You make amazingly simple videos that are packed with information easy to understand by most people. This information applies to RC aircraft too. Thank you and keep making these great videos.
passengers would question it, but if the cabin crew know what they're talking about and make the explanation very simple im sure passengers wouldnt mind (:
@@HappyBeezerStudios Well, one more really in most cases, but they can just market it as a spare engine, in case the bird strike-induced dual engine loss and subsequent landing in the hudson river ever happens again
@@flightclubonline Just an update, I passed my ride! I have already been sending my students (and will be sending future students) to this channel. Thank you for helping me along this journey :)
The P-38 Lightning had counter-rotating propellers rotating opposite to what is depicted here. In the prototype they rotated as depicted here but they reversed rotation to solve a yaw instability that couldn't solve otherwise. As a result the P-38 had two critical engines, meaning that in both engines the thrust vector was outward of the engine center axis.
so in order to avoid this effect, the angle od attact of blades should be contolled (you can changed it, for instance either to drcreas the angle of attack of the lower blade, and increase the angle of attack of the blade which is moving upward) in order to have the same lift force produced by the two blades... that goes for the blades of helicopters as well.
I guess less engine could mean less chance of survival if 1 or 2 engines die, so it's kinda logical to be scared to board a plane that had 3 asymmetrical engines rather than 4 symmetrical looking ones
A bit of the reason why twinjets couldn't do transatlantic flights for so long, giving rise to trijet setups. Less fuel consumption than 4 engines, but the redundancy 2 engines don't have.
But why would the 3 engined engine be a thing,wont that create reaction force like the single prop? Bc 2 of the engines will cancle each other but the 3rd one would be unnecessary
Hello. I request you to please re upload your video on upwash and downwash in aircraft. I found it very helpful but it is missing from your playlist now. Thank you
You make amazingly simple videos that are packed with information easy to understand by most people. This information applies to RC aircraft too.
Thank you and keep making these great videos.
passengers would question it, but if the cabin crew know what they're talking about and make the explanation very simple im sure passengers wouldnt mind (:
"our plane is so good, it can do with one less engine"
@@HappyBeezerStudios Well, one more really in most cases, but they can just market it as a spare engine, in case the bird strike-induced dual engine loss and subsequent landing in the hudson river ever happens again
Thank you for all these videos, they are just amazing, short and we learn a lot of things. Continue as well !
Please make a video on "moment coefficient".
Thank you
Got my CFI ride coming up, perfect timing. Love the videos! Much love from the US :)
Good luck :)
Same In June 14th is mine. Studying yellow book like crazy
@@sahalmullan2012 best of luck dude
@@flightclubonline Just an update, I passed my ride! I have already been sending my students (and will be sending future students) to this channel. Thank you for helping me along this journey :)
Excellent video. Normal people like symmetry. They would be afraid to board an aicraft that was noticeably non-standard
Love your content...can you pls do vortex generators. And what vortex generators delay in a aircraft.
Excellent explanation! Thank you!
The P-38 Lightning had counter-rotating propellers rotating opposite to what is depicted here. In the prototype they rotated as depicted here but they reversed rotation to solve a yaw instability that couldn't solve otherwise. As a result the P-38 had two critical engines, meaning that in both engines the thrust vector was outward of the engine center axis.
so in order to avoid this effect, the angle od attact of blades should be contolled (you can changed it, for instance either to drcreas the angle of attack of the lower blade, and increase the angle of attack of the blade which is moving upward) in order to have the same lift force produced by the two blades... that goes for the blades of helicopters as well.
It's harder and inefficient to do that, the better solution is to calibrate the rudder or angle the motor
These videos are breathtakingly good.
Please make a video on:
What happens when plane moves vertical upward? How 4 forces of flight act upon the plane?
Well to answer your first question , it will most likely stall, unless you are in a really powerful fighter plane.
Ayy thanks for the amazing video
Glad you enjoyed!
I guess less engine could mean less chance of survival if 1 or 2 engines die, so it's kinda logical to be scared to board a plane that had 3 asymmetrical engines rather than 4 symmetrical looking ones
A bit of the reason why twinjets couldn't do transatlantic flights for so long, giving rise to trijet setups. Less fuel consumption than 4 engines, but the redundancy 2 engines don't have.
Excellent, as usual; great graphics.
Thank you kindly!
To answer the question, I'd fly all of 'em!
But why would the 3 engined engine be a thing,wont that create reaction force like the single prop? Bc 2 of the engines will cancle each other but the 3rd one would be unnecessary
The single engine seems to be further outside on the wing, giving it a longer lever on the plane.
People think that our faces are symmetric as well. But the fact is that everyone's left side of the face is asymmetrical to the right one ;)
thumbnail picture looks like it would lean to the left more than hassan piker
FWIW: I did not know Blohm & Voss had designed any asymmetric aircraft besides the BV-141.
I'll never look at a counter rotating propeller twin engine the same way after seeing this...
Hello.
I request you to please re upload your video on upwash and downwash in aircraft. I found it very helpful but it is missing from your playlist now.
Thank you
Thank you. However, we didn't make this video - perhaps you've seen it on another channel. Cheers.
@@flightclubonline okay
I am sorry. Will you make one it 😅
No mention of centrifugal force...
Symmetric plains are easier to design.
I can see it spins both ways :v 2:07
The last one... not good. haha~ a little bit asymmetrical design inside the engine could be better, I guess. Thank you for your explanation.
Thanks for watching!
Thank you
Welcome!
Yawring
I also noticed 💀💀