What proof is there that any-G is unsafe? Government and corporations said so... Everything is safe till proven otherwise. The same gov / Corp's that claim "Only a drug can prevent or cure". The same (system) Judge that gave a Round-Up victim $100-m settlement as the FDA claims Round-Up is safe.
"Just imagine dowloading an HD movie in under a second" "Just imagine hitting your download cap in under a second" "Just imagine racking up additional fees for downloads in under a second"
[Writing] will create forgetfulness in the learners’ souls, because they will not use their memories; they will trust to the external written characters and not remember of themselves. The specific which you have discovered is an aid not to memory, but to reminiscence, and you give your disciples not truth, but only the semblance of truth; they will be hearers of many things and will have learned nothing; they will appear to be omniscient and will generally know nothing; they will be tiresome company, having the show of wisdom without the reality.
@@arslongavitabreves 9g will allow cops to implant alcohol-sensors in the skin of habitual DWI offenders, with built-in tazer electrodes connected directly to his hippopotamus. 10g will enable rectum-implanted wireless anti-farting gas-sensors for space-suits, dentist's chairs and elevators. 11g will see the introduction of implanted forehead cameras to ___________?
5G is not intended for browsing through the internet or dowloading movies faster, but for autonomous driving and internet of things, that is, comunication between machines.
Sagittarius Well mostly because humans won't block the signal. It can still reach your device if you're holding it, but not if you're, say, in a forest or something.
And you think that while the signal reaches the device, it doesn't reach you at the same time? Your body keeps being smash with signals everywhere, everyday... It is so dangerous.
Well we can absorb visible light and IR too, don't we? When it's sunny there is around 1000 W/m^2, which is a few million times higher than radiation from 4G, 5G, Wifi etc. They also have around a thousand times higher frequency (hundreds of THz).
"Just imagine getting cancer" "Just imagine Damaging your DNA" "Just imagine being tracked 24/7" "just imagine corporate interests over privacy and health" "Just imagine using a technology with no studies done on the dangers"
Imagine a massive increase in Alzheimer and neurological diseases..A growing number of people who can not take care of them self anymore.. What a "wonderful" world ....... All for faster download, without any safety tested for the biological effects. People who wants this technology surely are not interested in plants, animals, insects, biodiversity, climate or the planet!. If they was they would read about the massive amount of warnings from scientists/doctors.. www.naturalscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/2015-06-22-WFNS-Factsheet-Interview-with-Barrie-Trower-english-WEB-.pdf
@@tooooove Imagine not understanding that higher frequencies that cannot penetrate objects means this technology is actually safer than any of the previous data protocols (which, really, isn't saying much to begin with). Previous cellular services could travel through rain and obstacles (like your skull) but this technology is at a much higher frequency so it cannot travel through rain and obstacles (like your skull). These high frequency waves are so low power that they have minuscule to no impact on your health. If you *really* want to talk about carcinogens, let's talk about highly processed foods and engine exhaust.
Well, it'll use more antennas, and that will make ir more expensive due to licensing costs and whatnot, but apart from that, i dont see why it would be a whole lot prcier than current tech.
Spyrotechnics TBH Sprint has a good idea. They want to use really high carrier Aggregation for higher speeds, they even have the spectrum for it. And it makes sense, carrier Aggregation is cheaper, faster and getting faster. As more carriers implement 5G a lot of device will be moving off to 5G opening up spectrum for 4G, something Sprint can use. All they need is bakchaul.
Yes and no. The frequency is less than that of visible light, the light that surrounds us and so it's less energetic. The problem comes from intensity. Let's say you have a cell tower that sends out radiation with 500 Hz. The further you are from it the less intense it is, but the frequency is independent of distance. 5G technology will have very high intensity because it will be on every corner down the street. Adding to that microwaves are absorbed by H2O (aka all living things) and so you have something that could be harmful.
Given the comments against 5G on this video I can say it does NOT gel with your likes. I've seen it on most official narrative video. Clearly controlled to your favor.
Because it's not just about speed. It's about call quality and much more modernisation about which we will know only after we actually get to use it and as far as health is concerned we already interact with tons of cancer inducers and this tech is going to be another simple addition to it.
This thing is very dangerous guys. They are not telling us their real purpose of this thing. We should avoid it while we can. Or better yet, before the whole A.I and the internet of things get out of control.
I'm with you! If I see a 5G tower anywhere near my neighborhood, I'm going to vandalize it. I suggest everyone do the same! They can't force these 5G towers on us if we all band together and refuse to have them setup! - Just say no!
This is sick. And no not in a good way. 5G will be the end of us watch. Cell phone towers placed on top businesses and near homes have already reported earlier in age cancer diagnosis as well as the older folks too. A guy knew there was towers on his building and sure enough the pole right before entering the space with all the wire and antennas will say "danger high radio frequency" and when he opens the door you see a shit ton of wires and transmitters. The owner was diagnosed with cancer and his 25 year old son who he had been helping out for a year also was diagnosed with cancer. These things aren't safe. And 5G will kill us. Smh
Turito Bassu maybe the massive ball of radiation that is strong enough to burn skin, if you actually believe these "scientifically proven" theories about how radio frequency waves cause cancer you need to do some research. The sun produces much more radiation in a minute than your phone would in its whole lifespan
KayaR it's the frequencies at which they are at that is dangerous. And while you may think the sun is giving off more radiation that's where mainstream science would have one believe that. But I have done my research as well and it has turned up things that I'm not quite sure you're aware of because if you were you would have a different out look this topic. There is definitely dangerous amounts of radiation being emitted daily and the chem trails are also causing damage so we're being hit from all sides here. When people get cancer they'll think it was natural and was going to happen. And again that's what they want you to believe so that no one ever questions why has the cancer found in patients risen instead of fallen? They have a multi billion dollar industry the pharmaceutical mobsters they don't want to cure all the cancer or admit there's been a cure found. Because they want to depopulate the earth. If you don't believe me then do research. Like why do all the leaders meet at secret meetings? Or why were the stone tablets, known as the Georgia guidestones, erected? Did you know it's first rule or law is to maintain humanity under 500,000,000 people? That's killing off nearly the entire human population. Now before you comment things like "radio frequency doesn't cause cancer" actually look at what the findings are and you'll see that they CAN cause cancer amongst other biological health issues.
Turito Bassu well you'd be wrong to think that but I'm sure I won't change your mind. Do some research on them. Maybe you'll find the rich fucks who put them up for laughs and ask them why? There's so much that goes on that the public is made aware of, and if it wasn't a stunt for laughs then what was it for?
NOTE: read the entire comment before replying, thanks There is a reason its called ”none ionizing radiation”. Using ur method of thinking, i would get cancer from simply cooking food as i expose myself to massive amounts of heat radiation from the stove. Or if im sitting beside a fire. As for the energy absorbed from none ionizing radiation, yes it can be dangerouse. But it all depends on strength and wave length. I could blast u with 50 Ghz wifi for 1h at -38 D/m2 of power and u would be fine, or i could blast u with 1h of micro(ironically micro waves arent that ”micro” in length but whatever that isnt the point) wave radiation(also none ionizing) and it would melt ur face off.Yet the wifi 50 Ghz was wayy wayyy higher energy in terms of wave length. The wave energy wifi, 5G, radio.. etc give off are neglegable in power, truly miniscule. An army of engneers have tried to come up with ways to get ”free energy” by turning radio wave energy in the air(from wifi, radio.. etc) to electrical energy for years. Yet failed miserably as the output was in the micro to mili volt range, AKA minimal amounts of actual power going though the air. So no, these radiation ammiters wont kill/give us cancer. Stop the nonesense
@@AceixSmart Cancer in humans. Death in bees and other insects, which will destroy the food web. And all so moronic phone zombies can consume more data and unscrupulous corporations can make more money. Yay. We really are turning into the fat fucks in Wall-E.
I am not far off that qual, but even I do not know the long term effects of high power higher Ghz frequencies, I do know it will effect the cells in our bodies, the question is will it be enough to cause damage. Seems to me not enough testing has been conducted on this technology.
You don't need to have a PhD in order to have intelligent thought..Another lie that has been force fed to the world.All humans are intelligent and multidimensional... thus.. the reason for the eventual shut down if the NWO has it's way, regarding, this technology.Smart city.Smart people.Although won't be so smart in reality as it will be game over for the humans as we know it...
@Hernando Malinche That would make 5G between 1 and 10mm wavelength, I take it you are just using the eV @ wavelength for that calculation?. , so by your theory you could stick your head in a microwave oven since that has even less eV? ) lol. No in order to determine safety you need to look at the output power from the transmitter, in the case of 5G since it is higher frequency, it is also more directional/focused, therefore you need many closer proximity transmitters, that's why there is so many people having doubts on 5G's safety.
@@rhythm2mysoul. Do you take your car to be fixed by the dentist?. Yes quals do not mean intelligence, but they do mean you know more about a subject than someone who hasn't studied in that area.
@Hernando Malinche I am well aware of what Hz means, you miss my point, your comparison using eV is just plain wrong. Hence the microwave example. Neither did I say it gives you cancer(though Synchrotron radiation has been proved to cause cancer), it will make your head hot! Microwaves work at 2.4GHz, that has a lower eV than 'colour', yet is able to vibrate the molocules due to the 100 or so watts of radio power. So your theory on 5g safety is just wrong as you did not take transmitter power into account. Did you know people have been killed standing too close to high power VHF radio transmitters? As we increase frequency, we are more able to hit the resonant frequency of smaller structures so a 1mm wavelength will vibrate anything in your body with dimensions approximating 1mm. No scientist will disagree with what I have said, the only question is how much damage vs. power it will do to your body over a prolonged time period.
just imagine living in a microwave . .... but as long as someone gets faster WiFi it's all good....... Well depopulation is an actual truth and behold this is the way it begins
And there's not a damn thing you or I can do to stop it. Nada, Nuttin. Ziltch.. Live life to your fullest. Enjoy everyday you have left on this earth. If Not 5G, They'd kill us all another way. It's a no win situation. U can deal with it. Or u can just blow your brains out now and get it over with.
No it's not the same as living in microwave. You are really extremally stupid if you think so. I will try to explain it like for kids in kindergarten: Imagine you are inside a car. Now you are getting hit by housefiles one by one, lets say the housefly hit your car with speed similar to 0.1km/h, and it happens 1000 times. Now imagine that you got hit by car that was moving with speed like 100km/h. Do you see the difference? The same applies to wifi and microwave. The router emits the waves with power similar the 0.1W, while the microwave emits the waves with power higher than 1000W. If the waves are on the same frequency it doesn't mean they will blow your brain or something similar.
@@morsiskoPC I doubt he actually meant it literally. Even if he did the health concerns are still there. Oh and calling someone "extremely stupid" doesn't exactly make you sound clever yourself.
@@jehoma That call doesn't make me sound clever, however another part of the message acually does, at least smarter than the foilhead that talks bullshits
Unfortunately if it can structurally change our DNA? What do you think its doing to the trees and clouds. Explains why the weather is starting to go crazy worldwide. The 5G switches are happening now.
It won't hurt you. 5G reaches a maximum frequency of 95Ghz. X-rays (known to be harmful in the long run) reach a minimum of 30 petahertz (3×10^16 Hz). If it is harmful why is it being implemented in so many cites around the world? Do your research if you don't trust something.
no. 1G is analogue. 2G is GSM and basically had no real data capability (you had to call a dial-up service). 2.5G is GPRS 2.6 or 2.75 EDGE is an evolution of GPRS basically bundling together several GPRS carriers (I believe it was 4xGPRS).
Bollocks my microwave is a stupid amount more powerful and works in the range of most 2G/3G stuff as it's closer to the resonant frequency of water, which is how it cooks.
Because 4G cannot handle the amount of data traffic anymore. Too many people watching too many videos, too many emails, uploading too many high resolution photos to facebook..... and you're contributing solely based on the data that was transferred from your comment.
@@444brandy we wont get cancer from 5G radiation, it only has a freaquency of a microwave, the radiation is not even ionize or powerful enough to mutate out cells, visible light has more radiation freaquency than 5G, Sun emits ultraviolet
@@woodypigeon oh, ya - those are amazing videos when juuls explodes in peoples pockets and burn them with the flaming lithium battery ! There mom told them smoking was bad for their health. But seriously, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3719292/ The tiny amount of 1.0 mg/kg B.W. of nicotine is destructive to male fertility and bad news, destroys sex drive too... :-(
*finnaly" ISN'T.A.WORD. SMDH Try "finally". How are you supposedly a grown adult but have no knowledge of BASIC ENGLISH!!??? You're a disgrace...and largely part of societies ruination/demise. Thanks
2 concerns: Wouldn't beam forming reveal the exact location of every device in the network? (privacy issue?) What about coverage? needing exponential amount of antennas impact this? Even 4G struggles having much longer wavelength...
I was thinking the same thing. 6GHZ signals get stopped by an obstructions like leaves and humidity. I don't see them being feasible for wide-scale data transmission.
mateyko555 they are planning to use 26GHz, which is where A LOT of spectrum is available, which allows for super high speed communication. Everything below 6GHz is very much taken already. Obviously below 500Mhz the spectrum is useless for internet communication :p
@Hernando Malinche The frequency doesn't play a big role. What's relevant is the field intensity of the frequency since it's possible to cause harm with any frequency if the field intensity is high enough, which is the case for 5G.
@@ChamGee How is it, exactly? I doubt you're exposed to kilowatts of energy all at once from 5G. The signal to your phone is a few watts at best, it's not constant either so there is no danger of cooking from 5G.
@@Slenderman63323 ONE 5G transmitter will pass the safety tests... but walking in cities, you'll be flooded with dozens of towers blasting you with every step... Something like this, but below your ability to feel it: ruclips.net/video/J1w4g2vr7B4/видео.html
@@Gongolongo - Also, it should be noted that 5G is not a frequency band - it is a network architecture. It will employ several existing technologies and existing frequency bands. Some of the new higher frequency bands will be new to the mobile application - but, have been in use for many years in fixed wireless and satellite applications. There isn't really anything novel about 5G, except the way the different pieces are being put together. The concern about the use of higher frequencies is particularly misplaced as these will mostly be reflected, rather than absorbed by human tissue. Chill out folks!
@Henry the meme machine Quit it with these "visible lights have higher frequencies" comments. Visible light is created naturally these frequencies aren't. It doesn't make sense to compare the two.
Wait. So you're saying trees & rain can "absorb" the signal... And, we're just supposed to ignore the obvious implications for our actual bodies? Sign me up! 😐
I don't think the trees or rain are damaged by absorbing the electromagnetic radiation... they absorb solar radiation just fine, heck they die without it..... the absorption is bad for the user that wanted to receive the data and didn't get it... The raindrop does not give a shit, and the plants don't care about your service either....
What do people do that don't want all that 4g is fine 12 mbp is enough for me but I feel like I will be forced to have it just because of the overhaul unifying communication.
the internet of things = the surveillance of EVERYTHING,not to mention weaponized millimeter waves. Oh gee I cant wait to download movies in under a second
It won't hurt you. 5G reaches a maximum frequency of 95Ghz. X-rays (known to be harmful in the long run) reach a minimum of 30 petahertz (3×10^16 Hz). If it is harmful why is it being implemented in so many cites around the world? Do your research if you don't trust something.
Just imagine that broadband radiation cooking your sperm into mutant territory. Just imagine that signal screwing with people's minds... Turning them into homicidal sociopaths. Imagine... If you would... THE WALKING DEAD!!! Brought to you by Sprint!
The wavelengths of 5g radiowaves are still less powerful than this of light meaning that you are more likely to die of standing outside than in a 5g signal
Millimeter waves are electromagnetic (radio) waves typically defined to lie within the frequency range of 30-300 GHz. The microwave band is just below the millimeter-wave band and is typically defined to cover the 3-30-GHz range
@@tommywaltz400 That's a good question. Not sure if anyone really knows, because for some reason, a bunch of smartass namecallers don't want to allow the conversation.
@@unacceptableonanon2655 okay, here you go. 5g won't have any great affect on health as the radiation isn't at a level that is Ionizing like UV rays. Learn basic physics and you'll understand this.
how the hell can radio waves have extremely high Gigahertz frequencies? radio waves are at the beginning of the Electromagnetic spectrum and have the highest wavelength, hence lowest frequency!
I believe that they will be using mmwaves, its basically an untouched section of the spectrum, down side it about 2-10 homes would have a transmitter out in front of it.
It won't, the frequency range is non-ionizing, it'll only heat tissue at extreme power levels, similar to a microwave oven. Fun fact: your cellphone can only produce 2 watts of RF power Max
@Duke Hugh Johnson no, I described a person's action to label. A label is "a classifying phrase or name applied to a person or thing, especially one that is inaccurate or restrictive.
*Becomes concerned about 5g. Realizes that he has 4g which could be used to do the same thing and that ppl freak out literally everytime new tech comes out*
Does the millimeter wave frequencies penetrate skin? Since the 28-39GHz signal can get blocked by anything, does that mean it absorbs it, or is it just to weak to absorb?
@@TheGreatBackUpVIDEOS It would better if the government wasn't trying to control the weather and desiccating our environment... vermontindependent.net/california-burning-ground-zero-for-us-geoengineering-our-geoengineering-age-essay-10/ www.5gspaceappeal.org/ www.stopbitburning.com/ Stop Agenda 21 everyone!
+Stetson Graham 5G is used as a weapon in the military "ADS (Active Denial System) Look into it, it's worth consideration- im checking it out atm, I personally do want this tech harming my children- just imagine what effect they'll have on newborns and fetuses (e.g. pregnant women have been told not to use the microwave since it can harm their baby- just imagine the effects 5G will have along with citywide Wi-Fi)
Stetson Graham ~ And this makes what your 19th 20th attempt to placate or derail? Don't bother taking time to answer I see you for what you are, move on to your next interjection.
I'm two years late but: Time and frequency division multiple acces (T/FDMA) one transmits at a time, per channel, either server or subscriber. The role of TX/RX switches many times a second
Its not new using the mm band, its just expensive and the signals are very directional easily blocked., all the small numerous 5g base stations need to be networked together too, so a massive expensive fiber network needs to installed to handle the bandwidth demand. Also not a good idea to have the population be blasted all day with 10~100Ghz signals as they will be absorbed by you're body, and the transmitters are in contact with you. Mobile devices were never intended to watch HD movies and move large amounts of data, as 1 the screes are too small, damage you're eye sight with the blue light, bad posture cause injury, they promote unsocial behavior, they are a distraction. They are for convenience, not a replacement for traditional desktop computer and or TV screen.
Then again, would you still be content with a whopping 640kb memory? ;-) My main problem is the amount of resources being poured into this, just so that people can share a 4K^H^H32K video of their dog taking a shit, when there are so much better ways to use all these peoples know-how. The iphone 7 will not become something people will remember in a 1000 years, but we still look at the pyramids after more than 10.000 years while that was done with so little resources in comparison. So much potential is wasted. We could be on Mars or have fusion power, but no... we, the people, prefer an iphone. I hate this world.
@@mapi5032 That's the same argument I use about BTC sticking with 1MB / 1024KB blocks! And they're talking about LOWERING it even more? MORONS / actually they're just evil and don't wish BTC to take off, that's what should get worldwide adoption NOT 5G! Good thing there's Bitcoin Cash though so they can't stop us now getting worldwide adoption because we increase the blocks to the necessary sizes to enable worldwide massive adoption! :D If / when we achieve it and eliminate the federal reserve these criminals that print free money will be no more and they won't be able to enact this kind of shit against us nor all the other evil they do.
People should be more aware about the downsides and harms of the this technology too, a few things i am aware about are that it's starting to give rise to cutting out trees and plants to make way for the transmission frequencies and also the wireless transmissions are so powerful that a multitude of them can cause health issues to not only the human body but to all living organisms. I request everyone to research more and be aware.
SkullKing11841 when you want to download 64K (not 4K) movies (3D format or better, VR-Format of course) in under a second whilst downloading a retro game like GTA V (yes on your mobile device) in under 1 second, then you need 6G
Ooooh new technology! Its faster??? OOooooooh gimme gimme gimme! I won't question anything. I'm sure you have it all figured out, Att, Verizon, TMobile, etc. I trust tech companies. They would NEVER hurt me!
That signal switching is huge. The reason all these ideas are built up and maybe not efficient is because of regulation. That's changing. People and small companies will figure this out.
@@adilahmed2623 are you insane? Shame on you for writing crap like that. Why on earth telecom companies would kill people, who are their own customers??? Maybe to never have revenue themselfs?
@@artursvancans9702 At first every customer, killed by rf exposure is no more cell phone subscription customer. 2-nd major part of the customers recieve about the same exposure, so 1 dead today can mean million tomorror. 3-rd do cellops want to ruin their business by killing people (and also business reputation ) Research finished.
@@volodumurkalunyak4651 Do some research on Israel and their nefafrious plans to have the world all to themselves and then get back to us. FYI 5G is banned in Israel. That should give you a small clue.
Robin loves Jesus Oh I’m sure you can but not all of us can when our life’s work depends on fastest rates of information transfer. Your comment drips with condescension..
You people are so scared of improved technology that it apparently becomes a violation of your very rights. It's literally just faster speed. If they didn't say anything, none of you would be talking about this.
Great video, but the comment section is full of people who don't know anything about anything. Only a couple of smart comments here and there, but mostly it's scared off people making irrational statements about the technology or something said in the video twisted to sound evil af.
That's a lie. The military has been using it as a weapon for a long time. Look up Active Denial System. You've probably experienced millimeter waves at the airport getting a full-body scan.
@@nokomismn9685 What is the logic? Milimeter waves are also in use for example in communication with satellites, but satellites aren't part of 5G. Fact that every tree is a plant does not mean that every plant is a tree.
Just imagine it works on the same wavelength of our brains?no standards,no testing n no regulations,does anyone see any problems?of course not the just want it faster n more gigs n screw their health
Today an Engineer of a mobile tower himself said that even 4g is harmful and 5g is way harmful and he should not be saying these as a company employee but we deserve to know the truth.
It is comforting to know that the 5G towers on light poles right next to homes and apartment windows put out 5,750 times more radiation than 4G phones.
This doesn't seem like everything we need to know. What tests are being done to determine the effect on biological organisms?
what biological effects are there? how stupid are you?
people are working on it www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29402696
What proof is there that any-G is unsafe? Government and corporations said so... Everything is safe till proven otherwise. The same gov / Corp's that claim "Only a drug can prevent or cure". The same (system) Judge that gave a Round-Up victim $100-m settlement as the FDA claims Round-Up is safe.
Boi the sun does more damage than 5g.
@@k1awesomeness Since when is it stupid to look for more information??
"Just imagine dowloading an HD movie in under a second"
"Just imagine hitting your download cap in under a second"
"Just imagine racking up additional fees for downloads in under a second"
oops just hit my 1gb data limit in 1.6 seconds
[Writing] will create forgetfulness in the learners’ souls, because they
will not use their memories; they will trust to the external written
characters and not remember of themselves. The specific which you have
discovered is an aid not to memory, but to reminiscence, and you give
your disciples not truth, but only the semblance of truth; they will be
hearers of many things and will have learned nothing; they will appear
to be omniscient and will generally know nothing; they will be tiresome
company, having the show of wisdom without the reality.
Nbbn bssafccc
Bcvb
BBB b B.B. B.B. has. C. Bang
Al Eks vhngnh
Hopefully by the time carriers add support for 5g, they'll also increase their data limits
6G: Teleportation
justsnappy it will probably create new diseases to
Loss of organs maybe. We shouldnt be messing with that until we're more advanced. But we still have Trump so we arent even close yet.
7G will let us look into youtube poster's living rooms.
8G is time travel
@@arslongavitabreves 9g will allow cops to implant alcohol-sensors in the skin of habitual DWI offenders, with built-in tazer electrodes connected directly to his hippopotamus.
10g will enable rectum-implanted wireless anti-farting gas-sensors for space-suits, dentist's chairs and elevators.
11g will see the introduction of implanted forehead cameras to ___________?
What exactly was wrong with 4G??? How fast do we need the internet to be???
5G is not intended for browsing through the internet or dowloading movies faster, but for autonomous driving and internet of things, that is, comunication between machines.
Ignacio T well said
We need it drop dead fast.
By 2023 it is estimated that we will use 18x more data browsing the web so we do need faster speeds to keep up with our heavy internet usage
5G Crowd Control ruclips.net/video/eTQtujBq5fE/видео.html
absorbed by plants and rain, why you didn't mention humans since we do have water in our bodies like plants and obviously rain
Sagittarius Well mostly because humans won't block the signal. It can still reach your device if you're holding it, but not if you're, say, in a forest or something.
And you think that while the signal reaches the device, it doesn't reach you at the same time? Your body keeps being smash with signals everywhere, everyday... It is so dangerous.
People like to think we’re biologically superior to nature. News flash, we aren’t, and what harms plants and animals has the potential to harm humans
Well we can absorb visible light and IR too, don't we? When it's sunny there is around 1000 W/m^2, which is a few million times higher than radiation from 4G, 5G, Wifi etc. They also have around a thousand times higher frequency (hundreds of THz).
We asbrorb light to you know actually be visible
Texting was available long before 2G, it was called a pager.
Yeah and HOW THE FUCK did this work? Yeah, with mobile networks.
Oscar Santana nah I used mail.
If you want to use a pager like they did in the 90s, go right ahead. Enjoy! 👋
2g has been out. it finally reaches the public eye. like 5g. it not new but it's "new to us"
LOL at OP. Funny but true!
i thought 4G towers already used beamforming.
Khoi Le ...say that in English
Come on dad, you said if i lost the bet you'd only do this for 1 day, this has to stop.
Feel Team Six umm is he your son?
4G LTE -A uses mimo but is 800mhz low frequency long range but slow speed
"Just imagine getting cancer"
"Just imagine Damaging your DNA"
"Just imagine being tracked 24/7"
"just imagine corporate interests over privacy and health"
"Just imagine using a technology with no studies done on the dangers"
Imagine a massive increase in Alzheimer and neurological diseases..A growing number of people who can not take care of them self anymore.. What a "wonderful" world ....... All for faster download, without any safety tested for the biological effects. People who wants this technology surely are not interested in plants, animals, insects, biodiversity, climate or the planet!. If they was they would read about the massive amount of warnings from scientists/doctors.. www.naturalscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/2015-06-22-WFNS-Factsheet-Interview-with-Barrie-Trower-english-WEB-.pdf
@@tooooove Imagine not understanding that higher frequencies that cannot penetrate objects means this technology is actually safer than any of the previous data protocols (which, really, isn't saying much to begin with).
Previous cellular services could travel through rain and obstacles (like your skull) but this technology is at a much higher frequency so it cannot travel through rain and obstacles (like your skull).
These high frequency waves are so low power that they have minuscule to no impact on your health. If you *really* want to talk about carcinogens, let's talk about highly processed foods and engine exhaust.
“Just imagine that you’re wrong”
@@BunkerSquirrel higher frequencies require higher power to travel the same distance as lower frequencies.
@@virajmaheshwar9135 just imagine if you are wrong.
This is going to be one hell of an expensive implementation.
Well, it'll use more antennas, and that will make ir more expensive due to licensing costs and whatnot, but apart from that, i dont see why it would be a whole lot prcier than current tech.
Spyrotechnics TBH Sprint has a good idea. They want to use really high carrier Aggregation for higher speeds, they even have the spectrum for it. And it makes sense, carrier Aggregation is cheaper, faster and getting faster. As more carriers implement 5G a lot of device will be moving off to 5G opening up spectrum for 4G, something Sprint can use. All they need is bakchaul.
Spyrotechnics better become cheaper. Or no one will buy it
Horulema Miku ッ exactly
No it won't be cheaper not even close, you believe lies and liars
But isn't it possible that the frequency used for 5G could possibly propose a health risk?
LapseOfApathy no.
Not more than radio frequency
@@callmeastaire5700 Jeez, you are such a shill. Are you part of the CIA troll squad?
Yes and no. The frequency is less than that of visible light, the light that surrounds us and so it's less energetic.
The problem comes from intensity. Let's say you have a cell tower that sends out radiation with 500 Hz. The further you are from it the less intense it is, but the frequency is independent of distance.
5G technology will have very high intensity because it will be on every corner down the street. Adding to that microwaves are absorbed by H2O (aka all living things) and so you have something that could be harmful.
It can kill. A test between 4 towers in Sweden downed a flock of birds. Basically they fell dead out of the sky.
"Scientists dont even know what it is" HA I FEEL SAFE NOW
__ Government Plan __
>> Set up 5G grid all over the country.
>> Question health effects.
>> Oops.
Maybe because it doesn't exist yet?
I really wanna like 5g just to make you mad
Nourios it does tho there are already phones out that have 5g capabilities like the s10
@@imodium438 Your right. This is their silent war (WWIII) to kill us off. People are already dying in California from 5G.
“Experts can’t tell us what 5G is because they don’t really know” 🚶🏼ok I’m out of here
aight imma head out
@jess jesse youre a dumbass
ShabbyFrame why would you disrespect him, he never disrespected you?
hahaha
Maybe she meant all the rules have not been defined. Work in progress..🤷🏽♂️
Given the comments against 5G on this video I can say it does NOT gel with your likes. I've seen it on most official narrative video. Clearly controlled to your favor.
True we've seen lots of that manipulation.
why do I need this when my internet/wifi already provides such speeds?
Outlier Z because it can be faster.
@@callmeastaire5700 how does my wifi connected to fiber come up lacking in speed?
Outlier Z how do I know about your WiFi?
Wired will always beat wireless in terms of speed.
Because it's not just about speed. It's about call quality and much more modernisation about which we will know only after we actually get to use it and as far as health is concerned we already interact with tons of cancer inducers and this tech is going to be another simple addition to it.
This thing is very dangerous guys. They are not telling us their real purpose of this thing. We should avoid it while we can. Or better yet, before the whole A.I and the internet of things get out of control.
I'm with you! If I see a 5G tower anywhere near my neighborhood, I'm going to vandalize it. I suggest everyone do the same! They can't force these 5G towers on us if we all band together and refuse to have them setup! - Just say no!
Adams Julien shut the fuck up so you’re saying that scientists wasted all their years of university?
Lmao!
The letters IoT appear in "Idiot".
Thatll be the day
1:00 5 Technologies supportive of 5G network:
_1) _*_Millimeter Waves_*_ -- __1:12_
_2) _*_Small Cell_*_ -- __2:02_
_3) _*_Massive MIMO_*_ -- __2:46_
_4) _*_Beamforming_*_ -- __3:19_
_5) _*_Full Duplex_*_ -- __4:21_
These animations are surprisingly informative without sacrificing too much for simplification.
This is sick. And no not in a good way. 5G will be the end of us watch. Cell phone towers placed on top businesses and near homes have already reported earlier in age cancer diagnosis as well as the older folks too. A guy knew there was towers on his building and sure enough the pole right before entering the space with all the wire and antennas will say "danger high radio frequency" and when he opens the door you see a shit ton of wires and transmitters. The owner was diagnosed with cancer and his 25 year old son who he had been helping out for a year also was diagnosed with cancer. These things aren't safe. And 5G will kill us. Smh
Radio waves dont cause cancer
Turito Bassu maybe the massive ball of radiation that is strong enough to burn skin, if you actually believe these "scientifically proven" theories about how radio frequency waves cause cancer you need to do some research. The sun produces much more radiation in a minute than your phone would in its whole lifespan
KayaR it's the frequencies at which they are at that is dangerous. And while you may think the sun is giving off more radiation that's where mainstream science would have one believe that. But I have done my research as well and it has turned up things that I'm not quite sure you're aware of because if you were you would have a different out look this topic. There is definitely dangerous amounts of radiation being emitted daily and the chem trails are also causing damage so we're being hit from all sides here. When people get cancer they'll think it was natural and was going to happen. And again that's what they want you to believe so that no one ever questions why has the cancer found in patients risen instead of fallen? They have a multi billion dollar industry the pharmaceutical mobsters they don't want to cure all the cancer or admit there's been a cure found. Because they want to depopulate the earth. If you don't believe me then do research. Like why do all the leaders meet at secret meetings? Or why were the stone tablets, known as the Georgia guidestones, erected? Did you know it's first rule or law is to maintain humanity under 500,000,000 people? That's killing off nearly the entire human population. Now before you comment things like "radio frequency doesn't cause cancer" actually look at what the findings are and you'll see that they CAN cause cancer amongst other biological health issues.
Turito Bassu well you'd be wrong to think that but I'm sure I won't change your mind. Do some research on them. Maybe you'll find the rich fucks who put them up for laughs and ask them why? There's so much that goes on that the public is made aware of, and if it wasn't a stunt for laughs then what was it for?
NOTE: read the entire comment before replying, thanks
There is a reason its called ”none ionizing radiation”. Using ur method of thinking, i would get cancer from simply cooking food as i expose myself to massive amounts of heat radiation from the stove. Or if im sitting beside a fire.
As for the energy absorbed from none ionizing radiation, yes it can be dangerouse. But it all depends on strength and wave length. I could blast u with 50 Ghz wifi for 1h at -38 D/m2 of power and u would be fine, or i could blast u with 1h of micro(ironically micro waves arent that ”micro” in length but whatever that isnt the point) wave radiation(also none ionizing) and it would melt ur face off.Yet the wifi 50 Ghz was wayy wayyy higher energy in terms of wave length.
The wave energy wifi, 5G, radio.. etc give off are neglegable in power, truly miniscule. An army of engneers have tried to come up with ways to get ”free energy” by turning radio wave energy in the air(from wifi, radio.. etc) to electrical energy for years. Yet failed miserably as the output was in the micro to mili volt range, AKA minimal amounts of actual power going though the air.
So no, these radiation ammiters wont kill/give us cancer. Stop the nonesense
Wrong Title: Should have been "Everything The Powers That Be Want You to Know About 5G"
Jim Shaw Perfect comment. It is going to have horrific consequences on all living creatures for no good reason.
@@sjin8896 really? explain yourself
@@AceixSmart Cancer in humans. Death in bees and other insects, which will destroy the food web. And all so moronic phone zombies can consume more data and unscrupulous corporations can make more money. Yay. We really are turning into the fat fucks in Wall-E.
@@whome3940 there's no evidence that it will do any of those things.
Who Me Brainwashing did you really well, that shit was there before your dumbass was even born so quit complaining, you moron.
All of the commentors seem to have PhD in telecommunication engineering
I am not far off that qual, but even I do not know the long term effects of high power higher Ghz frequencies, I do know it will effect the cells in our bodies, the question is will it be enough to cause damage. Seems to me not enough testing has been conducted on this technology.
You don't need to have a PhD in order to have intelligent thought..Another lie that has been force fed to the world.All humans are intelligent and multidimensional...
thus.. the reason for the eventual shut down if the NWO has it's way, regarding, this technology.Smart city.Smart people.Although won't be so smart in reality as it will be game over for the humans as we know it...
@Hernando Malinche
That would make 5G between 1 and 10mm wavelength, I take it you are just using the eV @ wavelength for that calculation?.
, so by your theory you could stick your head in a microwave oven since that has even less eV? ) lol.
No in order to determine safety you need to look at the output power from the transmitter, in the case of 5G since it is higher frequency, it is also more directional/focused, therefore you need many closer proximity transmitters, that's why there is so many people having doubts on 5G's safety.
@@rhythm2mysoul. Do you take your car to be fixed by the dentist?.
Yes quals do not mean intelligence, but they do mean you know more about a subject than someone who hasn't studied in that area.
@Hernando Malinche I am well aware of what Hz means, you miss my point, your comparison using eV is just plain wrong. Hence the microwave example. Neither did I say it gives you cancer(though Synchrotron radiation has been proved to cause cancer), it will make your head hot!
Microwaves work at 2.4GHz, that has a lower eV than 'colour', yet is able to vibrate the molocules due to the 100 or so watts of radio power. So your theory on 5g safety is just wrong as you did not take transmitter power into account.
Did you know people have been killed standing too close to high power VHF radio transmitters?
As we increase frequency, we are more able to hit the resonant frequency of smaller structures so a 1mm wavelength will vibrate anything in your body with dimensions approximating 1mm.
No scientist will disagree with what I have said, the only question is how much damage vs. power it will do to your body over a prolonged time period.
just imagine living in a microwave . .... but as long as someone gets faster WiFi it's all good....... Well depopulation is an actual truth and behold this is the way it begins
And there's not a damn thing you or I can do to stop it. Nada, Nuttin. Ziltch.. Live life to your fullest. Enjoy everyday you have left on this earth. If Not 5G, They'd kill us all another way. It's a no win situation. U can deal with it. Or u can just blow your brains out now and get it over with.
Noi you fucking moron
No it's not the same as living in microwave. You are really extremally stupid if you think so.
I will try to explain it like for kids in kindergarten:
Imagine you are inside a car. Now you are getting hit by housefiles one by one, lets say the housefly hit your car with speed similar to 0.1km/h, and it happens 1000 times.
Now imagine that you got hit by car that was moving with speed like 100km/h. Do you see the difference?
The same applies to wifi and microwave. The router emits the waves with power similar the 0.1W, while the microwave emits the waves with power higher than 1000W.
If the waves are on the same frequency it doesn't mean they will blow your brain or something similar.
@@morsiskoPC I doubt he actually meant it literally. Even if he did the health concerns are still there. Oh and calling someone "extremely stupid" doesn't exactly make you sound clever yourself.
@@jehoma That call doesn't make me sound clever, however another part of the message acually does, at least smarter than the foilhead that talks bullshits
No thanks 4G is my homie
IDGAFWA BGTSAM exactly
4G is horrible too. 5G is definitely worse!
First off learn what 5g and 4g really is.
ruclips.net/video/2nsEAw_SirQ/видео.html
Fucck 5G he a bitch
@@jehoma then why bother having an acct on here?
Ha look at the trees and clouds trynna save us by asorbing it :'(((
Oooh boy! I don't know about all this. 😰
God’s trying to save us
Unfortunately if it can structurally change our DNA?
What do you think its doing to the trees and clouds. Explains why the weather is starting to go crazy worldwide. The 5G switches are happening now.
It won't hurt you. 5G reaches a maximum frequency of 95Ghz. X-rays (known to be harmful in the long run) reach a minimum of 30 petahertz (3×10^16 Hz). If it is harmful why is it being implemented in so many cites around the world? Do your research if you don't trust something.
@Steffsh I highly suggest you watch Ian Ferguson channel.
He is a line worker installing these things. You might change your mind.
Headache/migraines, brain fog, depression/anxiety, HAIR LOSS, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, LOSS OF SMELL AND TASTE, coughing, runny/stuffy nose, tachycardia/POTs, chest pain, fatigue, seizures/tremors, vision disturbances, palsies, tinnitus, shortness of breath, muscle and joint aches, skin rash, immune cell activation, changes to bone marrow and white blood cells, changes in menstruation, lung scarring/coughing, atrophy of saliva glands leading to sore/dry throat, numbness, tingling, nerve pain, hair loss...
= 5mm radiation exposure symptoms
= “Long Covid” symptoms
GPRS is 2g right? So technically 2g brought us the internet.
Nope, GPRS is 2.5g. And GPRS is an extension of 2g, not part of it.
no GPRS is 1G. EDGE is 2G.
no. 1G is analogue.
2G is GSM and basically had no real data capability (you had to call a dial-up service).
2.5G is GPRS
2.6 or 2.75 EDGE is an evolution of GPRS basically bundling together several GPRS carriers (I believe it was 4xGPRS).
jmmo20 love your answer, it seems that you learned Telecommunications at school :D
w4rell I'm old enough to have lived through all of those Gs
Imagine your microwave is operating with the door open - that’s 5G.
Bollocks my microwave is a stupid amount more powerful and works in the range of most 2G/3G stuff as it's closer to the resonant frequency of water, which is how it cooks.
Piplodocus sorry, I meant military grade directed-energy weapon.
Microwaves don’t emit radiation like we think. It’s not harmful - Neil Degrasse Tyson
@@dowjoe1208 , NEIL DEFRASSE IS AN IDIOT!
That is literally true. 5g waves are right around the lower side of microwaves.
We have 4g in 3g speeds, nice.
Imagine the voices in your head & rapid rate of cancer we will gain!
Because 4G cannot handle the amount of data traffic anymore. Too many people watching too many videos, too many emails, uploading too many high resolution photos to facebook..... and you're contributing solely based on the data that was transferred from your comment.
Information has been sent over airwaves since the first radio was invented. This is nothing new.
Ryan VanDenBerg I guess we are all contributing, including YOU!
@@444brandy we wont get cancer from 5G radiation, it only has a freaquency of a microwave, the radiation is not even ionize or powerful enough to mutate out cells, visible light has more radiation freaquency than 5G, Sun emits ultraviolet
Will the wonder of 5G finnaly help me find the G-Spot?
you wish!
it won't matter, everyone will be sterilized by radiation and vape e-smokes !!! :-(
@@woodypigeon oh, ya - those are amazing videos when juuls explodes in peoples pockets and burn them with the flaming lithium battery ! There mom told them smoking was bad for their health.
But seriously,
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3719292/
The tiny amount of 1.0 mg/kg B.W. of nicotine is destructive to male fertility and bad news, destroys sex drive too... :-(
Old man your just going to shorten your life with 5 g but go ahead take the easier way out
*finnaly" ISN'T.A.WORD. SMDH Try "finally". How are you supposedly a grown adult but have no knowledge of BASIC ENGLISH!!??? You're a disgrace...and largely part of societies ruination/demise. Thanks
I would love to seeing somebody try to explain this to someone in the 50s. Unbelievable to shit we can do now
Actually they would probably understand it better because amateur radio culture was much strong then
Oncologist are licking their chops.
Exactly.... this is how the industry (as a whole) write their own paycheck.
All three of you are fucking insane lol
Source? I'm so sick of people making bold claims without evidence. That is known as religious belief.
@@EclecticSceptic lol yes
@@Byefriendo Didn't you hear? Paranoia + dogmatism = subversive.
3G wasn't the first to bring us online. 2G did with the slow GPRS, then EDGE.
This is the grid system and radiation that will control each one of you that's what this is
And You. Don't forget yourself. If I'm going to be fried. So will everyone else.
Nigward nonneed for this
Offchili no
2 concerns:
Wouldn't beam forming reveal the exact location of every device in the network? (privacy issue?)
What about coverage? needing exponential amount of antennas impact this? Even 4G struggles having much longer wavelength...
😘😗
5g and 4g can coexist so in rural areas they can have 4g and in cities and big areas they can have 5g
And if beam forming did reveal out location that is actually good bc then if we call 911 they can pinpoint out location better
What kind of nonsense is this. Treating 3kHz-6GHz as one and claiming that spectrum over 6GHz is clear? oh please
mateyko555 Then, my ruler claims that 1 - 100 cm as one.
I was thinking the same thing. 6GHZ signals get stopped by an obstructions like leaves and humidity. I don't see them being feasible for wide-scale data transmission.
Hans That's why small cell is needed.
they are going to put them on all the street lights and shit.. we are going to be blasted with microwaves it's fucked up
mateyko555 they are planning to use 26GHz, which is where A LOT of spectrum is available, which allows for super high speed communication. Everything below 6GHz is very much taken already.
Obviously below 500Mhz the spectrum is useless for internet communication :p
"Just imagine getting blasted by invisible fire"
@Hernando Malinche thank you
@Hernando Malinche The frequency doesn't play a big role. What's relevant is the field intensity of the frequency since it's possible to cause harm with any frequency if the field intensity is high enough, which is the case for 5G.
@@ChamGee How is it, exactly? I doubt you're exposed to kilowatts of energy all at once from 5G. The signal to your phone is a few watts at best, it's not constant either so there is no danger of cooking from 5G.
Back in 2008, some people were stilled allowed to speak the truth: ruclips.net/video/J1w4g2vr7B4/видео.html
millimeter waves in action...
@@Slenderman63323 ONE 5G transmitter will pass the safety tests... but walking in cities, you'll be flooded with dozens of towers blasting you with every step... Something like this, but below your ability to feel it: ruclips.net/video/J1w4g2vr7B4/видео.html
You can tell something is up when people can't even debate the comments talking about health concerns, only attack or mock them
Health concerns for 5G shouldn't be specific to 5G. We have TONS of of radiation everywhere especially EM. This is just not a new issue.
@@Gongolongo - Also, it should be noted that 5G is not a frequency band - it is a network architecture. It will employ several existing technologies and existing frequency bands. Some of the new higher frequency bands will be new to the mobile application - but, have been in use for many years in fixed wireless and satellite applications. There isn't really anything novel about 5G, except the way the different pieces are being put together. The concern about the use of higher frequencies is particularly misplaced as these will mostly be reflected, rather than absorbed by human tissue. Chill out folks!
And you are a scientist?
Well there you go.
imagine downloading an HD video in under a second.....
Imagine getting cancer in under a second!!
Imagine getting a brain and not assuming stupid stuff
@Henry the meme machine Quit it with these "visible lights have higher frequencies" comments. Visible light is created naturally these frequencies aren't. It doesn't make sense to compare the two.
Wait. So you're saying trees & rain can "absorb" the signal...
And, we're just supposed to ignore the obvious implications for our actual bodies? Sign me up! 😐
And you are a scientist?
Paper can absorb alpha radiation, and so can the skin, but the skin faces no adverse affects from it.
@@Steffsh Maybe he just isn't a sucker.
I don't think the trees or rain are damaged by absorbing the electromagnetic radiation... they absorb solar radiation just fine, heck they die without it..... the absorption is bad for the user that wanted to receive the data and didn't get it... The raindrop does not give a shit, and the plants don't care about your service either....
Don't cellular base stations have duplexers to allow TX and RX on the same antenna? Two way radio has had that for a long time.
They do indeed.
I'll wait for 6G
Lol in that case I m waiting for 7G 😂😂
What do people do that don't want all that 4g is fine 12 mbp is enough for me but I feel like I will be forced to have it just because of the overhaul unifying communication.
the internet of things = the surveillance of EVERYTHING,not to mention weaponized millimeter waves. Oh gee I cant wait to download movies in under a second
yeah and if you trade your brain for a microchip u can also WATCH movies under a second!
You certainly don't know what the Internet of Things means
Anybody knows any scientific article that descibes all or some of the technologies mentioned in this video? If yes please give me the Citation :)
Greetings. This video is from IEEE... you may start looking for in their huge collection.
So I can cook a movie in 1 minute and download my brain in half a second..
You get it. In a funny way but you understand what 5g is.
Does this mean we won't need to use condoms anymore since our sperm will evaporate?
Wtf😂😂😂
No need for condoms 5G is going to cause a massive decline in fertility as well as a huge rise in death and disease.
It won't hurt you. 5G reaches a maximum frequency of 95Ghz. X-rays (known to be harmful in the long run) reach a minimum of 30 petahertz (3×10^16 Hz). If it is harmful why is it being implemented in so many cites around the world? Do your research if you don't trust something.
@@Steffsh Part of a massive depopulation agenda.
But I just explained that it wont cause that you dingus
Just imagine that broadband radiation cooking your sperm into mutant territory.
Just imagine that signal screwing with people's minds... Turning them into homicidal sociopaths.
Imagine... If you would... THE WALKING DEAD!!! Brought to you by Sprint!
don't worry, scro. Brawndo has electrolytes.
The wavelengths of 5g radiowaves are still less powerful than this of light meaning that you are more likely to die of standing outside than in a 5g signal
Very nice video to understand!!
I want know how to determine frequency to design 5 G antenna for research.
There's always a price to pay for advancing technology. And, I don't mean money.
Yuup. QR reading tirrany this time
No mention regarding the impact that may have in our health.
You forget to mention that "millimeter" wave means MICROWAVE.
5G IS LIKE STINKING YOUR HEAD IN MICROWAVE
r c Dont mind if I do
No millimeter is the distance between the waves not the wavelengths meaning that the radiowaves are still non ionising and therefore harmless
Millimeter waves are electromagnetic (radio) waves typically defined to lie within the frequency range of 30-300 GHz. The microwave band is just below the millimeter-wave band and is typically defined to cover the 3-30-GHz range
@@roberthernandez782 finally someone who isn't an idiot
What does it do to plants/animals? Not one mention of whether or not its safe to use, being as the waves are so much more powerful than 4G
Animal & plant life are more electromagnetic hypersensitive that people
It dosent do anything to them
5G, AI, IoT = Ultimate surveillance state/ technocracy
you have been using ai and iot since the early 2010s
The survivor's immunity to radiation may take man to the moon.
How bad is 5g for health ??
@@tommywaltz400 I think he is a troll.
@@tommywaltz400 That's a good question. Not sure if anyone really knows, because for some reason, a bunch of smartass namecallers don't want to allow the conversation.
@@unacceptableonanon2655 okay, here you go. 5g won't have any great affect on health as the radiation isn't at a level that is Ionizing like UV rays. Learn basic physics and you'll understand this.
@@Khro Radiation doesn't need to be ionizing to be harmful.
What we need is more time outside not virtual reality
fvcking boomer went gnee gnee on facebook
any clue what software is used here to animate? thank u
how the hell can radio waves have extremely high Gigahertz frequencies? radio waves are at the beginning of the Electromagnetic spectrum and have the highest wavelength, hence lowest frequency!
I believe that they will be using mmwaves, its basically an untouched section of the spectrum, down side it about 2-10 homes would have a transmitter out in front of it.
Just imagine your mitochondrial Dna (mtdna) breaking down under the next layer of directional non native Emf .
It won't, the frequency range is non-ionizing, it'll only heat tissue at extreme power levels, similar to a microwave oven.
Fun fact: your cellphone can only produce 2 watts of RF power Max
Guys I am going in Chernobyl its safer in there.
Couldn't agree more with you. It's of course safer in Chernobyl.
@Mario Thank you for your information. We really need people like you.
@@mridulbarman4114 lol he's wrong, it's a weapons system
What's up with crazy conspiracy theories. There are no serious health concerns. I live in 4G city and we are planning to moving to 5G
ユーネ / Yuune no id believe him the people who make “5g” dont give af abt the public bandwith there is always a double meaning for something
“Everything you need to know” Sounds like “everything we want you to know so that you won’t feel the need to do your own research”
Please do your own research then. Search on safe, scientific sites
@paul w yep, nothing burger; thanks for confirming
5G hasnt been defined by the fcc yet. its just a marketing term right now.
Max Myzer You can go to arXiv and look at the progress they got with 5G, your statment is true.
Max Myzer & now the fcc is in full acceleration with the 5g as of TODAY
Can't wait. Hilarious all the flat earther type comments here.
Fucking labeler.
It is less hilarious when you realise these people are allowed to vote.
@Roland Roland News flash, Murica not the only country.
@Duke Hugh Johnson no, I described a person's action to label. A label is "a classifying phrase or name applied to a person or thing, especially one that is inaccurate or restrictive.
Yes. Your digs are stupendous. The earth IS flat.
*Becomes concerned about 5g. Realizes that he has 4g which could be used to do the same thing and that ppl freak out literally everytime new tech comes out*
Jmil Lol t
Best part is 5g works in lower frequencies too. (600mhz), 5g is only a networking protocol not a particular frequency range.
People don’t like change, we’re weird.
@@vaultec1367 lie
@@joliearanda6481 prove me wrong.
Does the millimeter wave frequencies penetrate skin? Since the 28-39GHz signal can get blocked by anything, does that mean it absorbs it, or is it just to weak to absorb?
J'ai du écouter ça en cours d'anglais je vous déteste
menfou + palu
The biggest threat to human life is man himself.
No shit
Indeed, now if people could stop committing arson that would be GREAT.
@@TheGreatBackUpVIDEOS It would better if the government wasn't trying to control the weather and desiccating our environment...
vermontindependent.net/california-burning-ground-zero-for-us-geoengineering-our-geoengineering-age-essay-10/
www.5gspaceappeal.org/ www.stopbitburning.com/ Stop Agenda 21 everyone!
Imagine getting enslaved by 5g technology.
Ulette lol what? How?
+Stetson Graham 5G is used as a weapon in the military "ADS (Active Denial System) Look into it, it's worth consideration- im checking it out atm, I personally do want this tech harming my children- just imagine what effect they'll have on newborns and fetuses (e.g. pregnant women have been told not to use the microwave since it can harm their baby- just imagine the effects 5G will have along with citywide Wi-Fi)
Stetson Graham ~ And this makes what your 19th 20th attempt to placate or derail? Don't bother taking time to answer I see you for what you are, move on to your next interjection.
You're already enslaved by Facebook and Instagram...
We’re fucked.
Didn't quite understand from this how you can get full duplex on the same frequency - won't you block yourself?
I'm two years late but:
Time and frequency division multiple acces (T/FDMA) one transmits at a time, per channel, either server or subscriber. The role of TX/RX switches many times a second
There are so many side effects in nature due to these waves generated ~~~
Just ask the bees ~~~~~*
Bees are dying because of C02 emissions causing more extreme weather patterns, not because of EMF signals.
@@ATTACA88 Science says you are wrong. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969719301718
Why do we need 5G?
4G works perfectly wherever I go and I can still stream movies.
Lol, you sound like someone who said why do we need Internet back in the day.
Because as the internet progresses so will the need for more bandwidth and faster speeds. 5G will let speeds up to 10Gbps be possible
because it will make millions sick
you are the type of person to ask why there isn't any air conditioning outside when it's hot.
bull@@sergiosoares8523
Its not new using the mm band, its just expensive and the signals are very directional easily blocked., all the small numerous 5g base stations need to be networked together too, so a massive expensive fiber network needs to installed to handle the bandwidth demand. Also not a good idea to have the population be blasted all day with 10~100Ghz signals as they will be absorbed by you're body, and the transmitters are in contact with you. Mobile devices were never intended to watch HD movies and move large amounts of data, as 1 the screes are too small, damage you're eye sight with the blue light, bad posture cause injury, they promote unsocial behavior, they are a distraction. They are for convenience, not a replacement for traditional desktop computer and or TV screen.
Then again, would you still be content with a whopping 640kb memory? ;-)
My main problem is the amount of resources being poured into this, just so that people can share a 4K^H^H32K video of their dog taking a shit, when there are so much better ways to use all these peoples know-how. The iphone 7 will not become something people will remember in a 1000 years, but we still look at the pyramids after more than 10.000 years while that was done with so little resources in comparison. So much potential is wasted. We could be on Mars or have fusion power, but no... we, the people, prefer an iphone. I hate this world.
@@mapi5032 That's the same argument I use about BTC sticking with 1MB / 1024KB blocks! And they're talking about LOWERING it even more? MORONS / actually they're just evil and don't wish BTC to take off, that's what should get worldwide adoption NOT 5G! Good thing there's Bitcoin Cash though so they can't stop us now getting worldwide adoption because we increase the blocks to the necessary sizes to enable worldwide massive adoption! :D If / when we achieve it and eliminate the federal reserve these criminals that print free money will be no more and they won't be able to enact this kind of shit against us nor all the other evil they do.
People should be more aware about the downsides and harms of the this technology too, a few things i am aware about are that it's starting to give rise to cutting out trees and plants to make way for the transmission frequencies and also the wireless transmissions are so powerful that a multitude of them can cause health issues to not only the human body but to all living organisms. I request everyone to research more and be aware.
this is all the same shit they said about 3g lol
coffeeblak86 why shit?
coffeeblak86 And it was true then. Usage has increased a lot since then. We will need 6G one day too when 5G is relatively slow.
SkullKing11841 when you want to download 64K (not 4K) movies (3D format or better, VR-Format of course) in under a second whilst downloading a retro game like GTA V (yes on your mobile device) in under 1 second, then you need 6G
SkullKing11841 I think you need 10G for your lifestyle.
MrGollum1996 The human eye can barely benefit from 8K over 4K (if at all) due to how well it can make out images, so 64K would be massively overkill.
Technology and BiG business tell us we need to go faster,,,spiritual leaders tell us we need to slow down..Which one makes money from there advice?
Ooooh new technology! Its faster??? OOooooooh gimme gimme gimme! I won't question anything. I'm sure you have it all figured out, Att, Verizon, TMobile, etc. I trust tech companies. They would NEVER hurt me!
That signal switching is huge. The reason all these ideas are built up and maybe not efficient is because of regulation. That's changing. People and small companies will figure this out.
@@adilahmed2623 are you insane? Shame on you for writing crap like that. Why on earth telecom companies would kill people, who are their own customers??? Maybe to never have revenue themselfs?
Well, how about you just do some research in the underlying technology. It's not a secret. You can see how it's built and what's inside.
@@artursvancans9702
At first every customer, killed by rf exposure is no more cell phone subscription customer.
2-nd major part of the customers recieve about the same exposure, so 1 dead today can mean million tomorror.
3-rd do cellops want to ruin their business by killing people (and also business reputation )
Research finished.
@@volodumurkalunyak4651 Do some research on Israel and their nefafrious plans to have the world all to themselves and then get back to us. FYI 5G is banned in Israel. That should give you a small clue.
IEEE really made the most helpful breakdown of complex/theoretical technology then never made another one again.
it is amazing how no one seems to be concerned about health issues and 5G
fast forward 5 years, and look at the cancer rates
There isn't any issues with 5G
Big deal. What? You can’t wait for a few minutes???? This world has really gone to mush!
Robin loves Jesus Oh I’m sure you can but not all of us can when our life’s work depends on fastest rates of information transfer. Your comment drips with condescension..
As u can assume:Full control of every move...
WE will all be in the Truman Show
This video shows how they already track everyone in China using this technology
You people are so scared of improved technology that it apparently becomes a violation of your very rights.
It's literally just faster speed.
If they didn't say anything, none of you would be talking about this.
Great video, but the comment section is full of people who don't know anything about anything. Only a couple of smart comments here and there, but mostly it's scared off people making irrational statements about the technology or something said in the video twisted to sound evil af.
ruclips.net/video/TOAcxyvXZWM/видео.html
Doesn’t sound practical
unfortunately it's already a reality sweet cheeks
The video says "0:54 - the truth is experts can't tell us what 5g actually is because they don't even know yet"
That's a lie. The military has been using it as a weapon for a long time. Look up Active Denial System. You've probably experienced millimeter waves at the airport getting a full-body scan.
Don't freak out people. They went from 3g to 4g and we all survived.
@@nokomismn9685 If you think militray used 5G as a weapon you don't know what 5G is.
morsiskopPC - The military weapon "Active Denial System" uses millimeter waves. Millimeter waves are part of 5G. Look it up.
@@nokomismn9685 What is the logic? Milimeter waves are also in use for example in communication with satellites, but satellites aren't part of 5G. Fact that every tree is a plant does not mean that every plant is a tree.
This video is, by far, the best explanation I have seen of 5G technologies. Great job!.
What is the take when using smaller waves and heating inside the bodies of people being close to the antennas?
Colors are even shorter waves.
@@FrainBart_main but they don't go thru us right?
@@Yturijea Neither do 5G frequencies that will be used for small cell antennas.
Thanks , good clear explanation of 5G ! I like the comments too , people express legitimate concerns , and also explore the science.
@Hernando Malinche You need to research more, and watch international current events & history.
AR VR with 5G will be 🔥
Could possibly arrive in the next 5 Years....
Yay 5 Years until we finally get Rekt by cancer
5G: possible 300GHz Green coming off Grass: 300,000 GHz
@@scarffoxandfriends9401
Actually cancer-causing radiation (UV and higher): 3,000,000GHz or above.
Hi there,
Please can I use some of your animation in my university video about the effects of 5G? Thank you
Simple to understand. Thank you!
Definitively not everything I need to know about 5G.
Just imagine it works on the same wavelength of our brains?no standards,no testing n no regulations,does anyone see any problems?of course not the just want it faster n more gigs n screw their health
What the... do you even know what the electromagnetic radiation is?
Aren't millimeter waves also misused as torture tech weapons against civilians?
Nwo control grid
i hate to say it.. but you are devastatingly right
this was the best explanation...unlike others u had even explained con of 5g...without much hoo haa....thank you.
Super clear... light years ahead any other similar video on YT... TY!
In Mexico people think doctors are stealing the liquid inside their knees to lube 5G antenas 😂😂😂
The crazy just keeps getting crazier.
wow people don't know basic physics
Today an Engineer of a mobile tower himself said that even 4g is harmful and 5g is way harmful and he should not be saying these as a company employee but we deserve to know the truth.
Are you gonna trust one person?
@@Azmie11 nope, I'm gonna trust what I feel take what we really need and reject what's unnecessary.
ok
sunlight is also harmful
Before they kill me and kill me quick. I'm going back to basic. Give me back my phone lines please? I'll call you when i get home..
facebook.com/groups/408666892574591/?ref=group_header
Ok boomer
Lol 😂 right
It is comforting to know that the 5G towers on light poles right next to homes and apartment windows put out 5,750 times more radiation than 4G phones.
I disagree with you on that... have you made the math? dBm calculations?
In future, To get 10 g speed every smartphone becomes signal antenna tower