Micca MB42 vs Edifier 1280t

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 окт 2024

Комментарии • 39

  • @boblaws7582
    @boblaws7582 4 года назад +29

    Miccas have better midrange while the Edifiers sounded muddy, so my choice would be the budget friendly Miccas.

    • @lalitsingh4826
      @lalitsingh4826 3 года назад +3

      But you will need an AMP.

    • @jungleking9703
      @jungleking9703 2 года назад +1

      It's obvious because they have more wattage so they are farrer from their point of distortion than the edifier.

  • @imaflymydroneatit
    @imaflymydroneatit Год назад +1

    So I have a nice little Amp that I replaced and I don't want it to go to waste. I'm looking for some passive desktop speakers for work since I'm alone a lot at work and can listen to music.
    Three years later what would you suggest for passive speakers?

  •  3 года назад +3

    Micca has a powered bookshelf speaker now, PB42X to be exact, u should try those when u find a chance. Basically they are the same speakers as the MB42X with an amp.

    • @sazzad_hossain.s
      @sazzad_hossain.s  3 года назад

      I have video on mb42 vs mb42x, check it out, since they are same speakers I didn't bother getting pb42x lol could be worth a try

    •  3 года назад +1

      @@sazzad_hossain.s they are, except powered ones have only 15 watts per channel max and the passive ones are 75 watts as u know. I wonder if that effects the sound quality, but in this video u hooked up the MB42s to an amp with 15 watts per channel too and they sounded pretty good actually. So maybe the powered ones should be good too, right?

    • @hipidipi20157max
      @hipidipi20157max 22 дня назад

      But less watts

  • @jericoanacan76
    @jericoanacan76 3 года назад +3

    U can adjust the edifiers tone controls bit more to adjust the treble. That's why there are there for?

  • @madcrabber1113
    @madcrabber1113 Месяц назад +2

    The Edifiers sound defective.

  • @SleekBlack82
    @SleekBlack82 3 года назад +2

    Can you please tell me if the Micca MB42 work with a Fosi Audio TDA7498E Amplifier?

    • @sazzad_hossain.s
      @sazzad_hossain.s  3 года назад +1

      Yep, will work just fine

    • @SleekBlack82
      @SleekBlack82 3 года назад +1

      Okay, Thankyou so much for replying. Appreciate it :)
      I have another question though... Do these speakers accept standard 4mm Banana Plugs for the Amplifier connection?

  • @manuelcaycedo561
    @manuelcaycedo561 3 года назад +1

    awesome video brother thank you!

  • @cmoneytheman
    @cmoneytheman Год назад

    Yesterday bought eds from bay for 70 upgrading from cr3s

  • @jjjilani9634
    @jjjilani9634 2 года назад

    What about RB42? That is a better Micca.

  • @EPandLPVinylRecords
    @EPandLPVinylRecords 4 года назад

    Hello I have Yamaha RX V683 AVR, I need a height speaker. Micca MB42 is good for this?

    • @sazzad_hossain.s
      @sazzad_hossain.s  4 года назад

      So you mean surround speakers? Miccas will work great with that AVR, as long as you're ok with it's frequency range

  • @SamInCanada
    @SamInCanada 3 года назад

    I have the Micca MB42 speakers but they have little bass - I have to pair them with a sub. I am not sure where the big bass was from in the video. A hidden sub??

    • @sazzad_hossain.s
      @sazzad_hossain.s  3 года назад +2

      Try adjusting the bass If you amp or receiver allow it, the bass isn't big like a subwoofer but it's adequate enough for close range, no hidden sub lol

    • @RogerYng
      @RogerYng 3 года назад

      You don’t have the X version.

  • @lalrosangafanai6353
    @lalrosangafanai6353 2 года назад

    Can you suggest a budget friendly amp for micca

  • @roninnovastar1321
    @roninnovastar1321 2 года назад

    Do you need an AMP to power these speakers ? or can plugging into a high powered reciever with old school wires do the trick ?

  • @lalrosangafanai6353
    @lalrosangafanai6353 2 года назад

    Suggest 2.1 channel amp

  • @ankitpanchal9104
    @ankitpanchal9104 3 года назад

    Good job 👍

  • @shahzaibihsan3259
    @shahzaibihsan3259 4 года назад

    the mic can't seem to handle the pressure, please add a low bass track to compare mids as well

  • @nickdad7136
    @nickdad7136 4 года назад

    is Micca suitable for Nad 320 BEE?

    • @sazzad_hossain.s
      @sazzad_hossain.s  4 года назад +1

      Yes, it should be fine. Ohms and watts seems to be within compatibility

    • @nickdad7136
      @nickdad7136 4 года назад

      @@sazzad_hossain.s thank you Sir

  • @maheshkarampuri6727
    @maheshkarampuri6727 3 года назад

    Bro, Music name ?

    • @sazzad_hossain.s
      @sazzad_hossain.s  3 года назад +2

      ruclips.net/video/koeObMIFBjg/видео.html&ab_channel=1261Clan

  • @maheshkarampuri6727
    @maheshkarampuri6727 3 года назад

    Song Name ?

  • @one234569and10
    @one234569and10 8 месяцев назад

    Audio over YT is really not a great way to test the sound... HOWEVER, knowing that.. the Micca's sound way better, and the Edifires just sound muddy and meh.
    BTW - yes, I know this is a 3 year old video, but I am looking for something under 100 that I can use on my desk.

  • @yaabaa
    @yaabaa 6 месяцев назад +1

    Hi. This is my useless comment for the day!!!
    I'm assuming Micca is pronounced "Mick-a" not "Mike-a" as it has two letter Cs in the name 😂😂

  • @roland-plus
    @roland-plus День назад

    The Edifiers are junk. You are better off buying older Polk Audio or something like it in the same size

    • @sazzad_hossain.s
      @sazzad_hossain.s  День назад

      @@roland-plus Gasp! You know, after many years of using edifiers, I've been aching for a change lol