Before the Rush critique, I didn't know Pitchfork. Then I got an idea of who they are by looking at what they like. They gave, for example, 8.4 for Best New Album to South Korean Parannoul's After the Magic and labeled it rock. If these are their tastes it is obvious that they do not like Maneskin. The fundamental point is that I don't need the opinion of a snooty journalist to make me like something. I will continue to love Maneskin and their music. Every time I listen to Rush, I can't sit still. Because it's a great rock album.
Yeah I think we've all seen that review from Pitchfork. They've tweetted a link to it like five or ten times (shows how desperate they are to use Måneskin for clickbait ;-) ) One thing I've realized looking at their previous reviews of rock songs, is that a negative review from Pitchfork, is the biggest possible compliment you can get as a rockband. Since it means you're real rock.
Yeah hahahaha Pitchfork is obsessed with them at the moment, stan behavior, is becoming funny tbh Their album is awesome, and Måneskin are self ironic and self aware, but some of the critics take them really seriously lol or probably just enjoy the buzz. Meanwhile Tom Morello had noticeably a lot of fun playing with them here and there and keeps talking about how good they are 😌 Their best lyrics are in Italian for the reason you said, but there are a lot of layers also in their English songs, they just don't like to explain themselves and like to troll the audience so ppl need to find out on their own. I think at them as a band of nerds for nerds, disguised as glam hot ppl lol
If you want to take a look at their range, i suggest Gasoline, Kool Kids and Il Dono Della Vita, from the new album. They have great ballads in Italian and especially like to be silly in English, cause as the singer (the lyricist) said, he feels more free writing cringe lyrics in English since is a second language and he wouldn't write the same things in Italian lol As a person that isn't an English mother tongue, I think is relatable lol
I think Rush is overproduced and oversimplified- it still sounds great live though. But one thing I don't get is how some people don't get the irony. They're sarcastic to the core and then some people take it at face value. It's really weird.
Thx. Try some other stuff from them: Wanna be your slave, video with 98 mio. views and Torna a casa with 163 mio. views. They are less American sounding. Peace.
Do you know the other talented italian band : the name of the band is : " NANOWAR of STEEL " founded in Rome 2003; the name of the song is : " WALHALLELUJA " from the album :" STAIRWAY to WALHALLA - 2018 "...check the song on youtube from " NAPALM RECORDS "...enjoy and good discover...ciao...
Silly question. Are you the Barrett whom Blake McLain producer refers to in his Rush Album reaction, meaning you would love to react to some of the songs in it?
@@BarrettJonesProducer heheheeh the world is small. Blake mentioned you while listening to the song "Don't wanna sleep". Now we expect you to react to it!!! :)))
So, you have never heard this song before, but had miraculously the same exact pedal as Morello used in the song just under your knee, ready to show? Cute! :D
Sorry, but I must post this quote from the Pitchfork article (Thanks, this journal was not known by me) ".. a band so bad that you can’t listen to their music without thinking that, finally, as a culture, we’ve arrived at some inevitable mass Måneskin event."
Pitchfork giving this album a 2, shows they know nothing about Rock. The album is not perfect, a little long and disjointed, with a couple experiments that were interesting, if not groundbreaking, and a couple “meh” numbers. There are some very good songs, and a lot of solid songs. Compared to the competition this is an 8 out of ten, if not more. Their last album was a solid 10, and it’s hard to top something like that. I will also say, having seen them live last winter, as well as watching several recorded live performances, is that they(unlike a lot of acts) are even better on stage, than in the studio.
Why do you think that "so called" music critic from Pitchfork was so harsh? Is USA's music establishment so scared of Måneskin because they are outside the control of the anglosaxon world? I am curious why a "so called" critic is so evidently biased
Clickbait. Pitchfork, based on their reviews, already doesn't like rock. But when you give a negative review ( esp one like that) of a popular but polarising band, you get clicks from both fans and haters, which is all they really care about.
There's artists that Pitchfork will trash viciously on a regular basis because they just don't like the approach the artists take to music. Read some of their reviews for The Mars Volta - a popular eclectic prog bands of the 00's.
Before the Rush critique, I didn't know Pitchfork.
Then I got an idea of who they are by looking at what they like.
They gave, for example, 8.4 for Best New Album to South Korean Parannoul's After the Magic and labeled it rock.
If these are their tastes it is obvious that they do not like Maneskin.
The fundamental point is that I don't need the opinion of a snooty journalist to make me like something.
I will continue to love Maneskin and their music.
Every time I listen to Rush, I can't sit still. Because it's a great rock album.
"For your love (live at 1LIVE WDR)" from Måneskin is a must!!! Look it up please ✌️
Pretty sure the first guitar solo is Thomas Raggi, while the 2nd one is Tom Morello.
MANESKIN!!! PER SEMPRE🎸🎸🎸🎸🎸🎸🎸🎸THE BEST
Love Måneskin! I love everything about Måneskin! 🤘
Love Maneskin
Yeah I think we've all seen that review from Pitchfork. They've tweetted a link to it like five or ten times (shows how desperate they are to use Måneskin for clickbait ;-) )
One thing I've realized looking at their previous reviews of rock songs, is that a negative review from Pitchfork, is the biggest possible compliment you can get as a rockband. Since it means you're real rock.
🤣👏👏👏
Thanks for your reaction. You should see to live performances. Awesome
Yeah hahahaha Pitchfork is obsessed with them at the moment, stan behavior, is becoming funny tbh
Their album is awesome, and Måneskin are self ironic and self aware, but some of the critics take them really seriously lol or probably just enjoy the buzz.
Meanwhile Tom Morello had noticeably a lot of fun playing with them here and there and keeps talking about how good they are 😌
Their best lyrics are in Italian for the reason you said, but there are a lot of layers also in their English songs, they just don't like to explain themselves and like to troll the audience so ppl need to find out on their own. I think at them as a band of nerds for nerds, disguised as glam hot ppl lol
If you want to take a look at their range, i suggest Gasoline, Kool Kids and Il Dono Della Vita, from the new album. They have great ballads in Italian and especially like to be silly in English, cause as the singer (the lyricist) said, he feels more free writing cringe lyrics in English since is a second language and he wouldn't write the same things in Italian lol
As a person that isn't an English mother tongue, I think is relatable lol
Ignore the .pitchfork review it was just click bait.
@@GayJayU26yep and they don't stop 💀
I think Rush is overproduced and oversimplified- it still sounds great live though. But one thing I don't get is how some people don't get the irony. They're sarcastic to the core and then some people take it at face value. It's really weird.
@@leno_o17 exactly, there are some songs that should be used as a sense of humor test cause if you don't get it it's broken
Thx. Try some other stuff from them:
Wanna be your slave, video with 98 mio. views and
Torna a casa with 163 mio. views.
They are less American sounding. Peace.
Do love Tom’s playing style. Great song. Always love a Barrett video. ❤❤
Do you know the other talented italian band : the name of the band is : " NANOWAR of STEEL " founded in Rome 2003; the name of the song is : " WALHALLELUJA " from the album :" STAIRWAY to WALHALLA - 2018 "...check the song on youtube from " NAPALM RECORDS "...enjoy and good discover...ciao...
Silly question. Are you the Barrett whom Blake McLain producer refers to in his Rush Album reaction, meaning you would love to react to some of the songs in it?
Yep
@@BarrettJonesProducer heheheeh the world is small. Blake mentioned you while listening to the song "Don't wanna sleep". Now we expect you to react to it!!! :)))
Rush Maneskin 2*..... Pitchfork (*lower is better)🤭🤭
So, you have never heard this song before, but had miraculously the same exact pedal as Morello used in the song just under your knee, ready to show? Cute! :D
Actually yes
@@BarrettJonesProducer okay, it sounds like serendipity then. Awesome. :)
Also... the title mentions Tom Morello who is well known for his use of said whammy pedal ;-)
Sorry, but I must post this quote from the Pitchfork article (Thanks, this journal was not known by me) ".. a band so bad that you can’t listen to their music without thinking that, finally, as a culture, we’ve arrived at some inevitable mass Måneskin event."
and wouldn't that be awesome? 😂
Pitchfork giving this album a 2, shows they know nothing about Rock.
The album is not perfect, a little long and disjointed, with a couple experiments that were interesting, if not groundbreaking, and a couple “meh” numbers. There are some very good songs, and a lot of solid songs. Compared to the competition this is an 8 out of ten, if not more. Their last album was a solid 10, and it’s hard to top something like that.
I will also say, having seen them live last winter, as well as watching several recorded live performances, is that they(unlike a lot of acts) are even better on stage, than in the studio.
I’m did you even watch this video? I was talking about how I disagreed with the Pitchfork review that gave the album a 2. I like this song!
@@BarrettJonesProducer sorry I wasn’t clear, I was just commenting about the other review
You were good!
Promo`SM 😝
grazie
Why do you think that "so called" music critic from Pitchfork was so harsh? Is USA's music establishment so scared of Måneskin because they are outside the control of the anglosaxon world? I am curious why a "so called" critic is so evidently biased
Clickbait.
Pitchfork, based on their reviews, already doesn't like rock.
But when you give a negative review ( esp one like that) of a popular but polarising band, you get clicks from both fans and haters, which is all they really care about.
There's artists that Pitchfork will trash viciously on a regular basis because they just don't like the approach the artists take to music. Read some of their reviews for The Mars Volta - a popular eclectic prog bands of the 00's.