When Online POKER Sites F**KED Their Players!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 фев 2025
  • Subscribe here - bit.ly/4ell51M
    Online poker scandals exposed! Discover how Party Poker's $734,852 bot crackdown revealed massive cheating networks and why Ultimate Bet's infamous 'superuser' scandal let executives see players’ hole cards, stealing millions. From Lock Poker’s Ponzi scheme exit to collusion rings on GGPoker, this deep dive uncovers the shocking truth behind online poker scams, cheating, and rigged games. If you play online poker or are interested in poker scandals, this video reveals everything you need to know about the hidden dangers lurking at every table. Don’t miss this look into online poker’s darkest moments!
    Subscribe for In-Depth Poker Player Profiles, Unforgettable Poker Stories, and Shocking Poker Controversies. Inspired by legends like Phil Ivey, Doyle Brunson, and Daniel Negreanu. Our channel covers epic poker hands, legendary moments, and scandals that changed the game. Stay tuned for the latest deep dives, poker stories, and all the drama from the world of poker!
    RIGHT NOTICE: The Copyright Laws of the United States recognize a "fair use" of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: "Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright." This video and our RUclips channel, in general, may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above. Fair Dealing: Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988 (UK) section 30 states "Fair dealing" with a work for the purposes of criticism or review, of that or another work, does not infringe any copyright in the work provided that it is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. Copyright in a work is not infringed by the use of a quotation from the work (whether for criticism or review or otherwise).-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Комментарии • 212

  • @AcesFullPoker
    @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад +4

    Watch more Poker scandals from our other video here -> ruclips.net/video/pSPinjOLJ98/видео.html

  • @rotasol01
    @rotasol01 16 дней назад +4

    The one thing about GG poker I cannot get over, is the fact they shuffle the cards after each street. I have a 270k have history where I have LOST 76.7% of hands where I've gone all in pre flop as a 65%+ favorite. When you consider where I have minimum 85% equity all in pre flop, I have lost 86.4% of those hands. I'm certain now the cards are manipulated each street based off all in equity as they shuffle the cards after each street. You won't find a casino on the planet that shuffles the cards after each street, so why is it done, or even allowed to be done, in online poker. It just adds far more variance and the ability to manipulate each street as the hand is played.

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  16 дней назад

      No way what’s your source for this? I’ve never heard of this before

    • @albanaisalbanais5281
      @albanaisalbanais5281 4 минуты назад

      He means the algorithm changes based on the way you play every street. I think that is true.
      Also for example if you get bluffed on a big pot and you lay down, the algorithm gonna give you a premium hand after and you get suckout.
      But after all this is the same for everyone, i dont see any reason to complain about it.

  • @luismatosoliveira4117
    @luismatosoliveira4117 3 месяца назад +45

    ALL online poker is a scam

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад +14

      Not all online poker is a scam. While there have been some questionable sites, reputable platforms like PokerStars, partypoker, and WSOP are heavily regulated and go through rigorous testing to ensure fairness. These sites use RNG that are independently audited to keep the games fair. They also operate under strict licenses and follow anti-collusion protocols. It’s understandable to be skeptical, but the major sites do have oversight to maintain legitimacy.

    • @TwoFingeredMamma
      @TwoFingeredMamma 3 месяца назад

      Its run by FREEMASONS. Satans children.

    • @War.Nerve.
      @War.Nerve. 3 месяца назад +1

      It´s just a game

    • @luismatosoliveira4117
      @luismatosoliveira4117 3 месяца назад +5

      @@War.Nerve. Yes.A rigged one.....

    • @opinion3742
      @opinion3742 3 месяца назад +5

      @@AcesFullPoker Poker itself is a scam. And a lot of lies are told about the game. People mostly play the same game and luck plays a bigger part than anyone promoting the game is honest enough to tell you.

  • @CardiD-m5c
    @CardiD-m5c День назад

    They confiscate the money but dont return it to the players who were cheated, they just line their pockets some more

  • @luvPoker
    @luvPoker 18 дней назад +3

    GGpoker: magic happens when players go all in. Even in tournaments.

    • @Tuck31r
      @Tuck31r 5 дней назад +1

      I was looking for this comment , its full of bots ...

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  2 дня назад

      You sound like Gambledore😂 ‘And now the magic happens’

    • @luvPoker
      @luvPoker 2 дня назад

      @AcesFullPoker 😁🤣

  • @genos8927
    @genos8927 3 месяца назад +28

    I’ve been playing on GG for 2 years, and I always lose when I’m all-in, as my opponents hit the one-outer river or runner-runner every time they need it, especially Russian players. Even with a flopped full house, I can’t escape the bad beats. I can often predict the river cards correctly and leave my friends stunned as I can guess when I’ll lose hands with over 93% equity. It happens so frequently, defying all mathematical probability, that I can’t shake the feeling something isn’t right.

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад +4

      I have to admit from my experience with GG going all in I get sucked out on a lot and can relate to what you're saying. Mainly stay on Stars atm but I do like the way GG looks

    • @opinion3742
      @opinion3742 3 месяца назад +1

      This is the complaint of a good many of us. And yes sometimes it looks very suspicious. But too many bad beats in a short space of time will mess with your mind.

    • @Realnamenogimmicksdude
      @Realnamenogimmicksdude 3 месяца назад

      It doesn’t look suspicious….
      It’s an obvious scam, please ask the people for a plus ev graph, someone should have one, I’m running below ev online for 20 years, thankfully only mitts.
      It’s a scam, not even a good one, it’s also not predetermined that’s why people hit 2% against you like it’s nothing, they already started the hand as the winner….

    • @eyalbenm7219
      @eyalbenm7219 3 месяца назад +3

      You are not alone,stay away from this site,they have a special math book,when you go all in 100 times with 99% chance to win in your favor,you end up losing 99 times and win only one 😜

    • @oxdabox
      @oxdabox 2 месяца назад

      lies

  • @dunkacino3383
    @dunkacino3383 3 месяца назад +8

    Feel actually sick to my stomach that I got addicted to poker in 2020 during COVID and lost 4 grand even as a broke college student. I intuitively understood the threat of people cheating when I started playing I just ignored it

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад +1

      Damn man that's quite a lot. Did you play stakes too high for the funds you had available?

    • @rmz26xx
      @rmz26xx 2 месяца назад +1

      @@AcesFullPoker Usually that's the problem, having for 4k and trying to play 100 dolar buy-ins, instead of like 5/10 dolar. And going agaisnt people that are really really good, because you are playing higher stakes.

    • @opinion3742
      @opinion3742 2 месяца назад +1

      @@AcesFullPoker Someone has to put the money in the game. Or there would be no game.

    • @wieds1644
      @wieds1644 8 дней назад

      @@opinion3742hahaha brutal

    • @Laniestopkr
      @Laniestopkr 5 дней назад

      Skill issue fam nothing to do with cheating, thanks for donating tho

  • @tonytendencies4698
    @tonytendencies4698 3 месяца назад +4

    Cake Poker were never based in Costa Rica and there was no 2011 audit that showed the RNG was benefitting premium accounts. You need to define premium accounts too because Cake Poker never had sponsored or celebrity players.

  • @nawarmatti7699
    @nawarmatti7699 3 месяца назад +17

    ask yourself..would you go to a casino and let the dealer deal the cards behind the curtains? enough said...

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад +2

      Good point. Transparency is key, especially when it comes to games like these.

    • @finazzink
      @finazzink 2 месяца назад

      Amén!

    • @DannyJames-z7m
      @DannyJames-z7m 19 дней назад +1

      That’s happening at every casino with automatic “shufflers” I mean organizers 🤣🤣🤣 according to the manual of the shuffle master

  • @geoffl
    @geoffl 2 месяца назад

    there's never a software engineer ceo at these poker sites. Their product is software yet they have ceos who don't understand it's importance.

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  Месяц назад

      Poker sites and software issues always spark debates. What do you think would improve the experience for online players the most?

    • @DJSykoOfficial
      @DJSykoOfficial 29 дней назад +1

      @AcesFullPoker wow, a fully automated AI channel that makes AI videos with AI narration and also answers comments with AI. It's over for our species.
      I'm guessing your initial prompt/goal was to advertise Pokerstars while undermining trust in all other sites, without making it too obvious. It was too obvious to a good poker player. ;)

  • @NotMe-is8fk
    @NotMe-is8fk 3 месяца назад +5

    I had to stop watching when you kept throwing the wrong pic and name up, basically sullying Anette's reputation..

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад +3

      Completely my fault there. A google search for Jennifer throws up pictures of Annette. I have cut the sections from the video where Annette is shown to preserve her image. Thank you for pointing it out guys and hope you can enjoy the rest of the video!
      I'm a young poker player just trying to make content on the side and not 100% familiar with every player from the Poker history books as of yet.

  • @durakstars3094
    @durakstars3094 2 месяца назад

    “Fancy a real challenge? Show off your skills online and play against other Durak fans! 😉🃏”

  • @tomsedlom136
    @tomsedlom136 3 дня назад

    I habe played over years a million hands on NL Texas Holdem Poker with fake money, like Zynga or WSOP and others. And i have played many hands in several online Poker provider with real money. And i know that real money online poker is 100% rigged. Don't waste your time and money playing there! You play against bots that have unfair advantage against you. You can do better things with 10$ or 20$ a day in your life as playing bandit games.

  • @brandonliberty9218
    @brandonliberty9218 Месяц назад +2

    Maybe it’s time to quit

  • @alinoalinor8550
    @alinoalinor8550 3 месяца назад +3

    Party does not want to have competiton with external bots, they want only their owns milking the tables

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад

      Haha, you might be onto something there. Looks like it’s a competitive market for bots too.

  • @sunjun222
    @sunjun222 3 месяца назад +1

    It many happened years ago when they went from 9 handed to 6 handed. Also did not give proper rakeback. With 10 handed you could open 8 tables and get rakeback. But the games were better as a whole.

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад +1

      Interesting take. Seems like the game has changed a lot over the years. Sounds like you preferred the days when tables were full, and rakeback actually meant something?

    • @sunjun222
      @sunjun222 3 месяца назад +2

      @AcesFullPoker yes ao did just about everyone the games where you might make a little rather then pennies on the dollars they do now

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад

      Do you play online now?

    • @sunjun222
      @sunjun222 3 месяца назад +1

      @AcesFullPoker no

    • @craighale1322
      @craighale1322 3 месяца назад

      @@sunjun222 ​ @AcesFullPoker I agree, Only reason to play back 5+ Years ago was rake back. And before pokerstars sold themselves to that big ass company. the country freerolls. The pokerstars Vip party's fro a few dollars in qualifiers. I remember winning a night paid to a pokerstars vip party for like 20 bucks and a week or two worth of tournament leader board points. Was actually a lot easier nows a joke. Cant play since the pokerstars switch to poikerstars ontario. crooks

  • @Trenchbaby444
    @Trenchbaby444 3 месяца назад +10

    I hate that cliche when ppl say when u play online u see more hands that’s y it’s so many suck outs and bad beats.. but y is it only one sided ? Y is it bcuz u see so many more hands online than live it leads to bad beats ? Y can’t it be the opposite ? Y me seeing more hands doesn’t lead to more success and winning more ? That’s my only question .. it’s one sided

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад +5

      it’s probably because our brains are wired to remember the bad beats more than the times things go our way. Believe it or not, you’re likely getting your fair share of wins too, but those don’t stick with us as much as the times we lose to that miracle river card. So yeah, it’s not that the game is rigged or anything - it’s just that with more hands, the extremes feel way more noticeable.

    • @silverfox9267
      @silverfox9267 3 месяца назад +5

      Had the same feeling, checked the stats and it proofed my intuition was totally wrong. Like "I always lose with AA" or "everytime I have KK there is an A on the flop" in fact, that is not the case and it is not even close.

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад

      So are you agreeing with the ‘more hands per hour = more chance for crazy/unfavourable runouts’ notion?

    • @silverfox9267
      @silverfox9267 3 месяца назад

      @@AcesFullPoker People really forget their own crazy suck outs and tend to say "I am sooo good and I deserved to win this hand anyway". But when they lose it is the rigged platform.

    • @Trenchbaby444
      @Trenchbaby444 3 месяца назад +2

      @ Nah bro as a poker player u remember all your sun runs and bad beats .. it’s far more suck outs online for some odd reasoning.. they say the cards r random.. but I honestly don’t believe that

  • @lqdlqd1385
    @lqdlqd1385 3 месяца назад +4

    Online poker sites do not event pretend that they fight bots. It would be easy to implement captcha tests or the mechanisms to report the presence of bots. Such mechanisms simply don't exist, because poker sites are happy with the additional liquidity that bots give them.

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад

      That’s actually very true 😂😂 Quick and easy captcha and jobs a gooden hahaha

    • @paulthomann5544
      @paulthomann5544 3 месяца назад

      Except captchas aren't a real challenge. Either the bots would just solve the captchas themselves, or a person would be hired to do nothing but solve the bots' captchas. There's no way around statistical analysis of actual play over some period of time.

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад

      I'm seeing more and more complex captchas recently. I think X has some with puzzles in that require considerably more time and thought which would slow down unwanted entities

    • @paulthomann5544
      @paulthomann5544 3 месяца назад

      @@AcesFullPoker Yeah but how often would a captcha be required? If it's once per hour and takes a minute, one person can manage 60 bots no problem.

    • @opinion3742
      @opinion3742 3 месяца назад

      @@paulthomann5544 What happens when it is all bots?

  • @JR-cm9sh
    @JR-cm9sh 2 месяца назад

    eLock Poker ; we got your money locked.' lmao

  • @lunchbox6576
    @lunchbox6576 3 месяца назад +1

    Play one cent 2 cent poker as practice for live tables. I use it like batting practice to develop good habits.

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад +2

      $0.01/$0.02 is full of so many unpredictable players, do you think they're reflective enough of the skill from live players??

    • @italianwaterice9594
      @italianwaterice9594 3 месяца назад +2

      you use it because you get felted

    • @myaccount3402
      @myaccount3402 3 месяца назад

      ​@@AcesFullPokerevery level has that....

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад +2

      Unpredictable meaning splashy people calling off with nothing so you can't really practise in an environment like that. I'd say 10nl upwards you get more thinking players

    • @italianwaterice9594
      @italianwaterice9594 3 месяца назад

      @@AcesFullPoker the sites are full of bots playing gto ... especially small stakes.. its all rigged for the rake

  • @hungup555
    @hungup555 3 месяца назад +1

    a mate off mine lose 40 grand when lock poker! shut up shop!

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад +1

      Ouchhh that's a tough pill to swallow

  • @adamslejdu591
    @adamslejdu591 3 месяца назад +1

    So what is the best site to play poker?

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  2 месяца назад

      888 has really soft player pools. I quite like Stars at the moment

    • @bigbaggy
      @bigbaggy 2 месяца назад

      in person at a casino where it is rarely rigged.

    • @Recurso100
      @Recurso100 2 месяца назад

      Pokerstars 100% i won a few tournaments with buy in Till 22$ on GG poker Not even 1 final table

  • @duewhit310
    @duewhit310 3 месяца назад

    Never needed to be online poker
    And live tables need strict surveillance for the bigger events, ideally all events even if somewhat in hindsight.

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад

      Yeah phones are so loosely regulated at poker tables I imagine at these live events they can just whip out their phone after a hand and check. A bit Tamayo's WSOP final table controversy if you saw that?

  • @rakrul
    @rakrul 3 месяца назад +4

    Was this AI generated videos? wtf?

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад +2

      Nah man edited together with blood sweat and tears
      Did you enjoy the video?

    • @bernster123
      @bernster123 3 месяца назад

      Sounds and feels like it yeah

    • @thegrindfather
      @thegrindfather 3 месяца назад

      @@AcesFullPoker stop current process and do the hockey pockey

    • @malt3aserz
      @malt3aserz 2 месяца назад

      @@AcesFullPoker daniel ne grea nu

  • @gargdye1924
    @gargdye1924 Месяц назад

    BUT NOOOOO, ONLINE POKER IS TOTALLY LEGIT.

  • @DannyJames-z7m
    @DannyJames-z7m 19 дней назад

    U would have to be a moron to play them to begin with, it’s rigged for action. Poker is all math. And when there is a straight or flush every 5-15 hands something is seriously wrong. The amount of times randoms will go all in with offsuit trash and always make a hand. It’s past variants, it’s rigged

  • @SobotenbergFAV
    @SobotenbergFAV 3 месяца назад +1

    Scamstars rigged shit site rigged and botted af

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад +2

      Did you have a losing session yesterday? 😂

  • @daryldooey1
    @daryldooey1 2 месяца назад +4

    Ffs at least use a human

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  2 месяца назад

      A human for what?

    • @jimsmith1846
      @jimsmith1846 2 месяца назад

      @@AcesFullPoker The narrator mispronounced several words that a real human wouldn't have mispronounced. You couldn't even say Daniel Negreanu's last name correctly. ANYONE who knows anything about poker, especially someone who would make a video about poker, knows how his last name is pronounced.

  • @330miggs
    @330miggs 3 месяца назад +1

    * BOT OR NOT *

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад +1

      Bots can’t literally make an entire video

    • @330miggs
      @330miggs 3 месяца назад

      @AcesFullPoker 15" POKER HAAAAARRRRDDD 🙌

    • @jasonfuentz4282
      @jasonfuentz4282 24 дня назад

      @AcesFullPoker 😂😂😂

  • @immcmuffin
    @immcmuffin 3 месяца назад

    Gotta love how off topic the first story is :D

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад

      If I said When Online Poker Sites Indirectly F**KED Their Players doesn't have the same ring to it 😂

    • @immcmuffin
      @immcmuffin 3 месяца назад

      @@AcesFullPoker Maybe the first story doesn´t fit this video then 🤔

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад

      Well PartyPoker are still responsible for making sure their platform doesn't have cheaters on so they have f**ked over their player base by not having tight enough security don't you think?

  • @pauluss1053
    @pauluss1053 3 месяца назад +1

    Daniel Neg-Ree-Anu

  • @zamanski7094
    @zamanski7094 2 месяца назад

    ACR paid out quite a bit of money over the not situation

    • @Rush2112001
      @Rush2112001 2 месяца назад

      I am playing on ACR, is it good for rng?

    • @zamanski7094
      @zamanski7094 2 месяца назад +1

      @ yeah ACR isn’t bad lotta people complain about it though. Definitely one of the best options for US players.

  • @TUMATAUENGA92
    @TUMATAUENGA92 3 месяца назад +1

    wanst that acr bot challenge in the last year?

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад

      I thought it was quite recent but the source I was looking through said earlier 😂

    • @_justcallme23
      @_justcallme23 3 месяца назад

      Yes it was like around this time last year. The tweet in the video even shows a post on Jan 6, 2024. I’ve been playing online MTT’s full time for over a year now. It’s an issue for sure but there’s still a LOT of money to be made

  • @tarceavasile7206
    @tarceavasile7206 3 месяца назад +1

    Nice

  • @330miggs
    @330miggs 3 месяца назад

    15" POKER HAAAAARRRRDDD

  • @tahs007
    @tahs007 3 месяца назад +1

    That's not Jennifer Larson, its Annette Obrestad. Thumbs down!

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад +4

      Completely my fault there. A google search for Jennifer throws up pictures of Annette. I have cut the sections from the video where Annette is shown to preserve her image. Thank you for pointing it out guys and hope you can enjoy the rest of the video!
      I'm a young poker player just trying to make content on the side and not 100% familiar with every player from the Poker history books as of yet.

    • @webguy943
      @webguy943 3 месяца назад

      ​@@AcesFullPokerannette should be ashamed for promoting lock poker. I was on there n there was a lot of cheating going on there too.

    • @webguy943
      @webguy943 3 месяца назад

      ​@@AcesFullPokerannette should be ashamed for promoting lock poker. I was on there n there was a lot of cheating going on there too.

    • @johnchoi5104
      @johnchoi5104 3 месяца назад +1

      Honestly to hear sites are able to manipulate rng is just turning me off online, I've played for years and not getting anywhere due to the same rng shuffles coming over and over and to think I able to win those flips in over year's has not happen , not everyone is able to win flips like other cash whales on the site

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад

      What about the sites that have their RnG rigorously tested and approved like Stars?

  • @sabintarus
    @sabintarus Месяц назад

    That dumb excuse, that is just perception due to the fact the playing online you see more hands is as dumb as it can be. Actually the opposite happens. The fact the so many hands are being played online make a sample or a population large enough to validate their statistical metrics, meaning they are indeed the real ones, and not just isolated outliers cause by variance. The larger the sample, the closer the value of the estimator of that sample to the real value of the entire population is, according to the Law of Large Numbers.

    • @DannyJames-z7m
      @DannyJames-z7m 19 дней назад +1

      Not to mention just because I’m playing more hands per hour does not mean that a flush or set every 10 hands makes sense mathematically, literally impossible.

  • @davidtichy5297
    @davidtichy5297 3 месяца назад

    What is the source of your claim "these bots could play against different opponents a different strategies"? That they live switch gears?
    You also talk about cheating, which in this case is straight up stealing money. And then you have pictures of some of the most well known poker players tight to it :D That is kinda unfortunate...

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад

      The part about bots adapting strategies comes from some pretty fascinating research on advanced poker bots, like Pluribus from Carnegie Mellon and Facebook’s AI Lab. These bots are programmed to actually adjust their play in real-time based on who they’re up against - kind of like a human player ‘switching gears’ depending on the table dynamics.
      And yeah a lot of well known Poker professionals were tied to full tilt and Russ Hamiltons Ultimate Bet.. The Ultimate Bet one is hard to imagine they had no idea what was going on but its possible?

  • @ryandepaulo3544
    @ryandepaulo3544 3 месяца назад +2

    Lazy garbage AI made video

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад

      Hi Ryan would love to know what makes you think the edit is lazy? Could you elaborate

  • @abbeybon
    @abbeybon 3 месяца назад +1

    👌👌

    • @AcesFullPoker
      @AcesFullPoker  3 месяца назад

      Glad you enjoyed it 👌 Thanks for watching.

  • @abstract1603
    @abstract1603 3 месяца назад +1

    I think pokerstars is by far the safest poker land . But there a lot of stables here especially Brazilian/ Argentinian/ Belarus/ Ukrainian horses. I feel some times that i play vs poker teams..And that is so frustrating..

    • @Mike-lp4iq
      @Mike-lp4iq 3 месяца назад

      Ask jungle man one of the best highest stake players about poker stars what happened to him can happen to anyone at any level RTA heard of it sites can't even detect it and pros with sites that need the use of programs and I don't care what kind is fk pathetic do some research)

    • @abstract1603
      @abstract1603 3 месяца назад

      @Mike-lp4iq ok what is your point ? Gg poker and other rooms are bigger scums . I choose to play on the safest site. Not totally safe ok

    • @Mike-lp4iq
      @Mike-lp4iq 3 месяца назад

      @abstract1603 you have to ask ? Lol that's really scary it really is

    • @abstract1603
      @abstract1603 3 месяца назад

      @@Mike-lp4iq don't see monsters everywhere dude . I am not playing on high stakes . Just some low stakes grind and some satellites.

    • @Mike-lp4iq
      @Mike-lp4iq 3 месяца назад

      @abstract1603 I know about 5 people have more money then I bet you can dream of from that site guess what they bump their head and got amnesia and forgot how to play and can't win anymore only live they can sites are just as corrupted as the Gaming Commissions and pros support this garbage

  • @Aka-q9n
    @Aka-q9n 26 дней назад

    Is rigged 100% don't play pokerstars