Great work! I’ve spent the year building and painting terrain, tokens and titans. Now I’m starting on a marine army! Happy New Year. My wish for GW further support would be for another marine infantry box too (breachers , destroyers, heavy bolter and las cannon armed infantry) and some of the missing marine vehicles (whirlwinds, vindicators, typhon and cerberus spartan variants and the marine super heavy tanks). Anyway, if not, there’s always 3D printing!
I really want a new armour mark, but agree we do also need more types of infantry. If we get another infantry sprue, my guess is it'll be both combined i.e. mark 3 destroyers, etc. But I'd really like the full range in marks 6 and mark 3. And mark 4, but that's not likely given they haven't redone them for 28mm.
@@angelicdespot2735 the other problem is, the only way to do it where it doesn’t look out of place is if it’s an alternative to the existing detachments. If all missiles were one mark, and lascannons another, and heavy bolters a third, what’s going on? Are we arming people based on armor marks?
@@EagleSpireGaming yes, it's a problem. That's why I say I'd like two different things. 1) the expansion of the mk6 range so that a whole army can be built with all infantry options in the same armour mark and 2) an entirely new range of infantry in mark 3 (following what they've already done in 28mm), repeating all of the unit options. I don't think GW will consider that level of redundancy to be worth it though*, so suspect they'll compromise by doing mark 3 armour with the missing infantry. *The only possible hope is that they've already done some pretty niche units... It seems like the player base for LI isn't huge and most players are playing marines... the number of people wanting to buy many Solar Auxilia specialist Leman Russ or Malcador variants can't be that many... Probably more people would buy tactical marines in mark 3 armour, even with no new rules, than would buy some of the existing kits. Fingers crossed!
I’m posting this here now, because I think i completely forgot to mention it, but Custodes and Daemons…. They’re next, and hopefully we will see them sometime this upcoming year.
@@ah526 two battlegroups and the starter worth, as well as a thunderhawk, and a slew of rhinos. Haven’t started on them, mostly because I like to work one thing at a time, but also I think I’m kind of waiting to see what else comes out, as maybe that will change my legion.
@ that was actually what pushed me to do the titans. I’ve honestly had plans for Marines for a while now, introducing them into the campaign on opposite sides, just a minimum detachment.
Both. My own gray shame is growing and you have inspired me to not buy anymore until I am finished painting all that I own (legion imperialis, only) The chant also needs work. Keep up the content and enjoy the new year
Sounds like an amazing year ahead.
Can't imagine anything stopping you completing everything on that list!
Happy New Year
@@Vladddd309 my own procrastination is a strong contender, but I have hope!
Happy new year Lord commander
Happy New year! Great video, fantstic progeress mate. Thank you.
Great work! I’ve spent the year building and painting terrain, tokens and titans. Now I’m starting on a marine army! Happy New Year.
My wish for GW further support would be for another marine infantry box too (breachers , destroyers, heavy bolter and las cannon armed infantry) and some of the missing marine vehicles (whirlwinds, vindicators, typhon and cerberus spartan variants and the marine super heavy tanks). Anyway, if not, there’s always 3D printing!
@@davidwasilewski I forgot about breachers!
There’s so many vehicles to add. I’m sure they will keep going, it’s all just a mater of time.
First warhound looks amaizing
@@ah526 I need to come up with a name for it, forgot to do that. Same for the others
I really want a new armour mark, but agree we do also need more types of infantry. If we get another infantry sprue, my guess is it'll be both combined i.e. mark 3 destroyers, etc.
But I'd really like the full range in marks 6 and mark 3. And mark 4, but that's not likely given they haven't redone them for 28mm.
@@angelicdespot2735 the other problem is, the only way to do it where it doesn’t look out of place is if it’s an alternative to the existing detachments. If all missiles were one mark, and lascannons another, and heavy bolters a third, what’s going on? Are we arming people based on armor marks?
@@EagleSpireGaming yes, it's a problem. That's why I say I'd like two different things. 1) the expansion of the mk6 range so that a whole army can be built with all infantry options in the same armour mark and 2) an entirely new range of infantry in mark 3 (following what they've already done in 28mm), repeating all of the unit options.
I don't think GW will consider that level of redundancy to be worth it though*, so suspect they'll compromise by doing mark 3 armour with the missing infantry.
*The only possible hope is that they've already done some pretty niche units... It seems like the player base for LI isn't huge and most players are playing marines... the number of people wanting to buy many Solar Auxilia specialist Leman Russ or Malcador variants can't be that many... Probably more people would buy tactical marines in mark 3 armour, even with no new rules, than would buy some of the existing kits. Fingers crossed!
@ could also see something with legion specific units.
I think the best option would be to sprinkle them in with random detachments.
I’m posting this here now, because I think i completely forgot to mention it, but Custodes and Daemons…. They’re next, and hopefully we will see them sometime this upcoming year.
Happy new Year
2025 slay the grey :-)
Happy new year
Must say i find planing "funny" because when i plan nothing goes my way, by "yoloing" i finish faster than expected
@@ah526 it’s interesting because I think I end up the opposite. This plan is also a way for me to hold myself accountable.
Where does it say that knights and titans are their own faction now. I completely missed that.
@@Bluppsn rise of the dark mechanicum. You can still ally in individual titans, or you can take actual formations of them in their own faction.
Didnt you also have spacemaeines or are they not done
@@ah526 two battlegroups and the starter worth, as well as a thunderhawk, and a slew of rhinos. Haven’t started on them, mostly because I like to work one thing at a time, but also I think I’m kind of waiting to see what else comes out, as maybe that will change my legion.
@@EagleSpireGaming i did 1 box of spacemarine than1 box of solar to "keep thing interesring"
@ that was actually what pushed me to do the titans. I’ve honestly had plans for Marines for a while now, introducing them into the campaign on opposite sides, just a minimum detachment.
Comment for the comment throne!
Interaction for the Algorithm!!!
Eh, it’s a work in progress
@@davidchambers331 what’s a work in progress? The algorithm or the army? One is definitely doing better than the other lol
Both. My own gray shame is growing and you have inspired me to not buy anymore until I am finished painting all that I own (legion imperialis, only)
The chant also needs work. Keep up the content and enjoy the new year
@@davidchambers331 James workshop won’t like to hear that lol. I like the chant, hopefully I can keep inspiring more people in the new year!