Flying the Comanche

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 окт 2024

Комментарии • 22

  • @jesspeters1213
    @jesspeters1213 4 года назад +1

    My best Friend owned one of them. We flew somewhere almost every week for the $100 burger. It was fast and comfortable and a dream to fly. His annuals cost him 10K most years. Longest flight we took was to Osh Kosh from Riverside CA.

  • @pappyodanial
    @pappyodanial Год назад +1

    Great landing love that AOA

  • @yahatinda
    @yahatinda 9 лет назад +1

    That 400 was a TURKEY,Got to fly my pals new 1964 250. .3 of us went ZAHNS to MIA. Way back we did a front starting at 10,000 .My first actual IFR. Got some water in through the vents

  • @larrypnh
    @larrypnh 10 лет назад +2

    Comanche's were great airplanes............!

    • @itiswhatitis4846
      @itiswhatitis4846 5 лет назад +1

      taos 87529 ... they ARE great airplanes lol. I own one and it is a phenomenal aircraft.

  • @brucesmith4436
    @brucesmith4436 10 лет назад +1

    Nice video! Where did this flight take place?

    • @sailsoar
      @sailsoar  4 года назад

      Bruce Smith Charlie Baker airport north of Memphis, TN.

  • @jjsgarage3634
    @jjsgarage3634 4 года назад +1

    I think the 180 cruises about the same as the 250, and burns less fuel! I would rather trade economy, over climb and payload capability. 👍🏻

    • @MrZrryan2
      @MrZrryan2 4 года назад +3

      the 180 is AT LEAST 20 (more like 23) knots slower than a 250.... I have flown both.... a LOT

  • @LyneisFilm
    @LyneisFilm 8 лет назад

    Nice video. From comment below, I guess this is a Piper Comanche 250. Is that correct?

  • @yahatinda
    @yahatinda 9 лет назад +1

    Just have to wonder why its no longer produced. A 300hp. version would be nice with standard suto. pilot . a Turbo. with ox. tank another option.. It is a pretty airplane.

    • @ryanstockton6590
      @ryanstockton6590 9 лет назад +4

      The Piper factory in Lock Haven actually flooded in 1972 destroying airframes, tools, and parts for the PA-24 Comanche and PA-30/39 Twin Comanche so they decided to discontinue those planes and keep making the PA-28 Arrow and PA-34 Seneca in Florida.

    • @GeneralSirDouglasMcA
      @GeneralSirDouglasMcA 9 лет назад +3

      They actually did have a 300 hp prototype. There were also some 400 hp models produced, but their cruise speeds were low for that kind of horsepower (fuel burn).

    • @ryanstockton6590
      @ryanstockton6590 9 лет назад +2

      GeneralSirDouglasMcA Ya, my uncle's A&P owns a 400 Comanche, he loves it but the fuel burn is ridiculous. Though it's useful load and Rate of Climb make it a very good cross-country plane if you can afford to fill it's 130 gallon tanks. There's a reason only 148 were built and only 85 still fly.

    • @ryanstockton6590
      @ryanstockton6590 9 лет назад +1

      ***** Yes, the Comanche 250 was known as the "Poor Mans Bonanza", it cost around $ 8,000 less than the bonanza ($65,000 today). However it cruised about 20 knots slower than the bonanza. If you would like more information here's the link to my high school presentation on the Comanche: docs.google.com/presentation/d/1liPdZpQzA8E9zgOj1lq-7DaF2d_r2txPlhRVCBX64fo/edit?usp=sharing

  • @Munroav
    @Munroav 10 лет назад

    Is there any sound so we know what is happening??

  • @azspotfree
    @azspotfree 2 года назад

    I don;t think that thing is a Comanche. Looks like an old Cessna 140

  • @lertoraexequiel
    @lertoraexequiel 9 лет назад +1

    Is a 250? I flight a 250 in Argentina!

    • @hookeatup6616
      @hookeatup6616 6 лет назад

      Any difficulty getting aviation fuel 100LL or are you running on autofuel?

  • @onestepbeyond7240
    @onestepbeyond7240 6 лет назад

    this is the same model plane 6 people in AZ. were killed when it crashed on a golf course 4/10/18 rip

    • @Ichibuns
      @Ichibuns 5 лет назад +1

      It is NOT meant to carry 6 adult passengers. The NTSB found that the weight exceeded limits and so did CG. Also, density altitude was high and led to poor performance. Pilot negligence was the cause here. Regulations are made to protect bystanders. Sadly, when they weren't complied with, everybody payed the price. Hopefully, it was a wake-up call for some pilots.

  • @markvancil7990
    @markvancil7990 8 лет назад +1

    Claude, it's a 180, built in 1960. The plane is a lot of fun to fly and nice to look at!