1 stop DR loss for no LED flicker?! I’ll take it all day. Do you really think your client is going to notice a little noise more than rolling bands of black across the frame? Be fr.
As someone who shoots mostly action design/stunt work which incorporates a lot of dynamic camera movement and fast moving subjects; I would more than happily accept some low light/processor functionality for the elimination of rolling shutter. The a9 iii is one of the most exciting new cameras for those of us in the stunt industry.
Thanks for making this quick video. You answered the main question everyone has been wondering: how does global shutter effect dynamic range in the next generation of sony cameras? Luckily, it doesn't seem to take as big of hit as I thought it would, it just takes some extra steps to get there. Given this does seem like a photo first camera, I'm really excited to see how sony will implement Global Shutter in their videocentric products moving forward.
What I really want to see in a final review is how it stacks up against the Z8. Higher res, internal RAW, a mount with a lot of lenses that perform great for video, and 60% the cost for the body.
Love your camera reviews, they're probably the best on RUclips, detailed but concise. Thanks for the time and effort you put in them! And to answer your question, yeah I'd take the global shutter even if it's a bit noisier, either way it can be fixed during color correction.
He has already showed us what does noise reduction in post, a usual correction in photography when using raw files and also in camera processing jpeg images. Also DR from video does apply in photography from raw image (not easy to explain this comparison but is from Slog). So that is the quality of image from this A9III.
@@sadovski.pavel.photography I mentioned is not easy to understand being a more technical discussion : A hypothetical 10-bit linear raw image has substantially less color fidelity where it counts than an all-other-factors-being-equal 10-bit log image. Linear Raw vs logarithmic Log is the same but works better in log (again more technical discussion) The S-log (for Sony) is applied for RAW and only the compression H264-H265 has some flows in processing the image, so again don't mix senselessly14bit linear RAW with 10bit S-log 😉
It costs $6k, and for video is GS really worth it over the fast scanning sensor in a Z8 that also does 4K120 AND 8K60 with RAW internal recording for “only” $4k?
@@1armbiker It depends. If you're already shooting Sony, it will cost more than the $2000 difference to switch systems. Not to mention ajustments in workflow, ergonomics... If you don't have a camera (but who looks at a Z8 vs A9 III as their 1st camera) it is a consideration. And there are many more factors than the $2000 to take into account - lens choices and price, do you need/want 8k at all, do you need 120fps photos, do you need high-res photos, do you like the bulkier body or the smaller/lighter one... and surely there are more
@@houserhythm I doubt workflow is really all that different, especially if you use DaVinci Resolve's built in color space transforms. Lenses obviously matter.
@@1armbiker 14ms rolling shutter on the Z8 isn't fast... it's the annoying middle ground too many cameras fall into... jello is still there and it still restrict what you can do. Get to around 10ms and anywhere below and there you have a fast readout speed where the effects of the RS will be minimal.
More than anything, I'm excited to FINALLY see 1/48th and 1/96th shutter options! :D This could be them getting the nuts and bolts in place to provide the shutter angle option in a future firmware update? Recently I attended InterBEE (the Japanese NAB equivalent) with my Canon R5C and stopped by the Sony booth. I looked at the FX3, made a point of asking "where's the option for shutter angle" to the rep, and let them dig through the menus to find it (of course I knew it wasn't there). I then pointed out the R5C's simple shutter angle option and asked them to pass it up to management that we filmmakers NEED it! Who knows, maybe they listened?! Thanks for a great review digging into what we all want to know about the a9III and DR :) Happy new year!
Tell me, if you can figure out 1/48ss is the same as the 180deg shutter angle. Then why does it matter? It's like someone complaining they can't read kilometres vs miles. You just gotta learn and experience the speed to get accustomed to it for your needs
@@JericTamayoThe main reason for the shutter angle option is that when you switch to high speed framerates (for slomo) it automatically handles the adjustment so you always have a 180° shutter. The reason for wanting 1/48th specifically is to avoid light flicker.
@@visceralpsyche im sorry to say, but to compensate on light flickers, you'll need to adjust the angle anyway, so the 180deg rule isn't fixed set on that angle. And if you were a true cameraman, you'd adjust toe shutter speed accordingly to get the 180deg.
Those tests are irrational since they lack any sense of unification. Applying the same format, such as ProRes, and analyzing RAW signals are the best ways to evaluate cameras. Sony cameras have been so excellent at reducing noise and it's used to force better DR score. Because 12 stops is the limit of 12bit ADC, I think that all consumer cameras have roughly 11.5-12 stops of native DR without post processing. Depending on the resolution, every camera could receive a 1-2 stop boost with noise reduction. You can simply trick the Imatest by applying significant NR to an 8K file from an A1, oversampling it to a 4K, and still receiving a higher score than Alexa Mini.
As long as the dynamic range is actually there, I'm totally fine with doing my own noise reduction. Especially with the AI advancements Divinci and Topaz have had in the last year or so. I'll take the sharper more detailed image 9 times out of 10. Reminds me of how the fx6 to prores raw has worse noise performance than the fx3 because the fx6 raw doesnt have the same internal noise reduction algorithm that the fx3/a7siii does. So this is totally useable to me. Make the a9iii my new primary, and have the fx30 as a bcam and zv-e1 as a lowlight broll cam.
Would love the global shutter for flash photography. As an underwater photographer 90% of what I do is with strobes. Currently the a7iii is limited to 1/200th of a second. Being able to bring this up would be helpful for capturing fast moving critters.
That’s not too much of a hit for global shutter! The fact that I could bring it back with some noise reduction in Resolve makes me think it would be a great camera!
It's even more expensive than the a9iii and much less versatile, but I'm wondering how the Red Komodo-X fares in dynamic range compared to the a9iii. It also has a global sensor, similar video rates, and CineD hasn't done a xyla evaluation of it yet. In an area the size of Toronto, it should be easier to borrow one for a day.
@@spdcrzy Although it is not a global shutter sensor, CineD measured the Alexa 35 to have more than 15.3 stops and is also a Super35 sensor (although it barely more than 4K and consequently has a tiny bit larger pixel pitch than the a9iii - 6.075 micron for the arri vs 5.93 for the sony)
Thanks, I think that's the main thing everyone was curious about. Looking forward to the full review. Also, is Panasonic getting you a G9 II to review?
Thanks for all your work Gerald!. It would be awesome if you make a video comparing external recording pro res-raw on the Sony A7IV and A9III and observing the noise results and dynamic range comparisons!
Great review, Gerald! Would it be fair to say the iPhone 15 pro has a greater dynamic range than the A9, then? I know the A9 still beats the iPhone in everything else but stabilization.
I'd be interested in seeing direct comparisons of the video between the A9III and, say, the A1. Action sequences, lots of motion. Regular good ol' daylight, low light, bright light. I'm so invested in Sony glass, I have been waiting for Sony to come up with a global shutter camera. Thanks for your hard work...
Can you do some comparisons with the a1 if you plan to cover the a9iii again? I'm cross shopping those two cameras and would love a head to head with them.
Awesome video man! You answered every question I had about the dynamic range as well as confirmed some of my original thoughts. I shoot on the a7SIII and Alpha 1 and have/had no intention of ever switching to the A9 body. But, with Sony going to a global shutter on this camera they will surely make the switch to at least one of their more video centric cameras so it's definitely nice to keep up with the tech. With how low the rolling shutter is on both of my cameras as it sits I only see the global shutter as a marginal upgrade when it comes to video. However, the low light performance between my cameras vs the A9 III seems to still be where the gap is. Then again, we all know Sony will make it better over time so it's just another thing for me to get excited about in the future! Anyways I'm just waiting to see them fulfill their commitment to giving me my firmware updates they promised! Hahahaha even though I'm fairly certain my recording will be no different afterwards... it's just the follow through at this point!
9:25 Interesting! I wonder if the A9iii has less noise processing due to the higher speed nature of the imaging pipeline. Honestly it looks like the better image so I'd say at least at that ISO I'd prefer that.
Awesome Gerald, thanks for that, I'd love to grab an A9iii when it's ready for market. Just hearing how the battery lasted over two hours in 4K took me back to '96 in my TV college days, we used to have to wear very heavy battery belts to power our ENG cameras and the 3/4" tapes were the size of hard-cover books and were only capable of 20 minutes at the equivalent of 480p. Things are getting much better, cheers!
Two thoughts: 1. How computationally expensive is processing every image to reduce noise before writing to the card, as we suspect the A7IV, etc is doing? Is it enough that at 120 frames per second it’s a limitation? If so I can imagine a desire to keep lower frame rates consistent to avoid “reduced dynamic range” at higher frame rates. 2. AI image processing is progressing so rapidly that having a less processed raw file to start with, giving the AI the most info/ options to work with, seems a fundamental advantage over processing in camera, and one that will grow in time. I wonder if one or both of these impacted Sony’s thinking re internal processing? Great video as usual.
Looking at CineD's DR results, a9III's 11.5 DR (before NR in post) is still pretty good and on par with Nikon Z9 (in both 8K Nlog and 4K PRORES 422) and the FX6, and better than Canon's R3/R5/R6.
As always, it depends. If you're filming interviews and your camera's almost always on a tripod, A7IV for sure. If you're shooting moving subjects (especially hand held) I'd take the A9III.
The simplest thing to compare the noise in video - record the PRORES RAW from sony A9 III vs sony A7S III. after processing in say, premiere pro, you will get from both camera the noisy video, before any internal (in-camera) noise reduction applied.
I always prefer having the extra noise, as temporal noise reduction in Davinci Resolve is then able to extract more detail and dynamic range out of it. I'm assuming you used standard (spatial) noise reduction in your test there, not temporal one right?
At this point and for the price it should have 8K vertical resolution. So 62.5 MP like the Alpha 7R V! But I guess that will come later to "force" people to upgrade because it's always "a no brainer"!
I feel like this video interested you more than the norm, you seemed to perk up when talking about the "dual ISO" and the potential new nosie proicessing. Great video, as always
Well done Gerald. Thanks for the test and information. Really great to see the differences and comparison. I'm sure all the Sony and Global Shutter haters are still going to bit*h and complain about the A9iii. GS is here to stay and is the next advancement of camera tech. I'm excited and cannot wait for Sony's future cameras to all have GS. For everyone else, if you still love RS, then stick with it and stop complaining as well.
Nicely done! Thanks for using a A7 IV in the comparison, I feel that is a very common and affordable camera. Future ideas(for selfish reasons lol) Sony A7 IV in crop mode (4k 60 FPS) to the FX 30. Which is sharper & which has better dynamic range?
When evaluating if it's dual native ISO.. Doesn't the fact that we're scoring "usable stops" by how much noise there is at each stop, mean that the only thing you should be looking at is the total? Because the dual natives in BMPCC4K cameras, for example, are always a little noisier in the higher level.
hi man. tnx so much. a few questions. what's the dynamic range and NP when using extended ISOs? this is really important to know for video shooters cause I use them a lot and need to know the numbers. is there a difference when using APS-C mode in dynamic range in all the different ISOs? 500-2000 and also 6400 which has a half a stop more DR and cleaner shadows. Man even if you are not using this camera you are Gerald Undone and this a huge thing for videographers. get deep a little because we trust YOU and we need to know these things about this camera. do like you A7siii review or FX6 review. what's the color like compared to the FX line? AF is also important to us and ask some proffesionals to test the low light and give us the best settings for this camera to best reduce the noise in post using Davinci. I'm sorry man but you are the best and only one capable of answering these questions.
That trade-off is rather good if we get no banding. I mean we all knew we were getting less dynamic range and noisier image, but didn't expect it was that less of a difference. For a 1st-Gen Mirrorless Sensor of this caliber, Sony did a great job.
Thank you for the testing and general information on this new FF global shutter A9III, performance is quite good considering its first generation status.
Super impressive, and especially in light of recent advances in NR, seems like a win win for this global shutter. As it gets better can't wait to see it in every line!
At first my heart sank when it looked liked the global shutter was going to cost us a stop. But when you matched the denoise and suddenly the DR numbers matched, all hope returned. That little gem of an idea is why you’re the GOAT for this stuff! I’d love to point both cams at a sunset and see some real world highlights next!
Gerald, I have a stupid question about sensors. If it is a digital sensor, why would it ever have to “clip” on the high end? As the pixel receiving light nears 100% why not just return a smaller value? It would obviously give HDR vibes and look unnatural in certain circumstances but it seems like it could help in a lot of circumstances to just stop taking in light at some point… it is digital so it could be programmed to have an effectively shorter shutter speed per pixel. Im just curious
Hi there Gerald Undone community. I'm searching for a youtuber channel I used to watch back in the day which I cant remember the name. It was a guy and his wife and usually worked with a close friend who is an actor. They usually made fiction content, vlogs and filmed high quality material for stock footage webs. I remember they making BTS videos about a fiction space production.
Gerald, I'm sticking to my FX30 for film/video work, but interested in this camera for stills. Will you be doing a look into the A9 III still image output?
Would be intertaining to see the new improved Z-cam again on your show... they did all you asked for from last video. And a updated C70 with all the new updates that change the camera totally in all recording modes including the RAW Looking forward to see the new C500 mark 3 video from you soon 😎 waiting in my chair
I don't mind extra noise to eliminate rolling shutter completely, but at 1.5k increase in price from A9II, considering the higher price and worse image quality. I'm not so sure. Of course this camera is targeted at photographer instead of videographer but with all the video features and stuff, one cannot simply deny that this is not just a photographer's camera. Looking forward to see what Sony's does with the FX3 Mark II.
At this point in my life I’m a hybrid shooter for my day job. I own the original A9 and an FX3. I’ve wanted to upgrade the A9 to something that can match the SLOG3 and 10-bit color for a few reasons, but mainly so I can use the upgrade as a B cam when I’m shooting interviews in my freelance work. Despite the A7IV having an easier image out of camera, the photography aspects the body has at this current moment make it more attractive even at the price point. I do think I will no longer need a photo camera however in a few months. If that’s the case, I’ll more than likely end up with a second FX3 body
Deleting rolling shutter is worth it. Im buying the moment it arrives at my country. Thanks for the video. Would be nice to see if it overheats in "webcam" mode while recording
It's the price you pay for parallelization. you've got MILLIONS of routes for information to pass. Definitely likely that way more will be iffy (noisy). It's a really cool function that has a LOT of improvement to show. Im excited about 2-3 cameras down the line that implement a more efficient data correction algorithm, then feeds that into some sort of kalman filter to make predictions on the right shade/hue for the pixel. but then again, im just ranting. Thanks!
I would love to see a real world rolling shutter video comparison video. ie not a whip pan or footage of a fan. Some real world examples could be recording video from a vehicle bouncing over rough pavement, or maybe some sports video? What difference does rolling shutter make to a vlogger, run n gun solo documentary shooter, short film camera?
Agreed. It would be cool to see real world comparisons between a regular/slow read sensor, a fast stacked sensor, and this sensor. I currently shoot highschool sports video with a fast read stacked sensor, and I can't say that rolling shutter is ever evident in the footage. But I am not prone to do any whip-pans.
A full stop difference in actual use is fairly significant for certain uses (like landscape, or low light event shooting). The tech seems like it's almost there, maybe another iteration or two.
Beautiful video as always! Question! 🙋🏽♂️ so we are compromising, dynamic range, and more noisier image with the color shift at higher ISO? For a global shutter? Also, I do recognize this is the first attempt at global shutter, so Sony’s not going to get it perfect like red. However, I think as a video first type of guy I think my FX6 and A7rV is just good of a combo! I don’t know I was really thinking about pulling the trigger on this one for photos but it seems like the A1 still is the better all overall hybrid camera
Great video review as always! Looks like the DR will be good enough for who will need to eliminate rolling shutter. For its maximum shooting speed though, will it max out the buffer quick in the product version?
That intro comment was very original and surprisingly funny
That’s exactly what I was thinking
Ya quite impressed 👏
It really wasn’t though.
Kudos to whoever came up with that
Thank you!
1 stop DR loss for no LED flicker?! I’ll take it all day. Do you really think your client is going to notice a little noise more than rolling bands of black across the frame? Be fr.
Your tests and reviews are SO good. I can't quantify how much I've learned from you over the last few years.
Everytime a video from Gerald drops I leave everything to watch it
As someone who shoots mostly action design/stunt work which incorporates a lot of dynamic camera movement and fast moving subjects; I would more than happily accept some low light/processor functionality for the elimination of rolling shutter. The a9 iii is one of the most exciting new cameras for those of us in the stunt industry.
Thanks for making this quick video. You answered the main question everyone has been wondering: how does global shutter effect dynamic range in the next generation of sony cameras? Luckily, it doesn't seem to take as big of hit as I thought it would, it just takes some extra steps to get there. Given this does seem like a photo first camera, I'm really excited to see how sony will implement Global Shutter in their videocentric products moving forward.
@@GrenlandUnderVann daily life of a paraplegic unicyclist in NYC vlogging Alexa 35 setup video coming soon
same
@@GrenlandUnderVannFor action photography? 😅
What I really want to see in a final review is how it stacks up against the Z8. Higher res, internal RAW, a mount with a lot of lenses that perform great for video, and 60% the cost for the body.
Love your camera reviews, they're probably the best on RUclips, detailed but concise. Thanks for the time and effort you put in them! And to answer your question, yeah I'd take the global shutter even if it's a bit noisier, either way it can be fixed during color correction.
Please make DR and Hi ISO Noise tests in RAW photo mode in comparison with other Sony cameras you have on hands.
He has already showed us what does noise reduction in post, a usual correction in photography when using raw files and also in camera processing jpeg images. Also DR from video does apply in photography from raw image (not easy to explain this comparison but is from Slog). So that is the quality of image from this A9III.
@@CSMoviePhoto he showed it in video Slog-3 files, not RAW photo files - it is very big difference. Slog-3 has 10 bit depth, RAW photo - 14 bit.
@@sadovski.pavel.photography14 bit is for colour. Luma values won't change much
@@sadovski.pavel.photography I mentioned is not easy to understand being a more technical discussion : A hypothetical 10-bit linear raw image has substantially less color fidelity where it counts than an all-other-factors-being-equal 10-bit log image. Linear Raw vs logarithmic Log is the same but works better in log (again more technical discussion) The S-log (for Sony) is applied for RAW and only the compression H264-H265 has some flows in processing the image, so again don't mix senselessly14bit linear RAW with 10bit S-log 😉
You are the main reason these camera companies are pushing for the best. There’s no way for me to find these test results on my own.
We all knew the global shutter came at a cost but I am surprised how minimal that cost really was. Looks like a great camera.
It costs $6k, and for video is GS really worth it over the fast scanning sensor in a Z8 that also does 4K120 AND 8K60 with RAW internal recording for “only” $4k?
@@1armbiker It depends. If you're already shooting Sony, it will cost more than the $2000 difference to switch systems. Not to mention ajustments in workflow, ergonomics...
If you don't have a camera (but who looks at a Z8 vs A9 III as their 1st camera) it is a consideration. And there are many more factors than the $2000 to take into account - lens choices and price, do you need/want 8k at all, do you need 120fps photos, do you need high-res photos, do you like the bulkier body or the smaller/lighter one... and surely there are more
@@houserhythm I doubt workflow is really all that different, especially if you use DaVinci Resolve's built in color space transforms. Lenses obviously matter.
@@1armbiker I think OP meant cost to image quality, not talking about monetary cost.
@@1armbiker 14ms rolling shutter on the Z8 isn't fast... it's the annoying middle ground too many cameras fall into... jello is still there and it still restrict what you can do. Get to around 10ms and anywhere below and there you have a fast readout speed where the effects of the RS will be minimal.
These videos GU puts out are mind bending, so easy to watch, so informative and concise. Protect this man at all costs.
More than anything, I'm excited to FINALLY see 1/48th and 1/96th shutter options! :D This could be them getting the nuts and bolts in place to provide the shutter angle option in a future firmware update? Recently I attended InterBEE (the Japanese NAB equivalent) with my Canon R5C and stopped by the Sony booth. I looked at the FX3, made a point of asking "where's the option for shutter angle" to the rep, and let them dig through the menus to find it (of course I knew it wasn't there). I then pointed out the R5C's simple shutter angle option and asked them to pass it up to management that we filmmakers NEED it! Who knows, maybe they listened?! Thanks for a great review digging into what we all want to know about the a9III and DR :) Happy new year!
Sony cameras and major firmware updates is a good joke. But who knows, maybe they'll have a realisation at some point
Tell me, if you can figure out 1/48ss is the same as the 180deg shutter angle. Then why does it matter? It's like someone complaining they can't read kilometres vs miles. You just gotta learn and experience the speed to get accustomed to it for your needs
Even using 1/50ss is basically identical to using 180deg angle. Those 2 shutter speed over the 180deg is negligible for 95% of scenarios
@@JericTamayoThe main reason for the shutter angle option is that when you switch to high speed framerates (for slomo) it automatically handles the adjustment so you always have a 180° shutter. The reason for wanting 1/48th specifically is to avoid light flicker.
@@visceralpsyche im sorry to say, but to compensate on light flickers, you'll need to adjust the angle anyway, so the 180deg rule isn't fixed set on that angle. And if you were a true cameraman, you'd adjust toe shutter speed accordingly to get the 180deg.
Hey Gerald! Why don't you ever test RED Digital cinema cameras? I would love to see your take on the Komodo and Komodo X
Those tests are irrational since they lack any sense of unification. Applying the same format, such as ProRes, and analyzing RAW signals are the best ways to evaluate cameras. Sony cameras have been so excellent at reducing noise and it's used to force better DR score.
Because 12 stops is the limit of 12bit ADC, I think that all consumer cameras have roughly 11.5-12 stops of native DR without post processing.
Depending on the resolution, every camera could receive a 1-2 stop boost with noise reduction.
You can simply trick the Imatest by applying significant NR to an 8K file from an A1, oversampling it to a 4K, and still receiving a higher score than Alexa Mini.
As long as the dynamic range is actually there, I'm totally fine with doing my own noise reduction. Especially with the AI advancements Divinci and Topaz have had in the last year or so. I'll take the sharper more detailed image 9 times out of 10. Reminds me of how the fx6 to prores raw has worse noise performance than the fx3 because the fx6 raw doesnt have the same internal noise reduction algorithm that the fx3/a7siii does. So this is totally useable to me. Make the a9iii my new primary, and have the fx30 as a bcam and zv-e1 as a lowlight broll cam.
been neatvideoing noise from cameras since 2010. Let's go Global :)
Being that this is a first-gen sensor package, that is DAMN impressive.
Would love the global shutter for flash photography. As an underwater photographer 90% of what I do is with strobes. Currently the a7iii is limited to 1/200th of a second. Being able to bring this up would be helpful for capturing fast moving critters.
Please Gerald, do a indepht test of the Lumix G9II .. no one in the internet tested the new Sensor like you do!
Something interesting and new i found in the Help guide is "Focus/Zoom preset".
Really looking forward to your future a9III content!
@Gerald Undone please compare the dynamic range with RED V-Raptor X that just came out with global shutter.
The audio is so good it bipasses the hear drum and is injected in the brain directly😊
I've been looking forward to this test for a long time! Very interesting results (and new outro)!
That’s not too much of a hit for global shutter! The fact that I could bring it back with some noise reduction in Resolve makes me think it would be a great camera!
It's even more expensive than the a9iii and much less versatile, but I'm wondering how the Red Komodo-X fares in dynamic range compared to the a9iii. It also has a global sensor, similar video rates, and CineD hasn't done a xyla evaluation of it yet. In an area the size of Toronto, it should be easier to borrow one for a day.
The Komodo-X is a Super35 sensor though, not full frame.
@@spdcrzy Although it is not a global shutter sensor, CineD measured the Alexa 35 to have more than 15.3 stops and is also a Super35 sensor (although it barely more than 4K and consequently has a tiny bit larger pixel pitch than the a9iii - 6.075 micron for the arri vs 5.93 for the sony)
@@KeithSklower the Komodo-X and the Alexa 35 aren't even on the same playing field lol.
A tip, get Padcaster Josh Apter in your studio clearing up things! Wildfire at the kickstarter campain
lol, I don't think that's going to happen at this rate.
finally , I been waiting this video for so freaking long
Thanks, I think that's the main thing everyone was curious about. Looking forward to the full review. Also, is Panasonic getting you a G9 II to review?
Can't wait to see you do the Burano!
Thanks for all your work Gerald!. It would be awesome if you make a video comparing external recording pro res-raw on the Sony A7IV and A9III and observing the noise results and dynamic range comparisons!
i believe the A7IV does not support Raw video output
@@kysus3284 it doesn't unfortunately, I own one
Great review, Gerald! Would it be fair to say the iPhone 15 pro has a greater dynamic range than the A9, then? I know the A9 still beats the iPhone in everything else but stabilization.
I'd be interested in seeing direct comparisons of the video between the A9III and, say, the A1. Action sequences, lots of motion. Regular good ol' daylight, low light, bright light.
I'm so invested in Sony glass, I have been waiting for Sony to come up with a global shutter camera. Thanks for your hard work...
To think the 45.7mp Z8/Z9 sensor gets 15.5 stops in DR but as you pointed out it has 12.5 stops DR in usable footage. Hats off to Nikon.
Can you do some comparisons with the a1 if you plan to cover the a9iii again? I'm cross shopping those two cameras and would love a head to head with them.
Awesome video man! You answered every question I had about the dynamic range as well as confirmed some of my original thoughts. I shoot on the a7SIII and Alpha 1 and have/had no intention of ever switching to the A9 body. But, with Sony going to a global shutter on this camera they will surely make the switch to at least one of their more video centric cameras so it's definitely nice to keep up with the tech. With how low the rolling shutter is on both of my cameras as it sits I only see the global shutter as a marginal upgrade when it comes to video. However, the low light performance between my cameras vs the A9 III seems to still be where the gap is. Then again, we all know Sony will make it better over time so it's just another thing for me to get excited about in the future! Anyways I'm just waiting to see them fulfill their commitment to giving me my firmware updates they promised! Hahahaha even though I'm fairly certain my recording will be no different afterwards... it's just the follow through at this point!
Thanks Gerald.
can you test it for photography?
For video and hybrid shooting, the Lumix S5 ii/iix, A7 IV are still the best option within their price range in the full-frame category.
DUUUUUUUDE I have been waiting for this!!!!!!!! Let’s goooooo
9:25 Interesting! I wonder if the A9iii has less noise processing due to the higher speed nature of the imaging pipeline. Honestly it looks like the better image so I'd say at least at that ISO I'd prefer that.
Awesome Gerald, thanks for that, I'd love to grab an A9iii when it's ready for market. Just hearing how the battery lasted over two hours in 4K took me back to '96 in my TV college days, we used to have to wear very heavy battery belts to power our ENG cameras and the 3/4" tapes were the size of hard-cover books and were only capable of 20 minutes at the equivalent of 480p. Things are getting much better, cheers!
Sick looking camera.
Two thoughts:
1. How computationally expensive is processing every image to reduce noise before writing to the card, as we suspect the A7IV, etc is doing? Is it enough that at 120 frames per second it’s a limitation? If so I can imagine a desire to keep lower frame rates consistent to avoid “reduced dynamic range” at higher frame rates.
2. AI image processing is progressing so rapidly that having a less processed raw file to start with, giving the AI the most info/ options to work with, seems a fundamental advantage over processing in camera, and one that will grow in time.
I wonder if one or both of these impacted Sony’s thinking re internal processing?
Great video as usual.
Looking at CineD's DR results, a9III's 11.5 DR (before NR in post) is still pretty good and on par with Nikon Z9 (in both 8K Nlog and 4K PRORES 422) and the FX6, and better than Canon's R3/R5/R6.
top tier insights on gear, thanks Gerald!
Are you doing a full review of the camera? I'm dying to preorder it.
As always, it depends. If you're filming interviews and your camera's almost always on a tripod, A7IV for sure. If you're shooting moving subjects (especially hand held) I'd take the A9III.
The simplest thing to compare the noise in video - record the PRORES RAW from sony A9 III vs sony A7S III. after processing in say, premiere pro, you will get from both camera the noisy video, before any internal (in-camera) noise reduction applied.
I always prefer having the extra noise, as temporal noise reduction in Davinci Resolve is then able to extract more detail and dynamic range out of it.
I'm assuming you used standard (spatial) noise reduction in your test there, not temporal one right?
Excellent review, that answered some important questions. Seems the noise / DR penalty isn't as bad as feared.
8:25 "Yes Extra NR" 😆
- NR?
- Yas, gurl!
"I'm Gerald Undone, and I prefer my cameras shaken not stirred"
Sony A1 II - Can't wait 📸
At this point and for the price it should have 8K vertical resolution. So 62.5 MP like the Alpha 7R V!
But I guess that will come later to "force" people to upgrade because it's always "a no brainer"!
I feel like this video interested you more than the norm, you seemed to perk up when talking about the "dual ISO" and the potential new nosie proicessing.
Great video, as always
Well done Gerald. Thanks for the test and information. Really great to see the differences and comparison. I'm sure all the Sony and Global Shutter haters are still going to bit*h and complain about the A9iii. GS is here to stay and is the next advancement of camera tech. I'm excited and cannot wait for Sony's future cameras to all have GS. For everyone else, if you still love RS, then stick with it and stop complaining as well.
Um Gerald gotta say really nice desk!!! good aesthetics there!!
Happy New Year, Gerald. Just wondering if purchasing this instead of the Canon R5C or Sony alpha1.
That's probably my favorite intro quote
Nicely done! Thanks for using a A7 IV in the comparison, I feel that is a very common and affordable camera.
Future ideas(for selfish reasons lol) Sony A7 IV in crop mode (4k 60 FPS) to the FX 30. Which is sharper & which has better dynamic range?
When evaluating if it's dual native ISO..
Doesn't the fact that we're scoring "usable stops" by how much noise there is at each stop, mean that the only thing you should be looking at is the total?
Because the dual natives in BMPCC4K cameras, for example, are always a little noisier in the higher level.
hi man. tnx so much. a few questions.
what's the dynamic range and NP when using extended ISOs? this is really important to know for video shooters cause I use them a lot and need to know the numbers. is there a difference when using APS-C mode in dynamic range in all the different ISOs? 500-2000 and also 6400 which has a half a stop more DR and cleaner shadows. Man even if you are not using this camera you are Gerald Undone and this a huge thing for videographers. get deep a little because we trust YOU and we need to know these things about this camera. do like you A7siii review or FX6 review. what's the color like compared to the FX line? AF is also important to us and ask some proffesionals to test the low light and give us the best settings for this camera to best reduce the noise in post using Davinci. I'm sorry man but you are the best and only one capable of answering these questions.
That trade-off is rather good if we get no banding. I mean we all knew we were getting less dynamic range and noisier image, but didn't expect it was that less of a difference.
For a 1st-Gen Mirrorless Sensor of this caliber, Sony did a great job.
Thank you for the testing and general information on this new FF global shutter A9III, performance is quite good considering its first generation status.
I’ve been waiting for this!
I really appreciate the work you do I've been bouncing back and forth between either getting the Sony FX3 the a93 or just getting a second a74
Always the best!
Been waiting for this one.
Super impressive, and especially in light of recent advances in NR, seems like a win win for this global shutter. As it gets better can't wait to see it in every line!
Very informative sir thank you. Please make detailed review upon the Nikon Zf too.
At first my heart sank when it looked liked the global shutter was going to cost us a stop. But when you matched the denoise and suddenly the DR numbers matched, all hope returned. That little gem of an idea is why you’re the GOAT for this stuff! I’d love to point both cams at a sunset and see some real world highlights next!
It will cost at least that one stop. There is no way around that
Dope video as always, Gerald. Thanks!
Noise is manageable. Rolling shutter is annoying to work around.
Gerald, I have a stupid question about sensors. If it is a digital sensor, why would it ever have to “clip” on the high end? As the pixel receiving light nears 100% why not just return a smaller value? It would obviously give HDR vibes and look unnatural in certain circumstances but it seems like it could help in a lot of circumstances to just stop taking in light at some point… it is digital so it could be programmed to have an effectively shorter shutter speed per pixel.
Im just curious
Hi there Gerald Undone community. I'm searching for a youtuber channel I used to watch back in the day which I cant remember the name. It was a guy and his wife and usually worked with a close friend who is an actor. They usually made fiction content, vlogs and filmed high quality material for stock footage webs. I remember they making BTS videos about a fiction space production.
Gerald you are the best!
Gerald, I'm sticking to my FX30 for film/video work, but interested in this camera for stills. Will you be doing a look into the A9 III still image output?
Would be intertaining to see the new improved Z-cam again on your show... they did all you asked for from last video.
And a updated C70 with all the new updates that change the camera totally in all recording modes including the RAW
Looking forward to see the new C500 mark 3 video from you soon 😎 waiting in my chair
I don't mind extra noise to eliminate rolling shutter completely, but at 1.5k increase in price from A9II, considering the higher price and worse image quality. I'm not so sure. Of course this camera is targeted at photographer instead of videographer but with all the video features and stuff, one cannot simply deny that this is not just a photographer's camera. Looking forward to see what Sony's does with the FX3 Mark II.
is a detailed review still coming? id appreciate it! thank you!
informative video Thanks.
At this point in my life I’m a hybrid shooter for my day job. I own the original A9 and an FX3. I’ve wanted to upgrade the A9 to something that can match the SLOG3 and 10-bit color for a few reasons, but mainly so I can use the upgrade as a B cam when I’m shooting interviews in my freelance work. Despite the A7IV having an easier image out of camera, the photography aspects the body has at this current moment make it more attractive even at the price point.
I do think I will no longer need a photo camera however in a few months. If that’s the case, I’ll more than likely end up with a second FX3 body
Deleting rolling shutter is worth it. Im buying the moment it arrives at my country. Thanks for the video. Would be nice to see if it overheats in "webcam" mode while recording
Excellent video! Thanks Gerald. The compression artifacts on the purple background on this video in 4k seem worse than usual 0.o
Another great review, thanks! Can you test out composite raw shooting?
It's the price you pay for parallelization. you've got MILLIONS of routes for information to pass. Definitely likely that way more will be iffy (noisy). It's a really cool function that has a LOT of improvement to show. Im excited about 2-3 cameras down the line that implement a more efficient data correction algorithm, then feeds that into some sort of kalman filter to make predictions on the right shade/hue for the pixel. but then again, im just ranting. Thanks!
that battery life is impressive!
I mainly do video on the a1. Was considering switching to a93 because of the global shutter. Thoughts or advice?
I would love to see a real world rolling shutter video comparison video. ie not a whip pan or footage of a fan. Some real world examples could be recording video from a vehicle bouncing over rough pavement, or maybe some sports video? What difference does rolling shutter make to a vlogger, run n gun solo documentary shooter, short film camera?
Agreed. It would be cool to see real world comparisons between a regular/slow read sensor, a fast stacked sensor, and this sensor. I currently shoot highschool sports video with a fast read stacked sensor, and I can't say that rolling shutter is ever evident in the footage. But I am not prone to do any whip-pans.
Wondering if the A1mk2 will build upon this with a higher MP sensor and less noise.
Nice video. Also which rock have been living under. I feel like the last time i saw a sony review the a7r4 was a thing?
There are camera and lens reviewers, and then there is Gerald Undone.
A full stop difference in actual use is fairly significant for certain uses (like landscape, or low light event shooting). The tech seems like it's almost there, maybe another iteration or two.
What we been waiting for..
great review as always. actually, for me the resulting image after Resolve denoise process seemed better.
Beautiful video as always!
Question! 🙋🏽♂️ so we are compromising, dynamic range, and more noisier image with the color shift at higher ISO? For a global shutter?
Also, I do recognize this is the first attempt at global shutter, so Sony’s not going to get it perfect like red. However, I think as a video first type of guy I think my FX6 and A7rV is just good of a combo!
I don’t know I was really thinking about pulling the trigger on this one for photos but it seems like the A1 still is the better all overall hybrid camera
I wonder how long it takes before we get h265 30 frames per second? What do you think is stopping Sony doing this?
Build quality is mouthwatering tbh
Do you think they can get more stops out of the sensor in a potential successor of the FX3?
Maybe we‘ll get control over NR in camera
Great video review as always! Looks like the DR will be good enough for who will need to eliminate rolling shutter. For its maximum shooting speed though, will it max out the buffer quick in the product version?