Considering the cost to build and difference in quality and amount of performance why is the Blizzard Thunderbird R15 WB twice the price of the Blizzard Thunderbird R15 LTD?
Where are you seeing these prices? My guess is that you're seeing the 2024 version of the LTD (which is really only a binding upgrade) at full price and an older version of the R15 WB that is discounted? They now have an R13 which takes the place of the older narrower version. All R15's are now the same width.
Skiied these over February in France. I’ve honestly never carved better in my life on the good pistes higher up but as conditions heated up I found them tiring to navigate the slushy stuff, they were tricky over moguls I found too. What would you suggest next time as a ski that performs well in slush and steep black piste moguls?
Compared with the Thunderbird Sports Ti, which one is stiffer? I'm looking for an all-mountain carver and would like to choose one that handles bumps/mogul better. Also, for a 172cm/155lb intermediate skier, is 165cm a good length? Thanks!
The R15 has a stronger build and less taper than the Sport. The Sport is still a fantastic carver, and I'd much rather ski it in the bumps versus the R15. I'd say 165 is pretty good for your stats and application.
Was the Thunderbird R13 ever tested in comparison to the R15 WB? Can't find R15 WB in stock here but there is a R13 pair with a decent price. Any thoughts would be appreciated!
Looking for a frontside ski for my quiver to replace the old Rossignol Pursuit 600. Trying to decide between the Volkl Deacon 80, Blizzard Thunderbird r15 WB, and the Elan Wingman 86 CTI. Any thoughts on how to decide? I feel like all 3 of these choices are performance upgrades on the Rossi’s and all three seem highly rated by your team. I’m 5’10” Advance Skier at 210lbs. Thanks.
I can say that while we like all three of those skis, we had very positive experiences on the Thunderbird overall. It's a nice blend of strength and power to go along with quickness and agility. The Wingman, I find, takes the performance to another level while the Deacon is on the lighter-duty side, while remaining a complete and total joy to ski. That said, there's just something awesome about that Thunderbird that was almost universally loved. I'd say the 175 is the length in that ski for you.
Considering the cost to build and difference in quality and amount of performance why is the Blizzard Thunderbird R15 WB twice the price of the Blizzard Thunderbird R15 LTD?
Where are you seeing these prices? My guess is that you're seeing the 2024 version of the LTD (which is really only a binding upgrade) at full price and an older version of the R15 WB that is discounted? They now have an R13 which takes the place of the older narrower version. All R15's are now the same width.
What is the weight for each length?
Thanks. I should have waited for the end of the video. Great job, both of you.
Skiied these over February in France. I’ve honestly never carved better in my life on the good pistes higher up but as conditions heated up I found them tiring to navigate the slushy stuff, they were tricky over moguls I found too. What would you suggest next time as a ski that performs well in slush and steep black piste moguls?
I'd move up to a somewhat stiff ~90 mm underfoot ski like the Volkl Kendo 88 or the Salomon Stance 90.
@@SkiEssentials thanks for the quick response I’ll be sure to try them out next time I’m out!
Compared with the Thunderbird Sports Ti, which one is stiffer? I'm looking for an all-mountain carver and would like to choose one that handles bumps/mogul better. Also, for a 172cm/155lb intermediate skier, is 165cm a good length? Thanks!
The R15 has a stronger build and less taper than the Sport. The Sport is still a fantastic carver, and I'd much rather ski it in the bumps versus the R15. I'd say 165 is pretty good for your stats and application.
Was the Thunderbird R13 ever tested in comparison to the R15 WB? Can't find R15 WB in stock here but there is a R13 pair with a decent price. Any thoughts would be appreciated!
It's more race-oriented than the R15WB, so if you're looking for a narrower option for a front side ski, it's pretty great!
Looking for a frontside ski for my quiver to replace the old Rossignol Pursuit 600. Trying to decide between the Volkl Deacon 80, Blizzard Thunderbird r15 WB, and the Elan Wingman 86 CTI. Any thoughts on how to decide? I feel like all 3 of these choices are performance upgrades on the Rossi’s and all three seem highly rated by your team. I’m 5’10” Advance Skier at 210lbs. Thanks.
I can say that while we like all three of those skis, we had very positive experiences on the Thunderbird overall. It's a nice blend of strength and power to go along with quickness and agility. The Wingman, I find, takes the performance to another level while the Deacon is on the lighter-duty side, while remaining a complete and total joy to ski. That said, there's just something awesome about that Thunderbird that was almost universally loved. I'd say the 175 is the length in that ski for you.
@@SkiEssentials What length for Thunderbird would you recommend to someone at 6'5" 215lbs and intermediate, training for for the advanced level?