I think mustang and Chevy and closer to sports cars now a days, being able to kill it on the track. With dodge being the only one truly sticking to muscle.
CAMARO _KYLE I do classify all 3 more muscle than a Vette, that’s a sports car. And you need to be very stupid to call a Viper a muscle car as it has a V10.
Smh at people spending $40k on 4 cylinder engines... 4cyl are a great AFFORDABLE option but in no universe is it worth spending $40k on one when you can get the V8 variants for the same price. Give up a few features, and you can get a 1SS Camaro for $36k... If you have to have the comfort features, get the 2SS for $41k. Not sure why KBB tested such strange configurations...
2SS is $51,000 though.. That's literally what I paid for my 2017 2SS.. Dealers ain't gonna sell them for what they pay! I agree with your main point though. V8 or nothing!
@@geopioneergsxr5357 Whattt for real?? I got my 1ss 1le for $38.5k whereas they normally cost $45k! I just bought it though so maybe timing has something to do with it? They aren't selling a ton of Camaros so I think the dealers are starting to come down on pricing.
@Rique Yup, there's plenty of great deals to be had with Camaros. I personally preferred the performance upgrades of the 1ss 1le over the comfort features of the 2ss. I did take a look at used 5th gen ZL1s but they're all in the $50k range :/
first of all no car now day is truly what a muscle car was back then, when I think of a muscle car, it’s a horse drawn carriage but the horse is a 8L hunk of metal with no stability or traction, moving to smaller displacement is part of time, sorry but if this is what muscle cars are now day
max sebion I suppose you’re saying that for nostalgic reasons, they were definitely amazing cars however you said with time comes smaller displacement, no muscle car back then could dream of coming stock from the factory with 700 horsepower
Reagan North yeah I get it but there’s certainly one 5.0 mustang u can get for 38k or add the GT PERFORMANCE package for 41k. They were certainly some bias here for the challenger!!
Mild to low optioned v8 and 2 fully optioned 4 bangers.? That's not a comparison. I say compare the stock trims on all the v8 models with no options. That's what I was hoping for this video 😓
This is why I love KBB, they give me straight facts and talk strictly performance while keeping it fair. They dont whine about looks or complain about which one is more comfortable than the others , a damn fine review about 3 modern day American classics.
Can't compare performance with 1 v8 and two 4 bangers. Only thing fair was the price tag nothing else . Was hoping they'd compare all V8s stock trim no options.. That would have been a fair comparison .
@@scarface9617 agreed if they they were going for that 40kish price tag they could up the hemi to the 6.4 then they'd all be fair power wise . Otherwise 5.7 weakest out of the V8s .. I've test driven all the current model years .. I want to own them all ha
@@scarface9617 um... If they were NA 4 bangers then I agree with you.. but these are boosted with turbos.. and Chevy and Ford certainly feel that this is competitive with Dodge 5.7 Hemi.. they priced the 4 bangers the same as Dodge with V8
@@dhruv7759 Stock or straight off the dealers lot, yes. But anyone with experience or some mechanical knowledge knows they neutered the performance numbers of the V6 to sell the eco boost. All one has to do is spend about 2k dollars to bring the V6 up to par. Plus the V6 has way more performance potential , more reliability, and is built to last longer. list of the basic upgrades: intake: CAI K&N $250 engine ECU: SCT X4 tuner with 3 MPT Tune bundle $450 ( eco 87 tune for 32 mpg hwy daily driving, 87 sport tune, & 93 performance tune) engine: BBK Ceramic Shorty Headers $430 (went with the $100 more expensive ones for better heat management) exhaust: MagnaFlow Catback exhaust $1100 (any cat-back will do for better air flow, just pick one with an X pipe and the sound you like) total: $2,230 add $200 more for a mechanic to install the headers and exhaust. This setup will shave almost a second off on quarter mile times to 13 seconds. Need to spend another 2 grand in upgrades to shave off another second and it will beat a stock V8 stang.
This from a Generic Motor Crap plastic two seater fanboi? What? You pissy you’re crapvette still can cut the times of a demon at damn near 1/2 the weight?
If it was 2010, I'd have a hard time deciding between the Mustang, Camaro, or Challenger. But nowadays with the current models, I think I would just pick the Challenger.
I think they went for the cheapest performance spec of each model. A Camaro 1LE, eco boost PP, and challenger with the super trac pack. If you were to bump up to 1ss and GT, then it would only be fair to bump up the challenger to a scat pack. Then that becomes more of a performance test than a “all around inexpensive functional American performance car” test
The challenger weighs more than most compact SUVs. Absolutely ridiculous. I’ve beaten v6 challengers with my 2003 Mustang GT before. Challengers are too heavy. Get the Hemi if you must.
I've driven the 4-cylinder Mustang and Dodge Challenger R/T. They're both incredibly fun! I like the Challenger more, but I can see why some would prefer the Mustang. I can't speak for the Camaro yet :(
@@tenhundredkills I love the sound, rumble and feel of a V8. All of the newer 4 & 6 cylinder engine (and the technologies behind them) come very close and even surpass some of these V8's (including mine). Exciting times for the consumer.
Yeah it is 2019 Crust Chevrolet Camaro 3LT 2.0L 4-CYLINDER 42,585 275 Hp and 295 Torque $31.000 Vs 2019 Indigo Blue Dodge Challenger R/T 5.7L V8 375 Hp 410 Torque $39,970 Vs 2019 OxFord White Ford Mustang 2.3L 4-CYLINDER 320 Hp 358 Torque $38.980 Ultimate Compact Muscle Cars!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Challenger is clearly cooking up thee most American recipe here and would be the one I'd buy too even though I'm totally down with tunability and capability of a turbo 4.
I like muscles cars but then I find 4 cylinder cars such as STIs, evos, focus RS beating them. That's when I realize muscles cars don't have such "muscles"🤦♂️
That Camaro doesn’t look so good. I get muscle, but I wish they cut the weight down/get it more lean with the Challenger and keep the length. Edit: I mean the Challenger getting lean. The Camaro is certainly much leaner considering how they removed a lot of weight since last gen.
Did I hear that right? Get the Camaro more lean? The Camaro weighs almost 600 lbs less and that's with the Challenger's v6. If we are talking about the ones one's in this review. You are looking at over 600 lbs difference. V8 for v8, it's almost a 500 lbs difference. I would like to make it longer for more interior room. But as it stands it's probably the lightest of the being compared in this review. Granted with all the options that it has. It might weigh more than the mustang.
Most likely. I'm 5'9", and I do fit in the back of my Mustang GT, but I have to slouch a bit, or tilt my head. I had taller friends test drive. You might have to juggle leg room a bit.
I'll make it easy. Buy the Mustang. The 5.0 is great, and you can do a lot of stuff to them and make them a fun daily. Camaro? I'm 5ft 6in, and I feel cramped sitting inside one. It's bigger than the Mustang but smaller on the inside!!!? 🤔 Challenger? The 5.7 Hemi has no power, and the car weighs as much as a semi truck. Unless you get one with at least the 392 6.4 Hemi....dont bother.
The v6 Camaro will lose to the mustang with the 10 speed automatic. Mustang has better power weight ratio and has more power. Around a track it will win because it's the 1le version.
@@cubanamerican22 yes. Automatics are faster usually in a drag race especially if it's a automatic dual transmission. The mustang doesn't have dual clutch automatic tho. It has a torque converter automatic transmission. Dual clutch automatics are usually quicker than automatic torque converter but not always. The 2017 Camaro Zl1 with the 10 speed automatic transmission shifts faster than the porsche's PDK dual clutch.
Ecoboost is getting a high performance added later this year that gives it 330 hp with a mid 4 sec 0-60. And under 30k, I think I'll wait to see if that's worth it before jumping on one. I was moving towards Challenger but damn is that Ecoboost a good buy
Josh Davis as a owner of 2019 EcoBoost you won’t be disappointed. Although my car doesn’t sound like a v8 it’s definitely got plenty of hp and Torque. My best 0-60 so far is 5.4 seconds.
The challenger has the nicest interior, the Ford is old and cheaply made with blocks for buttons. The Chevy is as nice but it's got GM plastics. The challenger is more of a baser with still metal and soft touch materials everywhere.
$40K for a 4 cylinder? lol, I'll get a Type R, WRX or Golf R for that price without the laughable GM build quality Edit: i have some experience with Chevy. I love the LS motor but my mom was the first owner of a 2014 Malibu for less than 20,000 miles before bailing for her second Highlander. The thing was so cheap for a modern car
If im going spend 39k on EcoBoost Mustang, Id rather pay 37k for a basic 5.0 GT...
460hp? Yes please!
Garbage...actually you can find brand new EcoBoost base model for $19000 on Georgia. Use autotrader
Resilient ong
That’s only if people have bad credit and don’t know how to negotiate.
I got a 2019 Mustang GT premium for 36k at 0% APR
They aren’t 39k these are price as tested without negotiation in the dealers probably can knock it down to 32ish
I don't care if it doesn't handle as well, I'll take a cheaper v8 over an overpriced 4 banger anyday.
ShoryukenDatAzz definitely
ShoryukenDatAzz the 5.0 GT mustang costs 38k but these 4 bangers had all the bells and whistles
I think mustang and Chevy and closer to sports cars now a days, being able to kill it on the track. With dodge being the only one truly sticking to muscle.
Yeah no. Dodge has awd
CAMARO _KYLE only on one trim level. And there are people far north with lots of snow who at least want a Challenger, though it’s only a V6.
@@Stagnant_Gravy well yes but you cant use the fact camaros and mustangs can turn and sag ut ain't muscle. That isnt true
CAMARO _KYLE I do classify all 3 more muscle than a Vette, that’s a sports car. And you need to be very stupid to call a Viper a muscle car as it has a V10.
@@Stagnant_Gravy well the vette isnt muscle in the first place
Smh at people spending $40k on 4 cylinder engines... 4cyl are a great AFFORDABLE option but in no universe is it worth spending $40k on one when you can get the V8 variants for the same price.
Give up a few features, and you can get a 1SS Camaro for $36k... If you have to have the comfort features, get the 2SS for $41k. Not sure why KBB tested such strange configurations...
2SS is $51,000 though.. That's literally what I paid for my 2017 2SS.. Dealers ain't gonna sell them for what they pay! I agree with your main point though. V8 or nothing!
@@geopioneergsxr5357
Whattt for real?? I got my 1ss 1le for $38.5k whereas they normally cost $45k! I just bought it though so maybe timing has something to do with it? They aren't selling a ton of Camaros so I think the dealers are starting to come down on pricing.
@Rique Yup, there's plenty of great deals to be had with Camaros. I personally preferred the performance upgrades of the 1ss 1le over the comfort features of the 2ss.
I did take a look at used 5th gen ZL1s but they're all in the $50k range :/
@Rique Not going to happen ever for real..
@Rique You WILL NOT get a brand new 2SS for that EVER. Not gunna happen
Buy a moderately equipped GT for $40000 instead.
Kwan Linus nah
m3n4c32s0c13ty why nah lmao
reignman2112 so you’re saying you would rather get an ecoboost over a gt to be different
Buy a corvette for 40k instead.
@@sacatolasmoreira5593 A base Corvette stingray now is 57k
“Muscle car” and “4 cylinders” doesn’t go together
alot of people in my area have the eco boost mustang and they sound like rice box's and does not go with the car at all
first of all no car now day is truly what a muscle car was back then, when I think of a muscle car, it’s a horse drawn carriage but the horse is a 8L hunk of metal with no stability or traction, moving to smaller displacement is part of time, sorry but if this is what muscle cars are now day
max sebion dodge demon and hellcat? Muscle cars, corvette zr1 and z06 muscle cars, camaro zl1 z28 muscle cars new shelby gt500 muscle car
Jlove buddy, this isn’t up for discussion, muscle cars today are different from muscles cars back then. That’s all the point was
max sebion I suppose you’re saying that for nostalgic reasons, they were definitely amazing cars however you said with time comes smaller displacement, no muscle car back then could dream of coming stock from the factory with 700 horsepower
3 Americans and only 1 muscle car.
@Stephen Hooton actually challenger is basically the last muscle car, camaro is a sports car and mustang went from pony car to sports car so...
Stephen Hooton prove it
Camaro is the best muscle car is more fast than mustang so..
Challenger isn’t a muscle car lol. It’s owned by the fiat.
@@XCVi_MAC it keeps muscle car origins. Mustang and Camaro are just sports cars...
Come on guys......V8 comparison only!!!!
Moses there doing a msrp like they said all about 40 k challenger only one had v8 because it’s the only one that comes with v8 for 40 k
Reagan North The mustang and camaro base v8s are under 40k
Did you miss the price matching part? Idiot
Reagan North yeah I get it but there’s certainly one 5.0 mustang u can get for 38k or add the GT PERFORMANCE package for 41k. They were certainly some bias here for the challenger!!
@@twinturbobeerus1412 hey idiot, you can get a v8 Camaro or mustang for the price as that v8 challenger
Who in their right mind would spend 40k on a mustang or Camaro and opt for the 4cyl???
Right like wtf how do you put a 4cyl against a V8 and try to compare them. Utterly ridiculous
You can get a 2011-2014 Mustang GT with approx less than 60k miles for about $35K or less.
EleazarLarios bro you can get a 2011-2014 GT under 15k, I bought my 2013 GT clean title for 4900.
Camaro looks like a Malibu. Ford picked a Chinese manual gearbox. Challenger comfortably fits 4 adults and keeps the retro looks.
*WARNING* -This review compares two 4 cylinder cars against a V8 Challenger, each for around $40k. Just FYI
The challengers actually around 20-30k
Muscle car??!!!
You know. (Dodge)
Yup, would definitely get the Challenger over the other two.
Clell Biggs challenger is the only option
You know they comparing a 4-cylinder camaro and mustang to a 8-cylinder challenger 😂😂thats how trash challenger is
@@Bangawho They are different classes of cars at this point. Also, that only means if you're smart you'd buy a Challenger
@@charlienash1050 exactly!!
The most American thing I see today
Kwan Linus but no v8? I don’t think so 🥴
@@GCRANDOMVIDEOSHD too bad, the muscle culture has died on but only FCA
Everyone should have atleast one challenger in their garage.
Not sure why we're not comparing V8 cars to other V8 cars
Cause they are comparing on price.
@@Roderickdl there are V8 mustangs that in that price range though
@@Roderickdl I don't disagree with him though I would have chosen the Challenger too
Mild to low optioned v8 and 2 fully optioned 4 bangers.? That's not a comparison. I say compare the stock trims on all the v8 models with no options. That's what I was hoping for this video 😓
@@otto7707 it's a no-brainer to say that a V8 is more fun to drive than a V6
The Fiat challenger is my go to.
It's so old it's really a mercedes challenger
Max Borker well that’s %100 bullshit
TA Package Scat Pack all day !!
This is why I love KBB, they give me straight facts and talk strictly performance while keeping it fair. They dont whine about looks or complain about which one is more comfortable than the others , a damn fine review about 3 modern day American classics.
Would have been fair if, they were all 3 V8's!!! lol
KBB, smh
Can't compare performance with 1 v8 and two 4 bangers. Only thing fair was the price tag nothing else . Was hoping they'd compare all V8s stock trim no options.. That would have been a fair comparison .
@@otto7707 yea,only way to do it. I'd pick SS or GT over that 5.7 HEMI!! "That was Pitiful KBB, come on now"!!
V8 vs V8
@@scarface9617 agreed if they they were going for that 40kish price tag they could up the hemi to the 6.4 then they'd all be fair power wise . Otherwise 5.7 weakest out of the V8s .. I've test driven all the current model years .. I want to own them all ha
@@scarface9617 um... If they were NA 4 bangers then I agree with you.. but these are boosted with turbos.. and Chevy and Ford certainly feel that this is competitive with Dodge 5.7 Hemi.. they priced the 4 bangers the same as Dodge with V8
I bought a 1 year old Challenger RT for 23000 with 17k miles. You cant beat that bang for the buck. 5.7 V8 for 1.6L econobox pricing.
Juandisimo 🤜🏾👊🏾
23000 in one year, last owner beat the shit out that car
Dodge Challenger for sure. No doubt.
Slow. Im positive it would come dead last in a race
@@mr.realistic9791 These are sport/muscle cars. No one is really gonna try and race then
True!!!
you guys spent 40k on a 4 cylinder camaro?
Yeah why would ya do that its kinda like a crime i think
You could pay half of that and get a Mustang Cobra supercharged :/
Which one will be the most reliable?
$42,000 for a 4cyl?
No thanks, im Already Gay....
Pkmn Trainer Eevee its not, im being "funny"
Most people got the v6 version of these cars and pretend they bought the v8.
Joe Exotic exactly 😂
Challenger is best looking in the bunch
Absolutely not
Mustang would smoke challenger because the Challenger is a heavy boat.
Imma mustang fan
5.7 hemi + manual transmission. Can't beat that for the price. Good choice, micah
Thats over priced you can get a scat pack for that same price, the 5.7 is actually around 25k
Heart says Challenger, brain says Mustang. Forget the Camaro.
40k eco boost mustang,
ffs I miss the v6 mustang
Seriously,they should have never dropped the V6.
The ecoboost literally has better performance and mileage than the V6. The number of cylinders don’t mean much these days
@@dhruv7759 Stock or straight off the dealers lot, yes. But anyone with experience or some mechanical knowledge knows they neutered the performance numbers of the V6 to sell the eco boost. All one has to do is spend about 2k dollars to bring the V6 up to par. Plus the V6 has way more performance potential , more reliability, and is built to last longer.
list of the basic upgrades:
intake: CAI K&N $250
engine ECU: SCT X4 tuner with 3 MPT Tune bundle $450 ( eco 87 tune for 32 mpg hwy daily driving, 87 sport tune, & 93 performance tune)
engine: BBK Ceramic Shorty Headers $430 (went with the $100 more expensive ones for better heat management)
exhaust: MagnaFlow Catback exhaust $1100 (any cat-back will do for better air flow, just pick one with an X pipe and the sound you like)
total: $2,230 add $200 more for a mechanic to install the headers and exhaust.
This setup will shave almost a second off on quarter mile times to 13 seconds. Need to spend another 2 grand in upgrades to shave off another second and it will beat a stock V8 stang.
@@Tainted79 and also more cylinders means less load per cylinder making them last longer
@@dhruv7759 so you just not gonna respond?
They need to redesign that Challenger already, the thing is sitting on a 10+ year old flimsy chassis.
Cory R Agree, they need to cut weight down on that dam challenger.
Then it wouldn’t be a challenger and a muscle car
Muscle cars are heavy but strong
This from a Generic Motor Crap plastic two seater fanboi? What? You pissy you’re crapvette still can cut the times of a demon at damn near 1/2 the weight?
The 2020 Camaro LT1 has the 455HP V8 from the SS with a $35,000 base price that's the one to get imo
3LT Camaro: *has a 2 liter 4 cylinder*
69 camaro: Am I a joke to you?
82 Camaro Sport Coupe with Iron Duke: Hold ma beer
Next video should be about trucks:
- Ford F-150
- Toyota Tundra
- Dodge Ram
I agree man but all V8!
Swaggy Jay and Chevy Silverado and Nissan Titan
The challenge scat pack is around 40k and its 485 hp
So is the challenger so low on HP because it's a hemi, or is it just a shity v8? Because I thought most v8 would at least make 400 N/a.
Engine design. Dodge goes for displacement.
Mr. jack it’s because they have a lot of trims if you want real HP you get a R/T scatpack with 485hp
Everyone is just shitting on Chevy and I love it
Dodge fanboi here
That mustang looked so plain
If it was 2010, I'd have a hard time deciding between the Mustang, Camaro, or Challenger. But nowadays with the current models, I think I would just pick the Challenger.
Why not do a 1ss camaro and and a base model mustang gt so that way they’re all under 40k and all v8s?
I think they went for the cheapest performance spec of each model. A Camaro 1LE, eco boost PP, and challenger with the super trac pack. If you were to bump up to 1ss and GT, then it would only be fair to bump up the challenger to a scat pack. Then that becomes more of a performance test than a “all around inexpensive functional American performance car” test
The Challenger all day -- every day!
Hmmmm. I was raised hard-core GM... But Honestly ,, I gotta go with the Mustang.. (It just has a more Appealing Interior )..
Then get a luxury car if that's what your interested in. Much nicer interiors for that kinda money
I bought the 2020 Bullitt. LOVE IT.
But dose it sound American? No, 4 cylinder and v6 doesn’t sound good🥴 not very American.
5.0
All of these maybe muscle cars but they are so different from each other 😕😕😕
Maybe because 2 of em was pony, and 1 of em is big boat
@@kekememe788 It's a boat because you are used to drive tiny cars.
No 5hit the challenger is a muscle car, the other two are sports cars
The challenger weighs more than most compact SUVs. Absolutely ridiculous. I’ve beaten v6 challengers with my 2003 Mustang GT before. Challengers are too heavy. Get the Hemi if you must.
V8 is great💪🏽
All 3 look fun though.
I've driven the 4-cylinder Mustang and Dodge Challenger R/T. They're both incredibly fun! I like the Challenger more, but I can see why some would prefer the Mustang. I can't speak for the Camaro yet :(
@@tenhundredkills I love the sound, rumble and feel of a V8. All of the newer 4 & 6 cylinder engine (and the technologies behind them) come very close and even surpass some of these V8's (including mine). Exciting times for the consumer.
@@atvega7 Definitely exciting times! I love the technology behind today's 4 and 6 cylinder vehicles, but they can't replace that classic V8 sound!
Challenger All The Way - love the old school Muscle Car Look
Should have picked a Challenger Scatpack... That’s closer to the $40k range.
Agreed! looking at getting one here soon .
I liked this comparison - illustrated what you could get at a price point. It also showed a variety of optional choices. Thanks
For 42k I'll the Camaro SS...
$42k for a 4 cyl ponycar😂😂😂. Chevrolet lost their minds. That's a base 6.4 scatpack at MOPAR.
Do this test next year. Bring out the camaros new lit trim, the updated eco boost and whatever trim dodge releases
You can get a 1ss or a decked out v6 camaro for around 40g. I dont understand why yall went with the 4cyl
Man, that Dodge is a ripper even with the 5.7. I'd get an R/T Shaker, cause why not?
Same. Shaker with a body kit, struts 22 in wheels in the back 20 front. Cant go wrong.
@@LowKeyJaded why 22s? Any wheels above 19 just looks stupid, I'd personally choose some 15s with meaty ass tires instead
You guys might want to check your prices, you can build and order a 2019 v6 1le with the recaro package for under $34.000
They are good looking cars.But,he is right,RT all the way.😎👍
you can make the argument that the camaro or mustang is a better SPORTS car.
But its obvious that Dodge has the best MUSCLE car
Yeah it is 2019 Crust Chevrolet Camaro 3LT 2.0L 4-CYLINDER 42,585 275 Hp and 295 Torque $31.000 Vs 2019 Indigo Blue Dodge Challenger R/T 5.7L V8 375 Hp 410 Torque $39,970 Vs 2019 OxFord White Ford Mustang 2.3L 4-CYLINDER 320 Hp 358 Torque $38.980 Ultimate Compact Muscle Cars!!!!!!!!!!!!
I Take the Ford Mustang
None of those will be the fastest on the road but for a daily driver challenger is the way to go rides better more comfy
As a dodge guy, the Camaro sticks out to me most. I would absolutely buy a 2020 Camaro 2SS.
My 2016 Chevy Colorado decently equipped at 35k at LEAST had a V6 and has more power than that Camaro. Sad.
can get last years model mustang with more hp than both of these, and more options for 30k, this was an easy choice
The Challenger is clearly cooking up thee most American recipe here and would be the one I'd buy too even though I'm totally down with tunability and capability of a turbo 4.
Yes, the most American one to u is built in CANADA.
For $40k I'd be looking for deals on a V8 Mustang or Camaro. But I know you guys didn't spec these out
That camaro is a rip off you could get a 2ss with those exact options at the same price
Bull Shit Kelley blue Book 😭
My New 18 EcoBoost Sports Package
Cost 32K MSRP 💰
Tough choice they're all so good I'll take the stinger 😉
1dodger🥇
2mustang 🥈
3camaro🥉🚗🚗🚗
You could have tested the gt SS and scatpack for under 40k smh who's going to pay 40k for a 4 cylinder Camaro or mustang??
Just bought a brand new 2019 Charger ScatPack for 38k.....485 hp 475 torque.. Dodge kills it with the $$$ to HP ratio!
Is it a base scat!??
Yes. I dont care about leather, painted calipers, sunroof, or fancier tech that will be costlier to repair down the line.
@@edubhall damn that's a good way to look at it... I may have to go that route.
I like muscles cars but then I find 4 cylinder cars such as STIs, evos, focus RS beating them. That's when I realize muscles cars don't have such "muscles"🤦♂️
Moises Radilla that’s why you need to get the real muscle.. try a Demon
Aint no way in hell stock stis etx beating stock muscle cars camaros and mustangs coming with almost 500hp be for real
Missed opportunity here to compare the base Mustang GT, Challenger R/T, and Camaro LT1. All V8, all $34-$36k.
That Camaro doesn’t look so good.
I get muscle, but I wish they cut the weight down/get it more lean with the Challenger and keep the length.
Edit: I mean the Challenger getting lean. The Camaro is certainly much leaner considering how they removed a lot of weight since last gen.
Chevy changed it for the 2020 model year. They know how ugly it looks.
Did I hear that right? Get the Camaro more lean? The Camaro weighs almost 600 lbs less and that's with the Challenger's v6. If we are talking about the ones one's in this review. You are looking at over 600 lbs difference. V8 for v8, it's almost a 500 lbs difference. I would like to make it longer for more interior room. But as it stands it's probably the lightest of the being compared in this review. Granted with all the options that it has. It might weigh more than the mustang.
Anthony Weeks My bad, I meant the Challenger getting more lean.
The Camaro's so lean it almost doesn't look like a muscle car
Could i fit my friends in the back of a mustang if theyre around 5'6 to 5'8?🤔
AMERIKSOCCRCLUB I fit my tall friends in the back of my jcw mini, so yes you can haha
Most likely. I'm 5'9", and I do fit in the back of my Mustang GT, but I have to slouch a bit, or tilt my head. I had taller friends test drive. You might have to juggle leg room a bit.
My son is 5'8" and doesn't fit in my friend's mustang at all. He fits in my challenger though.
I'm 5'10" and I can't fit in the back of a Mustang. I can't imagine that being two inches shorter would have made much of a difference.
42k for a 4 banger 🤣🤣🤣
I'll make it easy. Buy the Mustang. The 5.0 is great, and you can do a lot of stuff to them and make them a fun daily. Camaro? I'm 5ft 6in, and I feel cramped sitting inside one. It's bigger than the Mustang but smaller on the inside!!!? 🤔 Challenger? The 5.7 Hemi has no power, and the car weighs as much as a semi truck. Unless you get one with at least the 392 6.4 Hemi....dont bother.
I would pick the SS or GT either one over the Dodge but, if I was to get a Dodge it would most definitely have to be the 6.4L!!
Wow ....just wasted 6 min of my life ill never get back!🤦🏽♂️
just bought an 2018 R/T, thanks for the input!!
Mopar or no car 😤
the camaro looks nice
I’ll take a V8 please !!!
How about a comparison between a Camaro SS 1LE, Vs Mustang GT performance pack 2 and Challenger Scat Pack widebody with a manual?
i love ford mustang
The V6 Camaro 1LE would spank both in the track and drag strip 😈
The v6 Camaro will lose to the mustang with the 10 speed automatic. Mustang has better power weight ratio and has more power. Around a track it will win because it's the 1le version.
Yusuf Elsayed So, you are saying that if the Camaro were Automatic it would be faster in the drag strip.
@@cubanamerican22 yes. Automatics are faster usually in a drag race especially if it's a automatic dual transmission. The mustang doesn't have dual clutch automatic tho. It has a torque converter automatic transmission. Dual clutch automatics are usually quicker than automatic torque converter but not always. The 2017 Camaro Zl1 with the 10 speed automatic transmission shifts faster than the porsche's PDK dual clutch.
The V6 1LE version has only 335HP compared to the mustang gt with the 460HP. The Camaro SS V8 1LE will have a better chance because it has 455HP.
*American Pony Cars
The challenger was reborn in 08 as a muscle car.
Well here in Australia only the mustang is available from the manufacturer
The dodge is the only muscle car
It's the only v8!! Lol
Awesome review Micah. Keep up the good work.
Challenger: When the Camera car is faster around the track
Ecoboost is getting a high performance added later this year that gives it 330 hp with a mid 4 sec 0-60. And under 30k, I think I'll wait to see if that's worth it before jumping on one. I was moving towards Challenger but damn is that Ecoboost a good buy
Josh Davis as a owner of 2019 EcoBoost you won’t be disappointed. Although my car doesn’t sound like a v8 it’s definitely got plenty of hp and Torque. My best 0-60 so far is 5.4 seconds.
@@chad5191 great! Thank you. I'll wait for 2020 version so I can save but it's going to be top contender when I start looking for sure!
The Dodge's interior looks like shit and it's so old looking compared to the other two.
The challenger has the nicest interior, the Ford is old and cheaply made with blocks for buttons. The Chevy is as nice but it's got GM plastics. The challenger is more of a baser with still metal and soft touch materials everywhere.
I'll take one of each please
Pfft! Challenger is still a pony car, not a sports coupe, unlike the other 2
$40K for a 4 cylinder? lol, I'll get a Type R, WRX or Golf R for that price without the laughable GM build quality
Edit: i have some experience with Chevy. I love the LS motor but my mom was the first owner of a 2014 Malibu for less than 20,000 miles before bailing for her second Highlander. The thing was so cheap for a modern car
Are they all entry level?
Driving all three of those coupe's is the only way to gain enough perspective on which one would fit the bill for any one person. Great review, Micah.
Does anyone know if the ecoboost mustangs come in a manual option? I honestly think it would be pretty fun to drive if so
So your telling me I can get a 392 Hemi for the same price as a turbo 4 cyl, yeah I know which one I’m picking
For $40000 just get a V8 mustang camaro and challenger. Be it GT, SS or RT scat pack.
Amen.
Good vid but can you compare scat pack, mustang GT PP2 and Camaro SS 1LE