Charles & Anne: In the Shadow of the Crown (2024) | Full Documentary
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 фев 2024
- Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @royaltytvyoutube
The current British monarchy is a glorious one, but it has also been a shaky one. 1992 was a year of disrepute for the Royal Family. Princess Anne, the Queen's only eldest daughter, and Prince Charles, first in line to the throne, paid a huge price for the preservation of a fragile monarchy, a price that had been foreordained from the moment they were born.
Find us on other platforms: linktr.ee/royalty.tv 
Развлечения
As an American, I really wish they would have a British person narrate British documentaries. The British accent is part of the charm of watching these.
Agree it is weird. Can’t watch it.
I think this is AI since some of the pronounciation is wrong. The narrator refers to Mountbatton as the "grand uncle' which is not a thing. He would be Chas Great uncle. And the story says Chas and D met in the mid 80s?
😅
As a Scandinavian, I agree. Except I don't find British English "charming". To Europeans, British English is the real English, while American is an accent without much charm.
@@cathal4921 As an American, I'm very pleased to invite this individual to stay in Scandanavia. There are several American accents, depending upon which part of the US you were raised in. Different parts of the British Isles also produce different accents. Being so pointlessly critical is not 'charming'.
I like Charles. I don’t he’s as bad as the media portrayed him to be. I hope he recovers from his illness ❤️🙏🏼❤️
Really not as bad as the media portrayed him?, married a girl he didn't love, cheated on her with his subordinates wife, used her as a breeding mare, harassed her mentally, cried when the public preferred her over him, supported pedophiles, sells honors for cash, takes money from human rights violators, the list goes on and on. Which part of his behaviors is not as bad as the media portrayed him?
Same here… I feel like he, Camilla, and Diana were put in an awful situation based on archaic rules!
The two Grannies who arranged the marriage of Lady Diana and Prince Charles, Lady Fermoy, friend and Lady in waiting to the Queen Mother ,Grandmother of Prince Charles. Weren't thinking thinking right at all character, age, intellect, intelligence, even music, they weren't compatible at all. They were both only thinking prestige and family.. Definately not the two most important people involved.
@@iriscollins7583 Why didn't Charles say no ? It really says a lot about his character and those that support him. He didn't care about Diana and he didn't care if he ruined her life. You people who play it off saying he had to marry someone are awful people and I hope someone in your family goes though the same as Diana.
@@annhewett9622 , you can’t really use non-royal Average Joe logic on relationships when it comes to a man in his 30s at the time saying no to his family on his choice of a wife. Any of us can say no to our family and to hell with how they react to our decision. But Charles, it was different. There were certain rules that royals have always been expected to follow… especially a future king’s choice of a wife. It sucks for both him and Diana that their marriage looked great on paper (she was a young virgin with no past in relationships), but turned out to be disastrous in reality. Royals have also married people they didn’t necessarily love for centuries! Lots of arranged royal marriages and spouses who couldn’t stand each other! Charles and Diana’s pitiful marriage is nothing earth shattering. When we look at royals, all we see on the surface is a nice wardrobe, living in palaces, fame and fortune, and we assume that they have the greatest lives. But they have to live with so many rules to appear to be that “perfect” and “ideal” family to lead the nation. I would find that kind of life to be very suffocating! Anyway, I got off in a tangent sort of. What all that has to do with Charles being able to say no to marrying her is that it’s not that simple. It’s not about his character… it’s the position that he was in as heir to the throne to pick the “right” bride. Eventually, the royals learned - and the hard way - that sometimes it’s not always best to push these marriages because it will backfire on them. Whether or not you like Camilla is irrelevant… she has been a great support to the King as a spouse should be. The way he and Diana clashed, I doubt she would’ve been that supportive of him. Anyway, that’s my take on why he couldn’t say no… it wasn’t that simple.
He proved to be a very worthy father after she had passed away .A worthier and more supportive father than his own has been to him.
Long Live His Majesty The King Charles III !
Most of this is spot on. I already knew just about all of it, but, yes, the world still needs to know much of this.
Charles still there fixing his cuff links in all the mayhem! 😂
If Keep Calm and Carry On was a person....
I personally want the king grants his sister the royal dukedom by her own rights.
Royal Ann, you hsve a U.S. Base here in the U.D.
U are a beautiful woman and highly intelligent.
Your mom would be oroud of you. She is shining down on u.
I have always admired Anne, not much on Charles, I do admire William and thankful he was born first
Anne is a diamond, she's got more balls than all the princes.
The commentator called Anne's second husband as Thomas, it's Timothy
He also referred to MountBatten as the Grand uncle which is not a thing.. It's Great uncle. I think this is AI
That was the most fair and complete coverage of Diana and Charles I’ve ever seen.
The Church of England was hilarious in its opposition to divorce and remarriage. Do they think we don't know their origin story?
Her Majesty, King Charles III and Her Royal Highness, Princess Anne...
Charles is not a woman
My king favorite and my princess favorite....
Oh god, once they said “ghost of Diana vilifies Charles today” is when I thought this whole documentary is rubbish
Charles is trying to live in the shadow of his own sins.
Queen knew this & and it's why she waited so long.
HAVE A LONG LIVE AND A LONG REGNE KING CHARLES. GOD SAVE YOU KING CHARLES.
34:46 a somewhat fork tongue woman who has no issues of lying to help the monarch's favour with the British public.
Frankly, the truth of Charles & Diana, is that it is down the middle. Truths & falsehoods on both sides. Just like it is in every marriage, that goes under. They were human.
Charles and his sister Anne ( spare ) are very close ❤
Get off the cats tail you have beaten this story to the ends of the earth
GOD SAVE THE KING.
LONG LIVE THE KING.
Poor Elizabeth to have to bear all these ceremonies for her Jubilee while she was slowly and painfully dying out of cancer .This is indignant .
I pulled this up because it was supposed to be about the relationship between Charles and Anne. Not Charles and Diana. We have plenty of those already, thank you very much.
Moving on.
Andrew Morton is shuch a slimmy man.
Equally so is Richard Kay.
Good documentary. It didn’t touch on Mountbatten’s escapades and I’m not sure about the Camilla part. Everyone loved Diana and are still, even now, sad about what happened to her.
She really was the Wallis Simpson of the time. Demanding the spotlight, throwing her children under the bus of the conflict between Charles and her. She would do something outrageous, look demure, and fools would dance.
Charles has been grown into the job .He reluctanctly waited for years to succeed his mother. He is King , loves his people but when he looks back on his pre written life in his golden prison he may wish to escape it all .
Heavy is the head that wear crown 👑
Growing up, I couldn’t stand Charles because of his treatment of Diana and his blatant adultery with Camilla. However, now that the Queen is gone, I’ve discovered that there’s more to Charles than what the media has showed us. Is he complicated ?, YES, but he has his reasons like most of us. I’m glad he’s finally King (Not here for Camilla, she’s a peasant) and I pray he pulls through this cancer diagnosis. Princess Anne, is sorely underrated and under appreciated in my opinion. She has a sense of Duty to the Crown that is nearly unmatched. Much respect to her for caring for her mother in her last years and her many contributions to charity.
amd diana had many affairs before chas went back to Cam
Tampons and Cowmilla are still disgusting 🤮
Nice of you to cut Charles some slack, but what is it with casting the "peasant" shade? You are also probably a peasant by your lights. Most of us non-royals are.
It's Jonathan Dimbleby, not Dimly. That is quite funny though!
Just goes to show how you can be tainted by the media
Who Knew he is such a great man
Arizona 🎉
Grateful 😅 I'm eating lemon/ blueberry coffee cake ...sometimes this does the trick 🍋🫐
Civility isn't dead is it?
Command "unswerving disobedience"??? @1:41. Who writes this stuff? Or, perhaps, who reads it?
Charles said he felt betrayed by her? GOD KNOWS UGLY! 🤔
You need to work out your bitterness, a bit. This marriage--Charles' and Dianas'--was not _your_ marriage. No need to get all emotional and take a side. I can not figure out why people who never met Diana want to advocate for her; she was just as rotten, if not even more rotten, toward Charles as he was towards her. She melted down on him, pushed, hit, and kicked him in front of witnesses, and slept with a parade of men (some of them married) before Charles divorced her. She is to blame for her own misfortune.
@@bnic9471 Relax, she's not to blame about anything. People are arguing on and on when they are unhappy and feeling trapped. Momentary acts of frustration cannot be use as an aliby, nor accuse Diana if was overwhelmed at some point.
Ps, I think Charles was equally not happy and obliged, so it's sad to overextent whose the bad or the good.
Maybe the custom to marry a good girl was to blame, perhaps not be open back then in the divorce.
Probably, another time and era.
Diana gave the House of Windsor a shot in the arm. Instead of being jealous of Diana's popularity, Charles could have taken pride in her virtues and reveled in her reflected glory. But Charles thought of himself as the main event and there was no room for sharing the spotlight. I don't know whether he asked Diana to show him more deference, but putting him first would have smoothed his ruffled feathers. The family made a mistake by cooling Charles' romance with Camilla. Charles and Diana needed to have a much longer engagement, which would have exposed his commitment to Camilla.
The continuation of Late QE2 legacy will continue with these two siblings. In sickness & pain. In spiritual poverty & distress. King Charles 3 & Princess Royale will stand strong till Prince William & Princess Catherine is realdy.
I mean who else is going to be villinized? Who else are people going to blame? It wasn't what Diana said about him or about Harry's book. Charles is the one who chose to propose to Diana without loving her. His friends were absolutely correct. That marriage was never going to work if he never intended to make it work. None of the rest would have ever happened, such as Harry writing a book, had he not married Diana. He brought that on himself 🤷♀️
Except, of course, Harry chose to write the book. Many people come from a home where the parents didn't 'love' each other, if you believe Charles didn't love her. (He did, of course). But not everyone who comes from a home like that chooses to go out and write a book that is full of half-truths and and serves no purpose but to whine and cry about how terrible their childhood was. Most people choose to grow up and move on with their life and, hopefully, do better than they think their parents did. But Charles marrying Diana didn't cause Sparry to write this book. He chose that all by his big, grown up, self.
@@pinkosmondfan Charles and Camilla were involved before and after Charles married Diana. It was more than Charles not loving Diana. He was involved with Camilla too. Camilla was also married with 2 kids herself when that was happening. You can't chalk this up to something like this happening all the time. Then Charles decided to marry Diana knowing this circus was happening and he did not love Diana. Why involve her in the first place? And you want to blame Diana and Harry for getting hurt? My entire point is that if Charles would have never even proposed to Diana, there would have been no Diana to say anything about him and no Harry to write a book. Charles brought that on to himself along with Camilla.
Camilla's family is not from nobility. Charles was expected to marry nobility; t'hat was his duty. Others in the family didn't want him to marry someone else who wasn't from nobility. Anne, being female and way down the succession, was able to marry more or less whoever, Charles, at that time, did not have that luxury. Charles was sent abroad. I can't remember if it was on behalf of the Queen as part of a diplomatic trip or with whichever of the armed forces he was in at the time. During this time, Camilla married Andrew Parker-Bowles. Probably only because Charles wasn't around. Diana was from nobility and single. It seemed to be that they were forced together.
@@Rhianalanthula No one forces a 32 year old to do anything. Charles would not have ever even been king had his great uncle, Edward VIII not abdicated. He went off to marry Wallis Simpson and did he care what anyone else wanted? There is no one else to blame but Charles. Blaming Diana because of what she said about him or Harry for writing a book is a cop out. You can't blame the people that his decision hurt.
I always wondered why Diana accepted so quickly without discussing with her family? Her Grandmother Fermoy was a Lady in Waiting for the old Queen. It's not like Diana didnt undertand the life style. No girfriends or sisters to discuss with? Diana had her ambition too
I’m sorry but every person alive must survive their parents! For all of his ,” sensitivity, and kindness” he still violated his marriage vows and tormented Diana, ( a troubled heart in her own right) I believe cherish is the word. Had he cherished her as his wife and the future Queen, this would be a different documentary altogether.💔 and to me (with no dog in the fight) looking on from the outside in, it looks like two people, Charles and Camilla selfish from the start, wanted what they wanted and ruined two families and their legacy to have it! Part of this forever divide is because you reap what you sow #teamDiana
Diana violated those vows right along with him. She was no angel. She gave at least as good as she got from him.
Their marriage was doomed from the start since they were as incompatible as two people could be. It would never have worked, with or without Camilla or Diana’s numerous lovers. It would have been torture for them both if they had kept up the charade just for the sake of not breaking their marriage vows. What is the point of two people staying together and feeling miserable ? That would be such a waste of precious life time.
Personally I don’t believe the narrative of the innocent princess who was the perfect loving wife and the cold hearted prince. They both made mistakes, they both suffered and lots of things only came out after Diana’s death.
I think it’s time to let bygones be bygones. Why do you have to be „team Diana“ or „team Charles“? A marriage failed, like millions of others. What exactly went on behind closed doors we will never know and frankly, it’s none of our business. If Diana had known how little time she had left, maybe she wouldn’t have lashed out at her husband and her in-laws the way she did. She gave her famous interviews at a time of great bitterness, which probably everyone feels when a marriage breaks down. Would she have acted in the same way if she had known that she would never be able to put her harsh words into perspective again and sound more conciliatory? I don't know.
Anyway, this all happened decades ago and Charles and Camilla have grown old together. Soon their journey will come to an end. Camilla has always been a great support to the King in a way Diana could never have been. Not because she was bad, but because she and Charles were not made for each other, they were not soulmates like he and Camilla obviously are. It’s not fair to reduce them to their failed marriages. They are so much more.
D cheater first. There were 4 inthe marriage.
@@maryk3458 At least😉
❤❤
The crown must win… must always win.
28:05 Elizabeth doesn't look impressed, maybe she knew just how insincere he was behind closed doors.
What about Prince Philip ? Who will dare talk about him ?
Royals males had the right to be openly adulterous or not .Some names come easily , Charles , his father , Andrew and it wasn't just unfaithfulness it was sex trade .
c possible davoir Un Documentair en francais merci
Charles needed to be widower to become king. It's not an opinion. It's a rule of the anglican church of which he is the head.
Elozabeth can be revered even though she faced the cameras in a new way. The others ... not so much
Yes, Diana and Charles got along a bit better towards the end of Diana's life, but, she ought to have publicly taken back what she had done to hurt him, damage his reputation, his good name. She never, never made reccompance. For that reason, I don't believe she was really a good person.
did he make recompense to her?
@@glen7318And to his sons. Charles and Camilla hurt Diana, William, and Harry. And Camilla her ex and her kids. Those two didn't care who they stepped on.
A Royal Cad. A Leech of A Bag of Bones.
Bless his heart
Unabashed propaganda promoting what's left of the elders of the British Monarchy. They need all the help they can get. The only thing missing is their super powers costumes and capes.
I wonder what thriller effect or prince vault may have known 😊
Посол Англии в Париже лорда Берти:
«Нет больше России! Она распалась. Если только нам удастся добиться независимости буферных государств, граничащих с Германией на Востоке, т. е. Финляндии, Польши, Эстонии, Украины и т. д., то, по мне, остальное, может убираться к черту и вариться в собственном соку».(1917г.)
Русь Святая Триединая была, есть и будет!!! Сто лет прошло, а " англичанка продолжает гадить"!!!
Неужели Вы думаете, что подданные британской короны простят Вам столь трагическую гибель уже второй принцессы???
He was a cheat and got what he richly deserved.
Ruined by the overlay of Muzak …. Damn.
Only the heart can lead britania
"Before she was killed" ?
Yes... Dodi and Diana's driver was not authorised and was intoxicated. his actions resulted in her being killed. despite it being an accident.
@@dirkstrachan2421, on top of the drunk driver, paparazzi chasing them, which resulted in reckless drunk driving.
@@jodiuhron1979she died because she wasn’t wearing a seat belt.
@@roseanne74 that’s a factor, too!
@@jodiuhron1979 no. It was THE factor that killed her. The rest was survivable. Trevor Rhys Jones own survival proved that.
We are still disgusted by the royals in 1992
Is this the queen her real voice? Because she sounds a lot as the female actor of Chicago PD! Js 😉
He sounds a nice chsp
King Charles the Weatherman!
lol I know huh !
I'm reading comments and it's surprizing how people forgive a man who drove an innocent woman mad and how she recovered when she separated from him and how she was secretly assassinated. It's appalling how over the years, people are blaming her due to all the publicity done by him and forget the abundant evidences available in history.
She had a very good PR team to make her look like the injured party. She wasn't an innocent.
She had met him 13 times. She was no more in love than he. She wanted to be queen and couldn't take the pace.
What an idiot comment! She was not driven mad and not secretly assassinated. It's difficult to see how she is now being blamed wholly for the break up of the marriage when it has simply been made evident that she was not completely guiltless for the failure of their union.
Reading the comments, I chose to pass viewing this vodeo because of the mistakes said and American English narration.
At last a documentary documents what a gorgon Diana could be, whacking C. over the head with his Bible when he tried to nope out of her endless conflicts. No angel does that.
Poder y Dinero esa es la realidad, cuando el Rey … se van a sacar los ojos … 😮 …
❤❤❤
❤❤❤❤
Diana wasn't perfect .She wasn't the perfect woman or mother they all want to sell .We are all with faults .She had hers .Charles had his and more his sense of failure.She loved her children but made very bad decisions .
Camilla is not Catholic, Andrew was, but Camilla never converted to the Catholic faith
Нет вы рояль ииии крофт
Ииииии только маииии точка
When we see Prince Charles s life recounted in the present video, we still have admiration and appreciation for the person of Prince Charles.
However, it appears that, this video aims to enhance the public figures of both Prince Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles, now King Charles III of the U.K. and Queen Camilla. As stated at the beginning of the video, maintaining a certain mystique of the Reigning Royalty is something important to maintain its prestige , given the long period of reign of many Monarchs .
And , in this sense in the U.K. the history of British Media behavior shows us that they carry out too strong , and exaggerated scrutiny , of the British Royal Family, which makes life very difficult for many of the members of the British Royal Family.
It seems that, perhaps at his advanced age for the first marriage of a future King, the marriage of Prince Charles with Diana Spencer must have taken place too quickly, there not having been enough time for a better mutual understanding of the lovers Charles and Diana, and little preparatory time for Diana's integration into the British Royal Family's way of life.
It is true that Diana came from an Aristocratic Family, predicate that should allow Diana Spencer's masterful performance at public events of the British Monarchy (in fact, Diana attracted crowds) , but she was probably used to an environment of greater freedom. Furthermore, in the video they criticize Diana for being emotionally unbalanced, but an unbalanced person does not play the role of Philanthropy, and of supporting very divisive situations, and of great social stigma, as were the cases of supporting patients with AIDS at the beginning of the 90s, visiting directly with patients of this illness, or to encourage politicians to demine territories in Angola, territories mined during the civil war
Angolan !!!
As for Camilla Parker Bowles, I believe she makes great efforts to play her role as Queen well, and to be a good support for her husband, King Charles III. However, if she were a person with as many qualities as they suggest in this video, she would always have been a factor in uniting , and of supporting, Diana Spencer's two children, namely Prince Harry, as he will never have the privileges of Diana's first son. , Prince William, future King of the U.K.
And, it seems that Camilla was more of a factor in distancing than supporting Prince Harry.
Just remember that, according to reports, Camilla was furious because on the day she was going to give a speech about Domestic Violence, Meghan had a visit to a school. However, in recent times several activities have taken place on the same day by several members of British Royalty.
It seems that members of the top hierarchy of the British Royal Family wanted to get rid of Prince Harry , because they never liked Meghan's way of being, and due to Prince Harry's popularity in
U.K. , and that's why they wanted to get rid of Prince Harry , even allowing the British Media will do everything they can to destroy his professional life, behavior very unworthy of any Family, and especially a Royal Family.
I don't think they tried to oust Harry at all it he who has caused so much heartache especially to his late Grandmother.
No one asked you to write a book, good grief!
Harry is a Traitor who is always pushing his Victim Narrative. He accuses his family of things he and Meghan are guilty of (i.e. leaking to the press, violating a person's privacy, jealousy, racism, bullying, misogyny, elderly abuse, defamation, misinformation, lying under oath (aka perjury), attacking his family through his tellall book Spare, Omid Scobie's books or the Sussex Squad, etc.).He sold his privacy and his family's privacy for money and fame. He thought he was in William's shadow inside the monarchy but now he is always in his narcissist wife's shadow. Meghan was using the race card, misogyny card and the UK press is stalking me (aka I am Diana's reincarnation and history will repeat if Harry doesn't save me) after 4 months in their relationship. She knew Harry's weaknesses were Diana, the press and his insecurity/jealousy about being the spare. What kind of feminist wears a dead mother-in-law's perfume to seduce a man with Oedipal complex? What kind of philanthropist stays SILENT about the African Parks atrocities? What kind of woman marries a man with a record of racism and then accuses her in laws of racism not her husband? What kind of woman accuses the monarchy of being the Empire 2.0 and refuses to give up the titles? What kind of woman shows no compassion/empathy for her father after he had 2 heart attacks and a stroke or her half sister with MS? What kind of philanthropist uses the veterans of the Invictus Games to satisfy her narcissist thirst for attention and exploit them to pay for her expensive fashion show instead of donating all the money to the veterans?
What crap
The monarchy ended on 8/9/22
🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧💜💜💜✨✨✨
Blue dove chippy and acting career
The RF needs to be more human and not robots.
No creo sea malo,, solo inmaduro en sus deciciones con diana
An American narrator? Why?
How much Charles and Camila pay for the document? Very bad one… to obvious !,,👎🏻
Diana was a class act . Charles will always be selfish and a cheater. He lacks moral fiber. Can’t run to mommy now. Pass the crown to William. He IS worthy of respect. Looking forward to King William and Queen Katherine! They will bring back the class and magic!
Your personal opinion dies not matter, Charles was the heir for 73 years, he is now king and that us how it should be
Creo carlos sintio celos de diana y reacciono alejandose de ella y empezaron los problemas
Celos o no, tuvo que alejarse de ella. Diana era una bruja e inmadura también, batiendole así. Pobre de Carlos.
Diana brought the good looking & kindness DNA into the royal line.. Otherwise would just be ugly, cold hearted privileged Pratts…Thankfully she had William & Harry. God bless them both 🙏❤️
ååå
Camilla has become a wonderful wife for King Charles, she sure has made a happier man than he was, Queen Camilla really works hard for the monarchy and deserves the peoples respect
Both cocaine and crack 😅🎉😂❤
I can’t watch a British documentary being narrated by an American...
Golf ball sized crack rock 🪨 🎸 👌 😎 🙌 😳 🪨 🎸 👌 😎 🙌
Yes please 🙏 😍 🙌 ☺️ 😊 😀 🙏 😍 🙌 ☺️ 😊 😀 🙏 😍 🙌 ☺️ 😊 😀 🙏 😍 🙌 ☺️ 😊 😀 🙏 😍 🙌 ☺️ 😊 😀 🙏 😍 🙌 ☺️ 😊 😀 🙏 😍
Blue dove restaurant 💙 franchise golden magic the gathering cards 💙 jester in the movies 🎬 🎞 🎥 🎦 📽 👌 🎬 🎞 🎥 🎦 📽 👌 🎬 🎞 🎥 🎦 📽 👌 🎬 🎞 🎥 🎦
This is such a propaganda film. Trying always to save monarchy. It’s sad
Wow it’s the first time I hear of anything bad Diana did to Charles . She bullied him
Poor Charles. Diana.. for all her wonderful qualities.. was mentally
disturbed since childhood because of her own parents vicious divorce.
She had arrrested emotional development and functioned at the emotional level of a 10 year old. Sadly she passed that emotional disability onto Harry.
Diana was in love with Charles. There were three in the marriage. The royal family used Diana she was young and in love. It is sad that you are blaming this on her. It hurt Diana breaking her heart. She fought to get Charles love. I'm sorry for mental health in Harry came from the royal family. Go back to his uncle who abdicated and even further back.
Diana is a wonderful royal...she done her job and she loved her husband.
@@seren8991 there were at least 6-8 people in the marriage, Barry Mannakee James Hewitt, James Gilbey, Oliver Hoare, Will Carling
@@karinwakefield9153start from the beginning. It was Andrew Parker Bowles, Camilla, their 2 kids, and Charles at the beginning. And Charles and Camilla had no business dragging Diana into their circus
@worldtraveler721 Camilla planned it from the beginning. She is exactly where she planned
Diana is wicked on her own 🤣🤣🤣🤣
King Charles faours feudalism and WEF. NOT pay tax nor inheritance tax. As head of the Church of England it does not fit he is rolled out with globsl arms sales.
Anne did not show impressive talent and enthusiasm for horse RACING - it was for horse JUMPING.
RACING is where the horses are mounted by jockeys, lined up inside a starting gate, gallop around an oval track, and compete to the finish.
SHOW JUMPING is where a horse and equestrian are timed as they canter through an obstacle course, navigate fences, avoid hazards such as water pools and hedges, and receive deductions for failing to have a clean run (missing jumps, downing fence poles, etc.). The fastest to navigate the prescribed course is not necessarily the winner, as the penalties may outweigh the advantages compared to other horses and riders.
Anne’s other equine-related passion is in horse breeding and horse sanctuaries - two things the narrator failed to mention.
Poor scripting conveys misinformation and is indicative of an inexperienced documentarian. 🧐
39:18 hasn't this woman got any self respect?
Disappointed
Faintly interesting. Nothing new. The many American mispronunciations and factual errors and mistakes are irritating. Not really the documentary that the title suggests. A bit of a sensationalist hotch potch. Not recommended.
propaganda
Shameful disgrace, HRH Diana
Poor Elizabeth to have to bear all these ceremonies for her Jubilee while she was slowly and painfully dying out of cancer .This is indignant .
❤❤❤
Poor Elizabeth to have to bear all these ceremonies for her Jubilee while she was slowly and painfully dying out of cancer .This is indignant .
❤❤❤