$30 Casio = 600ft Under Water?!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 376

  • @HarrisonElmore
    @HarrisonElmore  2 года назад +138

    As a note: ISO22810 is the spec all watches have to meet. Dress watches up to dive watches. It’s designed to address ambiguity of water resistance in ‘watches, so yes, your watch meets those specific depths. Obviously most of us aren’t comfortable trying it, but they are. 🎉

    • @johnw6613
      @johnw6613 Год назад +5

      hey man could you do the same test with a timex weekender i dont have faith there build quality will stand up to the 30 m wr rating

    • @yosuhimekawa9053
      @yosuhimekawa9053 Год назад

      Even the vintage ones?

    • @AntoniWeller
      @AntoniWeller Год назад

      @@yosuhimekawa9053no, also seals will age and deteriorate causing the wr to lower

    • @spencergeorge4941
      @spencergeorge4941 Год назад +1

      @@yosuhimekawa9053I think he meant to say all watches that are marked as water resistant (which is a vast majority of them). There are, of course, many watches that aren’t water resistant, or aren’t tested to the ISO spec, but may have some resistance anyway despite not being labeled as such.

    • @TheChzoronzon
      @TheChzoronzon Год назад +4

      Dude... you REALLY have a problem with counting... and with coherence and safety: "the tank is rated for 100m, and I don't want it to explode in my face", then you proceed to go DOUBLE that while putting your eyes super close...
      What a champ :D

  • @e28forever30
    @e28forever30 Год назад +267

    Casio delivers.
    No BS, no fancy talk, just down to earth, affordable quality stuff.
    Love it.

    • @HarrisonElmore
      @HarrisonElmore  Год назад +12

      Couldn't agree more!

    • @Drownedinblood
      @Drownedinblood 10 месяцев назад +9

      I wish more companies were like casio....taking something traditionally luxury and making it available for everyone and super durable.

  • @barryvercueil2346
    @barryvercueil2346 2 года назад +717

    This video just convinced 100 people to buy a Casio. They owe you commission man!!!!

    • @nkonig1
      @nkonig1 2 года назад +40

      Yep. Proof that they live up to their God Tier status! I think this gives me confidence to wear mine a little rougher now.

    • @SurgingApocalypse
      @SurgingApocalypse Год назад +10

      Jokes on you I already own 1😂

    • @techmadgeek
      @techmadgeek Год назад +15

      101...I'm on the way to the shop now.

    • @Walter_Sobchak_43
      @Walter_Sobchak_43 Год назад +4

      Maybe because they are so affordable, but I usually take my Casio swimming instead of my actual dive watches. Never had a problem. 😅😂

    • @rasellink6875
      @rasellink6875 Год назад

      😂😂😂😂😂

  • @ambientblue-eyedmonkey8849
    @ambientblue-eyedmonkey8849 Год назад +165

    2:39 you're 40 meters down below trapped and about to run out of oxygen and your casio watch beeps to tell you it's 11 o'clock.

  • @graveyardz56
    @graveyardz56 11 месяцев назад +55

    Apple : *throwing tantrum at 40m*
    Casio : 'hey man it's 11 am'

  • @TheFailingBoat
    @TheFailingBoat Год назад +94

    I go surfing in the north sea almost every week and I always wear the same f91w while surfing for at least 7 years now, and it is still going strong.

    • @3vamtb
      @3vamtb Год назад +3

      I use the same, but for mountaineering since 2014 and it still works like day 1.

    • @yashrajsrgm
      @yashrajsrgm Год назад +6

      And people right here saying "I want sea master just for my swimming!" Lol

    • @Unlucky1776
      @Unlucky1776 Год назад +3

      @@yashrajsrgmI mean I want a seamaster regardless

    • @jackjackmillar
      @jackjackmillar Год назад +1

      In Scotland?

    • @yashrajsrgm
      @yashrajsrgm Год назад +5

      @@Unlucky1776 bro 💀 it's your choice anyways. For some people like me, watch is just a tool and if $30 gets me what I want, then why not 🤷‍♂️

  • @shawnlavigne9069
    @shawnlavigne9069 2 года назад +400

    I'm surprised. I knew it could go the full 30. But 200 is incredible.

    • @HarrisonElmore
      @HarrisonElmore  2 года назад +36

      I was not expecting it either!

    • @philipcooper8297
      @philipcooper8297 Год назад +13

      No need to be surprised. It's 30m in real life conditions, such as washing hands and swimming. The resistance of water while you swim puts way more pressure on the watch case than when you just let it sit in a tank like that.

    • @TheChzoronzon
      @TheChzoronzon Год назад +25

      ​@@philipcooper8297 I doubt very, very much that the most violent swimming movements could account for even one more atmosphere of pressure, not even close...and he went 17 more
      Do you have any link or study that says that swimming movements can produce such forces?

    • @philipcooper8297
      @philipcooper8297 Год назад +2

      @@TheChzoronzon Do you understand hydrodynamics?

    • @gjeraldh2989
      @gjeraldh2989 Год назад +20

      @@philipcooper8297 i don't, it would be helpful if you could elaborate.

  • @jacobduran8997
    @jacobduran8997 Год назад +126

    I had no idea it could go down to such depths below sea level and still function as intended! One of the reason why I will forever trust Casio's brand!

    • @arpanmahapatra342
      @arpanmahapatra342 Год назад +19

      You'd be dead before the watch

    • @jacobduran8997
      @jacobduran8997 Год назад +11

      @@arpanmahapatra342 I have no plans on going into such depths myself. I just think it's cool that it can resist such high pressure.

    • @Bljat47
      @Bljat47 Год назад

      ​@@arpanmahapatra342if you loose casio watch and find it after 10 years it will still have like half the battery. My is still working after 5 years on cheapest battery you can find

    • @Unlucky1776
      @Unlucky1776 Год назад

      @@arpanmahapatra342that’s true as well because it is a quartz watch so it’ll probab outlast us all

    • @randomcow505
      @randomcow505 Год назад +4

      friend of mines f91w got it in the screen by a police training paint marker round and survived, the plastic cover was fucked up, but you could still see the watch ticking away
      the marker rounds are no joke either, one of them tore straight through the webbing on my hand.
      we also found one that had been buried for god knows how long in the dirt in a 10cm deep muddy puddle, only reason we found it was because the fucking alarm went off and we got bollocked for having alarms set 😂

  • @deepfinds
    @deepfinds Год назад +42

    As a keen metal detector enthusiast, I've found dozens of wrist watches in the ocean. From $1 to $1800 watches. The ONLY, and I mean literally, the only watches that ever survive the roughest surf conditions are Casio watches. They are unkillable. They can be slammed on rocks, buries meters below sand and tumbled for years and not die. I found one last night with a flat battery, been there at least a few years. I guarantee it'll work with a new battery. lol

    • @adrian_certified
      @adrian_certified 10 месяцев назад +3

      Did it work??

    • @deepfinds
      @deepfinds 10 месяцев назад

      yep lmao@@adrian_certified

    • @damyr
      @damyr 10 месяцев назад +3

      Does it work?

    • @DrSpaceman42
      @DrSpaceman42 29 дней назад

      Nothing like a Casio!

    • @SunChipss
      @SunChipss 15 дней назад

      So… did it work?

  • @Makul-rt4sz
    @Makul-rt4sz Год назад +51

    I had casio rated as WR(lowest rating) only, wich means good enough for washing hands only..I used it for swimming for years and never had any issues with it..casio's are capable far more then they claim

  • @matthewblome6547
    @matthewblome6547 2 года назад +117

    I have been diving in the Red Sea with exactly that Casio down to 40m. No problems, also years later. I have also dived with a F91W down to the same depths, also no problems. Wish I had the confidence in my other 30m WR watches. It is so confusing to consumers, as dress watches that are 30m WR cannot possibly do that

    • @predragjo5977
      @predragjo5977 Год назад +11

      I'd say that the case material contributes a lot to WR. Its made of resin and the resin compresses under the pressure.

    • @noisepuppet
      @noisepuppet Год назад +3

      I've been wondering if pushing the buttons at that depth could let some water in. Do you use the buttons at depth?

    • @dnichl
      @dnichl Год назад +9

      ​@@noisepuppetit will let water in for sure. it's just a few o rings that fit around the buttons. at that depth it would unseat, let out the air and not seal again. never operate buttons under water. same goes for water resistance rated physical phone buttons.

    • @dnichl
      @dnichl Год назад +11

      reminds me of a video where somebody put their f91w on a cruise ship anchor or fishing net or something at let it go down 100m+. came back fully functional with zero water ingress.

  • @TheGrenadier97
    @TheGrenadier97 2 года назад +50

    Safe pressure rating on the vintage 30m Casios is definitely deeper than what's stated, and i don't think most other brands have that same degree of reliability. It's as if Casio deliberately overbuilt the resistance. However, i've always thought that digital quartz are inherently more robust; i'm curious as to how analogs like MQ-24 and MTP-1095 (a dress watch) can hold against pressure.

    • @Bljat47
      @Bljat47 Год назад +1

      Sony. They lower their specs soo much on paper

  • @ignaciopadilla5150
    @ignaciopadilla5150 2 года назад +52

    Great video! Thank you for sacrificing a God Tier watch in proof that Casio 30m water resistance over passes its statement. Other fancy and expensive watches that claim 30m you can barely wash your hands with them. You showed this Casio did not just surpassed its WR ratings but also was submerged in water for a long period of time.

    • @HarrisonElmore
      @HarrisonElmore  2 года назад +6

      Agreed! It was far better than I expected.

  • @timemeasured9137
    @timemeasured9137 2 года назад +60

    If you’re gonna go digital go Casio!!!! Can’t go wrong. We all need at least one digital in the collection.

    • @HarrisonElmore
      @HarrisonElmore  2 года назад +9

      Agreed!

    • @rhdtv2002
      @rhdtv2002 Год назад +6

      One?😊

    • @hehehexpresso
      @hehehexpresso Год назад +5

      Only one? You need them all!

    • @Loneace85
      @Loneace85 8 месяцев назад +3

      I have at least 5 digitals 😂

    • @ikupsugiarto
      @ikupsugiarto 2 месяца назад +4

      That's what I said to myself before I got my A158. A few weeks later I had 3 Casio digitals :)

  • @ianmaw66
    @ianmaw66 2 года назад +15

    If it's like G-shocks I opened the back is holds the buzzer so it is not surprising that the buzzer stopped when you removed the back. There is often a tiny spring which makes electrical contact. Excellent video, thanks.

  • @dtuk22
    @dtuk22 Год назад +19

    I Love this....proof that a $30 watch is better than ridiculously expensive watches. I couldn't fine a direct comparison but thats a greater depth than two Statue of Libertys stacked.

    • @fuckgoogle6091
      @fuckgoogle6091 Год назад +1

      So water resistance is the only metric to judge a watch on?🤣

    • @fuckgoogle6091
      @fuckgoogle6091 Год назад +1

      So the James Cameron deep sea Rolex is the best watch ever made by taht logic 🤡

  • @huckinator
    @huckinator 2 года назад +12

    This was an awesome showcase! One watch that comes to mind is the Hamilton khaki king. I own one and never once have ever thought about 50m of water resistance being too little. Then you watch a review of it and that’s on almost all of the negatives list for it. I think crazy water resistance requirements for a watch to be “good” is ridiculous.

  • @nojburns
    @nojburns Год назад +10

    I believe the watch stopped beeping because you took off the case back. There is a very thin speaker on the inside of Casio case backs. This is electrified by a small spring that comes out of the movement and connects to the speaker. If the spring is still in the movement (they're very easy to lose) and you put the case back back on, I'm certain the speaker would continue to produce your beep.

  • @GottaGeek
    @GottaGeek Год назад +87

    There's a very good chance the beeping stopped when you removed the back plate, because the back plate contains the speaker. Which just happens to look like a sticker.

    • @SidBonkers51
      @SidBonkers51 Год назад +4

      I didnt know that, thanx.

    • @GottaGeek
      @GottaGeek Год назад +11

      @@SidBonkers51 there's a little Golden spring that goes through the movement and kind of pokes out to be able to touch the backplate when it's in place so it could also be a missing or bent spring

    • @Marin_Sp
      @Marin_Sp Год назад +2

      It's piezo speaker.

    • @GottaGeek
      @GottaGeek Год назад +1

      @MarinSperanda I know but most don't so I usually refer to it by just stating that it's a speaker.

  • @General_Mills_
    @General_Mills_ Год назад +4

    The caseback is used as the resonator for the piezo (beep), so it has to be assembled for it to work. You can actually delete the beep by putting a piece of tape on the inside of the caseback before reassembly.

  • @michaeldemarillac9992
    @michaeldemarillac9992 Год назад +4

    I went diving for my yacht mooring while wearing my CASIO - W800H-1AV | Black Digital Watch. I bought it when a guy said this was all he needed when travelling around Australia. The only reason I don't wear it diving anymore is because I had a crazy elevator door in Malaysia, close on my wrist watch and it ripped one of the holes holding the strap spring bar. It could pop out at any time and fall of my wrist now. Best watch I had ever owned.

  • @funkmonkeyfun
    @funkmonkeyfun Год назад +7

    One of my beater watches is my favorite F91w, after years I still swim with it, fish with it take steaming hot showers and I have never had condensation or water penetration, tough little watch. I have had a ton of 50 meter water resistance watch like armatron fail in a pool or shower.

  • @recon9640
    @recon9640 Год назад +4

    Best watch for the money. I've owned many casios, never had one single issue. Good video

  • @markloubser2433
    @markloubser2433 2 года назад +8

    Got to hand it to Casio! Ive been diving with a Duro for years, no issues. Wouldnt want to do it with my more expensive watches...

  • @brett233
    @brett233 2 года назад +16

    I’ve seen stuff like this before and I’d be confident taking any Casio with at least 30m WR swimming. Mostly because they are cheap, I wouldn’t take that risk with any expensive mechanical watch with less than 100m of WR.

  • @Bigfish1day
    @Bigfish1day Год назад +11

    Casio watches are really better than people think. I have a G-Shock solar that has been working for 14 years, I daily wore it for 13 years so far.

    • @e28forever30
      @e28forever30 Год назад +4

      I own a 15 year old Riseman, which still charges and syncs perfectly.
      Awesome watches.

    • @badd.syntaxx
      @badd.syntaxx 6 месяцев назад

      hi how was the tough solar power? is it still high? or did ypi managed to changed its rechargeable battery?

  • @dmc6617
    @dmc6617 Год назад +11

    I don t think that every push of the lever equals to 2m as being a constant in this experiment. It may be that with the rising preassure, every lever push would provide less and less additional preassure as the air density inside the glass chamber rises. You should have used an actual gage with sufficient measuring capabilities for your experiment. On the other hand is clear that the little Casio behaved admirably and got well beyond its rating. But i don t think the high depth numbers are accurate in this experiment, unfortunately. I m 90% sure that the rate of preasure increasing per one lever pull is not a constant variable. Good luck!

  • @deatheater4805
    @deatheater4805 2 года назад +12

    Holy shit... I bought this same watch a week ago. Little did i know this is some god tier stuff🙌

  • @-----REDACTED-----
    @-----REDACTED----- 10 месяцев назад +1

    So…I don’t know if it’s universal, but a mechanical engineer once told me that components usually have a designed safety margin of at least around three times the official rating.
    So while I wouldn’t expect it I wouldn’t be surprised if the actual failure point of the watch were to be around 90m…
    Edit:
    Well, I am impressed by that watch.

  • @techmadgeek
    @techmadgeek Год назад +4

    Beeper requires case back to function. You will probably find beeps will return if you were the replace case back.Great Video, thanks for posting.

  • @ed342
    @ed342 Год назад +7

    One thing to keep in mind is operating the buttons under water, I went into a swimming pool with an F91W a few years ago and the screen fogged up, could've been me fiddling with it underwater or something else, but I don't trust anything less than 50m anymore. Whilst there are people here who have been surfing, diving etc with an F91 or similar, those that break probably just discard it and get a G-Shock or other watch.

    • @HobkinBoi
      @HobkinBoi Год назад +2

      Generally you're not supposed to push the buttons/pull the crown on watches while they're underwater.

    • @badd.syntaxx
      @badd.syntaxx 6 месяцев назад

      probably you got a fake one 😅

  • @reghudson5444
    @reghudson5444 Месяц назад +1

    I’ve owned many Casios and never had any of them leak. I didn’t baby them either. Swimming, rain, in the shower occasionally. They are truly great little watches.

  • @mattkinsella9856
    @mattkinsella9856 Год назад +1

    I just left a comment on another watch video saying that although I own a range of watches, some quite rare and expensive, I often just put on one of my Casio watches because they are great for everyday use and I never stress about them because they are almost indestructible and even if I did damage it, then I can replace it with the cash in my pocket. This video just proves my point but to the extreme!

  • @notdaneatall
    @notdaneatall 3 месяца назад +1

    Just browsed reddit for this watch to see if I should get for swimming in pools. They told me I can barely take it under the shower. Thanks for proving em wrong.

  • @dp2418
    @dp2418 Год назад +2

    bought my first cheap casio when i was 10, lady said u'll go to college and still wear it. she was right:) casios are bulletproof

  • @alignedguide6553
    @alignedguide6553 Год назад +9

    I'm the type of person to take off my G-Shock while washing hands and he's out here simulating scuba diving with one of their cheapest watches, really made me think

    • @StardustLegacyFighter
      @StardustLegacyFighter 11 месяцев назад +1

      Wtf dude, nobody I know takes off their mechanical watches when washing their hands, let alone a G-Shock.

    • @reaper-sz5tm
      @reaper-sz5tm Месяц назад +1

      My g shock goes with me for all of my ocean swims and dives down to 50 feet, it’ll handle washing hands just fine man

    • @alignedguide6553
      @alignedguide6553 Месяц назад +1

      @@reaper-sz5tm I'm sure it would, just hate the idea of getting my watches wet.

    • @Aurora-bv1ys
      @Aurora-bv1ys 28 дней назад

      Bruh, the G Shock will work after 2873782183812 years

  • @ArcticSeraph
    @ArcticSeraph Год назад +8

    Makes me wonder how much the Casio A1000 can take since the crystal is mineral glass and not resin

  • @TechTokOffical
    @TechTokOffical Год назад +2

    The only reason the "beep" stopped when u took the back off was because the lil round thing that looks like a sticker on the inside of the case IS the beep "speaker." There is either a spring stickin out the back of the module or a piece of metal connected to the module makes the circuit connection complete

  • @alanaliyev456GT
    @alanaliyev456GT Год назад +6

    20 atm is enormous for this type of chamber... most transparent test chamber not exceed 10atm

  • @nancybasel
    @nancybasel Год назад +1

    My Casio peeped at the hour mark just seconds before yours and when I heard yours I was preplaxed why my watch peeped twice 😂😂

  • @tacticaltruth8118
    @tacticaltruth8118 Месяц назад

    That is really impressive. Great job Casio. Thank you, Harrison, for this experiment.

  • @droobie827
    @droobie827 Год назад +4

    This would be a cool test to try on a cheap seiko 5 or even better Ali express dive watches

  • @badumskee2012
    @badumskee2012 Год назад +3

    Could you try this with the Casio W86? I'm very curious as its basically a modern and better version of the F91 while still keeping that charming movement in addition to the upgraded light

  • @iihchindiiko
    @iihchindiiko Год назад +1

    I have similar variant that I used for more than a decade. It was tortured so much that the front was scrapped from bailing in asphalt. now I have my gshock for 6yrs. I mean the way I wore my watch. I only remove it when I take bath. hahaha I do labor work, chemicals, bailing from skate and longboard, swimming, sometime hitting on steel corners when at site. That's the same reason why I prefer casio than an expensive watch that decreases the value if I use it the same way. 😅

  • @RedEye737
    @RedEye737 Год назад +11

    When you think you know casio, it just reminds you it's the opposite. Awesome video man

  • @connorhaggett9668
    @connorhaggett9668 Год назад +4

    “I want to get the watch to break before the tank does” Casio is the best

  • @lakshbhambhani8565
    @lakshbhambhani8565 Год назад +7

    Incredibly dangerous to push the tank that far off its rated for 100m 🙈

    • @TheChzoronzon
      @TheChzoronzon Год назад +5

      And putting his uncovered eyes close to the glass while at it... I was shaking my head all the time, the guy has a real problem with both counting and common sense :facepalm:

  • @augustocanosa785
    @augustocanosa785 Год назад +2

    So, basically any casio is a diver watch lol. Good video, dude

  • @pierrearagon
    @pierrearagon 2 года назад +12

    Wow, that is incredible. I had an suspicion that it would go beyond the WR rating but I didn’t think it would be that much.
    Now I’m curious if applies to just their resin cases or if the metal cases (A1000 series) would perform similarly.

    • @willegalvao9109
      @willegalvao9109 Год назад +3

      They are basically the same. This entry level metal casios are made of resin with a special paint on it.

    • @drfat
      @drfat Год назад

      ​@@willegalvao9109a1000 is fully stainless steel, not chrome-plated resin as a158, a168, etc.

    • @e28forever30
      @e28forever30 Год назад

      @@willegalvao9109
      The A1000 has a metal case, as the OP stated.

  • @spex.official
    @spex.official Год назад +1

    Give the LCD a bit of heat with a lighter so the lcd layers can separate again, should work fine after that.

  • @JohnnyUtah-qi7fn
    @JohnnyUtah-qi7fn 2 месяца назад +1

    Results will vary. I took the same watch swimming in the sea, no free diving or anything, and it was filled with water after half an hour.

  • @a.m.7739
    @a.m.7739 2 года назад +5

    That’s pretty incredible. Do it with you explorer now!! Kidding. Great work. Keep it up, sir

    • @HarrisonElmore
      @HarrisonElmore  2 года назад +3

      Hahaha I’ll get right on that! I’m sure I could explain that to the insurance company!

    • @mojaal
      @mojaal 2 года назад +1

      @@HarrisonElmore No risk if you test it with just the case and crystal. Take the movement and dial out

  • @tomcocchiaro3997
    @tomcocchiaro3997 5 месяцев назад +1

    Hey Harrison, any chance of running a depth test on another Casio--the super cool Red Casio G-Shock G7900A-4 Tide Watch which is rated at 200M. Thanks.

  • @yamiii1776
    @yamiii1776 4 месяца назад

    I’ve stopped surfing, swimming and paddling with my Seamaster. I now unapologetically go with my blue Casio F91W and it’s been superb!

  • @sorinbunea471
    @sorinbunea471 2 года назад +2

    Amazing, i just order this Casio watch today after seeing this video..a lot of value for the money

  • @Kairosdex
    @Kairosdex Год назад +1

    Could you try this with a cheap 30m analogue watch? I'm curious if a push-pull crown can go beyond 30M without breaking!

  • @stockedrice8340
    @stockedrice8340 Год назад +2

    my friend used to swim in salt water with this and it still works

    • @StardustLegacyFighter
      @StardustLegacyFighter 11 месяцев назад

      It's not an issue at all, you just need to wash the watch with tap water afterwards.

  • @tennbones
    @tennbones 8 месяцев назад

    Enjoyed your video, I am wearing that same $20 Casio as I type this. Casio is leaps and bounds better than any other watch brand. It ceases to amaze me. Good demonstration!

  • @josesousa272
    @josesousa272 Год назад +1

    That's very impressive Engineering there!😮

  • @Don008Ramon
    @Don008Ramon Год назад +2

    Lol that Casio is literally on my wrist right now, good to know it will survive a zombie apocalypse flood

  • @Tech101yt
    @Tech101yt Год назад +3

    seriously impressive, it outlasted the rated depth of a g-shock!

  • @MyVideosWillCalmU
    @MyVideosWillCalmU 2 года назад +5

    This was crazy interesting 😅...been subbed a while, you make some excellent content. This was fun.👌🏾

  • @MikoYotsuya292
    @MikoYotsuya292 Год назад

    Doing this experiment, near all your expensive gadgets. not only that, without any form of safety equipment! Respect! 😱😱😱

  • @debaia
    @debaia 5 месяцев назад +1

    ok 30m but how many time at this pressure...diving session is about 45mn..not sure it resist 45mn with such pressure

  • @JS-ev4xc
    @JS-ev4xc Год назад +1

    Swiss brands 30m WR is literally splash proof. But from your video, Casio 30m WR is truly 30m or more water proof. No wonder I can wear my F91W for 30min laps swimming regularly & wondering why it still functions.

  • @wastedaga1n
    @wastedaga1n 2 года назад +4

    Fantastic video! Excellent work. Great job.

  • @gato23
    @gato23 Месяц назад

    side-note: NOT fucking with the buttons is what likely extend the watch's depth resistance. I can only imagine pushing the buttons under water would create openings for the water to enter the watch and deep rated or true dive watches have seals in and around the buttons to prevent that from happening in the first place.

  • @Amin_2k
    @Amin_2k Год назад +1

    I had this watch and i thought it was only splash resistant? never knew it could go to 30 meters or even more!

  • @thisisnothere14
    @thisisnothere14 Год назад +1

    I'd love to see you test the mrw200h and see how far that can go!

  • @emrahcebeci5134
    @emrahcebeci5134 Год назад +1

    I think the buttons are the problem. The watch stands the pressure but if you attempt to operate the buttons, water goes in

  • @JavierBonillaC
    @JavierBonillaC Год назад

    I wouldn't like to see you stop at 90 m. Which is three times what it was expected to withstand. Very good video thank you very much.

  • @NickNick-id8sb
    @NickNick-id8sb 2 года назад +5

    One of the best videos on casio I've seen (the other one is Teddy Baltassarre throwing G-SHOCKS out of a helicopter). This is probably the best review on the A158WA-1 without being a review. Awesome video. Great job.

    • @HarrisonElmore
      @HarrisonElmore  2 года назад

      Appreciate it! I found it very interesting!

  • @mikel.laughridge9480
    @mikel.laughridge9480 Год назад

    thanks for this. I just got me a Casio A168W 5 days ago. Nice to know this informaton.

  • @MorbidCrow666
    @MorbidCrow666 4 месяца назад

    Of course it would stop beeping if you took the back off, most digital watches have a very small spring that touches the back which aides with the beeping.

  • @kdub2538
    @kdub2538 Год назад +1

    I think it waa the hydraulic press channel, but someone made a similar video with a g-shock casio (rated to 200m) and it went to around 600m before failure. So needless to say casio makes good product

  • @GermanMassa
    @GermanMassa 10 месяцев назад +1

    Now we are left with the doubt of how much the Apple Watch resists... Casio Forever!!!

  • @Aetila
    @Aetila 8 месяцев назад

    Impressive test...thanks for the excellent demo!
    I wonder if other cheap brands can behave so well like this, like Skmei - 30 m ?

  • @danzigrulze5211
    @danzigrulze5211 Год назад +2

    As long as I know I can go swimming, long boarding, and surfing with my cheaper Casio watches, then I'm happy with that.

  • @MrAlperenfener
    @MrAlperenfener Год назад

    Retail shop says avoid to swim with this watch , but I have no idea about diving and swimming pressure difference.

  • @shaikahmed3__5
    @shaikahmed3__5 Год назад +6

    I bought a casio just because of this video...Respect ...

  • @4by_yotaguy373
    @4by_yotaguy373 Год назад +1

    That Casio is savage 😮😮🎉

  • @christopherjohnson4276
    @christopherjohnson4276 Год назад

    Absolutely tough as nails. I'm never afraid to get my Casio's wet, they're just amazing. ❤

  • @kingfisher65
    @kingfisher65 Год назад +1

    bro risk his face from possible exploding pressure chamber. Just amazing Casio watches

  • @JL-zl7de
    @JL-zl7de Год назад +1

    Its the A158?

  • @alialiev7482
    @alialiev7482 3 месяца назад

    Thank you for this videis. Very helpful, now im not afraid to buy regular casio.

  • @balazsszomor5964
    @balazsszomor5964 10 месяцев назад +2

    Too bad for poor Casio! 😟

  • @a16383
    @a16383 5 месяцев назад

    What are you using, exactly, to simulate the pressure? What's the name of the device (brand, model)?

  • @MrCarguy427
    @MrCarguy427 Год назад +1

    Interesting video! I was worried about surfing with my Casio. Not anymore

  • @СвятославКозак-я1д

    Modern Watches: Oh no water!!!
    $30 Casio: I am happy to go swimming🙂

  • @alanaliyev456GT
    @alanaliyev456GT 9 месяцев назад

    Im really (good )surprised ! I was in total confidence for 150 feets(5 atm+1) but i never imagine theese astoning performance. For casio vintage ! Personally i just watch hands with Casio vintage no more ! FOR SEE BATH I HAVE mdv 107 and mtd 1053 20 atm certified

  • @thomashuller8099
    @thomashuller8099 Год назад

    Great video very well done. I know why I've been wearing Casio and G-Shock watches for 30 years.

  • @ProfRaymond-ct7gx
    @ProfRaymond-ct7gx Год назад +1

    There are watches… and then there are Casios

  • @ThomasBjarnason
    @ThomasBjarnason Год назад

    That’s not my experience at all, my Casio stopped working after some light snorkeling - at most 3-4 meter. But that was 10 years ago, maybe they are better now or I had a bad example back then. I would recommend a G-Shock anyway if you’re planning on getting it wet.

  • @jamesblonde2271
    @jamesblonde2271 Год назад

    (late comment) I still have the Seiko5 I was wearing for my first three "fun" dives, hell itlooked like a dive watch😂 B4 the sub people used to dive with Oyster Perpetuals, my divemaster instructor wore a gmt to dive in.

  • @skd
    @skd 11 месяцев назад

    I have about 45 Casio watches in my collection (including the 158 you just killed). Amazing watches, you can't go wrong when buying a Casio. Any Casio.

  • @shomikoto7558
    @shomikoto7558 Год назад

    I don't understand did you put Apple watch and Casio watch together????

  • @stefanoballiero8319
    @stefanoballiero8319 Год назад +1

    The interesting thing is that being electronic you could easily modify it to make it "without limits", just fill it with petroleum jelly oil.

    • @Rick-ve5lx
      @Rick-ve5lx Год назад +1

      I tried an oil mod on an F91 but oil leaked out when I pressed the buttons.

  • @mickmouse3513
    @mickmouse3513 Год назад +1

    Interesting video 👍👍

  • @hansolo1367
    @hansolo1367 Год назад

    great video bro, you might want to buy a good quality safety googles for similar tests in future.

  • @ALPHA-ly3cu
    @ALPHA-ly3cu 6 месяцев назад +1

    What's watch name in video