Andrew Tate BBC Interview Derails Into Combative Debate (FULL INTERVIEW VERSION)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 июн 2023
- Destiny reacts to Andrew Tate's latest interview with the BBC during his house arrest...
Date: 1 June, 2023
▼Follow Destiny▼
►STREAM - www.destiny.gg/bigscreen
►TWITTER - / theomniliberal
►DISCORD - discordapp.com/invite/destiny
►REDDIT - / destiny
►INSTAGRAM - / destiny
►MERCH - shop.destiny.gg/
Check Out My Amazon: www.amazon.com/shop/destiny
Buy My Merch: shop.destiny.gg/
#destiny
#politics
#debate
The fact that the BBC deleted the interview from their site after 70k dislikes speaks volume.
exactly! Only comment under this video that matters.
Tate 1 - BBC 0
@@persuasivebarrier2419that smug look on your face 😂🎉❤
It speaks volumes how much influence he has and how he’s strengthen peoples distrust in mainstream media. I think there’s no way Romania doesn’t jail him at this point they have too much pressure to not look like dumb its the last month they have to charge him they would make up charges before letting him free at this point.
It might speak to the fact that he has an internet army of lunatics which proves her point about his bad influence.
The machete comment was a huge blunder from the interviewer. Kinda paints her as a liar or someone who didn't bother researching
She doesn't have an option of researching as the company she works for does not allow researching. She is given a script that she has to read from. No other option.
@@paolorossi5989exactly
Not even Destiny picked up on that
She is an interviewer... she is not bringing her beliefs into it; whether she asks about things he does believe or he did say, but are out of context or he did not say, he should answer to disprove or clear up or deny or not comment, he should not argue about the questions themselves.
she proved that before the machete comment imo. tate comes across as frantic at times, but at the end of the day he answered her questions and defended himself decently for the most part. will be interesting to see how the rest of this plays out. either way one side is going to take a pretty cringe victory lap.
Notice how Destiny has something to say when Tate says something which is arguably incorrect, but when the reporter spews out of context garbage and he debunks that, he says nothing.
Facts bro I noticed that too
Destiny literally said that is what tate should do and why the interviewer did that
@@TheKultteri no, he stayed silent. stay seated destiny fangirl.
@@fazeext9777 nah I’m not a fangirl. Tate just can’t handle himself in interviews like one should. Though same can be said for anyone who is under fire and being interviewed
Destiny's bias is extreme.
Destiny trying hard to seem neutral but we all know he is biased as hell against Tate
His whole lifestyle is tryin to convince people they don't gotta be like Tate. He just can't let it go now
Ohh no Destiny is soo biased against Tate and Epstein, why doesn't he talk more neutrally about Sex traffickers 😭😭
@@DerEchteBabo du redest mit Gespenstern in deinem Kopf. Keiner hat hier jeh Epstein angesprochen und Tate ist halt einfach kein Sex trafficker, es wird gegen ihn ermittelt aber er wurde noch nicht mal angeklagt geschweige denn schuldig gesprochen. Solltest vielleicht mal versuchen selbstständig zu denken.
@@DerEchteBabo who brought up Epstein? “This would make sense I guess if your some -Destiny- dick sucker.”
@@DerEchteBabo innocent until proven guilty buddy, he didn’t sex traffic anyone, until proven that he has
Its pretty obvious that he did the interview and recorded it himself to destroy the credibility of the bbc. Hes anticipating them to clip his videos.
32:34 she's saying that schools are reporting higher incidents of female teachers/students being attacked and attributing it to "Tate and his teachings"?
I'm not a fan of Tate but that is so ridiculous
If the perpetrators are claiming it’s because of Tate, why can’t he victims do that also?
Thats the only reason i cant take her serious
She did list the schools that are reporting about tates influence, I think she meant was the overall effects of tates message how its impact young kids to treat women.
@@darksoul5248 when did she list the schools?
@darksoul5248 I'm saying that the claim is ridiculous. By the "schools" for making it and her for relaying it
Sooo... He went to look up whether Tate really donated 25 million dollars a year... And just gave up halfway
At some point absence of evidence becomes evidence of absence
@@bubbaliburtee8657 this is not evidence of absence. He was to lazy to click a few buttons or research even slightly before articulating a conclusion
@@ShreyGupta874 Link to a shred of evidence he donated a cent
@@bubbaliburtee8657 get off your lazy ass and find the evidence to disprove it. the burden is on your my friend.
@@bubbaliburtee8657Lmao, the guy never responded after 2 hours.
The thing that annoys me most is how i feel like the majority of the world doesnt seem to be able to rationalise topics like the 'walking home' argument for themselves.
Destiny just needs to talk to Tate directly lol.
Bro its gonna get bitched
Why? Lol
Why not? So we have a video to full sleep to..
Why so sirious
That would be very interesting podcast. But my money is on Tate even Destiny is pretty good debater
@@Ghyll Tate found a way to even get destroyed by Hasan. He sucks at debates, the problem is that his fanboys dont have brains developed enough to see it yet.
Destiny believes Andrew Tate is guilty, so all of his answers and responses are tainted by that overt bias. He seems to immediately and reflexively revert to a defensive position when called out for this… which is amusing to me. Just be honest about it, brother.
Guilty of WHAT?
These people are pure clowns. The law doesn't depend on EMOTION, it depends on FACTS. There isn't a single fact that exists in this narrative laden expose from leftist la la land.
He will also usually hedge his bets by claiming he will change his mind once new evidence occurs. I get the feeling there will be some major cope if tate isn’t even charged or is and is found innocent.
Some charges were dropped today, soy boy smurf is definitely melting today.
Here to say that situation is critical for Tate
It’s hilarious Destiny thinks he would remain cool in a crazy interview after being put in prison for months. Dude would break down and no way would he protect anyone when it comes down to any real situation
Is a "real situation" a situation where there's potential violence? Curious idea of what's real and what isn't...
Destiny remains cool in nearly no conversation he has, he has the emotional maturity of a 10yo and he's pretty entertaining when he talks about these things.
@@Smithy2222 It's funny how in this male debate-space everyone keeps calling everyone else a child. There seems to be some real anxiety floating around.
His blue hair will save him no worries
@@flat_foot9017 but tate being gay didn't save him 😢😢
The interviewer was horrible. She takes so many things Andrew said super personally.
You can literally see this bias and anger radiating from her.
@@afroxfairyxxx8382 The interviewer was also interrupting him and getting mad when he did it back to her. I know BBC is biased but that interviewer was incredibly unprofessional.
@@Insanityltself Feminists when discussing a topic related to their ideology can never have intellectually honest conversation. They cannot have objective, unemotional, logic based discussion. Feminism by nature DEMANDS the abandoning of intellectualism in discussion. It's why the moment a single disagreement comes up, the feminist devolves into near primitive anger. Always, forever, you won't find three examples showing different.
Super personally? She remained calm and professional the entire time and asked questions about the things he said on camera. She repeated herself when he didn't give a clear answer.
She was a tough interviewer, but these are the kind of interviews/ers you want: they can actually hold powerful people such as politicians accountable.
@@chocolatMouse you're either not british or just 12 years old if you cannot detect the anger oozing out of ever fibre of her being. if ANY woman spoke to me the way she did in real life i would 100% stop and ask why the hell i'm being talked to with obvious malice.
@fazeext9777 I think the twelve year olds are the ones who have never seen real proper interviews, such as Chris Wallace interviewing Trump. I also don't know what being British has to do with this.
This is what a good journalist does: they ask tough questions and don't let up until they're answered. It's not a friendly conversation. Fans of the other side of the table may not like that, but a good interviewer is not going to let you get away if you don't want to answer a particular question.
This is like asking the cops for another interrogation after they've already put you in jail.
Tate does this to galvanize supporters and build hatred for the media as an arm of the matrix. Whether he gets the charges dropped is only a minor detail for him, it's about making sure that if he goes down so do they.
And then as getting up saying "that was fun. See you again Thursday?"
its cuz hes obviously innocent bro lol, no sane guilty man would even think of doing this
How?
It's really not. If there was evidence he would never have been released, that's facts. Very likely there is nothing to charge him with. This interview was a HUGE w for Tate. And I'm no Tate fan, but I'm definitely a BBC hater
Why did the Reporter *NOT* simply have a _Tablet w/ Tate's Video Recorded Quotes ready to play, before asking the correlating questions?_
It would have been to easy for him to show context then and if (I have not seen his videos) she was spinning or adding things, it would have been hugely embarrassing and uncomfortable. She was simply working to the official script of he is a bad person and women hate him because yes, some do feel that way. Others do not, hence why it became a rather silly session.
@@eddieingalls534 Yeah,...I was thinking about how journalists used to perform due diligence, conduct research & only use examples from known contexts. As Harper Lee stated, _"never, never, never... ask a question you don't already know the answer to..."_
@@joewat3982 She would have to play hours of video clips then.
@@SM-rf4vr -hours- _???_
She would only need to play the excerpts that correlate with the verbatim quotes that she was citing.
@@joewat3982 then he can say taken out of context. How decides if they are his views or just jokes?
Destiny also almost never said anything negative or bad about Lucy during the entire watch time. If he was so fair, he would have AT LEAST mentioned ONE flaw in her line of questioning, but he didn't. He didn't mention the way Lucy gave pointed statements and then rephrased them as questions, doesn't indicate her flaws when presented with facts that demonstrate her lack of preparation, doesn't hint at the fact that she seems to have an established bias against Tate and how that creates a shift in the way she interviewed him, nothing.
extremely good point.
Shes not done much thats not expected and were more interested in seeing what we can discern from tates approach to the interview.
Shes not good enough and dosent have enough information to make tate answer her question properly and shes basicly trying to figure that out the whole argument so theres not much to talk about.
Tate is trying to do the same/opposite without fucking himself. He has a lot of information we dont which is why he's the focus.
????????? EVERYTHING SHE DID IS STANDARD FOR BBC 😂😂😂 Tate should have been better prepared for these questions instead of just crying and whining no context over and over
Asking pointed questions based on shit an interviewee has said and done is part of being a professional journalist. You clearly don't know what professional journalism is meant to look like.
@@BaldurL if it’s standard for a news outlet to go into an interview not fully prepared, who is going to be ready for that? One does not prepare to be poorly questioned
Destiny holding tears lmaooo
okay tough guy what are you minting next?
Classic cope-comment. 😂
He ain't holding them tears today, he's melting today 😂😂😂😂😂
Holding tears? You think people care so much about random stuff like this, because you do I guess. But most people just passively observe stuff like this, have an opinion, and move on
Dang you're coping hard bro chill don't suck him too much
Whether you know that you’re completely fucked or completely innocent it’s always a really dumb idea to do an interview like this during an ongoing investigation, his attorney is probably losing their mind over the fact that he did this.
His attorney was in the room
@@hazethere9410 losing their mind
actually it makes him look better because the full interview to the bbc cut and edited video is 12min short. it shows that they tailored the video to fit there agenda. just pushes the world of fake journalisim
This is fine, but if he would have said nothing and went to jail, there would be nothing to come back to. I think this is just a charade to keep Tate fans still supporting him after everything goes down
@@mint2marie Generally in many legal systems, individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Sharing information about an ongoing investigation could potentially compromise the presumption if innocence and could lead to prejudiced opinions or the spread of misinformation, a perfect example of this is the comments online surrounding the subject, especially during an ongoing murder trial, many of the comments sections are turned off - I would call that trying to do your job rather than losing their mind.
He comes across as such a child here. Throwing a tantrum and dodging questions for the entire first half.
You seem to forget that Tate had already adressed most of the out of context quotes many times already. He basically made his point pretty much clear on Pierce Morgan already and it really seemed like the BBC reporter didn’ properly research her claims.
I laughed so much when she talked about the machete part. That was crystal clear that she didn’t do any research on him 😂😂😂
Exactly😭
*piers.. but yea top G is GOAT
If it's so easy, then why not adress the things she said?
She gave him a quote that people know. This is as much an opportunity to straighten things out as it is an attack on him.
If he would have been smart about it, he would came out of there explaining everything and framing it in the way he wants to.
The "I have already explained it" argument is stupid. I'm currently watching this interview. Are you now giving me homework to watch another one?
It's not like he is explaining the same thing to the same person...
@@maxwellsdemon10 im not saying that Tate couldn’t have handled it smarter. Matter of fact the smartest thing would have been to not give the interview at all.
I don’t give a fuck about what anybody watching this does but it was the reporters job to do their homework and look at this stuff which she clearly didn’t so I can understand why Tate wouldn’t talk about it that much.
Once again I’m not saying Tate handled this perfectly at all, just that the interviewer was very very bad.
Destiny is super in denial on this topic, and is so begrudged against Tate. He's good at getting mad and banning people who suggest that though.
Super denial. Oh so begrudged. Mad and banning.
But uh... I can't for the life of me make an argument against him!
@@usucdik Well for one, Destiny berated Tate for putting himself in a position where he can't lose; 'if Tate is innocent, he's innocent and proven correct, if Tate is guilty, the Matrix has come for him and Tate is correct, if Tate is released and then later found guilty, the Matrix has had a devout long term mission to eventually imprison him, and Tate is correct'.
This is a direct criticism made of Tates position, critiquing that Tate has put himself in a position where he can't be wrong.
However, Destiny has done the exact same. If Tate is innocent, enough evidence wasn't provided and Destiny was correct. If Tate is guilty, Destiny said that he would wait for sufficient evidence and along with his suspicions, Destiny was correct. If Tate is let go and then later imprisoned, Destiny said that enough evidence wasn't provided and then it was, and along with his suspicions, Destiny was correct.
The exact, literal, definite criticisms that Steven uses to critique the weakness of other peoples positions, he is directly using himself to be right in all cases.
I can point out other clear hypocrisies if you need?
I get that you're a Destiny soy boy fan but have a backbone and see things for how they are.
@@MrSenserus destiny saying there wasn’t enough evidence doesn’t mean he thinks tate “got away with it” he is making an observation the exact opposite of your examination. You’ve got tates cock tattooed on your face you might want to get that removed sometime
@@MrSenserus Thats not why he said that. I dont know why you're fixating on being 'correct'. It isnt about be able to say "I was right" and have clout. This is about whether or not Tate has committed any crimes. Your reversal of that quote that you think is some callout, which it isnt, is objectively the correct way to view the situation without any bias. If evidence shows no crime was committed then no crime was committed, if evidence shows he committed the crimes hes charged with, then he commited crimes. Full stop.
That quote is what Destiny said about how Tates fans will justify any of the results of the case and theres no point in arguing with them, its not critique on Tate himself. Where Tate is at and the perception of his fans are two completely separate things. Destiny has always held the position of "wait for the investigation and case to have a verdict", because incase you dont know, We have no access to the evidence presented in case and can not see for ourselves UNTIL it becomes public which will then determine who was right about Tate committing a crime. What matters is if there was crime committed.
If you go around stating that you're doing these illegal things online for everyone to see, and he did, denying it is simply factually wrong and deniers should not be entertained. Then no shit there will be investigation about it due to the suspicion it will arise. Thats how a criminal justice system works.
34:57
The Ben Shapiro interview was with Andrew Neil. His interviews were always the toughest. One of the only guys that ever held politicians to what they said on TV.
lol the jew ? HE doesnt care about anything but money . Hes a right wing jew cux thats whos got the money . He'd be a liberal jew if thats where the wind blew
Too bad he is a political nutjob. But that interview with Shapiro is poor gold.
Paxman
@@lukeet331 paxman is a problem
I actually thought destiny would of been a bit more less bias but he’s still Tate hater
Yea because Destiny is a cuck and Tate is a positive role model.
Trap him? Lol.
Name an example.
Destiny said piers Morgan fucked andrew up. I don't know what you was watching mate. Piers brought tate back 3 times as the first interview embarrassed piers and piers genuinely started to like andrew as he completely switched his style of interview
Whether you agree with Tate or not, when you see the difference between this and the hacked up version the BBC put out there, you see how they tried to do this guy with this hit piece. It's bad.
And it still made the BBC look and Tate look like the good guy, if anything. And I don't particularly care for the guy. Don't hate him either, I just think he's an attention seeker and really good at it
Maybe just giving him an opportunity to incriminate himself?
Only Destiny can look at this and think that BBC came up on top 😂
Meh, both were bad. Him denying the existence of the original website, specifically the Pimpin Hoes Degree, denying that he "owns" Hustlers University, etc. There are reuploads of entire courses where he talks about how he manipulates women to make money. Those are all lies that can be easily disproven. But the woman brought up really stupid questions and bringing up the Machete thing was rtarded, it was from a joke video.
The journalist is there to ask questions not to win a competition that's why BBC came up on top because Tate lost control.
A journalist ask questions.
@@hm7563 is that why they took down the video from one of the most prized interviewes everyone has been seeking? Upload 10 minutes of 30, then take the whole thing down... think about how often that happens
@@goedel. This is my exact opinion on the interview, like to the T. he shouldnt have done the interview
@H M you gotta be on drugs if you think tate lost control smh this woman looked like she had ZERO experience in this and telling him she won't answer his questions straight up disrespectful she lost HER cool
Not just BBC, I would say British news media, even with there biases, are on average much tougher interviews than what is the norm in the USA.
“Their” not “there,” people really are illiterate these days
I've noticed it too, piers Morgan, this lady, the woman who interviewed Jordan Peterson - there is a higher level of self-righteousness and talking down to anybody and everybody
@@FriedWyce I know what you mean. "days."
British media is soft on the people they want to be. They are infamous here for being biased and corrupt, especially the BBC. Most likely they were tough on him to get a lot of attention on the interview.
@@Ptracki Talking down... lol... oh you would like interviewers to be push overs and just ask softballs.
“You said that I said ‘I’m the most dangerous man in the world’ is that some kind of proof that I’m dangerous? Am I Dr. Evil now?” Was hilarious.
She wanted him to clarify.what wrong with that? Is top g to fragile ?
2:00 - Andrew says he won't be answering certain questions due to possibly self incrementing. 48:10- destiny spazed and said andrew nor his legal team said anything before the pressing case questions
Yeah, I wonder why he got so emotional. Probably hates Tate.
Yeah that was pretty wild, sad to see things go that way for Destiny now
Destiny is so in denial but he did come out and say that he does not like tate out rightfully. He says out of context because he states that she does no research at all and takes it out of context he expect her to do her research and she didn’t.
@Sto-chas-tic perhaps it's time to get off the internet then
@@sto-chas-tic4049 Destiny is 1000 x smarter than andrew tate. 10,000 x smarter than any redpill peddler, and 1 million times smarter than you.
@@gardenerzh0ngbase173 You could've stopped at being smarter then andrew but to get so emotionally.......Yikes
@@cebokraai2487 Bro its a fact, destiny is 100 times smarter than even me. YOU are being emotional, not me. I am logic based, you cannot find a single person who is more logical than me, except Destiny of course.
@nothayku That's not smart, that's manipulative business strategy. Even Einstein's net worth was like 600k adjusted for inflation. If money alone makes you intelligent, all the r*tard Tate fans should be worshipping bill gates.
His strategy of angrily denying what he's openly said on video, saying it never happened, it's just the dumbest shit ever. The equivalent of a toddle using the "nuh uh!"
Is saying something and doing something the same thing?
@@mcbean1 he is denying having said things that everyone can see he has
to be fair, he has no other choice lol.
and it's also an indicator of how abusively he probably handles his relationships, if he'll just say "no, that video of me I made isn't real." it's the most extreme gaslighting in existence. literally "no, you cannot believe your eyes, trust me instead."
@@mcbean1 If he was saying that he was lying on that video or misrepresenting himself or exaggerating or something like that, one could say that he might not have actually done it despite having said so.
If his best retort is to deny the existence of the video which very clearly exists, he probably did it and just doesn't want to acknowledge the proof he himself gave of it.
its funny how bias will shape the way you perceive tate and interviews . these reactors need to get a life
Yes but Sophie hasn't filed charges and doesn't exist!
Sophie is obviously not her real name. It doesn't mean she's not a real person you dip.
The balls for Tate to give love interview while charges are still possible is nuts. Trump might go do a rally, but he controls the mic. This is bananas, this is Sith lord levels of trying to control the narrative
And failing.
It's not nuts. It's a cash grab.
He cannot help self switching. Its in his DNA at this point.
It's very common to confuse bravery and stupidity.
If you were charged and knew to be 100% innocent you'd most likely do the same
I wish Destiny wasn't so biased against tate, because it would be great to hear his unbiased take of this interview.
Why does he hate Tate so much?
@@TrideepNagg I think sometimes people just dislike someone and they really have no idea why, than they look for reasons to reinforce their dislike of that person.
@@TrideepNagg it’s a geek vs jock thing. Geeks are incredibly insecure around jocks for obvious reasons.
@@everknight7704 yeah no reason, not because by Tate' own words describes exactly the "lover boy" method for sex trafficking, admits explicitly scamming money from men with fake promises from their webcam girls, and the worst of all, he promotes himself as a high-value successful businessman which carries the true message for men in a matrix world, when he's just a funny entertaining phony, possible criminal, who made his money scamming, he's ideologically and morally reprehensible and inconsistent clown that doesn't take accountability for shit (the matrix, the matrix!) and gives the most shallow, impractical and stupid advice for men, and to make him more unlikeable, have a legion of NPCs who are homophobic but suck his dick dry on the gayest way possible at every given chance, WHAT A LIKEABLE GUY, RIGHT?
@@oneextra8659 the sex business is not an honest business we can agree, but what’s despicable is people like you who are unable to hold women who are involved to the same candle, all while pushing the false “equality” of the sexes bullshit. The entire sex cam industry is built around taking advantage of MEN. The women involved make men fall in love with them and sometimes drain their entire savings due to it. When a man does this he’s just an idiot, when a woman gives her body for someone she’s “fell in love with” now all of a sudden “manipulative”. That’s BULLSHIT when the industry is built to take advantage of men. It’s 1000% hypocrisy and I don’t respect anyone who pedals these ideas.
Tate really controlled the interviewer here, optically, to someone who doesnt know the story. I feel like we know tate is avoiding questions but he definitely is bullying the conversation where he wants to go.
I like how majority of the comments section is on tate's side
Yeah it just shows you how stupid people are hey!!!
those are critical comments not on tate’s side
I’ve learned destinies silence says a lot more than when he talks.
Maaaan Andrew has told the story of how he got all those girls to do cam work so many times… he’s also said all this stuff that she’s saying he said. I’ve literally seen him say it. And he’s just saying he didn’t say it… that’s insane. You can look it up. Maybe he thinks his fans will just believe him when he says he didn’t say it and he thinks that’s enough?? I don’t even necessarily think he’s guilty of what they’re accusing him of, but he IS guilty of saying all the stuff she’s quoting him on. That’s for sure.
Getting girls to like you to get in the cam business isn’t even what he’s charged for and also nor is it illegal LOOL we all manipulate people to get what we want…… with your point then we should arrest every OF girls emotionally manipulating men to send them money online it’s the same shit. You taking advantage of someone for your own gain
@@youngali505 wtf? Did I say that? I said he’s acting like he never said any of that stuff about making girls fall in love with him. But he for sure said that. He’s said that while telling that cam girl story. I’ve seen it. I’ve watched a ton of videos with Andrew tate and really liked him. I never said anything about him being charged for the OF stuff I’m just saying that he can’t sit there and say he never said some of this shit bc he did and people can look it up.
So he’s guilty of saying shit you don’t like….got it 👍
@@Macheako you are purposely being obtuse. He’s guilty of lying about saying the shit. I never once I said I disagreed with anything. You are just making shit up.
@@Macheako your comprehension skills are lacking (which unsurprising, to say the least). She's saying that he is denying things he has said in the past, which is suspicious.
It's crazy 😂 how destiny can't see how bias he is towards tate
What can he do? Tate is an unlilable MF.
He is the matrix 😄
The same like tates fan boys. But destiny mostly is very logical at least and do lots of research so its a big difference. But in this video hes avsolutely i see destiny first time like this and im glad his followers are bot like tate worshippers who are just embarassing and can disagree with destiny when they see bias
@@unrealAna thank u for the notice now fk off😄😄😄
I see why cucks exist in this world. There are many 'friends' who don't see the dark side of them why they even became friends with.
But somebody that is not tate fan, its honestly crazy you dont see how bad the BBC looked in this interview. I think he handled himself great. But I do agree he should not have done this in the first because like you said the courts can find anything and use it against you.
Mad because today they dropped some charges.
Soyboys cope.
Comments here are such a copefest. Probably one of the few places on internet where people think the interviewer wasn't terrible.
Have you seen any other BBC interviews, from what I've seen literally all of their interviewers are like this.
The moment Tate denied HIS OWN WORDS any credibility of his should be lost. However much he "owned" the woman in the interview, if you still think that Tate is completely clear, you are an idiot. As Destiny said before, either he was lying, or he committed a crime. Right now he chose the option of lying
He deleted that site and those lectures. He thought she would bulk and he can bully her into saying she doesn’t know where it was from but she kept reminding him it’s his own words in his own site he published.
BBC you hypocrites you get thousands of complaints about your race baiting and toxic feminism
I mean if I were in his position, I'd do the same. This is about winning in court for him now, that's what matters. Claiming he was lying for years is his legal defense. I might even be willing to bet he'd admit as much once statute of limitations or w/e has passed.
Bro im trying to find that clip of him saying those things but i cant find it but i remember seeing it multiple times does anyone have the clip
yeah because there is an investigation, he did say these things, but these things shouldn't be crimes " manipulating with words" they are autonomous humans able to make decisions, he lied cause the law is unfair. that's it
He did the interview knowing the interviewer would have bias against him, he’s just good at staying relevant 🤷🏼♂️
I mean if the interviewer wanted the interview themselves, couldn’t you say the same for them?
If that's the case, that's an even larger L for BBC. Why the f is an established institution of the fourth estate purposely and purposefully invite, ignite, and engage in low level squabble simply to provide empty calorie views? That's next level pathetic. I truly hope everyone involved was taken aback, including the production team at BBC.
@@MrColdwilliam we can try and talk around it but the squabblely views is what all media sources look for, newspaper magazines new stations etc.
His problem wasn't their bias, it was discussing the case. Destiny claims towards the end of the video that Tate was willing to talk about everything but then clammed up and pretended he couldn't talk about the case. But it was one of the first things that he even said at 1:30. Destiny is very weirdly biased when it comes to this guy. Tate is such a clownish entity, I don't know how anyone could love or hate him so much.
@@tonytheg6612 did you listen to the interview? was the interviewer educated on the topics?
28 minutes of destiny being biased against tate is wild here
At this point, Destiny will disagree & always have something to say about every masculine influencer. Shame😂😂🤦🏽
If you think Tator Tot is a idol for masculinity, you are already too far gone.
@@giaholmed2626 Andrew Tate, Jordan Peterson , David Goggins etc. are all masculine idols... You're Destiny's fanboy or girl, which is why you obviously would disagree... I'm guessing you and everyone here thinks that Destiny is a masculine figure 😂🤦🏽.
@@giaholmed2626 Yea if only he was a 'strong man' like Destiny, advocating for men to have open relationships. LMAOOOOoOOoooOOOo
@@suntzu6122 God why are Andrew Tate fans this insecure?
yeah the cuck is a bit sad, what a loser lol
As a British person, it would be nice to see the reporter showing a bit more grace, I think it was quite clear that she feels very personally offended by Tate and they should have sent someone else. The BBC, now more than ever, needs to work on its impartiality as a taxpayer funded news media.
tell that to tate cause he can't seem to shut his mouth, even when the interviewer is calmly asking him questions.
@@reikoakatsuno3702 He can do whatever the fuck he wants, its his house, but the BBC interviewer is paid by the taxpayer, she is obligated to actually do a good job.
@@CrestOfArtorias and tate is being funded by the stupid losers he have scammed online like yourself, that wouldn't change the fact that tate is melting the entire time lol, the interviewer remained calm even though tate is exteremely combative, so kudos to her.
Wrong. Tate has no manners or diplomacy so he has to be treated like the intimidated manchild that he is.
The longer this clip went on the less Destiny had to say. Hilarious
and then at the very end he got his little *** ass up and went to the bathroom instead of giving a rebuttle.
yep
He had to take a call from his wife’s boyfriend
@@jojostar7973 hahahaa
I think that's the most excitement Andrew Tate has had in a long time. You could see him at the very end he was smiling and giddy.
Yeah he’s hungry for that fame.
People who like Tate and dislike Tate can agree on one thing he’s a corny guy. A good corny guy or a bad corny guy he’s a corny motherfucker.
He was nervously shaking towards the end
@@sevllyne1394 your horrible at reading body language
@@sevllyne1394 yeah he was, poor guy he’s been through a lot
How easy it is to go after a guy for sex trafficking when he manages a completely legal web cam business of sexual content?
Destiny desperately trying to find holes in Tate to poke at rather than watching objectively
Its not desperately. He already knows where the holes are. Were watching 2 idiots try to find these holes / hide them knowing how it all works already.
Tate is like a Swiss cheese at this point. There is no need to look hard.
@@sathrielsatanson666 must’ve watched a diff video…
In your view, "watching objetively"=having the same opinion as you about this whole situtation
@@-toxicus-8582 what do you disagree on?
What's the song at the beginning of this video? Somebody please
I think I actually disagree with Destiny's read on this interview, at least for some of the talking points. I think she had to be more explicit about how Tate is dodging questions or downplaying things he's said. It kind of seems like you have to know he's in the wrong ahead of time for Tate to appear evasive.
Yea lmao he’s waaaaaay off. If BBC Interviewed Destiny and pulled random inflammatory statements that he’s made, with 0 surrounding context, Destiny would be the first mother f’er to scream “that’s way out of context!”
That's the thing. That interviewer was pretty bad... and Tate looked bad anyway
well said.this the first video i seen of destiny and it makes sense. bro has blue hair and is a streamer so theres no way he would like to hear someone spending 25m a year on charity or tate winning in general
@@sathrielsatanson666tate didnt he looked like himself, innocent and all
@@CRWeaventure I dunno about that one. It would be better to either have better responses or to call off the interview altogether. I just don't think Tate ends up looking that bad, meanwhile he's actively throwing the interview. It should have gone way worse for him.
Tate acts this way as he is innocent and thats where the confidence comes from
I talked to several people involved in sex trafficking in a past life and asked them about Tate. They all laughed and agreed he did it, just because how similar his business is to the ones they worked for.
How much experience do you have in sex trafficking?
@@flok462 I talked to several people involved in sex trafficking in a past life and asked them about Tate. They all laughed and disagreed that he did it, just because of how dissimilar his business is to the ones they worked for.
How much experience do you have in sex trafficking?
@Flo K The fact that you have experience in sex trafficking is something I wouldn't admit on the internet if I was you 😂 But suuuuure, you've asked sooooo many sex trafficking workers and experts about him 😂
@@tdaye6978 i didnt say I did 🤣
I just work with people in a totally different field who used to work for those kind of organisations. But dont worry - all stuff they did and were not convicted for is long over the statute of limitations.
How are you sure he's innocent?
It’s so weird to me that at no point does this journalist ask for clarification about “the matrix”, e.g. “is this ‘matrix’ in the room with us right now?”
If this interview is a disaster for Tate, why did the BBC edit so much? You would think they would play the whole interview if it would have been a double U for the BBC
Worse than that.... they actually took down the interview lol.
Dear Red Pill Swallowers, if you want an excellent example of calm cool unemotional Stoic behavior, take note of the BBC journalist. She is an ice cube 🧊
Crazy. I thought she was a human.
@@kaddindefiant very very clever reply...expected
So unemotional that she refused to shake his hand and sulked instead. Sure
@@LarjieGamer If the journalist acted the way Tate did you'd notice it, but because Tate is your father figure you're blind in bias.
Interviewer: accuses tate of saying something that he is ON VIDEO SAYING
Tate: naurarmnut, nauraidien’t
British “people”
It's pronounced Bri ish
Where's the video? Link it
He literally said to her “you’re just bringing it up from Reddit” as if to say just some made up internet thing
And then in the next sentence said “I’m a great guy, look at all my RUclips comments” 😂
Such a clown
Tell me more about how taking things out of context and clipping them is 'journalistic integrity' or being genuine. Oh wait.
There are many students male and female that already disrespect their teachers without using Andrew's name. Being a teacher is a very thankless job this isn't a secret. And when children or teenagers are put in an unfavorable situation they will tend to lie to deflect blame away from themselves. People do this all the time children especially, and while I'll say Andrew Tate most likely isn't the most influential man in the world I can see him having larger influences on certain parts of the world. So on that I'll say this; it isn't out of the realm of possibility that children who might not even be fans in the first place are just using his name to justify their behavior. Many celebrities have toxic fans that most celebrities don't acknowledge; for example, in kpop, there are toxic fans known as sasaengs, and I would bet a lot of money that kpop idols don't consider those sasaeng fans to be real fans.
I think it comes down to this
Tate isnt responsible for these peoples actions, but he is responsible for his own actions and the image he presents to people.
He isnt responisble for people being misogynistic in his name, but he is very clearly resonating with misogynistic people, he didnt create them but he speaks to what they do.
He clearly has misogynistic fans who take the misogynistic things he says, regurgitates them and spreads them, but then the tate defence gets put up that hes actually really motivational so its okay, and the "well i dont listen to his bad stuff so its okay", ignoring the fact that some people do listen to his bad stuff and are influenced by it.
Im not for banning him for his opinions unless he makes calls to action, but i am 100% for interviews like this that pressure him on the things he said and try to show the idiocy in what he says.
This particular interview succeeded and failed to that in different ways, but this type of interview itself is good and exactly what i want, i want people who say outlandish things combined with messages toxicity to be held accountable for their words and pushed on them to see the truth in them, or conversely just how wrong they are.
He isn't spreading toxicity though. The hundreds of other influencers certainly are, he may not be correct about everhthing he says, but he defo is a better influence than these other guys. His message will effectively avoid the future generation from becoming a dumbed out population that are sruck on their screens, addicted to porn and not talking to the opposite sex.
Nobody cares. You get 3 and a half months off a year. Paid, cry more about it
A few years ago it was shooter games or gta. There always will be a scapegoat for this stuff and now its andrew
@@nofugz8939 literally every guy that follows tate turns into a creep and a loser. whether you believe it or not. met a tate fan in real life, never met him again.
Any peanut actually considered that Tate might actually be guilty? This is the era of delusion.
It's possible but maybe make assumptions when you evidence?
@@magic8269 highly likely
@@jpw5029 You're a brick wall. If you've made up your mind that's fine. But don't talk about open mindedness then.
@@magic8269 I’m open to him being innocent, but everything he does indicates it’s more likely he’s guilty than being attacked by the “matrix”.
Considering he admitted to it by making a “how to traffic women”’tutorial. I’d say it’s safe to say he’s guilty.
Why would he agree to do this interview? Obviously, to look even more braver and truthful to his loyal followers who are already fully bought in and cannot think critically.
Or he did it because he genuinely believes he did nothing wrong (even if he legally might have)? I mean isn't that more logical?
@@themanwhoseesallthings2621 even if that was true, how is that the more logical explanation?
I mean, if you're a charlatan and a scammer (not necessarily saying he is) then it's very logical to keep scamming and lying to your audience.
@Volkan Kaman I think the important part of his commet is that "he believes he did nothing wrong"
@@Falroth Bro i'm not a tate enjoyer but this is delusional redditor tier cope
@@s0ne01 great. Im sure every scammer would like you to believe that 👍
That was embarrassing for the BBC.
Right? They spent all that money flying the crew out to Romania for this answer-free interview.
You mean Andrew Tate? He looks completely unhinged and avoided answering any question
@@WELSHGAMER99 what question did he avoid? And be serious..the BBC is getting ratiod to death online they had to take down there own video of there site and before you claim it’s the tate fanboys bombing it…where is all the BBC supporters or tate haters?
They were EXTREMELY disingenuous the entire time and the fact they cut down a 38 min video into 12 minutes supports that. It also doesn’t help that tate TOLD HER they would edit his interview with them down in that way and they actually did it!..embarrassing indeed for them
@@WELSHGAMER99 Ok I see what your saying but how did the interviewer look to you?
@@WELSHGAMER99 He legit denied all allegations , caught her quoting him out of context twice, and stood his ground. You just want him to be wrong and it shows. Go to the comment section of the full 30 min interview and read the comments, he won the audience for sure. And how is saying 'I didn't say that' not the answer to a question ? If you didn't say something, then what else is there to say about a nonexistent statement you didn't make, how is this 'evading' the question ?
For clarification: “Sophie” was in the original BBC interview released in December. The name was made up and voice was covered for her identity as stated by BBC.
Is it REALLY too much to expect the BBC to actually show him the damn clips they're referencing?
Apparently
What do you expect her to do? Pull out her phone to show him? Tate would never allow them to setup a TV to directly reference material.
@@gt1r she could literally use her phone lmao
@@gt1ryes lol I wish interviews did this
I don't know whether they have those clips but i have seen clips where he indeed says abusive shit and encourages manipulation of women. So wouldn't be surprised if it was legit
They didn't allow the reporter or her staff to bring up clips or digital material during the interview or the Tates would call it off. So the BBC didnt want to risk losing the interview and agreed.
She came here with a bias its blindingly obvious, she should stick with the web cam business, the advice he gave about trapping and using women and the exploitation of the young men through hustlers university. This isn't going to convince the tate fans, either way i think he is guilty because he gave way to detailed advice on the web cam trade and tricking women into it.
He isn’t even charged with nothing to do with cam business LOOOL it’s maud how a false narrative like this has gone so far lol his cam business ended 7 years ago. If you actually did a lil research you wouldn’t say he’s guilty at all
@@youngali505 Bro you can’t even spell. What makes any of us think you can read? Let alone do any research at all?
@@youngali505 these people never do research EVER they just go off what everyone else says their sheep
Not a Tate fan, I’m actually a Destiny fan of about 3 years and without a doubt he came out looking better than the BBC here
Lol you are most definitely a Tate fan, stop capping😂 Anyone who can think critically can see that Tate did a horrible job in this interview
‘Not bias’ but goes against everything Andrew says and doesn’t see anything wrong with this interviewer?? What am I watching lmfaoo
The comments are full of NPC’s damn. What color did u dye ur hair today ?
I went with fire dye today, I was tired of the purple, I had it since Sunday, the whole week basically.
Destiny obviously wants him to be guilty so bad.Hes been proven wrong so many times I guess his ego cannot take it.
Destinys ego?
I wonder how hard you’ll cry when he gets charged
@@amicablexvi1372 he meant blue hair
@@milandalosur1850 i wonder how hard you are gonna hide when he wins (already winning, grape charges has been dropped)
@@justice2 Ok just sex trafficking charges then no big deal cool! Enjoy paying him 49.99 a month to watch the matrix or whatever you losers do
Man, it's like the whole world is holding it's breath to see what next Tate does or say.... He road killed that interviewer. 😂😂😂I can hear his haters aka destiny dieing inside.😂😂😂
Destiny is too deep in his stance against Tate. He can't even admit when Tate has the upper hand in an interview. This tells me he'll never change his opinion about him even if Tate gets proven innocent and released.
what else you expect from a guy getting it from the back with no vaseline😂
I'm not sure how you can watch that interview and come to the conclusion that he got the upper hand, this interview did not help his case at all. This is a pr disaster, he made himself look egocentric and stupid
i mean, he even say that at 11:52
Is clear as sun ligth that if tate is found inocent, for this guys is going to be "they couldnt prove hes guilty but he is"
haha... upper hand... also it's not a debate, they just try to get him to answer the questions they come up with, and it's only up to Tate to give answers or not and apparently to try to make himself look as less bad as all of the evidence against him suggests otherwise
Upper hand hahaha
5:12 this if proof that his r3t4rded fan base will believe anything. He literally said it on camera and posted it on his sight and here he is with a straight face denying it like bro lmfao
Do you think if it was clearly evidenced he said that and was posted on his own site, he would deny it? That would just be opening yourself up to a fuckload of trouble in court. Perhaps your bias is clouding your ability to make a fair judgement. Can you prove that clip was posted by him on a site owned by him? He's denying it for a reason publicly, he's not stupid.
@@MrSenserus considering I’ve literally seen the video your comment is irrelevant. My response is just yes, he’s stupid
Tate's 4D chess strategy: Say so many incriminating things that they miss the deadline file charges
Tate was spanked by piers? I’m sorry??
This dude is full of shit bro idk why he hating so much it’s actually sad he is allegedly a grown man
@@boobear7299 elaborate simp
Destiny. Bro. It’s not like he’s going to remember EVERYTHING she brings up on the fly. There’s 1000s of things she could bring up. Within 2 minutes he was able to connect the dots on what she was talking about and then prove exactly what he said, that she was taking it OUT OF CONTEXT
He refuses to engage in the question about his voice recording on his websites that were taken down. He absolutely seemed to be dishonest there and idk the BBC only cares because they hate Tate for bad reasons but he was wrong some in the interview and the BBC was right some. By far Tate is fighting the good fight and more honest and better in this interview than the BBC. They’re evil propaganda but he was wrong some here too. I’m team tate so don’t get me wrong. Too many people are so anti BBC or CNN and pro tate and Kanye and trump and musk that if big propaganda news networks are right, even if they’re doing it for bad reasons and wouldn’t if it was their guy like biden, we are still defining our guy who was a little wrong about something and condemning them when they finally come up with something that’s fair to point out. Though incredibly hypocritical don’t get me wrong.
Tate also says a lot of jokes but he could move just said that was a joke or taken out of context and really had a conversation about it. I know they take jokes and things out of context but I can’t just take someone’s word and if they refuse to discuss and explain it the BBC for me as the viewer to understand then I can’t really be persuaded. I know rate isn’t perfect and the porn business is a dark bad business if you ask me. But he’s still fighting the right people and does tremendous good for the world and way more than I could ever do even with the money he has. But he still does some really bad things it seems like but we are all human. We’re all flawed and he’s trying to be right.
@@jessejive117 did you actually listen to that recording there was something very shady about that recording it did not sound natural at all it sound cut and edited
1: most of this shit was on his website
2: even if he didnt remember, you dont have to spend 4 minutes yelling about how it isnt true or the BBC is lying.
He clearly did remember, which is why he quickly dismissed it. He knew what he said, what he shouldn't say since it would hurt his case, and even what stuff was on his website before that would be bad for him.
How did he expect this to go? That she'd stroke his ego and not ask any difficult questions?
I didnt hear any hard questions
Just the same questions I've heard constantly , the fact the BBC didn't even get full machete context made them look just as bad , and if intentional then its really bad but I assume they just hd to much to research on tate they just missed it
He expected to make her feel bad and let him steam roll and control the interview
@@cryptouk7985 not only the full machete context but she literally accused him of wanting to hit his woman with a machete
This wasn’t a good interview for the BBC, it made them look terrible and Andrew look good.
Tate big dumb for this one.
Destiny is bad faith at all times
They have him questions and tell them something else lmao destiny stop hiding facts he said
Destiny's bias seeps right through. And now it's been revealed that the only accusations against the Tates have to do with with the 3 girls who made TikToks in his residence a year ago? So nothing from all the years prior like Destiny said it was? How foolish
Yuh destiny you were pretty one sided on this the Interviewer did a horrible job. @35:00 Right after she lied about what Andrew said in a clip you call Andrew a crybaby for calling it out right after she completely lied about what he said😂 like cmon.
It’s just so irritating trying to persuade the media that is trying to incriminate you.
Trump did the same thing with the media.
Yup, and they kept doin the same to him.
"Why don't you denounce white supremacy right now?!?!"
He did. He does. He keeps doin it. There's a video of him doin it for 3 mins straight in different interviews and rallys. Most deff the Trump treatment
"THEN IT SHOULD BE EASY TO DO IT AGAIN!!"
...... That's not the point, quit asking the same sht or you will just be seen as NPCs and reinforce MSM being a joke
Destiny, you get a hard on to the thought of Tate being imprisoned. Or maybe you are starting to believe he is innocent, but you can’t back down on your position 😂😂😂
It’s not dumb. It’s calculated. He left it to show her bias and embarrass her
Destiny cant see that for some reason
@@FiryaFYI Tate Derangement Syndrome
@@MrSenserus
This has the same toxic kathy newman vs Jordan Peterson vibe. VERY hard to miss that. lefist are not all there...
He keeps trollin the BBC and they won't realize because they can't meme. Ready for the next idiot they send 😂
they both definitely fucked bad
Cornerstone's of ethical journalism are truth, accuracy, and the big one that is lacking in this interview objectivity. Journalists should be neutral and unbiased i think that is what made this BBC interview a complete fail
Media is now bought and paid for by Special Interests. I went to school for Journalism and it is an utter shame what it has come to.
Uk/ BBC has unbiased reporting rules, They had to get creative to push their propaganda. It can backfire spectacularly at times, which is why the some of the most notorious interviews that make the net is by UK journalists. It's no wonder the BBC has blocked Brits from watching their tate interview upload
BBC can't send someone who isn't biased, they are a hive mind
The reason was because it was never intended to be an interview, it was a hit piece attempt.
I agree with you, I think for sure you have to ask Tate difficult questions and imho those Tate fans who think otherwise are wrong, however it's vital to leave your emotions and biases out of it. She was unable to do that. For me this was my main issue.
That being said I don't quite understand why Tate expected her to change the subject or ask him easy questions. He's not being interviewed for donating money to charity. He's being interviewed because of the allegations against him. While it's great he's donating to charity that is derailing and try to change the topic. He does that quite often and yet amazingly his fans continue to support him. I just hope everyone on both sides can be objective and it's disappointing that neither side is.
Who is this Andy Tade guy?
TopG
Andre Tape
He is the lord and savior, follow his guidance and you will get laid in the afterlife.
@@TR13400who are you ? Nobody
He is your father that went for the milk and didnt come back
I’m sick of the disingenuous interviews, this just makes bbc look even worse, and will rally more support for the Tates.
Never give someone who says they want to talk then do otherwise the time of day.
Man both sides are stupid as hell lmfao
News: "will you incriminate yourself?"
Tate: "no"
News: "but what about now"
Tate: "no women have come forth
News: there are literally multiple women who have come forth"
Tate: "since no women have come forth, im safe"
The women who came forward don't seem interested in pressing charges. And the ones involved in the case don't seem to want to be. It's really stupid
yeah, none have come forth, because he hasn't done anything, how are you going to accuse him that woman purposely aren't coming forth, and using the excuse hes paying them is absolutely flawed logic.
@@calib5518At least three women have come forward against him for alleged rape and sexual assault allegations, we literally have recordings of him saying I love graping you
Also I would suggest you do some research into sex trafficking and how it's utilized by pimps to use women to do sex work and make them money, its all sophisticated manipulation and coercion with no use of force because it would be impractical if not impossible to use physical threats of violence and force to make somebody work for you, that would be called slavery
Destiny is so jealous that no one looks up to him like they do Tate.
lmao tatertot
Good lord, hate watchers are in earlier than usual.
Yesss it's gay to simp for a woman, but not for the almighty Tate! Slay king, you're doing great.
So true
Men don't typically look up to effeminate boys
I swear Destiny lives on a different planet when it comes to Andrew Tate... My guy, Andrew Tate looked "so bad" on this interview the only way to watch it is on Andrew Tate's platform because the BBC blocked it and then removed it from theirs 😂😂😂
A lot of attourneys would say it's a really dumb idea to do an interview during an ongoing charge. I'd be one to agree, however I saw a video that made me reconsider. It was regarding "preemptive striking" in the court of public opinion. As a public figure, having your name associated with charges without you having any word or say back and remaining silent can ruin you in the court of public opinion. And as a public figure that matters. Which is why a two pronged approach might be needed.
Andrew did this interview cause he’s trying to galvanize the support he has from his fans, that way if he’s found guilty, he can still martyr himself as victim of “the matrix”
Nah he did it to prove the matrix attack which it's pretty proven now cause if they gonna edit down a 50min video to 14min to try and make him look bad it's a very blatant attempt
Damned if you do damned if you don’t. I say speaking during an active case says a lot more about his innocence than otherwise, but I’m likely speaking to a wall anyway you seem like your mind was made up a year ago.
@@KSProxy What does it say about his innocence though? Going on an interview and outright lying sure doesn’t help public perception outside of his brainwashed fans who made their mind up a year ago.
@@vendetadesign What bad things does he say to do😂
@@KSProxy could you project any harder? god fucking damn lmao
He is exposing mainstream media that’s why he did the interview
suuuuuuuure he did... would you like some another dose of copium?
@@aiauc why is the bbc interview 12 mins and the rumble video 38...
why not post the full interview? what do they need to hide?
same thing with vice
His only successful exposé to date has been on himself.
@@aiauc don’t be so emotional that’s for bitches
The only thing he exposed is how insecure and scared he is
Destiny is so out of touch here, this interview was so amateurish. Nothing came out of this.
its so hard for destiny to not show on the outside how he feels on the inside. just like when aba was dancing with his girl and he couldnt even turn around and look
destiny got some tate goggles on and legit turns his brain off during these videos
destiny legit explained exactly what tate explained then said, "that's all he needs to say" like dude he did and you just listened to it. the cognitive dissonance is insane here
Destiny turned deaf n dumb😄
Destiny is all emotional on this one
56:50 "I'm the most googled person on the planet"
Taylor Swift is the most googled person 6.8 m last 30 days
56:55 "I'm the most googled man on the planet"
Messi is the most googled man 6.5 m last 30 days
Andrew Tate is 15th at 1.4 m last 30 days. Andrew just says things and ignores facts and reality.
He is narcissistic like he admitted his dad was.
“Who is Andrew Tate?” was the most searched sentence started with “Who is” on Google in the U.S. in 2022. It enjoyed basically no popularity throughout the first half of the year, before gradually growing in numbers from July onward.
@@back-to-new that's even funnier. what kind of ridiculous standard for being most googled is being in the "who is" category. That just means people heard of him but didn't know who tf he was lol.
🤓
Andrew is literally in house arrest barely uploading any content. At his peak he WAS the most googled man in the world. His point stands true regardless
I am going through comments here, and i think it is actually funny some people think he ended up looking good.
Yes, BBC interviewer is shite at her job, but that doesn't mean Andrew looked good. Like, openly denying he said what was read to him after a direct quote of his is read to him is wild.
Well he did look good in the end
He “looked good” for his absolutely braindead fans, who never engaged critically with any of the incriminating stuff he’s said. He did use rhetorical tricks quite well (interrupting a lot, talking with extreme confidence etc.) and this will make it seem like he’s right (if you’re a complete moron). He’s tailoring every part of the speech to his audience.
@@suspendedtwice4sayingrasis261 If you're a moron, you'll continue to think he committed a crime with no charges lmao.
@@sa-mp5iwbro y’all literally make the WORST arguments 😂😂❤ “they ain’t got chat history here”
Bro, blow it out your rear
@@shahyawar3709 To who? You? Tate fans? ... your average person who maybe doesn't know about Tate or doesn't have an opinion. To the latter he absolutely doesn't look good. All he had to here (and over the last year) is show some modicum of contrition. "I believe I am a force for good, but if people who follow my message interpret that as a call to violence/harassment/abuse towards women, I condemn their actions and that these people are misinterpreting my message and beliefs. Blah blah blah". Legit all he has/had to do. He doesn't even have to mean it. And yet, he just can't just flat out, unequivocally, say it. I wonder why it is so hard... hmmmmmmmmm.
I don’t if this interview is bad for Andrew tate or not but he sure knows how to talk.
It’s definitely not. He destroyed her and her bias😂 the bbc edited it down to 12 mins and they took it down off their site
The bbc video is still up, it’s fake news people are too lazy to see for themselves
😅😅😅😅😅😅
She had nothing on him so it wasn't a net negative for Tate, that's forsure
Destiny has brain but he loses it when it comes to animals and tate
Tate agreed to do the interview because the bcc had promised him to ask fair questions not relating to the case at all but they changed when the cameras got up.
He knew exactly what they would do😂 he did it to show their utter bias