$30 Casio = 600ft Under Water?!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 сен 2024
  • Casio A158WA is rated for 30 Meter water resistance, but it can do much more than that. Today we test out the theory of water resistance and what it means. Is it just splash proof or is it more than that?
    Thanks to ISO 22810 that is on all modern watches, 30M really means 30M unless the gaskets degrade over time. This Casio took a heck of a lot more than that to finally break.
    The CASIO I Used: amzn.to/3VTfWFx
    Inexpensive Depth Tank: amzn.to/3gqxWqo
    Wrist Size: 6.75" or 17cm
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Website: www.harrisonswatches.com
    Instagram: / harrisonelmore
    Favorite Straps: artemstraps.com?sca_ref=6748293.BxtEOQxkZb
    My Watch Box: amzn.to/3F2TpQf
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Stuff I Use:
    Primary Camera: amzn.to/3VW521z
    Secondary Camera: amzn.to/3TNBO3k
    Macro Lens: amzn.to/3DqMob7
    Tripod Head: amzn.to/3MXBYTr
    Tripod Body: amzn.to/3D0Beby
    Video Storage:amzn.to/3N15kAm
    Floating Bulb in Background: amzn.to/3gDAZeT
    Directional Microphone: amzn.to/3DntuSq
    Lighting Kit: amzn.to/3TxkTSH
    (2) Of These 128GB SD Cards: amzn.to/3SxmBlP
    Watchmaking Tools:
    Bergeon Screwdriver Set Ergonomic: amzn.to/3spLVj4
    Bergeon Matt: amzn.to/3SyFZ1I
    Bergeon SpringBar Tool: amzn.to/3eWJNfu
    Bergeon Case Opening Ball: amzn.to/3gplHdF
    Bergeon Rodico: amzn.to/3VPmULL
    George Daniels Watchmaking Book: amzn.to/3TIg9JW

Комментарии • 359

  • @HarrisonElmore
    @HarrisonElmore  Год назад +133

    As a note: ISO22810 is the spec all watches have to meet. Dress watches up to dive watches. It’s designed to address ambiguity of water resistance in ‘watches, so yes, your watch meets those specific depths. Obviously most of us aren’t comfortable trying it, but they are. 🎉

    • @johnw6613
      @johnw6613 Год назад +5

      hey man could you do the same test with a timex weekender i dont have faith there build quality will stand up to the 30 m wr rating

    • @yosuhimekawa9053
      @yosuhimekawa9053 Год назад

      Even the vintage ones?

    • @user-gj1tf6hf9o
      @user-gj1tf6hf9o Год назад

      @@yosuhimekawa9053no, also seals will age and deteriorate causing the wr to lower

    • @spencergeorge4941
      @spencergeorge4941 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@yosuhimekawa9053I think he meant to say all watches that are marked as water resistant (which is a vast majority of them). There are, of course, many watches that aren’t water resistant, or aren’t tested to the ISO spec, but may have some resistance anyway despite not being labeled as such.

    • @TheChzoronzon
      @TheChzoronzon 11 месяцев назад +4

      Dude... you REALLY have a problem with counting... and with coherence and safety: "the tank is rated for 100m, and I don't want it to explode in my face", then you proceed to go DOUBLE that while putting your eyes super close...
      What a champ :D

  • @barryvercueil2346
    @barryvercueil2346 Год назад +665

    This video just convinced 100 people to buy a Casio. They owe you commission man!!!!

    • @nkonig1
      @nkonig1 Год назад +39

      Yep. Proof that they live up to their God Tier status! I think this gives me confidence to wear mine a little rougher now.

    • @user-iw2mo7yu4d
      @user-iw2mo7yu4d Год назад +10

      Jokes on you I already own 1😂

    • @techmadgeek
      @techmadgeek Год назад +14

      101...I'm on the way to the shop now.

    • @Walter_Sobchak_43
      @Walter_Sobchak_43 Год назад +4

      Maybe because they are so affordable, but I usually take my Casio swimming instead of my actual dive watches. Never had a problem. 😅😂

    • @rasellink6875
      @rasellink6875 Год назад

      😂😂😂😂😂

  • @ambientblue-eyedmonkey8849
    @ambientblue-eyedmonkey8849 11 месяцев назад +118

    2:39 you're 40 meters down below trapped and about to run out of oxygen and your casio watch beeps to tell you it's 11 o'clock.

  • @e28forever30
    @e28forever30 11 месяцев назад +225

    Casio delivers.
    No BS, no fancy talk, just down to earth, affordable quality stuff.
    Love it.

    • @HarrisonElmore
      @HarrisonElmore  11 месяцев назад +12

      Couldn't agree more!

    • @Drownedinblood
      @Drownedinblood 7 месяцев назад +7

      I wish more companies were like casio....taking something traditionally luxury and making it available for everyone and super durable.

  • @shawnlavigne9069
    @shawnlavigne9069 Год назад +381

    I'm surprised. I knew it could go the full 30. But 200 is incredible.

    • @HarrisonElmore
      @HarrisonElmore  Год назад +36

      I was not expecting it either!

    • @philipcooper8297
      @philipcooper8297 11 месяцев назад +12

      No need to be surprised. It's 30m in real life conditions, such as washing hands and swimming. The resistance of water while you swim puts way more pressure on the watch case than when you just let it sit in a tank like that.

    • @TheChzoronzon
      @TheChzoronzon 11 месяцев назад +21

      ​@@philipcooper8297 I doubt very, very much that the most violent swimming movements could account for even one more atmosphere of pressure, not even close...and he went 17 more
      Do you have any link or study that says that swimming movements can produce such forces?

    • @philipcooper8297
      @philipcooper8297 11 месяцев назад +2

      @@TheChzoronzon Do you understand hydrodynamics?

    • @gjeraldh2989
      @gjeraldh2989 11 месяцев назад +19

      @@philipcooper8297 i don't, it would be helpful if you could elaborate.

  • @TheFailingBoat
    @TheFailingBoat Год назад +83

    I go surfing in the north sea almost every week and I always wear the same f91w while surfing for at least 7 years now, and it is still going strong.

    • @3vamtb
      @3vamtb 11 месяцев назад +1

      I use the same, but for mountaineering since 2014 and it still works like day 1.

    • @yashrajsrgm
      @yashrajsrgm 11 месяцев назад +3

      And people right here saying "I want sea master just for my swimming!" Lol

    • @Unlucky1776
      @Unlucky1776 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@yashrajsrgmI mean I want a seamaster regardless

    • @jackjackmillar
      @jackjackmillar 11 месяцев назад

      In Scotland?

    • @yashrajsrgm
      @yashrajsrgm 11 месяцев назад +2

      @@Unlucky1776 bro 💀 it's your choice anyways. For some people like me, watch is just a tool and if $30 gets me what I want, then why not 🤷‍♂️

  • @deepfinds
    @deepfinds 11 месяцев назад +31

    As a keen metal detector enthusiast, I've found dozens of wrist watches in the ocean. From $1 to $1800 watches. The ONLY, and I mean literally, the only watches that ever survive the roughest surf conditions are Casio watches. They are unkillable. They can be slammed on rocks, buries meters below sand and tumbled for years and not die. I found one last night with a flat battery, been there at least a few years. I guarantee it'll work with a new battery. lol

    • @adrian_certified
      @adrian_certified 8 месяцев назад +1

      Did it work??

    • @deepfinds
      @deepfinds 8 месяцев назад

      yep lmao@@adrian_certified

    • @damyr
      @damyr 8 месяцев назад +1

      Does it work?

  • @graveyardz56
    @graveyardz56 9 месяцев назад +18

    Apple : *throwing tantrum at 40m*
    Casio : 'hey man it's 11 am'

  • @jacobduran8997
    @jacobduran8997 11 месяцев назад +121

    I had no idea it could go down to such depths below sea level and still function as intended! One of the reason why I will forever trust Casio's brand!

    • @arpanmahapatra342
      @arpanmahapatra342 11 месяцев назад +18

      You'd be dead before the watch

    • @jacobduran8997
      @jacobduran8997 11 месяцев назад +10

      @@arpanmahapatra342 I have no plans on going into such depths myself. I just think it's cool that it can resist such high pressure.

    • @Bljat69
      @Bljat69 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@arpanmahapatra342if you loose casio watch and find it after 10 years it will still have like half the battery. My is still working after 5 years on cheapest battery you can find

    • @Unlucky1776
      @Unlucky1776 11 месяцев назад

      @@arpanmahapatra342that’s true as well because it is a quartz watch so it’ll probab outlast us all

    • @randomcow505
      @randomcow505 11 месяцев назад +4

      friend of mines f91w got it in the screen by a police training paint marker round and survived, the plastic cover was fucked up, but you could still see the watch ticking away
      the marker rounds are no joke either, one of them tore straight through the webbing on my hand.
      we also found one that had been buried for god knows how long in the dirt in a 10cm deep muddy puddle, only reason we found it was because the fucking alarm went off and we got bollocked for having alarms set 😂

  • @Makul-rt4sz
    @Makul-rt4sz Год назад +47

    I had casio rated as WR(lowest rating) only, wich means good enough for washing hands only..I used it for swimming for years and never had any issues with it..casio's are capable far more then they claim

  • @matthewblome6547
    @matthewblome6547 Год назад +111

    I have been diving in the Red Sea with exactly that Casio down to 40m. No problems, also years later. I have also dived with a F91W down to the same depths, also no problems. Wish I had the confidence in my other 30m WR watches. It is so confusing to consumers, as dress watches that are 30m WR cannot possibly do that

    • @predragjo5977
      @predragjo5977 Год назад +10

      I'd say that the case material contributes a lot to WR. Its made of resin and the resin compresses under the pressure.

    • @noisepuppet
      @noisepuppet Год назад +2

      I've been wondering if pushing the buttons at that depth could let some water in. Do you use the buttons at depth?

    • @dnichl
      @dnichl 11 месяцев назад +9

      ​@@noisepuppetit will let water in for sure. it's just a few o rings that fit around the buttons. at that depth it would unseat, let out the air and not seal again. never operate buttons under water. same goes for water resistance rated physical phone buttons.

    • @dnichl
      @dnichl 11 месяцев назад +9

      reminds me of a video where somebody put their f91w on a cruise ship anchor or fishing net or something at let it go down 100m+. came back fully functional with zero water ingress.

  • @timemeasured9137
    @timemeasured9137 Год назад +52

    If you’re gonna go digital go Casio!!!! Can’t go wrong. We all need at least one digital in the collection.

    • @HarrisonElmore
      @HarrisonElmore  Год назад +7

      Agreed!

    • @rhdtv2002
      @rhdtv2002 Год назад +4

      One?😊

    • @hehehexpresso
      @hehehexpresso Год назад +4

      Only one? You need them all!

    • @Loneace85
      @Loneace85 5 месяцев назад +2

      I have at least 5 digitals 😂

    • @ikupsugiarto
      @ikupsugiarto 2 дня назад +1

      That's what I said to myself before I got my A158. A few weeks later I had 3 Casio digitals :)

  • @ignaciopadilla5150
    @ignaciopadilla5150 Год назад +49

    Great video! Thank you for sacrificing a God Tier watch in proof that Casio 30m water resistance over passes its statement. Other fancy and expensive watches that claim 30m you can barely wash your hands with them. You showed this Casio did not just surpassed its WR ratings but also was submerged in water for a long period of time.

    • @HarrisonElmore
      @HarrisonElmore  Год назад +6

      Agreed! It was far better than I expected.

  • @dtuk22
    @dtuk22 Год назад +16

    I Love this....proof that a $30 watch is better than ridiculously expensive watches. I couldn't fine a direct comparison but thats a greater depth than two Statue of Libertys stacked.

    • @fuckgoogle6091
      @fuckgoogle6091 11 месяцев назад +1

      So water resistance is the only metric to judge a watch on?🤣

    • @fuckgoogle6091
      @fuckgoogle6091 11 месяцев назад +1

      So the James Cameron deep sea Rolex is the best watch ever made by taht logic 🤡

  • @TheGrenadier97
    @TheGrenadier97 Год назад +46

    Safe pressure rating on the vintage 30m Casios is definitely deeper than what's stated, and i don't think most other brands have that same degree of reliability. It's as if Casio deliberately overbuilt the resistance. However, i've always thought that digital quartz are inherently more robust; i'm curious as to how analogs like MQ-24 and MTP-1095 (a dress watch) can hold against pressure.

    • @Bljat69
      @Bljat69 11 месяцев назад

      Sony. They lower their specs soo much on paper

  • @GottaGeek
    @GottaGeek 11 месяцев назад +81

    There's a very good chance the beeping stopped when you removed the back plate, because the back plate contains the speaker. Which just happens to look like a sticker.

    • @SidBonkers51
      @SidBonkers51 11 месяцев назад +4

      I didnt know that, thanx.

    • @GottaGeek
      @GottaGeek 11 месяцев назад +11

      @@SidBonkers51 there's a little Golden spring that goes through the movement and kind of pokes out to be able to touch the backplate when it's in place so it could also be a missing or bent spring

    • @Marin_Sp
      @Marin_Sp 10 месяцев назад +2

      It's piezo speaker.

    • @GottaGeek
      @GottaGeek 10 месяцев назад +1

      @MarinSperanda I know but most don't so I usually refer to it by just stating that it's a speaker.

  • @deatheater4805
    @deatheater4805 Год назад +13

    Holy shit... I bought this same watch a week ago. Little did i know this is some god tier stuff🙌

  • @michaeldemarillac9992
    @michaeldemarillac9992 11 месяцев назад +3

    I went diving for my yacht mooring while wearing my CASIO - W800H-1AV | Black Digital Watch. I bought it when a guy said this was all he needed when travelling around Australia. The only reason I don't wear it diving anymore is because I had a crazy elevator door in Malaysia, close on my wrist watch and it ripped one of the holes holding the strap spring bar. It could pop out at any time and fall of my wrist now. Best watch I had ever owned.

  • @huckinator
    @huckinator Год назад +12

    This was an awesome showcase! One watch that comes to mind is the Hamilton khaki king. I own one and never once have ever thought about 50m of water resistance being too little. Then you watch a review of it and that’s on almost all of the negatives list for it. I think crazy water resistance requirements for a watch to be “good” is ridiculous.

  • @ianmaw66
    @ianmaw66 Год назад +14

    If it's like G-shocks I opened the back is holds the buzzer so it is not surprising that the buzzer stopped when you removed the back. There is often a tiny spring which makes electrical contact. Excellent video, thanks.

  • @brett233
    @brett233 Год назад +16

    I’ve seen stuff like this before and I’d be confident taking any Casio with at least 30m WR swimming. Mostly because they are cheap, I wouldn’t take that risk with any expensive mechanical watch with less than 100m of WR.

  • @nojburns
    @nojburns 11 месяцев назад +10

    I believe the watch stopped beeping because you took off the case back. There is a very thin speaker on the inside of Casio case backs. This is electrified by a small spring that comes out of the movement and connects to the speaker. If the spring is still in the movement (they're very easy to lose) and you put the case back back on, I'm certain the speaker would continue to produce your beep.

  • @Bigfish1day
    @Bigfish1day Год назад +7

    Casio watches are really better than people think. I have a G-Shock solar that has been working for 14 years, I daily wore it for 13 years so far.

    • @e28forever30
      @e28forever30 11 месяцев назад +3

      I own a 15 year old Riseman, which still charges and syncs perfectly.
      Awesome watches.

    • @badd.syntaxx
      @badd.syntaxx 4 месяца назад

      hi how was the tough solar power? is it still high? or did ypi managed to changed its rechargeable battery?

  • @markloubser2433
    @markloubser2433 Год назад +7

    Got to hand it to Casio! Ive been diving with a Duro for years, no issues. Wouldnt want to do it with my more expensive watches...

  • @dmc6617
    @dmc6617 11 месяцев назад +8

    I don t think that every push of the lever equals to 2m as being a constant in this experiment. It may be that with the rising preassure, every lever push would provide less and less additional preassure as the air density inside the glass chamber rises. You should have used an actual gage with sufficient measuring capabilities for your experiment. On the other hand is clear that the little Casio behaved admirably and got well beyond its rating. But i don t think the high depth numbers are accurate in this experiment, unfortunately. I m 90% sure that the rate of preasure increasing per one lever pull is not a constant variable. Good luck!

  • @alignedguide6553
    @alignedguide6553 10 месяцев назад +7

    I'm the type of person to take off my G-Shock while washing hands and he's out here simulating scuba diving with one of their cheapest watches, really made me think

    • @StardustLegacyFighter
      @StardustLegacyFighter 9 месяцев назад +1

      Wtf dude, nobody I know takes off their mechanical watches when washing their hands, let alone a G-Shock.

  • @funkmonkeyfun
    @funkmonkeyfun Год назад +7

    One of my beater watches is my favorite F91w, after years I still swim with it, fish with it take steaming hot showers and I have never had condensation or water penetration, tough little watch. I have had a ton of 50 meter water resistance watch like armatron fail in a pool or shower.

  • @recon9640
    @recon9640 Год назад +3

    Best watch for the money. I've owned many casios, never had one single issue. Good video

  • @RedEye737
    @RedEye737 Год назад +11

    When you think you know casio, it just reminds you it's the opposite. Awesome video man

  • @ed342
    @ed342 Год назад +6

    One thing to keep in mind is operating the buttons under water, I went into a swimming pool with an F91W a few years ago and the screen fogged up, could've been me fiddling with it underwater or something else, but I don't trust anything less than 50m anymore. Whilst there are people here who have been surfing, diving etc with an F91 or similar, those that break probably just discard it and get a G-Shock or other watch.

    • @HobkinBoi
      @HobkinBoi 10 месяцев назад +1

      Generally you're not supposed to push the buttons/pull the crown on watches while they're underwater.

    • @badd.syntaxx
      @badd.syntaxx 4 месяца назад

      probably you got a fake one 😅

  • @techmadgeek
    @techmadgeek Год назад +3

    Beeper requires case back to function. You will probably find beeps will return if you were the replace case back.Great Video, thanks for posting.

  • @yamiii1776
    @yamiii1776 Месяц назад

    I’ve stopped surfing, swimming and paddling with my Seamaster. I now unapologetically go with my blue Casio F91W and it’s been superb!

  • @mattkinsella9856
    @mattkinsella9856 11 месяцев назад +1

    I just left a comment on another watch video saying that although I own a range of watches, some quite rare and expensive, I often just put on one of my Casio watches because they are great for everyday use and I never stress about them because they are almost indestructible and even if I did damage it, then I can replace it with the cash in my pocket. This video just proves my point but to the extreme!

  • @General_Mills_
    @General_Mills_ 11 месяцев назад +3

    The caseback is used as the resonator for the piezo (beep), so it has to be assembled for it to work. You can actually delete the beep by putting a piece of tape on the inside of the caseback before reassembly.

  • @a.m.7739
    @a.m.7739 Год назад +5

    That’s pretty incredible. Do it with you explorer now!! Kidding. Great work. Keep it up, sir

    • @HarrisonElmore
      @HarrisonElmore  Год назад +3

      Hahaha I’ll get right on that! I’m sure I could explain that to the insurance company!

    • @mojaal
      @mojaal Год назад +1

      @@HarrisonElmore No risk if you test it with just the case and crystal. Take the movement and dial out

  • @lakshbhambhani8565
    @lakshbhambhani8565 11 месяцев назад +6

    Incredibly dangerous to push the tank that far off its rated for 100m 🙈

    • @TheChzoronzon
      @TheChzoronzon 11 месяцев назад +4

      And putting his uncovered eyes close to the glass while at it... I was shaking my head all the time, the guy has a real problem with both counting and common sense :facepalm:

  • @connorhaggett9668
    @connorhaggett9668 Год назад +4

    “I want to get the watch to break before the tank does” Casio is the best

  • @ArcticSeraph
    @ArcticSeraph Год назад +7

    Makes me wonder how much the Casio A1000 can take since the crystal is mineral glass and not resin

  • @dp2418
    @dp2418 11 месяцев назад +2

    bought my first cheap casio when i was 10, lady said u'll go to college and still wear it. she was right:) casios are bulletproof

  • @iihchindiiko
    @iihchindiiko 9 месяцев назад +1

    I have similar variant that I used for more than a decade. It was tortured so much that the front was scrapped from bailing in asphalt. now I have my gshock for 6yrs. I mean the way I wore my watch. I only remove it when I take bath. hahaha I do labor work, chemicals, bailing from skate and longboard, swimming, sometime hitting on steel corners when at site. That's the same reason why I prefer casio than an expensive watch that decreases the value if I use it the same way. 😅

  • @-----REDACTED-----
    @-----REDACTED----- 8 месяцев назад +1

    So…I don’t know if it’s universal, but a mechanical engineer once told me that components usually have a designed safety margin of at least around three times the official rating.
    So while I wouldn’t expect it I wouldn’t be surprised if the actual failure point of the watch were to be around 90m…
    Edit:
    Well, I am impressed by that watch.

  • @NickNick-id8sb
    @NickNick-id8sb Год назад +5

    One of the best videos on casio I've seen (the other one is Teddy Baltassarre throwing G-SHOCKS out of a helicopter). This is probably the best review on the A158WA-1 without being a review. Awesome video. Great job.

  • @nancybasel
    @nancybasel 11 месяцев назад +1

    My Casio peeped at the hour mark just seconds before yours and when I heard yours I was preplaxed why my watch peeped twice 😂😂

  • @droobie827
    @droobie827 Год назад +4

    This would be a cool test to try on a cheap seiko 5 or even better Ali express dive watches

  • @augustocanosa785
    @augustocanosa785 11 месяцев назад +2

    So, basically any casio is a diver watch lol. Good video, dude

  • @alanaliyev456GT
    @alanaliyev456GT Год назад +5

    20 atm is enormous for this type of chamber... most transparent test chamber not exceed 10atm

  • @Tech101yt
    @Tech101yt Год назад +3

    seriously impressive, it outlasted the rated depth of a g-shock!

  • @Amin_2k
    @Amin_2k 11 месяцев назад +1

    I had this watch and i thought it was only splash resistant? never knew it could go to 30 meters or even more!

    • @HarrisonElmore
      @HarrisonElmore  11 месяцев назад +1

      A lot of watches might surprise you!

  • @TechTokOffical
    @TechTokOffical 11 месяцев назад +2

    The only reason the "beep" stopped when u took the back off was because the lil round thing that looks like a sticker on the inside of the case IS the beep "speaker." There is either a spring stickin out the back of the module or a piece of metal connected to the module makes the circuit connection complete

  • @pierrearagon
    @pierrearagon Год назад +12

    Wow, that is incredible. I had an suspicion that it would go beyond the WR rating but I didn’t think it would be that much.
    Now I’m curious if applies to just their resin cases or if the metal cases (A1000 series) would perform similarly.

    • @willegalvao9109
      @willegalvao9109 Год назад +3

      They are basically the same. This entry level metal casios are made of resin with a special paint on it.

    • @drfat
      @drfat Год назад

      ​@@willegalvao9109a1000 is fully stainless steel, not chrome-plated resin as a158, a168, etc.

    • @e28forever30
      @e28forever30 11 месяцев назад

      @@willegalvao9109
      The A1000 has a metal case, as the OP stated.

  • @sorinbunea471
    @sorinbunea471 Год назад +2

    Amazing, i just order this Casio watch today after seeing this video..a lot of value for the money

  • @danzigrulze5211
    @danzigrulze5211 Год назад +2

    As long as I know I can go swimming, long boarding, and surfing with my cheaper Casio watches, then I'm happy with that.

  • @stockedrice8340
    @stockedrice8340 10 месяцев назад +2

    my friend used to swim in salt water with this and it still works

    • @StardustLegacyFighter
      @StardustLegacyFighter 9 месяцев назад

      It's not an issue at all, you just need to wash the watch with tap water afterwards.

  • @MyVideosWillCalmU
    @MyVideosWillCalmU Год назад +5

    This was crazy interesting 😅...been subbed a while, you make some excellent content. This was fun.👌🏾

  • @kingfisher65
    @kingfisher65 11 месяцев назад +1

    bro risk his face from possible exploding pressure chamber. Just amazing Casio watches

  • @josesousa272
    @josesousa272 11 месяцев назад +1

    That's very impressive Engineering there!😮

  • @wastedaga1n
    @wastedaga1n Год назад +4

    Fantastic video! Excellent work. Great job.

  • @notdaneatall
    @notdaneatall Месяц назад

    Just browsed reddit for this watch to see if I should get for swimming in pools. They told me I can barely take it under the shower. Thanks for proving em wrong.

  • @spex.official
    @spex.official 10 месяцев назад +1

    Give the LCD a bit of heat with a lighter so the lcd layers can separate again, should work fine after that.

  • @shaikahmed2586
    @shaikahmed2586 10 месяцев назад +6

    I bought a casio just because of this video...Respect ...

  • @JS-ev4xc
    @JS-ev4xc 11 месяцев назад +1

    Swiss brands 30m WR is literally splash proof. But from your video, Casio 30m WR is truly 30m or more water proof. No wonder I can wear my F91W for 30min laps swimming regularly & wondering why it still functions.

  • @kdub2538
    @kdub2538 11 месяцев назад +1

    I think it waa the hydraulic press channel, but someone made a similar video with a g-shock casio (rated to 200m) and it went to around 600m before failure. So needless to say casio makes good product

  • @tomcocchiaro3997
    @tomcocchiaro3997 2 месяца назад +1

    Hey Harrison, any chance of running a depth test on another Casio--the super cool Red Casio G-Shock G7900A-4 Tide Watch which is rated at 200M. Thanks.

  • @tennbones
    @tennbones 6 месяцев назад

    Enjoyed your video, I am wearing that same $20 Casio as I type this. Casio is leaps and bounds better than any other watch brand. It ceases to amaze me. Good demonstration!

  • @MikoYotsuya292
    @MikoYotsuya292 10 месяцев назад

    Doing this experiment, near all your expensive gadgets. not only that, without any form of safety equipment! Respect! 😱😱😱

  • @Kairosdex
    @Kairosdex 11 месяцев назад +1

    Could you try this with a cheap 30m analogue watch? I'm curious if a push-pull crown can go beyond 30M without breaking!

  • @0hleg
    @0hleg 9 месяцев назад

    Thanks I needed this to know if I can swim to the bottom of my 200m pool and back up without breaking my watch.

  • @debaia
    @debaia 2 месяца назад +1

    ok 30m but how many time at this pressure...diving session is about 45mn..not sure it resist 45mn with such pressure

  • @4by_yotaguy373
    @4by_yotaguy373 11 месяцев назад +1

    That Casio is savage 😮😮🎉

  • @user-dl5oe3it4k
    @user-dl5oe3it4k Год назад +1

    Modern Watches: Oh no water!!!
    $30 Casio: I am happy to go swimming🙂

  • @badumskee2012
    @badumskee2012 Год назад +3

    Could you try this with the Casio W86? I'm very curious as its basically a modern and better version of the F91 while still keeping that charming movement in addition to the upgraded light

  • @stefanoballiero8319
    @stefanoballiero8319 Год назад +1

    The interesting thing is that being electronic you could easily modify it to make it "without limits", just fill it with petroleum jelly oil.

    • @Rick-ve5lx
      @Rick-ve5lx 10 месяцев назад +1

      I tried an oil mod on an F91 but oil leaked out when I pressed the buttons.

  • @Das_Teej
    @Das_Teej Год назад +2

    Dang, the F91w literally just keeps amazing me, who knew that I would’ve got so much bang for buck ($13/Amazon)

    • @SidBonkers51
      @SidBonkers51 11 месяцев назад

      it was an A158W but I dont suppose an F91W would perform any different.

    • @Das_Teej
      @Das_Teej 9 месяцев назад

      @@SidBonkers51yea, only difference is the chrome plating (still resin case), stainless steel band, and the lugs are not hooded.

  • @zakkandsurajmusic
    @zakkandsurajmusic 11 месяцев назад +1

    When Casio prints WR on its wristwatches, it stands for World Record.

  • @christopherjohnson4276
    @christopherjohnson4276 Год назад

    Absolutely tough as nails. I'm never afraid to get my Casio's wet, they're just amazing. ❤

  • @alanaliyev456GT
    @alanaliyev456GT 7 месяцев назад

    Im really (good )surprised ! I was in total confidence for 150 feets(5 atm+1) but i never imagine theese astoning performance. For casio vintage ! Personally i just watch hands with Casio vintage no more ! FOR SEE BATH I HAVE mdv 107 and mtd 1053 20 atm certified

  • @QuickStrikes84
    @QuickStrikes84 5 месяцев назад

    Funny, I was wearing the illuminator version of this watch when the video popped up.

  • @Don008Ramon
    @Don008Ramon 11 месяцев назад +1

    Lol that Casio is literally on my wrist right now, good to know it will survive a zombie apocalypse flood

  • @alialiev7482
    @alialiev7482 Месяц назад

    Thank you for this videis. Very helpful, now im not afraid to buy regular casio.

  • @emrahcebeci5134
    @emrahcebeci5134 11 месяцев назад +1

    I think the buttons are the problem. The watch stands the pressure but if you attempt to operate the buttons, water goes in

  • @JavierBonillaC
    @JavierBonillaC 11 месяцев назад

    I wouldn't like to see you stop at 90 m. Which is three times what it was expected to withstand. Very good video thank you very much.

  • @mikel.laughridge9480
    @mikel.laughridge9480 Год назад

    thanks for this. I just got me a Casio A168W 5 days ago. Nice to know this informaton.

  • @MorbidCrow666
    @MorbidCrow666 Месяц назад

    Of course it would stop beeping if you took the back off, most digital watches have a very small spring that touches the back which aides with the beeping.

  • @howardmaryon
    @howardmaryon 2 месяца назад

    If I found myself at 600 feet under water, knowing what the time is is far down on my priorities list.

  • @thisisnothere14
    @thisisnothere14 11 месяцев назад +1

    I'd love to see you test the mrw200h and see how far that can go!

  • @RetroPlus
    @RetroPlus 10 месяцев назад +2

    If you're 210 meters underwater i think you'll have bigger issues than your watch breaking

  • @pb6839
    @pb6839 10 месяцев назад

    I played in the gulf of mexico everyday for atleast 5-6 summers as a kid with an f91-w that was already 10 years old whhen I got it. Still works to this day although the screen is so scratched you cant read anymore

    • @HarrisonElmore
      @HarrisonElmore  10 месяцев назад

      They're beasts! That's a cool story!

  • @MrCarguy427
    @MrCarguy427 Год назад +1

    Interesting video! I was worried about surfing with my Casio. Not anymore

  • @andrewe.8321
    @andrewe.8321 11 месяцев назад

    I have an a700 Casio. One of the toughest watches ever for under 30 bucks.

  • @skd
    @skd 8 месяцев назад

    I have about 45 Casio watches in my collection (including the 158 you just killed). Amazing watches, you can't go wrong when buying a Casio. Any Casio.

  • @Blue0000FF
    @Blue0000FF 11 месяцев назад

    8:49. You're laughin', you're laughin'. The watch is broken and you're laughin'.

  • @aradgouklani2239
    @aradgouklani2239 11 месяцев назад

    this video single handedly convinced me to buy a casio

  • @JL-zl7de
    @JL-zl7de Год назад +1

    Its the A158?

  • @itstommyv6895
    @itstommyv6895 Год назад

    RUclips: I wonder if it will survive the advertised 30m.
    Watch @40m: *beep* its 11o clock dude

  • @GermanMassa
    @GermanMassa 7 месяцев назад +1

    Now we are left with the doubt of how much the Apple Watch resists... Casio Forever!!!

  • @thomashuller8099
    @thomashuller8099 Год назад

    Great video very well done. I know why I've been wearing Casio and G-Shock watches for 30 years.

  • @stillanonymous.8770
    @stillanonymous.8770 10 месяцев назад

    Thanks for convincing me to buy a A158, just got it😂

  • @mickmouse3513
    @mickmouse3513 11 месяцев назад +1

    Interesting video 👍👍

  • @balazsszomor5964
    @balazsszomor5964 7 месяцев назад +2

    Too bad for poor Casio! 😟

  • @doyalkumar3384
    @doyalkumar3384 6 месяцев назад

    It would be interesting to see this test repeated after hydromodding the same model.