beam divergence is. Im also interested to see a follow up video 5 or 6 months down the road to see what your thoughts are after time behind it.
Funny how well your Content matches my needs I have a open box I just received Impact 4000 I could not pair my remote control but seems like you didn’t use one or the App thank you so much for your time sharing your experience much Respect Bill W.
If the light on the remote is blinking orange, which is easy to mistake as red in sunlight, you need to press and hold up/down on the remote to make it discoverable by other devices. It will blink red when it is discoverable. The remote can be added by the Impact directly if you don't want to use the app
Well done sir. Enjoyed the video and the content about the 4000. I’m still waiting for some of the pitfalls to show up before I actually buy one, but I’m sure interested in it. Keep up the good work sir.
I appreciate the approach you took to explain how you synced the range finder with mount to the optic. I also appreciate your transparency towards the end of the video where you include some of your misses. Just subbed, great work, look forward to the next vid.👍
Really cool to hear you enjoyed watching this one! Also I appreciate the sub, lots more content just like this in the works so hope you’ll stay tuned. On the topic of the misses… that’s part of the game. We’re not all sub moa all day shooters and none of us have 100% hit percentages so just out here trying to create content that gives viewers a look at reality for the average shooter.
Great stuff man. Really appreciate the attention to detail you bring into these videos. I can see that segment about return to zero being a very useful bit of information for serious buyers.
Waiting for the next model to come with LIDAR to detect wind speed down range instead of guessing or using local wind speeds measured with a Kestral anemometer
@@MountainsMulletsMerica the zero was good, but it was a parallel zero meaning the laser and the center of your dot are parallel forever. You were ranging on a diverging zero (.8mil at your gun vs ~3in at the target). It didn't hurt you because all your targets you shot were backstopped by large berms, so errors were small compared to your danger space.
Relative to other options (if they're even there), the Impact 4000 is indeed bangin' for the $1,999 price tag for what it does. Also, thanks for the quality education and content. It's really helping me warm-up on my journey to longrange shooting for when I get there.
Now that I’ve got a bit over a year or so of experience with the impact 4000 I can confidently tell you this thing is awesome. My opinion it’s a must have piece of kit for the practical precision rifleman. Appreciate you taking the time to watch!
@@MountainsMulletsMerica Your attentiveness to comments is impressive good sir. I see you have been enjoying 14.5" 6.5 Creedmoor DMR set ups. I would encourage you to get your hands on a Desert Tech WLVRN in 6.5 CM...20" barrel in a 7.5lb, shorter package. Accuracy reports seem to be excellent.
I got their fury binoculars with applied ballistics so i can use it with multiple rifles without buying new mounts or setting it up every time i use a different rifle. If you have one dedicated lr rifle though being able to range right off your rifle is the way to go. Ill wait for holosun to come out with their version half price and half the size lol
For zeroing, why not just adjust so the laser and line of site are parallel? A 3" vertical offset between the laser and the line of sight isn't going to do anything to the ballistic calculation
I have the razor 4000 GB works great but on this one unless I’m wrong I don’t think it would serve my purposes if every time I’m going to use it on a different Rifle I have to zero the rangefinder to the new Rifle
That's an excellent point. I did not think about that. Switching could be a pain. But as shown, taking it off and reattaching to the same rifle could cause issues. But if you have one main long range rifle, this would be spot on. I have been looking hard at the 4000 GB myself. Bushnell was supposed to release the same type of rangefinder, with built in Ballistic data. But they cannot seem to figure out when or if to release. Probably too many issues. I use the Match Pro for NRL22 and wanted to stay with them. The 4000 GB is a little out of my price point at the moment.
@@rangerdanger126 well the razor 4000 GB has the same software Ballistics that’s in the 4000 impact. I have too many Rifles to be taking it off one putting it on a different one and having to rezero that’s too much of a hassle, the razor 4000 GB works great
Been playing with one for the last couple weeks. Had it out to 1300 so far. Used my kestrel data to build profiles. Onboard ballistics were spot on out to about 1100. Started to see some variances between AB and Geo past 1100. My intended purpose is team match and honestly will likely only use ranging with armboard and not ballistics. My 52 year old eyes have a little issue with the display in the ballistics mode. HCD display much better for me. They could probably offer some font options in firmware. Yes it’s big but sub $2k versus the alternatives will be a winner.
I wonder if you could fit a torque wrench on the nuts. You may get return to zero if precisely torquing the attachment nuts every time. Maybe one of the small fix it stick type tools to keep in the Barrett case.
I think this could very likely be the case. I just torqued the nuts using the included tool from vortex. Hard to say if I applied the same torque each time. Might have to re test poi shift with a torque wrench in a future video
A non bias comparison between their system and Sig's BDX would be interesting. I find that Vortex's system makes it big and clunky in the field. More likely to bump it on something.
1- you're pretty good. 2- that thing's impressive. Those first shot impacts are very nice. 3- probably not too far away from an AI scope that 'moves' the reticle for you. This is halfway there it seems.
I dig it. Definitely on my wishlist. I just have a hard time justifying this over a set of good range finding binos that aren’t slaved to a specific rifle.
Well if you remember you put in Windage for like 5mph left to right, and you were just ignoring the ballistics when shooting the first day. So maybe when you took it off, or before, you forgot 0 windsge? Then put it back on forgetting you had it set? Bc it’s was telling you 2-3 windage adjust but ignored them??
It says you should remove and recalibrate it every time you change locations by 30 miles. Seems kind of annoying on an otherwise solid unit. Not sure if it would work but it would be nice to be able to save compass settings for a given location.
Yes it does say that…. For some reason mine now gives trouble with the calibration process so I just quit doing it. Hasn’t caused any issues so I’m not sure how necessary the re calibrations really are
I personally believe it is worth the $2k price tag if you can shoot long-range. I unfortunately don't have anywhere easily accessible to shoot long range. It looks like a lot of fun, and I would like to be able to try it sometime
Thanks for another great video and showing us what looks to be a great tool. I'd love to hear your thoughts on how well the app works with the unit in practical use.
@MountainsMulletsMerica I would be interested to hear your take on this also. Generally, I like to use without the app because it is a standalone device. The app does have some added functionality and is easier to read and navigate compared to the device. Some notable functions specific to the app are: Using multi B.C bullets from the library, MV temp tables, sharing profiles and range cards via text/email, storing more than 10 profiles, pulling weather from airports or 3rd party devices, using Impact to drop pins on a map, exclude/include things like spin drift, aero jump and Coriolis in the ballistic calculation (app must be selected as the ballistic source for when connected to the Impact).
Guys out here casually dropping the best long distance videos on RUclips
Haha thank you for taking the time to watch and drop a compliment! Lots more content like this in the works so hope you’ll stay tuned to check what I’ve got in the works. Also do me a factor and share word of the channel with your buddies!
His vids are solid for sure. Have you seen Rex's sniper 101 vids?
Right! Very methodical, step by step easy to understand.
He sure is
😂
The flow of your videos are getting so good dude. You are by far my favorite gun guy on RUclips. I hope nothing but greater success for you. Thank you for all the knowledge you share with us.
Thank you! Really appreciate the compliments and the support! I’m making a legitimate effort to grow this channel so you should start seeing lots of new content through year end…. My hope is that every video gets better than the last one and provides the viewer some kind of valuable takeaway. Hope you’ll stay tuned and don’t forget to share my channel with your buddies!
Awesome review on the Impact 4000. You are very clear and concise in your explanations of the equipment you are using and how you are using it. I’m sold! Looks like a real game changer for long range rifle shooting. You have the most incredibly beautiful “range” and scenery to exercise the 2nd amendment. Keep that content coming!
I can't get over that view
just so everyone is aware, the zero point of the rangefinder is set Independently from the reticule of the scope. As stated in the video, they are not meant to converge (also meaning they are not meant to diverge). Utilizing it in the method portrayed in the video will result in inaccurate readings. This is worth adding a disclaimer in the video as the consequences could be rather drastic.
For example, in the video he states that a proper zero from the reticule is .8 Mils at 100 yards, Which would equate to roughly 2.88 inches *(at 100 yards). Assuming the Height Over Bore (Rather the line of sight through the center of the scope -A.K.A crosshairs) is 2.88 Inches below the Line of sight of the IR/visible Laser that fires to take the range reading this is the proper setup and will always accurately return a reading of 100 Yards when he uses the .8 Mil mark in the scope. BUT ONLY AT 100 YARDS.
At distance continuing to use the .8 mil mark in the scope will return an incorrect reading as you would ultimately be ranging in front of the target you are trying to hit. Basically Mil and MOA are both angular measurements and you can think of them as "expanding" at distance. We've established that .8 mils At 100 yards is 2.88 inches, but at 200 yards .8mils is 5.76 inches, At 500 yards .8mils is 14.4 inches, and at 1000 yards .8 mills is 28.8 inches, ETC...
As the line of sight of the scope is independent of the Vis/IR laser for the rangefinder (meaning they do not converge or diverge, rather they remain in parallel), the original distance measurement would still apply, not the angular measurement taken via the reticule. The Rangefinder will always return a reading from 2.88 Inches above the centerline (crosshairs) of your scope. The correct way to range these targets at distance would be to put them in the crosshairs (as long as your scope is still zeroed at the original 100 yard mark) and take a range, rather then continue to use the .8 Mil mark as he does in the video.
This worked well for him in the video, and will probably work well in most target applications as they typically have some sort of immediate backdrop to catch rouge bullets. But where this can be dicey is for anyone utilizing this tool in a hunting application, as often times deer do not have an immediate backdrop and have a significant amount of "negative space" between the portion you are trying to hit and the ground. in theory, you could ultimately range under the deer's body, and actually return a range 100 yards (or more/less) behind it from a hill, tree, or other animal resulting in a missed shot or worse, a wounded deer.
All this to say, great video showcasing this piece of exciting new tech to an industry that has been rather underserved by our modern capability's in electronics and computing. Glad to see you showing it to your audience and I will be subscribing to see more videos from you in the future!
(Edited for understanding)
One thing he adjusted his turet, did he not say that you should only use holdover
Yes he did.@
Can you put this in a really simple terms? or are you a lawyer.
@@deadmenwalkingsavtheusa7594 if you copy the methodology in the video for set-up, just use your crosshairs to range the target PRIOR to adjusting the turrets.
If you need to range again, return the scope to the original zero setting put your crosshairs on the target and take a range, then readjust the turrets to the output of the RF.
The rangefinder will always return a distance measurement 2.88 inches above the center dot of your crosshair (given its set to the original hundred yard zero) regardless of how far away what your ranging is. (A laser does not follow a parabolic flight path, rather is a straight line from A-B) if your scope already has adjustment dialed in to the turret your ranging significantly higher/lower from your point of aim.
Let me know if this helps.
@@deadmenwalkingsavtheusa7594 in other words, just make sure the line of sight through the scope and the visible laser are as parallel as possible. You don't want them to converge or diverge, because the vortex laser will depart from the scope reticle and measure some other distance (than what is in the scope crosshairs).
Wtf like the most epic background in the world
I think you may have misunderstood how the divergence of the laser from your line of sight works. If your line of sight and the laser are both a straight line and they are 3 inches apart on the gun and 3 inches apart at 100 yards then they are also 3" apart at every other distance. So at 500 yards you'd only need to aim about .2 mills under your intended ranging target to have your laser centered on the target. At 1,000 yards it would be within .1 mils of your center cross hair etc... This is why Vortex recommends to zero it this way. The farther away you range the closer the laser is to your center cross hair.
This is a simple case of mixing up a fixed offset with a fixed angular subtension.
In the video you were likely picking up the ground at the bottom of the 1,000 yard target and most other targets with the laser so it still gives an accurate range and holdover.
Anyways, great shooting.
Thank you. I thought I was going crazy thinking about this all day.
So help me out here...the 3" offset applies only if you "range" at your 100-yard zero, correct? If you were dialed at (say 10 mils for example) then your target could be in the crosshairs, but the laser would be pointed up from the target, right? Said another way, you need to range with your scope at 0, and if you have anything dialed, your laser/ranging will be off.
@@SuperSnallygasterthe 3" (or whatever yours is) offset is always there and should be perfectly parallel if you measured correctly. If you dial you are off by 3" plus the angle you dialled. You could possibly hold under whatever you dialled.
@@Roddy556 Thanks, makes sense.
Great review!
I wanted to note that holding .8 mils under your target is not correct unless you are at 100 yards.
The offset will always be 3 inches, but .8 mils is not always 3 inches offset.
Holding slightly low (3 inches) is not a bad thing to insure that you're ranging the correct target and not over the top, but that mechanical offset doesn't change with distance like the mil does. 10:40
Well done! My personal impression is that this is the most complete and informative presentation of this thing that I have seen so far. Although... You looked a little bit weird as you flipped and spun the Impact 🤣
Man, it's hard to find videos on RUclips that give great reviews. You're an exception! Great video. Complete, to the point, and easy to follow.
I agree. As an owner of an unlocked RAPTAR, the Impact 4000 brings something to the market that most people were not aware of (or could not afford). I have since moved to the Impact 4000 as it offers me more in a better, lifetime-warranty package.
First time subscriber here!
This is the direct benefit we see from a company like vortex getting a gov contract for the NGSW optic. Trickle down of awesome tech.
We need to get this guy to 50k subs by the end of the year.
That is a goal that I’m working toward. Lots of new content in the works between now and year end so hope you’ll stay tuned to check it out and don’t forget to share my content with your buddies! Thanks for watching
Excellent explanation of the practical use of this device. Thank you for the effort that you put into these videos, and thank you for being upfront and honest about free gear/ammo when provided.
Appreciate you taking the time to watch! I’m having a blast creating content for the channel and really enjoy all the support I’ve received lately. Part of growth is working with companies on various products… certainly I want to capitalize on these opportunities but I want the viewer to have a fair understanding of everything when using my content to make a decision. Lots of new content in the works so hope you’ll stay tuned to check it out!
For someone whose only long range experience is using a Primary Arms ACSS reticle scope, this was so very informative to me. Thank you for the information and for keeping it at an elementary level that I was able to understand. Keep it up!👍🏼
When we can hear the plink in the distance on each shot before you run the bolt it's confidence inspiring
Ha that’s always my debate… do I wait to hear the sound come back before running the bolt or do I try to get on the bolt fast before the sound comes back?? Gotta make sure the viewers can hear the dings!
Iv been waiting for the people I follow to put out content on this an here you are 3 months ago educating. Thank you very much 👍
Stay tuned for my next video drop! Lots of fresh content impact 4000 footage headed your way!
This is what I’ve been searching for thank you! This channel inspired me to go head first into long range!
Really cool to hear you enjoyed the video and my content inspired you to get into long range! Long range shooting is epic but be warned it gets addicting and expensive haha
@@MountainsMulletsMerica lol I went full on with my first bolt, picked up an mrad and an atacr 7-35 looking at trying this 4000 out aswell
That's freaking awesome! That rifle is no joke either.. holy crap!
I appreciate the things you do for our education. Been watching for quite sometime now. Keep it up man!
Would love to see you review the Burris Eliminator 5 LaserScope, for those of us that just need a solution for a single long range rifle. 😬
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you for this awesome video. I love when I find YT videos that answer every question I have about a product. Great review!
Great review and demo of this awesome tool. Thank you for educating me and all your viewers. Merica!
RLTW!
You're on fire!! If it had IR like the Wilcox Raptar, it'll be a home run. But I know that would just make it more expensive.
Love your content, I agree the impact is awesome. Alot of them were on guns at major lands sniper cup, the winners had them.
I appreciate how thorough you are on all your videos, I have the Impact 4000 on my MRAD in 300 NM, I have not had a chance to get out with it yet, but you answered some questions I had. Thank you
That is some beautiful scenery in the background, great video! Had been considering this and your video was a huge help.
That scenery is something for sure.
Very impressive,I purchased one and your video explained some questions I had.
Best review I've seen. Vortex should pay you for your complete Instruction in the real world
Absolutely love watching these videos! Nothing beats watching long range and cleaning the hunting rifles!
Man it’s awesome to hear you’re enjoying the content! Thanks for the support!
WOW! So in depth and complete!
I could watch this channel ALL DAY
Awesome to hear you’re enjoying the content! I’ve got a lot of new videos in the works so hope you’ll stick around to check them out!
Best video
That I have seen on the range finder. I will be using this for long-range precision shooting for a big bore airgun known as the Airforce Texan LSS .50 with custom-made bullets looking to break the next big airgun shot in long range. Im looking forward to receiving it in the mail. Thank you for going into detail again. This is the best video on this range finder.
my go to channel for precision rifle gear review and content
Really awesome to hear your enjoying the content and finding value in watching! I’ve got a lot of new content coming so hope you’ll stay tuned to check it out and don’t forget to share with your buddies!
This dude needs to have 1M subscribers
Great video.
On the subject on the gear review type video:
Fantastic pacing. Didn’t go full reading a spec sheet and explained what bullets you were working with. Easily digestible shooting footage and my respect went up when you stated your misses.
If I was in the market for a range finder, this video would have sold me on one.
The vortex nation podcast gets douchey and Texas hunters podcast gets kinda rambling.
Looking forward to future content.
Appreciate your candid, pragmatic assessment and presentation. 👍
Excellent video as usual great information on an item I’m interested in. Viewer made a good point on the offset 3” offset will be about .1 mill (I think) at 1000yds, but you were spot on about using your 100 yard zero to range. Good job, hope to see more from you soon.😊
Props for the MRAD making another appearance! Always cool to see it stretched out.
One of my favorite long range rifles! Always fun to find an excuse to get it to the range!
Thanks!
By far the best instructional video on this device that I’ve seen.
Really cool to hear you enjoyed watching this one!
Man, I love this channel, but I'm sooo jealous of the land you have to shoot in. I'm lucky if I can get out to 300 yards in Western Wa. Keep up the good work, I've learned a lot from you.
Awesome review! Think it’s already been said but the reason for zeroing the laser .8 mils above the reticle at 100yds is so it maintains a consistent zero 3 inches above POA and that distance stays the same at all distances, only being .8mils at 100yds
Great work here, thank you from all of us
I’ll tell you what I’m thinking. I’m thinking I want to get into longer range stuff. I train with 556 up to 500 but mostly 200 and in and I’d like to get a nice longer range setup and would love to have some nice glass and one of these rangefinders. Cool seeing a company like Vortex applying pressure to some if they higher tier brands that are 5X’s the ticket of the Impact 4000. I think the Wilcox is unobtainable for most of us. This is a realistic option for a lot of shooters. The setup process on this thing is hilarious 😂 no big deal but just funny. You could’ve given me a million guesses on how to set this thing up and spinning and swinging it in the air in a figure eight motion wouldn’t have crossed my mind😂😂
Yeah that Vortex Warranty for a piece of kit like this is unbeatable. Plus it looks mean as hell.
As usual, concise, informative commentary.
Great shooting as usual. Id like to see you shoot some 300/338 norma with the mrad. I hope you got those calibers with the MRAD kit
I’ve got the 300nm barrel and actually launched a video earlier this year showing how it performed… check out the link below if you’re interested. Appreciate you taking the time to watch and support the channel!
300 Norma Mag in action….. The military’s new sniper round!
ruclips.net/video/6KnQCh4HcCU/видео.html
Dude, great review.... I've watched your summary multiple times trying to decide if it should go on my MRAD .338......
Oh man that’s an easy question….. yes haha
@@MountainsMulletsMerica OK, that's kind of what I thought. Where are you filming your videos? Montana?
@@StuPierce77I’ve filmed in several places, this one specifically was in eastern Wyoming. Most of the other videos are eastern WA state
Great Overview & Excellent shooting!!!
I live in a place where the tree line goes to the top of mountains. If I can find a place where i can see 1000yards straight, I cant see the splash. Very jealous of your landscape!
Yes, it will; excellent video, as always!
Favorite channel hands down!
Love, your videos !!’ You keep making and I’ll keep watching. Could the difference in how much you tightened the vortex have caused the non return to zero?
You know that’s a great point and something I didn’t even think about. Yes it’s very possible inconsistent torque is what lead to the poi shift. Might have to grab a torque wrench and try the poi shift test again sometime.
Great job giving us an overview of the Vortex Impact 4000!
For adjusting Windage, I believe the device can accept data inputs from a Kestrel via Bluetooth.
This is true but you need the app to transfer data from kestrel. Flow is like this Kestrel->App->Impact. Once data is on the Impact it will be retained and you can close the app until the next time you want to update it. I usually just read wind from the kestrel and manually input that wind on the Impact
You make shooting long range look so easy! Love the content!
Im curious what its limits are and what the beam divergence is. Im also interested to see a follow up video 5 or 6 months down the road to see what your thoughts are after time behind it.
I have no mountains, I have no mullet but I have plenty of ‘Merica! 🌲🇺🇸🌲
Funny how well your Content matches my needs I have a open box I just received Impact 4000 I could not pair my remote control but seems like you didn’t use one or the App thank you so much for your time sharing your experience much Respect Bill W.
If the light on the remote is blinking orange, which is easy to mistake as red in sunlight, you need to press and hold up/down on the remote to make it discoverable by other devices. It will blink red when it is discoverable. The remote can be added by the Impact directly if you don't want to use the app
Well done sir. Enjoyed the video and the content about the 4000. I’m still waiting for some of the pitfalls to show up before I actually buy one, but I’m sure interested in it. Keep up the good work sir.
I appreciate the approach you took to explain how you synced the range finder with mount to the optic. I also appreciate your transparency towards the end of the video where you include some of your misses. Just subbed, great work, look forward to the next vid.👍
Really cool to hear you enjoyed watching this one! Also I appreciate the sub, lots more content just like this in the works so hope you’ll stay tuned. On the topic of the misses… that’s part of the game. We’re not all sub moa all day shooters and none of us have 100% hit percentages so just out here trying to create content that gives viewers a look at reality for the average shooter.
Great stuff man. Really appreciate the attention to detail you bring into these videos. I can see that segment about return to zero being a very useful bit of information for serious buyers.
Great review! Thanks for all the details.
Waiting for the next model to come with LIDAR to detect wind speed down range instead of guessing or using local wind speeds measured with a Kestral anemometer
Please vortex. Do it.
Great video but your .8 low at distance ranging method is incorrect.
Nah, seemed to work perfectly and is exactly in line with what vortex does with their zero target
@@MountainsMulletsMericait is incorrect.
@@MountainsMulletsMerica the zero was good, but it was a parallel zero meaning the laser and the center of your dot are parallel forever. You were ranging on a diverging zero (.8mil at your gun vs ~3in at the target). It didn't hurt you because all your targets you shot were backstopped by large berms, so errors were small compared to your danger space.
Relative to other options (if they're even there), the Impact 4000 is indeed bangin' for the $1,999 price tag for what it does.
Also, thanks for the quality education and content. It's really helping me warm-up on my journey to longrange shooting for when I get there.
Hey you did great job shooting and making the video! Thanks
Awesome initial review
Now that I’ve got a bit over a year or so of experience with the impact 4000 I can confidently tell you this thing is awesome. My opinion it’s a must have piece of kit for the practical precision rifleman. Appreciate you taking the time to watch!
@@MountainsMulletsMerica
Your attentiveness to comments is impressive good sir.
I see you have been enjoying 14.5" 6.5 Creedmoor DMR set ups.
I would encourage you to get your hands on a Desert Tech WLVRN in 6.5 CM...20" barrel in a 7.5lb, shorter package. Accuracy reports seem to be excellent.
Just ordered mine today with Spuhr mounts for three rifles.
I like your style of reviews/ info videos
Thank you! Really awesome to hear you’re enjoying my content! Lots of new videos in the works so hope you’ll stay tuned to check them out.
Fantastic review. Great Shooting. I highly value your opinion.
Can you do a video with it side mounted I want to get one but want to see it side mounted not on top of the scope
I got their fury binoculars with applied ballistics so i can use it with multiple rifles without buying new mounts or setting it up every time i use a different rifle. If you have one dedicated lr rifle though being able to range right off your rifle is the way to go.
Ill wait for holosun to come out with their version half price and half the size lol
For zeroing, why not just adjust so the laser and line of site are parallel? A 3" vertical offset between the laser and the line of sight isn't going to do anything to the ballistic calculation
I've got mien in order. Great video as usually
I have the razor 4000 GB works great but on this one unless I’m wrong I don’t think it would serve my purposes if every time I’m going to use it on a different Rifle I have to zero the rangefinder to the new Rifle
That's an excellent point. I did not think about that. Switching could be a pain. But as shown, taking it off and reattaching to the same rifle could cause issues. But if you have one main long range rifle, this would be spot on. I have been looking hard at the 4000 GB myself. Bushnell was supposed to release the same type of rangefinder, with built in Ballistic data. But they cannot seem to figure out when or if to release. Probably too many issues. I use the Match Pro for NRL22 and wanted to stay with them. The 4000 GB is a little out of my price point at the moment.
@@rangerdanger126 well the razor 4000 GB has the same software Ballistics that’s in the 4000 impact. I have too many Rifles to be taking it off one putting it on a different one and having to rezero that’s too much of a hassle, the razor 4000 GB works great
Been playing with one for the last couple weeks. Had it out to 1300 so far. Used my kestrel data to build profiles. Onboard ballistics were spot on out to about 1100. Started to see some variances between AB and Geo past 1100. My intended purpose is team match and honestly will likely only use ranging with armboard and not ballistics. My 52 year old eyes have a little issue with the display in the ballistics mode. HCD display much better for me. They could probably offer some font options in firmware. Yes it’s big but sub $2k versus the alternatives will be a winner.
👍👍
Great video, appreciate your content ad usual!!
I wonder if you could fit a torque wrench on the nuts. You may get return to zero if precisely torquing the attachment nuts every time. Maybe one of the small fix it stick type tools to keep in the Barrett case.
I think this could very likely be the case. I just torqued the nuts using the included tool from vortex. Hard to say if I applied the same torque each time. Might have to re test poi shift with a torque wrench in a future video
A non bias comparison between their system and Sig's BDX would be interesting. I find that Vortex's system makes it big and clunky in the field. More likely to bump it on something.
Great video. Thanks for all of the information.
Glad you enjoyed this one! Lots more content just line this in the works so hope you’ll stay tuned to check it out!
1- you're pretty good.
2- that thing's impressive. Those first shot impacts are very nice.
3- probably not too far away from an AI scope that 'moves' the reticle for you. This is halfway there it seems.
I dig it. Definitely on my wishlist. I just have a hard time justifying this over a set of good range finding binos that aren’t slaved to a specific rifle.
Great video.How the price is dropping.Is because there are not selling.I do not see a lot of them on peoples gun at the club i go to?
I'm interesting in how it works with the wind. Diferent winds diferent distances.......
As per normal great information thank you!
Well if you remember you put in Windage for like 5mph left to right, and you were just ignoring the ballistics when shooting the first day. So maybe when you took it off, or before, you forgot 0 windsge? Then put it back on forgetting you had it set? Bc it’s was telling you 2-3 windage adjust but ignored them??
Really good stuff man!
great video brother.
Appreciate it! I had a blast putting this one together.
I want to learn how to find the ballistic coefficient of a shot, so I can enter the shot data?
The vast majority of bullet manufacturers will publish bc information for their bullets online. Should be able to google and find what you need.
Fine I'll start watching all your suff..... you got me
Haha love it! Appreciate you taking the time to watch and support the channel. Lots of fresh content in the works!
It says you should remove and recalibrate it every time you change locations by 30 miles. Seems kind of annoying on an otherwise solid unit.
Not sure if it would work but it would be nice to be able to save compass settings for a given location.
Yes it does say that…. For some reason mine now gives trouble with the calibration process so I just quit doing it. Hasn’t caused any issues so I’m not sure how necessary the re calibrations really are
@MountainsMulletsMerica good to know. I think I'm going to get one. Thanks for reviewing these.
I personally believe it is worth the $2k price tag if you can shoot long-range. I unfortunately don't have anywhere easily accessible to shoot long range. It looks like a lot of fun, and I would like to be able to try it sometime
Bro is literally reading my mind and reviewing the gear I want reviewed
Love it! Glad to hear you enjoyed this one!
Just freakin awesome review!!
Great review... love this channel.
Appreciate you taking the time to watch and support the channel! Help me out and share with your buddies when you can.
Thanks for another great video and showing us what looks to be a great tool. I'd love to hear your thoughts on how well the app works with the unit in practical use.
@MountainsMulletsMerica I would be interested to hear your take on this also. Generally, I like to use without the app because it is a standalone device. The app does have some added functionality and is easier to read and navigate compared to the device. Some notable functions specific to the app are: Using multi B.C bullets from the library, MV temp tables, sharing profiles and range cards via text/email, storing more than 10 profiles, pulling weather from airports or 3rd party devices, using Impact to drop pins on a map, exclude/include things like spin drift, aero jump and Coriolis in the ballistic calculation (app must be selected as the ballistic source for when connected to the Impact).
@@langy135 Thanks for all that info regarding the app!
Is the screen not illuminated for dark days? If that's the case, it's expensive for an absent option
Great review. Thank you
King review!
Thank you! Really awesome to hear you found value in watching!