5400rpm and 7200rpm Hard Drive vs Samsung EVO 850 SSD Solid State Drive
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 сен 2024
- **Update** The Samsung EVO 860 is now available at a GREAT price: amzn.to/2reYiyF
Samsung EVO 850 drive (250gb): amzn.to/1HgZd3v
Samsung EVO 850 drive (500gb): amzn.to/1HgZkfq
We've compared 3 identical Dell Latitude E6430s laptops with 2.7GHz Intel Core i5 Processors, 8GB of memory and 500GB hard drives. All drives included identical information and we were truly shocked to see the difference in system performance. Your hard drive surely shouldn't be overlooked!
HDDs are great for work! You get to your office, turn you pc on, get a coffe, get back, open word and you have one more minute of free break. Just wonderfull.
hell yeah :)
Lol
😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣
Just get ssd for home, keep the shitty hdd for work
But when boss give you a SSD:
The slower ones are actually better. They give you enough time do get some chores done around your house.
ha! agree!!
lmfao
Haha you got that right!!
hooohiiiihiiii
the most creative comment I ever seen xD
I watched the whole video while my office was loading.
:D:
ahhahahahaha
Is it still loading??
Fuck 🤣🤣🤣🤣
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
everything on an ssd in just instantaneous. once you used ssd, you'll really have a hard time going back to an hdd, as it will test your patience
I got an 5400rpm 2tb hard drive and paired it up with Intel optane , I cant even tell the difference between an ssd and my set up
@@Davidorino Is Windows installed on the SSD?
@@Davidorino you mean 5400* ?
Ty I corrected it
@@Davidorino 😂😂😂😂😂
Best comparison I've seen.
Very good comparison. It shows that if your budget is a ted limited, a good 7200 rpm mechanic hard drive still gives a lot of a difference in terms of performance when compared to a standard 5400 rpm laptop mechanic disk and the 7200 rpm also costs a lot less than a SSD with equal capacity. For me, the 7200 appears to be the best choice in terms of value vs delivered performance! Thank you for the tests!
Edvar Júnior thank you sir! I think the 7200rpm drive is a great choice when on a budget. I’d also keep my eye out for deals on SSD’s from time to time. I believe I saw a 240gb SSD for something like $60 just the other day.
Hi... Yeah... The difference is significant when on tight budgets, but in my personal case it is really huge because I live on Brazil, despite I haven't mention before, where the fees and other taxes our gonvernment imposes are really abusive, normally around 50% the price of the product (yet not considering importing fees!). Products priced a bit lower receive proportionally lower fees. Thus, here in our country the difference (in terms of price) between a SSD and a regular hard drive becomes even greater than that originally practicized in countries of North America or Europe... 60$ for us is a really nice price, but when these itens come to Brazil we multiply this value for 5 or even 10x (sometimes)... But this is it. We can't wait nothing more for a "proteccionist governement" which do not open the doors for the free commerce around the world... Have a nice day my dear!
5400 rpm drive here. Debian LXDE.Libre Office. 4 seconds. I bet with an SSD it would open before I came into the room ! LOL
+Douglas Alan libre office is always fast load for me in any linux distro i've used on my slow ass laptop (Turion x2 cpu and 5400rpm drive)
Holy shit same distro. but 7200rpm with DebLXDE, changed with a lightweight greeter and a lightweight windows manager. Killed all unnecessary systemctl services and it’s fucking fast as hell 🤣
Great real world tests. Nice job!
Awesome video, thank you. Looks like I'm going with the evo. Also, how did you get 3 arms? Were you born with them?
It's a skill some of us were born with :)
cooool
"have been cloned to contain the exact same information. No other changes [...] have been made".
please explain the difference in superbar then.
left: Explorer and Chrome
mid: IE, Explorer and WMP
right: Explorer and Chrome
Nixy Novahkiin so you know why there is this difference? share your knowledge!
Nixy Novahkiin yes, keep calling me retarded. Or you just look up the definition of cloning. Then you'll learn, that if you clone something to "contain exactly the same information", there is no possibility for such a difference.
The only way this can happen is customization. This also means, the images are NOT equally the same.
I wasn't pointing the comment towards you but I might as well be now after I read this. :^)
Nixy Novahkiin wow. You really seem to be genious. Obviously, 'MCIglo' and 'MC Iglo' is the same person - me.
Nixy Novahkiin Prolly. Or this might be just because Google merged old Google and RUclips accounts. Nobody knows...
Ordered an Evolving 850 1Tb earlier today, looking forward to receiving it!
One thing that pisses me off about gaming laptops is that most have a 1TB 5400rpm hard drive. Its' a bottleneck that is a dealbreaker for me in many cases.
Yes sadly I recently purchased a high specd machine i7-8550U,8gb ram,4gb 940MX(gets the job done) and a crappy 2 TB hdd (5400 rpm) I will definitely look into buying an ssd
"High spec machine" "940mx" rip as for the ssd look at the cruxial mx500 the price usually drops down to 100 for 1tb
I unfortunately purchased one such Dell 5567 when I didn't know about this stuff at much and just looked at specs like i7, 16 GB RAM and 1 TB HDD, it must be good ... That 16gb ram is at 2400 MHz and HDD is 5400 RPM. I hated opening up a new application in my laptop but after it opens up, it's snappy. I only wish I knew this stuff 4 years ago 😣
@@earthling_parth get an ssd. They're not expensive and so much faster.
@@UnrealOG137 copy that 😁
One whole damn minute just to open a office program? WTF both of your HDD's are defective.
+ramanmono aha, HDD Samsung 500gb 2.5'' 5400 + Win7 64 - 15 sec.
7200RPM 1TB (almost full) boots Windows 8 in 15 seconds. I know Vista / 7 is much slower than the "current" Gen OS's, but not that much slower. I mean shit, my laptop with half the specs of my desktop could still boot Windows 7 in 30-ish seconds.
+ramanmono Probably has never been defragged.
+Dude13450 Windows 8 boots so fast because when it shuts down, it does a Hibernation/Shutdown hybrid, so that it boots quicker, if you want to see the real boot times, hold shift while you press shut down in Windows, then turn it on again.
+Choppy Sean this video is also fake
There is something wrong with the 2 laptops running HDD. It takes too much, it's not right.
It's the same for me.
Hdd are slower
Yep, the same for me
Boot up is probably correct. I think the part that doesn't make sense is opening OpenOffice. If I had to take a guess I'd say that the two HDD computers weren't done loading programs in the background at startup which is why it took some more time.
As Darth Vader would say "Impressive, most impressive".
excellent comparation! thanks!
This video is so quiet I had to check if it froze lol I like it but try audio in the back so we can get a feel for the time in that sense! Good work
This was made in early 2015 & I am Soooo Glad I learned about SSD drives before starting to record a new album in 2018. The HDD's are good for storage in 2019 because SSD is super affordable now for everyone if you look in the right places.
KC Darin glad you enjoyed it, I can’t imagine going back to a HDD now!
there is something VERY wrong about this video. my 2007 laptop with pentium dual core 1.6ghz 2gb ram, 5400 rpm can boot up faster than both these core i5 computers using HDD. this video has to somehow be rigged.
+AssHoleThunder they watched too much porn lol
+AssHoleThunder You're probably putting your computer into sleep. Almost everyone who says their computer boots super fast are using sleep mode.
+RipleySawzen i am 100% sure that my computer is OFF
AssHoleThunder
I guess you never really said HOW fast yours boots. These do seem absurdly slow, but I deal with a boot time of only around 15 seconds so anything over 30 seconds seems rather slow to me. I remember my old XP machine would take minutes. I'd hit the power button and go do stuff in the mean time.
+RipleySawzen I've got an hp g7 with an i3 2350m. It loads up windows in a decent amount of time but once logged in it freezes for a bit and I have to wait a good 30 seconds. I load up Ubuntu and it does it fast and then I login and I can get started right away. I know Ubuntu loads faster than Windows but the difference is substantial. Got an old laptop you don't have money to upgrade parts on and all you need to do is use office programs and check email? Get linux.
The SSD drive, that's impressive!
The SSD is one sure-fire way to get a large performance boost from any computer. I put a Samsung 850 EVO in my old HP DV7 laptop (SATA II) several months ago and just yesterday put the same in my SATA III desktop PC; BIG difference. Well worth the dinero IMO.
apple 2019 iMac has 5400 RPM HDD and it cost 1,500$ . i came here to see how bad can it be . and its F***ing DISGUSTING .
Green Sky dang that stinks!
Green Sky actually it’s not that bad TBH I use a 5400RPM hard drive, to edit, play games and load a ton of programs. It’s really not that noticeable
great work, good demo.
That is a substantial difference.
great video exactly what I needed to know
Big speed difference!
Thank you. It's exactly what I was looking for.
The methodology is flawed; the laptops do not have identical desktops or taskbars suggesting that some might be loading more services or startup applications. And we need more information regarding the SATA controller configuration. Is it set to Legacy (IDE Mode) or AHCI? Also have the laptop's hard drives been defragmented fully prior to the test?
I highly doubt the HDD performances are true, specially the 7200 RPM one. Way too slow. Slowed down on purpose.
Fresh install (or clone), meaning no Windows Prefetching. You shouldn't comment on tech videos if you don't know a thing about the subject.
Bill Goldberg I know a lot, you dont know anything about me you fool
Bill Goldberg
Ah that's a thought. I sort of understand. Does this take up more ram. I turned superfectch off on my win 10 laptop. Next up is an SSD to save mucking around....
@@nixxxon18 dumbass lol
Way cool! Thank you for the video!!!
Welll duhhhhhh
The middle one has both the vents blocked and the far left one is obviously getting all the sunlight which produces heat and we all know heat slows electronics down. Ofcourse the ssd wil lwin!
Candi Soda ssd would win anyways
Ramon, you don't get sarcasm
Zviadi Zviadauri mhhmm
My record was 14 secs from cold boot from power up to desktop on a gen3 i3 lenovo SFF + 840 Evo.
My later DDR4 systems were much slower to boot (~30 secs) even on much faster hardware all around.
My Acer Aspire 5 (A515-51) boots up in about six to eight seconds exactly. NVMe M.2 SSDs are awesome.
thanks guys, I'm having that exact SSD drive TODAY !!
i cant imagine working with hdd in windows 7+ its insanity :)
did i ever tell you the definition of insanity ?
I bet this is even with the SSD being bottlenecked with sata 2
cool rl life comparison GJ
I upgraded it too. Because my 5400rpm Seagate hard drive is really killing me.
watched the video and in less than a minute I already have results. you have my like and sub m8 lol
Great vid thank you
Left: 4200 rpm HDD
Middle: 7200 rpm HDD
Right: Samsung SSD
I have a 5400rpm drive. I went to Costco and looked at the new laptops with ssds and cried
Just buy the ssd drive, put Windows on it and profit.
@@mchlbk I just did. My laptop now takes less than 15 seconds to boot up and any program I open takes 2 seconds or less, sometimes instant.
running windows 7 off 5400 rpm hard disk was not so bad, try that with win 10, you cannot really use w10 without SSD
i like how he just sits there long after the PC boots up and counts for the time where he just waited for no reason. give the 5400rpm drive some justice man.
He was waiting for the icons to load at the bottom
forma mais pratica pra explicar a velocidade de leitura de um SSD great!!!!
Great video ! Thanks !
On my 7200 drive win 7 boots in 15 seconds...office in 2 seconds..guess you hard drives are defective
I depends on how much data you have on a drive. My 7200rpm drive when i first got it was very fast. Boot to desktop with in 30 seconds. Now that i have it full, it takes around 1-2 minutes to fully boot to desktop.
Darkhalo314
no...your startup is just full with bloatware..go to start menu,tupe msconfig ..and go tostartup...and turn off everythig that starts when windows starts..you will see giant diference..
It's not bloatware. My computer is for gaming, and i only have programs like steam, origin, and uplay installed. I have no other programs installed (other than those mentioned and including their games downloaded) and I always do maintenance on my PC that way it lasts and performs like i want.
Windows 11 should have made SSD boot drives mandatory, honestly. It made TPM chips and secure boot mandatory.
Watching this is reminding me of why I won't give in to the cheaper 7200rpm for my first PC build. I don't care about the cheaper extra space, I'd rather have the more expensive faster performance!
Why not both
@@loadingsolate it would make even less sense 3+ more years later, just get an SSD. I got a 1tb m.2 nvme in December for like 80 bucks lol
I meant, a low-capacity ssd for boot drive with a HHD would also do the job. Being a boot drive will slow down the HDD so...
@@loadingsolate I mean yeah it would get the job done, however I just saw no real benefit in having a hard drive now days except if you need a higher capacity storage drive or something
I have limited budget and my SSD sometime overheats(m.2). While I have 3 ssds, their capacity is too small for me. So I attached a external HDD(Yes Im using a laptop) and it works great at half the price of an modern same capacity SSD.
I restored an old 2011 ASUS Core i3 laptop. Put a $35 Kingston SSD in it, after a fresh manual Windows 7 install (OS only, no vendor software) it boots in 15-20 seconds! Awesome laptop to experiment with/web browse/play old games etc. SSDs are awesome. Windows 10 really needs to be on an SSD. If you must use a HDD, it has to be 7200RPM or more. 5400 RPM drives are so slow with Windows 10 the PC is barely usable
I replaced the stock 7200rpm hard drive on a 2012 desktop PC with an SSD, even though the motherboard only had SATA II (3 gb/s). Even with a lot of the I/O speed being bottlenecked at 3 gb/s, I got a huge performance boost. Startup and shutdown time are much faster, and opening Visual Studio 2015 went from about a minute to about 15-20 seconds.
So even if you have a slightly older PC with SATA II, depending on how you weigh the price against the performance enhancement, it may still be worth it to you.
I actually read about this the other day somewhere....a detailed benchmark using a SSD on sata II vs sata III.....the difference was negligible...most people would not notice the difference using there hard drive between sata II and III. However, M.2 is very noticeable.
That's very interesting. Theoretically, there should have been a 2x increase in read/write speed. I wonder if there was some other bottleneck taking place that throttled the SATA III speed.
yes the theoretical numbers always look good on paper, that's why over the years I have become wary of claims in the computer world about massive performance increases. Sometimes the claims sound great but when you buy something the performance is sometimes underwhelming from all the hype.
I found the link for the benchmark. It is on Tom's Hardware website. This shows both the theoretical and real world tests....you will see from the real world that you would barely notice a difference between sata II and III. Link is here www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-upgrade-sata-3gbps,3469-15.html
+Andrew Whitburn That's an interesting article, I've never heard that before. I've always seen that modern SSD often do ~550MB/s, which surpasses the 300MB/s SATA II bottleneck. Makes sense though that real-world performance differs from synthetic benchmarks. I personally switched from a HDD to an 850 Evo SSD on my SATA II motherboard, which gave a massive performance boost as you'd expect. It's now in my new system using SATA III, which is certainly faster, but I moved from Phenom/DDR3 to Skylake/DDR4 so I'm not sure if the SATA interface change was responsible for any significant gains compared to the other components. I'm just talking about perceived quickness and boot times; I haven't benchmarked transfer rates or anything.
this video has a lot of problems, as with everyone that has commented the 7200rpm drive has clearly a differnt set up. after this the other massive problem noticed is the 2 different people that are clicking the buttons. this could have been over come by recording 3 times and lining up the time lines or setting the systems to network boot.
Wait this is what you are worried about? This entire video is clearly fake, NO hard drives work that slow
haha well this is true
EVO's RAPID mode was enabled in this test?
Ssd is crazy significant
"we were truly shocked to see the difference in system performance". Umm I don't want to be mean but.. is your HDD 7200RPM and 5400RPM defected or broken? Because mine is just 5400RPM Core i5 RAM 2 Gb but It's Much faster than yours. (I am Using Windows 10 and feeling that It's slower. but yours aren't. If they were that slow. I will shut that PC off and go do something.) I think that it's unfair that compared those defected HDDs to New unboxing and installed SSD. Good Video to see how fast these SSDs in today are. but to compare the broken or modded HDDs or something is not good. Liked and Subbed
I tested the new Evo 850 1tb against my older Seagate 750gb Hybrid after cloning it. CrystalMark showed read/write numbers 3 times higher on the Evo! They were tested in the same laptop.
You may want to make your OS is optimized for the SSD.
Optimized how?
I'm upgrading to an ssd after 3 months of using a 5400rpm disk that's been used from 2009
That’s gonna be a big change
It shouldn't take a minute for it to open on a hard drive, you should of demonstrated how fragmented both hard drives were, or ran Defraggler on both HDDs fully before doing this test.
This test shows a start-up, not a wake-up.
5400 rpm gives lower boot time but takes more load than 7200 rpm drive that's why if you have 7200 rpm drive give you a good boot time but slow loading
Granted those laptops are newer than my dell latitude e5520 with an i5 2.3ghz processor and 6gb memory, so while our units run with a sata3 connection, my laptop with a toshiba q-series 128gb ssd, boots into windows within 10seconds or so, it appears quicker than yours it seems.
Whoa smashing. I just bought Samsung 850 evo
What is the data transfer rate of the hard drives?
The 5400 as expected was the slowest of the three. A full minute in and still not at the the desktop. I never realized how painfully slow they are until they are compared with a solid state drive. The only reasons that such slow 5400 RPM drives exist is they run a little bit cooler and they are less expensive.
You never realized it because this times are completely faked. No hard drives are that slow.
Kirk Slaydon May have been loaded with malware and junk to slow it down.
Honestly hdds today are a bit faster but made shittier. I have an old laptop from 2004 including a 5400rpm hdd ide made in 2001. Still works to this day. The new hdds may be a bit faster but they still would not last compared to the old ones.
5400 rpm: wait one minutes
when you open up the program your using, for example in my case photoshop, is there a difference with performance, ie: the 5400rpm runs slower using photoshop than the SSD drive...thanks
no, only the initial loading will change. then after that it depends how fast ur ram is.
So example i play a game, on a 5400rpm it takes 30 seconds to fully load a level. But in game i get 60 frames per second.
on a 7200rpm it takes 20 seconds to fully load a level. But in game i get 60 frames per second.
on a SSD it takes 5 seconds to fully load a level. But in game i get 60 frames per second.
SO the only thing that changes is the first loading time.
Which 7200rpm HDD you used in one of those laptops?
THANKS FOR YOU VIDEO
My Sony Vaio laptop with 5400 rpm HDD, Intel Core i3 2nd Gen, 4 GB DDR3 RAM boots up Windows 7 Professional in 35-40 seconds with several programs installed. These were really slow even with 7200 rpm HDD.
next time you plan to group buy laptops would you mind telling me?
How old are those hard drives? I’ve never seen a 7200 rpm hard drive open a program that slowly.
At this point the video is over 3 years old, they were probably a year or two old at the time.
37 seconds of dead air. Better without that I'd say. Plus from what I was looking at, the 5400 rpm finished in about 1 min and 8 secs not 1 min and 50 secs
+Coral Laroc yea me too
This video is faked anyways
You sound so Excited to make this video MonoTone..
ty for this!
Wow the HDD is so slow compared to SSD
I'd believe this, I have a WD Blue 5400 HDD with 750gb and its slower than both of the HDDs in this video, after seeing that SDD perform, I think I know what I'm buying for my Inspiron 15R
This video is faked
Already bought an 850 man, its stunning how quick it is and for the price it can't be beat! I'd recommend one in a heartbeat!
+John Izraelski oh for sure its a great drive and much better than any 7200 rpm drive. i was just saying they severly faked the times on the 5400 and 7200 rpm drives.
+Kirk Slaydon well if they did, it's whatever but I'm just saying that my 5400 rpm WD Blue was as slow as a snail and the 850 Evo was a stunning upgrade
samsung evo is extremely fast I would like to see a test using one of the linux operating systems.
This is a good vs but try it on three desk tops that run the same stuff but use the latest ssd sense they have the new ones out now.
dont know what is wrong with your open office. I have 5400 rpm drive and it opens up open office in less than 8 seconds. your took up over a minute. wtf? :)
Perhaps you selected 'Load on startup'?
the middle one has no video graphic driver, see that menu transparency is off
this test is not valid
I dont understand the speed. If the SSD has a write speed of up to 400-500mb and HDD around 200, how come the laptopt with SSD booted up in 15 secs, and the other in 60 seconds? That's like 4 times faster which doesnt really correlate to the speed?
The numbers 400mb/s and 200mb/s are of sequential read/write. While the boot procedure of an OS like windows here, read a huge amount of very small files all over the disk. To read those small files it takes the old spinning HDDs forever but SSDs could bring those files way much faster due to the difference in mechanic how they access small files or say, places randomly all over the disk. that's why SSDs are performing so much better than HDDs. And this applies to other programs. Normally the big numbers for sequential read/write only come to real effect when you are dealing with huge files like editing video clips or so.
This is why you get a ssd and a hard drive
OpenOffice (4.1.3) on my Windows Vista install, on a 7200 rpm HD loads faster than on the SSD laptop.
I think something must be wrong with my Vista install :)
And Linux on a HD shuts down faster than Windows 7 on a SSD. (Eat this, Microsoft)
ill use hibernation till ssd prices go down ..
Welp time to wake up
The HDD took so much time to open openoffice that I thought I had accidentally paused the video.
Same on my laptop. Annoying.
the EVO 850 in my desktop boot windows 10 in 8- 10sec max. how come the difference is so big?
good compare...
a good fake one
Aww yeah! my Debian 9 starts in 4 seconds
Honestly I think you should get an ssd for the OS and a big hard drive for your stuff
A slow HDD is fine if you keep everything clean and neat, open things up in advance E.T.C but if you want to work hard buy a SSD. Obviously you should still be careful with viruses
yo some numbers over the laptops?
Hi, Can I do a Disk Image of my hard drive on Windows 8.1 and the restore that image drive on a new SSD Hard drive?
dana miller
SSD: Bro, hurry up
Bro, slow down.
Damn open office blows. Why didn't you use LibreOffice.
Could you come up with a more irrelevant comment? Not to mention it's a faked video anyways
look at his laptops their from the 90s
running in the 90s
@1:39 - hello ,anybody there ... ....................
Holy shit. Point taken.
well i open office in 2.5 sec 7200 rpm. something is wrong with your hdds
Poseidon Republic the speed of how apps open has to do with more than just hard drive speed or the type of drive. It also has to do with the amount of RAM you have and if you’ve already opened the app recently(then that particular app will open faster). However, the initial opening of an app from first time to infinity will forever be faster with an ssd(regardless of how much RAM you have) and whether the app had already been opened recently or not.
Dude from Everest College™ that doesn’t explain why it took 30 seconds on an HDD
Dude from Everest College™ I have 1,800 GB ram and office opens in a millisecond
Can you add closed captions?
How do you get it to boot so fast with an SSD? I just recently upgraded my hard drive to an 850 EVO and clean installed windows 7 on it. My total start-up time is ~30 seconds from when I press the power button to when the desktop shows. Yours is closer to ~20 seconds. Is there any way to improve that?
Alvin Anthel Perhaps just try the basics. Disable unnecessary start up programs.
Alvin Anthel your ram and cpu affect in bootup times...
+Alvin Anthel wat de... somehow my ssd win7 boot time only 9sec.. im using 850evo also..
i dont get wht ppl getting more than 17sec boot time win7 using same SSD
wd elements 5400 rpm 32 or 64 mb cache I am using a hdd with 100 mb read speed and although there is no fps problem in most games, stuttering happens. I am considering buying a toshiba mg08 hard disk 7200 rpm 512 mb cache 262 mb read speed, do you think toshiba mg08 hard disk has a stuttering problem in games is it possible